State of Oregon • Department of Geology and Mineral
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Marine Science Laboratory Oregon State University Vol. 34, No. 7 July 1972 • STATE OF OREGON • DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES The Ore Bin Published Monthly By • STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES • Head Office: 1069 State Office Bldg., Portland, Oregon - 97201 Telephone: 229 - 5580 FIELD OFFICES 2033 First Street 521 N. E. "E" Street Baker 97814 Grants Pass 97526 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Subscription rate - $2.00 per calendar year Available back issues $.25 each Second class postage paid at Portland, Oregon 'k 5Z 5Z 5z 5Z 5z k ',Z• 5?` 0 GOVERNING BOARD • Fayette I. Bristol, Rogue River, Chairman R. W. deWeese, Portland William E. Miller, Bend STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran GEOLOGISTS IN CHARGE OF FIELD OFFICES Norman S. Wagner, Baker Len Ramp, Grants Pass 5* 5* 5Z 5* 5* 'k 5* 5* 5* 5* 5* '`,,* 5* 5* 5* 'k 5* 5* 5* 'k Permission is granted to reprint information contained herein. • Credit given the State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries for compiling this information will be appreciated. • State of Oregon The ORE BIN Department of Geology Volume 34,No.7 and Mineral Industries 1069 State Office Bldg. July 1972 Is Portland Oregon 97201 S THE TRACE FOSSIL TISOA IN WASHINGTON AND OREGON Robert W. Frey* and John G. Cowles** Introduction Recently we described and interpreted some specimens of the trace fossil Tisoa from the Tertiary of Washington (Frey and Cowles, 1969), the first reported occurrence of this fossil burrow in North America. Specimens were collected near Megler, Washington, along a bluff facing the Columbia River (Figure 1); the fossils weathered out of the Lincoln Creek Formation. Dis- tinct variations in trace fossil morphology were observed, representing differences in behavior of the animals responsible for the burrows. • • • Figure 1. The Megler locality, Pacific County, Washington. (On Columbia River, approximately 400 feet east of boundary • between sections 8 and 9, T. 9 N., R. 9 W.) * University of Georgia Department of Geology, Athens 30601 ** Route 1, Box 96, Rainier, Oregon 97048 113 Tisoa has since been identified at various other places in Washington, but until very recently all of our attempts to locate specimens in Oregon opposite the Megler locality had failed. The fossil is now known from the • Astoria Formation (early Miocene). Considering the potential environmental, paleoecological, and pale- ontological significance of trace fossils generally (Frey, 1970, 1971), fur- • ther searches should be undertaken in Oregon and Washington, aimed at documenting variations in, and the stratigraphic and facies distributions of, this fossil burrow. Characteristics of Tisoa Megler specimens of Tisoa typically consist of two parallel tubes con- tained within elongate calcareous concretions (Figure 2A, B), which are thus very similar to specimens reported from other countries (1•Iiintzschel, 1962, Figure 137.4; 1965). The concretions collected by us are of assorted sizes but are invariably less than 15 cm in length and 7 cm in diameter. The enclosed tubes are generally 1 to 1 .4 cm in diameter, and they run the full length of the host concretion; distances between adjacent tubes range from 2.5 to 7 mm (Frey and Cowles, 1969, Figure 1). Individual tubes are com- monly lined with diagenetic pyrite, and the pairs of tubes may also be encircled by a thin layer of pyrite (Figure 3C, D). These tubes, evidently OD remaining open for a time during deposition of Lincoln Creek sediments, were eventually filled with a variety of detrital and diagenetic minerals. • Actually, rare specimens from Megler show that the "normal" twin tubes are in reality fragments of the upper part of a single U-shaped tube (Figure 3A), conceivably as much as a meter in original length (Heintzschel, 1962, p. W218). U-shaped fragments are less common now than "normal" specimens because (1) the break-up of the original structure produced more fragments of the upper part than of the basal part (Figure 4C), and (2) the basal part may have been less well constructed by the burrowing animal originally (Frey and Cowles, 1969, p. 19). Rare Megler specimens also show that the tubes are not invariably straight (Figure 4A) and that the twin tubes may branch into additional pairs of tubes (Figure 4B). Furthermore, single-tube varieties of Tisoa are fairly common at this locality (Figure 2C); although these are identical to "normal" specimens in all other respects, no evidence for an original second tube has been observed. Peculiarly, many of the tisoans observed at various places in Wash- ington, other than Megler, consist predominantly of the single-tube variety, • and at some localities the "normal" twin tubes are apparently very rare. Weldon W. Rau (1968, personal communication) wrote us that: • "Although we frequently find concretions with a single tube of some sort in the middle, I do not recall ever seeing any like your specimens with the double tube. Those I have 114 enclosed (by mail) are not particularly good specimens but are a sample from outcrops where I saw hundreds and pos- • sibly thousands. They were all oriented with the long axis normal to bedding. They range from a few inches up to possibly 8 inches in length. They all seem to have evidence • of a crude tube through the middle." 2 cm • Figure 2. Tisoans from Megler. A,B. Typical double-tube specimens. C. Typical single-tube specimen. D. Bivalve Lucinoma cf. L. acutilineata (Conrad) embedded in tisoan concretion. E. Fish fin on side of tisoan concretion. 115 • 2 cm Figure 3. Tisoans from Megler. A. Longitudinal section through U-shaped tube (outlined in ink). B. Longitudinal view of tube fragment, mostly weathered out of its concretion, showing scratch marks. C. Transverse • view of tisoan having pyrite concentrations around tubes and circumfer- ence of concretion. D. Transverse section through concretion contain- • ing three pairs of tubes, each lined with pyrite (cf. Figure 4B). The morphological variations and interrelationships among local and regional assemblages of Tisoa thus clearly need additional study. Such work may eventually show that- the genus is too broadly conceived and that it could realistically be split into two genera, although we would certainly discourage taxonomic splitting if possible (see Frey, 1971, p. 103-104). Interpretation of Tisoa The wall linings seen in many tisoan tubes suggest that the burrowing animal reinforced its domicile with organic secretions, which later reacted biogeochemically and thus helped concentrate secondary minerals such as pyrite (see Frey, 1971, p. 101-102). These alterations and the formation of enveloping concretions took place early in diagenesis, as suggested by a nearly intact fish fin and a closely articulated clam found embedded in • tisoon concretions (Figure 20, E); otherwise, bioturbation and other sedi- mentary and diagenetic processes probably would have disarticulatecl and • scattered these fossil remains. On the basis of morphology, requisite behavior, and the presence of small scratch marks on certain burrow walls (Figure 3B), we interpret Tisoa 116 B Figure 4. Reconstructions of Megler tisoans. A. Spiraled tubes. • B. Branched tubes (cf. Figure 3D). C. Hypothetical specimen illustrating how several short, double-tube tisoans may be der- • ived from a single long, U-shaped tube. as the dwelling burrow of a shrimp- or amphipod-like arthropod (Frey and Cowles, 1969, p. 20). None of our burrow specimens contain arthropod remains, and virtually none of the fossil arthropods reported by Weaver (1942) are likely candidates; yet arthropod remains are rarely found even in well-documented Holocene and fossil arthropod burrows (Bromley, 1967, p. 170-172). A possible exception among invertebrates reported by Weaver are such decapods as Callianassa knapptonensis (Rathbun, 1926, p. 112-113, Pl. 38, Figure 4), collected from the Oligocene near Megler. By analogy with the Holocene shrimp C. californiensis (Warme, 1967), C. knapptonensis conceiv- ably could have constructed tisoan burrows having smooth exteriors, rather than the more popularly known knobby exteriors of Holocene C. major bur- rows and Ophiomorpha (Weimer and Hoyt, 1964). Callianassa californiensis l imbs, • does not, of course, make U-shaped burrows having closely oppressed but certain other features of the burrow are somewhat comparable. Overall, the burrowing habits reflected by Megler tisoans are more • like that of the Holocene amphipod Corophium volutator (see 1-16ntzschel, 1939), although the tisoan organism must have been substantially larger in size. 117 Distribution of Tisoa Tisoa was previously known only from foreign localities, including the • Oligocene of Tunisia, Cretaceous of Russia, and Jurassic of France and Madagascar (Heintzschel, 1962, p. W218). Hartmut U. Wiedemann (1970, personal communication) informed us that he has also observed the trace fos- • sil in Jurassic marls near Aalen, Wiirttenberg, Germany. Specimens from all of these localities consist predominantly of the twin-tube variety. We have collected additional specimens southeast of Megler, espe- cially on the western slope of K M Mountain, half a mile or more below the summit, along U.S. Highway 101. Weldon W. Rau (1968, 1971, personal communications) notes having seen Tisoa-like concretions in several other places, including the structures mentioned in his report on the Quinault Formation (Rau, 1970, p. 10). We examined a few of his specimens and found them extremely similar to those from Megler. Specimens from all of these localities consist mostly (or perhaps wholly) of the single-tube variety however. In contrast, we have not personally located any unequivocal tisoans in Oregon. On the Oregon side of the Columbia we collected certain of the fossils and other concretions associated with Tisoa at Megler but no unmistakable evidence of Tisoa itself. Recently, however, Sam Boggs of the University of Oregon informed us (1971, personal communication) that • he has collected a few specimens from an area along Youngs River near Astoria; we examined some of these specimens (from the Astoria Formation) • and indeed found them to be single- and double-tube varieties of Tisoa, the latter being rare.