DOCSLIB.ORG

A Farming Systems Research Bibliography of Kansas State University's Vertical File Materials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Farming Systems Research Bibliography of Kansas State University's Vertical File Materials A FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY OF KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY'S VERTICAL FILE MATERIALS. REVISED. Gretchen A. Graham, Editor* Paper No. 4. Revised July 1986 Resources on Developing Countries Farrell Library Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 66506 U.S.A. *Data entry and data base programming by Susan Powell, Research Assistant and Master Candidate, Dept. of Computer Science, KSU. 2005 Digital Edition Kansas State University Digital Library Department FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH PAPER SERIES Kansas State University’s Farming Systems Research (FSR) Paper Series is supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development Title XII Program Support Grant. The goal of the Program Support Grant is to increase the University’s ability to implement Title XII agricultural and nutritional development assistance programs in less-developed countries. This paper series is maintained by the FSR Program Associates -- a multidisciplinary team of professors who are aiming their activities at applied research on farming from a systems perspective. The purpose of the FSR Paper Series is to disseminate infor- mation on FSR. Publication categories include updated bibliographies from KSU’s FSR data base; proceedings from KSU’s FSR Systems Symposium; selected papers presented in KSU’s FSR Seminar Series; selected papers prepared by KSU’s Programs Associates. Vernon C. Larson Director International Agricultural Programs NOTICE OF NONDISCRIMINATION Kansas State University is committed to a policy of non-discrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin, handicap, or other non-merit reasons, in admissions, educational programs or activities, and employ- ment, all as required by applicable laws and regulations. Responsibility for coordination of compliance efforts and receipt of inquiries, including those concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, has been delegated to Jane D. Rowlett, Ph.D., Director, Affirmative Action Office, 214 Anderson Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (913-532-6220). University ii FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND THE KSU COLLECTION Kansas State University is one of the increasing number of insti- tutions involved in farming systems research (FSR). The Library has organized a collection of materials available to persons inter- ested in the subject. The Technical Advisory Committee’s Review Team of Farming Systems Research has defined a farming system as: "a complicated, interwoven mesh of soils, plants, animals, implements, workers, other inputs and environmental influ- ences with the strands held and manipulated by a person called the farmer who, given his preferences and aspirations, attempts to produce output from the inputs and technology available to him. It is the farmer’s unique understanding of his immediate environment, both natural and socio- economic, that results in his farming system.” It goes on to describe FSR as: "research (including training) which: (1) is conducted with a recognition of and focusing towards the interdepen- dencies and inter-relationships that exist among elements of the farm system, and between these elements and the farm environment; and (2) is aimed at enhancing the efficacy of farming systems through the better focusing of agricul- tural research so as to facilitate the generation and test- ing of improved technology." "The major activities involved in FSR are: (a) The collection and analysis of base data; (b) The study of existing farming systems; (c) The design of new farming systems; (d) Farm systems experimentation; and (e) The evaluation and monitoring of new farming systems." 1 THE REVISED EDITION... lists FSR vertical file material and selected publications with Library of Congress classification numbers found within KSU's Library. The vertical file material includes unpublished papers, drafts, house organs and other non-conventional items. Keyword, title and primary author indices are provided. The standard for keywording is an "enhanced" CAB Thesaurus. 1 Farming Systems Research at the International Agricul- tural Research Centers. Washington, World Bank for TAC Secretariat/ FAO, 1978, page 8. iii PARTS OF THE CITATIONS date of place of author publication title publication publisher series pages 1686 Collison, M.P. (1982) FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH IN EASTERN AFRICA: THE EXPERIENCE OF CIMMYT AND SOME NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICES, 1976-81. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics. (MSU International Development Papers 3) 61p. CIMMYT/small farms/FSR/innovation adoptfordon-farm testing/problem identifi- cation/surveys, short-term/target selection/socioeconomic constraints/Kenya/ Farming Systems national programmes and projects/Zambia/Tanzania/Zimbabwe/solution design number KSUL # S542.A37 C64 1982 KSUL, SuDoc or Vertical File keywords call number iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Farming Systems: Descriptive (general and inclusive).................. 1 Cropping Patterns.............................................. 16 Polyculture................................................ 26 Double or triple crops...................................... 34 Fallowing and cover cropping, tillage systems............... 38 Crop rotations............................................ 39 Shifting cultivation....................................... 40 Plantations and agro-silviculture.......................... 41 Animal Systems................................................ 42 Mixed Systems (animals and plants)............................ 48 Aquaculture and agriculture................................... 56 Physical and Biological Factors..................................... 57 Physical Factors................................................ 60 Land, soils and fertilizer.................................. 61 Agroclimatology............................................ 66 Water end water management.................................. 68 Biological Factors............................................. 70 Crops...................................................... 70 Crop protection............................................75 Weeds.................................................. 76 Animal kingdom......................................... 78 Fungi and bacteria..................................... 79 Human Element: Exogenous Factors................................ 79 Social Organization and Community Structure.................... 84 Physical Environment (built environment)........................87 Community Norms and Beliefs.................................... 87 Population, Nutrition and Health................................ 88 External Institutions........................................... 91 Infrastructure, support systems............................. 93 Input.................................................. 94 Extension.......................................... 94 Credit.............................................96 Output.................................................97 Marketing..........................................97 Post harvest storage................................99 Processing........................................ 100 Policies and structural reform programs.................... 100 Technological and Mechanical Factors.......................... 103 Mechanization (other than animal traction, which falls in mixed farming)................................. 105 Energy................................................... 107 Technology transfer....................................... 107 Appropriate technology................................... 114 Recommended technology................................... 117 Human Element: Endogenous Factore (household)........................ 118 Goals and Risks.................................................126 Economic Inputs................................................ 129 Land......................................................131 Labor management.......................................... 132 Economic Output.................................................135 Income.................................................... 135 Food...................................................... 137 Farming Systems Research Methodology.............................. 138 Survey Techniques (descriptive and diagnostic methods)........... 150 Design of Improved Technology............................... 158 Testing........................................................ 161 FSR Methodology Extension and Transfer........................ 165 Systems Analysis............................................... 172 Institutional Factors in Implementation of Farming Systems Research...................................................... 175 v ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science ACDI Agricultural Cooperative Development International ACIAR Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research AICRPDA All India Coordinated Project for Dryland Agriculture AD Agricultural Administration ADB Asian Development Bank ADC Agricultural Development Council ADNP Agricultural Development Ngamiland Project AFTRCW/UNECA African Training and Research Centre for Women/United Nations Economic Commission for Africa AIA agricultor-investigacion-agricultor AID Agency for International Development AID/S&T Agency for International Development/Bureau for Science and Technology ALDEP Arable Lands Development Programme ASA American Society of Agronomy ASAE American Society of Agricultural Engineers ASHA/AHS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mixed Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Mixed farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa M A Mohammed-Saleem - International Livestock Research Institute, P O Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Introduction The farming situation in sub-Saharan Africa Why mixed farming? Land use changes in sub-Saharan Africa Constraints Research Conclusions References Introduction Development objectives for sub-Saharan Africa are moving towards resource conservation and natural resource management while striving for greater agricultural production. Economic growth must increase by 4-5 per cent annually if food security is to be achieved and a modest standard of living provided for the 1.3 billion people expected in the region by 2025 (World Bank, 1989). Rapid urban population growth (55 per cent of Africans will live in urban areas in 2025) and higher income will create a need for better quality food, particularly of animal origin, from a rural population that is expected to feed 592 million by 2025 compared to 350 million in 1990. This is an enormous challenge in a region that experienced a negative per caput GDP during the 1980s. The 3.2 per cent average annual population growth and severe financial and environmental crises portend an even gloomier future. Agricultural intensification is inevitable in sub-Saharan Africa and livestock are critical to the development of sustainable and environmentally sound production systems. Intensification has occurred gradually over many years in other developing regions but in Africa it will need to happen over a very short time due to rapid population growth. Past research and development efforts which promoted crop-livestock systems have failed to bring about the desired agricultural transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH Immshiïî DE RECHERCHES
    RESEARCH IMMSHiïî DE RECHERCHES NATIONAL HISTORIC PARKS DIRECTION DES LIEUX ET DES AND SITES BRANCH PARCS HISTORIQUES NATIONAUX No. 77 January 1978 An Annotated Bibliography For the Study of Animal Husbandry in The Canadian Prairie West 1880-1925 Part A - Sources Available in Western Canada and United States Introduction This annotated bibliography pinpoints materials useful in studying animal husbandry as a part of mixed farming. All re­ ferences to ranching have been omitted. Since Canadian his­ torians have not focused their efforts on the history of prairie animal husbandry with any vigour, this study must be regarded as only a starting point. Statistics gleaned from Annual Reports of the Saskatchewan Department of Agriculture provide evidence that animal husban­ dry, as part of mixed farming, played only a supporting role in that province's economy. Commencing during the early 1880s with the appearance of a few odd farm animals in the North West Territories, livestock numbers rose to a level that provided a total cash value equivalent to slightly more than the in­ come derived from oats cultivation in 1920. The factors that made animal husbandry viable are easy to pinpoint; advances in veterinary science virtually eliminated animal disease in Saskatchewan by 1925, and animal-rearing techniques kept pace with veterinary achievements. However the limited extent of livestock production indicates that there were serious dis­ advantages. The failure to adapt barn technology to mitigate the extremities of the prairie winter resulted in problems in wintering stock. This combined with high grain prices from 1900-20, and costly barns, silos and machinery, discouraged the average dry land farmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Research Centre No
    In this bumper issue: 2. News in brief 3. Editorial 4. Netherlands study tour 6. Organic potato guide 8. Farmer principles of health 11. Policy developments 12. Organic farm incomes in England 13. ORC at NOCC 2017 14. ‘Ancient’ wheats for food diversity 15. Intercropping 16. ORC Wakelyns Population 17. New trustees at ORC 18. Project news 19. Staff news 20. ‘Tree to Heat’ workshop 21. Agroforestry comes of age 22. Tree fodder 23. Book review/SRUC study tour 24. Farming without antibiotics 26. Ticking the anti-globalisation box 28. Events and announcements Cover photo Intercropping Fuego beans and Paragon wheat at National Organic Combinable crops 2017 (p15) Subscribe to Organic Research Centre the Bulletin 2-4 issues per year for £25 in the UK (£30 overseas) from organicresearchcentre.com No. 122Bulletin – Spring/Summer 2017 ORC Bulletin No. 122 - Spring/Summer 2017 News in brief OCW producer survey shows rise in organic sales Innovative Farmers now free to join from Welsh farms After 18 months of enabling farmers to lead the way in The Organic Centre Wales 2016 producer survey report has practical, on-farm innovation, in April the Innovative Farmers shown a rise in sales of organic products, despite a fall in network announced significant changes to make it easier for there has been an increase in the number of farms and the even more farmers to benefit. Joining the network is now free, landthe land area area covered certified by the as Glastirorganic Organic in Wales. scheme, At the andsame there time, labs and attend network events without paying an annual meaning everyone can access the full write-ups from field is strong interest from farms wanting to convert.
    [Show full text]
  • Causas De Las Crisis Alimentarias En Somalia, Sudán Y Etiopía Entre 1980 Y 2015
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA I TESIS DOCTORAL Causas de las crisis alimentarias en Somalia, Sudán y Etiopía entre 1980 y 2015 MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Francisco Jesús Gómez de Mercado Millán DIRECTOR Jorge Fonseca Castro Madrid, 2018 © Francisco Jesús Gómez de Mercado Millán, 2017 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES Departamento de Economía Aplicada I CAUSAS DE LAS CRISIS ALIMENTARIAS EN SOMALIA, SUDÁN Y ETIOPÍA ENTRE 1980 Y 2015 TESIS DOCTORAL PRESENTADA POR FRANCISCO JESÚS GÓMEZ DE MERCADO MILLÁN BAJO LA DIRECCIÓN DEL DOCTOR JORGE FONSECA CASTRO Madrid, 2017 Causas de las crisis alimentarias en Somalia, Sudán y Etiopía entre 1980 y 2015 Agradecimientos Deseo expresar mi agradecimiento, en primer lugar, a don Jorge Fonseca Castro, director de esta tesis y de la Catedra "Celso Furtado" de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, así como al resto de profesores del Master de Economía Internacional y Desarrollo de la UCM por sus enseñanzas durante todos estos años. 3 Causas de las crisis alimentarias en Somalia, Sudán y Etiopía entre 1980 y 2015 A mi mujer 5 Causas de las crisis alimentarias en Somalia, Sudán y Etiopía entre 1980 y 2015 Resulta tremendamente irónico que la mitad de las personas que pasan hambre en el mundo se dediquen a la agricultura. Devereux, Vaitla y Hauenstein-Swan (2008, 26). 7 Causas de las crisis alimentarias en Somalia, Sudán y Etiopía entre 1980 y 2015 RESUMEN
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Livestock Production and Growth Opportunities in India
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge International Grassland Congress Proceedings XXIII International Grassland Congress Traditional Livestock Production and Growth Opportunities in India S. M. Deb National Research Centre on Yak, India Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc Part of the Plant Sciences Commons, and the Soil Science Commons This document is available at https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/23/keynote/9 The XXIII International Grassland Congress (Sustainable use of Grassland Resources for Forage Production, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection) took place in New Delhi, India from November 20 through November 24, 2015. Proceedings Editors: M. M. Roy, D. R. Malaviya, V. K. Yadav, Tejveer Singh, R. P. Sah, D. Vijay, and A. Radhakrishna Published by Range Management Society of India This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Grassland Congress Proceedings by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Traditional livestock production and growth opportunities in India S. M. Deb ABSTRACT Livestock and animal health development projects need to be based on an understanding of livestock production systems because different systems need different approaches particularly in view of degradation of environment combined with population pressure. In India, the livestock production system is primarily traditional, consisting of mixed- farming and pastoral systems, therefore, development of marginal and smallholder mixed farms must aim at intensification of the total production system. Resource-poor farming systems may aim at the improved management of the various livestock species in backyards.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Farming : Scope and Constraints in West African Savanna
    Mixed Farming :Scop e and Constraints inWes tAfrica n Savanna Promotor: Dr. Ir. H.va nKeule n Hoogleraar bijd eleerstoelgroe p PlantaardigeProductiesysteme n y-f- 'i, Mixed Farming :Scop e and Constraints inWes tAfrica n Savanna Maja Slingerland Proefschrift Terverkrijgin gva nd egraa dva ndocto r opgeza gva nd erecto r magnificus vanWageninge nUniversiteit , dr. CM.Karssen , inhe topenbaa r te verdedigen opvrijda g2 Jun i 2000 desnamiddag st evie r uur ind eAul a ThesisWageninge n University, ISBN 90-5808-242-3 Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences Also published inTropica l Resource Management Papers, No. 34 (2000) ISSN0926-949 5 Thecompletio n ofthi sPh D thesis was financially supported byWageninge n University Cover design:Pie t Kostense &Maj a Slingerland Coverphotos : Maja Slingerland &Georg e Bazie RIB!!'.;': i il;,:K VVACFM\K:r\' 0 ,(JSI,« ° Propositions 1. Only wealthier farmers can and will become mixed farmers. This thesis 2. Resource-poor farmers and semi-nomadic pastoralists must be stimulated to participate in technology development, so that they can influence the research agenda and be co- responsible for development and extension of technologies adressing their specific needs. This thesis 3. You can not sell a cow and drink its milk. A proverb 4. Appropriate credit facilities at farm level are a prerequisite for optimal animal production and undisturbed integration of crop and livestock production on mixed farms. This thesis 5. A cart should be considered more important in mixed farming than a plough. This thesis 6. Mossi crop farmers and Fulani herdmen use different strategies to cope with uncertainties such as unreliable rainfall conditions: Mossi increase control over scarce resources whereas Fulani increase mobility to track changes and find the scarce resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Crop-Livestock Production Systems of Smallholder Farmers in Sub-Humid and Semi-Arid Areas of Zambia J.Cn.Lungu
    MIXED CROP-LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN SUB-HUMID AND SEMI-ARID AREAS OF ZAMBIA J.CN.LUNGU - School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia XA0202202 Abstract MIXED CROP-LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN SUB-HUMID AND SEMI-ARID AREAS OF ZAMBIA. Livestock production activities among small-scale farmers of semi-arid (Agro-ecological zone 1) and sub-humid (Agro-ecological zone 2) areas of Zambia are integrated with crop production activities in what is termed as crop/livestock farming system. This is a closed system in which production of one enterprise depends on the other. In Zambia, crop production depends on draught animals for tillage of cropping area, animal manure for fertilisation of crops while livestock depend on crop residues for dry season feeding. Good quality grass is generally available in adequate amounts to support reasonable level of livestock productivity during the rainy season. But livestock rely on low quantity and poor quality, highly fibrous perennial grass from veld and fibrous crop residues during the dry season. These resources are inadequate to support optimum livestock productivity activities. Poor nutrition results in low rates of reproduction and production as well as increased susceptibility to diseases. With the increasing human population cropping land is expanding, leading to increased production of crop residues. This has however, reduced the grazing land available for ruminant production. In Zambia large quantities of crop residues (stovers, husks and straws, legume tops and hulls, sugar cane tops, cassava leaves, potato vines, etc.) are left in the field where they are wasted each year because small-scale farmers lack the knowledge on how best to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation of Mixed Crop– Livestock Systems in Asia
    Adaptation of Mixed Crop– 10 Livestock Systems in Asia Fujiang Hou State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, China College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, China 10.1 Introduction duction and other components and eco- regions of farming systems, especially Th e mixed farming system combining crop between plant and livestock, fi ve types of and livestock production, which usually is mixed crop–livestock systems have been based on the interaction of arable crops such identifi ed in Asia: farming systems based on as forage crop, grain crop and oil crop, rangeland; farming systems based on grain rangeland, woodland and livestock, is the crops; farming systems based on crop/ dominant agricultural system of the world. pasture rotations; agrosilvopastoral systems; It produces about half of the world’s food and farming systems based on ponds (Fig. (Herrero et al., 2010) and makes the largest 10.1). contribution to the food supply of humans. Th e production system uses 90% of the total cropland, feeds 70% of sheep and goats and 10.2.1 Farming systems based on produces 88.5% of beef, 88% of milk, 61% rangeland of pork and 26% of poultry meat (Seré and Steinfeld, 1996; Blackburn, 1998). Th is type of production system is operated Approximately 84% of the total agricultural in the arid area (annual mean precipitation population is involved in the operation of below 250 mm) of north-west China, central mixed farming systems in developing Asia and west Asia, of which the dominant countries (Blackburn, 1998). As one of the landscape is the Gobi desert; some of the biggest developing areas, the situation in semi-arid area (between 250 mm and Asia is similar (Hou et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Rural Transport Premium in Murang'a County, Kenya
    Measuring the Rural Transport Premium in Murang’a County, Kenya Final Report Tacitus Ltd GEN2185B June 2020 The Developmental Participatory Consultants Preferred citation: Orwa, S., and Oyoo, R. (2020). Measuring the Rural Transport Premium in Kenya: Final Report, GEN2185B. London: ReCAP for DFID. For further information, please contact Samuel Orwa, [email protected] ReCAP Project Management Unit Cardno Emerging Market (UK) Ltd Level 5, Clarendon Business Centre 42 Upper Berkeley Street, Marylebone London W1H 5PW United Kingdom The views in this document are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views of the Research for Community Access Partnership (ReCAP) or Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd for whom the document was prepared Cover photo: Gitugi -Shopping Centre – Picture by Robert Oyoo Quality assurance and review table Version Author(s) Reviewer(s) Date 1.0 Samuel Orwa and Robert Oyoo Annabel Bradbury (ReCAP PMU) 16/06/2020 Joseph Haule (ReCAP PMU 22/06/2020 2.0 Samuel Orwa and Robert Oyoo Annabel Bradbury (ReCAP PMU) 02/07/2020 ReCAP Database Details: Measuring the Rural Transport Premium in Murang’a County, Kenya Reference No: GEN2185B Location Kenya Samuel Orwa Procurement Sole sourced Source of Proposal Method Theme Transport Services Sub-Theme Rural Transport Impact Indicators Lead Tacitus Ltd N/A Partner Implementation Organisation Organisation Total Approved GBP 4,800 GBP 4,800 Total Used Budget Budget Start Date 24 February 2020 End Date 30 June 2020 Report Due Date 15 June 2020 Date Received 15 June 2020 ReCAP | Measuring the Rural Transport Premium in Kenya 3 Table of Contents Abstract .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farming Like We're Here to Stay : the Mixed Farming Alternative for Cuba
    Farming like we’re here to stay The mixed farming alternative for Cuba Promotor: Prof. dr. ir. H. van Keulen Hoogleraar bij de leerstoelgroep Plantaardige Productiesystemen Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotor: Dr. ir. E.A. Lantinga Universitair hoofddocent bij de leerstoelgroep Biologische Landbouwsystemen Wageningen Universiteit Promotiecommissie: Prof. dr. ir. P.C. Struik (Wageningen Universiteit) Dr. ir. J.B. Schiere (La Ventana Consultancy, Bennekom) Dr. ir. J. Daane (ICRA, Wageningen) Dr. J. Wright (HDRA, UK) Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de C.T. de Wit onderzoekschool: Production Ecology and Resource Conservation. Farming like we’re here to stay The mixed farming alternative for Cuba Fernando R. Funes-Monzote Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 14 oktober 2008 des namiddags te 16:00 in de Aula Fernando R. Funes-Monzote (2008) Farming like we’re here to stay: The mixed farming alternative for Cuba Funes-Monzote, F.R. – [S.l.: s.n.]. Ill. PhD thesis Wageningen University. With summaries in English, Dutch and Spanish ISBN: 978-90-8504-979-1 To my mother –in memory– and to my father, for their everlasting example of integrity To Claudia To Diego and Fabio Most of the ideas contained in this thesis are the result of more than ten years of joint research with my mother, Dr. Marta Monzote. I had the pleasure to share with her, in her double role of mother and colleague, the most inspiring moments in my professional career thus far.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa
    Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa Knowledge of Africa’s complex farming systems, set in their socio-economic and environmental context, is an essential ingredient to developing effective strategies for improving food and nutrition security. This book systematically and comprehensively describes the characteristics, trends, drivers of change and strategic priorities for each of Africa’s fifteen farming systems and their main subsystems. It shows how a farming systems perspective can be used to identify pathways to household food security and pov- erty reduction, and how strategic interventions may need to differ from one farming system to another. In the analysis, emphasis is placed on understanding farming systems drivers of change, trends and stra- tegic priorities for science and policy. Illustrated with full-colour maps and photographs throughout, the volume provides a comprehen- sive and insightful analysis of Africa’s farming systems and pathways for the future to improve food and nutrition security. The book is an essential follow-up to the seminal work Farming Systems and Poverty by Dixon and colleagues for the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and the World Bank, published in 2001. John Dixon is Principal Adviser Research & Program Manager, Cropping Systems and Economics, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, Australia. Dennis Garrity is Senior Fellow at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), based in Nairobi, Kenya, UNCCD Drylands Ambassador, and Chair of the EverGreen Agriculture Partnership. Jean-Marc Boffa is Director of Terra Sana Projects and Associate Fellow of the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya. Timothy Olalekan Williams is Regional Director for Africa at the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), based in Accra, Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • High Nature Value Farmland in Wales: East Carmarthenshire Case Study Report
    High Nature Value Farmland in Wales: East Carmarthenshire Case Study Report Gwyn Jones; Candace Browne; Rosie Carmichael & Deborah Sazer Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 Crynodeb ................................................................................................................................................. 8 1. The HNV farming concept and EU policy ...................................................................................... 10 2. Situation in Wales ......................................................................................................................... 13 3. Objectives of this project .............................................................................................................. 17 4. What types of farmland in East Carmarthenshire can be classed as HNV? .................................. 18 4.1 Landscape character of the study area ................................................................................. 18 4.2. Farming systems in East Carmarthenshire ............................................................................ 19 4.3. LBAP
    [Show full text]