DOCSLIB.ORG

Dis-Orienting Polyamory: Preserving Poly’S Transformative Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIS-ORIENTING POLYAMORY: PRESERVING POLY’S TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL LIANE CELINE MARIE CHESHIRE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN WOMEN’S STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO June 2020 © Liane Celine Marie Cheshire, 2020 ii Abstract Drawing on the narratives of 21 people practicing polyamory in the city of Guelph, ON, this study explores how participants define and conceptualize polyamory, in general, and in relation to their self-concept. Drawing on grounded theory, autoethnography and narrative analysis, this study presents a range of definitions and subjective meanings of polyamory. This dissertation argues that people understand polyamory in a range of ways and that there is no single unified definition of polyamory nor a standard way of conceptualizing polyamory in relation to self-concept. The narratives demonstrate that the fluidity and diversity of definitions and conceptions of polyamory afford participants the opportunity to adapt polyamory to their individual situations. While some participants define polyamory in ways that reproduce sexual normalcy by claiming essentialist identities and privileging love, other participants define polyamory in ways that enable them to resist heteronormative and homonormative monogamy and transform their relationship dynamics. Some participants understand polyamory as interconnected with their queer, feminist, and anarchist politics. Participants who identify as asexual, or who have mental health challenges, conceptualize polyamory in ways that allow them to transform their relationships in non-normative ways. The narratives reveal that none of the participants constructs polyamory as a sexual orientation or as one distinct thing. Resisting the move to define polyamory as a sexual orientation, what I call dis-orienting polyamory, preserves the radical politics and transformative potentials that polyamory offers polyamorists. iii Dedication For my children, Seth and Luke, who encouraged me every step of the way. You make life more beautiful than I could have ever imagined. For my parents, who always give me a voice. iv Acknowledgments The road to completing this dissertation has been long. I would not have finished without the support of the many people in my life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my supervisor, Dr. Bobby Noble, whose knowledge, encouragement, guidance and patience saw me through to completion. I would like to thank Dr. Jen Gilbert for introducing me to Foucault many years ago and for providing valuable feedback on this project. I would like to thank Dr. Shannon Bell for the time she took reviewing and commenting on my work. I would also like to thank Dr. Marc Stein, whose supervision brought me through the proposal stage of this dissertation and for including me in his student-reading group. I would also like to thank members of my defence committee, Dr. Sheila Cavanagh and Dr. Nathan Rambukkana, whose academic work have inspired me. I would like to acknowledge the Graduate Program Directors in the Gender, Feminist & Women’s Studies program who have guided me over the years. Dr. Allyson Mitchell, Dr. Ena Dua, Dr. Meg Luxton, and Dr. David Murray, thank you for your support and guidance. I also want to acknowledge the invaluable support I have received over the years from Yemi Adebisi and Hazel Beechum, in their roles as Graduate Program Assistants in our department. I would like to thank my colleagues from Georgian College, who have supported me over the years. Dr. Scott Staring, Dr. Jill Rettinger, Dr. Peter Babiak, Dr. Boris Kowalsky, Dr. Trudy Bergere, Dr. Ed Robinson, Dr. Geoffrey Booth, Dr. Anita Arvast, Alanda Theriault, Melanie Marchand, and David Hurst, have all provided me much encouragement along the way. I would especially like to acknowledge my colleague and friend, Dr. Nancy Noldy-MacLean, whose unwavering friendship and support have kept me going. I would also like to acknowledge Georgian College for providing me a professional development leave from teaching so I could write this dissertation. Although there are too many people in my family to name them all individually, I want to thank them all for always believing in me. Thanks to the Brûlé clan, my parents Jim and Lorraine Cheshire, my brother Jason Cheshire, and my children Seth and Luke Cheshire- MacMeneney, for cheering me along. I would like to acknowledge my partner, Carole Hotson, whose enduring support, patients, and selflessness have helped to get me to the finish line. I also want to acknowledge the many friends who have listened to my thoughts, offered their insights, and occasionally pulled me away from my desk for a break. Thanks to all of the TWISTED women in my life and a special thanks to Dr. Lynn Woodford, Nabil Yatim, Petr Hejny, Dr. Robert Nadon, and Jennifer Button. Thanks Jen for the many hours spent discussing this project. Lindsay Core, thank you for walking me to my first graduate class and hanging in all the way through. In particular, I want to thank and acknowledge the participants who shared their stories with me. This dissertation would not be possible without you. v Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... ii Dedication ................................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................v List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... vii Chapter One: Introduction .......................................................................................................1 Polyamory’s Multiple Meanings .............................................................................................1 Formal Definitions of Polyamory Matter .............................................................................. 12 Normalizing, Naturalizing, and Privileging of Polyamory ..................................................... 21 The Guelph Polyamory Study ............................................................................................... 27 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 27 Cultural Context of the Study: Political Debates on Sex-Ed in Ontario .......................... 38 Chapter Summaries ....................................................................................................... 42 Chapter Two: The Participants .............................................................................................. 45 Participants: A Rich Description of Each Narrator ................................................................ 45 Josephine ....................................................................................................................... 45 Danni............................................................................................................................. 46 Brittany ......................................................................................................................... 47 Mark .............................................................................................................................. 47 Alex .............................................................................................................................. 48 Sage .............................................................................................................................. 48 Emma ............................................................................................................................ 49 Jamie ............................................................................................................................. 50 Lani ............................................................................................................................... 50 John ............................................................................................................................... 51 Sabrina .......................................................................................................................... 51 Corey............................................................................................................................. 52 Jordan ............................................................................................................................ 53 Matt ............................................................................................................................... 53 Hannah .......................................................................................................................... 54 Kamila ........................................................................................................................... 55 Jeff ................................................................................................................................ 55 Eileen ...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: an Argument from Bisexuality

    Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: an Argument from Bisexuality

    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality Michael Boucai University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Michael Boucai, Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality, 49 San Diego L. Rev. 415 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/66 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality MICHAEL BOUCAI* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................416 II. SEXUAL LIBERTY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE .............................. 421 A. A Right To Choose Homosexual Relations and Relationships.........................................421 B. Marriage'sBurden on the Right............................426 1. Disciplineor Punishment?.... 429 2. The Burden's Substance and Magnitude. ................... 432 III. BISEXUALITY AND MARRIAGE.. .........................................
  • Politics at the Intersection of Sexuality: Examining Political Attitudes and Behaviors of Sexual Minorities in the United States

    Politics at the Intersection of Sexuality: Examining Political Attitudes and Behaviors of Sexual Minorities in the United States

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2017 Politics at the Intersection of Sexuality: Examining Political Attitudes and Behaviors of Sexual Minorities in the United States Royal Gene Cravens III University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Cravens, Royal Gene III, "Politics at the Intersection of Sexuality: Examining Political Attitudes and Behaviors of Sexual Minorities in the United States. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4453 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Royal Gene Cravens III entitled "Politics at the Intersection of Sexuality: Examining Political Attitudes and Behaviors of Sexual Minorities in the United States." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Political Science. Anthony J. Nownes, Major Professor
  • Terminology Packet

    Terminology Packet

    This symbol recognizes that the term is a caution term. This term may be a derogatory term or should be used with caution. Terminology Packet This is a packet full of LGBTQIA+ terminology. This packet was composed from multiple sources and can be found at the end of the packet. *Please note: This is not an exhaustive list of terms. This is a living terminology packet, as it will continue to grow as language expands. This symbol recognizes that the term is a caution term. This term may be a derogatory term or should be used with caution. A/Ace: The abbreviation for asexual. Aesthetic Attraction: Attraction to someone’s appearance without it being romantic or sexual. AFAB/AMAB: Abbreviation for “Assigned Female at Birth/Assigned Male at Birth” Affectionional Orientation: Refers to variations in object of emotional and sexual attraction. The term is preferred by some over "sexual orientation" because it indicates that the feelings and commitments involved are not solely (or even primarily, for some people) sexual. The term stresses the affective emotional component of attractions and relationships, including heterosexual as well as LGBT orientation. Can also be referred to as romantic orientation. AG/Aggressive: See “Stud” Agender: Some agender people would define their identity as not being a man or a woman and other agender people may define their identity as having no gender. Ally: A person who supports and honors sexual diversity, acts accordingly to challenge homophobic, transphobic, heteronormative, and heterosexist remarks and behaviors, and is willing to explore and understand these forms of bias within themself.
  • 15-Bisexuality.Pdf

    15-Bisexuality.Pdf

    51 Bisexuality** What is Bisexuality? Bisexuality is the potential to feel sexually attracted to and to engage in sensual or sexual relationships with people of either sex. A bisexual person may not be equally attracted to both sexes, and the degree of attraction may vary over time. Self-perception is the key to bisexual identity. Many people engage in sexual activity with people of both sexes, yet do not identify as bisexual. Likewise, other people engage in sexual relations only with people of one sex, or do not engage in sexual activity at all, yet consider themselves bisexual. There is no behavioral "test" to determine whether or not one is bisexual. Bisexual Identity Some people believe that a person is born heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual (for instance due to prenatal hormonal influences), and that their identity is inherent and unchangeable. Others believe that sexual orientation is due to socialization (for example either imitating or rejecting parental models) or conscious choice (for example, choosing lesbianism as part of a political feminist identity). Others believe that these factors interact. Because biological, social, and cultural factors are different for each person, everyone's sexuality is highly individual, whether they are bisexual, gay or lesbian, heterosexual, or asexual. The "value" placed on a sexual identity should not depend on its origin. Many people assume that bisexuality is just a phase people go through. In fact, any sexual orientation can be a phase. Humans are diverse, and individual sexual feelings and behavior can change over time. The creation and consolidation of a sexual identity is an ongoing process.
  • 1 Introducing LGBTQ Psychology

    1 Introducing LGBTQ Psychology

    1 Introducing LGBTQ psychology Overview * What is LGBTQ psychology and why study it? * The scientific study of sexuality and ‘gender ambiguity’ * The historical emergence of ‘gay affirmative’ psychology * Struggling for professional recognition and challenging heteronormativity in psychology What is LGBTQ psychology and why study it? For many people it is not immediately obvious what lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) psychology is (see the glossary for defini- tions of words in bold type). Is it a grouping for LGBTQ people working in psychology? Is it a branch of psychology about LGBTQ people? Although LGBTQ psychology is often assumed to be a support group for LGBTQ people working in psychology, it is in fact the latter: a branch of psychology concerned with the lives and experiences of LGBTQ people. Sometimes it is suggested that this area of psychology would be more accurately named the ‘psychology of sexuality’. Although LGBTQ psychology is concerned with sexuality, it has a much broader focus, examining many different aspects of the lives of LGBTQ people including prejudice and discrimination, parenting and families, and com- ing out and identity development. One question we’re often asked is ‘why do we need a separate branch of psychology for LGBTQ people?’ There are two main reasons for this: first, as we discuss in more detail below, until relatively recently most psychologists (and professionals in related disciplines such as psychiatry) supported the view that homosexuality was a mental illness. ‘Gay affirmative’ psychology, as this area was first known in the 1970s, developed to challenge this perspective and show that homosexuals are psychologically healthy, ‘normal’ individuals.
  • Ways to Be an Ally to Nonmonosexual / Bi People

    Ways to Be an Ally to Nonmonosexual / Bi People

    Ways To Be An Ally to Nonmonosexual / Bi People The ideas in this pamphlet were generated during a discussion at a UC Davis Bi Visibility Project group meeting and were compiled Winter quarter, 2009. Nonmonosexual / bisexual individuals self-identify in a variety of different ways – please keep in mind that though this pamphlet gives suggestions about how to be a good ally, one of the most important aspects of being an ally is respecting individual’s decisions about self-identification. There are hundreds of ways to be a good ally – Please use these suggestions as a starting point, and seek additional resources! In this pamphlet the terms “bisexual” and “nonmonosexual” will be used Monosexism: a belief that monosexuality interchangeably to describe individuals who (either exclusive heterosexuality and/or identify with nonmonosexual orientations being lesbian or gay) is superior to a (attracted to more than one gender), bisexual or pansexual orientation. encompassing pan-, omni-, ambi-, bi-, and <http://www.wikipedia.com> nonmonosexual identities. Respect personal choices about self-identification and use specific terms on an individual basis. Try… Acknowledging that a person who is bisexual is always bisexual regardless of their current or past partner(s) or sexual experience(s). Using the terms, “monosexual” and “monosexism.” Educating yourself through articles, books, websites or other resources if you have questions. Questioning the negativity associated with bisexual stereotypes. Example: The stereotype that “all bi people are oversexed.” This reinforces societal assumptions about the nature of “good” or “appropriate” sexual practice or identity. Acknowledge the different ways women, people of color, disabled people, queer people and all intersections thereof, are eroticized or criticized for being sexual.
  • Agender Ally Androgynous Androgyne Androsexual/Androphilic Asexual

    Agender Ally Androgynous Androgyne Androsexual/Androphilic Asexual

    Terminology Agender Someone who does not identify with any sort of gender identity. This term may also be used by someone who intentionally has no recognizable gender presentation. Some people use similar terms such as “genderless” and “gender neutral”. Ally A Safe Zone ally honors sexual diversity, challenges heterosexist and cissexist remarks and behaviors, and explores and understands these forms of bias within their experiences. This person also works to end oppression personally and professionally through support and advocacy of an oppressed population. In this context Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Ally and Asexual individuals Androgynous This word describes both a gender identity as well as a manner of gender presentation. Those who identify as androgynous may identify as between man and woman or something else entirely. Those who present androgynous may dress in a manner that incorporates clothing that is traditionally for men and clothing that’s traditionally for women Androgyne An androgyne is a person who does not fit cleanly into the typical masculine and feminine gender roles of their society. Many androgynes identify as being mentally "between" male and female, or as entirely genderless. The former may also use the term bigender or ambigender, the latter non-gendered or agender. They may experience mental swings between genders, sometimes referred to as being gender fluid Androsexual/Androphilic Attracted to males, men, and/or masculinity Asexual A person who does not experience sexual attraction or has lost interest in sex but may still have romantic interests Bigender A person who fluctuates between traditionally “woman” and “man” gender-based behavior and identities, identifying with both genders (and sometimes a third gender) Binary Gender a traditional and outdated view of gender, limiting possibilities to “man” and “woman” Binary Sex a traditional and outdated view of sex, limiting possibilities to “female” or “male” Biological Sex The classification of people as male, female, or intersex.
  • Asexuality: Dysfunction Or Sexual Orientation?

    Asexuality: Dysfunction Or Sexual Orientation?

    em & yst Se S xu e a v l i t D c i Reproductive System & Sexual s u o Parente and Albuquerque, Reprod Syst Sex Disord 2016, 5:3 d r o d r e p r e DOI:10.4172/2161-038X.1000185 s R Disorders: Current Research ISSN: 2161-038X Commentary Open Access Asexuality: Dysfunction or Sexual Orientation? Jeanderson Soares Parente1 and Grayce Alencar Albuquerque2* 1Faculdade de Juazeiro do Norte-FJN, Member of the Research Group on Sexuality, Gender, Sexual Diversity and Inclusion-GPESGDI 2Nursing Department, Universidade Regional do Cariri- URCA *Corresponding author: Albuquerque GA, Assistant Professor of the Nursing Department of the Universidade Regional do Cariri- URCA, Coordinator of the Observatory of Violence and Human Rights, Leader of the Research Group on Sexuality, Gender, Sexual Diversity and Inclusion-GPESGDI, Street Vicente Furtado, 521, Limoeiro, Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brasil, Tel: +55-88-988878717; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: July 2, 2016; Acc date: July 20, 2016; Pub date: July 27, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Parente JS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The objective was to perform a brief reflection on asexuality and its relationship with medical (pathologizing) and social (sexual diversity) practices. Asexuality is still considered a sexual dysfunction capable of medicalization in medical practice, although currently, with the visibility of sexual diversity, asexual identity has been breaking the paradigm of medicalization of sexuality.
  • Sexual Identity As a Universal Process 27

    Sexual Identity As a Universal Process 27

    Sexual Identity as a Universal Process 27 Frank R. Dillon, Roger L. Worthington, and Bonnie Moradi Abstract This chapter summarizes advances in current theoretical and empirical literature on sexual identity development. It proposes a model of sexual identity that offers a more global (i.e., non-sexual identity group specific) perspective in comparison to existing sexual identity group-specific sexual identity models. Attention to commonalities in sexual identity development across sexual identity subgroups can offer a more global perspective that cap- tures shared experiences of sexual identity development as well as differences between subgroups. The proposed unifying model of sexual identity develop- ment incorporates what has been learned from years of theory and research concerning sexuality, LGB and heterosexual identity development, attitudes toward sexual minority individuals, and the meaning of ordinate and subor- dinate group membership. The model describes the intersection of various contextual factors that influence the individual and social processes under- lying sexual identity development. The unifying model is innovative in its applicability across sexual orientation identities, as well as its inclusion of a wide range of dimensions of sexual identity and possible developmental trajectories. The chapter concludes with a discussion of preliminary research findings that inform the unifying model and that have implications for future research. We hope this model allows researchers, educators, and practition- ers to develop interventions and conduct investigations on broader questions about human sexuality without being constrained to gay–straight dichotomies of sexual orientation and the related methodological limitations that have characterized sexual identity theory and research in the past. Identity consists of a stable sense of one’s goals, beliefs, values, and life roles (Erikson, 1950; F.R.
  • Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure: Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics

    Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure: Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure: Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hv987pn Author Rodriguez, JM Publication Date 2021-06-27 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California JUANA MARÍA RODRÍGUEZ Queer Politics, Bisexual Erasure Sexuality at the Nexus of Race, Gender, and Statistics COMING OF AGE as a bisexual Latina femme in the 1980s, I was sur- rounded by lesbian-feminist communities and discourses that dispar- aged, dismissed, and vilified bisexuality. Those of us that enthusiastically embraced femininity or that actively sought out masculine presenting butches, were deemed perpetually suspect. Femmes were imagined as being always on the verge of abandoning the lesbian-feminist commu- nities that nurtured us for the respectability and privilege that hetero- sexual relations might afford. The label bisexuality, for those that dared to claim it, was viewed as the apolitical cop-out for those that were not radical enough to fully commit to the implied lesbian practice of feminist theory. In the bad old days of lesbian separatist politics, bisexu- ality was attached to a yearning, not just for men, but for multifarious sexual pleasures deemed decidedly anti-feminist including desires for penetration, sexual dominance and submission, and the wickedly per- verse delights of expressive gender roles. Decades later, discursive prac- tices have shifted. The B is now routinely added to the label LGBT and the umbrella of queer provides discursive cover for sexual practices that fall outside the normative frameworks of heteropatriarchy.
  • Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Rights

    Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Rights

    Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Rights The following is material to consider for your syllabus. Specifically, there is: 1 Scholarly writing on sexual orientation and gender identity rights written by diverse scholars and experts 2 Scholarly writing providing geographic variety and geographically varied perspectives 3 Studies and analyses examining diversity, equity and inclusion-related dimensions of sexual orientation and gender identity rights This is a living document; resources will be added and altered over time to ensure timeliness and quality. We would welcome your contributions and feedback. DISCUSSIONS OF THEORY Morris, Bonnie J. “History of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Social Movements.” American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association, 2016. Key words: LGBT movement, Pulse shooting, persecution, activism, religion, internet, media Mendos, Lucas Ramón. “State-Sponsored Homophobia.” International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, 2019. Key words: LGBTQ+, United Nations, UNESCO, OAS, EU, Africa, Latin America, Asia, criminalization, protection, recognition Brettschneider, Marla, Susan Burgess, and Christine Keating. LGBTQ Politics: A Critical Reader. New York, NY: New York University Press, 2017. Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security giwps.georgetown.edu Syllabus Resources Key words: LGBTQ rights, grassroots movement, critical theory, inclusion, politics, activism, law, coalition-building McKay, Tasseli, Shilpi Misra, and Christine Lindquist. “Violence and LGBTQ+ Communities: What Do We Know, and What Do We Need to Know?” RTI International, March 2017. Key words: LGBTQ+ persons, physical and sexual violence, harassment, victimization, legislation Bosia, Michael J., Sandra McEvoy, and Momin Rahman. The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Key words: LGBT politics, sexual diversity, gender diversity, inclusion, professional responsibility, Stonewall, queer theory Xavier B.
  • Discourses Governing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual Teachers’ Disclosure of Sexual Orientation and Gender History

    Discourses Governing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual Teachers’ Disclosure of Sexual Orientation and Gender History

    IssuesLaura Bower-Phippsin Teacher Education, Fall 2017 23 Discourses Governing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual Teachers’ Disclosure of Sexual Orientation and Gender History Laura Bower-Phipps Southern Connecticut State University Significant progress has been made in equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA) individu- als, yet schools remain institutions where sexual and gender diversity are marginalized and/or silenced (Ferjfola & Hopkins, 2013). Hetero- normativity enables a social and institutional context where LGBTQIA teachers must make decisions about coming out or disclosing who they are or how they identify, while cis-gendered, heterosexual teachers are exempt from such decisions (Gray, 2013). For LGBTQIA teachers, deci- sions about if and when to disclose sexual orientation and gender history require a great deal of emotional energy that could be spent teaching (Orlov & Allen, 2014). Developing an understanding of LGBTQIA teach- ers’ decisions around disclosure is essential for teacher educators who prepare sexual and gender minority teacher candidates and for school administrators to develop school climates that are inclusive of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. Decisions around such disclosures are complex and implicated with numerous trade-offs (Gray, 2013). Many LGBTQIA teachers do not dis- close sexual orientation and/or gender history for fear of employment termination or limiting their opportunities for promotions (DePalma & Laura Bower-Phipps is an associate professor in the Department of Curriculum and Learning of the School of Education at Southern Con- necticut State University, New Haven, Connecticut. Her e-mail address is [email protected] Volume 26, Number 3, Fall 2017 24 Discourses Governing LGBTQIA Teachers’ Disclosure Atkinson, 2010; Rudoe, 2010).