DOCSLIB.ORG

Ripiro Beach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ripiro Beach http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. The modification of toheroa habitat by streams on Ripiro Beach A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Research) in Environmental Science at The University of Waikato by JANE COPE 2018 ―We leave something of ourselves behind when we leave a place, we stay there, even though we go away. And there are things in us that we can find again only by going back there‖ – Pascal Mercier, Night train to London i Abstract Habitat modification and loss are key factors driving the global extinction and displacement of species. The scale and consequences of habitat loss are relatively well understood in terrestrial environments, but in marine ecosystems, and particularly soft sediment ecosystems, this is not the case. The characteristics which determine the suitability of soft sediment habitats are often subtle, due to the apparent homogeneity of sandy environments. This can make it difficult to detect habitat change in the first place let alone understand ecological consequences. Subtle differences in habitat quality are even harder to detect on dynamic surf beaches which are controlled by the interactions between the wave climate and the beach sands, and experience frequent and large changes. The exposed surf beaches of northern New Zealand, are home to toheroa (Paphies ventricosa), an endemic surf clam and New Zealand‘s most protected shell fish species. Over the course of the 20th century, toheroa were harvested to the point of collapse resulting in the closure of an important cultural, recreational and commercial fishery. Despite more than 40 years of protection, toheroa populations have failed to recover with populations in most locations continuing to decline. In northern New Zealand toheroa distribution is strongly associated with the small streams which flow across the toheroa beaches. A reduction in the flow of fresh water to the beach via these streams has been suggested as one possible factor which may be preventing the recovery of toheroa. However, little is known about the characteristics of the habitat, and the mechanism driving this toheroa-stream relationship has not received specific attention. The objective of this research was to better understand the effect of streams on beach habitat in the hope of determining the drivers of toheroa distribution. Specifically, I investigated how sediment type, topography, water table depth and sediment temperatures varied across exposed intertidal sediments adjacent to and away from streams. Sampling took place at four sites along Ripiro Beach during the summer, the season when toheroa are most susceptible to thermal stress and streams are thought to provide some protection from dissipation and heat stress. Grainsize distributions from the sampled sediment cores were processed using a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 laser ii diffractometer (Malvern, UK). The surface elevation and sediment temperature profiles of the subaerial beach was measured using a theodolite CDN pro accurate waterproof thermometers (Model DTW450L). Temperatures were measured at five sediment depths (2cm, 4cm, 7.5cm, 10.5cm, 20.5cm) throughout the sampling period. The effect of the streams on the grain size distribution of intertidal sediments appeared to be limited to the high tide, where the proportion of fine sediments was highest in stream adjacent sediments. Greater variations in grain size occurred along the beach, but the greatest difference in sediment sizes occurred when contrasting current day beach grain size distributions with sediment data collected in 1974. Beach sediments from 2017 contained 26661% time more medium sediment indicating the beach is now much coaster than it was 44 years ago. However, as no time series is available for sediment composition at Ripiro it is uncertain whether this change in beach make up is indicative of year-to-year variation or a long term trend. Beach topography varied consistently in the vicinity of streams. The elevation and slope of the beach face was lowest in the path of streams. Along the upper beach, low elevation in the path of the stream lead to the formation of deep bowl like features. As a result of this topography, adjacent to the stream, the water table remained close to the sediment surface throughout the sampling period (< 20 cm), in contrast to point‘s away from the stream where the water table was below the sampling depth. The hypothesis that streams would provide a thermal refuge for toheroa was one of the key questions of this thesis. What I found was that stream driven difference in sediment temperatures were only apparent in the upper intestinal, the area occupied by juvenile toheroa when they first recruit to the beach. Temperatures away from streams were significantly higher (> 3.5 °C) than stream adjacent sediments. However, in the middle intestinal, the area occupied by adult toheroa, the seep face exerted a greater influence on sediment temperatures than the stream and temperatures were no different regardless of stream proximity. The findings of this study suggest that the toheroa-stream relationship is not a direct response to the presence of freshwater, but rather is driven by the modification of the intertidal sediments by the streams. The increased erosion in these areas reduces iii the distance between the sediment surface and the water table, increasing the moisture content of the sediments. Additionally, the formation of the basin like depressions in the upper intertidal may act to aggregate spat and juvenile toheroa through the effect of this topography on the beach swash regime. At mid-tide areas adjacent to streams, the depth of the water table was such that adult toheroa are likely to be either fully or partially immersed throughout the low tide. Away from streams, the water table is beyond the burrowing depth of toheroa. For both juveniles and adults, stream associated areas may provide important protection against desiccation, through increasing moisture content of the sediments and for juveniles through reduced sediment temperatures. Evidently, streams do modify beach habitat in a way ‏that makes it inhabitable for toheroa. Just not in the way that was anticipated. This study has increased our knowledge of beach characteristics that provide good toheroa habitat. Further research is required to test these hypotheses and better understand the effects of climate and terrestrial land use on beach state and therefore the suitability of the beach for toheroa. iv Acknowledgements Many thanks to my supervisors Phil Ross, Willem de Lange, Conrad Pilditch, Shade Smith and James Williams for your input, support and encouragement during this thesis and in the years leading up to it. Phil, a baptism by fire for sure! Thank you for the hours of investment and mentoring and the final drag to the finishing line. I‘m not certain if you chose well, or if it was me, but I do know that there is nothing else that I would rather have worked on. The charismatic appeal of clams and toheroa in particular, is severely underrated To those who made this project about more than just science and clams. This includes kaitiaki, iwi and the many locals from the Ripiro Beach region (and a Southlander). Special thanks go to Barry and Robyn Searle, and Jim Te Tui. Barry and Robyn, your support, encouragement and friendship has been greatly valued, as has your passion and lifelong commitment to toheroa and the wider environment. The responsibility of kaitiakitanga is now one I share with you. A wonderful gift in its own right. Thanks too to the wonderful families that opened their homes to me during extended stays up north. I‘d also like to thank Katrin Berkenbusch for the opportunity to be part of the Southland toheroa survey. #TeamToheroa – special shout out. May the epic roadies and long days on the beach last forever. Jadern, Felicia, Ming – best science and travel buddies one could wish for. You guys have been incredible. Thanks too to Nikki and Ryan for their help during my data collection. To the wonderful folk at the coastal marine field station. Academics, staff, students, my own cohort. You are like family, and by that, I mean I did not get to choose you… but I wouldn‘t want it any other way. Most of the time anyway. To my cohort with the luxury of time, over the next six months of your write up, I will make sure you know every time I‘m out sailing, skiing, diving, surfing, holidaying, fishing, doing nothing. Seriously though, thank you for everything. It‘s been an epic five years. Special mention here to Chris, thank you for everything. v For everyone who has helped with this research in some capacity, thank you. I hope your minds have been broadened. In no particular order: Chris, Kim, Phil, Jax, Vanessa, Joey, Fenna, Vanessa, Ryan, Helen, Soli, Alice, Dave, Dan, Carlos, Holly, Kirsty, Kirsten, Nikki, Felicia, Jarderne, To my family, I suspect you will all be prouder of this accomplishment than I‘ll ever be. I guess being a scientist makes it officially acceptable for me to wear socks with my crocs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gomphina Veneriformis and Tegillaca Granosa)
    Dev. Reprod. Vol. 14, No. 1, 7-11 (2010) 7 Germ Cell Aspiration (GCA) Method as a Non-fatal Technique for Sex Identification in Two Bivalves (Gomphina veneriformis and Tegillaca granosa) † Jung Sick Lee1, Sun Mi Ju1, Ji Seon Park1, Young Guk Jin2, Yun Kyung Shin3 and Jung Jun Park4 1Dept. of Aqualife Medicine, Chonnam National University, Yeosu 550-749, Korea 2South Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Yeosu 556-823, Korea 3Aquaculture Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Busan 619-705, Korea 4Pathology Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Busan 619-705, Korea ABSTRACT : This study attempted to verify the possibility of using germ cell aspiration (GCA) method as a non-fatal technique in studying the life-history of equilateral venus, Gomphina veneriformis (Veneridae) and granular ark, Tegillarca granosa (Arcidae). Using twenty-six gauge 1/2" (12.7㎜) needle, GCA was carried out in equilateral venus through external ligament. In granular ark, GCA was performed by preventing closure of the shells by inserting a tongue depressor between the shells while still open. The success rate of sex identification using the GCA method was 95.6% for the equilateral venus (n=650/680) and 94.3% for the granular ark (n=707/750). Mortality of equilateral venus, which spent 33 days under wild conditions, was 13.8% (n=90/650) while the mortality of granular ark, which spent 390 days under wild conditions, was 2.4% (n=17/707). Although we believe that GCA does not appear to cause death in equilateral venus or granular ark, the success rate in employing of this methodology may differ depending on the level of proficiency of the researcher and reproductive stage of the bivalve.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • AEBR 114 Review of Factors Affecting the Abundance of Toheroa Paphies
    Review of factors affecting the abundance of toheroa (Paphies ventricosa) New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 114 J.R. Williams, C. Sim-Smith, C. Paterson. ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-0-478-41468-4 (online) June 2013 Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries websites at: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-resources/publications.aspx http://fs.fish.govt.nz go to Document library/Research reports © Crown Copyright - Ministry for Primary Industries TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2 2. METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 3 3. TIME SERIES OF ABUNDANCE .................................................................................. 3 3.1 Northland region beaches .......................................................................................... 3 3.2 Wellington region beaches ........................................................................................ 4 3.3 Southland region beaches .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Islands of the Basicbasic Informationinformation Onon Thethe Marinemarine Resourcesresources Ofof Thethe Cookcook Islandsislands
    Basic Information on the Marine Resources of the Cook Islands Basic Information on the Marine Resources of the Cook Islands Produced by the Ministry of Marine Resources Government of the Cook Islands and the Information Section Marine Resources Division Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) with financial assistance from France . Acknowledgements The Ministry of Marine Resources wishes to acknowledge the following people and organisations for their contribution to the production of this Basic Information on the Marine Resources of the Cook Islands handbook: Ms Maria Clippingdale, Australian Volunteer Abroad, for compiling the information; the Cook Islands Natural Heritage Project for allowing some of its data to be used; Dr Mike King for allowing some of his drawings and illustration to be used in this handbook; Aymeric Desurmont, Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) Fisheries Information Specialist, for formatting and layout and for the overall co-ordination of efforts; Kim des Rochers, SPC English Editor for editing; Jipé Le-Bars, SPC Graphic Artist, for his drawings of fish and fishing methods; Ministry of Marine Resources staff Ian Bertram, Nooroa Roi, Ben Ponia, Kori Raumea, and Joshua Mitchell for reviewing sections of this document; and, most importantly, the Government of France for its financial support. iii iv Table of Contents Introduction .................................................... 1 Tavere or taverevere ku on canoes ................................. 19 Geography ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological Effects and Biotransformation of Paralytic
    PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND BIOTRANSFORMATION OF PARALYTIC SHELLFISH TOXINS IN NEW ZEALAND MARINE BIVALVES ______________________________________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences in the University of Canterbury by Andrea M. Contreras 2010 Abstract Although there are no authenticated records of human illness due to PSP in New Zealand, nationwide phytoplankton and shellfish toxicity monitoring programmes have revealed that the incidence of PSP contamination and the occurrence of the toxic Alexandrium species are more common than previously realised (Mackenzie et al., 2004). A full understanding of the mechanism of uptake, accumulation and toxin dynamics of bivalves feeding on toxic algae is fundamental for improving future regulations in the shellfish toxicity monitoring program across the country. This thesis examines the effects of toxic dinoflagellates and PSP toxins on the physiology and behaviour of bivalve molluscs. This focus arose because these aspects have not been widely studied before in New Zealand. The basic hypothesis tested was that bivalve molluscs differ in their ability to metabolise PSP toxins produced by Alexandrium tamarense and are able to transform toxins and may have special mechanisms to avoid toxin uptake. To test this hypothesis, different physiological/behavioural experiments and quantification of PSP toxins in bivalves tissues were carried out on mussels ( Perna canaliculus ), clams ( Paphies donacina and Dosinia anus ), scallops ( Pecten novaezelandiae ) and oysters ( Ostrea chilensis ) from the South Island of New Zealand. Measurements of clearance rate were used to test the sensitivity of the bivalves to PSP toxins. Other studies that involved intoxication and detoxification periods were carried out on three species of bivalves ( P.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos
    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, Bivalves, Sea Snails, Sea Slugs, Octopus, Squid, Tusk Shell
    Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shell Bruce Marshall, Steve O’Shea with additional input for squid from Neil Bagley, Peter McMillan, Reyn Naylor, Darren Stevens, Di Tracey Phylum Aplacophora In New Zealand, these are worm-like molluscs found in sandy mud. There is no shell. The tiny MOLLUSCA solenogasters have bristle-like spicules over Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea almost the whole body, a groove on the underside of the body, and no gills. The more worm-like slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shells caudofoveates have a groove and fewer spicules but have gills. There are 10 species, 8 undescribed. The mollusca is the second most speciose animal Bivalvia phylum in the sea after Arthropoda. The phylum Clams, mussels, oysters, scallops, etc. The shell is name is taken from the Latin (molluscus, soft), in two halves (valves) connected by a ligament and referring to the soft bodies of these creatures, but hinge and anterior and posterior adductor muscles. most species have some kind of protective shell Gills are well-developed and there is no radula. and hence are called shellfish. Some, like sea There are 680 species, 231 undescribed. slugs, have no shell at all. Most molluscs also have a strap-like ribbon of minute teeth — the Scaphopoda radula — inside the mouth, but this characteristic Tusk shells. The body and head are reduced but Molluscan feature is lacking in clams (bivalves) and there is a foot that is used for burrowing in soft some deep-sea finned octopuses. A significant part sediments. The shell is open at both ends, with of the body is muscular, like the adductor muscles the narrow tip just above the sediment surface for and foot of clams and scallops, the head-foot of respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminants in Shellfish Flesh an Investigation Into Microbiological and Trace Metal Contaminants in Shellfish from Selected Locations in the Wellington Region
    Contaminants in shellfish flesh An investigation into microbiological and trace metal contaminants in shellfish from selected locations in the Wellington region Prepared by: J R Milne Environmental Monitoring and Investigations Greater Wellington Regional Council Executive summary The Wellington region’s varied and extensive coastline is utilised for both traditional and recreational harvesting of a number of shellfish species. Greater Wellington Regional Council periodically monitors the safety of these shellfish for human consumption. This report presents the results of the 2006 investigation, focusing on microbiological and trace metal contaminants in tuatua, cockles and blue mussels from selected sites in the western Wellington region. Faecal coliform indicator bacteria were detected in eight out of a total of 58 shellfish samples. Four of the eight results above detection were recorded in cockle samples collected from Porirua Harbour. No samples had bacteria present at a concentration that exceeded the recommended microbiological guidelines for edible tissue. Cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc were all present in the three species of shellfish examined. However, none of the metal concentrations exceeded the national food standards for edible tissue, where standards exist. The tuatua and cockle sample results showed little spatial variation in mean metal concentrations, with similar concentrations recorded between most sampling sites. However, there was some spatial variation in metal concentrations in the mussel samples from Wellington Harbour. Samples collected adjacent to Frank Kitts Park and the Thorndon Container Wharf in the inner harbour generally recorded the highest concentrations, while samples collected from Mahanga Bay, Shark Bay and Sunshine Bay consistently recorded the lowest concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Seashells Shells Joined Together
    What shell is this? Many of the shells you see on the beach were once two Seashells shells joined together. These shells are called bivalves. by Feana Tu‘akoi Sometimes you will find them still joined, but mostly they have broken away from the other shell. Bivalves are the most common seashells washed up on our beaches. They include the shells of pipi, tuatua, oysters, mussels, and scallops. Some shells, such as limpets and pāua, are single shells. They might have small holes in the top. Other single shells, such as the Cookʼs Turban shell, are shaped like a spiral. Mussel shell Pipi shell Many of New Zealandʼs beaches are covered in shells – little shells, big shells, smooth shells, flat shells, and curly shells. Some shells are plain, and some have Cookʼs Turban shell patterns. Have you ever wondered where all these shells come from? Empty homes Almost all seashells were once homes for sea creatures. When the creatures inside the shells die or are eaten by predators, their shells are left behind. Many of the empty shells get washed up onto the beach. Limpet shell 2 3 Molluscs Shell science We often call the creatures that live in shells “shellfish” Hamish Spencer is a shell scientist. – but they are not really fish. They are part of a group of He studies shells and shellfish, and he creatures called molluscs. finds them fascinating. A mollusc has a soft body and no bones, but many Hamish has seen some unusual shellfish. Hamish Spencer molluscs have a hard shell. The shell helps to keep the “A shipworm has a body that looks like mollusc safe from predators such as seagulls, crabs, a worm, but with two small shells fish, and other, bigger, molluscs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostrea Angasi) Farming Industry in New South Wales
    Paving the way for continued rapid development of the flat (angasi) oyster (Ostrea angasi) farming industry in New South Wales Mike Heasman1, Ben K. Diggles2, David Hurwood3, Peter Mather3, Igor Pirozzi1 and Symon Dworjanyn1 1NSW Fisheries Port Stephens Fisheries Centre Private Bag 1 Nelson Bay NSW 2315 2NIWA Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 359 Wilston Qld 4051 3School of Natural Resource Sciences Queensland University of Technology GPO Box 2434 Brisbane Qld 4001 Final Report to the Department of Transport & Regional Services Project No. NT002/0195 June 2004 NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 66 ISSN 1440-3544 Paving the way for continued rapid development of the flat (angasi) oyster (Ostrea angasi) farming industry in New South Wales Mike Heasman1, Ben K. Diggles2, David Hurwood3, Peter Mather3, Igor Pirozzi1 and Symon Dworjanyn1 1NSW Fisheries Port Stephens Fisheries Centre Private Bag 1 Nelson Bay NSW 2315 2NIWA Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 359 Wilston Qld 4051 3School of Natural Resource Sciences Queensland University of Technology GPO Box 2434 Brisbane Qld 4001 Final Report to the Department of Transport & Regional Services Project No. NT002/0195 June 2004 NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No.66 ISSN 1440-3544 Paving the way for continued rapid development of the flat (angasi) oyster (Ostrea angasi) farming in NSW June 2004 Authors: Michael P. Heasman, Ben K. Diggles, David Hurwood and Peter Mather, Igor Pirozzi and Symon Dworjanyn Published By: NSW Fisheries Postal Address: Private Bag 1, Nelson Bay NSW 2315 Internet: www.fisheries.nsw.gov.au NSW Fisheries and the Department of Transport & Regional Services This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Shellfish Hatchery for the Wider Caribbean Assessing Its Feasibility and Sustainability
    FAO ISSN 2070-6103 19 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS 19 19 A regional shellfish hatchery for the Wider Caribbean Assessing its feasibility and sustainability A regional shellfish hatchery for the Wider Caribbean – Assessing its feasibility and sustainability A regional FAO Regional Technical Workshop A regional shellfish hatchery for 18–21 October 2010 Kingston, Jamaica the Wider Caribbean It is widely recognized that the development of aquaculture in Assessing its feasibility and sustainability the Wider Caribbean Region is inhibited, in part, by the lack of technical expertise, infrastructure, capital investment and human resources. Furthermore, seed supply for native species FAO Regional Technical Workshop relies, for the most part, on natural collection, subject to 18–21 October 2010 natural population abundance with wide yearly variations. This Kingston, Jamaica situation has led to the current trend of culturing more readily available exotic species, but with a potentially undesirable impact on the natural environment. The centralizing of resources available in the region into a shared facility has been recommended by several expert meetings over the past 20 years. The establishment of a regional hatchery facility, supporting sustainable aquaculture through the seed production of native molluscan species was discussed at the FAO workshop “Regional shellfish hatchery: A feasibility study” held in Kingston, Jamaica, in October 2010, by representatives of Caribbean Governments and experts in the field. Molluscan species are particularly targeted due to their culture potential in terms of known techniques, simple grow-out technology and low impact on surrounding environment. It is proposed that a regional molluscan hatchery would produce seed for sale and distribution to grow-out operations in the region as well as provide technical support for the research on new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Panopea Abrupta ) Ecology and Aquaculture Production
    COMPREHENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEW AND SYNOPSIS OF ISSUES RELATING TO GEODUCK ( PANOPEA ABRUPTA ) ECOLOGY AND AQUACULTURE PRODUCTION Prepared for Washington State Department of Natural Resources by Kristine Feldman, Brent Vadopalas, David Armstrong, Carolyn Friedman, Ray Hilborn, Kerry Naish, Jose Orensanz, and Juan Valero (School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington), Jennifer Ruesink (Department of Biology, University of Washington), Andrew Suhrbier, Aimee Christy, and Dan Cheney (Pacific Shellfish Institute), and Jonathan P. Davis (Baywater Inc.) February 6, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................v 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 General life history ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Predator-prey interactions........................................................................... 2 1.3 Community and ecosystem effects of geoducks......................................... 2 1.4 Spatial structure of geoduck populations.................................................... 3 1.5 Genetic-based differences at the population level ...................................... 3 1.6 Commercial geoduck hatchery practices ...................................................
    [Show full text]