DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity of Marine Fauna on Central West Coast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity of Marine Fauna on Central West Coast Strategic Research Fund for the Marine Environment Collaborative Research Project: Biodiversity of Marine Fauna on the Central West Coast SRFME Final Milestone Report – December 2006 Principal Investigator: Dr J. Fromont Scientific team: C. Hass, L. Marsh, G. Moore, M. Salotti, M. Titelius & C. Whisson. WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Locked Bag 49 Welshpool DC, WA 6986 [email protected] Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 General Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Habitat Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.4 Invertebrate Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.5 Vertebrate Methodology......................................................................................................................... 10 1.6 Summary of Results............................................................................................................................... 11 2.0 Crustaceans .............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 14 2.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 15 References................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.0 Isopoda ...................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 26 References................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.0 Echinoderms ............................................................................................................................................. 29 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 29 4.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 29 4.3 Results and Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 29 References................................................................................................................................................... 33 5.0 Fishes ........................................................................................................................................................ 39 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 39 5.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 39 5.3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 40 5.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 43 References................................................................................................................................................... 44 6.0 Molluscs .................................................................................................................................................... 51 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 51 6.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 51 6.3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 52 6.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 53 6.5 Project Highlights ................................................................................................................................... 54 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................................... 55 References................................................................................................................................................... 55 7.0 Porifera (sponges) .................................................................................................................................... 65 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 65 7.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 65 7.3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 66 7.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 70 References................................................................................................................................................... 70 8.0 Cnidaria ....................................................................................................................................................... 79 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 79 8.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 79 8.3 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 79 8.4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................. 81 References................................................................................................................................................... 81 9.0 General Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 83 10.0 Future Work............................................................................................................................................. 84 11.0 Outcomes and Dissemination ............................................................................................................... 85 12.0 Benefits to the State ............................................................................................................................... 86 Cover: New species of amphipod (Crustacea) from Dongara. Photograph: C. Hass. i Executive Summary This is the final milestone report for the Central West Coast project undertaken by the Western Australian Museum (WAM) and funded by SRFME. The fieldwork component
Load more

Recommended publications
  • E Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary
    !e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary. !e intertidal zone rocky shore platform dominated by the brown alga Hormosira banksii. Photograph: John Buckeridge. iv Introduction Most Australians live near the sea – it is part of our national psyche. We exercise in it, explore it, relax by it, "sh in it – some even paint it – but most of us simply enjoy its changing modes and its fascinating beauty. Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary comprises 115 hectares of protected marine environment, located o# Beaumaris in Melbourne’s southeast ("gs 1–2). !e sanctuary includes the coastal waters from Table Rock Point to Quiet Corner, from the high tide mark to approximately 400 metres o#shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • Wallaroo Common User Export Facility Marine Ecological Assessment
    Wallaroo Common User Export Facility Marine Ecological Assessment Report for T-Ports Pty Ltd J Diversity Pty Ltd Rev 0, October 2020 Wallaroo Marine Ecological Assessment, October 2020 Cover photo: seagrass swimmer crab Nectocarcinus integrifrons in Posidonia sinuosa seagrass habitat. Photo: J. Brook, June 2020. Disclaimer The findings and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of T-Ports Pty Ltd. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this report are factually correct, the author does not accept responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the contents. The author does not accept liability for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this report. Revision history Rev Date Comment Author Reviewed A 19/08/2020 Initial Draft J. Brook M. Richardson B 10/09/2020 Modified according to review J. Brook M. Richardson C 21/09/2020 Modified according to review J. Brook M. Richardson and new information D 2/10/2020 Issued to client for circulation J. Brook 2 Wallaroo Marine Ecological Assessment, October 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................7 2 Methods..........................................................................................................................................8 2.1 Habitat mapping .....................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Marine Flora and Fauna of the Kermadec Islands Marine Reserve and Northern Kermadec Ridge, New Zealand
    www.aucklandmuseum.com Annotated checklist of the marine flora and fauna of the Kermadec Islands Marine Reserve and northern Kermadec Ridge, New Zealand Clinton A.J. Duffy Department of Conservation & Auckland War Memorial Museum Shane T. Ahyong Australian Museum & University of New South Wales Abstract At least 2086 species from 729 families are reported from the insular shelf and upper slope of the Kermadec Islands Marine Reserve and north Kermadec Ridge. The best known groups are benthic Foraminifera, benthic macroalgae, Cnidaria, Mollusca, Crustacea, Bryozoa, Echinodermata, fishes and sea birds. However knowledge of the region’s biota remains superficial and even amongst these groups new species records are commonplace. Bacteria, most planktonic groups, sessile invertebrates (particularly Porifera and Ascidiacea), infaunal and interstitial invertebrates, and parasites are largely unstudied. INTRODUCTION is a relatively large, shallow area (50–500 m depth) of complex topography located c. 105 km southwest of The Kermadec Islands are located between 636 km L’Esperance Rock in the northern part of the Central (L’Esperance and Havre Rocks) and 800 km (Raoul domain. Volcanism in this and the Southern domain is Island) NNE of New Zealand. They are large, active located west of the ridge (Smith & Price 2006). South volcanoes that rise more than 1000 m above the Kermadec of 33.3° S the ridge crest is largely located below 1000 Ridge (Ewart et al. 1977; Smith & Price 2006). The oldest m depth, eventually dipping below the sediments of the known shallow water marine sedimentary sequences Raukumara Basin at more than 2400 m depth (Smith & reported from the Kermadec Islands date from the early Price 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Product 3
    CHAPTER 5 HABITATS AS SURROGATES FOR FAUNAL AND FLORAL ASSEMBLAGES ASSOCIATED WITH ROCKY REEFS ALONG THE VICTORIAN COAST Tim O’Hara Habitats as Surrogates for Faunal and Floral Assemblages Chapter 5 CHAPTER 5 HABITATS AS SURROGATES FOR FAUNAL AND FLORAL ASSEMBLAGES ASSOCIATED WITH ROCKY REEFS ALONG THE VICTORIAN COAST 5.1 Introduction This chapter investigates if ‘habitat’ categories based on dominant vegetation types are effective surrogates for determining presence/absence of associated species. In this way the benefit of using dominant vegetation types as attributes for habitat mapping can be assessed as a useful method for representing marine biodiversity. The study targets smaller sessile and slow moving benthic fauna and flora (excluding fish) that use the canopies and holdfasts of larger dominant vegetation for primary shelter. The study also examines association patterns at various taxonomic scales in relation to different geographic locations and environmental variables. 5.1.1 Habitats as Biodiversity Surrogates The terms ‘habitats’, ‘communities’ and ‘assemblages’ have been used for over a century in the marine environment as a way of understanding and describing spatial patterns of flora and fauna (Erwin 1983). The concept of describing communities began with the recognition that there appeared to be regularly occurring suites of marine animals that exist together (Petersen 1911). Jones (1950) suggested that environmental factors might determine which suite of animals was present. For this chapter the term ‘assemblage’ is used as a synonymous term for ‘community’ that describe suites of species existing together, while the term ‘habitat’ refers to dominant flora and physical variables that provide suitable refuge and niches for other species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Sanctuary. Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Rickett's
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313025690 The Urban Sanctuary. Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Rickett’s Point Marine Sanctuary. Greypath Publications, Melbourne. 140 pp. I Book · January 2012 CITATIONS READS 0 184 2 authors: Jessica M Reeves John St James Stewart Buckeridge Federation University Australia RMIT University 28 PUBLICATIONS 800 CITATIONS 152 PUBLICATIONS 1,258 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Popularization of mathematics View project Degree (Hons) research View project All content following this page was uploaded by John St James Stewart Buckeridge on 16 January 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. !e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Life Survey Assessment of Marine Biodiversity in Geographe Bay
    Reef Life Survey Assessment of Marine Biodiversity in Geographe Bay Rick Stuart-Smith, Dani Ceccarelli, Paul Day, Graham Edgar, Antonia Cooper, Liz Oh, Camille Mellin Report to Parks Australia, Department of the Environment 2020 Citation Stuart-Smith RD, Ceccarelli DM, Day PB, Edgar GJ, Cooper AT, Oh ES, Mellin C (2020) Reef Life Survey Assessment of Marine Biodiversity in Geographe Bay. Reef Life Survey Foundation Incorporated. Copyright and disclaimer © 2020 RLSF To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The Reef Life Survey Foundation. Important disclaimer The RLSF advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, The RLSF (including its volunteers and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Images Cover: Sponge Gardens, Paul Day Remaining images: Page ii: Hypoplectrodes wilsoni, Hippo Creek, Paul Day, Page vii: Scorpaena sumptuosa, Squiggly Reef, Paul Day; Page 1: Trygonoptera ovalis, Hippo Creek, Paul Day; Page 23: Paristiopterus gallipavo, Hippo Creek, Paul Day, Page 24: Othos dentex, Hippo Creek, Paul Day; Page 26, Paraplesiops Meleagris, Hippo Creek Paul Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Template
    Recommendations for Eradication and Control of Non-indigenous, Colonial, Ascidian Tunicates in Newfoundland Harbours D. Deibel, C.H. McKenzie, M.L. Rise, R.J. Thompson, J.B. Lowen, K.C.K. Ma, G. Applin, R. O’Donnell, T. Wells, J.R. Hall, P. Sargent, and B.B. Pilgrim Science Branch, Newfoundland Region Fisheries and Oceans Canada Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre St. John’s, NL A1C 5X1 2014 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3039 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3039 2014 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ERADICATION AND CONTROL OF NON-INDIGENOUS, COLONIAL, ASCIDIAN TUNICATES IN NEWFOUNDLAND HARBOURS by D. Deibel1, C.H. McKenzie2, M.L. Rise1, R.J. Thompson1, J.B. Lowen1,3, K.C.K. Ma1,4, G. Applin1, R. O’Donnell5, T. Wells2, J.R. Hall6, P. Sargent2, B.B. Pilgrim7 Science Branch Department of Fisheries and Oceans Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre St. John’s, NL A1C 5X1 1 Department of Ocean Sciences, Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5S7 2 Science Branch, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5X1 3 Habitat Ecology Section, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, B2Y 1A6 4 Département de biologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6 5Field Services, Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5S7 6Aquatic Research Cluster, CREAIT Network, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7 7 Policy and Economics Branch, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5X1 i © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014 Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 3.7MB .Pdf File
    https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1966.27.16 2 November 1966 MEM. NAT. MUS. VICT. 27—1966 289 PORT PHILLIP SURVEY 1957-1963. ECHINODERMATA By AILSA M. CLARK. British Museum {Nat. Hist.). SUMMARY. ["he present paper deals mainly with the echinoderms collected by the Port Phillip Survey but also includes a studj of some of the specimens collected in the vicinity of Port Phillip by J. B. Wilson toward the end of the last century and deposited in the British Museum. In addition there are details of further interesting material from loi alities outside the bay, notably from Cape Schank, which was sent to me together with the Survej specimens. The report starts with a fauna list in which the species taken by the Survej or bj Wilson in Port Phillip appear in the left-hand column, while the other spe< ies that have been (01 are now) recorded from that part of the Flindersian region east of the dre.it Australian Bight from depths of less than 40 fathoms (about 7(i metres) appear on the right, r h is illustrates the limited number of species that occur within the bay. There follows the list of records of the Survey material, then details of certain of the species (including a few from outside Port Phillip) with kevs to all the species given in both sides of the fauna list, each class being treated separately. Four new species, a Starfish and three brittle-stars, are described, while remarks on an undetermined Antedonid and a Cucumarian of the genus Stereoderma, not previously represented in tin waters of southern Australia, are included.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.8MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 12 April 1971 Port Phillip Bay Survey 2 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1971.32.09 BENTHIC COMMUNITIES By J. Hope Black Abstract The depth, substrate, flora and fauna of the 317 stations worked by the survey are listed and the benthic communities represented are discussed. Introduction new species and many new records were col- lected. Also it was found that some species The benthic fauna of Port Phillip Bay was collected by earlier workers such as the 1888- collected over a period of six years, May 1957 95 survey of the Royal Society of Victoria have to May 1963. During this period collections become scarce, and are only taken now in the were made at 317 stations and all but six of Heads region. Also because previously there these were within Port Phillip Heads. Six sta- had been no systematic collecting beyond the tions were worked within the 10 fm line along sublittoral, many species only rarely taken have the open coast for comparison with the stations been found to be dominant in deeper water within the bay. Where substrate, flora and communities, e.g. Plesiastrea urvillei, Anadara fauna changed rapidly, such as many areas trapezia, and Pecten alba. It was the informa- close to shore, stations were close together. In tion gained from the survey that decided the more uniform areas such as the central silty Fisheries and Wildlife Department to open clay and clay basin within the 10 fm line, sta- Port Phillip bay to the scallop fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Ecological Information for the Proposed Recherche Archipelago Marine Conservation Reserve
    MARINE RESERVE IMPLEMENTATION: WA SOUTH COAST & EUCLA REVIEW OF EXISTING ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED RECHERCHE ARCHIPELAGO MARINE CONSERVATION RESERVE Literature Review: MRI/WSC,EUC/SIN,RAR-51/2001 A project partially funded through the Natural Heritage Trust's Coast and Clean Seas Marine Protected Area Programme Prepared by S Lee & K P Bancroft May 2001 Marine Conservation Branch Department of Conservation and Land Management 47 Henry Street, Fremantle Western Australia 6160 EEE MARINE RESERVE IMPLEMENTATION: WA SOUTH COAST & EUCLA REVIEW OF EXISTING ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED RECHERCHE ARCHIPELAGO MARINE CONSERVATION RESERVE Literature Review: MRI/WSC,EUC/SIN,RAR-51/2001 A project partially funded through the Natural Heritage Trust's Coast and Clean Seas Marine Protected Area Programme Prepared by S Lee & K P Bancroft May 2001 Marine Conservation Branch Department of Conservation and Land Management 47 Henry Street, Fremantle Western Australia 6160 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Direction · Dr Chris Simpson, Manager, Marine Conservation Branch, Nature Conservation Division, Department of Conservation and Land Management. Funding · The review of existing ecological information for the Recherche Archipelago region was partially funded by a grant through the Natural Heritage Trust's Coast and Clean Seas, Marine Protected Area Programme. · The Department of Conservation and Land Management supports the planning and the pre- declaration processes for a marine protected area in the Recherche Archipelago region with the provision of technical, logistical and human resources. Other support · The authors would like thank Mr Nick D'Adamo (Department of Conservation and Land Management), Dr Euan Harvey (University of Western Australia) and Dr Gary Kendrick (University of Western Australia) for reviewing this report and providing constructive comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Information on Preparing Tables Tables
    Jurien Bay baseline survey Ecosystem monitoring in different management zones within the Jurien Bay Marine Park - results of 2004 surveys Graham Edgar, Neville Barrett, Kevin Bancroft, James Brook and Kevin Crane Summary Densities of fishes, macroinvertebrates, corals and plants on subtidal rocky reefs within the Jurien Bay Marine Park (JBMP) were surveyed at 42 sites in October and November 2004. At the time of survey, JBMP had been created but legislation to implement the zoning scheme and hence enforce fishing restrictions was not in place. Survey data obtained in 2004 thus represent baseline conditions. Monitoring surveys utilised the same underwater visual census techniques as used in monitoring programmes operating concurrently in Tasmania, New South Wales, South Australia and Victoria, forming part of a continental-scale study of the effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs). Twenty-five JBMP sites had been censused previously in 1999, 2000 and 2003, providing a detailed time series of baseline data. Following recommendations outlined in the 2003 report (Edgar et al. 2003), the monitoring program was considerably expanded in 2004 to encompass additional sites in the outer reef region and in inshore sanctuary zones, and data on rock lobsters were obtained from eight rather than four 50 m x 1 m transect blocks at each site. The flora and fauna at different sites generally exhibited a low level of change between years compared to variation between sites. With a few exceptions, the biotic composition of sites was generally interspersed with respect to the three major MPA management zones – sanctuary, scientific reference and general use, with no zone possessing a predominance of one particular biotic assemblage type.
    [Show full text]