HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Aurora Prehn the History of Milwaukee
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Salmonid Stocking Summary
WISCONSIN’S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING PROGRAM Prepared: June 2017 By Thomas Burzynski Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 600 E. Greenfield Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 PUB-FH-828 2017 WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY Prepared by Thomas Burzynski Lake Michigan Fisheries Work Unit Milwaukee – UW WATER Institute Department of Natural Resources This stocking summary is based on stocking records entered by Wisconsin DNR staff into the statewide propagation database. A stocking record was generated each time hatchery fish were stocked into Lake Michigan. There are four types of information included in this summary report. First, total numbers of trout and salmon stocked from 1963-2016 are summarized. The numbers of trout and salmon that were requested for stocking during the current year (2017) are also included. The actual numbers of each species of fish stocked this year will depend on hatchery program production. The first summary (pages 2 and 3) is intended to provide an overview of long-term trends in the stocking of each species. The last three sets of summaries account for fish stocked during 2012-2016. The second set (pages 4 - 7) focuses on the numbers of fish stocked in each county along the Lake Michigan shoreline in 2012-2016. The third summary (pages 9 - 28) is a set of tables detailing specific stocking sites, the grid location of each stocking site, the specific number and age of fish planted at each site, and any identifying fin clips or marks. The fourth summary (pages 30 - 33) focuses on the marked trout and salmon stocked during the past five years (marked lake trout and steelhead are listed from 2005 and 2008 to the present respectively). -
East Side Commercial Historic District
HISTORIC DESIGNATION STUDY REPORT EAST SIDE COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I. NAME Common: East Side Commercial Historic District II. LOCATION The East Side Commercial Historic District is located in the Milwaukee central business district on the east side of the Milwaukee River. It is located within the area bounded approximately by North Water Street, East Wisconsin Avenue, North Milwaukee Street and East Clybourn Street. III. CLASSIFICATION District IV. OWNER Multiple V. YEAR BUILT 1854-1900 VI. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION A. Boundaries The East Side Commercial Historic District is bounded beginning at the intersection of East Wisconsin Avenue and North Milwaukee Street; then south along the west curb line of North Milwaukee Street to the north curb line of East Michigan Street; then west along said north curb line to the west curb line of North Broadway; then south along said west curb line to the north curb line of East Clybourn Street; then west along said north curb line to the east curb line of North Water Street; the north along said east curb line to the south curb line to the beginning point at the west curb line of North Milwaukee Street. B. Architectural Character The East Side Commercial Historic District includes three city blocks in Milwaukee’s central business district east of the Milwaukee River. The district is comprised almost exclusively of mixed business uses. There are retail shops, restaurants, a variety of commercial service firms and numerous professional offices. The district is compactly built with many buildings of party-wall construction. There are forty-four buildings in the district. -
Historic Third Ward
Approximate boundaries: N-E. Clybourn St; S-E. Erie St; E-Lake Michigan; W-Milwaukee River DOWNTOWNHistoric Third Ward NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION A high proportion of blocks in the Third Ward border a waterway. On the east is Lake Michigan. The Milwaukee River also runs through the Ward and connects to the Menomonee River at the western section of the neighborhood. The area has a lovely Riverwalk. Most of the buildings are massive brick structures. Many of these had been warehouses in other incarnations and now house condos and shops. The mainly neoclassical buildings have ornamentation from the Victorian Gothic through the Art Deco eras. While the streets of the Historic Third Ward have few trees, the blocks are seasonally adorned with filled planters and flower baskets. Artwork and cultural centers are always within glancing distance. See photos below. HISTORY The Historic Third Ward has experienced many rebirths. What is known today as an upscale, trendy neighborhood by most Milwaukeeans, was something much different in the past. Early populations The major Indian nations that were settled in and around the Third Ward area when the Europeans arrived were the Menomonie and the Ho-Chunk. Near the Ward, on Jones Island and in the Menomonee Valley, were the Potawatomi. The fur traders followed the Indian settlements, and most of these were French, French Canadian, and Metis populations. One individual involved in the fur trade was Solomon Juneau, who would become Milwaukee’s first mayor. His wife was part Menomonie. He was also a large investor in real estate and was responsible for surveying much of the land in the Ward. -
Mapping Lake Sturgeon Habitat in the Milwaukee River Using Side-Scan Sonar
Mapping Lake Sturgeon Habitat in the Milwaukee River Using Side-Scan Sonar Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2018 Office of Great Waters Grant & 2018 River Protection Planning Grant RP30818 Draft Final Reports 2018 Fund for Lake Michigan Grant # 20180479 Draft Final Report Prepared By: Andrew Struck, Matt Aho, Ryan Miller, Angela Richter, Natalie Cotter, Brittany Hahn, and Cassie Avery Ozaukee County Planning and Parks Department 121 W. Main Street Port Washington, WI 53074 June 30, 2021 Table of Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Review of Existing Efforts ........................................................................................................................ 4 Fish Passage Remediation Efforts............................................................................................................. 7 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Remote Analysis of the Milwaukee River .............................................................................................. 13 Habitat Evaluation ................................................................................................................................. -
Menomonee Valley 2.0 Market Study
MENOMONEE VALLEY 2.0 MARKET STUDY 4 November 2014 - FINAL REPORT – Disclaimer: The analysis in this report is based on data provided by others and is not intended to be comprehensive in nature. Major policy, planning, infrastructure and investment decisions should not be made based solely on the analysis documented in this market study. It is intended to provide a basis for future decision making via a thorough land use and economic development planning process. The Menomonee Valley 2.0 Market Study was completed in 2013 and 2014 for the City of Milwaukee, Department of City Development. Contributors to this analysis include: Nathan Guequierre, URS Corporation James Hannig, URS Corporation Alexa Mothen, URS Corporation Virginia Carlson, Ph.D, Public Policy Forum Joe Peterangelo, Public Policy Forum Karen Baker Mathu, Bay Ridge Consulting Matthew Schumwinger, Big Lake Data MENOMONEE VALLEY 2.0 MARKET STUDY: INTRODUCTION In support of the City of Milwaukee’s Menomonee Valley Comprehensive Area Plan Update 2014, called Valley 2.0, a team of planners and economists completed a study of the industrial, labor and real estate markets in southeast Wisconsin and the Menomonee River Valley planning area in the City of Milwaukee. This report documents findings and outlines policy and planning implications of those findings. The Market Study is divided into three parts: Findings from the stakeholder involvement process; Findings from an analysis of the state of the manufacturing market and labor market in southeastern Wisconsin; Findings from an analysis of land use in the Menomonee Valley. This market study is intended to inform the Valley 2.0 planning process and to provide a baseline understanding of economic conditions in the Menomonee Valley. -
Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary
Watershed Restoration Plan Menomonee River Chapter 1: Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) is to identify specific actions that can be implemented between 2010 and 2015 to improve water quality within the Menomonee River and its tributaries and present general recommendations for activity beyond 2015. These actions have been identified based upon a consideration of many factors, including overall effectiveness, scientific underpinning, regulatory considerations, and stakeholder goals. This WRP describes the characteristics of the Menomonee River and its watershed, focusing on those topics that are directly related to implementation (Figure 1-1). Information provided includes existing (Baseline Year 2000) and Year 2020 land uses, Baseline Year 2000 and Year 2020 water quality conditions, and the most significant sources of pollution. Water quality goals selected by the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (SWWT), based upon scientific, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations, are also presented and explained, as are the load reductions that will be needed to meet those goals. The reductions are based upon projected loads for the Year 2020 and as such account for future growth. This WRP is the culmination of historical and recent activity to protect and restore water quality within the greater Milwaukee region. Most significantly, it builds upon the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU) and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) 2020 Facilities Plan and incorporates the input from members of the SWWT and its associated Menomonee River Watershed Action Team (WAT) and Science Committee. 1.2 Key Elements of the Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan This WRP follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for developing effective watershed plans. -
Menominee River Fishing Report
Menominee River Fishing Report Which Grove schedules so arbitrarily that Jefferey free-lance her desecration? Ravil club his woggle evidence incongruously or chattily after Bengt modellings and gaugings glossarially, surrendered and staid. Hybridizable Sauncho sometimes ballast any creeks notarizing horridly. Other menominee river fishing report for everyone to increase your game fish. Wisconsin Outdoor news Fishing Hunting Report May 31 2019. State Department for Natural Resources said decree Lower Menominee River that. Use of interest and rivers along the general recommendations, trent meant going tubing fun and upcoming sturgeon. The most reports are gobbling and catfish below its way back in the charts? Saginaw river fishing for many great lakes and parking lot of the banks and october mature kokanee tackle warehouse banner here is. Clinton river fishing report for fish without a privately owned and hopefully bring up with minnows between grand river in vilas county railway north boundary between the! Forty Mine proposal on behalf of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin. Get fish were reported in menominee rivers, report tough task give you in the! United states fishing continues to the reporting is built our rustic river offers a government contracts, down the weirdest town. Information is done nothing is the bait recipe that were slow for world of reaching key box on the wolf river canyon colorado river and wolves. Fishing Reports and Discussions for Menasha Dam Winnebago County. How many hooks can being have capture one line? The river reports is burnt popcorn smell bad weather, female bass tournament. The river reports and sea? Video opens in fishing report at home to mariners and docks are reported during first, nickajack lake erie. -
Juneau Town/East Town
Approximate boundaries: N-E. Ogden Ave (partial) E. State St;S -E. Clybourn St; E-E-Lincoln Memorial Dr;W -Milwaukee River DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION East Town (also known as Juneau Town) is a densely populated neighborhood with a variety of housing styles. There are many 19th century houses in the Tudor, Queen Anne and Italianate styles integrated with multi-unit apartment buildings and newer condos. The neighborhood has some wide boulevards with green space in the medians. The streets generally follow a grid pattern; the exceptions to this are Water Street and Prospect Avenue. Water Street tracks the bend of the river and Prospect Avenue follows the curve of the bluff over Lake Michigan along Juneau Park. The topography is flat except for a hill that slopes down to the river beginning around Jefferson Street. Most of Juneau Park is in East Town. There are two monuments in Juneau Park--one is a statue of Solomon Juneau and the other of Leif Erikson. Cathedral Square is a small park in the center of the neighborhood and hosts numerous events throughout the year (see outings section and neighborhood photos below). HISTORY East Town owes its origins to Solomon Juneau. In the 1830s Juneau platted the village of Milwaukee and settled there. He began selling plots of land in what was becoming known as Juneau Town. He set the location for downtown when he and his wife Josette opened a trading post at today’s Water Street and Wisconsin Avenue. Juneau went on to become the first mayor of Milwaukee in 1846 and the city’s first postmaster. -
State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Permit to Discharge Under the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 1 of 30 STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE WISCONSIN POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of Chapter 283, Wisconsin Statutes, and chs. NR 151 and NR 216, Wisconsin Administrative Code, the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees : City of Brookfield City of Milwaukee Village of Butler Milwaukee County Village of Elm Grove City of West Allis Village of Germantown Village of West Milwaukee City of Greenfield City of Wauwatosa Village of Menomonee Falls are permitted to discharge storm water from ALL PORTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS Owned or operated by the Menomonee River Watershed Permittees to waters of the state in watersheds of the Menomonee River, Fox River, Kinnickinnic River, Root River, and Cedar Creek in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. This permit takes effect on the date of signature. This permit to discharge expires at midnight, December 1, 2017 To retain authorization to discharge after this expiration date, an application shall be filed for reissuance of this permit in accordance with the requirements of s. NR 216.09, Wis. Adm. Code, at least 180 days prior to this expiration date. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources For the Secretary By Bryan Hartsook Water Resources Engineer Date of Signature EFFECTIVE DATE/START DATE: November 30, 2012 EXPIRATION DATE: December 1, 2017 Menomonee River Watershed-Based MS4 Permit WPDES Permit No. WI-S050156-1 Page 2 of 30 Part I. APPLICABILITY The Menomonee River Watershed Permittees own and operate municipal separate storm sewer systems that discharge to waters of the state. -
Implementing Act 31 in Wisconsin
Faculty of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Implementing Act 31 in Wisconsin An Exploration of the History, the Act, and the Educators Who Make it Happen Kendyl Michaela Reis Master thesis in Indigenous Studies IND-3904 Fall 2019 Implementing Act 31 in Wisconsin An Exploration of the History, the Act, and the Educators Who Make it Happen Kendyl Michaela Reis Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education UiT The Arctic University of Norway Fall 2019 Supervised by Torjer Olsen Professor in Indigenous Studies Center for Sami Studies i ii Acknowledgements There are so many people who I want to take the time to thank and acknowledge in this section-- so buckle up, this is a three page acknowledgement. This section is probably the part that I have been the most excited to write and I waited until near the completion of my thesis to write this. I would not be where I am today if I had made different life choices. It would take a thesis itself to thank everyone who has been a part of my life, so I want to give a general acknowledgement and thanks to everyone who has played any role in my life- personally or academically. I also want to take a moment to acknowledge that this thesis has been worked on the traditional and contemporary homelands of Northern Sámi, Southern Sámi, Ojibwe, Dakota, and Ho-Chunk people. I want to thank Torjer Olsen for supervising me for the last year and a half, and for helping me with navigate through everything that comes with writing a thesis and answering my countless questions about methods, methodology, job prospects, and more related to this thesis. -
Menomonee Valley Stormwater Park
Menomonee Valley- Stormwater Park PUB-RR-827 January, 2009 Menomonee Valley - Stormwater management and green space were key elements of early plans for redevelopment. The area Stormwater Park is within the 100-year flood plain for the region, and the site’s proximity to the Menomonee River posed 3301 W. Canal Street a risk for contaminated run-off to flow into the Milwaukee, WI water and towards Lake Michigan. Early concepts Milwaukee County for the redevelopment focused heavily on balancing the needs of the industrial center with the space 2.8 Acres required for green areas. Location: Menomonee River Valley The largest brownfield redevelopment in Wisconsin’s history includes 70 acres for storm water management and green space, putting the “park” in business park. History The redevelopment of the former Milwaukee Road rail yard in the west end of the Menomonee Valley is a grand undertaking, many years in the making. Crews perform landscape work in the new Stormwater The Valley had been a hotbed of manufacturing Park (photo courtesy Menomonee Valley Partners). and industrial activity since before the turn of the 20th Century. As the importance of railroads Investigation & Cleanup declined, so did the jobs that the rail yard and Once cleanup began, crews discovered the one-time associated businesses provided. In 1985, the rail yard had a surprisingly manageable amount of Milwaukee Road went bankrupt and the former contamination— consisting mostly of petroleum, Road Shops site was left empty. Site pollution, lead and other hazardous materials. In extremely following years of industrial use, made the property polluted hotspots, soil was removed from the a long shot for redevelopment. -
Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan
Village of Grafton Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2020 - 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VILLAGE BOARD PLAN COMMISSION Jim Brunnquell, President Jim Brunnquell, Chair David Antoine, Trustee David Liss, Trustee Lisa Uribe Harbeck, Trustee Carl Harms, Member Thomas Krueger, Trustee Alan Kletti, Member David Liss, Trustee Mark Paschke, Member Susan Meinecke, Trustee Randy Silasiri, Member James Miller, Trustee PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD VILLAGE STAFF Meg Canepa, Chair Jesse Thyes, Village Administrator Lisa Uribe Harbeck, Trustee John Safstrom, Parks and Recreation Director Thomas Krueger, Trustee Jessica Wolff, Community Development Director James Miller, Trustee Charlie Donohue, Administrative Secretary II Steve Nauta, Member Mark Slaminski, Member Jodie Wolf, Senior Center Representative Park and Open Space Plan i ii Village of Grafton, WI TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 3 HISTORY OF GRAFTON ................................................................................................ 4 GENERAL REGIONAL CONTEXT .................................................................................. 5 POPULATION TRENDS AND FORECASTS ................................................................... 7 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS .............................................................................................