Menominee River Fishing Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lower Wisconsin State Riverway Visitor River in R W S We I N L O S Co
Lower Wisconsin State Riverway Visitor River in r W s we i n L o s co Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ● Lower Wisconsin State Riverway ● 1500 N. Johns St. ● Dodgeville, WI 53533 ● 608-935-3368 Welcome to the Riverway Please explore the Lower Wisconsin State bird and game refuge and a place to relax Riverway. Only here can you fi nd so much while canoeing. to do in such a beautiful setting so close Efforts began in earnest following to major population centers. You can World War Two when Game Managers fi sh or hunt, canoe or boat, hike or ride began to lease lands for public hunting horseback, or just enjoy the river scenery and fi shing. In 1960 money from the on a drive down country roads. The Riv- Federal Pittman-Robinson program—tax erway abounds in birds and wildlife and moneys from the sale of sporting fi rearms the history of Wisconsin is written in the and ammunition—assisted by providing bluffs and marshes of the area. There is 75% of the necessary funding. By 1980 something for every interest, so take your over 22,000 acres were owned and another pick. To really enjoy, try them all! 7,000 were held under protective easement. A decade of cooperative effort between Most of the work to manage the property Citizens, Environmental Groups, Politi- was also provided by hunters, trappers and cians, and the Department of Natural anglers using license revenues. Resources ended successfully with the passage of the law establishing the Lower About the River Wisconsin State Riverway and the Lower The upper Wisconsin River has been called Wisconsin State Riverway Board. -
Wisconsin's Lake Michigan Salmonid Stocking Summary
WISCONSIN’S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING PROGRAM Prepared: June 2017 By Thomas Burzynski Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 600 E. Greenfield Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 PUB-FH-828 2017 WISCONSIN'S LAKE MICHIGAN SALMONID STOCKING SUMMARY Prepared by Thomas Burzynski Lake Michigan Fisheries Work Unit Milwaukee – UW WATER Institute Department of Natural Resources This stocking summary is based on stocking records entered by Wisconsin DNR staff into the statewide propagation database. A stocking record was generated each time hatchery fish were stocked into Lake Michigan. There are four types of information included in this summary report. First, total numbers of trout and salmon stocked from 1963-2016 are summarized. The numbers of trout and salmon that were requested for stocking during the current year (2017) are also included. The actual numbers of each species of fish stocked this year will depend on hatchery program production. The first summary (pages 2 and 3) is intended to provide an overview of long-term trends in the stocking of each species. The last three sets of summaries account for fish stocked during 2012-2016. The second set (pages 4 - 7) focuses on the numbers of fish stocked in each county along the Lake Michigan shoreline in 2012-2016. The third summary (pages 9 - 28) is a set of tables detailing specific stocking sites, the grid location of each stocking site, the specific number and age of fish planted at each site, and any identifying fin clips or marks. The fourth summary (pages 30 - 33) focuses on the marked trout and salmon stocked during the past five years (marked lake trout and steelhead are listed from 2005 and 2008 to the present respectively). -
Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Underlying the US Portions of The
The eight continuous AUs (and associated basins) are as follows: Table 2. Summary of mean values of Great Lakes oil and National Assessment of Oil and Gas Fact Sheet 1. Pennsylvanian Saginaw Coal Bed Gas AU (Michigan Basin), gas resource allocations by lake. 2. [Devonian] Northwestern Ohio Shale AU (Appalachian Basin), [Compiled from table 1, which contains the full range of statistical 3. [Devonian] Marcellus Shale AU (Appalachian Basin), values] Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Underlying the 4. Devonian Antrim Continuous Gas AU (Michigan Basin), 5. Devonian Antrim Continuous Oil AU (Michigan Basin), Total undiscovered resources U.S. Portions of the Great Lakes, 2005 6. [Silurian] Clinton-Medina Transitional AU (Appalachian Basin), Oil Gas Natural gas 7. [Ordovician] Utica Shale Gas AU (Appalachian Basin), and (million (trillion liquids 8. Ordovician Collingwood Shale Gas AU (Michigan Basin). barrels), cubic feet), (million barrels), Of these eight continuous AUs, only the following four AUs were Lake mean mean mean Lake bathymetry (meters) 300 - 400 assessed quantitatively: [Silurian] Clinton-Medina Transitional AU, Devo- he U.S. Geological Survey recently completed Lake Erie 46.10 3.013 40.68 T 200 - 300 nian Antrim Continuous Gas AU, [Devonian] Marcellus Shale AU, and Lake Superior allocations of oil and gas resources underlying the U.S. por- 100 - 200 Allocation [Devonian] Northwestern Ohio Shale AU. The other four continuous AUs Lake Huron 141.02 0.797 42.49 area tions of the Great Lakes. These allocations were developed 0 - 100 lacked sufficient data to assess quantitatively. Lake Michigan 124.59 1.308 37.40 from the oil and gas assessments of the U.S. -
Glimpses of Early Dickinson County
GLIMPSES OF EARLY DICKINSON COUNTY by William J. Cummings March, 2004 Evolution of Michigan from Northwest Territory to Statehood From 1787 to 1800 the lands now comprising Michigan were a part of the Northwest Territory. From 1800 to 1803 half of what is now the Lower Peninsula of Michigan and all of the Upper Peninsula were part of Indiana Territory. From 1803 to 1805 what is now Michigan was again part of the Northwest Territory which was smaller due to Ohio achieving statehood on March 1, 1803. From 1805 to 1836 Michigan Territory consisted of the Lower Peninsula and a small portion of the eastern Upper Peninsula. In 1836 the lands comprising the remainder of the Upper Peninsula were given to Michigan in exchange for the Toledo Strip. Michigan Territory Map, 1822 This map of Michigan Territory appeared in A Complete Historical, Chronological and Geographical American Atlas published by H.S. Carey and I. Lea in Philadelphia in 1822. Note the lack of detail in the northern Lower Peninsula and the Upper Peninsula which were largely unexplored and inhabited by Native Americans at this time. Wiskonsan and Iowa, 1838 Michigan and Wiskonsan, 1840 EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! VULCAN – A number of Indians – men, women and children – came into town Wednesday last from Bad Water [sic] for the purpose of selling berries, furs, etc., having with them a lot of regular Indian ponies. They make a novel picture as they go along one after the other, looking more like Indians we read about than those usually seen in civilization, and are always looked upon in wonderment by strangers, though it has long since lost its novelty to the residents here. -
Lower Wisconsin River Main Stem
LOWER WISCONSIN RIVER MAIN STEM The Wisconsin River begins at Lac Vieux Desert, a lake in Vilas County that lies on the border of Wisconsin and the Lower Wisconsin River Upper Pennisula in Michigan. The river is approximately At A Glance 430 miles long and collects water from 12,280 square miles. As a result of glaciation across the state, the river Drainage Area: 4,940 sq. miles traverses a variety of different geologic and topographic Total Stream Miles: 165 miles settings. The section of the river known as the Lower Wisconsin River crosses over several of these different Major Public Land: geologic settings. From the Castle Rock Flowage, the river ♦ Units of the Lower Wisconsin flows through the flat Central Sand Plain that is thought to State Riverway be a legacy of Glacial Lake Wisconsin. Downstream from ♦ Tower Hill, Rocky Arbor, and Wisconsin Dells, the river flows through glacial drift until Wyalusing State Parks it enters the Driftless Area and eventually flows into the ♦ Wildlife areas and other Mississippi River (Map 1, Chapter Three ). recreation areas adjacent to river Overall, the Lower Wisconsin River portion of the Concerns and Issues: Wisconsin River extends approximately 165 miles from the ♦ Nonpoint source pollution Castle Rock Flowage dam downstream to its confluence ♦ Impoundments with the Mississippi River near Prairie du Chien. There are ♦ Atrazine two major hydropower dams operate on the Lower ♦ Fish consumption advisories Wisconsin, one at Wisconsin Dells and one at Prairie Du for PCB’s and mercury Sac. The Wisconsin Dells dam creates Kilbourn Flowage. ♦ Badger Army Ammunition The dam at Prairie Du Sac creates Lake Wisconsin. -
Daa/,Ii.,Tionalized City and the Outlet Later Prussia Gained Possession of It
mmszm r 3?jyzpir7?oa^r (; Endorsed bu the Mississippi Valley Association as a Part of One of Danzig’s Finest Streets. “One of the Biooest Economic union oy tup peace inranon or inuepenacnee, Danzig was treaty becomes an interna- separated from Poland and ‘21 years Moves Ever Launched on the Daa/,ii.,tionalized city and the outlet later Prussia gained possession of it. for Poland to the Baltic, is Again made a free city by Napoleon, American Continent” * * thus described In a bulletin issued by it passed once more to Poland; then the National Geographic society: back to Prussia in 1814. Picture n far north Venice, cut Danzig became the capital of West HE Mississippi Valley associa- through with streams and canals, Prussia. Government and private tion indorses the plan to estab- equipped also with a sort of irrigation docks were located there. Shipbuild- lish the Mlssi- sippi Valley Na- system to tlood the country for miles ing and the making of munitions were tional park along the Mississip- about, not for cultivation but for de- introduced and amber, beer and liquors a of were other Its pi river near McGregor, la., and fense; city typical Philadelphia products. granarict, and Prairie du Chien, Wls." streets, only with those long rows of built on an island, were erected when made of and it was the This action was taken at the stoops stone highly deco- principal grain shipping rated and into the for Poland and Silesia. first annual meeting of the Mis- jutting roadway in- port stead of on the and is a little farther rail sissippi Valley association in sidewalks, you Danzig by catch but a of the northeast of Berlin than Boston Is Chicago. -
The Annals of Iowa
The Annals of Volume 73, Number 4 Iowa Fall 2014 A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF HISTORY In This Issue ERIC STEVEN ZIMMER, a doctoral candidate in American history at the University of Iowa, describes the Meskwaki fight for self-governance, in the face of the federal government’s efforts to force assimilation on them, from the time they established the Meskwaki Settlement in the 1850s until they adopted a constitution under the Roosevelt administration’s Indian New Deal in the 1930s. GREGORY L. SCHNEIDER, professor of history at Emporia State University in Kansas, relates the efforts made by the State of Iowa to maintain service on former Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad lines in the 1970s as that once mighty railroad company faced the liquidation of its holdings in the wake of bankruptcy proceedings. Front Cover As the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad faced bankruptcy in the 1970s, it abandoned branch lines and depots across the state of Iowa. This 1983 photo of the abandoned depot and platforms in West Liberty repre- sents just one of many such examples. To read about how the State of Iowa stepped in to try to maintain as much rail service as possible as the Rock Island was liquidated, see Gregory Schneider’s article in this issue. Photo taken by and courtesy of James Beranek. Editorial Consultants Rebecca Conard, Middle Tennessee State R. David Edmunds, University of Texas University at Dallas Kathleen Neils Conzen, University of H. Roger Grant, Clemson University Chicago William C. Pratt, University of Nebraska William Cronon, University of Wisconsin– at Omaha Madison Glenda Riley, Ball State University Robert R. -
Ruffe (Gymnocephalus Cernua) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) Ecological Risk Screening Summary US Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, July 2014 Revised, June 2015 Photo: USFWS 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Fuller et al. (2014): “Northern Europe and Asia (Berg 1949; Holcik and Hensel 1974; Wheeler 1978; Page and Burr 1991).” Status in the United States From Fuller et al. (2014): “The ruffe was first identified by Wisconsin DNR in specimens collected from the St. Louis River at the border of Minnesota and Wisconsin in 1987 (Pratt 1988; Pratt et al. 1992; Czypinski et al. 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003). Following that report, reexamination of archived samples revealed misidentified larval specimens of ruffe had been collected from the same area in 1986 (Pratt 1988). The ruffe subsequently spread into Duluth Harbor in Lake Superior and several tributaries of the lake (Underhill 1989; Czypinski et al. 1999, 2000, 2004; Scheidegger, pers. comm.; J. Slade, pers. comm.). It is found in the Amnicon, Flag, Iron, Middle, Raspberry, and Bad rivers, Chequamegon Bay, and Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in Wisconsin (Czypinski et al. 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004; Tilmant 1999). In August 1994, it was found in Saxon Harbor, Wisconsin, and in the upper peninsula of Michigan at the mouths of the Black and Ontonagon rivers (K. Kindt, pers. comm.). In the lower Peninsula of Michigan along Lake Huron, the first three specimens were caught at the mouth of the Thunder Bay River in August 1995 (K. Kindt, pers. comm.). This species has also been collected in Michigan in Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, Torch Lake, Little Bay de Noc in Escanaba, Big Bay de Noc, Misery River, Ontonagon River, Thunder Bay, and Sturgeon River Sloughs (Czypinski et al. -
Lake Erie Coastal Ohio Trail Scenic Byway
Welcome to the Lake Erie Scenic Byway! I o are lannin a ti or aot to drive the Coastal rail o are in or a tl nie eerience that ill shocase this reion in a ne liht olloin the Lae rie Coast the drive alone is a eat eerience ae tie to eno or coast and savor the sihts and area s o lan or or ti tae this ide alon and reeer that the a is aot tie landscaes that have een chanin since the laciers han evidence throhot the aes and cltral eeriences that ierse o in the reion and it’s ast ach ton alon Facts and Figures about the Trail the a has character nto itsel so rela and tae he cenic a is a ile rote that ill e a tie to ore alon or teasred coast roiatel one da drive to eerience the ore ravel throh seven conties alon the sother he Lae rie Coastal rail sans a rote o iles shore o the Lae rie Coast hich ollos the coast o Lae rie tavelin o ver Inventor ites hihlihtin the varios oledo east to the Pennslvania order he tail is slit activities and eeriences alon the shore into three sections the norhest he tail’s Intinsic alities ocs on the istoric incldin Lcas aa rie and atral alities o the area and Lorain conties and the Lae Places to visit alon the tail inclde istoric ites rie Islands he norhcental atral and Protected reas eaches and Pars encoasses Cahoa and Lorain rs and Cltral ites ses ecreational Conties and the norheast reion ishin arinas istoric aritie ites ineries encoassin shtala and seent Pars dcational Centers eliios Lae Conties lon the rote ites and rorets o ill notice that or histor cltre and natral areas lend Lake Erie Coastal Ohio Trail -
Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary
Watershed Restoration Plan Menomonee River Chapter 1: Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) is to identify specific actions that can be implemented between 2010 and 2015 to improve water quality within the Menomonee River and its tributaries and present general recommendations for activity beyond 2015. These actions have been identified based upon a consideration of many factors, including overall effectiveness, scientific underpinning, regulatory considerations, and stakeholder goals. This WRP describes the characteristics of the Menomonee River and its watershed, focusing on those topics that are directly related to implementation (Figure 1-1). Information provided includes existing (Baseline Year 2000) and Year 2020 land uses, Baseline Year 2000 and Year 2020 water quality conditions, and the most significant sources of pollution. Water quality goals selected by the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (SWWT), based upon scientific, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations, are also presented and explained, as are the load reductions that will be needed to meet those goals. The reductions are based upon projected loads for the Year 2020 and as such account for future growth. This WRP is the culmination of historical and recent activity to protect and restore water quality within the greater Milwaukee region. Most significantly, it builds upon the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU) and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) 2020 Facilities Plan and incorporates the input from members of the SWWT and its associated Menomonee River Watershed Action Team (WAT) and Science Committee. 1.2 Key Elements of the Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan This WRP follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for developing effective watershed plans. -
What Are the Current Pressures Impacting Lake Erie
STATE OF THE GREAT LAKES 2005 WHAWHATT AREARE THETHE CURRENTCURRENT PRESSURESPRESSURES IMPIMPACTINGACTING LAKELAKE ERIE?ERIE? Land use practices, nutrient inputs, and the introduction of non-native invasive species are the greatest threats Land use, nutrient inputs, natural resource use, chemical and biological contaminants, and non- to the Lake Erie ecosystem. Natural resource use and chemical and biological contaminants also continue to native invasive species are the greatest threats to the Lake Erie ecosystem. impact the Lake Erie basin. Pressures and Actions Needed Land use Lake Superior Land use changes, including urban development and sprawl, intensification of agriculture, and Lake Huron construction of shore structures continue to negatively impact water quality and quantity, and Lake Ontario fish and wildlife habitats in Lake Erie and its Lake Michigan tributaries. Unless significant changes are made, this trend is expected to continue as demand for land Lake Erie conversion and use in the Lake Erie basin intensifies. In some areas of the Lake Erie watershed, over 90 actually render the ecosystem more susceptible to percent of the land has been converted to future invasions. Increased water transparency due to agriculture, urban and industrial use. A major focus the combined effects of nutrient control and zebra on the rehabilitation of remaining natural habitats mussel filtering has reduced habitat for walleye, and the physical processes that support them is which avoid high light conditions. Increased water required in order to restore Lake Erie's aquatic transparency combined with lower Lake Erie water ecosystems. Through best management practices, we levels has resulted in an increase of submerged must undertake rural, urban and industrial land use aquatic plants. -
Bookletchart™ Little Bay De Noc NOAA Chart 14915
BookletChart™ Little Bay de Noc NOAA Chart 14915 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the Escanaba, Mich., is on the W side of Little Bay de Noc, 6 miles NE of Ford River and 7 miles NW of Peninsula Point. A lighted red brick National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration cylindrical building in the city is prominent. Sand Point, marked by a National Ocean Service private light, extends E from shore at the city and protects the harbor Office of Coast Survey area on its N side. The harbor has depths of 28 to 40 feet within 0.4 mile of shore and affords access for the largest vessels on the lakes. Escanaba www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov River flows into the harbor 2.5 miles NW of Sand Point. 888-990-NOAA Escanaba Light (45°44.8'N., 87°02.2'W.), 45 feet above the water, is shown from a white square tower with a green stripe on a crib on the NE What are Nautical Charts? side of the shoal on the N side of Sand Point; a fog signal is at the light. A buoy 0.35 mile W of the light marks the N side of an obstruction. Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show A small-craft basin, developed by the city and the Michigan State water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much Waterways Commission, is on the S side of Sand Point.