Global Training Network Flightsafety Provides Factory-Authorized Training at Convenient Locations in Our Worldwide Learning Center Network
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2020 Annual Noise Contour Report
Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Comparison of the 2020 Actual and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contours February 2021 MAC Community Relations Office and HNTB Corporation MSP 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Table of Contents ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 AIRPORT NOISE LITIGATION AND CONSENT DECREE .............................................................. 1 ES.3 MSP 2020 IMPROVEMENTS EA/EAW ..................................................................................... 2 ES.4 THE AMENDED CONSENT DECREE ......................................................................................... 2 ES.5 2020 NOISE CONTOURS ......................................................................................................... 3 ES.6 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ............................................................. 3 ES.7 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM MITIGATION STATUS ............................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 8 1.1 CORRECTIVE LAND USE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS AIRCRAFT NOISE ............................................ 8 1.2 2007 FORECAST CONTOUR ................................................................................................. -
Could Uavs Improve New Zealand's Maritime Security?
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Could UAVs improve New Zealand’s Maritime Security? 149.800 Master of Philosophy Thesis Massey University Centre for Defence Studies Supervisor: Dr John Moremon By: Brian Oliver Due date: 28 Feb 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................... iv Glossary .................................................................................................. v Abstract ................................................................................................ viii Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: New Zealand's Maritime Environment ................................. 6 The Political Backdrop .................................................................... 10 Findings of the Maritime Patrol Review .......................................... 12 Maritime Forces Review ................................................................. 18 The current state of maritime surveillance ..................................... 19 The National Maritime Coordination Centre ................................... 23 Chapter 2: The Value of New Zealand's Maritime Environment ......... 29 Oil and gas production in New Zealand ........................................ -
79952 Federal Register / Vol
79952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Unsafe Condition DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, (d) This AD was prompted by an accident Washington 98057–3356; telephone and the subsequent discovery of cracks in the Federal Aviation Administration (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. main rotor blade (blade) spars. We are issuing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 39 this AD to prevent blade failure and Discussion subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. [Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate We issued a supplemental notice of Compliance Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD; Amendment 39–16544; AD 2010–26–05] proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend (e) Before further flight, unless already 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that done: RIN 2120–AA64 would apply to the specified products. (1) Revise the Limitations section of the That supplemental NPRM was Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by published in the Federal Register on AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours time- July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43878). That Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET in-service (TIS) for each blade set Remove supplemental NPRM proposed to FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G each blade set with 8,000 or more hours TIS. correct an unsafe condition for the Airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON (2) Replace each specified serial-numbered specified products. The MCAI states: 200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE- blade set with an airworthy blade set in During maintenance on one aircraft, it was accordance with the following table: FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20– F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves. -
Chapter Three, Part 2
The FAA's substitution list recommends conditions at Georgetown Municipal the BEC58P, the Beech Baron, to Airport. (Measured single event noise represent the light twin-engine aircraft information is for comparative purposes such as the Piper Navajo, Beech Duke, only and cannot be used as input into Cessna 31, and others. The CNA441 the INM.) Both the loudest sound levels effectively represents the light (Lmax) and the Sound Exposure Levels turboprop and twin-engine piston (SEL) for various aircraft types were aircraft such as the King Air, Cessna recorded during the noise measurement 402, Gulfstream Commander, and program at each noise monitoring site. others. A detailed INM grid point analysis can then be prepared that generates Lmax The INM provides data for most of the and SEL values for the corresponding business turbojet aircraft in the aircraft types at each noise monitoring national fleet. The MU3001 effectively site for comparison. The resulting represents the Cessna Citation I, II and measured and predicated Lmax and V series aircraft. The CIT3 represents SEL values can then be compared. the Cessna Citation III, IV, and VII series aircraft. The GlIB designator Table 3E depicts the range of measured represents the Gulfstream II and III Lmax and SEL values from monitor series aircraft. The LEAR35 effectively sites one and three and the predicted represents the Lear 30 and 50 series, Lmax and SEL values from the INM for the Sabreliner 65, the Falcon 10, 50, these sites. (Monitor sites one and three and 200, and the Hawker 700 and 800 were used because they received the series aircraft. -
DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes
43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules Applicability New Requirements of This AD: Actions Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. (h) Within 30 months after the effective 2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated date of this AD, do the actions specified in 27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related in any category, all serial numbers. paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD information. concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, Subject both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 2010. (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of terminates the actions required by paragraph Jeffrey E. Duven, America Code 27: Flight Controls. (g) of this AD. (1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Reason 9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (e) The mandatory continuing stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the [FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Two reports have been received where, Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 27, 2009. F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts (2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION that connect the horizontal stabilizer control of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and unit actuator with the dog-links was found install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance Federal Aviation Administration broken (one on the nut side & one on the with the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, head side). -
Technical Addendum to the Guidance for Noise Screening of Air Traffic Actions
MP130001 MITRE PRODUCT Technical Addendum to the Guidance for Noise Screening of Air Traffic Actions Koffi A. Amefia February 2013 The contents of this material reflect the views of the author and/or the Director of the Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD), and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the Department of Transportation (DOT). Neither the FAA nor the DOT makes any warranty or guarantee, or promise, expressed or implied, concerning the content or accuracy of the views expressed herein. This is the copyright work of The MITRE Corporation and was produced for the U.S. Government under Contract Number DTFAWA-10-C-00080 and is subject to Federal Aviation Administration Acquisition Management System Clause 3.5-13, Rights in Data-General, Alt. III and Alt. IV (Oct. 1996). No other use other than that granted to the U.S. Government, or to those acting on behalf of the U.S. Government, under that Clause is authorized without the express written permission of The MITRE Corporation. For further information, please contact The MITRE Corporation, Contract Office, 7515 Colshire Drive, McLean, VA 22102 (703) 983-6000. 2013 The MITRE Corporation. The Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this document, or to allow others to do so, for “Government Purposes Only.” MP130001 MITRE PRODUCT Technical Addendum to the Guidance for Noise Screening of Air Traffic Actions Sponsor: The Federal Aviation Administration Koffi A. Amefia Dept. No.: F072 Project No.: 0213BB03-2B Outcome No.: 3 PBWP Reference: 3-2.1-2 February 2013 “Wind Farm and Environmental Assessment Processes” For Release to all FAA This document was prepared for authorized distribution only. -
ATP® Libraries Catalog
2 ATP® Libraries Catalog Revision Date May 24 2016 ATP 101 South Hill Drive Brisbane, CA 94005 (+1) 415-330-9500 www.atp.com ATP® Policies and Legal www.atp.com/policy © Copyright 2016, ATP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of ATP. The information in this catalog is subject to change without notice.ATP, ATP Knowledge, ATP Aviation Hub, HubConnect, NavigatorV, and their respective logos, are among the registered trademarks or trademarks of ATP. All third-party trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners and ATP asserts no ownership rights to these items. iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. All original authorship of ATP is protected under U.S. and foreign copyrights and is subject to written license agreements between ATP and its subscribers. Visit www.atp.com/policy for more information ATP Customer Support Please visit www.atp.com/support for customer support information ATP® Libraries Catalog – Revision Date: May 24 2016 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY LIBRARIES ............................................................................................................................................. -
Planning Horizons
3 F R To properly plan for the future of Coolidge facilities will be evaluated in Chapter Four Municipal Airport, it is necessary to trans- to determine the most cost-effective and late forecast aviation demand into the efficient means for implementation. specific types and quantities of facilities that can adequately serve this identified demand. This chapter uses the results of the PLANNING HORIZONS forecasts conducted in Chapter Two, as well as established planning criteria, to The cost-effective, efficient, and orderly determine the airside (i.e., runways, development of an airport should rely more taxiways, navigational aids, marking and upon actual demand at an airport than on a lighting) and landside (i.e., terminal build- time-based forecast figure. In order to ing, hangars, aircraft parking apron, and develop a Master Plan that is demand-based automobile parking) facility requirements. rather than time-based, a series of planning horizon milestones have been established The objective of this effort is to identify, in for Coolidge Municipal Airport that take general terms, the adequacy of the existing into consideration the reasonable range of airport facilities, outline what new facilities aviation demand projections prepared in the may be needed, and when these may be previous chapter. needed to accommodate forecast demands. Having established these facility require- ments, alternatives for providing these 3-1 It is important to consider that the ac- airport to develop facilities according tual activity at the airport may be to need generated by actual demand higher or lower than projected activity levels. The demand-based schedule levels. By planning according to activ- provides flexibility in development, as ity milestones, the resulting plan can development schedules can be slowed accommodate unexpected shifts, or or expedited according to actual de- changes, in the area’s aviation de- mand at any given time during the mand. -
Griffiss Airport Business Plan.Pdf
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................1 1.1 Vision and Key Issues..............................................1 1.2 Desired End Products ...............................................3 1.3 Report Outline ....................................................4 SECTION 2: AIRPORT MISSION AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE ............5 2.1 Airport Mission ...................................................5 2.2 Airport Management Structure .......................................6 2.3 Other Participating Agencies.........................................8 SECTION 3: EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS ........................10 3.1 Introduction .....................................................10 3.2 Existing Aviation Activity..........................................18 3.3 Existing Facilities ................................................18 3.4 Existing Tenants and Users.........................................22 3.5 Airport Development Plan..........................................25 3.6 Market Analysis..................................................34 SECTION 4: BASELINE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK ..............................41 4.1 Historical Revenues and Expenses ...................................41 4.2 Baseline Forecast of Revenues and Expenses ...........................42 SECTION 5: BUSINESS PLAN ALTERNATIVES ...............................45 5.1 Area-wide Factors Supporting Growth and Development of the Airport ......45 5.2 Obstacles to Airport Performance and Goal Attainment...................50 -
2017 SUN Baseline Noise Modeling Memo
To: CHRIS POMEROY, FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT From: Chris Sandfoss Cc: Rob Adams Date: 3/1/2017 Re: SUN Noise Modeling Methodology and Preliminary Results This memo summarizes the basic input data for, and the preliminary results of, the noise modeling of existing (2017) baseline conditions at Friedman Memorial Airport (SUN). Noise contours have been be prepared using the AEDT at levels of DNL 65, 70, and 75. The following sections describe the input data and results of the noise contour modeling. NOISE MODELING METHODOLOGY Number of Operations and Fleet Mix: The number of annual operations that were modeled for the existing (2017) conditions at SUN is based on a variety of sources, including ATCT operations counts, Airport landing fee reports, and FAA Aviation System Performance Metrics (ASPM) databases. There were 25,316 total operations at SUN from January 2016 through December 2016, which corresponds to 69.4 average-annual day operations. Table 1 provides a summary of the average daily operations and fleet mix at SUN, organized by aircraft type, operation type, and time of day. Several aircraft types use the same FAA-approved substitute in the noise database of the AEDT as indicated by the noise model ID in Table 1. Daytime/Nighttime Operations: Data on the ratio of daytime to nighttime operations is based on data from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and data from FMAA staff. Approximately 98 percent of all operations occur during the daytime (7:00 am to 9:59 pm) and 2 percent of all operations occur during the nighttime (10:00 pm to 6:59 am). -
Joe Foss Field Airport Master Plan
Sioux Falls Regional Airport Joe Foss Field Airport Master Plan Sioux Falls Regional Airport Authority SIOUX FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT Joe Foss Field Sioux Falls, South Dakota DRAFT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Prepared By Coffman Associates Airport Consultants December 2006 AThe contents of these documents reflect the views of Coffman Associates, Inc., which is responsible for the parts and accuracy of the data contained herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of these documents by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted herein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with Public Laws 90-495, 91-190, 91-258, 94-343, and/or 100-223.@ Sioux Falls Regional Airport Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS SIOUX FALLS REGIONAL AIRPORT Sioux Falls, South Dakota Airport Master Plan Update PREFACE Chapter One INVENTORY REGIONAL SETTING..................................................................................... 1-1 Infrastructure........................................................................................ 1-2 Climate .................................................................................................. 1-2 Utilities.................................................................................................. 1-3 AIRPORT SYSTEM PLANNING ROLE......................................................... 1-4 AIRPORT HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION........................................... -
Textron: Action & Results
130124 5/14/03 2:16 PM Page FC1 Textron: Action & Results 2002 Fact Book 130124 5/14/03 2:16 PM Page IFC2 Textron is an $11 billion multi-industry company with approximately 49,000 employees in 40 countries. We leverage our global network of businesses to provide customers with innovative solutions and services in industries such as aircraft, fastening systems, industrial products and components, and finance. Textron is known around the world for its powerful brands, such as Bell Helicopter, Cessna Aircraft, Kautex, Lycoming, E-Z-GO and Greenlee, among others. Stock and Contact Information Stock Exchange Listings General Information Ticker Symbol – TXT This Fact Book is one of several sources of information available to Textron Inc. shareholders and the investment community. To receive Annual Common Stock Reports, 10-K, 10-Q reports and/or press releases, please call (888) TXT- New York, Chicago and Pacific Stock Exchanges LINE or visit our website at www.textron.com Preferred Stock ($2.08 and $1.40) New York Stock Exchange Contacts Investors Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trust (7.92%) Douglas R. Wilburne New York Stock Exchange Vice President, Communications & Investor Relations [email protected] Capital Stock (401) 457-2353 (as of December 28, 2002) (401) 457-3598 (fax) Common stock: par value $0.125; 500,000,000 shares authorized; Marc Kaplan 136,499,608 shares outstanding. Director, Investor Relations $2.08 Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, Series A: [email protected] 120,515 shares outstanding. (401) 457-2502 (401) 457-3598 (fax) $1.40 Convertible Preferred Dividend stock, Series B: 56,394 shares outstanding.