DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Annual Report Alfred P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Annual Report Alfred P 2018 Annual Report Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Contents Preface II Mission Statement III From the President IV The Year in Discovery VI About the Grants Listing 1 2018 Grants by Program 2 2018 Financial Review 101 Audited Financial Statements and Schedules 103 Board of Trustees 133 Officers and Staff 134 Index of 2018 Grant Recipients 135 Cover: The Sloan Foundation Telescope at Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico as it appeared in May 1998, when it achieved first light as the primary instrument of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. An early set of images is shown superimposed on the sky behind it. (CREDIT: DAN LONG, APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY) I Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Preface The ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION administers a private fund for the benefit of the public. It accordingly recognizes the responsibility of making periodic reports to the public on the management of this fund. The Foundation therefore submits this public report for the year 2018. II Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report Mission Statement The ALFRED P. SLOAN FOUNDATION makes grants primarily to support original research and education related to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and economics. The Foundation believes that these fields—and the scholars and practitioners who work in them—are chief drivers of the nation’s health and prosperity. The Foundation also believes that a reasoned, systematic understanding of the forces of nature and society, when applied inventively and wisely, can lead to a better world for all. III Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report From the President ADAM F. FALK n 2018, for only the third time in history, the Nobel exclusion of women, and the discrimination and Prize in physics was awarded to a woman. Donna disadvantage women scientists and economists have IStrickland of the University of Waterloo was hon- long faced, are fundamentally inconsistent with these ored, alongside her collaborator Gérard Mourou, for communities being healthy ones. Gender equity in the development of a revolutionary laser technique science and economics matters to us profoundly, known as chirped pulse amplification. Hearing the both for reasons of fundamental justice and because news, I found myself torn between two impulses—on sexism, by suppressing the contributions of half the the one hand, to celebrate the long overdue recogni- human race, keeps some of the best research from tion of the contributions extraordinary women have being done at all. made to physics, and on the other, to bemoan the Why is gender equality coming so slowly, particularly absurdity that Strickland is only the third woman ever in fields like physics and economics? The reasons are to be so honored. multifold and complex, but the evidence is unambig- Six months later, in May 2019, the American uous that they do not include gendered differences in Economics Association awarded the John Bates the distribution of talent or interest. Take a boy and a Clark Medal to a woman, Emi Nakamura of the girl in high school with equal aptitude for and interest University of California, for her seminal contributions in physics or economics. A decade later, the boy is in the field of macroeconomics. Presented since 1947 much more likely than the girl to be a physicist or an to an American economist under the age of 40, the economist. The gender ratio gets more imbalanced Clark Medal is considered second in prestige only to at every educational level. There is something amiss the Nobel Prize. Nakamura is the fourth woman in within the cultures of these fields, messages (some- this seventy-two-year history to receive the medal. times subtle, sometimes overt) that women don’t Again, an announcement to both celebrate and be- belong. And these messages persist despite the great moan. Change comes, but it is coming all too slowly. goodwill, the desire to do better, of many men and women in economics and the sciences. At the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, where we support research in basic science and economics, we are This is a complex problem that has no single solution. deeply concerned with the health of the communi- Interventions are needed at every stage of develop- ties of scholars who do this research. The historical ment of a young researcher. But one particularly IV Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report critical phase is the years spent as an untenured Creating a world of gender equality, and of equal- professor, with the extraordinary pressure to prove ity of all kinds, requires these two complementary oneself as a fully independent investigator while approaches. We must support individual scholars in simultaneously learning to be an effective teacher navigating the environment that exists now, while at and a good departmental citizen. Recognizing this, the same time insisting that the environment itself in 1955 Alfred P. Sloan himself established the Sloan improve over time. Bring more women to the table, Research Fellowships, one-time awards made to the but also make the table a better, more welcoming, most promising untenured faculty. We now name 126 more rewarding place for women to be. We bring Fellows each year, in eight areas of research, with an this dual philosophy to our grantmaking programs award level that will rise to $75,000 this fall. Because that are dedicated explicitly to improving representa- (unlike federal grants) the funds a Sloan Research tion in science and economics. The Sloan-supported Fellowship provides are completely unrestricted, they University Centers of Exemplary Mentoring are built are a particularly valuable source of support for a fac- on this philosophy, and their success depends on how ulty member. It’s the kind of support that can help a measures to improve diversity and those to improve talented young researcher stay in a field and develop inclusion reinforce and amplify each other. her career even in the face of being in a small and The comprehensive nature of the problem of inequal- perhaps unwelcomed minority. ity and the multifaceted approach that is required to Perhaps I should mention now that Donna Strickland ameliorate it has led us to rename our Education and was a Sloan Research Fellow. As was Emi Nakamura. Advancement for Underrepresented Groups program As were the other three women (Susan Athey, Esther the program in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Duflo, and Amy Finkelstein) who have won the John STEM Higher Education. The new name reflects bet- Bates Clark Medal. To be sure, it would be ridiculous ter both the breadth of our efforts and the ineluctable to imply that without the Sloan Fellowship these four interrelatedness of supporting diversity, insisting on distinguished scholars would not have achieved great equity, and fostering inclusion in the communities of things. Nonetheless we are proud to have supported scholars in which the Foundation is so deeply invested. them at a point when they were not yet famous, to An essential core of that deep investment is a com- have helped them along journeys not only of discovery mitment to women, to the Donna Stricklands and the but of changing the character of their fields. Emi Nakamuras, and all the women working in the More than half of the senior scholars who sit on the labs, and libraries, and lecture halls where science is Sloan Research Fellowship selection committees are done. To those women we pledge our support and women, a fact we are very proud of as these commit- partnership in working hard to honor their contribu- tees have the critical job of determining which young tions and make the institutions of science into better, scientists receive recognition and support. I suspect it more just, more welcoming places for women to be. is also part of the reason that the pool of young schol- ars nominated for Sloan Research Fellowships, as well as the ranks of the winners, are consistently more gender diverse than their fields as a whole. Support for individual women is an essential element of the Foundation’s commitment to fostering gender equity. But we also must take the opportunity to influence research culture in other, perhaps deeper, ways. In every grant proposal we consider, we ask the pro- posers to engage with gender diversity. If a grant is to support students or postdocs, what is the inves- tigator’s history of training women? If a grant is to support a conference, is there gender balance in the roster of speakers? If a grant is to support software development, is there diversity in the team that will do that work? V Alfred P. Sloan Foundation $ 2018 Annual Report The Year in Discovery SOME THINGS SLOAN GRANTEES LEARNED THIS YEAR As a grantmaking institution, Sloan works to grease the wheels of scientific progress. Our day-to-day is about how to get good ideas funded; how to make sure this or that bright young researcher gets recognized; how to make sure this methodology or that piece of technology is being used most effectively. Rational inquiry is a process, and every day we work to make that process better. But every day we also try to take a step back from the minutiae of scientific process and remind ourselves that research is about finding stuff out. At the end of all the grantmaking we do is some researcher somewhere trying to figure out how one tiny—or in the case of astronomers, not so tiny—piece of the world works. The work we fund is about discovery, and about how discovery can be a powerful tool for making the world a better place. The Foundation has more than 1,600 active grants in its portfolio. Nearly every day a Sloan-funded researcher finds out something new.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 16, 2021 1 Address: Phone: (614)
    BRUCE A. WEINBERG Address: Phone: (614) 292-5642 Department of Economics Fax: (614) 292-3906 Ohio State University E-Mail: [email protected] 410 Arps Hall Web: www.bruceweinberg.net 1945 North High Street Columbus, Ohio 43210 Education: University of Chicago, Ph.D., Economics, 1996. University of Chicago, B. A., with Honors, Economics, 1991. Professional Positions: Ohio State University, Department of Economics. - Joan N. Huber Faculty Fellow in recognition of outstanding scholarship. 2015. - Professor, October 2010-. - Associate Professor, October 2001-September 2010. - Assistant Professor, October 1996-September 2001. - Director of Undergraduate Studies, 2007-2012. - John Glenn School of Public Affairs 2007-. - Faculty Associate, Battelle Center; Center for Higher Education Excellence; Center for Human Resource Research; Criminal Justice Research Center; Center for Urban and Regional Analysis (and Oversight Committee Member); Initiative in Population Research; Mershon Center. National Bureau of Economic Research - Research Associate, 2010- - Faculty Research Fellow, 2005-2010. - Visiting Scholar 2004-2005. Visiting Scholar. Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section and Department of Economics, 2012-13. Visiting Scholar, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 2009-2010. Taubman Center, Harvard University, Visiting Scholar, 2004-2005. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Research Fellow, 2002-. Hoover Institution, National Fellow, 2000-2001. Extended Visits: Hebrew University; IZA; LSE; Maastricht University. Teaching Experience: Undergraduate Microeconomics (Honors Principles, Intermediate, Calculus-Based Intermediate, and MBA), Ohio State University. Undergraduate and Graduate Labor Economics, Ohio State University. Undergraduate Research. Ohio State University. April 16, 2021 1 Fellowships and Grants National Institutes of Health. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. PI. “Invisible Collaborators: Underrepresentation, Research Networks, and Outcomes of Biomedical Researchers.” $869,402.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Bayesian Continual Learning by Natural Gradients and Stein Gradients
    Facilitating Bayesian Continual Learning by Natural Gradients and Stein Gradients Yu Chen∗ Tom Diethe Neil Lawrence University of Bristol Amazon Amazon [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Continual learning aims to enable machine learning models to learn a general solution space for past and future tasks in a sequential manner. Conventional models tend to forget the knowledge of previous tasks while learning a new task, a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. When using Bayesian models in continual learning, knowledge from previous tasks can be retained in two ways: (i) posterior distributions over the parameters, containing the knowledge gained from inference in previous tasks, which then serve as the priors for the following task; (ii) coresets, containing knowledge of data distributions of previous tasks. Here, we show that Bayesian continual learning can be facilitated in terms of these two means through the use of natural gradients and Stein gradients respectively. 1 Background There are several existing approaches for preventing catastrophic forgetting of regular (non- Bayesian) Neural Networks (NNs) by constructing a regularization term from parameters of pre- vious tasks, such as Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) [1] and Synaptic Intelligence (SI) [2]. In the Bayesian setting, Variational Continual Learning (VCL) [3] proposes a framework that makes use of Variational Inference (VI). LVCL (θ) = Eqt(θ) [log p (Dtjθ)] − KL (qt(θ)kqt−1(θ)) : (1) The objective function is as in Equation (1), where t is the index of tasks, qt(θ) represents the approximated posterior of parameters θ of task t and Dt is the data of task t.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Human Decisions And
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HUMAN DECISIONS AND MACHINE PREDICTIONS Jon Kleinberg Himabindu Lakkaraju Jure Leskovec Jens Ludwig Sendhil Mullainathan Working Paper 23180 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23180 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2017 We are immensely grateful to Mike Riley for meticulously and tirelessly spearheading the data analytics, with effort well above and beyond the call of duty. Thanks to David Abrams, Matt Alsdorf, Molly Cohen, Alexander Crohn, Gretchen Ruth Cusick, Tim Dierks, John Donohue, Mark DuPont, Meg Egan, Elizabeth Glazer, Judge Joan Gottschall, Nathan Hess, Karen Kane, Leslie Kellam, Angela LaScala-Gruenewald, Charles Loeffler, Anne Milgram, Lauren Raphael, Chris Rohlfs, Dan Rosenbaum, Terry Salo, Andrei Shleifer, Aaron Sojourner, James Sowerby, Cass Sunstein, Michele Sviridoff, Emily Turner, and Judge John Wasilewski for valuable assistance and comments, to Binta Diop, Nathan Hess, and Robert Webberfor help with the data, to David Welgus and Rebecca Wei for outstanding work on the data analysis, to seminar participants at Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, Harvard, Michigan, the National Bureau of Economic Research, New York University, Northwestern, Stanford and the University of Chicago for helpful comments, to the Simons Foundation for its support of Jon Kleinberg's research, to the Stanford Data Science Initiative for its support of Jure Leskovec’s research, to the Robert Bosch Stanford Graduate Fellowship for its support of Himabindu Lakkaraju and to Tom Dunn, Ira Handler, and the MacArthur, McCormick and Pritzker foundations for their support of the University of Chicago Crime Lab and Urban Labs. The main data we analyze are provided by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS), and the Office of Court Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Econ 244: Market Failures and Public Policy
    Econ 244: Market Failures and Public Policy Liran Einav and Heidi Williams Winter 2021 Mondays and Wednesdays, 11:30 AM{1:20 PM Course overview. This course will cover selected topics in applied microeconomics, namely insurance and credit markets (aka \selection markets"), markets for innovation, and healthcare markets. The common theme (as the course name suggests) is that in all three contexts there are good a priori reasons to be concerned about potential market failures, suggesting that some type of government intervention or regulation may be critical for achieving efficient market outcomes. These three markets are also particularly useful in illustrating the connection and interplay between economic research and public policy. The focus of the course will be on topics, not methods, and will therefore cater to a broad set of students { especially those with interests in applied microeconomics, broadly defined. While, formally, this class is not attached to any of the second-year sequences, it should be particularly complementary to the second-year sequences in IO and public economics. In addition to discussing existing work and bringing students closer to the research frontier, the course will emphasize areas of inquiry where additional research is feasible and warranted, thus hopefully generating possible leads for second-year research papers. Course logistics. The class meets regularly on Mondays and Wednesdays, 11:30am{1:20pm. There is no class on January 18 (MLK Jr. Day) nor February 15 (Presidents' Day). We will be using Canvas to post material and send announcements. A tentative list of lectures is below. Starred papers on the reading list are those we expect to discuss in detail in class.
    [Show full text]
  • Covariances, Robustness, and Variational Bayes
    Journal of Machine Learning Research 19 (2018) 1-49 Submitted 11/17; Revised 7/18; Published 8/18 Covariances, Robustness, and Variational Bayes Ryan Giordano [email protected] Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley 367 Evans Hall, UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 Tamara Broderick [email protected] Department of EECS, MIT 77 Massachusetts Ave., 38-401 Cambridge, MA 02139 Michael I. Jordan [email protected] Department of Statistics and EECS, UC Berkeley 367 Evans Hall, UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 Editor: Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan Abstract Mean-field Variational Bayes (MFVB) is an approximate Bayesian posterior inference technique that is in- creasingly popular due to its fast runtimes on large-scale data sets. However, even when MFVB provides accurate posterior means for certain parameters, it often mis-estimates variances and covariances. Further- more, prior robustness measures have remained undeveloped for MFVB. By deriving a simple formula for the effect of infinitesimal model perturbations on MFVB posterior means, we provide both improved covariance estimates and local robustness measures for MFVB, thus greatly expanding the practical usefulness of MFVB posterior approximations. The estimates for MFVB posterior covariances rely on a result from the classical Bayesian robustness literature that relates derivatives of posterior expectations to posterior covariances and includes the Laplace approximation as a special case. Our key condition is that the MFVB approximation provides good estimates of a select subset of posterior means—an assumption that has been shown to hold in many practical settings. In our experiments, we demonstrate that our methods are simple, general, and fast, providing accurate posterior uncertainty estimates and robustness measures with runtimes that can be an order of magnitude faster than MCMC.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Most Important Statistical Ideas of the Past 50 Years?∗ Andrew Gelman† and Aki Vehtari‡ 3 June 2021
    What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years?∗ Andrew Gelmany and Aki Vehtariz 3 June 2021 Abstract We review the most important statistical ideas of the past half century, which we categorize as: counterfactual causal inference, bootstrapping and simulation-based inference, overparameterized models and regularization, Bayesian multilevel models, generic computation algorithms, adaptive decision analysis, robust inference, and exploratory data analysis. We discuss key contributions in these subfields, how they relate to modern computing and big data, and how they might be developed and extended in future decades. The goal of this article is to provoke thought and discussion regarding the larger themes of research in statistics and data science. 1. The most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years A lot has happened in the past half century! The eight ideas reviewed below represent a categorization based on our experiences and reading of the literature and are not listed in chronological order or in order of importance. They are separate concepts capturing different useful and general developments in statistics. The present review is intended to cover the territory and is influenced not just by our own experiences but also by discussions with others; nonetheless we recognize that any short overview will be incomplete, and we welcome further discussions from other perspectives. Each of these ideas has pre-1970 antecedents, both in the theoretical statistics literature and in the practice of various applied fields. But each has developed enough in the past fifty years to have become something new. 1.1. Counterfactual causal inference We begin with a cluster of different ideas that have appeared in statistics, econometrics, psychometrics, epidemiology, and computer science, all revolving around the challenges of causal inference, and all in some way bridging the gap between, on one hand, naive causal interpretation of observational inferences and, on the other, the recognition that correlation does not imply causation.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Page 1 THOMAS JEFFERSON SHARPTON Rank
    THOMAS JEFFERSON SHARPTON Rank: Associate Professor Department: Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University Department of Statistics, Oregon State University Date Hired: October 15, 2013 Address: 226 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 Phone: (541) 737-8623 Email: [email protected] Web: lab.sharpton.org A. EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION Education 2009 Ph.D. Microbiology, Designated Emphasis in Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Dissertation: “Investigations of Natural Genomic Variation in the Fungi” Advisors: John W. Taylor & Sandrine Dudoit 2003 B.S. (Cum Laude) Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Employment history 2019- Associate Professor Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University Department of Statistics, Oregon State University 2016- Founding Director Oregon State University Microbiome Initiative 2013-2019 Assistant Professor Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University Department of Statistics, Oregon State University 2013- Center Investigator Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University 2009-2013 Bioinformatics Fellow Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Gladstone Institutes Advisors: Katherine Pollard & Jonathan Eisen (UC Davis) 2003-2009 Graduate Student Researcher Department of Microbiology, University of California, Berkeley Advisors: John Taylor & Sandrine Dudoit 2005 Bioinformatics Research Intern The Broad Institute Advisor: James Galagan Additional Affiliations 2017-2018 Scientific Advisory Board Member Thomas J. Sharpton – CV Page 1 Resilient Biotics, Inc. B. AWARDS 2019 Phi Kappa Phi Emerging Scholar Award 2018 OSU College of Science Research and Innovation Seed Program Award 2017 OSU College of Science Early Career Impact Award 2014 Finalist: Carter Award in Outstanding & Inspirational Teaching in Science 2013 Gladstone Scientific Leadership Award 2007 Dean’s Council Student Research Representative 2007 Effectiveness in Teaching Award, UC Berkeley 2006-2008 Chang-Lin Tien Graduate Research Fellowship C.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Impact of Digital Repositories
    Measuring the Impact of Digital Repositories February 28-March 1, 2017 Participant Introductions Bruce Ambacher’s career spans four decades at NARA, George Mason University, and the University of Maryland. His responsibilities included service as acting chief of NARA’s digital preservation unit and as court-appointed preservation officer for the PROFS, Iran-Contra, and Clinton email collections. He represented NARA on the Federal Geographic Data Committee and helped develop federal and international geospatial standards. He was NARA’s representative for the OAIS Reference Model. He co-chaired the development of TRAC. He helped develop the trustworthy digital repositories standards ISO 16363 and ISO 16919. He began teaching courses in archives and digital preservation at George Mason University in 1984, became an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland in 2000 and a Visiting Professor between 2007 and 2013. He has consulted on digital preservation for industry and cultural humanities institutions. He is a Research Affiliate of the Digital Curation Innovation Center at the University of Maryland Mary Barlow is head of the Strategic Project Management Office at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), and has oversight of impact reporting and the development of infrastructure business cases. Prior to taking on this role, Mary served as a Programme Manager for the multi-million pound investment in EMBL-EBI by the UK government's Large Facilities Capital Fund. This programme included the construction of new office space and the on-going public procurement of ICT infrastructure to support EMBL-EBI's growing public databases. Mary's work prior to EMBL-EBI focused on ICT integration and intelligent buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CLEVELAN ORCHESTRA California Masterwor S
    ����������������������� �������������� ��������������������������������������������� ������������������������ �������������������������������������� �������� ������������������������������� ��������������������������� ��������������������������������������������������� �������������������� ������������������������������������������������������� �������������������������� ��������������������������������������������� ������������������������ ������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������� ����������������������������� ����� ������������������������������������������������ ���������������� ���������������������������������������� ��������������������������� ���������������������������������������� ��������� ������������������������������������� ���������� ��������������� ������������� ������ ������������� ��������� ������������� ������������������ ��������������� ����������� �������������������������������� ����������������� ����� �������� �������������� ��������� ���������������������� Welcome to the Cleveland Museum of Art The Cleveland Orchestra’s performances in the museum California Masterworks – Program 1 in May 2011 were a milestone event and, according to the Gartner Auditorium, The Cleveland Museum of Art Plain Dealer, among the year’s “high notes” in classical Wednesday evening, May 1, 2013, at 7:30 p.m. music. We are delighted to once again welcome The James Feddeck, conductor Cleveland Orchestra to the Cleveland Museum of Art as this groundbreaking collaboration between two of HENRY COWELL Sinfonietta
    [Show full text]
  • David M. Cutler Edward L. Glaeser Jesse M. Shapiro Working Paper
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHY HAVE AMERICANS BECOME MORE OBESE? David M. Cutler Edward L. Glaeser Jesse M. Shapiro Working Paper 9446 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9446 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2003 We are grateful to Melissa Eccleston, Daniel Michalow, and Vladimir Novakovski, for research assistance, and to the National Institutes on Aging for research support. We thank Gary Becker, Darius Lakdawalla, Tomas Philipson, and seminar participants at Ohio State University and the University of Chicago for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2003 by David M. Cutler, Edward L. Glaeser, and Jesse M. Shapiro. All rights reserved. Short sections of text not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including notice, is given to the source. Why Have Americans Become More Obese? David M. Cutler, Edward L. Glaeser, and Jesse M. Shapiro NBER Working Paper No. 9446 January 2003 JEL No. I1, O3, D1 ABSTRACT Americans have become considerably more obese over the past 25 years. This increase is primarily the result of consuming more calories. The increase in food consumption is itself the result of technological innovations which made it possible for food to be mass prepared far from the point of consumption, and consumed with lower time costs of preparation and cleaning. Price changes are normally beneficial, but may not be if people have self-control problems. This applies to some, but not most, of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Welfare in Insurance Markets Using Variation in Prices∗
    THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Vol. CXXV August 2010 Issue 3 ESTIMATING WELFARE IN INSURANCE MARKETS USING VARIATION IN PRICES∗ LIRAN EINAV AMY FINKELSTEIN MARK R. CULLEN We provide a graphical illustration of how standard consumer and producer theory can be used to quantify the welfare loss associated with inefficient pricing in insurance markets with selection. We then show how this welfare loss can be estimated empirically using identifying variation in the price of insurance. Such variation, together with quantity data, allows us to estimate the demand for insurance. The same variation, together with cost data, allows us to estimate how insurers’ costs vary as market participants endogenously respond to price. The slope of this estimated cost curve provides a direct test for both the existence and the nature of selection, and the combination of demand and cost curves can be used to estimate welfare. We illustrate our approach by applying it to data on employer- provided health insurance from one specific company. We detect adverse selection but estimate that the quantitative welfare implications associated with inefficient pricing in our particular application are small, in both absolute and relative terms. ∗We are grateful to Felicia Bayer, Brenda Barlek, Chance Cassidy, Fran Filpovits, Frank Patrick, and Mike Williams for innumerable conversations ex- plaining the institutional environment of Alcoa, to Colleen Barry, Susan Busch, Linda Cantley, Deron Galusha, James Hill, Sally Vegso, and especially Marty Slade for providing and explaining the data, to Tatyana Deryugina, Sean Klein, Dan Sacks, and James Wang for outstanding research assistance, and to Larry Katz (the Editor), three anonymous referees, Kate Bundorf, Raj Chetty, Peter Dia- mond, Hanming Fang, David Laibson, Jonathan Levin, Erzo Luttmer, Jim Poterba, Dan Silverman, Jonathan Skinner, and numerous seminar participants for help- ful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutional Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure and E-Research
    E-Research and E-Scholarship The Institutional Challenges Cyberinfrastructureof and E-Research cholarly practices across an astoundingly wide range of dis- ciplines have become profoundly and irrevocably changed By Clifford Lynch by the application of advanced information technology. This collection of new and emergent scholarly practices was first widely recognized in the science and engineering disciplines. In the late 1990s, the term e-science (or occasionally, particularly in Asia, cyber-science) began to be used as a shorthand for these new methods and approaches. The United Kingdom launched Sits formal e-science program in 2001.1 In the United States, a multi-year inquiry, having its roots in supercomputing support for the portfolio of science and engineering disciplines funded by the National Science Foundation, culminated in the production of the “Atkins Report” in 2003, though there was considerable delay before NSF began to act program- matically on the report.2 The quantitative social sciences—which are largely part of NSF’s funding purview and which have long traditions of data curation and sharing, as well as the use of high-end statistical com- putation—received more detailed examination in a 2005 NSF report.3 Key leaders in the humanities and qualitative social sciences recognized that IT-driven innovation in those disciplines was also well advanced, though less uniformly adopted (and indeed sometimes controversial). In fact, the humanities continue to showcase some of the most creative and transformative examples of the use of information technology to create new scholarship.4 Based on this recognition of the immense disciplinary scope of the impact of information technology, the more inclusive term e-research (occasionally, e-scholarship) has come into common use, at least in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]