Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Operations Plan (TEOP, 2019 Version)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Operations Plan (TEOP, 2019 Version) Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Management Agency The Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 Promulgation Document/Signature Page Transmitted herewith is the Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Operations Plan (TEOP) for the United States Virgin Islands and supersedes all previous formats and revisions. The purpose of the TEOP is to establish the overall framework within which all entities of Territorial government, non-governmental organizations, private sector, and our citizens will operate in an integrated and coordinated fashion before, during and after a disaster. This plan is in accordance with existing federal and territorial statutes and understandings of the various departments involved. It will be reviewed and recertified periodically by the Director of the Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Management Agency (VITEMA). All recipients are requested to advise VITEMA of any and all changes which might result in its improvement or increase in its usefulness. By virtue of the authority vested in me, by the United States Virgin Islands, I hereby promulgate and issue the Territorial Emergency Operations Plan as the official guidance of all concerned. Approval and Implementation Approved December 31, 2019 Daryl D. Jaschen Director Record of Changes Date of Section Page(s) Description of Changes(s) Feedback Change(s) Change(s) provide by: made by: 5/25/17 28, EOC Activation Patton 34-35 All-Hazards Siren System activation 12/29/19 Table 1 7 Hazard and Threat Analysis Browne Summary Table 2 9 Earthquake Magnitude/Intensity Comparison Table 3 56 Emergency Support Functions Responsibility Assignment Table 4 59 Succession of Authority Annex 1 65 All Hazards Check List Figure 1 24 Territory Organizational Chart Figure 2 64 USVI Hurricane Preparation & Response Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 Record of Distribution The TEOP is digitally published at the following website: VITEMA’s Website: www.vitema.vi.gov 3 Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 Table of Contents Promulgation Document/Signature Page ....................................................................................................................... 2 Record of Distribution ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose, Scope, Situation, Assumptions ......................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1: Hazard and Threat Analysis Summary……………………………………………………………………………..7 Table 2: Earthquake Magnitude / Intensity Comparison………………………………………………………………..9 Figure 1: Emergency Management Lines of Communications and Key Agencies / Partners……………24 Organization and Assignment of Responsibilities .................................................................................................... 24 Direction, Control, and Coordination............................................................................................................................. 35 Information Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination ............................................................................................. 37 Communications .................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Administration, Finance, and Logistics ......................................................................................................................... 47 Plan Development and Maintenance ............................................................................................................................. 51 Authorities and References ............................................................................................................................................... 52 Table 3 – Emergency Support Functions Responsibilities Assignments ........................................................ 56 Table 4 – Succession of Authority ................................................................................................................................... 59 Attachment A - After Action Report ............................................................................................................................... 61 Attachment B – Memorandums of Understanding, Memorandums of Agreements, and other agreements ............................................................................................................................................................................... 63 Figure 2- USVI Hurricane Preparation and Response: Phased ........................................................................... 64 Annex……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….65 A. All Hazards Checklist ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 Purpose, Scope, Situation, Assumptions Purpose The Territorial Emergency Operations Plan (TEOP) provides the foundation for territorial emergency response and recovery operations. It identifies the role of territorial government and coordinating Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and private sector partners before, during, and after a disaster, large-scale emergency, or event affecting the US Virgin Islands. It establishes the concepts and policies under which all elements of territorial government and coordinating NGO’s and private sector partners will operate during emergencies and provides the framework within which more detailed emergency plans or procedures can be developed and maintained. This plan is compatible with federal plans and statuses in order to provide prompt, effective and seamless assistance to districts when federal assistance is requested. In addition, executive branch agencies and instrumentalities are required to develop, maintain and ensure their ability to implement an all-hazards continuity plan. These continuity plans must include alternate operating capabilities and identify the functions, applications and processes of the agency or instrumentalities that are critical, time-sensitive, and essential to restore and continue in an emergency or disaster. Agency functions critical to territorial emergency response and recovery operations shall have restoration priority. Top priorities for incident management are to: 1. Save lives and protect the health and safety of the public, responders, and recovery workers; 2. Protect property and mitigate damages and impacts to individuals, communities and the environment; 3. Protect and restore critical infrastructure and key resources; and 4. Facilitate recovery of individuals, businesses, communities, governments, and the environment. Scope Preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation strategies are largely based on analyses of natural and technological hazards with a history of or potential for impacts in the US Virgin Islands. The TEOP is designed to address all hazards identified in the Threat and Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA). The TEOP covers the full range of complex and constantly changing requirements in anticipation of, or response to, threats or acts of terrorism, major disasters, other emergencies, and events within or affecting the Territory. The TEOP establishes interagency, multi-jurisdictional, and public/private mechanisms for territorial agency involvement in domestic incident management operations. These mechanisms include coordination structure and processes for incident requiring: Local-to-local support through Territory Mutual Aid (TMA); Territory support to St. Croix District and St. Thomas-St. John- Water Island District State-to-Territory support through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) 5 Territorial Emergency Operations Plan December 2019 or other appropriate instruments; and Public and private sector incident management integration. This Plan is applicable to all agencies of the Territory and coordinating NGOs and private sector partners that may be requested to provide assistance or conduct operations in response to an incident or event. This Plan also provides the foundation for the organization and coordination of short-term recovery. To ensure the Territory’s ability to implement this Plan, each territorial agency that is tasked with a responsibility in the TEOP or supporting plans and annexes shall develop, maintain, and ensure their ability to implement response plans in support of the TEOP, as required by Code of Virgin Islands Title 23, Section 10- Territorial Emergency Management Act. Situation Overview 1. Vulnerability Analysis (Demographics) a. The U.S. Virgin Islands 2018 population is estimated to be just below 96,211 which is a decrease from 2010 census estimate of 106,405. b. The following tourist information for 2018 is provided by the V.I. Bureau of Economic Research: i. Cruise ship passenger arrivals: 1,878,847 • St. Thomas/St. John:1,366,390 • St. Croix: 79,689 ii. Airline passenger arrivals: 477,840 • St. Thomas/St. John: 321,928 • St. Croix: 155,912 c. The proximity of the large
Recommended publications
  • United States Virgin Islands Territorial Hazard Mitigation Plan Final, July 2019
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in implementing the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, initiated far-reaching programs and policies that affected the approach to emergency management of every level of government. The legislation reinforces the importance of hazard mitigation planning and assigns specific responsibilities to state governments, which also apply to its territories such as the US Virgin Islands. The underlying purpose of the United States Virgin Islands Territorial Hazard Mitigation Plan is to identify strategies and actions that can be taken before a disaster strikes, and that can significantly reduce human suffering, damage to property, and the long- term economic impact of natural hazards. In September 2017, an unprecedented event occurred were two catastrophic Category 5 hurricanes tore through the US Virgin Islands within 14 days of each other. The storms crippled the Territory, destroying communications, power grid, and other infrastructures. Homes and businesses were demolished beyond repair. As the territory rebuilds, Hazard and Risk Assessments have been analyzed to determine the adequate Mitigative Efforts to prevent similar destruction from happening again with future storms. Capacity building and collaborative community efforts have also been incorporated into the plan update, which would create initiatives where the Territory would be able to be ultimately self-sustainable. States and territories are required to prepare and submit a mitigation plan and then review and update the plan on a five-year planning cycle The Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Management Agency (VITEMA) has established a Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee to provide oversight and assist in the Plan Update process. See pages 1-8 as examples, which provide an overview.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Synoptic Analyses of Heavy Rainfall in the Southeastern United States
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1994 Temporal and Synoptic Analyses of Heavy Rainfall in the Southeastern United States. Barry David Keim Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Keim, Barry David, "Temporal and Synoptic Analyses of Heavy Rainfall in the Southeastern United States." (1994). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5732. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5732 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Data on Major Disasters Worldwide, 1900-Present
    DISASTER HISTORY Signi ficant Data on Major Disasters Worldwide, 1900 - Present Prepared for the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance Agency for International Developnent Washington, D.C. 20523 Labat-Anderson Incorporated Arlington, Virginia 22201 Under Contract AID/PDC-0000-C-00-8153 INTRODUCTION The OFDA Disaster History provides information on major disasters uhich have occurred around the world since 1900. Informtion is mare complete on events since 1964 - the year the Office of Fore8jn Disaster Assistance was created - and includes details on all disasters to nhich the Office responded with assistance. No records are kept on disasters uhich occurred within the United States and its territories.* All OFDA 'declared' disasters are included - i.e., all those in uhich the Chief of the U.S. Diplmtic Mission in an affected country determined that a disaster exfsted uhich warranted U.S. govermnt response. OFDA is charged with responsibility for coordinating all USG foreign disaster relief. Significant anon-declared' disasters are also included in the History based on the following criteria: o Earthquake and volcano disasters are included if tbe mmber of people killed is at least six, or the total nmber uilled and injured is 25 or more, or at least 1,000 people art affect&, or damage is $1 million or more. o mather disasters except draught (flood, storm, cyclone, typhoon, landslide, heat wave, cold wave, etc.) are included if the drof people killed and injured totals at least 50, or 1,000 or mre are homeless or affected, or damage Is at least S1 mi 1l ion. o Drought disasters are included if the nunber affected is substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Storm Lee (AL132011) 2-5 September 2011
    Tropical Cyclone Report Tropical Storm Lee (AL132011) 2-5 September 2011 Daniel P. Brown National Hurricane Center 15 December 2011 Lee was a tropical storm that evolved into a subtropical cyclone before making landfall in southern Louisiana. Lee and its remnants contributed to heavy rainfall and extensive flooding over portions of the eastern United States. a. Synoptic History Lee developed from a tropical wave that moved off the west coast of Africa on 18 August. The vigorous wave was accompanied by a broad low pressure area that passed over the Cape Verde Islands on 19-20 August. The low, however, moved northwestward and encountered hostile environmental conditions that prevented development. Meanwhile, the southern portion of the wave continued westward across the tropical Atlantic and eastern Caribbean Sea during the next week or so, and as it moved across the western Caribbean Sea and into the southeastern Gulf of Mexico on 30 and 31 August, shower and thunderstorm activity gradually increased and gained organization. Satellite and surface data indicate that a broad area of low pressure formed from this system over the central Gulf of Mexico on 1 September. Data from a NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft mission late that day showed that the circulation became better defined, and it is estimated that this system became a tropical depression around 0000 UTC 2 September, centered about 190 n mi southwest of the mouth of the Mississippi River. After development, the depression moved slowly northward and strengthened into a tropical storm 12 h later. The “best track” chart of Lee’s path is given in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Resilience
    Planning for Resilience Paramaribo, Suriname Dr. Omar D. Bello ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for the November 6, 2018 Caribbean Outline 1 2 3 4 Caribbean Planning and Planning for Pillars of countries and SDGs Resilience Disaster Risk disaster Management vulnerability Disaster vulnerability Data from the World Risk Index, which evaluates countries’ exposure and vulnerability to risks associated with natural phenomena, shows that over 60 per cent of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean present medium to very high risk in the face of disasters. Of these, over half have high and very high risk levels. The CARICOM states fall in to this group. The effects of climate change in the region over recent years have led to natural phenomena becoming both more numerous and more intense. This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Vulnerability exacerbated by Climate Change .This will damage .Coastline losses .A 1.8mm annual .It is estimated infrastructure and have a greater increase in sea that 70% of housing, with the impact on the level has been beaches will lose majority of economy as a observed in the 0.25-9M of population in result of loss of Caribbean shoreline a year coastal areas tourism receipts 16 Number of 14 events and 12 number of 10 affected 8 countries in 6 the English- speaking 4 Caribbean 2 0 number of affected countries number of events 7000000 Damage 6000000 related to 5000000 storms in the 4000000 English- 3000000 speaking Caribbean 2000000 (2017 ‘000 US$) 1000000 0 Year Event Year Event 1990 Hurricane
    [Show full text]
  • National Scale Landslide Hazard Assessment Along the Road Corridors of Dominica and Saint Lucia
    NATIONAL SCALE LANDSLIDE HAZARD ASSESSMENT ALONG THE ROAD CORRIDORS OF DOMINICA AND SAINT LUCIA JOVANI YIFRU March, 2015 SUPERVISORS: Dr. C.J. van Westen Dr. H.R.G.K. Hack NATIONAL SCALE LANDSLIDE HAZARD ASSESSMENT ALONG THE ROAD CORRIDORS OF DOMINICA AND SAINT LUCIA JOVANI YIFRU Enschede, The Netherlands, March, 2015 Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. Specialization: Applied Earth Sciences (Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk Management) SUPERVISORS: Dr. C.J. van Westen Dr. H.R.G.K. Hack THESIS ASSESSMENT BOARD: Prof.Dr. V.G Jetten (Chair) Dr. L.P.H. (Rens) van Beek (External Examiner, Universiteit Utrecht) DISCLAIMER This document describes work undertaken as part of a programme of study at the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the Faculty. ABSTRACT The Caribbean Islands of Dominica and Saint Lucia are characterized by their intense heavy rainfall and steep slopes which give rise to frequent landslide occurrences. This has affected their limited road network greatly in the past causing road damage and impeding vehicular traffic. In this research, the landslide susceptibility of different sections of the major roads of Dominica and Saint Lucia are analysed by characterizing them by their topography, geology and soil type. Unlike Dominica, some efforts have been made in Saint Lucia to manage the landslides triggered by rainfall focusing on road related landslides and, here, the methods utilized in Saint Lucia are assessed for their applicability in Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • K7~~~~ DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT M - Workingis F 4;F;@PAPER -SERIES-, -\; \ NO.2
    K7~~~~ DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT M - WORKINGis f 4;f;@PAPER -SERIES-, -\; \ NO.2 24153 October 2001 Public Disclosure Authorized Domnmica: Natural Rx Disasters and Economic Development : in a Small Public Disclosure Authorized Island State p ~ t -- z _r ''! ' Public Disclosure Authorized C-4 a' CharlotteBenson Edward Clay irwith - S Franklyn V. Michael - Alastair W. Robertson Public Disclosure Authorized * ~The World Bank The Disaster Management Facility (DMF) of the World Bank provides proactive leadership in integrating disaster prevention and mitigation measures into the range of development related activities and improving emergency response. The DMF provides technical support to World Bank operations; direction on strategy and policy development; the generation of knowledge through work with partners across Bank regions, networks, and outside the Bank; and learning and training activities for Bank staff and clients. All DMF activities are aimed at promoting disaster risk management as an integral part of sustainable development. The Disaster Risk Management Working Paper Seres presents current research, policies and tools under development by the Bank on disaste r management issues and practices. These papers reflect work in progress and some may appear in their final form at a later date as publications inthe Bank's official Disaster Risk Management Series. Alcira Kreimer, Manager Disaster Management Facility World Bank, MSN F4K-409 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Email: [email protected] World Wide Web: www.worldbank.org/dmf Cover Photo: Corbis.com Cover design by Hager Ben-Mahmoud WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 2 Dominica: Natural Disasters and Economic Development in a Small Island State Charlotte Benson, Edward Clay with Franklyn V.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Effects and Impacts Caused by Hurricane Irma
    Assessment of the effects 20172017 1 Hurricane Irma - The Bahamas 2017 2 1 Assessment of the effects 2017 13 Hurricane Irma - The Bahamas Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Omar Bello Mission Coordinator Michael Hendrickson Macroeconomics Blaine Marcano Education Machel Pantin Research Assistant Pan American Health Organization Gustavo Mery Health Sector Specialists Carlos Espiga Housing & Water and Sanitation Franklin Espiga Roads, Ports and Air Mauricio González Description of the Event, Affected Population Adrían Flores Disaster Risk Reduction Francisco Ibarra Tourism, Fisheries Salvador Marconi National Accounts Robert Williams Power & Telecommunications Inter-American Development Bank Florencia Attademo-Hirt Country Representative Michael Nelson Chief of Operations Editorial Production Zachary Zane Editor 4 Assessment of the effects Contents List of Table 9 List of Figures 11 List of Images 11 List of Acronyms 13 Executive Summary 15 Introduction 17 Description of the Event 25 Hurricane Irma in The Bahamas 27 Weather-related Events in The Bahamas 34 1. Hurricane Joaquin 35 2. Hurricane Mathew 36 Affected Population 39 Introduction 40 1. The Evacuation to Nassau 44 2. Affected Islands 41 Demographics 42 3. Affected Population 44 PART I: ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS AND EFFECTS 48 SOCIAL SECTORS 49 Housing and Public Buildings 51 Introduction 51 1. Baseline information 51 2. Damage 52 3. Losses 55 4. Additional Costs 55 Education 56 Introduction 56 1. Baseline Information 57 2. Damage 58 3. Losses 60 4. Additional Costs 62 Health 63 Introduction 63 1. Baseline Information 63 2. Damage 65 5 Hurricane Irma - The Bahamas 3. Losses 67 4. Additional Costs 68 INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS 70 Roads, Airports, Ports and Other Infrastructure 71 Introduction 71 1.
    [Show full text]
  • P:\Swcllc\80083\REPORT-OAS-Feb
    ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES UNIT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT Revised Report on: Needs Assessment for CDCM Training Program in association with 80083 February 2001 ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES UNIT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT Revised Report on: Needs Assessment for CDCM Training Program 80083 February 2001 ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES Unit for Sustainable Development and the Environment Needs Assessment for CDCM Training Program TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................1 1.1 General .............................................................1 1.2 Description of Hurricane Lenny ..........................................2 1.3 Consultant's Scope of Work ............................................2 2 Evaluation of Capacity for CDCM ..............................................4 2.1 Development of Questionnaire ..........................................4 2.2 Agencies/Companies Contacted ........................................11 2.3 Summary of Responses ..............................................11 2.4 Possible Attendees at Courses .........................................13 3 Meetings Conducted .......................................................14 3.1 University of the West Indies ...........................................14 3.2 Caribbean Development Bank ..........................................18 3.3 Tony Gibbs/CEP ....................................................19 4 Outline of Training Program/Short Courses .....................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2013
    Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2013 Demotech, Inc. Special Report July 2014 Demotech, Inc. Special Report Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2013 1 | Page Table of Contents Alphabetical List of Florida Cyclones from 1990 - 2013 3 Introduction 4 Exhibit I - Timeline Summary of Cyclones in Florida 5 Exhibit II - Description of Florida Cyclones from 1990 - 2013 6 Exhibit III - Detailed Description Florida Cyclones from 2004 - 2013 8 Exhibit IV - Explanation of Financial Stability Ratings® from Demotech, Inc. 43 Exhibit V - Impairments, Market Share Reports, and Number of Insolvencies 45 Florida Property Carriers Ordered into Rehabilitation or Liquidation 66 Appendix A - A Comprehensive Examination of Insurer Financial Strength Ratings 71 Demotech, Inc. Special Report Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2013 2 | Page Alphabetical List of Florida Cyclones from 1990-2013 Storm Name Type of Cyclone Page # Storm Name Type of Cyclone Page # #1 (1990) Tropical Depression Ernesto (2006) Category 1 Hurricane 21 #1 (1992) Tropical Depression Fabian (1991) Tropical Storm #1 (1993) Tropical Depression Fay (2008) Tropical Storm 30 #5 (2010) Tropical Depression 36 Floyd (1999) Category 4 Hurricane #7 (2003) Tropical Depression Fran (1996) Category 3 Hurricane #9 (2000) Tropical Depression Frances (2004) Category 4 Hurricane 10 #10 (1994) Tropical Depression Gabrielle (2001) Category 1 Hurricane #10 (2007) Tropical Depression 26 Georges (1998) Category 4 Hurricane Alberto
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2010
    Impact of Storms on the Florida Property Insurance Market 1990-2010 Demotech, Inc. Special Report December 2011 1 | Page Table of Contents Alphabetical List of Florida Cyclones from 1990-2010 3 Introduction 4 Exhibit I - Timeline Summary of Cyclones in Florida 5 Exhibit II - Description of Florida Cyclones from 1990-2010 6 Exhibit III - Detailed Description Florida Cyclones from 2004-2010 8 Exhibit IV - Explanation of Financial Stability Ratings® from Demotech, Inc. 39 Exhibit V - Impairments, Market Share Reports, and Number of Insolvencies 41 Florida Property Carriers Ordered into Rehabilitation or Liquidation 59 Appendix A - A Comprehensive Examination of Insurer Financial Strength Ratings 64 2 | Page Alphabetical List of Florida Cyclones from 1990-2010 Storm Name Type of Cyclone Page # Storm Name Type of Cyclone Page # #1 (1990) Tropical Depression Ernesto (2006) Category 1 Hurricane 20 #1 (1992) Tropical Depression Fabian (1991) Tropical Storm #1 (1993) Tropical Depression Fay (2008) Tropical Storm 29 #5 (2010) Tropical Depression 35 Floyd (1999) Category 4 Hurricane #7 (2003) Tropical Depression Fran (1996) Category 3 Hurricane #9 (2000) Tropical Depression Frances (2004) Category 4 Hurricane 9 #10 (1994) Tropical Depression Gabrielle (2001) Category 1 Hurricane #10 (2007) Tropical Depression 25 Georges (1998) Category 4 Hurricane Alberto (1994) Tropical Storm Gordon (1994) Category 1 Hurricane Alberto (2006) Tropical Storm 21 Gordon (2000) Tropical Storm Alex (2010) Category 2 Hurricane 33 Grace (2003) Tropical Storm Allison (1995)
    [Show full text]
  • National Scale Landslide Susceptibility Assessment for Dominica
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305115228 National Scale Landslide Susceptibility Assessment for Dominica Technical Report · May 2016 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4313.2400 CITATIONS READS 0 832 1 author: C.J. Van Westen University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) 309 PUBLICATIONS 8,901 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Monitoring landslide risk dynamics after a major earthquake in a mountainous environment View project Seismic amplification modelling and resulting effects View project All content following this page was uploaded by C.J. Van Westen on 10 July 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The World Bank CHARIM Caribbean Handbook on Risk Information Management National Scale Landslide Susceptibility Assessment for Dominica May 2016 C.J. Van Westen Faculty of Geo‐information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente. E‐mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]