DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 51/Monday, March 16, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 51/Monday, March 16, 2020 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules 14847 October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, Dated: March 2, 2020. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, January 21, 2011); John W. Busterud, identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 Regional Administrator, Region IX. OAR–2015–0189, at http:// FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory [FR Doc. 2020–05331 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov or via email to _ action because SIP approvals are BILLING CODE 6560–50–P R6AIR [email protected]. Follow the exempted under Executive Order 12866; online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments • Does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION cannot be edited or removed from collection burden under the provisions AGENCY Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 any comment received to its public U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 40 CFR Part 52 docket. Do not submit any information • Is certified as not having a [EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0189; FRL–10006– electronically that is considered to be significant economic impact on a 02–Region 6] Confidential Business Information (CBI) substantial number of small entities or other information whose disclosure is under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Air Plan Approval; Arkansas; Arkansas restricted by statute. Multimedia U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Regional Haze and Visibility Transport submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be • Does not contain any unfunded State Implementation Plan Revisions accompanied by a written comment. mandate or significantly or uniquely and Withdrawal of Federal The written comment is considered the affect small governments, as described Implementation Plan official comment with multimedia in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection submissions and should include all of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA). discussion points desired. The EPA will generally not consider comments or • Does not have federalism ACTION: Proposed rule. implications as specified in Executive their contents located outside of the Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act primary submission (i.e., on the web, 1999); (CAA or the Act), the Environmental cloud, or other file sharing systems). For Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to additional submission methods, please • Is not an economically significant approve a revision to the Arkansas State contact James E. Grady, (214) 665–6745, regulatory action based on health or Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by [email protected]. For the full EPA safety risks subject to Executive Order the State of Arkansas through the public comment policy, information 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Arkansas Division of Environmental about CBI or multimedia submissions, • Is not a significant regulatory action Quality (ADEQ) on August 13, 2019. and general guidance on making subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR The SIP submittal addresses effective comments, please visit https:// 28355, May 22, 2001); requirements of the Act and the www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa- • Is not subject to requirements of Regional Haze Rule for visibility dockets. Section 12(d) of the National protection in mandatory Class I Federal Docket: The index to the docket for Technology Transfer and Advancement areas (Class I areas) for the first this action is available electronically at Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because implementation period. The EPA is www.regulations.gov and in hard copy application of those requirements would proposing to approve an alternative at the EPA Region 6, 1201 Elm Street, be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; measure to best available retrofit Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270–2102. and technology (BART) for sulfur dioxide While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information • Does not provide the EPA with the (SO2), particulate matter (PM), and may be publicly available only at the discretionary authority to address nitrogen oxide (NOX) at the Domtar hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted disproportionate human health or Ashdown Mill and elements of the SIP material), and some may not be publicly environmental effects with practical, submittal that relate to these BART available at either location (e.g., CBI). appropriate, and legally permissible requirements at this facility. In addition, methods under Executive Order 12898 we are proposing to approve the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). withdrawal from the SIP the previously James E. Grady, EPA Region 6 Office, approved PM10 BART limit and the Regional Haze and SO2 Section, 1201 In addition, the SIP is not approved federal implementation plan (FIP) Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX 72570, to apply on any Indian reservation land provisions for the Domtar Ashdown 214–665–6745; [email protected]. or in any other area where the EPA or Mill. The EPA is also concurrently To inspect the hard copy materials, an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a proposing to approve Arkansas’ please schedule an appointment with tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of interstate visibility transport provisions Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665– Indian country, the rule does not have from the August 10, 2018, regional haze 7253. tribal implications and will not impose SIP submittal as supplemented by the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: substantial direct costs on tribal visibility transport provisions in the Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ governments or preempt tribal law as October 4, 2019, interstate transport SIP or ‘‘our’’ mean ‘‘the EPA.’’ specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 submittal, which covers the following FR 67249, November 9, 2000). national ambient air quality standards Table of Contents List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 (NAAQS): The 2006 24-hour fine I. Background particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS; the A. Regional Haze Principles Environmental protection, Air 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS; the 2008 B. Requirements of the CAA and the EPA’s Regional Haze Rule pollution control, Incorporation by and 2015 eight-hour ozone (O3) NAAQS; reference, Intergovernmental relations, the 2010 one-hour nitrogen dioxide C. BART Requirements D. BART Alternative Requirements Ozone, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and (NO2) NAAQS; and the 2010 one-hour recordkeeping requirements, Volatile E. Long-Term Strategy and Reasonable SO2 NAAQS. Progress Requirements organic compounds. DATES: Written comments must be F. Previous Actions on Arkansas Regional Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. received on or before April 15, 2020. Haze VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Mar 13, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS 14848 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules G. Arkansas Regional Haze Phase III SIP Fine particulates which cause haze are that would exist under estimated 2¥ ¥ 5 Submittal sulfates (SO4 ), nitrates (NO3 ), natural conditions. In most of the H. Arkansas Visibility Transport organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon eastern Class I areas of the United II. Evaluation of the Arkansas Regional Haze (EC), and soil dust.2 PM precursors States, the average visual range was less Phase III SIP Submittal 2.5 A. Summary of Arkansas’ BART consist of SO2, NOX, volatile organic than 30 km, or about one-fifth of the Alternative for Domtar Ashdown Mill compounds (VOCs), and in some cases, visual range that would exist under B. Demonstration That BART Alternative ammonia (NH3). Airborne PM2.5 can estimated natural conditions. Since the Achieves Greater Reasonable Progress scatter and absorb the incident light promulgation of the original Regional 1. List All BART-Eligible Sources Within and, therefore, lead to atmospheric Haze Rule in 1999, CAA programs have the State opacity and horizontal visibility reduced emissions of haze-causing 2. List All BART-Eligible Sources and degradation. Regional haze limits visual pollution, lessening visibility Source Categories Covered by the distance and reduces color, clarity, and impairment and resulting in improved Alternative Program contrast of view. PM can cause serious 6 3. Analysis of BART and Associated 2.5 average visual ranges. Emission Reductions adverse health effects and mortality in humans. It also contributes to B. Requirements of the CAA and the 4. Analysis of Projected Emission EPA’s Regional Haze Rule Reductions Achievable Through BART environmental effects such as acid Alternative deposition and eutrophication. In section 169A, enacted as part of the 5. Determination That Alternative Emissions that affect visibility include a 1977 CAA Amendments, Congress Achieves Greater Reasonable Progress wide variety of natural and man-made created a program for protecting than BART sources. Natural sources can include visibility in the nation’s national parks C. Requirement That Emission Reductions windblown dust and soot from and wilderness areas. This section of the Take Place During the Period of the First CAA establishes as a national goal the Long-Term Strategy wildfires. Man-made sources can D. Demonstration That Emission include major and minor stationary prevention of any future, and the Reductions From Alternative Measure sources, mobile sources, and area remedying of any existing, visibility Will Be Surplus sources. Reducing PM2.5 and its impairment in mandatory Class I E. Implementation of the BART Alternative precursor gases in the atmosphere is an Federal areas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Basecamp for Mountain Adventures
    SPRING SUMMER BASECAMP FOR MOUNTAIN ADVENTURES FALL WINTER MENA ADVERTISING & PROMOTION COMMISSION WWW.VISITMENA.COM 479 ∙ 394 ∙ 8355 IN ANY SEASON WWW.VISITMENA.COM Great outdoors will take on a whole new meaning when you step into our back yard! Hello... this is Lum & Abner. We want you to know that the Lum & Abner Festival is the first weekend in June in Mena at Janssen Park! The event is free and folks get to enjoy live music both nights. There are always all kinds of arts & handcrafted items provided by locals and folks from all around. it always smells good at the lum & abner festival cause of all the tasty food being cooked up by vendors. Lots of other entertainment is happening too. Baby crawling contests, eating contests, fun things for the kiddies, a car show, basketball tournament, and even a 5K run. bring some friends & neighbors. Bring Grandpa, Grandma, cousins, aunts, and uncles. Why... you might even want to bring your mother-in-law. For more information Talimena National Scenic Byway go to www.visitmena.com or call 479-394-8355 Aubrey D. Tapley Park Table of Contents This sports complex is a 74 acre park which was started by Welcome to the Mena Advertising and Promotion Commission in 2003. It was named Aubrey D. Tapley Park in 2009. It currently houses 5 baseball/softball fields, soccer fields, concession The Ouachita Mountains! facilities including a pavilion, and two playgrounds. The complex is the venue for community events such as the Attractions.............................3-8 Annual 4th of July Celebration and multiple baseball/ softball and soccer tournaments each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Rock Loop Trail Recreational Trail the Ground
    It’s a simple thing, really: a well-trod path through a place otherwise untouched, a scraggly aisle cut through a sun-dappled canopy. It’s rudimental and practical. It’s a way through. But as the eight routes featured in these pages prove, an Arkansas hiking trail can be far, far more than just a means to an end Edited by Wyndham Wyeth 60 ARKANSAS LIFE www.arkansaslife.com OCTOBER 2016 ARKANSAS LIFE 61 R. Kenny Vernon 64 Nature Trail 76 Ouachita National “Stand absolutely still and study Eagle Rock Loop Trail Recreational Trail the ground. Look for the clusters of acorns the blackjack oak has tossed aside; the horn of plenty ’VE ALWAYS BEEN OF THE MIND THAT those may live nearby.” who talk down about Arkansas have never actually set foot in the state. Surely, those folks have never been fortunate enough to see the unyielding natural beauty that abounds in this neck of the woods we call home. When it comes to the great outdoors, the variety found in The Natural State is inexhaustible. From the IBuffalo, the country’s first national river, to our state’s highest peak on Mount Magazine, and all manner of flora and fauna in between, the call of the Arkansas wild is difficult to resist. 70 But if you want to discuss Arkansas and its eminence in all things outside, you’d be remiss if you failed to address the hiking trails, Mount Nebo Bench Trail those hand-cut paths through terrain both savage and tamed that represent Arkansas in its purest form.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G - Roadless Area/Wilderness Evaluations and Wild and Scenic Rivers
    Appendix G - Roadless Area/Wilderness Evaluations and Wild and Scenic Rivers In accordance with 36 CFR 219.17, a new inventory of roadless areas was completed for this plan revision, and areas of the Ouachita National Forest that met the criteria for inclusion in the roadless area inventory (Chapter 7 of Forest Service Handbook 1909.12) were further evaluated for recommendation as potential wilderness areas. The reinventory of roadless areas included previously recognized roadless areas considered during development of the 1986 Forest Plan and the 1990 Amended Forest Plan. These areas were: Beech Creek, Rich Mountain, Blue Mountain, Brush Heap, Bear Mountain, and Little Blakely. Also, two areas near Broken Bow Lake in Southeastern Oklahoma, Bee Mountain and Ashford Peak, were identified in the January 2002 FEIS for Acquired Lands in Southeastern Oklahoma. Possible additions to existing wilderness areas were also considered. The roadless inventory for the Ouachita National Forest was updated for this iteration of plan revision using Geographic Information System (GIS) technology. Evaluation of the Forest for areas meeting the criterion of one-half mile of improved [National Forest System] road or less per 1,000 acres yielded a significant number of candidate polygons and all polygons over 1,000 acres in size were considered to determine if there were any possibility of expanding the area to a suitable size to warrant consideration as possible wilderness. Polygons meeting the initial criteria were further analyzed using criteria found in FSH 1909.12 (Chapter 7.11) to produce the inventoried roadless areas described in this appendix. The planning team determined that, of the former RARE II areas, the only ones that meet the criteria for inclusion in the roadless area inventory are portions of Blue Mountain and Brush Heap.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • 1975/01/03 S3433 Eastern Wilderness” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 20, folder “1975/01/03 S3433 Eastern Wilderness” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 20 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ACTION THE WHITE HOUSE Last Day: January 4 WASHINGTON s January 2, 1975 I lot ?b ~ . () ,, , 5 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ~ESiiNT FROM: KEN~ SUBJECT: Enrolled Bill S. 3433 Eastern Wilderness Attached for your consideration is S. 3433, sponsored by Senator Aiken and 21 others, which designates 16 National Forest wilderness areas as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System. In addition, 17 National Forest areas would be studied as to their suitability or non-suitability for preservation as wilderness, and the President would be required to make his recommendations to Congress within five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas
    ~ f./ , STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS · I Mineral Resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas By GEORGE E. ERICKSEN and SAM H. PATTERSON U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY and by MAYNARD L. DUNN, JR., and DONALD K. HARRISON, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS- WILDERNESS AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1551 An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1988 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Mineral resources of the Caney Creek Wilderness, Polk County, Arkansas. (Geological Survey bulletin; 1551) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1551 1. Mines and mineral resources-Arkansas-Caney Creek Wilderness. 2. Caney Creek Wilderness (Ark.) I. Ericksen, George Edward. II. Series. QU75.B9 no. 1551 557.3s [553'.09767'45] 83-8868 [TN 24.A7] For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS AREAS In accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Con­ ference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines have been con- · ducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Studies and reports of all primitive areas have been com­ pleted. Areas officially designated as uwilderness, .. uwild," or ucanoe" when the Act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Wolf Pen Gap Project March 2014
    Environmental Assessment For Wolf Pen Gap Project March 2014 Responsible Agency: US Forest Service, Ouachita National Forest Mena and Oden Ranger Districts Responsible Official: Tim Oosterhous, District Ranger 1603 Highway 71 North Mena, AR 71953 For Further Information Contact: Bill Pell, Planning and Recreation Staff Officer 501-321-5202 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Implementation Plan Review for the Five-Year Regional Haze Progress Report
    STATE OF ARKANSAS State Implementation Plan Review for the Five- Year Regional Haze Progress Report Prepared by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Air Division Planning Branch Revised May 2015 Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, Arkansas 72118-5317 Contents Governor’s Letter ............................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 11 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Federal Regional Haze Program Requirements ....................... 13 1. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Regional Planning ............................................................................................................................. 13 3. Requirements for Periodic Reports Describing Progress towards Reasonable Progress Goals ........ 15 Chapter 2: Progress
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–388 WILD OLYMPICS WILDERNESS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT FEBRUARY 4, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. GRIJALVA, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 2642] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 2642) to designate and expand wilderness areas in Olym- pic National Forest in the State of Washington, and to designate certain rivers in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park as wild and scenic rivers, and for other purposes, having con- sidered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Riv- ers Act’’. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS AREAS. (a) IN GENERAL.—In furtherance of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following Federal land in the Olympic National Forest in the State of Wash- ington comprising approximately 126,554 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’ and dated April 8, 2019 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘map’’), is designated as wil- derness and as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) LOST CREEK WILDERNESS.—Certain Federal land managed by the Forest Service, comprising approximately 7,159 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be known as the ‘‘Lost Creek Wilderness’’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]