DOCSLIB.ORG

Bending and Shear in Beams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bending and Shear in Beams Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5th October 2016 Contents – Lecture 3 • Bending/ Flexure – Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced – Tension reinforcement, A s – neutral axis depth limit & K’ – Compression reinforcement, A s2 • Flexure Worked Example – Doubly reinforced • Shear in Beams - Variable strut method • Beam Examples – Bending, Shear & High shear • Exercise - Design a beam for flexure and shear EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/1 Bending/ Flexure Section Design: Bending • In principal flexural design is generally the same as BS8110 • EC2 presents the principles only • Design manuals will provide the standard solutions for basic design cases. • There are modifications for high strength concrete ( fck > 50 MPa ) Note: TCC How to guide equations and equations used on this course are based on a concrete fck ≤ 50 MPa EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/2 Section Analysis to determine Tension & Compression Reinforcement EC2 contains information on: • Concrete stress blocks • Reinforcement stress/strain curves • The maximum depth of the neutral axis, x. This depends on the moment redistribution ratio used, δ. • The design stress for concrete, fcd and reinforcement, fyd In EC2 there are no equations to determine As, tension steel, and A s2 , compression steel, for a given ultimate moment, M, on a section. Equations, similar to those in BS 8110, are derived in the following slides. As in BS8110 the terms K and K’ are used: M K = Value of K for maximum value of M 2 with no compression steel and bd f ck when x is at its maximum value. If K > K’ Compression steel required Rectangular Concrete Stress Block EC2: Cl 3.1.7, Fig 3.5 εcu3 η fcd Concise: Fig 6.1 Fc Ac x λx d Remember this from last week? As Fs εs fck λ η fck ≤≤≤ 50 MPa 50 < fck ≤≤≤ 90 MPa 50 0.8 1 55 0.79 0.98 λλλ 0.8 = 0.8 –(fck – 50)/400 60 0.78 0.95 70 0.75 0.9 ηηη 1.0 = 1,0 –(fck – 50)/200 80 0.73 0.85 90 0.7 0.8 fcd = αcc fck /γc = 0.85 fck /1.5 For fck ≤ 50 MPa failure concrete strain, εcu , = 0.0035 EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/3 Reinforcement Design Stress/Strain Curve EC2: Cl 3.2.7, Fig 3.8 σ Idealised kf yk kf yk /γs fyk In UK fyk = 500 MPa fyd = fyk /γs fyd = fyk /γs = 500/ 1.15 = 435 MPa Design Es may be taken to be 200 GPa Steel yield strain = f /E yd s ε ε ε fyd / Es ud uk (εεεs at yield point) = 435/200000 = 0.0022 At failure concrete strain is 0.0035 for fck ≤ 50 MPa. If x/d is 0.6 steel strain is 0.0023 and this is past the yield point. Design steel stress is 435 MPa if neutral axis, x, is less than 0.6d. Analysis of a singly reinforced beam EC2: Cl 3.1.7 Design equations can be derived as follows: b M For grades of concrete up to C50/60, εcu = 0.0035, ηηη = 1 and λλλ = 0.8. fcd = 0.85 fck /1.5 fyd = fyk /1.15 = 0.87 fyk Fc = (0.85 fck / 1.5) b (0.8 x) = 0.453 fck b x For no compression Fst = 0.87 As fyk reinforcement Fsc = 0 Methods to find As: • Iterative, trial and error method – simple but not practical • Direct method of calculating z, the lever arm, and then A s EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/4 Analysis of a singly reinforced beam Determine A s – Iterative method b M For horizontal equilibrium Fc= Fst 0.453 fck b x = 0.87 As fyk Guess As Solve for x z = d - 0.4 x M = F c z Stop when design applied BM, M Ed ≃ M Analysis of a singly reinforced beam Determine A s – Direct method Take moments about the centre of the tension force, Fst : M = Fc z = 0.453 fck b x z (1) Now z = d - 0.4 x M ∴ x = 2.5( d - z) ∴ M = 0.453 fck b 2.5( d - z) z 2 = 1.1333 ( fck b z d - fck b z ) 2 Let K = M / ( fck b d ) 2 M fck bdz fck bz K = 2 = 1.1333 2 - 2 fck bd fck bd fck bd (K may be considered as the normalised bending resistance) ∴ 0 = 1.1333 [( z/d )2 –(z/d )] + K 0 = ( z/d )2 –(z/d ) + 0.88235 K EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/5 0 = ( z/d )2 –(z/d ) + 0.88235 K Solving the quadratic equation: M z/d = [1 + (1 - 3.53 K)0.5 ]/2 z = d [ 1 + (1 - 3.53 K)0.5 ]/2 The lever arm for an applied moment is now known Quadratic formula Higher Concrete Strengths fck ≤ 50MPa z = d[1 + (1 − 3.529K )]/2 Normal strength fck = 60MPa z = d[1 + (1 − 3.715K )]/2 fck = 70MPa z = d[1 + (1 − 3.922K )]/2 fck = 80MPa z = d[1 + (1 − 4.152K )]/2 fck = 90MPa z = d[1 + (1 − 4.412K )]/2 EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/6 Tension steel, A s Concise: 6.2.1 Take moments about the centre of the compression force, F c: M = Fst z = 0.87 As fyk z Rearranging As = M /(0.87 fyk z) The required area of reinforcement can now be found using three methods: a) calculated using these expressions b) obtained from Tables of z/d (eg Table 5 of How to beams or Concise Table 15.5, see next slide ) c) obtained from graphs (eg from the ‘ Green Book’ or Fig B.3 in Concrete Buildings Scheme Design Manual, next slide but one ) Design aids for flexure - method (b) 2 K = M / ( fck b d ) Concise: Table 15.5 . Traditionally z/d was limited to 0.95 max to avoid issues with the quality of ‘covercrete’. ‘Normal’ tables and charts are only valid up to C50/60 EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/7 Design aids for flexure- method (c) TCC Concrete Buildings Scheme Design Manual, Fig B.3 ) 2 b d b ck f =/ M( K Design chart for singly reinforced beam Maximum neutral axis depth EC2: Cl 5.5 Linear elastic analysis with limited redistribution Concise: Table 6.1 According to Cl 5.5(4) the depth of the neutral axis is limited, viz: δ ≥ k1 + k2 xu/d where k1 = 0.4 k2 = 0.6 + 0.0014 / εcu2 = 0.6 + 0.0014/0.0035 = 1 xu = depth to NA after redistribution Redistribu ted Bending Moment δ = Elastic Bending Moment = Redistribution ratio ∴ xu ≤ d ( δ - 0.4) Therefore there are limits on K and this limit is denoted K’ For K > K’ Compression steel needed EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/8 K’ and Beams with Compression Reinforcement, A s2 Concise: 6.2.1 The limiting value for K (denoted K’) can be calculated as follows: As before M = 0.453 fck b x z … (1) 2 and K = M / ( fck b d ) & z = d – 0.4 x & xu = d ( δ – 0.4) Substituting xu for x in eqn (1) and rearranging: 2 2 M’ = b d fck (0.6 δ – 0.18 δ - 0.21) 2 2 ∴ K’ = M’ /( b d fck ) = (0.6 δδδ – 0.18 δδδ - 0.21) Min δ = 0.7 (30% redistribution). Steel to be either Class B or C for 20% to 30% redistribution. Some engineers advocate taking x/d < 0.45, and ∴K’ < 0.168. It is often considered good practice to limit the depth of the neutral axis to avoid ‘over-reinforcement’ to ensure a ductile failure. This is not an EC2 requirement and is not accepted by all engineers. Note: For plastic analysis xu/d must be ≤ 0.25 for normal strength concrete, EC2 cl 5.6.2 (2). Compression steel, A s2 EC2: Fig 3.5 Concise: 6.2.1 For K > K’ compression reinforcement A s2 is required. As2 can be calculated by taking moments about the centre of the tension force: 2 M = K’ fck b d + 0.87 fyk As2 (d - d2) Rearranging 2 As2 = ( K - K’) fck b d / (0.87 fyk (d - d2)) EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/9 Tension steel, A s for beams with Compression Reinforcement, The concrete in compression is at its design capacity and is reinforced with compression reinforcement. So now there is an extra force: Fsc = 0.87 As2 fyk The area of tension reinforcement can now be considered in two parts. The first part balances the compressive force in the concrete (with the neutral axis at x u). The second part balances the force in the compression steel. The area of reinforcement required is therefore: 2 As = K’ fck b d /(0.87 fyk z) + As2 where z is calculated using K’ instead of K Design Flowchart The following flowchart outlines the design procedure for rectangular beams with concrete classes up to C50/60 and grade 500 reinforcement Carry out analysis to determine design moments ( M) Determine K and K’ from: δδδ K’ M 2 K === & K' === 6.0 δδδ −−− 18.0 δδδ −−− .0 21 1.00 0.208 bd 2 f ck 0.95 0.195 Note: δδδ =1.0 means no redistribution and δδδ = 0.8 means 20% moment redistribution. 0.90 0.182 0.85 0.168 Yes No 0.80 0.153 Is K ≤ K’ ? 0.75 0.137 0.70 0.120 No compression steel Compression steel needed - needed – singly reinforced doubly reinforced It is often recommended in the UK that K’ is limited to 0.168 to ensure ductile failure EC2 Webinar – Autumn 2016 Lecture 3/10 Flow Chart for Singly-reinforced Beam/Slab K ≤ K’ Calculate lever arm z from: d z === [[[1+++ 1−−− 53.3 K ]]] ≤≤≤ 95.0 d * 2 (Or look up z/d from table or from chart.) * A limit of 0.95 d is considered good practice, it is not a requirement of Eurocode 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remarks on the Current Theory of Shear Strength of Variable Depth Beams A
    28 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 3, 28-33 Open Access Remarks on the Current Theory of Shear Strength of Variable Depth Beams A. Paglietti* and G. Carta Department of Structural Engineering, University of Cagliari, Italy Abstract: Though still in use today, the method of the effective shearing force to evaluate the maximum shear stress in variable depth beams does not stand close scrutiny. It can lead to overestimating the shearing strength of these beams, al- though it is suggested as a viable procedure by many otherwise excellent codes of practice worldwide. This paper should help to put the record straight. It should warn the practitioner against the general inadequacy of such a method and prompt the drafters of structural concrete codes of practice into acting to eliminate this erroneous though persisting designing pro- cedure. Key Words: Variable depth beams, Effective shearing force, Tapered beams, Building codes. INTRODUCTION to a sloped side of the beam. Accordingly, the component of such a force which is normal to the beam axis is supposed to The three simply supported beams shown in Fig. (1) all increase or decrease the internal shear needed to equilibrate have the same span and carry the same load. Their shape is the shearing force acting at the considered cross section. This different, though. Beam (a) is a constant depth beam, while is what is stated, almost literally, in Sect. R 11.1.1.2 of the beams (b) and (c) are just two different instances of a vari- American Concrete Institute Code [1] and represents the able depth beam.
    [Show full text]
  • Enghandbook.Pdf
    785.392.3017 FAX 785.392.2845 Box 232, Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expy Minneapolis, KS 67467 ENGINEERING HANDBOOK TECHNICAL INFORMATION STEELMAKING Basic descriptions of making carbon, alloy, stainless, and tool steel p. 4. METALS & ALLOYS Carbon grades, types, and numbering systems; glossary p. 13. Identification factors and composition standards p. 27. CHEMICAL CONTENT This document and the information contained herein is not Quenching, hardening, and other thermal modifications p. 30. HEAT TREATMENT a design standard, design guide or otherwise, but is here TESTING THE HARDNESS OF METALS Types and comparisons; glossary p. 34. solely for the convenience of our customers. For more Comparisons of ductility, stresses; glossary p.41. design assistance MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METAL contact our plant or consult the Machinery G.L. Huyett’s distinct capabilities; glossary p. 53. Handbook, published MANUFACTURING PROCESSES by Industrial Press Inc., New York. COATING, PLATING & THE COLORING OF METALS Finishes p. 81. CONVERSION CHARTS Imperial and metric p. 84. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Steelmaking 4 Metals and Alloys 13 Designations for Chemical Content 27 Designations for Heat Treatment 30 Testing the Hardness of Metals 34 Mechanical Properties of Metal 41 Manufacturing Processes 53 Manufacturing Glossary 57 Conversion Coating, Plating, and the Coloring of Metals 81 Conversion Charts 84 Links and Related Sites 89 Index 90 Box 232 • Exit 49 G.L. Huyett Expressway • Minneapolis, Kansas 67467 785-392-3017 • Fax 785-392-2845 • [email protected] • www.huyett.com INTRODUCTION & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was created based on research and experience of Huyett staff. Invaluable technical information, including statistical data contained in the tables, is from the 26th Edition Machinery Handbook, copyrighted and published in 2000 by Industrial Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bending and Shear Analysis and Design of Ductile Steel Plate Walls
    13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 77 BENDING AND SHEAR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF DUCTILE STEEL PLATE WALLS Mehdi H. K. KHARRAZI1, Carlos E. VENTURA2, Helmut G. L. PRION3 and Saeid SABOURI-GHOMI 4 SUMMARY For the past few decades global attention and interest has grown in the application of Ductile Steel Plate Walls (DSPW) for building lateral load resisting systems. Advantages of using DSPWs in a building as lateral force resisting system compromise stable hysteretic characteristics, high plastic energy absorption capacity and enhanced stiffness, strength and ductility. A significant number of experimental and analytical studies have been carried out to establish analysis and design methods for such lateral resisting systems, however, there is still a need for a general analysis and design methodology that not only accounts for the interaction of the plates and the framing system but also can be used to define the yield and ultimate resistance capacity of the DSPW in bending and shear combination. In this paper an analytical model of the DSPW that characterizes the structural capacity in the shear and bending interaction is presented and discussed. This proposed model provides a good understanding of how the different components of the system interact, and is able to properly represent the system's overall hysteretic characteristics. The paper also contributes to better understand the structural capacity of the DPSW and of the shear and bending interaction. The simplicity of the method permits it to be readily incorporated in practical non-linear dynamic analyses of buildings with DSPWs.
    [Show full text]
  • USE of HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL REINFORCEMENT in SHEAR FRICTION APPLICATIONS by Gabriel Augusto Zeno B.S. in Civil Engineering, Univ
    USE OF HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL REINFORCEMENT IN SHEAR FRICTION APPLICATIONS by Gabriel Augusto Zeno B.S. in Civil Engineering, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Swanson School of Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Pittsburgh 2009 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SWANSON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING This thesis was presented by Gabriel Augusto Zeno It was defended on October 21, 2009 and approved by Dr. John Brigham, Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Julie Vandenbossche, Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Advisor: Dr. Kent A. Harries, Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering ii Copyright © by Gabriel Augusto Zeno 2009 iii USE OF HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL REINFORCEMENT IN SHEAR FRICTION APPLICATIONS Gabriel Augusto Zeno, M.S. University of Pittsburgh, 2009 This thesis reports the results of a study associated with Task 8.4b of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 12-77 Structural Concrete Design with High-Strength Steel Reinforcement. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of the use of high-strength steel reinforcement in shear friction applications. Shear friction is the mechanism present when shear is transferred across an interface between two concrete members that can slip relative to one another. It arises from the roughness of the interface and the clamping force created by the steel reinforcement across it. The study was accomplished by testing typical push-off specimens with a cold joint test interface, which had a surface roughness with at least ¼-inch amplitude in order to simulate the connection between a composite slab and an AASHTO girder.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Design for Shear
    Chapter 2 Design for Shear By Richard W. Furlong 2.1 Introduction Shear is the term assigned to forces that act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of structural elements. Shear forces on beams are largest at the supports, and the shear force at any distance x from a support decreases by the amount of load between the support and the distance x. Under uniform loading, the slope of the shear diagram equals the magnitude of the unit uniform load. Shear forces exist only with bending forces. Concrete beams are expected to crack in flexure, with such cracks forming perpendicular to longitudinal tension reinforcement, i.e., perpendicular also to a free edge. Principal tension stresses change direction from horizontal at the longitudinal reinforcement to 45o at the neutral axis and vertical at the location of maximum compression stress. Consequently, cracks in concrete tend to “point” toward the region of maximum compression stress as indicated by the cracks shown in Fig. 4.1. Axial compression force plus bending makes the area of compressed concrete larger than without axial force. ACI 318-05 permits the evaluation of shear capacity for most beams to be taken as the combination of strength from concrete without shear reinforcement Vc plus the strength Vs provided by shear reinforcement. Shear strength of a slab that resists flexural forces in two orthogonal directions around a column (flat plates, footings and pile caps), is evaluated as the shear strength of a prism located at a distance of half the slab depth d from the faces of the column. Neutral axis Neutral axis Span region Support region Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolted Joint Design
    Bolted Joint Design There is no one fastener material that is right for every environment. Selecting the right fastener material from the vast array of those available can be a daunting task. Careful consideration must be given to strength, temperature, corrosion, vibration, fatigue, and many other variables. However, with some basic knowledge and understanding, a well thought out evaluation can be made. Mechanical Properties of Steel Fasteners in Service Most fastener applications are designed to support or transmit some form of externally applied load. If the strength of the fastener is the only concern, there is usually no need to look beyond carbon steel. Considering the cost of raw materials, non-ferrous metals should be considered only when a special application is required. Tensile strength is the mechanical property most widely associated with standard threaded fasteners. Tensile strength is the maximum tension-applied load the fastener can support prior to fracture. The tensile load a fastener can withstand is determined by the formula P = St x As . • P= Tensile load– a direct measurement of clamp load (lbs., N) • St= Tensile strength– a generic measurement of the material’s strength (psi, MPa). • As= Tensile stress area for fastener or area of material (in 2, mm 2) To find the tensile strength of a particular P = St x As bolt, you will need to refer to Mechanical P = tensile load St = tensile strength As = tensile stress area Properties of Externally Threaded Fasteners (lbs., N) (psi, MPa) (sq. in, sq. mm) chart in the Fastenal Technical Reference Applied to a 3/4-10 x 7” SAE J429 Grade 5 HCS Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms In
    Glossary of Terms in Powder and Bulk Technology Prepared by Lyn Bates ISBN 978-0-946637-12-6 The British Materials Handling Board Foreward. Bulk solids play a vital role in human society, permeating almost all industrial activities and dominating many. Bulk technology embraces many disciplines, yet does not fall within the domain of a specific professional activity such as mechanical or chemical engineering. It has emerged comparatively recently as a coherent subject with tools for quantifying flow related properties and the behaviour of solids in handling and process plant. The lack of recognition of the subject as an established format with monumental industrial implications has impeded education in the subject. Minuscule coverage is offered within most university syllabuses. This situation is reinforced by the acceptance of empirical maturity in some industries and the paucity of quality textbooks available to address its enormous scope and range of application. Industrial performance therefore suffers. The British Materials Handling Board perceived the need for a Glossary of Terms in Particle Technology as an introductory tool for non-specialists, newcomers and students in this subject. Co-incidentally, a draft of a Glossary of Terms in Particulate Solids was in compilation. This concept originated as a project of the Working Part for the Mechanics of Particulate Solids, in support of a web site initiative of the European Federation of Chemical Engineers. The Working Party decided to confine the glossary on the EFCE web site to terms relating to bulk storage, flow of loose solids and relevant powder testing. Lyn Bates*, the UK industrial representative to the WPMPS leading this Glossary task force, decided to extend this work to cover broader aspects of particle and bulk technology and the BMHB arranged to publish this document as a contribution to the dissemination of information in this important field of industrial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Tensile‒Shear Fracture Behavior Prediction of High- Strength Steel
    Article Tensile–Shear Fracture Behavior Prediction of High- Strength Steel Laser Overlap Welds Minjung Kang 1,2, In-Hwan Jeon 1, Heung Nam Han 2 and Cheolhee Kim 1,* 1 Welding and Joining Research Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 7-47, Songdodong, Yeonsugu, Incheon 21999, Korea; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (I.-H.J.) 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering and RIAM, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-32-850-0222; Fax: +82-32-850-0210 Received: 30 April 2018; Accepted: 16 May 2018; Published: 18 May 2018 Abstract: A wider interface bead width is required for laser overlap welding by increasing the strength of the base material (BM) because the strength difference between the weld metal (WM) and the BM decreases. An insufficient interface bead width leads to interface fracturing rather than to the fracture of the BM and heat-affected zone (HAZ) during a tensile–shear test. An analytic model was developed to predict the tensile–shear fracture location without destructive testing. The model estimated the hardness of the WM and HAZ by using information such as the chemical composition and tensile strength of the BM provided by the steel makers. The strength of the weldments was calculated from the estimated hardness. The developed model considered overlap weldments with similar and dissimilar material combinations of various steel grades from 590 to 1500 MPa. The critical interface bead width for avoiding interface fracturing was suggested with an accuracy higher than 90%.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Shear Strength of Composite Concrete Beams with a Rough Interface
    Horizontal Shear Strength of Composite Concrete Beams With a Rough Interface The latest version of the ACI Building Code requires five equations to prescribe the limiting horizontal shear stress for differing amounts of reinforcing steel. The test results from the 16 beams tested in this study indicate that a more consistent limit can be obtained by replacing four of the present equa­ tions with a parabolic equation modified from the one used in the PC/ Design Handbook. The proposed equation combines the effect of concrete strength and clamping stress. It is equally applicable for lightweight and semi-lightweight con­ crete. The test results indicate that an as-cast surface with the Robert E. Loov coarse aggregate left protruding from the surface, but without D. Phil., P. Eng. Professor of Civil Engineering special efforts to produce a rough surface, can develop ade­ The University of Calgary quate shear resistance and simplify production of the precast Calgary, Alberta concrete beams. Also, the tests show that stirrups are typi­ Canada cally unstressed and ineffective until horizontal shear stresses exceed 1.5 to 2 MPa (220 to 290 psi). omposite construction is an and the girder at their interface. The economical way of combining roughness of the top of the precast C precast and cast-in-place con­ concrete beam, the amount of steel crete while retaining the continuity crossing the joint and the concrete and efficiency of monolithic construc­ strength are the major factors affecting tion. A composite beam is small er, the shear strength of the interface. shallower and lighter, thus leading to Provisions for the design of the steel overall cost savings.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Symbols
    List of symbols a throat thickness of fillet weld a1 effective length of the foundation, length of the base plate ac height of the column cross-section ah size of the anchor head b width of angle leg, width of the base plate b0, b1, bw width, effective width of the foundation bb width of beam flange bc width of the column cross-section, of column flange beff effective width bhaz width of heat affected zone bp width of end plate c effective width of the flexible base plate c∅ required concrete cover for reinforcement d nominal diameter of the bolt d0 diameter of the bolt hole d0, d1, d2 diameter dh diameter of anchor head e eccentricity, distance from bolt to edge of T-stub, from edge of the angle e, ex, ea, eb bolt distances e0 eccentricity of the joint e1, e2 bolt end distance, in force direction, perpendicular to force direction ex distance from bolt to edge of end plate fa characteristic strength for local capacity in tension and compression fa,haz characteristic strength of heat affected zone fcd design value of compressive cylinder strength of concrete fcd = fck / γc fcd,g design value of compressive cylinder strength of grout fck characteristic value of concrete compressive cylinder strength fj concrete bearing strength fo characteristic strength for bending and yielding in tension and compression fu ultimate strength fub ultimate strength of the bolt fv characteristic shear strength fv,haz characteristic shear strength of heat affected zone fvw,d design shear resistance of the fillet weld per unit length fw characteristic strength
    [Show full text]
  • Interlaminar Shear Strength and Failure Analysis of Aluminium-Carbon Laminates with a Glass Fiber Interlayer After Moisture Absorption
    materials Article Interlaminar Shear Strength and Failure Analysis of Aluminium-Carbon Laminates with a Glass Fiber Interlayer after Moisture Absorption Jarosław Bienia´s*, Patryk Jakubczak , Magda Dro´zdzieland Barbara Surowska Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (P.J.); [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (B.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 6 July 2020 Abstract: This article presents selected aspects of an interlaminar shear strength and failure analysis of hybrid fiber metal laminates (FMLs) consisting of alternating layers of a 2024-T3 aluminium alloy and carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Particular attention is paid to the properties of the hybrid FMLs with an additional interlayer of glass composite at the metal-composite interface. The influence of hygrothermal conditioning, the interlaminar shear strength (short beam shear test), and the failure mode were investigated and discussed. It was found that fiber metal laminates can be classified as a material with significantly less adsorption than in the case of conventional composites. Introducing an additional layer of glass composite at the metal-composite interface and hygrothermal conditioning influence the decrease in the interlaminar shear strength. The major forms of damage to the laminates are delaminations in the layer of the carbon composite, at the metal-composite interface, and delaminations between the layers of glass and carbon composites. Keywords: fiber metal laminates; moisture absorption; interlaminar shear strength; failure modes 1. Introduction Among the fiber metal laminates (FMLs), the most noteworthy are the laminates where the layers are made of carbon reinforced aluminium laminates (CARALL).
    [Show full text]
  • Shear Strength Prediction Equations and Experimental Study of High Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different
    applied sciences Article Shear Strength Prediction Equations and Experimental Study of High Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different Shear Span-to-Depth Ratios Wisena Perceka 1, Wen-Cheng Liao 2,* and Yung-Fu Wu 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University, No. 94, Ciumbuleuit Road, Bandung 40141, Indonesia; [email protected] 2 Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 October 2019; Accepted: 5 November 2019; Published: 9 November 2019 Abstract: Conducting research on steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) beams without stirrups, particularly the SFRC beams with high-strength concrete (HSC) and high-strength steel (HSS) reinforcing bars is essential due to the limitation of test results of high strength SFRC beams with high strength steel reinforcing bars. Eight shear strength prediction equations for analysis and design of the SFRC beam derived by different researchers are summarized. A database was constructed from 236 beams. Accordingly, the previous shear strength equations can be evaluated. Ten high-strength SFRC beams subjected to monotonic loading were prepared to verify the existing shear strength prediction equations. The equations for predicting shear strength of the SFRC beam are proposed on the basis of observations from the test results and evaluation results of the previous shear strength equations. The proposed shear strength equation possesses a reasonable result. For alternative analysis and design of the SFRC beams, ACI 318-19 shear strength equation is modified to consider steel fiber parameters.
    [Show full text]