OtaniemiOtaniemi –– aa FinnishFinnish TechnologyTechnology HubHub
Nils Gersberg Helsinki University of Technology Construction Economics and Management Facility Services Research http://cem.tkk.fi/fsr [email protected] 2 AgendaAgenda
Finland in brief
Finnish educational system
Quality criteria for learning environments
Otaniemi area
Conclusions 3 FinlandFinland 4 FinlandFinland inin briefbrief
Population 5.2 million 67% live in urban , 33% rural areas
Surface area 338,000 km² of which 10% is water and 69% forest; 187,888 lakes, 5,100 rapids and 179,584 islands
Official languages Finnish (92%) and Swedish (6%), the Sami language in the Sami domicile in Lapland
Religion Lutheran (85%), Orthodox (1%), unaffiliated (13%) 5 FinlandFinland inin briefbrief (2)(2)
GDP 2005 155.3 billion € 29,612 € per capita
Competitiveness rating
World Economic Forum 1st place 2005 (3rd consecutive year)
Human Development Index
UNDP 13th place 2005
OECD PISA survey top places in 2000 & 2003 6 TheThe FinnishFinnish educationeducation systemsystem 7 TheThe FinnishFinnish educationeducation systemsystem (2)(2)
Constructive learning philosophy:
focuses on students’ willingness and ability to search for knowledge through dialogues with each other and their teachers 8 EducationEducation inin briefbrief
The total education budget as a share of total public expenditure is 11.9 %
Number of students and educational institutions
Students Institutions
Basic education 596,000 3,953 General upper secondary education 129,000 441 Vocational upper secondary education and training 160,000 290
Polytechnics 118,000 31
Universities 163,000 20 QualityQuality criteriacriteria forfor learninglearning environmentsenvironments QualityQuality criteriacriteria forfor learninglearning 10 environmentsenvironments¹¹
1) Flexible environment
Connective
Multifunctional
Alternative ways to use building
Easy to move 2) Encourages learning
Motivating environment
Promotes sustainability
Provides model of working environment 3) Multidimensional centre for multiple usage
Takes into account needs of surrounding community
Multipurpose building for all
For all ages
¹Nuikkinen, K. (2005) Terveellinen ja turvallinen koulurakennus, Opetushallitus, Saarijärvi, Finland. QualityQuality criteriacriteria forfor learninglearning 11 environmentsenvironments (2)(2)
4) Challenging
Environmental message is in importance of co- operation, not in bureaucratic institution and artefacts 5) Supports interaction
How people meet each other
Traffic junctions and meeting places 6) School for everyone
Accessibility
Individual privacy
Openness - no need for control - safety 7) Aesthetical
Body and sense experience
Self regulation
Comfortable, healthy QualityQuality criteriacriteria forfor learninglearning 12 environmentsenvironments (3)(3)
8) Supports the identity
Message about organisation, expected behaviour OtaniemiOtaniemi areaarea 14 OtaniemiOtaniemi areaarea 15 RelevanceRelevance ofof thethe areaarea
Community of about 25,000 people
15,000 students
10,000 professionals
300+ companies
60 to 80 new businesses founded each year
over 500 new business ideas invented each year
over 200 patents each year 16 MainMain PlayersPlayers
TKK – Teknillinen korkeakoulu (Helsinki University of Technology)
Dipoli
VTT - Technical Research Centre of Finland
Technopolis (I + II + Technopolis Ventures)
KCL - Paper & pulb research
GTK - Geological survey of Finland 17 TKKTKK OtaniemiOtaniemi
TKK Otaniemi
Campus university
12 engineering departments
~15,000 students
~3,000 employees (200 professors)
~130 PhD's per year
~1000 degrees per year
Student village