DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOTICE OF HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Submissions on the Draft Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-2015 will be received, and submitters who have indicated a wish to appear in support of their submission have been scheduled to be heard, as follows: Date: Monday, 16 April 2012 Time: 9.00 am Tuesday, 17 April 2012 9.00 am Friday, 20 April 2012 9.00 am Monday, 23 April 2012 9.00 am Tuesday, 24 April 2012 9.00 am Venue: The Chamber Level 2, Auckland Transport 6 Henderson Valley Road Henderson, Auckland HEARING PANEL MEMBERS Chairperson Mr Rabin Rabindran Dr Ian Parton Mr Mike Williams Cr Christine Fletcher Stuart McDougall REGIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME MANAGER Contact Name: Mr Ray Day Contact Telephone: (DDI) 09 440 7297 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandtransport.govt.nz Note: The Agenda Report accompanying this Notice of Hearing is for consideration and is not be construed as a decision of Auckland Transport. AGENDA FOR A HEARING OF THE AUCKLAND TRANSPORT HEARING PANEL, TO BE HELD IN THE CHAMBER LEVEL TWO, 6 HENDERSON VALLEY ROAD, HENDERSON, AUCKLAND ON MONDAY, 16 APRIL 2012 COMMENCING AT 9.00 AM 1. DRAFT AUCKLAND REGIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME: HEARINGS REPORT Introduction Submissions on the Draft 2012-2015 Auckland Land Transport Programme (RLTP) closed on 23 March 2012. A total of 930 submissions were received. In addition, approximately 1,600 submissions were received on the transport section of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (LTP). Some of these submissions relate to matters that are relevant to the RLTP. 156 submitters have indicated a wish to speak to their submissions at the RLTP Hearings, which have been set down for five days, commencing on Monday, 16 April 2012. The Hearings schedule is attached at pages 48 to 52. This report summarises the main points raised by the submitters that are due to appear at the hearings, in the order of appearance Copies of the written submissions from all submitters, including those that wish to be heard, are provided under separate cover. A further report summarising the issues raised by all submitters and officers‟ initial responses to the matters raised is currently under preparation. This report will be available prior to the Hearings Committee deliberations at the conclusion of the hearings. The responses and any recommended changes to the Draft RLTP will be finalised after the hearings, and form the basis of a report on submissions to the Auckland Transport Board. Regional Land Transport Programme Submissions: Key Themes This paper sets out some of the key themes that have emerged in submissions to the Draft Regional Land Transport Programme (RLTP). Over 900 submissions were received in total. A more detailed paper summarising the submissions and recommended responses is under preparation. Some submitters were concerned at a lack of alignment between the RLTP, the Auckland Plan and the LTP. This appears to be at two levels: Funding allocations (in both the LTP and RLTP) that do not reflect the transformational shifts and targets identified as priorities in the Auckland Plan. This is particularly the case in relation to what some submitters saw as a “business as usual” approach to PT and walking and cycling funding. Notwithstanding the draft RLTP‟s support for the CRL, rail electrification, integrated ticketing and other PT infrastructure projects, a number of submitters considered the Hearing Draft Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-2015 amount of funds allocated to PT (especially operating expenditure) to be insufficient to achieve the shift in patronage envisaged in the Auckland Plan. The allocation for walking and cycling infrastructure was also criticised by a large number of submitters as being insufficient to achieve the increases in the use of active modes. Several criticised the adherence to the Ministry of Transport‟s 0.8% budget guideline, and noted that this did not enable walking and cycling investments needed to reflect the ambitions for Auckland to become the world‟s most liveable city. 169 submitters commented on walking and cycling, most calling for a higher level of expenditure. At a more detailed level, some submitters identified lack of alignment between the funding allocations and timing of specific projects in the LTP and RLTP, and signalled the potential for the spending of AT, the Council and other agencies to be better aligned. Strong support was expressed from submitters for the “one network” approach. A large number of submitters called for the priority for specific projects to be increased; or for additional projects to be included in the RLTP. In some cases (but by no means all), this was accompanied by suggestions for projects that should have a correspondingly lower priority. Local boards want to see a greater amount of detail on the projects proposed in their areas. They are unclear on the extent to which local board plans have been reflected in the RLTP funding allocations. They also seek more detail on the level of subsidised and unsubsidised work in their areas. Responses to the major projects listed in section 5.1 of the Draft RLTP were as follows: Rail electrification (49 submissions): most of the submitters on this subject were supportive of the funding allocation to electrification. Some support was noted for extension of electrification to Pukekohe at an early stage. CRL (177 submissions): the CRL attracted large number of comments, both positive and negative. Supporters feel that it is an essential component in improving the region‟s PT system, but opponents were concerned about the cost, especially given the apparent lack of Government support. There was concern that the level of funds required could “crowd out” other necessary projects. Western ring route (16 submissions): submitters were generally in favour of completion of the western ring route. AMETI (45 submissions): While submissions that commented on AMETI were generally supportive of the project, some concerns were expressed about elements of the project. A number of submitters felt that the focus should be on PT improvements, and the need for some of the road components was questioned. Comments were also received on the potential extension of the AMETI project to encompass an east-west connection through to SH20. Page 3 of 52 Hearing Draft Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-2015 Dominion Road (8 submissions): generally supported, but some suggestions for modifications to elements of the project. Tiverton/Wolverton (8 submissions): generally supported Albany Highway (9 submissions): submitters were supportive of the project, but critical of the proposed 5 year construction timeframe. A shorter implementation period was recommended, to alleviate concerns over safety and disruption, especially for schools in the area. Redoubt Rd/Mill Rd (6 submissions): submitters generally supported this project, but comments were made in relation to timing, to coincide with development in the area. Other significant themes to emerge included: Integrated ticketing/AIFS (51 submissions): seen as a high priority by most, but some concerns at the high cost and implementation problems associated with HOP to date. Rail to the airport (44 submissions): Majority support amongst those that submitted on this issue; opponents raised concerns over cost and justification at this time. Waitemata Harbour Crossing (69 submissions): submissions on this subject generally favoured a continuation of planning and route protection for an additional harbour crossing, with preference expressed for a tunnel. Some submissions expressed concern at the cost of a new crossing, and there was some concern (mainly from local communities) about the location of the crossing. Public transport network planning (250 submissions): a large number of submissions addressed issues to do with public transport services, often requesting specific improvements or adjustments to services in local areas. The Auckland Harbour Bridge Pathway project received a strong level of support, with submitters concerned that it was not included in the Draft. Completion of the regional cycle network also received strong support. Integration of land use and transport: This was generally supported as a priority, but some submitters pointed to projects that did not appear to be consistent with the concept. For example, a number of submitters referred to the need for the development of a new station and park and ride facility at Walters Road, adjacent to the town centre, rather than an upgrade of the existing Takanini Station. City centre focus: A number of submissions, generally from outer areas, were critical of the focus of transport expenditure on the city centre. Submitters noted that a relatively small proportion of trips are focused on the CBD, and that there was a need to ensure that transport issues elsewhere in Auckland were adequately addressed, and not “crowded out” by funding for major city centre projects (especially the CRL). Seal extensions: a number of submitters from rural areas expressed concern at the limited budget available for seal extensions, which is not considered adequate to achieve a reasonable programme of work. Page 4 of 52 Hearing Draft Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-2015 Submitters to be heard: summary of key points The key points from the written submissions of those wishing to be heard are summarised below, in order of appearance. Because the Draft RLTP was released for public comment alongside the Auckland Council LTP, a number of submitters have commented on transport issues as part of a submission on LTP. In other cases, submissions to the RLTP have raised issues that are more appropriately addressed as part of the LTP consultation process. Officers have attempted to ensure that the matters that are dealt with by the RLTP are relevant to that document, but inevitably there is some overlap, especially in matters relating to funding allocations and prioritisation. MONDAY, 16 APRIL 2012 9:00 - Brendon Cullen Amount proposed for road seal extensions across the region is pathetic, at only around $500,000 p.a.
Recommended publications
  • Full Article

    Full Article

    NOTORNIS Journal of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand Volume 23 Part 4 December 1976 OFFICERS 1976 - 77 k- President - Mr. B. D. BELL, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington Vice-president - Mrs J. B. HAMEL, 42 Ann Street, Rqslyn, Dunedin Dunedin Editor - Mr. E. W. DAWSON, P.O. Box 41-002,Eastbourne Treasurer - Mr. H. W. M. HOGG, P.O. Box 3011, Dunedin Secretary - Mr. P. D. GAZE, P.O. Box 30466, Lower Hutt Council Members: Dr. BEN D. BELL, 45 Gurney Road, Belmont, Lower Hutt Dr. P. C. BULL, 131 Waterloo Road, Lower Hutt Mr. M. L. FALCONER, 188 Miromiro Road, Normandale, Lower Hutt Mr. F. C. KINSKY, C/- National Museum, Private Bag, Wellington Mr. D. V. MERTON, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington Mrs. S. M. REED, 4 Mamaku Street, Auckland 5 Mr. R. R. SUTTON, Lorneville, No. 4 R.D., Invercargill Auckland 10 Conveners and Organisers: Rare Birds Committee: Mr. F. C. KINSKY, C/- National Museum, Private Bag, Wellington Beach Patrol: Mr. C. R. VEITCH, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, P.O. Box 2220, Auckland Card Committee: R. N. THOMAS, 25 Ravenswood Drive, Forest Hill, Auckland 10 Field Investigation Committee: Mr. B. D. BELL Librarian: Miss A. J. GOODWIN, R.D. 1, Clevedon Nest Records: Mr. D. E. CROCKETT, 21 McMillan Ave., Kamo, Whangarei Recording (including material for Classified Summarised Notes) : Mr. A. T. EDGAR, Inlet Road, Kerikeri Representative on Member Bodies' Committee of Royal Society of N.Z.: Mr. B. D. BELL SUBSCRIPTIONS AND MEMBERSHIP Annual Subscription: Ordinary .membership $6; HusbandIWife member- ship $9; Life membership $120 (age over 30); Junior member- ship (age under 20) $4.50; Family membership (one Nofornis per household) other members of a family living in one house- hold where one is already a member $3; Institutional subscrip- tions $10; overseas subscriptions $1.50 extra.
  • Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page

    Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page

    Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page Please note: As some submitters did not provide their first names they have been ordered in the submissions received list under their title. These submitters are as follows: o Mr Burgess is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr o Mrs Davey is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Dromgool is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Peters is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mr Ripley is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr We apologise for any confusion the above ordering of submissions may have caused. If your submission is not displayed here, contains incorrect information or is missing some parts, please email us on [email protected] or contact Mathew Stewart on (09) 447 4831 Sub # Submitter Page 851 J Dromgool 13 870 Jacob Phillips 13 15 Jacob Samuel 13 178 Jacqueline Anne Church 13 685 Jacqui Fisher 13 100 James Houston 13 854 James Lockhart 13 302 Jamie Revell 13 361 Jan Heijs 14 372 Jane Blow 14 309 Jane Briant-Turner 14 482 Janet Hunter 14 662 Janet Pates 14 656 Janie Flavell 14 634 Jarrod Ford (NB: we apologise if this name is incorrect, we were 14 unable to clearly decipher the writing) 718 Jason Lafaele 14 605 Jaydene Haku 15 746 Jeanette Collie 15 149 Jeanette Valerie Cooper 15 177 Jennifer Collett 15 681 Jennifer Olson 15 818 Jennifer Preston 15 832 Jenny TeWake 15 1 Sub # Submitter Page 373 Jeremy Lees-Green 15 85 Jesse McKenzie 16 843 Jessica Currie
  • Hauraki Gulf District Plan Review

    Hauraki Gulf District Plan Review

    Land Units Land Unit 1 – Coastal Cliffs Land Unit 2 – Dune Systems and Sand Flats Land Unit 3 – Alluvial Flats Land Unit 4 – Wetland Systems Land Unit 5 – Foothills and Lower Slopes Land Unit 6 – Steep Pastured Slopes Land Unit 7 – Steep Infertile Coastal Slopes Land Unit 8 – Regenerating Slopes Land Unit 9 – Low Fertility Hills Land Unit 10 – Forest and Bush Areas Land Unit 11 – Traditional Residential Land Unit 12 – Bush Residential Land Unit 13 – Retailing Land Unit 14 – Visitor Facilities Land Unit 15 – Industrial Land Unit 16 – Quarrying Land Unit 17 – Landscape Amenity Land Unit 18 – Outdoor Activities Land Unit 19 – Community Activities Land Unit 20 – Landscape Protection Land Unit 21 – Te Whau Peninsula Land Unit 22 – Western Landscape Land Unit 23 – Conservation Islands Land Unit 24 – Pakatoa Land Unit 25 – Wharf Land Unit 26 – Rotoroa Introduction The Hauraki Gulf is a place of environmental beauty and a very special place for both locals and visitors alike. The next Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan will take the islands forward to 2020 and we can only guess the changes that may impact on the Gulf during this time. The review of the District Plan is an opportunity to look at how we contribute to the social, economic, cultural and environmental wellbeing of the islands - factors which contribute to the purpose of the Resource Management Act. The Resource Management Act 1991 requires us to act in a sustainable manner. We need to be able to provide for the needs of present and future generations so that development undertaken today is sustainable in the longer-term.
  • Aotea / Great Barrier Island Historic Heritage Survey Appendix 3 PDF 1.8

    Aotea / Great Barrier Island Historic Heritage Survey Appendix 3 PDF 1.8

    Appendix 3-Current List of Sites Aotea Great Barrier Island May 2019 Prepared by Megan Walker and Robert Brassey © 2019 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Cover image: Observation Post, Kaikoura Island (Auckland Council 2018) 1 Computer CHI NZHPT Unitary Plan District Plan Number Site Type Name Location Registration Schedule Schedule Miners Head | Aotea Island | Great Barrier Island | Hauraki Gulf Islands | 11 SHIPWRECK RORY O'MORE Hauraki Gulf | Offshore Island None Tryphena | Aotea Island | Great Barrier 201 LANDING Island.
  • Local Board Information and Agreements Draft Long-Term Plan 2012-2022

    Local Board Information and Agreements Draft Long-Term Plan 2012-2022

    DRAFT LONG-TERM PLAN 2012-2022_ VOLUME FOUR LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS DRAFT LONG-TERM PLAN 2012-2022_ VOLUME FOUR LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS About this volume About this volume This is Volume Four of the four volumes that make up the draft LTP. It is set out in two parts, one which provides background on the role of local boards, their decision-making responsibilities and some general information about local board plans and physical boundaries. The second part contains the individual local board agreements for all 21 local boards, which contain detailed information about local activities, services, projects and programmes and the corresponding budgets for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013. Here we have also included additional information like ten-year budgets for each board and a capital projects list. What this volume covers: the status of draft local board agreements how to have your say during the public consultation period an overview of the local boards local board activities information on the development of local board plans and agreements local board financial information including a consolidated statement of expenditure on local activities about each local board, with an overview of the local board including their strategic priorities and a message from the chairperson draft local board agreements for each local board covering scope of activities levels of service and performance measures local activities including key initiatives and projects expenditure and funding notes to the local board agreements contact details, how to contact your local board, including individual contact details for each local board member an appendix to each Local Board information section which includes their expenditure statements and capital projects for the ten-year period 2012 to 2022.
  • Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction

    Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction

    Part II: Activities and services Introduction PART II ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Auckland Council provides a range of goods and services. These are detailed in the following sections where the activities undertaken by the council and its CCOs are described. Each section includes details of the expenditure, the projects and achievements together with the levels of service which were provided and details of the performance measures. The performance measures describe either what we set out to achieve or levels of customer satisfaction. Results show performance against the standard (target) we set ourselves. The sections provide information about: • the groups of activities undertaken by Auckland Council. Activities are grouped together because of their connectivity with each other • individual activities undertaken. Individual activities are goods and services delivered to the community – for example, the provision of facilities, providing grants and the performance of regulatory and other functions. Note that some activities are provided by the CCOs. While each set of performance measures, results and commentaries cover the full activity provided by the council and Group, only the portions funded directly by the council are covered in the financial statements. A summary of the total expenditure of the CCOs is covered in the CCO section. Following the sections about the council’s activities, there is coverage of the activities of the 21 local boards, and this is followed by the CCO section. The council has 11 groups of activities: • Community • Lifestyle and Culture • Economic Development • Planning and Regulation • Environmental Management • Solid Waste • Water Supply and Wastewater • Stormwater • Transport • Commercial and Investment • Governance Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 52 Part II: Activities and services Introduction EXPLAINING OUR GROUP ACTIVITY STATEMENTS Each group activity statement is broken down into the following headings: OVERVIEW Why the council is involved.
  • Dog Exercise Areas

    Dog Exercise Areas

    Summary of the public places where dogs are allowed on Great Barrier Island (Great Barrier and Waiheke Local Board areas) This information only applies to park, beach and foreshore areas under the control of Auckland Council or the Department of Conservation. Be a responsible dog owner • Keep your dog under control at all times. • Respect other people’s personal space. Public places are for everyone’s enjoyment and not everyone is fond of dogs. Remember, under control off-leash areas are shared spaces. • Pick up after your dog and carry something (e.g. a bag or pooper scooper) to pick-up your dogs’ faeces. Dog faeces should be disposed of in bins. • Know when your dog will ignore commands: put dog on-leash, shorten leash, or avoid the area altogether - even if you are in an off-leash area. Under control off-leash areas On Great Barrier Island, dogs are allowed under control off a leash in the following areas: • Gooseberry Flat**. Northern end to the bluff, including bluff around to the public toilets and including headland reserve between Gooseberry Flat and Pa Beach. • Okiwi northern side of airstrip next to the Okiwi airfield. Under control on-leash areas Dogs are allowed under control on a leash on all park and foreshore areas not specifically identified as a prohibited or off-leash area. Restricted areas There are areas where you may need a permission to access with your dog or where dog access varies depending on the time of day or year. Beaches on Great Barrier Island: • Dogs are allowed under control off a leash in: o Awana Beach.
  • Summary of Submissions

    Summary of Submissions

    Additional limitations – outer islands Designations Map ref Location Decision requested Submission no. 42-10 Aotea Road Amend the address at Appendix 7, Table A7.3 designation reference 42-10 Okiwi Primary School to read 'Aotea Road, 1056/1 Okiwi, Great Barrier Island'. 42-11 Okiwi Airfield Delete condition 2.2 in table A7.4 as it is neither practicable nor necessary to limit aircraft movements at Okiwi 353/1 airfield at this time. 42-11 Okiwi Airfield In table A7.3, description of designation 42-11, add "Helipads". 353/2 42-11 Okiwi Airfield To condition 6.1b in table A7.4, add "Regard for the safety of parked vehicles is to be taken into account, and 353/3 screening should not facilitate vandalism or theft." 42-11 Okiwi Airfield To ensure that Okiwi Airstrip is sealed so that it becomes an all weather facility. 3612/1 42-11 Okiwi Airfield Define the terms used in relation to Airfields in particular Okiwi airfield (map 42-11) e.g. Does the term 'flight 3796/1 movements' apply to all types of aircraft, or only aeroplanes, or somewhere in between ? Does a 'flight movement' comprise a take-off and landing or a take-off or landing ? 42-11 Okiwi Airfield Once the term airfield is defined and any other undefined terms are defined, repeat the submission process, as it is 3796/2 impossible to interpret the plan's intent from the information supplied, ie. the consultation process has been inadequate. 54-9 Kaitoke Lane, 44-50 With respect to the notice of requirement (map ref 54-9) notes that a Kaitoke School is a state, full primary catering 2722/1 for year 1 - year 8 students.
  • New Zealand Gazette

    New Zealand Gazette

    ijumb. 17. 371 81JPPLEMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1936. WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1936. INLA.ND Ml-~IL- SERVIOES: NORTH ISLAND JNORTHERN PORTION, 1936-38. lSOUTHERN PORTION, 1934-36. SOUTH ISLAND, 1935-37. 372 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 17 Inland Mail-services. Post and Telegraph Department, General Post Office, Wellington, C. I, 26th February, 1936. THE following list of mail-services within the Dominion in operation as on the 1st January, 1936, is published for general information. G. McNAMARA, Director-General. POSTAL DISTRICT OF AUCKLAND. Service. y Annual ITei'~it;:a~fon I !l J____ F_rc_q,--u_en_c_ _. I _co_~_~_~y_ea_~_~_e·_1 Na"", of Conka"'o,. Subsidy. of Contract. -----.~--.- £ s. d. I Albany and Red Vale 13 Twice weekly ----r Lo"Y 0' horse E. W<ight 35 0 0 2 Aranga Railway-station and Post-office 3 Thrice weekly Wagon E. W. Ashwin 25 0 0 3 Auckland and Avondale (one way only) 8 As required .. Electric tram- Auckland Trans- 6d. per bag car port Board ( Auckland and Bayswater .. 4 I 4 ~ Auckland and Devonport 5 ~As required .. Steam ferry Devonport Steam 180 0 0 lAuckland, Northcote, and Birkenhead 5 j Ferry Co., Ltd. 5 Auckland and Buckland's Beach . .. 34 Daily Motor-bus .. Passenger Trans­ 28 0 0 port Co., Ltd. 6 Auckland: Clearing receivers within ~ As required Motor-vans (Deptl. officer) .. radius of 4t miles of Chief Post-office ( Auckland: Delivery of postmen's As required l 7 ~ extra bags ~ Motor-vans (Deptl. officer) .. I Auckland: Delivery of parcels in city Twice daily in city; d a ilY I l and suburbs in suburbs J .

  • No 18, 22 March 1939

    Jumb. 18. 659 SUPPLEMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 1939. WELLINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22, 1939. INLAND MAIL - SERVICES, NORTH ISLAND { NORTHERN PORTION, 1939 .. 41. SOUTHERN PORTION, 1937 .. 39. SOUTH ISLAND, 1938-40. 660 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 18 Inland Mail-8ervices. Post and Telegraph Department, General Post Office, Wellington, 20th March, 1939. THE following list of mail-services within the Dominion in operation as on the 1st January, 1939, is published for general information. • G. McNAMARA, Director-Genera!. POSTAL DISTRICT OF AUCKLAND. Annual Date 01 ~ ~ SeTV,·ce. d04') Frequency. Conveyance.Mode of Name 0 f Cotttractor. Subsidy. Termination .g,,~.~ I I I I Iof Contract. ~o~~~ ______________________________ ; ~~ .__________________ ~ __________~ _____________ £ s. d_ Albany and Red Vale (rural delivery) 28t I Thrice weekly Motor-car R. R. Smith 29 180 2 Aranga Railway-station and Post-office 3 . Thrice weekly Wagon E. W. Ashwin 25 0 0 rAuckland and Bayswater .. 41 3 ~ Auckland and Devonport .. 5 ';. As required Steam-ferry Devonport Steam 180 0 0 lAuckland, Northcote, and Birkenhead • 5 j Ferry Co., Ltd. 4 Auckland and Buckland's Beach 34 Daily Motor-bus .. Passenger Trans­ 28 0 0 port Co., Ltd. 5 Auckland: Clearing receivers within a As required Motor-vans (Dept!. officer) .. radius of 7 miles of Chief Post-office 6 Auckland and Dargaville (one way only) 119 Five times weekly Motor.lorry N.Z. Railways 25 0 0 Road Services. rAuckland: .Delivery of parcels in city Twice dailv in city; 1 7 ~ and suburbs daily in sUhurbs ;'Motor-vans (Dept!. officer) .. LDelivery of postmen's overflow bags As required j 8 Auckland.

  • Aotea/Great Barrier Natural Environment-Islands Monthly Update December & January

    Aotea/Great Barrier Natural Environment-Islands monthly update December & January Prepared for the Great Barrier Local Board 28/01/2020 Aotea Great Barrier Local Board funded programmes Argentine ant & Plague skink surveillance • Rosalie bay Rd – Because of the connectivity with the Mulberry Grove Argentine ant site, sites at top of road were monitored with nothing detected. • A selection of sites between Okiwi airfield and Orama were monitored with neither Argentine ants nor Plague skinks detected. Okiwi Community Pest Coordinator • Rat trapping is continuing, cat trapping will resume in February. • The coordinator is in the process of doing a door to door visit with people revisiting priorities for the project given a number have dropped out of rat trapping. The survey completed in 2017 will be revisited as a prompt, however the visits will be more focused as an opportunity to chat face to face with individuals about where they see the project going. • The results will be available in March 2020. • feedback to date indicates a desire to continue with community led bird counts in addition to the island wide counts, to continue rat trapping on public land, to put more emphasis on rat monitoring than recording every capture on all private land (many are using rat bait or a combo of traps and rat bait). Pest Pathways • Pest pathway ambassadors attended training with Conservation Advisors in December. • Key message: Buy Locally - This message covers three aspects of environmental protection, waste minimisation, low carbon and biosecurity. By reducing freight to Aotea visitors can reduce their carbon footprint and reduce the risk of inadvertently transporting pest species.
  • Volume 2 Local Board Information and Agreements

    Volume 2 Local Board Information and Agreements

    2011 June 22 ADOPTION- FOR DRAFT LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS VOLUME 2 HOW THIS PLAN IS ARRANGED Auckland Council’s annual plan 2011/2012 comes in three volumes. Volume 1 of the plan contains the council’s plan for the region. Volume 3 contains changes to licensing and consents fees and charges. This Volume 2 contains the following for each of the 21 local boards: Overview of local board responsibilities and budgets Information about the local board The local board agreement covering the specific area, including aspects for negotiation that were carried out with the governing body The local board’s contact details Volume 1 sets out an overview of key information across the region, including summary information on changes to the long term plan, information on activities and council-controlled organisations, and the Auckland Council’s prospective financial statements. Note that Volume 1 also includes information on the activities each local board is responsible for, and summary information on funding provided to all local boards. You should read this volume in conjunction with Volume 1. Volume 3 includes a list of the changes to existing licensing and consent charges such as building control, resource consents and other licensing and compliance fees and charges. Amendments to the long-term plan In addition to the annual plan, there is also a separate document called Amendments to Auckland Council’s Long-term Plan 2010-2019. This contains full details of the new policies and amendments to existing policies that represent significant changes to those set out in the Long-term Plan 2010-2019.