DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Salmonid Stocking Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Salmonid Stocking Summary WISCONSIN’S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING PROGRAM Prepared: June 2017 By Thomas Burzynski Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 600 E. Greenfield Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 PUB-FH-828 2017 WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY Prepared by Thomas Burzynski Lake Michigan Fisheries Work Unit Milwaukee – UW WATER Institute Department of Natural Resources This stocking summary is based on stocking records entered by Wisconsin DNR staff into the statewide propagation database. A stocking record was generated each time hatchery fish were stocked into Lake Michigan. There are four types of information included in this summary report. First, total numbers of trout and salmon stocked from 1963-2016 are summarized. The numbers of trout and salmon that were requested for stocking during the current year (2017) are also included. The actual numbers of each species of fish stocked this year will depend on hatchery program production. The first summary (pages 2 and 3) is intended to provide an overview of long-term trends in the stocking of each species. The last three sets of summaries account for fish stocked during 2012-2016. The second set (pages 4 - 7) focuses on the numbers of fish stocked in each county along the Lake Michigan shoreline in 2012-2016. The third summary (pages 9 - 28) is a set of tables detailing specific stocking sites, the grid location of each stocking site, the specific number and age of fish planted at each site, and any identifying fin clips or marks. The fourth summary (pages 30 - 33) focuses on the marked trout and salmon stocked during the past five years (marked lake trout and steelhead are listed from 2005 and 2008 to the present respectively). Detailed stocking information for 2012-2016 was provided since this year's harvest of all species, except lake trout, will be based primarily on fish stocked in those years. For example, this year's coho catch will depend largely on yearling coho stocked in 2016. The pattern for brown trout tends to be similar to coho. The catches of rainbow (steelhead) trout this year will result for the most part from yearling fish stocked from 2010-2014. Chinook catches this year depend primarily on Chinooks stocked in 2014-2016. The lake trout catch, unlike the other species, will depend strongly on fish stocked in 2009 and earlier. A grid map of Lake Michigan (Figure 1) is included to assist you in locating stocking sites. The ages of fish at time of stocking are indicated as fingerling (F), spring fingerling (SF), yearling (Y), or adult (A). Fin clips are coded as single or multiple clips of the following fins and/or mouth parts: adipose (A), dorsal (D), right or left maxillary (RM, LM), right or left pectoral fins (RP, LP), or right or left ventral fins (RV, LV). The acronym CWT used in the summaries stands for coded wire tag, and refers to fish that have a small wire tag inserted into their snouts. All Chinook salmon stocked in the Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan were marked with an adipose clip and a CWT as part of a lakewide effort to determine the rates of natural reproduction in Lake Michigan. A diagram of a Chinook salmon depicting fin and maxillary locations is included with the summary (Figure 2). A strain designation code is included in the fin clip column. Strains are coded as Domestic (D), Seeforellen (S), Lake Michigan (M), Arlee (A), Chambers Creek (C) and Ganaraska (G). 2016 Stocking Overview: Lakewide Chinook salmon stocking numbers were reduced by 50% starting in 2013 based on agreements with other management agencies on Lake Michigan. This agreement was forged to balance the number of predators with available prey. The actual number of Chinook salmon stocked in 2016 exceeded our proposed objective of 810,000 by approximately 2,300 fish. The number of brown trout stocked in 2016 exceeded our proposed objective of 836,000 by approximately 185,000 fish. This was due to all of the brown trout at the Thunder River Rearing Station being stocked out prior to that facility closing. Stocking of steelhead exceeded the production goal of 390,000 by approximately 7,000 fish. Coho salmon stocking fell short of our objective of 500,000 by approximately 42,000. Lake trout stocking by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fell short of expectations by approximately 37,000 fish. 1 WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY SPECIES YEAR BROOK BROWN CHINOOK COHO LAKE1 STEELHEAD TIGER2 1963 9,000 1964 15,000 1965 205,000 25,000 1966 38,000 761,000 59,000 1967 9,000 48,000 1,129,000 85,000 1968 25,000 252,000 25,000 817,000 104,000 1969 34,000 132,000 66,000 175,000 884,000 169,000 1970 18,000 183,000 119,000 332,000 900,000 143,000 1971 69,000 208,000 264,000 265,000 945,000 168,000 1972 70,000 811,000 317,000 258,000 1,284,000 618,000 1973 50,000 558,000 757,000 570,000 1,170,000 661,000 1974 34,000 435,000 616,000 318,000 971,000 495,000 34,000 1975 61,000 362,000 825,000 453,000 1,054,000 508,000 15,000 1976 19,000 298,000 1,175,000 667,000 1,045,000 1,010,000 23,000 1977 623,000 798,000 872,000 492,000 970,000 673,000 28,000 1978 243,000 1,228,000 2,017,000 499,000 994,000 616,000 1979 185,000 955,000 2,064,000 320,000 943,000 1,133,000 1980 185,000 1,063,000 2,430,000 492,000 1,255,000 1,167,000 SPLAKE3 1981 200,000 1,014,000 1,848,000 318,000 831,000 965,000 1982 245,000 1,841,000 2,345,000 216,000 1,022,000 1,042,000 1983 297,000 1,588,000 2,432,000 356,000 720,000 1,404,000 20,000 1984 225,000 1,185,000 2,892,000 551,000 736,000 1,381,000 34,000 1985 307,000 1,170,000 2,740,000 522,000 1,589,000 415,000 54,000 1986 188,000 873,000 2,378,000 267,000 1,394,000 782,000 115,000 1987 95,000 838,000 2,263,000 624,000 1,066,000 544,000 0 1988 +497,000 1,050,000 1,409,000 1,020,000 736,000 291,000 29,000 1989 +150,000 973,000 2,714,000 511,000 1,827,000 495,000 0 1990 315,000 1,229,000 2,379,000 498,000 700,000 461,000 0 1991 326,000 982,000 1,735,000 403,000 1,009,000 587,000 147,000 1992 272,000 1,229,000 1,523,000 569,000 1,323,000 569,000 0 1993 294,000 1,333,000 1,600,000 0 633,000 679,000 40,000 1994 269,000 1,261,000 1,549,000 457,000 758,000 798,000 71,700 1995 328,000 1,325,000 1,688,000 722,000 581,000 553,000 0 1996 167,794 1,301,118 1,726,957 563,588 685,000 565,980 69,912 1997 114,530 1,279,830 1,706,116 514,712 670,850 569,950 40,000 1998 297,705 1,252,035 1,729,799 513,894 745,850 531,032 22,000 1999 179,169 1,226,947 1,467,955 529,224 717,701 518,851 40,000 2 WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY SPECIES YEAR BROOK BROWN CHINOOK COHO LAKE1 STEELHEAD SPLAKE3 2000 44,580 1,231,807 1,487,771 484,662 682,046 520,810 40,000 2001 89,500 1,197,502 1,502,607 512,774 778,470 600,525 28,471 2002 50,388 1,365,896 1,419,303 595,491 620,110 610,617 28,509 2003 23,877 1,080,538 1,614,700 540,145 724,774 758,275 22,086 2004 0 1,021,711 1,502,885 474,465 743,190 430,601 43,859 2005 0 967,114 1,474,456 515,978 713,493 553,861 16,259 2006 0 994,914 1,166,185 437,744 830,647 578,444 40,028 2007 0 1,010,111 1,112,562 643,065 714,652 705,064 44,272 2008 0 966,278 724,545 282,910 1,015,513 536,510 0 2009 0 934,420 995,804 344,471 930,671 636,329 0 2010 40,546 735,472 1,234,994 345,464 738,549 446,247 0 2011 0 704,604 1,127,444 433,196 866,095 436,381 0 2012 0 722,541 1,175,213 542,192 703,349 398,520 0 2013 0 726,096 802,061 383,339 819,360 410,919 0 2014 0 588,629 823,222 421,100 824,530 409,121 0 2015 0 820,954 823,496 539,129 809,103 432,665 0 2016 0 1,020,852 812,270 457,884 712,377 397,162 0 Proposed 2017 0 362,000 810,000 450,000 300,000 390,000 0 1Federally produced fish. 2Brook X Brown Hybrid. 3Brook X Lake Hybrid. +In addition to the above, 17,000 Atlantic Salmon (Landlocked) were stocked in 1988 and 30,000 were stocked in 1989. 3 2012 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY COUNTY BROOK BROWN CHINOOK COHO LAKE STEELHEAD KENOSHA 0 49,583 157,854 34,600 0 25,092 RACINE 0 54,557 112,616 86,121 27,216 54,029 MILWAUKEE 0 119,153 99,804 42,376 7,176 45,780 OZAUKEE 0 41,488 83,646 64,119 400,069 5,801 SHEBOYGAN 0 61,294 83,918 63,563 203,128 35,525 MANITOWOC 0 105,128 129,200 37,557 0 55,631 KEWAUNEE 0 65,179 132,243 198,364 15,000 104,083 DOOR 0 132,330* 226,842 15,492 50,760 43,518 OCONTO 0 93,829 0 0 0 0 MARINETTE 0 0** 58,283 0 0 12,801 TOTAL 0 722,541 1,175,213 542,192 703,349 398,520 2013 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY COUNTY BROOK BROWN CHINOOK COHO LAKE STEELHEAD KENOSHA 0 53,271 74,996 14,310 0 4,719 RACINE 0 51,955 75,046 83,608 24,450 86,627 MILWAUKEE 0 70,713 74,655 14,348 0 31,172 OZAUKEE 0 43,474 63,488 41,011 309,900 36,437 SHEBOYGAN 0 66,783 63,593 30,892 309,358 17,743 MANITOWOC 0 91,581 91,964 9,817 0 57,838 KEWAUNEE 0 92,634 91,855 180,023 124,505 95,461 DOOR 0 162,800* 185,297 9,330 51,147 52,818 GREEN BAY 0 90,324** 0 0 0 0 OCONTO 0 0 61,164 0 0 12,427 MARINETTE 0 2,561 20,003 0 0 15,677 TOTAL 0 726,096 802,061 383,339 819,360 410,919 4 2014 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY COUNTY BROOK BROWN CHINOOK COHO LAKE STEELHEAD KENOSHA 0 50,225 77,463 18,760 0 26,882 RACINE 0 47,330 76,933 79,080 139,650 56,723 MILWAUKEE 0 54,446 83,414 18,886 0 57,102 OZAUKEE 0 44,486 90,076 45,393 309,492 4,663 SHEBOYGAN 0 44,358 86,337 64,807 310,388 34,729 MANITOWOC 0 76,804 85,205 13,970 0 59,232 KEWAUNEE 0 61,389 99,477 152,039 15,000 98,391 DOOR 0 160,914* 153,617 28,165 50,000 43,100 GREEN BAY 0 48,577** 0 0 0 0 OCONTO 0 0 42,249 0 0 12,602 MARINETTE 0 0 28,451 0 0 15,697 TOTAL 0 588,529 823,222 421,100 824,530 409,121 * 36,079 Seeforellen yearlings stocked through the ice at Stone Quarry/Green Bay side of Door County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary
    Watershed Restoration Plan Menomonee River Chapter 1: Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) is to identify specific actions that can be implemented between 2010 and 2015 to improve water quality within the Menomonee River and its tributaries and present general recommendations for activity beyond 2015. These actions have been identified based upon a consideration of many factors, including overall effectiveness, scientific underpinning, regulatory considerations, and stakeholder goals. This WRP describes the characteristics of the Menomonee River and its watershed, focusing on those topics that are directly related to implementation (Figure 1-1). Information provided includes existing (Baseline Year 2000) and Year 2020 land uses, Baseline Year 2000 and Year 2020 water quality conditions, and the most significant sources of pollution. Water quality goals selected by the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (SWWT), based upon scientific, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations, are also presented and explained, as are the load reductions that will be needed to meet those goals. The reductions are based upon projected loads for the Year 2020 and as such account for future growth. This WRP is the culmination of historical and recent activity to protect and restore water quality within the greater Milwaukee region. Most significantly, it builds upon the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU) and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) 2020 Facilities Plan and incorporates the input from members of the SWWT and its associated Menomonee River Watershed Action Team (WAT) and Science Committee. 1.2 Key Elements of the Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan This WRP follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for developing effective watershed plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Menominee River Fishing Report
    Menominee River Fishing Report Which Grove schedules so arbitrarily that Jefferey free-lance her desecration? Ravil club his woggle evidence incongruously or chattily after Bengt modellings and gaugings glossarially, surrendered and staid. Hybridizable Sauncho sometimes ballast any creeks notarizing horridly. Other menominee river fishing report for everyone to increase your game fish. Wisconsin Outdoor news Fishing Hunting Report May 31 2019. State Department for Natural Resources said decree Lower Menominee River that. Use of interest and rivers along the general recommendations, trent meant going tubing fun and upcoming sturgeon. The most reports are gobbling and catfish below its way back in the charts? Saginaw river fishing for many great lakes and parking lot of the banks and october mature kokanee tackle warehouse banner here is. Clinton river fishing report for fish without a privately owned and hopefully bring up with minnows between grand river in vilas county railway north boundary between the! Forty Mine proposal on behalf of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin. Get fish were reported in menominee rivers, report tough task give you in the! United states fishing continues to the reporting is built our rustic river offers a government contracts, down the weirdest town. Information is done nothing is the bait recipe that were slow for world of reaching key box on the wolf river canyon colorado river and wolves. Fishing Reports and Discussions for Menasha Dam Winnebago County. How many hooks can being have capture one line? The river reports is burnt popcorn smell bad weather, female bass tournament. The river reports and sea? Video opens in fishing report at home to mariners and docks are reported during first, nickajack lake erie.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Permit to Discharge Under the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
    Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 1 of 30 STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE WISCONSIN POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of Chapter 283, Wisconsin Statutes, and chs. NR 151 and NR 216, Wisconsin Administrative Code, the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees : City of Brookfield City of Milwaukee Village of Butler Milwaukee County Village of Elm Grove City of West Allis Village of Germantown Village of West Milwaukee City of Greenfield City of Wauwatosa Village of Menomonee Falls are permitted to discharge storm water from ALL PORTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS Owned or operated by the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees to waters of the state in watersheds of the Menomonee River, Fox River, Kinnickinnic River, Root River, and Cedar Creek in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. This permit takes effect on the date of signature. This permit to discharge expires at midnight, December 1, 2017 To retain authorization to discharge after this expiration date, an application shall be filed for reissuance of this permit in accordance with the requirements of s. NR 216.09, Wis. Adm. Code, at least 180 days prior to this expiration date. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources For the Secretary By Bryan Hartsook Water Resources Engineer Date of Signature EFFECTIVE DATE/START DATE: November 30, 2012 EXPIRATION DATE: December 1, 2017 Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 2 of 30 Part I. APPLICABILITY The Menomonee River Watershed Permittees own and operate municipal separate storm sewer systems that discharge to waters of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan
    Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan City of Mequon, Wisconsin January 2014 Page intentionally left blank Mequon Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan 11333 N. Cedarburg Rd Mequon, WI 53092-1930 Phone: 262/236-2918 Fax: 262/242-9655 www.ci.mequon.wi.us Office of the Parks & Operations Director January 13, 2014 Dan Abendroth, Mayor Mequon Common Council 11333 North Cedarburg Road Mequon, WI 53092 Dear Mayor Abendroth & Common Council, The City of Mequon Park Board submits for your review the 2013 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan. In 1991 the Park Board prepared the first Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan which was adopted by the Common Council and used as a guide for acquisition and development of needed park space in the City of Mequon. Every five years since the first Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan was submitted the Park Board has provided updated versions that were adopted by the Common Council. All of the recent plans have been a valuable resource for planning and guiding park acquisition and development. The adoption and implementation of the following document will qualify the City of Mequon for funding assistance from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. More importantly this plan will insure completion of an integrated park system that will provide a wide range of recreational opportunities for Mequon residents, while enhancing the overall quality of life in our Community. The Mequon Park Board is pleased to have been of assistance to the City of Mequon in preparation of the new Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Menomonee Valley: a Historical Overview
    The Menomonee Valley: A Historical Overview by John Gurda The Menomonee Valley has been one of Milwaukee’s distinguishing features since long before the dawn of urban time. Four miles long and a half-mile wide, it was formed by meltwater during the retreat of the last continental glacier, which departed Wisconsin roughly 10,000 years ago. Although the Valley’s topography varied from year to year and even from season to season, it was generally a sprawling expanse of open water punctuated by beds of wild rice and dense mats of cattails, rushes, and reeds. Writing in 1875, pioneer historian James Buck described the Valley east of Fifth Street as “a wild rice swamp, covered with water from two to six feet in depth; in fact an impassable marsh.” The Valley was not impassable to native canoes. It was, in fact, a storehouse of resources that attracted human settlement centuries before anyone contemplated a city. The Menomonee River provided a canoe route from Lake Michigan to the interior, but far more important were the plants and animals it supported. Wild rice was a critically important food source for the procession of tribes who made their homes in the area. (The name “Menomonee” itself is derived from the word for wild rice.) Wetland plants provided the raw materials for baskets, mats, and shelters. Fish and waterfowl were abundant. James Buck penned a verdant description of the Valley in the 1830s: “All the marsh proper … would, in the Spring, be literally alive with fish that came in from the lake…. And the number of ducks that covered the marsh was beyond all computation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Menomonee Valley a Window to Milwaukee’S Past and a Projection of Its Future
    The Menomonee Valley A Window to Milwaukee’s Past and a Projection of its Future Joseph Zagrodnik University of Wisconsin-Madison History 460, Section 307 24 November 2008 2 The one constant through the Menomonee Valley’s past has been its river. Of course, the river and everything around it has gone through astounding changes in the last few centuries, but the valley has always facilitated the flow of the Menomonee River on the final leg of its journey to Lake Michigan. Along this final path, specifically from Wisconsin Avenue to 27th street, the river passes some of the most striking symbols of Milwaukee’s past, present, and future which connect like nowhere else in the city. In this stretch, a baseball stadium and its vast parking lots pass by while a business park sits just behind the lots. Further down the river, two old smokestacks serve as the centerpiece to a new park, with steel trusses, manufacturing plants, and railroads in the background. At first, there may not seem to be much connection between these landmarks, but a closer look reveals that is the collision of these contrasting symbols in the geographical center of Milwaukee that makes the Menomonee Valley so remarkable. The economic initiatives represented by the smokestacks once contrasted with the ecological attributes still symbolized in the parks and river that first made the valley attractive to settlers. The impact of economic growth on the valley’s ecology is vital to understanding why the Menomonee Valley and the City of Milwaukee remain connected to this date. As the constant in the valley, the river is the best place to examine these changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring on the Little Menomonee River System
    Water Quality Monitoring in Ozaukee County Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources River Protection Planning Grant RP31018 Final Report Prepared By: Ozaukee County Planning and Parks Department 121 W. Main Street Port Washington, WI 53074 June 30, 2020 Draft Final Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Project Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 10 Monitoring Design ................................................................................................................................ 10 Monitoring Locations ............................................................................................................................ 11 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 16 General Water Quality Sampling Method Requirements & Quality Assurance/Quality Control .......... 16 Discrete Water Quality Sampling Methods ........................................................................................ 16 Continuous Water Quality Sampling Methods ................................................................................... 18 Additional Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 20 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Underwood Creek Great
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDERWOOD CREEK GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN Underwood Creek approximately 0.25 miles upstream from the Menomonee River September 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers® Detroit District ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDERWOOD CREEK GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN Responsible Office: Detroit District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Analysis Branch 477 Michigan Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226-2550 ABSTRACT This document addresses the environmental impacts associated with an aquatic ecosystem restoration project on Underwood Creek in Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. The proposed project is being conducted under the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program, which is authorized by Section 506 of the Water Resources and Development Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-541). The proposed action involves the removal of approximately 4400 linear feet of concrete lined channel along Underwood Creek, to support the restoration of the fishery, the aquatic ecosystem, and aquatic habitat. Improvements will result from the construction of a boulder and stone lined main channel with riffles and pools that will provide spawning habitat and fish passage to upstream areas that are currently blocked by the concrete channel lining and drop structures. The project will provide access for fish from Lake Michigan and the Menomonee River into the lower 1.25 miles of Underwood Creek. In the future, this connectivity is expected to extend into the upper reaches of Underwood Creek as the MMSD pursues removal of concrete drop structures that block fish passage into quality spawning habitats farther upstream. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant short term, long term or cumulative adverse environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Ozaukee County Board Regular Meeting Wednesday, October 7, 2020 – 9:00 Am Administration Center - Room A-204 121 W
    AGENDA OZAUKEE COUNTY BOARD REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2020 – 9:00 AM ADMINISTRATION CENTER - ROOM A-204 121 W. MAIN STREET, PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074 THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS WILL BE BEFORE THE COUNTY BOARD FOR INITIATION, DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION, DELIBERATION AND POSSIBLE FORMAL ACTION: The public can access the meeting by viewing the live stream at the link which will be opened five minutes before the call to order: County Board Meeting Live Stream 1. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 2 and 16, 2020 4. PUBLIC COMMENT Legislative Update Chairperson's Proclamation 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. CLAIMS 7. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT County Administrator's Report - September 2020 2020 Fiscal Update 2021 Budget Update Strategic Planning Update Solar Now Project Update 8. NON-COMMENDATION RESOLUTIONS RES.20-36: Increase of Revenue 2020 - Public Health; Information Technology RES.20-37: Amending Section 2.03(8) and 2.05 (2) of the Ozaukee County Policy and Procedure Manual Regarding Change in Language for Session per Resolution No. 20-34 RES.20-38: Submittal and Acceptance of a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Land Acquisition Grant for Acquisition of the Clay Bluffs Cedar Gorge Nature Preserve as Part of the Ozaukee County Park System RES.20-39: Submittal and Acceptance of a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Management – Surface Water Restoration Wetland Incentive Grant to Support Stormwater Management, Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
    [Show full text]
  • Menominee River Fishing Report
    Menominee River Fishing Report Justis misassigns pushing. Smeared and caller Vachel edulcorated some succinates so irrepressibly! Sharp-set Nikos never hyalinizing so impenetrably or sectarianises any journeys vexedly. FISHING wcub. Typically the Fox River in start Bay is the first river for the spawn to occur assemble the trend works its not north side the Oconto Peshtigo and lastly the Menominee. The river reports, silver spoons had homes. EPA Reports Bibliography A Listing of EPA Reports Available. Lake Michigan Outdoor Fishing Report February 1 2021. Scope and river reported on the report for another popular pastime throughout door. Kentucky fishing reports lake information and fishing tips for Kentucky lakes. Lower Menominee River AOC Fisheries Data Roundup Final. Reporting seeing more and nitrogen species of fish said Milwaukee. 906 Fishing Report 906 Outdoors. Spawn chinook salmon, wisconsin and develop robust trout have been hunting and river but workers and! Fishing Cameras Wisconsin Fishing Reports. 5 Menominee River Wisconsin 1 Erik Lennartz with his largest ever river smallmouth bass a 6 pounder caught below the Menominee River. DNR Fishing Report 0322019 Local jail record-eagle. Karachay in menominee rivers, report has reported fair number of reports and maximum penalties and lake! Council OKs Tourist Booth Lease Firefighter Gets Building Report. Au sable river reported very strong north carolina resorts are. Bass Fishing Videos discoteche milano marittima cervia. Where get the fish biting in Wisconsin? By breed page available via the fuse holder, otter and river menominee fishing report for? Onondaga Lake D There are cost of rivers in the tow but direct of lightning these days.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001
    The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001 A report by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the Milwaukee River Basin Land and Water Partners Team and other stakeholders GOVERNOR Scott McCallum NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Trygve A. Solberg, Chair James E. Tiefenthaler, Jr., Vice-Chair Gerald M. O'Brien, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Howard D. Poulson Catherine L. Stepp Stephen D. Willett Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Franc Fennessy, Deputy Secretary Barbara Zellmer, Executive Assistant Gene Fransisco, Administrator Division of Forestry Steve Miller, Administrator Division of Land Susan L. Sylvester, Administrator Division of Water Gloria McCutcheon, Director Southeast Regional Office Frank Trcka, Land Leader Charles Krohn, Water Leader Southeast Regional Office The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001 A publication of the Department of Natural Resources Scott McCallum, Governor Southeast Region Headquarters Darrell Bazzell, Secretary 2300 N. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Gloria L. McCutcheon, Regional Director PO Box 12436 Milwaukee, WI, Wisconsin 53212 Telephone 414-263-8500 FAX 414-263-8716 TTY 414-263-8713 To: Recipients of The State of the Milwaukee River Basin Report We are pleased to present our first State of the Milwaukee River Basin report. This report provides an overview of land and water resource quality, identifies challenges facing these resources, and outlines actions the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and its many partners can take over the next few years to protect and restore our natural resources throughout the Milwaukee River Basin. This report is organized into land and water sections for simplicity, but shows how all our resources are closely linked.
    [Show full text]
  • Menomonee River Watersheds Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010
    Wisconsin Menomonee River Watersheds Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010 Th e Menomonee River Watershed covers 136 square miles in portions of Washington, Ozaukee, Waukesha and Milwaukee counties. Th e river originates in the Village of German- town and the City of Mequon and fl ows in a southeasterly direction for about 32 miles before it meets the Milwaukee and Kinnick- Contents innic Rivers in the Milwaukee Milwaukee Harbor Estuary. Th e watershed contains 96 Watershed Details . 1 total stream miles and 4,537 wetland acres. Population and Land Use . 1 Hydrology . 2 Ecological Landscapes . 3 Historical Note . 3 Map 1: Menomonee Watershed Water Condition . 4 Watershed Details Point & Nonpoint Pollution Issues . 4 Population and Land Use River and Stream Quality . 4 The Menomonee River watershed Wetlands . 5 is very densely populated (2367 Lakes . 6 persons per square mile) when Aquatic Invasive Species . .6 compared to the State of Wisconsin Impaired Waters. .6 as a whole (99 persons per square Recent Planning Eff orts . .8 mile). Between 1990 and 2000, the Monitoring Studies . .9 population in the watershed has re- mained around 322,000 individuals, Water Actions . 4 but the number of household units Watershed Program Grants . .9 has increased by 3.5% to 129,736 Stream Specifi c Recommendations . .9 dwellings (SEWRPC 2007a). So, even Watershed Recommendations . .9 though the number of residents in the basin was stable, urban growth Figure 1: Land Use Menomonee Watershed was increasing. The watershed spans Appendices . 11 four counties, nine cities, six villages Watershed Map . 11 and four towns.
    [Show full text]