Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Salmonid Stocking Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

WISCONSIN’S LAKE MICHIGAN

SALMONID STOCKING PROGRAM

Prepared: June 2017
By
Thomas Burzynski

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
600 E. Greenfield Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204

PUB-FH-828 2017

WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

Prepared by Thomas Burzynski
Lake Michigan Fisheries Work Unit Milwaukee – UW WATER Institute
Department of Natural Resources

This stocking summary is based on stocking records entered by Wisconsin DNR staff into the statewide propagation database. A stocking record was generated each time hatchery fish were stocked into Lake Michigan.

There are four types of information included in this summary report. First, total numbers of trout and salmon stocked from 1963-2016 are summarized. The numbers of trout and salmon that were requested for stocking during the current year (2017) are also included. The actual numbers of each species of fish stocked this year will depend on hatchery program production. The first summary (pages 2 and 3) is intended to provide an overview of long-term trends in the stocking of each species.

The last three sets of summaries account for fish stocked during 2012-2016. The second set (pages 4 - 7) focuses on the numbers of fish stocked in each county along the Lake Michigan shoreline in 2012-2016. The third summary (pages 9 - 28) is a set of tables detailing specific stocking sites, the grid location of each stocking site, the specific number and age of fish planted at each site, and any identifying fin clips or marks. The fourth summary (pages 30 - 33) focuses on the marked trout and salmon stocked during the past five years (marked lake trout and steelhead are listed from 2005 and 2008 to the present respectively).

Detailed stocking information for 2012-2016 was provided since this year's harvest of all species, except lake trout, will be based primarily on fish stocked in those years. For example, this year's coho catch will depend largely on yearling coho stocked in 2016. The pattern for brown trout tends to be similar to coho. The catches of rainbow (steelhead) trout this year will result for the most part from yearling fish stocked from 2010-2014. Chinook catches this year depend primarily on Chinooks stocked in 2014-2016. The lake trout catch, unlike the other species, will depend strongly on fish stocked in 2009 and earlier.

A grid map of Lake Michigan (Figure 1) is included to assist you in locating stocking sites. The ages of fish at time of stocking are indicated as fingerling (F), spring fingerling (SF), yearling (Y), or adult (A). Fin clips are coded as single or multiple clips of the following fins and/or mouth parts: adipose (A), dorsal (D), right or left maxillary (RM, LM), right or left pectoral fins (RP, LP), or right or left ventral fins (RV, LV). The acronym CWT used in the summaries stands for coded wire tag, and refers to fish that have a small wire tag inserted into their snouts. All Chinook salmon stocked in the Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan were marked with an adipose clip and a CWT as part of a lakewide effort to determine the rates of natural reproduction in Lake Michigan. A diagram of a Chinook salmon depicting fin and maxillary locations is included with the summary (Figure 2).

A strain designation code is included in the fin clip column. Strains are coded as Domestic (D), Seeforellen (S), Lake Michigan (M), Arlee (A), Chambers Creek (C) and Ganaraska (G).

2016 Stocking Overview:

Lakewide Chinook salmon stocking numbers were reduced by 50% starting in 2013 based on agreements with other management agencies on Lake Michigan. This agreement was forged to balance the number of predators with available prey. The actual number of Chinook salmon stocked in 2016 exceeded our proposed objective of 810,000 by approximately 2,300 fish. The number of brown trout stocked in 2016 exceeded our proposed objective of 836,000 by approximately 185,000 fish. This was due to all of the brown trout at the Thunder River Rearing Station being stocked out prior to that facility closing. Stocking of steelhead exceeded the production goal of 390,000 by approximately 7,000 fish. Coho salmon stocking fell short of our objective of 500,000 by approximately 42,000. Lake trout stocking by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fell short of expectations by approximately 37,000 fish.

1

WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY
SPECIES

  • YEAR
  • BROOK
  • BROWN
  • CHINOOK
  • COHO
  • LAKE1 STEELHEAD
  • TIGER2

1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
9,000
15,000 25,000 59,000 85,000
205,000 761,000
1,129,000
817,000 884,000 900,000 945,000
1,284,000 1,170,000
971,000
1,054,000 1,045,000
970,000 994,000 943,000
1,255,000
831,000
1,022,000
720,000 736,000
1,589,000 1,394,000 1,066,000
736,000
1,827,000
700,000
1,009,000 1,323,000
633,000 758,000 581,000 685,000 670,850 745,850 717,701
38,000 48,000
252,000 132,000 183,000 208,000 811,000 558,000 435,000 362,000 298,000 798,000
1,228,000
955,000
1,063,000 1,014,000 1,841,000 1,588,000 1,185,000 1,170,000
873,000 838,000
1,050,000
973,000
9,000
25,000 34,000 18,000 69,000 70,000 50,000 34,000 61,000
25,000
175,000 332,000 265,000 258,000 570,000 318,000 453,000 667,000 492,000 499,000 320,000 492,000 318,000 216,000 356,000 551,000 522,000 267,000 624,000
1,020,000
511,000 498,000 403,000 569,000
0
104,000 169,000 143,000 168,000 618,000 661,000 495,000 508,000
1,010,000
673,000 616,000
1,133,000
66,000
119,000 264,000 317,000 757,000 616,000 825,000
1,175,000
872,000
2,017,000 2,064,000 2,430,000 1,848,000 2,345,000 2,432,000 2,892,000 2,740,000 2,378,000 2,263,000 1,409,000 2,714,000 2,379,000 1,735,000 1,523,000 1,600,000 1,549,000 1,688,000 1,726,957 1,706,116 1,729,799 1,467,955
34,000 15,000 23,000 28,000
19,000
623,000 243,000 185,000 185,000 200,000 245,000 297,000 225,000 307,000 188,000
95,000
+497,000 +150,000
315,000 326,000 272,000 294,000 269,000 328,000 167,794 114,530 297,705 179,169

1,167,000 SPLAKE3

965,000
1,042,000 1,404,000 1,381,000
415,000 782,000 544,000 291,000 495,000 461,000 587,000 569,000 679,000 798,000 553,000 565,980 569,950 531,032 518,851
20,000 34,000 54,000
115,000
0
29,000
0
1,229,000
982,000
0
147,000
0
40,000 71,700
0
69,912 40,000 22,000 40,000
1,229,000 1,333,000 1,261,000 1,325,000 1,301,118 1,279,830 1,252,035 1,226,947
457,000 722,000 563,588 514,712 513,894 529,224

2

WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY
SPECIES

  • YEAR
  • BROOK
  • BROWN
  • CHINOOK
  • COHO
  • LAKE1 STEELHEAD
  • SPLAKE3

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
44,580 89,500 50,388 23,877
1,231,807 1,197,502 1,365,896 1,080,538 1,021,711
967,114 994,914
1,010,111
966,278 934,420 735,472 704,604 722,541 726,096 588,629 820,954
1,020,852
1,487,771 1,502,607 1,419,303 1,614,700 1,502,885 1,474,456 1,166,185 1,112,562
724,545
484,662 512,774 595,491 540,145 474,465 515,978 437,744 643,065 282,910 344,471 345,464 433,196 542,192 383,339 421,100 539,129 457,884
682,046 778,470 620,110 724,774 743,190 713,493 830,647 714,652
1,015,513
930,671 738,549 866,095 703,349 819,360 824,530 809,103 712,377
520,810 600,525 610,617 758,275 430,601 553,861 578,444 705,064 536,510 636,329 446,247 436,381 398,520 410,919 409,121 432,665 397,162
40,000 28,471 28,509 22,086 43,859 16,259 40,028 44,272
000000
000000000
995,804

  • 40,546
  • 1,234,994

1,127,444 1,175,213
802,061 823,222 823,496
00000

  • 0
  • 812,270

Proposed

  • 2017
  • 0
  • 362,000
  • 810,000
  • 450,000
  • 300,000
  • 390,000
  • 0

1Federally produced fish. 2Brook X Brown Hybrid. 3Brook X Lake Hybrid. +In addition to the above, 17,000 Atlantic Salmon (Landlocked) were stocked in 1988 and 30,000 were stocked in 1989.

3

2012 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • COUNTY
  • BROOK
  • BROWN

49,583 54,557
119,153
41,488 61,294
105,128
65,179
132,330*
93,829

CHINOOK

157,854 112,616
99,804 83,646 83,918
129,200 132,243 226,842
0

COHO

34,600 86,121 42,376 64,119 63,563 37,557
198,364
15,492
0

LAKE STEELHEAD
KENOSHA RACINE

000000000
0
27,216
7,176
400,069 203,128
0
25,092 54,029 45,780
5,801

MILWAUKEE OZAUKEE SHEBOYGAN MANITOWOC KEWAUNEE DOOR

35,525 55,631
104,083
43,518
0
15,000 50,760
0

OCONTO MARINETTE TOTAL

00

  • 0**
  • 58,283
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12,801

  • 722,541
  • 1,175,213
  • 542,192
  • 703,349
  • 398,520

2013 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • COUNTY
  • BROOK
  • BROWN

53,271 51,955 70,713 43,474 66,783 91,581 92,634
162,800* 90,324**
0

CHINOOK

74,996 75,046 74,655 63,488 63,593 91,964 91,855
185,297
0

COHO

14,310 83,608 14,348 41,011 30,892
9,817
180,023
9,330
0

LAKE STEELHEAD
KENOSHA RACINE

0000000000
0
24,450
0
4,719
86,627 31,172 36,437 17,743 57,838 95,461 52,818
0

MILWAUKEE OZAUKEE SHEBOYGAN MANITOWOC KEWAUNEE DOOR

309,900 309,358
0
124,505
51,147
0

GREEN BAY OCONTO

  • 61,164
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12,427

MARINETTE TOTAL

00

  • 2,561
  • 20,003
  • 0
  • 0
  • 15,677

  • 726,096
  • 802,061
  • 383,339
  • 819,360
  • 410,919

4

2014 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • COUNTY
  • BROOK
  • BROWN

50,225 47,330 54,446 44,486 44,358 76,804 61,389
160,914* 48,577**
0

CHINOOK

77,463 76,933 83,414 90,076 86,337 85,205 99,477
153,617
0

COHO

18,760 79,080 18,886 45,393 64,807 13,970
152,039
28,165
0

LAKE STEELHEAD
KENOSHA RACINE

0000000000
0
139,650
0
26,882 56,723 57,102
4,663
34,729 59,232 98,391 43,100
0

MILWAUKEE OZAUKEE SHEBOYGAN MANITOWOC KEWAUNEE DOOR

309,492 310,388
0
15,000 50,000
0

GREEN BAY OCONTO

  • 42,249
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12,602

MARINETTE TOTAL

00

  • 0
  • 28,451
  • 0
  • 0
  • 15,697

  • 588,529
  • 823,222
  • 421,100
  • 824,530
  • 409,121

* 36,079 Seeforellen yearlings stocked through the ice at Stone Quarry/Green Bay side of Door County. 50,326 Seeforellen yearlings stocked offshore in the open waters of Green Bay off of Door County.

** Stocked offshore in the open waters of Green Bay off of Marinette.

2012

* 28,257 Seeforellen yearlings stocked through the ice at Stone Quarry/Green Bay side of Door County. ** Brown trout quotas for Oconto and Marinette counties stocked in the open waters of Green Bay.

2013

* 30,076 Seeforellen yearlings stocked through the ice at Stone Quarry/Green Bay side of Door County. **Stocked offshore in the open waters of Green Bay off of Marinette.

5

2015 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • COUNTY
  • BROOK
  • BROWN

74,718 85,312 87,220 58,247 60,243
108,878 116,478
120,921*
108,937**
0

CHINOOK

78,401 77,760 84,132 96,100 85,433 84,900 96,451
152,356
0

COHO

30,224 93,023 29,366 73,741 70,398 63,223
158,027
21,127
0

LAKE STEELHEAD
KENOSHA RACINE

0000000000
0
28,420
0
4,661
93,508 43,177 36,991 22,602 60,342 98,597 41,638
0

MILWAUKEE OZAUKEE SHEBOYGAN MANITOWOC KEWAUNEE DOOR

310,006 310,211 110,260
0
50,206
0

GREEN BAY OCONTO

  • 26,595
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13,344

MARINETTE TOTAL

00

  • 0
  • 41,368
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17,805

  • 820,954
  • 823,496
  • 539,129
  • 809,103
  • 432,665

* 29,630 Seeforellen yearlings stocked through the ice at Stone Quarry/Green Bay side of Door County.

** Stocked offshore in the open waters of Green Bay off of Marinette.

6

2016 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • COUNTY
  • BROOK
  • BROWN
  • CHINOOK

76,627 76,270 84,728 90,015 84,560 84,050 95,327
151,557
0

COHO

26,543 70,031 25,246 58,132 56,729 16,811
191,069
13,323
0

LAKE STEELHEAD
KENOSHA RACINE

00000000000

  • 81,203
  • 0

25,657
0
28,688 55,352 51,233
4,387
33,626 54,825 98,307 41,687
0
105,166 113,029
67,878

MILWAUKEE OZAUKEE SHEBOYGAN MANITOWOC KEWAUNEE DOOR

310,520 309,780
0
74,178
140,403 114,912 135,708
90,812*
10,412
15,660 50,760
0

GREEN BAY OCONTO

  • 27,151
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12,551

MARINETTE TOTAL

  • 87,151
  • 41,985
  • 0
  • 0
  • 16,506

  • 1,020,852
  • 812,270
  • 457,884
  • 712,377
  • 397,162

*42,397 Seeforellen yearlings stocked offshore in the open waters of Green Bay off of Door County and 48,415 Seeforellen yearlings stocked offshore off of Marinette.

7

Figure 1. Lake Michigan statistical grids

8

2012 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • LOCATION
  • GRID
  • NUMBER
  • AGE
  • FIN CLIP

BROWN TROUT

Detroit Harbor Detroit Harbor
607 607 607 607 703 703 706 706 804 804 905 905 905
1004 1004 1004 1104 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1502 1502 1502 1701 1701 1901 1901 1901 1901 2102 2102 2202 2202
8,325 9,511 5,361
FYYYYYYYYYFYYYYYYYFYYYYYFYYYYFYYYYYYY
None None None None None None None None None ARV None None None None None None ARV None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None ARV
(D) (S) (D) (D) (D) (S) (D) (S) (S) (S) (D) (D) (S) (D) (S) (D) (S) (D) (D) (D) (S) (D) (S) (S) (D) (D) (S) (D) (S) (D) (D) (S) (S) (D) (S) (D) (S)
Northport Ferry Dock Rowleys Bay Green Bay Offshore Green Bay Offshore Baileys Harbor Baileys Harbor Stone Quarry Stone Quarry Sturgeon Bay CGS Sturgeon Bay CGS Sturgeon Bay CGS Ahnapee River Ahnapee River Algoma Harbor Kewaunee River East Twin River Manitowoc River Manitowoc River Manitowoc River Two Rivers Harbor Two Rivers Harbor West Twin River Sheboygan Harbor Sheboygan Harbor Sheboygan River Port Washington Harbor Port Washington Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Riverfront Ramp Root River
7,438
46,005 27,540 11,085 11,265 20,284 28,257 20,172
7,897
23,019 13,173 10,047
9,066
32,893
8,338
33,735 19,960 16,028 10,985
9,684 6,398
20,904 18,331 22,059 19,466 22,022 69,500 22,633 18,072
8,948
24,898 29,659 22,551 27,032
Root River Kenosha Harbor Kenosha Harbor
None None

  • TOTAL
  • 722,541

9

2012 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • LOCATION
  • GRID
  • NUMBER
  • AGE
  • FIN CLIP

CHINOOK SALMON

Ellison Bay Menominee River Oconto River
606 703 802 803 905
1104 1104 1303 1303 1502 1701 1701 1901 2102 2202
52,031 59,917 58,283 30,890
174,811
59,763 72,480 70,392 58,808 83,918 41,823 41,823 99,804
112,616 157,854
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT
(M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M)
Peshtigo River Strawberry Creek Ahnapee River Kewaunee River Manitowoc River Two Rivers Harbor Sheboygan River Port Washington Harbor Sauk Creek McKinley Marina – Net pens Root River Pike River

  • TOTAL
  • 1,175,213

COHO SALMON

Northport Ferry Dock Ahnapee River
607
1004 1104 1303 1502 1701 1901 1901 2102 2102 2202
15,492 48,959
149,405
37,557 63,563 64,119 28,622 13,754 75,153 10,968 34,600
YYYYYYYYYYY
None None None None None None None None None None None
(M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M)
Kewaunee River Manitowoc River Sheboygan River Port Washington Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Riverfront Ramp Root River Root River Kenosha Harbor

  • TOTAL
  • 542,192

LAKE TROUT

Sturgeon Bay CGS Kewaunee Harbor Sheboygan Reef Northeast Reef Milwaukee CGS Wind Point
905
1104 1706 1803 1901 2102
50,760 15,000
203,128 400,069
7,176
YYYYYY
A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT A-CWT

  • A-CWT
  • 27,216

  • TOTAL
  • 703,349

10

2012 LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY

  • LOCATION
  • GRID
  • NUMBER
  • AGE
  • FIN CLIP

RAINBOW (STEELHEAD) TROUT

Menominee River Menominee River Baileys Harbor Heins Creek Heins Creek Oconto River
703 703 706 706 706 802 802 803 803 805 805 806 806 905 905 905
1004 1004 1004 1104 1104 1104 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1303 1402 1402 1502 1502 1502 1502 1502 1701 1701 1901 1901 1901 2002 2002
4,239 4,009 9,996 2,207 2,387 6,396 6,405 4,239 3,773 4,414 4,851 2,207 2,387 2,372 2,648
10,049 10,003
4,268 3,958
10,009 38,430 37,415
1,720 2,716 4,239 4,009
10,042
1,682 3,040 2,207 2,651
10,017
4,239 4,009 2,409 2,651 2,443 2,695
19,947
5,285 5,155 2,739 3,062
12,328 13,566 14,726
2,465 2,695
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None LMLV BV None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
(C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (A) (A) (C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G) (C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G) (A) (C) (G) (C) (G)
Oconto River Peshtigo River Peshtigo River Whitefish Bay Creek Whitefish Bay Creek Hibbard Creek Hibbard Creek Stony Creek Stony Creek Sturgeon Bay CGS Ahnapee River Ahnapee River Ahnapee River Kewaunee Harbor Kewaunee River Kewaunee River Branch River Branch River East Twin River East Twin River Manitowoc Harbor Manitowoc River Manitowoc River Silver Creek Silver Creek West Twin River West Twin River West Twin River Fischer Creek Fischer Creek Pigeon River Pigeon River Sheboygan Harbor Sheboygan River Sheboygan River Sauk Creek Sauk Creek Milwaukee Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Milwaukee Harbor Oak Creek Oak Creek

Recommended publications
  • Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary

    Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary

    Watershed Restoration Plan Menomonee River Chapter 1: Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) is to identify specific actions that can be implemented between 2010 and 2015 to improve water quality within the Menomonee River and its tributaries and present general recommendations for activity beyond 2015. These actions have been identified based upon a consideration of many factors, including overall effectiveness, scientific underpinning, regulatory considerations, and stakeholder goals. This WRP describes the characteristics of the Menomonee River and its watershed, focusing on those topics that are directly related to implementation (Figure 1-1). Information provided includes existing (Baseline Year 2000) and Year 2020 land uses, Baseline Year 2000 and Year 2020 water quality conditions, and the most significant sources of pollution. Water quality goals selected by the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (SWWT), based upon scientific, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations, are also presented and explained, as are the load reductions that will be needed to meet those goals. The reductions are based upon projected loads for the Year 2020 and as such account for future growth. This WRP is the culmination of historical and recent activity to protect and restore water quality within the greater Milwaukee region. Most significantly, it builds upon the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU) and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) 2020 Facilities Plan and incorporates the input from members of the SWWT and its associated Menomonee River Watershed Action Team (WAT) and Science Committee. 1.2 Key Elements of the Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan This WRP follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for developing effective watershed plans.
  • Menominee River Fishing Report

    Menominee River Fishing Report

    Menominee River Fishing Report Which Grove schedules so arbitrarily that Jefferey free-lance her desecration? Ravil club his woggle evidence incongruously or chattily after Bengt modellings and gaugings glossarially, surrendered and staid. Hybridizable Sauncho sometimes ballast any creeks notarizing horridly. Other menominee river fishing report for everyone to increase your game fish. Wisconsin Outdoor news Fishing Hunting Report May 31 2019. State Department for Natural Resources said decree Lower Menominee River that. Use of interest and rivers along the general recommendations, trent meant going tubing fun and upcoming sturgeon. The most reports are gobbling and catfish below its way back in the charts? Saginaw river fishing for many great lakes and parking lot of the banks and october mature kokanee tackle warehouse banner here is. Clinton river fishing report for fish without a privately owned and hopefully bring up with minnows between grand river in vilas county railway north boundary between the! Forty Mine proposal on behalf of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin. Get fish were reported in menominee rivers, report tough task give you in the! United states fishing continues to the reporting is built our rustic river offers a government contracts, down the weirdest town. Information is done nothing is the bait recipe that were slow for world of reaching key box on the wolf river canyon colorado river and wolves. Fishing Reports and Discussions for Menasha Dam Winnebago County. How many hooks can being have capture one line? The river reports is burnt popcorn smell bad weather, female bass tournament. The river reports and sea? Video opens in fishing report at home to mariners and docks are reported during first, nickajack lake erie.
  • State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Permit to Discharge Under the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

    State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Permit to Discharge Under the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

    Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 1 of 30 STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE WISCONSIN POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of Chapter 283, Wisconsin Statutes, and chs. NR 151 and NR 216, Wisconsin Administrative Code, the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees : City of Brookfield City of Milwaukee Village of Butler Milwaukee County Village of Elm Grove City of West Allis Village of Germantown Village of West Milwaukee City of Greenfield City of Wauwatosa Village of Menomonee Falls are permitted to discharge storm water from ALL PORTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS Owned or operated by the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees to waters of the state in watersheds of the Menomonee River, Fox River, Kinnickinnic River, Root River, and Cedar Creek in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. This permit takes effect on the date of signature. This permit to discharge expires at midnight, December 1, 2017 To retain authorization to discharge after this expiration date, an application shall be filed for reissuance of this permit in accordance with the requirements of s. NR 216.09, Wis. Adm. Code, at least 180 days prior to this expiration date. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources For the Secretary By Bryan Hartsook Water Resources Engineer Date of Signature EFFECTIVE DATE/START DATE: November 30, 2012 EXPIRATION DATE: December 1, 2017 Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 2 of 30 Part I. APPLICABILITY The Menomonee River Watershed Permittees own and operate municipal separate storm sewer systems that discharge to waters of the state.
  • Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan

    Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan

    Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan City of Mequon, Wisconsin January 2014 Page intentionally left blank Mequon Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan 11333 N. Cedarburg Rd Mequon, WI 53092-1930 Phone: 262/236-2918 Fax: 262/242-9655 www.ci.mequon.wi.us Office of the Parks & Operations Director January 13, 2014 Dan Abendroth, Mayor Mequon Common Council 11333 North Cedarburg Road Mequon, WI 53092 Dear Mayor Abendroth & Common Council, The City of Mequon Park Board submits for your review the 2013 Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan. In 1991 the Park Board prepared the first Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan which was adopted by the Common Council and used as a guide for acquisition and development of needed park space in the City of Mequon. Every five years since the first Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan was submitted the Park Board has provided updated versions that were adopted by the Common Council. All of the recent plans have been a valuable resource for planning and guiding park acquisition and development. The adoption and implementation of the following document will qualify the City of Mequon for funding assistance from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. More importantly this plan will insure completion of an integrated park system that will provide a wide range of recreational opportunities for Mequon residents, while enhancing the overall quality of life in our Community. The Mequon Park Board is pleased to have been of assistance to the City of Mequon in preparation of the new Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
  • The Menomonee Valley: a Historical Overview

    The Menomonee Valley: a Historical Overview

    The Menomonee Valley: A Historical Overview by John Gurda The Menomonee Valley has been one of Milwaukee’s distinguishing features since long before the dawn of urban time. Four miles long and a half-mile wide, it was formed by meltwater during the retreat of the last continental glacier, which departed Wisconsin roughly 10,000 years ago. Although the Valley’s topography varied from year to year and even from season to season, it was generally a sprawling expanse of open water punctuated by beds of wild rice and dense mats of cattails, rushes, and reeds. Writing in 1875, pioneer historian James Buck described the Valley east of Fifth Street as “a wild rice swamp, covered with water from two to six feet in depth; in fact an impassable marsh.” The Valley was not impassable to native canoes. It was, in fact, a storehouse of resources that attracted human settlement centuries before anyone contemplated a city. The Menomonee River provided a canoe route from Lake Michigan to the interior, but far more important were the plants and animals it supported. Wild rice was a critically important food source for the procession of tribes who made their homes in the area. (The name “Menomonee” itself is derived from the word for wild rice.) Wetland plants provided the raw materials for baskets, mats, and shelters. Fish and waterfowl were abundant. James Buck penned a verdant description of the Valley in the 1830s: “All the marsh proper … would, in the Spring, be literally alive with fish that came in from the lake…. And the number of ducks that covered the marsh was beyond all computation.
  • The Menomonee Valley a Window to Milwaukee’S Past and a Projection of Its Future

    The Menomonee Valley a Window to Milwaukee’S Past and a Projection of Its Future

    The Menomonee Valley A Window to Milwaukee’s Past and a Projection of its Future Joseph Zagrodnik University of Wisconsin-Madison History 460, Section 307 24 November 2008 2 The one constant through the Menomonee Valley’s past has been its river. Of course, the river and everything around it has gone through astounding changes in the last few centuries, but the valley has always facilitated the flow of the Menomonee River on the final leg of its journey to Lake Michigan. Along this final path, specifically from Wisconsin Avenue to 27th street, the river passes some of the most striking symbols of Milwaukee’s past, present, and future which connect like nowhere else in the city. In this stretch, a baseball stadium and its vast parking lots pass by while a business park sits just behind the lots. Further down the river, two old smokestacks serve as the centerpiece to a new park, with steel trusses, manufacturing plants, and railroads in the background. At first, there may not seem to be much connection between these landmarks, but a closer look reveals that is the collision of these contrasting symbols in the geographical center of Milwaukee that makes the Menomonee Valley so remarkable. The economic initiatives represented by the smokestacks once contrasted with the ecological attributes still symbolized in the parks and river that first made the valley attractive to settlers. The impact of economic growth on the valley’s ecology is vital to understanding why the Menomonee Valley and the City of Milwaukee remain connected to this date. As the constant in the valley, the river is the best place to examine these changes.
  • Water Quality Monitoring on the Little Menomonee River System

    Water Quality Monitoring on the Little Menomonee River System

    Water Quality Monitoring in Ozaukee County Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources River Protection Planning Grant RP31018 Final Report Prepared By: Ozaukee County Planning and Parks Department 121 W. Main Street Port Washington, WI 53074 June 30, 2020 Draft Final Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Project Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 10 Monitoring Design ................................................................................................................................ 10 Monitoring Locations ............................................................................................................................ 11 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 16 General Water Quality Sampling Method Requirements & Quality Assurance/Quality Control .......... 16 Discrete Water Quality Sampling Methods ........................................................................................ 16 Continuous Water Quality Sampling Methods ................................................................................... 18 Additional Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 20 Section
  • Environmental Assessment Underwood Creek Great

    Environmental Assessment Underwood Creek Great

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDERWOOD CREEK GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN Underwood Creek approximately 0.25 miles upstream from the Menomonee River September 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers® Detroit District ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDERWOOD CREEK GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN Responsible Office: Detroit District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Analysis Branch 477 Michigan Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226-2550 ABSTRACT This document addresses the environmental impacts associated with an aquatic ecosystem restoration project on Underwood Creek in Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. The proposed project is being conducted under the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Program, which is authorized by Section 506 of the Water Resources and Development Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-541). The proposed action involves the removal of approximately 4400 linear feet of concrete lined channel along Underwood Creek, to support the restoration of the fishery, the aquatic ecosystem, and aquatic habitat. Improvements will result from the construction of a boulder and stone lined main channel with riffles and pools that will provide spawning habitat and fish passage to upstream areas that are currently blocked by the concrete channel lining and drop structures. The project will provide access for fish from Lake Michigan and the Menomonee River into the lower 1.25 miles of Underwood Creek. In the future, this connectivity is expected to extend into the upper reaches of Underwood Creek as the MMSD pursues removal of concrete drop structures that block fish passage into quality spawning habitats farther upstream. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant short term, long term or cumulative adverse environmental impacts.
  • Agenda Ozaukee County Board Regular Meeting Wednesday, October 7, 2020 – 9:00 Am Administration Center - Room A-204 121 W

    Agenda Ozaukee County Board Regular Meeting Wednesday, October 7, 2020 – 9:00 Am Administration Center - Room A-204 121 W

    AGENDA OZAUKEE COUNTY BOARD REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2020 – 9:00 AM ADMINISTRATION CENTER - ROOM A-204 121 W. MAIN STREET, PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074 THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS WILL BE BEFORE THE COUNTY BOARD FOR INITIATION, DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION, DELIBERATION AND POSSIBLE FORMAL ACTION: The public can access the meeting by viewing the live stream at the link which will be opened five minutes before the call to order: County Board Meeting Live Stream 1. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 2 and 16, 2020 4. PUBLIC COMMENT Legislative Update Chairperson's Proclamation 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. CLAIMS 7. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT County Administrator's Report - September 2020 2020 Fiscal Update 2021 Budget Update Strategic Planning Update Solar Now Project Update 8. NON-COMMENDATION RESOLUTIONS RES.20-36: Increase of Revenue 2020 - Public Health; Information Technology RES.20-37: Amending Section 2.03(8) and 2.05 (2) of the Ozaukee County Policy and Procedure Manual Regarding Change in Language for Session per Resolution No. 20-34 RES.20-38: Submittal and Acceptance of a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Land Acquisition Grant for Acquisition of the Clay Bluffs Cedar Gorge Nature Preserve as Part of the Ozaukee County Park System RES.20-39: Submittal and Acceptance of a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Management – Surface Water Restoration Wetland Incentive Grant to Support Stormwater Management, Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
  • Menominee River Fishing Report

    Menominee River Fishing Report Justis misassigns pushing. Smeared and caller Vachel edulcorated some succinates so irrepressibly! Sharp-set Nikos never hyalinizing so impenetrably or sectarianises any journeys vexedly. FISHING wcub. Typically the Fox River in start Bay is the first river for the spawn to occur assemble the trend works its not north side the Oconto Peshtigo and lastly the Menominee. The river reports, silver spoons had homes. EPA Reports Bibliography A Listing of EPA Reports Available. Lake Michigan Outdoor Fishing Report February 1 2021. Scope and river reported on the report for another popular pastime throughout door. Kentucky fishing reports lake information and fishing tips for Kentucky lakes. Lower Menominee River AOC Fisheries Data Roundup Final. Reporting seeing more and nitrogen species of fish said Milwaukee. 906 Fishing Report 906 Outdoors. Spawn chinook salmon, wisconsin and develop robust trout have been hunting and river but workers and! Fishing Cameras Wisconsin Fishing Reports. 5 Menominee River Wisconsin 1 Erik Lennartz with his largest ever river smallmouth bass a 6 pounder caught below the Menominee River. DNR Fishing Report 0322019 Local jail record-eagle. Karachay in menominee rivers, report has reported fair number of reports and maximum penalties and lake! Council OKs Tourist Booth Lease Firefighter Gets Building Report. Au sable river reported very strong north carolina resorts are. Bass Fishing Videos discoteche milano marittima cervia. Where get the fish biting in Wisconsin? By breed page available via the fuse holder, otter and river menominee fishing report for? Onondaga Lake D There are cost of rivers in the tow but direct of lightning these days.
  • The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001

    The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001 A report by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the Milwaukee River Basin Land and Water Partners Team and other stakeholders GOVERNOR Scott McCallum NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Trygve A. Solberg, Chair James E. Tiefenthaler, Jr., Vice-Chair Gerald M. O'Brien, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Howard D. Poulson Catherine L. Stepp Stephen D. Willett Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Franc Fennessy, Deputy Secretary Barbara Zellmer, Executive Assistant Gene Fransisco, Administrator Division of Forestry Steve Miller, Administrator Division of Land Susan L. Sylvester, Administrator Division of Water Gloria McCutcheon, Director Southeast Regional Office Frank Trcka, Land Leader Charles Krohn, Water Leader Southeast Regional Office The State of the Milwaukee River Basin August, 2001 PUBL WT 704 2001 A publication of the Department of Natural Resources Scott McCallum, Governor Southeast Region Headquarters Darrell Bazzell, Secretary 2300 N. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Gloria L. McCutcheon, Regional Director PO Box 12436 Milwaukee, WI, Wisconsin 53212 Telephone 414-263-8500 FAX 414-263-8716 TTY 414-263-8713 To: Recipients of The State of the Milwaukee River Basin Report We are pleased to present our first State of the Milwaukee River Basin report. This report provides an overview of land and water resource quality, identifies challenges facing these resources, and outlines actions the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and its many partners can take over the next few years to protect and restore our natural resources throughout the Milwaukee River Basin. This report is organized into land and water sections for simplicity, but shows how all our resources are closely linked.
  • Menomonee River Watersheds Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010

    Menomonee River Watersheds Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010

    Wisconsin Menomonee River Watersheds Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Milwaukee River Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010 Th e Menomonee River Watershed covers 136 square miles in portions of Washington, Ozaukee, Waukesha and Milwaukee counties. Th e river originates in the Village of German- town and the City of Mequon and fl ows in a southeasterly direction for about 32 miles before it meets the Milwaukee and Kinnick- Contents innic Rivers in the Milwaukee Milwaukee Harbor Estuary. Th e watershed contains 96 Watershed Details . 1 total stream miles and 4,537 wetland acres. Population and Land Use . 1 Hydrology . 2 Ecological Landscapes . 3 Historical Note . 3 Map 1: Menomonee Watershed Water Condition . 4 Watershed Details Point & Nonpoint Pollution Issues . 4 Population and Land Use River and Stream Quality . 4 The Menomonee River watershed Wetlands . 5 is very densely populated (2367 Lakes . 6 persons per square mile) when Aquatic Invasive Species . .6 compared to the State of Wisconsin Impaired Waters. .6 as a whole (99 persons per square Recent Planning Eff orts . .8 mile). Between 1990 and 2000, the Monitoring Studies . .9 population in the watershed has re- mained around 322,000 individuals, Water Actions . 4 but the number of household units Watershed Program Grants . .9 has increased by 3.5% to 129,736 Stream Specifi c Recommendations . .9 dwellings (SEWRPC 2007a). So, even Watershed Recommendations . .9 though the number of residents in the basin was stable, urban growth Figure 1: Land Use Menomonee Watershed was increasing. The watershed spans Appendices . 11 four counties, nine cities, six villages Watershed Map . 11 and four towns.