DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 IRS FORM 990-PF.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation I or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation À¾µ» Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury I Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2017 or tax year beginning , 2017, and ending , 20 Name of foundation A Employer identification number ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION 13-1623877 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) 630 FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 2200 (212) 649-1649 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption applicatmionm ism m m m m m I pending, check here NEW YORK, NY 10111 m m I G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, checkm hem rem anmd am ttamchm m m I Address change Name change computation H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminamtedI Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month terminmatIion end of year (from Part II, col. (c), line Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here 16) I $ 1,909,215,902. (Part I, column (d) must be on cash basis.) (d) Disbursements Part I Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (The (a) Revenue and total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net for charitable expenses per income income purposes may not necessarily equal the amounts in books column (a) (see instructions).) m (cash basis only) 1 Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received (attach schedule) I if the foundation is not required to 2 Check m m m m m m m m m m attach Sch. B m 5,564,835. 3 Interest on savings and temporary cash invesmtmmenmts m 4 Dividends anm d minmtemremst mfrom mm smecm urm itimesm m m m m 7,230,016. 17,975,378. 5a Gross rents b Net rental income or (loss) e 6a Net gain or (loss) from sale of assets not on line 10 94,320,461. u b Gross sales price for all n assets on line 6a 149,784,663. e v m 52,756,131. e 7 Capital gain net income (from mm Pm arm t ImV,m limnem 2m) m R 8 Net short-term capital gm amin m m m m m m m m m m 9 Income modifications 10 a Gross sales less rmetum rnms m m and allowances m b Less: Cost of goods sold m m m m c Gross profit or (loss) (attach schedm umle)m m m m m 11 Other income (attach schedule)m ATCHm m m m 1m m m 1,397,858. 2,617,084. 12 Total. Add lines 1 through 11 m m 102,948,335. 78,913,428. 13 Compensation of officers, directors, trustees, etc. 4,312,380. 1,802,215. 2,216,961. s m m m m m 4,654,505. 1,876,311. 3,185,235. e 14 Other employee salaries and wages s m m m m m m n 15 Pension plans, employee benefits 3,293,691. 521,804. 1,851,848. e m m m m m m m m m p 16 a Legal fees (attach schedule) ATCH 2 207,207. 115,641. 77,248. x m m m m m m E 147,125. 27,920. 68,250. b Accounting fees (attach schedule)ATCH 3 e m m m v 3,027,702. 2,472,095. 530,636. i c Other professional fees (attach schedule) [4] t m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a r 17 Interest t m m m s 1,850,000. 778,684. i 18 Taxes (attach schedule) (see instructions)[5] n m i 19 Depreciation (attach schedule) and depletion m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m d 20 Occupancy 1,848,933. 343,208. 1,502,258. A m m m m m m 21 Travel, conferences, and meetings 790,795. 147,464. 643,331. d m m m m m m m m m m n 22 Printing and publications 37,401. 10,943. 26,458. a m m m m m m g 23 Other expenses (attach schedule)ATCH 6 1,615,319. 12,748,448. 1,447,766. n i t 24 Total operating and administrative expenses. a r m m m m m m m m m m m 21,785,058. 20,844,733. 11,549,991. e Add lines 13 through 23 p m m m m m m m 98,469,341. 84,532,909. O 25 Contributions, gifts, grants paid 26 Total expenses and disbursements. Add lines 24 and 25 120,254,399. 20,844,733. 0. 96,082,900. 27 Subtract line 26 from line 12: m m a Excess of revenue over expenses and disbursements -17,306,064. b Net investment income (if negative, enter -0m -)m 58,068,695. c Adjusted net income (if negative, enter -0-) JSA For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see instructions. Form 990-PF (2017) 7E1410 1.000 76692K 700J 11/6/2018 9:39:00 AM V 17-7.2F 0170665-00002 Form 990-PF (2017) ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION 13-1623877 Page 2 Attached schedules and amounts in the Beginning of year End of year Part II Balance Sheets description column should be for end-of-year amom umntsm omnlym . (mSeme minsmtrum ctmionm s.m) m m m m m (a) Book Value (b) Book Value (c) Fair Market Value 1 Cash - non-interest-bearing m m m m m m m m m m m 1,263,525. 1,563,174. 1,563,174. 2 Savings and temporaIry cash investments 3 Accounts receivable I 46,433,963. Less: allowance forI doubtful accounts 46,433,963. 46,433,963. 4 Pledges receivable I Less: allowance fmorm dom umbtfmulm amccmoumntms m m m m m m m m m m m m m 5 Grants receivable 6 Receivables due from officers, directors, trustees, andm om thm emr disqualified persons (attach schedule) (see instructioIns) 7 Other notes and loans receivable (attaIch schedule) Less: allowance for doubtfmulm amccmoumntms m m m m m m m m m m m m m s t 8 Inventories for sale or use e m m m m m m m m m m m m s 9 Prepaid expenses and deferred charges s m m A 10a Investments - U.S. and state government obligations (attmacmh smchmedm ulme)[7]m m 137,525,804. 24,080,791. 24,080,791. b Investments - corporate stock (attach schedule) ATCHm m m m 8m m m m 113,525,052. 95,433,925. 95,433,925. c Investments - corporate bonds (attach schedule) ATCH 9 90,722,502. 172,086,786. 172,086,786. 11 Investments - land, buildings, I and equipment: basis Less: accumulated depreciation I (attach schedule) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 12 Investments - mortgage loans m m m m m m m m m m m m m 13 Investments - other (attach schedule) ATCH 10 1,451,020,828. 1,569,617,263. 1,569,617,263. 14 Land, buildings, and I equipment: basis Less: accumulated depreciation I (attach schedule) 15 Other assets (describe I ) 16 Total assets (to be completed bm y m am ll m fmilem rsm m- m sem em tmhem instructions. Also, see page 1, item I) m m m m m m m m m m m 1,794,057,711. 1,909,215,902. 1,909,215,902. 17 Accounts payabm lem amndm amccm rum edm em xpm enm smesm m m m m m m m m m m m 23,747,340. 20,174,062. 18 Grants payable m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 54,487,194. 68,385,938. s 19 Deferred revenue e i t m m i l 20 Loans from officers, directors, trustees, and other disqualified persons i m m m m m b 21 Mortgages and other notes payable (attach schedule) a i L I 1,041,000. 1,573,500. 22 Other liabilities (describe m m ATCHm m m m 11m m m m m) 23 Total liabilities (add lines 17 through 22) m m m m I 79,275,534. 90,133,500. Foundations that follow SFAS 117, check here X s and complete lines 24 through 26, and lines 30 and 31. e c m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n 24 Unrestricted 1,714,782,177. 1,819,082,402. a l m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a 25 Temporarily restricted B m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 26 Permanently restricted d n I Foundations that do not follow SFAS 117, check here u F and complete lines 27 through 31.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Annual Report Alfred P

    2018 Annual Report Alfred P

    2018 Annual Report Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Contents Preface II Mission Statement III From the President IV The Year in Discovery VI About the Grants Listing 1 2018 Grants by Program 2 2018 Financial Review 101 Audited Financial Statements and Schedules 103 Board of Trustees 133 Officers and Staff 134 Index of 2018 Grant Recipients 135 Cover: The Sloan Foundation Telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico as it appeared in May 1998, when it achieved first light as the primary instrument of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. An early set of images is shown superimposed on the sky behind it. (CREDIT: DAN LONG, APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY) I Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Preface The ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION administers a private fund for the benefit of the public. It accordingly recognizes the responsibility of making periodic reports to the public on the management of this fund. The Foundation therefore submits this public report for the year 2018. II Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Mission Statement The ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION makes grants primarily to support original research and education related to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and economics. The Foundation believes that these fields—and the scholars and practitioners who work in them—are chief drivers of the nation’s health and prosperity. The Foundation also believes that a reasoned, systematic understanding of the forces of nature and society, when applied inventively and wisely, can lead to a better world for all. III Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report From the President ADAM F.
  • 2015 AAPT Summer Meeting

    2015 AAPT Summer Meeting

    2015 AAPT Summer Meeting College Park, Maryland July 25–29th Coming Fall 2015: College Physics for AP® Courses OpenStax College’s upcoming title College Physics for AP® Courses is aligned to College Board® framework and focuses on the College Board® seven big ideas. Just like all OpenStax titles, College Physics for AP® Courses is free, peer-reviewed, easily customized to include up-to-the-minute information, and available online or in print. Use College Physics for AP® Courses with Rice Online’s latest physics edX.com course content and provide a complete, engaging experience for your students -- for free. Adopt, adapt, and recommend our texts at OpenStaxCollege.org. Meeting Information ............................. 6 PTRA Anniversary .................................. 8 Meeting at a Glance .............................. 10 SUMMER MEETING 2015 JULY 25-29 COLLEGE PARK, MD First Time at a Meeting? ........................ 15 AAPT Awards ......................................... 16 Plenaries ............................................... 19 Committee Meetings............................. 20 Commercial Workshops ......................... 21 College Park, MD Exhibitor Information ............................ 24 Sessions Schedules ................................ 27 July 25-29, 2015 Workshop Abstracts .............................. 31 Session Committee Sponsors ................ 38 University of Maryland Session Abstracts .................................. 39 Sunday ............................................... 39 Monday .............................................
  • Jeffrey A. Barrett Logic and Philosophy of Science University Of

    Jeffrey A. Barrett Logic and Philosophy of Science University Of

    Jeffrey A. Barrett Logic and Philosophy of Science University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-5100 [email protected] 9 September 2020 Employment 2018{present Chancellor's Professor UC Irvine 2004{2018 Professor Logic and Philosophy of Science, UC Irvine 2014{2018 Professor Philosophy, UC Irvine 1998{2004 Associate Professor Logic and Philosophy of Science, UC Irvine 1998 Associate Professor Philosophy, UC Irvine 1992-98 Assistant Professor Philosophy, UC Irvine 1990-92 Lecturer Columbia College, Columbia University Education 1992 Ph.D. with Distinction Philosophy Columbia University 1991 M.Phil. Philosophy Columbia University 1991 M.A. Philosophy Columbia University 1986 B.A. Physics Brigham Young University Areas of Specialization Philosophy of Physics, Philosophy of Science, Epistemology, Decision Theory, Game Theory, and Logic. Areas of Competence Philosophy of Mathematics, History of Empiricism, and American Pragmatism. Books and Anthologies *B5. Barrett, J. A. (2020) The Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. B4. Barrett, J. A. and P. Byrne (2012) The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works and Commentary 1955{1980, Princeton University Press. B3. Barrett, J. A. and J. Alexander, eds. (2002) PSA 2000 Volume II, Selected papers from symposium paper sessions of the Philosophy of Science Association meeting in Vancouver, Canada 2{4 November 2000. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. B2. Barrett, J. A. and J. Alexander, eds. (2001) PSA 2000 Volume I, Selected papers from contributed paper sessions of the Philosophy of Science Association meeting in Vancouver, Canada 2{4 November 2000. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. B1. Barrett, J. A. (1999) The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds, Ox- ford: Oxford University Press.
  • Quantum-Theory Wars Reference Frames, of Holding Mutually Opposing Views and of Being Free to Ramin Skibba Explores a History of Unresolved Change One’S Mind

    Quantum-Theory Wars Reference Frames, of Holding Mutually Opposing Views and of Being Free to Ramin Skibba Explores a History of Unresolved Change One’S Mind

    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS are led away to their doom”. He says what you wouldn’t expect; if Dyson has a pattern, perhaps it is contra- riety. He prefers the students at Haver- ford College, a liberal-arts university in Pennsylvania — who are “ostentatiously ill-dressed, uncombed, and unwashed” — to Princeton’s “pampered” ones. He con- tradicts himself. His wartime job at the UK Royal Air Force’s Bomber Command, analysing the effect of Allied firebomb- ing on German cities, left him “All these with a “perma- adventures in nently bad con- this strange new science”. Yet he world are still understood the unreal to me.” joy of German sailors who torpedoed Allied fuel tankers because he felt “elation” when the fire- bombing succeeded. In the late 1950s, he worked with the defence contractor General Atomic in La Jolla, California, on a project he thought would be “legendary”: a space- ship called Orion, ill-advisedly powered by nuclear explosions. Because building it required nuclear testing, he publicly opposed the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty; after Orion was defunded, he supported the treaty. Later, he became president of the anti-nuclear-proliferation Federation of American Scientists. He proposed the ‘no first use’ policy on nuclear weapons, Niels Bohr (left) with Albert Einstein in the late 1920s, when quantum mechanics was in its infancy. while admiring his theoretical-physicist friend Edward Teller for standing against PHYSICS the treaty. Dyson’s contradictions might seem confusing, but I can hear him politely and methodically explaining the rationality of seeing reality from different Quantum-theory wars reference frames, of holding mutually opposing views and of being free to Ramin Skibba explores a history of unresolved change one’s mind.
  • Christopher Alan Fuchs Curriculum Vitae 8 November 2019

    Christopher Alan Fuchs Curriculum Vitae 8 November 2019

    Christopher Alan Fuchs Curriculum Vitae 8 November 2019 Personal: Work address: Department of Physics University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Internet: [email protected] http://www.physics.umb.edu/Research/QBism/ http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=fe9uXzkAAAAJ Research Interests: Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information Quantum information theory Professional Positions (beyond postdoctoral level): Professor of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 2015{ Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany, 2014 Senior Scientist, Raytheon BBN Technologies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013{2014 Senior Researcher, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Canada, 2007{2013 Member of Technical Staff, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent, Murray Hill, New Jersey, 2000{2007 Education: Ph. D. in Physics, May 1996, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico Dissertation: \Distinguishability and Accessible Information in Quantum Theory" Advisor: Carlton M. Caves B. S. in Physics with High Honors, December 1987 B. S. in Mathematics with High Honors, December 1987 The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Research Supervisor: John Archibald Wheeler Titles, Honors, Awards, Marks of Distinction: Fellow of the American Physical Society. Elected 2012, \for powerful theorems and lucid expositions" that culminated in the view of quantum theory known as QBism. International Quantum Communication Award, 2010, citation: \for contributions to the theory of quan- tum communication including quantum state disturbance." Lee A. DuBridge Prize Postdoctoral Fellowship, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 1996{1999. Paper A45 was listed among the \top ten breakthroughs of the year 1998" by the editors of Science. The Web of Science Citation Index gives a citation count of ≥ 6; 200, with a Hirsch index h = 31 and an average of 117/paper, on the 54 journal articles it lists for me.
  • NOGLSTP-Newsletter Winter 2012

    NOGLSTP-Newsletter Winter 2012

    NOGLSTP Bulletin Winter 2012 ©National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists and Technical Professionals, Inc. NOGLSTP, PO BOX 91803, Pasadena CA 91109, phone/fax: 626 791-7689, www.noglstp.org Out to Innovate 2012 Update Presidential Appointments Project Update Volunteers and Support Needed to Build on the on GLBT Appointees for Positions on Summit’s Past Success Commissions and Panels Preparations for NOGLSTP’s signature event, Out to Innovate 2012, are moving along and excitement is building. The summit is sched- Congratulations go to Ainissa Ramirez, Ph.D., M.S., and Perry N. uled for a two-day conference this year at Ohio State University on Halkitis, Ph.D., M.S. for their recent appointments. Dr. Halkitis has October 13-14, 2012. The two-day format will allow a full day of numerous titles: Associate Dean for Research and Doctoral Studies, Out to Innovate sessions on Saturday, the annual NOGLSTP Professor of Applied Psychology and Public Health; Director of the Awards reception and gala dinner on Saturday night, and a conti- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies at the nental breakfast with an expanded exhibitor display and STEM ca- Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development reer fair on Sunday morning. at New York University; Affiliate of the Center for AIDS Research and Center for Drug Use and HIV Research at NYU. Member of the TJ Ronningen from Battelle has agreed to co-chair the event with CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention and Amy Ross. TJ and his colleagues from Battelle are helping with the Treatment at the Department of Health and Human Services can local logistics, along with Ohio State’s oSTEM student group and now be added to this list.
  • Copenhagen Interpretation Delenda Est?

    Copenhagen Interpretation Delenda Est?

    Copenhagen Interpretation Delenda Est? Review: What is Real? The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics by Adam Becker, (Basic Books, New York, 2018). Christopher A. Fuchs Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston MA 02125, USA and Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS) Wallenberg Research Centre, Marais Street, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa This is a slightly extended version of a review to appear in American Journal of Physics. The key addition is the reference list. “If you strike at a king, you must kill him,” Ralph Waldo Emerson once advised a famous law student. In this vividly written first book by Adam Becker, the overt intention is to strike at a king, Niels Bohr, key architect of the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Becker does not kill him. This is not because of the invincibility of Bohr, but a weakness of the author: So taken with his intent for destruction, Becker neglected to do much homework on the subject. Advance praise on the back cover declares “In this immensely well-researched book . ,” but anyone who has seriously studied Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli, von Weizs¨acker, Rosenfeld, and other contributors to what Heisenberg more aptly named “the Copenhagen spirit” [1] (for there are many Copenhagen interpretations ) will quickly detect that this is simply not true. The bibliography appears rich with sources (206 items), but on closer examination one finds just five collections of writings from any of the Copenhageners, and even these were not particularly used in the text—the only substantial quotes of Bohr come from two essays and an interview.
  • Misreading EPR: Variations on an Incorrect Theme

    Misreading EPR: Variations on an Incorrect Theme

    Misreading EPR: Variations on an Incorrect Theme Blake C. Stacey† †QBism Group, Physics Department, University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston MA 02125, USA October 2, 2018 Abstract Notwithstanding its great influence in modern physics, the EPR thought-experiment has been explained incorrectly a surprising number of times. 1 Introduction Expositions of the history of physics tend unhappily often to degenerate into caricature. This can happen because we are trying to teach students who don’t yet have the background knowledge to understand how discoveries were actually made [1, §11.1]. For example, the physicists who pioneered quantum mechanics knew more classical physics than modern undergraduates do, so it is really not possible to lay out the details of what those pioneers did and why. The problem is compounded when textbooks pass along these oversimplifications. We physicists are generally honest enough that we don’t deliberately fabricate history outright, but we are not trained to be historians. Getting to the point where we can assign homework is almost always a higher priority than properly chronicling the development of our field. And the trouble is compounded yet again when our subject is popularized, a process which often appears to lack any quality control whatsoever. arXiv:1809.01751v2 [quant-ph] 1 Oct 2018 All this is said as explanation, not excuse. Speaking only for myself, I thought I had gotten used to this situation. But then I started turning up examples, one after the other, of people getting the EPR experiment wrong. The thought-experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen — one of the most significant and influential conceptions of twentieth-century physics — fundamentally mangled! The issue with these passages was not their interpretation of EPR, an area where we could debate endlessly, with or without the jazz cigarettes.
  • Quantum Ontology with Dr. Adam Becker Ologies Podcast November 25, 2019

    Quantum Ontology with Dr. Adam Becker Ologies Podcast November 25, 2019

    Quantum Ontology with Dr. Adam Becker Ologies Podcast November 25, 2019 Oh, hey. It’s your old internet uncle, Dad Ward von Podcast, here with another episode of Ologies, Alie Ward. Hi. So, do you remember your first real existential crisis? Also, if you clicked on this and don’t know jack or shit about quantum physics, you’re in the right place! You’re in good company. Okay, before we spiral into deep, deep space and dark matter, let’s shine a little light on some business. So, first off, thank you to everyone on Patreon.com/Ologies for supporting the show, sending in your questions. Thanks to everyone strutting about on planet Earth in Ologies merch from OlogiesMerch.com. Also, getting a gift? Getting something for yourself? We’re having a sale this week from the Friday after Thanksgiving through Cyber Monday. 15% off anything and everything at OlogiesMerch.com. Use the code BLACKFRIDAY2019. Again, OlogiesMerch.com, code BLACKFRIDAY2019. Shannon and Boni put up some wintry new stuff for y’all. Go to town. Get a deal. It’s there for you. Also, thanks to everyone who rates, and subscribes, and especially reviews this show. You know that I peruse the reviews, and I pick a new one to read to you each week, such as, from irritated.eb: One time, I was hiking while listening to the Ferroequinology episode, when I passed a lady riding a non-iron horse, and they were both listening - I guess the lady and the horse - to the same episode on a speaker.
  • Louis Armstrong International Continuum

    Louis Armstrong International Continuum

    LOUIS ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL CONTINUUM Presented by the Center for Jazz Studies at Columbia University In conjunction with the Louis Armstrong Educational Foundation Inc. A Virtual Symposium and Concert “Some of you young folks been saying to me, ‘Hey Pops what you mean, what a wonderful world? How ‘bout all them wars all over the place?...And how ‘bout hunger and pollution?’... Seems to me it ain’t the world that’s so bad, but what we are doing to it...And all I’m saying is see what a wonderful world it would be if only we’d give it a chance. Love, baby, love. That’s the secret...” -Louis Armstrong LOUIS ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL CONTINUUM SYMPOSIUM AND CONCERT LOUIS ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL CONTINUUM THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2021 Symposium and Concert Time: 6:00pm ET | 5:00pm CT | 3:00pm PT Thursday, April 8, 2021 Time: 6:00pm ET | 5:00pm CT | 3:00pm PT LOUIS ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONALCONTINUUM SYMPOSIUM www.armstrongcontinuum.eventbrite.com 6:00pm “When It’s Sleepy Time Down South” Louis Armstrong from Concert in East Berlin 1965 FRIDAY, APRIL 9, 2021 Louis Armstrong, trumpet & vocals Time: 9:00am ET | 8:00am CT | 6:00am PT Tyree Glenn, trombone Eddie Shu, clarinet Billy Kyle, piano ABOUT THE ARMSTRONG CONTINUUM CO-PRODUCERS Arvell Shaw, bass Prof. Robert G. O’Meally Jackie Harris Danny Barcelona, drums Zora Neale Hurston Executive Director Welcome Remarks Robert G. O’Meally Professor of English and Louis Armstrong Zora Neale Hurston Professor of English and Comparative Literature, Educational Foundation, Comparative Literature; Founder and Director of Founder and Executive Director the Center for Jazz Studies Director of the Louis “Satchmo” Armstrong Interview by Robert G.
  • The Case of Adam Becker's What Is Real?

    The Case of Adam Becker's What Is Real?

    From Gender to Gleason: The Case of Adam Becker’s What Is Real? Blake C. Stacey† †QBism Group, Physics Department, University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston MA 02125, USA February 17, 2019 Abstract It is easy to argue that the founders of quantum mechanics made statements which are opaque and confusing. It is fair to say that their philosophical takes on the subject are not infrequently unsatisfying. We can all use reminders that human flaws and passions are a part of physics. So, it would be nice to have a popular book on these themes, one that makes no vital omissions, represents its sources accurately and lives up to its own ideals. Sadly, we’re still waiting. 1 Overview Imagine a biography of Isaac Newton that treated as a shocking revelation the fact that Newton was arrogant and abrasive; that accused Newton of being unscientific when, re- garding a mechanism behind gravitation, he replied “I feign no hypothesis”; that yearned for an Aristotelian understanding of the Earth-Moon interplay; that mourned the absence of women in the story of classical mechanics, while briefly dismissing Émilie du Châtelet as “Voltaire’s mistress”. Now, take that equation, replace Newton’s arrogance with Niels Bohr’s verbal obscurity, and solve to find Adam Becker’s What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics (2018). I had to take What Is Real? in small doses. It is not literally true that every time I dipped into it, I found an error of physics or a misrepresentation of history.
  • The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING and SOCIETY

    The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING and SOCIETY

    Fall 2020 The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING AND SOCIETY 50th ANNIVERSARY ISSUE 2020 The BRIDGE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Donald C. Winter, Chair John L. Anderson, President Corale L. Brierley, Vice President Carol K. Hall, Home Secretary James M. Tien, International Secretary Martin B. Sherwin, Treasurer Editor in Chief: Ronald M. Latanision Managing Editor: Cameron H. Fletcher Production Associate: Penelope Gibbs The Bridge (ISSN 0737-6278) is published quarterly by the National Acad emy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC. Vol. 50, No. S, Winter 2020 Postmaster: Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20418. Changes of address or requests to unsubscribe should be sent to [email protected]. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and timeliness. They reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. C © 2020 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Mission Statement of The Bridge The Bridge publishes articles on engineering research, education, and practice; science and technology pol- icy; and the interface between engineering and technology and society. The intent is to stimulate debate and dialogue both among members of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and in the broader community of policymakers, educators, business leaders, and other interested individuals. The Bridge relies on its editor in chief, NAE members, and staff to identify potential issue topics and guest editors. Invited guest editors, who have expertise in a given issue’s theme, are asked to select authors and topics, and inde- pendent experts are enlisted to assess articles for publication.