Freedom and the „Creative Act‟ in the Writings of Nikolai Berdiaev: an Evaluation in Light of Jürgen Moltmann‟S Theology of Freedom

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freedom and the „Creative Act‟ in the Writings of Nikolai Berdiaev: an Evaluation in Light of Jürgen Moltmann‟S Theology of Freedom View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS ST. MARY‟S COLLEGE FREEDOM AND THE „CREATIVE ACT‟ IN THE WRITINGS OF NIKOLAI BERDIAEV: AN EVALUATION IN LIGHT OF JÜRGEN MOLTMANN‟S THEOLOGY OF FREEDOM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF DIVINITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY PAUL A. SCARINGI ST. ANDREWS, SCOTLAND SEPTEMBER, 2007 DECLARATIONS I, Paul A. Scaringi, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 100,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. Date: Signature of candidate: I was admitted as a research student in September 2003 and as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in June 2004; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St. Andrews between 2003 and 2007. Date: Signature of candidate: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St. Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date: Signature of supervisor: Date: Signature of supervisor: ii COPYRIGHT In submitting this thesis to the University of St. Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. Date: Signature of candidate: iii To Eileen iv In Memoriam John H. Scaringi April 1929 – May 2006 v Great authors keep repeating themselves. Something profound lies in this. They are working through a few big thoughts and intuitions. These come from the heart; they rise up; and one tries to sound the music in a thousand different ways. It is a thought, a set of thoughts, or one complex thought, that is lived through many years. Jeremy Driscoll, O.S.B., A Monk‟s Alphabet vi CONTENTS Acknowledgments . xi List of Abbreviations . xii Abstract . xiii Chapter 1 – Context, Influences, and Ultimate Questions . 1 §1 Introduction . 1 §2 Nikolai Berdiaev . 2 1. A Biographical Sketch . 2 2. Russian Philosophy . 3 3. The Silver Age . 5 4. Influences . 6 A. Philosophy . 7 B. Theology . 9 C. The Arts . 11 5. Personalism/Existentialism . 12 §3 Jürgen Moltmann . 13 §4 Summary . 15 Chapter 2 – A Vision of Freedom . 16 §1 Introduction . 16 1. Orientation and Style . 18 2. Intuition . 21 3. „Spiritual‟ Experience . 23 §2 The Search for the Origins of Freedom . 24 1. The Mystical Approach . 26 2. Integral Knowledge . 29 3. Symbolism . 31 4. German Mysticism . 35 §3 The Ungrund . 36 §4 Summary . 43 Chapter 3 – Motivations . 45 §1 Introduction . 45 §2 The Justification of God . 46 1. The Legend . 47 2. The Justification of God . 49 vii §3 The Justification of the Person . 53 1. Personality . 54 2. Personality, Incarnation, and Theandric Existence . 56 §4 Summary . 59 Chapter 4 – Freedom within the Created Order . 61 §1 Introduction . 61 §2 Freedom . 62 1. Embodied Freedom . 64 2. The Fall . 68 A. Autonomy . 69 B. Heteronomy . 73 C. Slavery . 76 §3 The God-Man . 77 1. Grace . 78 2. God-manhood and Theosis . 81 3. Theandric Freedom . 84 A. Interrelatedness . 84 B. The Necessity of Autonomy . 85 C. Love . 86 D. Sobornost‟ . 87 §4 Spirit . 90 §5 Summary . 95 Chapter 5 – The Creative Act . 97 §1 Introduction . 97 §2 The Beginning Stages of Creativity . 99 §3 Foundations of the Creative Act . 102 1. Meonic freedom . 102 2. Imago Dei . 103 3. Silent Expectation . 107 §4 The Creative Act in the Material World . 109 1. Inner Creativity . 110 A. Imagination . 112 B. Contemplation . 113 C. Humility . 115 2. Outer Creativity . 117 A. Objectification . 117 B. Transfiguration . 120 C. Realization . 123 D. Ethics . 128 3. Interdependence . 129 §5 Summary . 131 viii Chapter 6 – Jürgen Moltmann‟s Theology of Freedom . 133 §1 Introduction . 133 1. Berdiaev‟s Theological Orientation . 133 2. Moltmann . 135 §2 The Genesis of Freedom . 138 1. Creating Space for Creation . 139 A. Zimzum . 139 B. Love . 140 C. The Question of Passibility . 142 2. Trinity . 144 A. The Triune God . 144 B. Perichoresis . 145 (a) Interpenetration . 146 (b) The „Broad Place‟ of the Trinity . 148 3. The Passion of the Father . 149 4. The Son . 151 A. Bearer of Sin . 152 B. Solidarity . 152 C. The Crucified and Resurrected Liberator . 153 5. The Holy Spirit . 155 A. The Wellspring of Life and Relation . 156 B. The Giver of Freedom . 157 6. Summary . 159 §3 Freedom within the Created Order . 159 1. The Object of Liberation . 160 A. The Human . 160 (a) God‟s Image . 160 (b) The Imago Trinitatis . 163 (c) The Person‟s Relation to the Trinity . 163 B. Nature . 164 2. Freedom „From‟ . 166 A. Freedom from Sin . 166 B. Freedom from Oppression . 168 3. Freedom „For‟ . 170 A. Creativity . 170 B. The „Project‟ of Freedom . 173 4. The Horizon of Freedom . 176 §4 Summary . 177 Chapter 7 – A Critique of Berdiaev in Light of Moltmann . 179 §1 Introduction . 179 §2 Critique, Assessment, and Reconfiguration . 180 1. Methodological Assumptions . 180 2. Bifurcation and the Mystical Approach . 182 3. Spirit . 186 4. Sobornost‟ . 188 ix 5. Justification of the Person . 192 6. Justification of God . 196 7. The Ungrund . 199 8. Embodied Freedom . 203 A. Modality of Existence . 207 B. Subjective-relational . 209 C. Tragedy . 211 9. The „Creative Act‟ . 213 A. Contributions . 214 (a) Interdependence of Creativity and Freedom . 214 (b) Theological Discourse . 215 (c) Positive Freedom . 215 (d) Love . 216 B. The Equivocal Areas within Berdiaev‟s „Creative Act‟ . 217 (a) Materiality . 217 (b) Genius . 220 (c) Basileia . 221 C. A Suggestion . 223 §3 Summary . 225 Chapter 8 – Conclusion . 226 Select Bibliography . 230 x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would not have been able to undertake and complete a project such as this without the support and prayers of family and friends, who, while being too numerous to list, have my sincere gratitude. There are, however, certain individuals I wish to acknowledge who have had a direct impact on this research: Dr. Thomas Graves, Dr. John Kinney, Dr. Stephen Brachlow, and Prof. Jeremy Begbie have all, in rather different and yet important ways, provided guidance, challenge, and support in helping to frame and shape this research. Rev. Dr. Elizabeth Pugh Mills and the community at Grace Baptist Church, Richmond, Virginia provided encouragement and support, both in prayers, communications, and finances to send us overseas. The Very Rev. Robert Gilles and the community at St. Andrews Episcopal Church, St. Andrews made us part of their community and held us in their prayers and kindness. Mrs. Patti Guthrie flawlessly handled the logistics for us to live overseas for four years and made this process manageable. Prof. Michael Partridge gave numerous hours to this project in expertise, productive dialogue, and enthusiastic support. Eileen, my wife, who made this project possible, has been unwavering in her support, steadfast in her love, and the one person who never lost faith that this could be accomplished. xi ABBREVIATIONS Berdiaev: BE The Beginning and the End: Essay on Eschatological Metaphysics BM The Bourgeois Mind and other Studies in Modern Life DM The Destiny of Man DH The Divine and the Human DR Dream and Reality: An Essay in Autobiography DT Dostoevsky EOT The End of Our Time FMW The Fate of Man in the Modern World FS Freedom and the Spirit MCA The Meaning of the Creative Act MH The Meaning of History RI The Russian Idea RSRC The Realm of Spirit and the Realm of Caesar SF Slavery and Freedom SS Solitude and Society SR Spirit and Reality TNE Towards a New Epoch TR Truth and Revelation Moltmann: CG The Crucified God ET Experiences in Theology GC God in Creation GSS God for a Secular Society HG Humanity in God MN Man RRF Religion, Revolution, and the Future SL The Spirit of Life TKG The Trinity and the Kingdom of God TRANSLITERATION The Library of Congress system of transliteration has been used in the spelling of Russian names and words (hence Berdiaev instead of Berdyaev), except with names widely known by other spellings, e.g. Dostoevsky. The New Revised Standard Version has been used for all Biblical quotations. xii ABSTRACT This project revisits the work of Nikolai Berdiaev, one of the first Russian Silver Age religious philosophers to be widely read in the West. The focus of this research is his thought on freedom and the „creative act‟. We will argue that Berdiaev‟s vision of freedom contains two types of freedom – a freedom understood within the created order and a freedom „outside‟ of creation. It will be shown that in the former type, the reader finds a nuanced and insightful multi-layered conception of human freedom, which offers intriguing possibilities for exploring freedom and its implications for humanity. It will also be demonstrated that this type of freedom is closely related to his innovative view of creativity.
Recommended publications
  • Dmitry Uzlaner, Kristina Stoeckl the Legacy of Pitirim Sorokin in The
    Published in: Journal of Classical Sociology 2018, Vol. 18(2) 133 – 153 © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1468795X17740734 Dmitry Uzlaner, Kristina Stoeckl The legacy of Pitirim Sorokin in the transnational alliances of moral conservatives This article examines the legacy of Pitirim A. Sorokin (1889 - 1968), a Harvard sociologist from the Russian emigration . The a uthors scrutini z e Sorokin as one of the nodal point s for today’s moral conservatism . As a scholar, Sorokin has been relegated to the margins of his discipline, but his legacy as a public intellectual has persisted in the United States and has soared in Russia over the last three decades. Th e analysis in this article spans the two poles of reception, the United States and Russia, two countries that have made twenty - first - century moral conservatism a transnational phenomenon . Four aspects of Sorokin’s legacy are especially relevant in this context: his emphasis on values, his notion of the ‘sensate culture’, his ideas about the family, and his vision for moral revival. The a uthors conclude that Sorokin functions as a nodal point that binds together individual actors and ideas across national, cultural and linguistic barriers. The article is based on a firsthand analysis of moral conservative discourse and documents, on qualitative interviews and on scholarly literature. Keywords: Pitirim So rokin, moral conservatism, Russia - US relations, culture war s , transnational conservative alliances. Introduction When Karl Mannheim subtitled his 1925 study on conservatism ‘a contribution to the sociology of knowledge’, he did so in order to emphasis e that he was interested in conservatism as a coherent form of reasoning, a style of thinking ( Denkstil ) born out of a specific historical and sociological constellation.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia Through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises Through Art
    Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises through Art. Understanding Reverse Perspective in Old Russian Iconography by Ihar Maslenikau B.A., Minsk, 1991 Extended Essays Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Ihar Maslenikau 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2015 Approval Name: Ihar Maslenikau Degree: Master of Arts Title: Understanding the Roots of Collectivism and Individualism in Russia through an Exploration of Selected Russian Literature - and - Spiritual Exercises through Art. Understanding of Reverse Perspective in Old Russian Iconography Examining Committee: Chair: Gary McCarron Associate Professor, Dept. of Communication Graduate Chair, Graduate Liberal Studies Program Jerry Zaslove Senior Supervisor Professor Emeritus Humanities and English Heesoon Bai Supervisor Professor Faculty of Education Paul Crowe External Examiner Associate Professor Humanities and Asia-Canada Program Date Defended/Approved: November 25, 2015 ii Abstract The first essay is a sustained reflection on and response to the question of why the notion of collectivism and collective coexistence has been so deeply entrenched in the Russian society and in the Russian psyche and is still pervasive in today's Russia, a quarter of a century after the fall of communism. It examines the development of ideas of collectivism and individualism in Russian society, focusing on the cultural aspects based on the examples of selected works from Russian literature. It also searches for the answers in the philosophical works of Vladimir Solovyov, Nicolas Berdyaev and Vladimir Lossky.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Russian Literaturepart I Russian Literature: Background, Foreground, Creative Cognition
    The Mythopoetic “Vectors” of Russian LiteraturePART I Russian Literature: Background, Foreground, Creative Cognition Chapter 1 The Mythopoetic “Vectors” of 27. Russian Literature1 Any national literature is to some significant extent a mirror held up to its people’s collective countenance: its myths, aspirations, national triumphs and traumas, current ideologies, historical understanding, lin guistic tra- ditions. But it is also more than that — more than a reflection in the glass of what has come before and what is now, even as one glances into it, passing from view. It is, in a real sense, generative of new meaning, and thus capable of shaping that countenance in the future. For the society that takes its literary products seriously, the text of a novel or poem can be a kind of genetic code2 for predicting, not concrete outcomes or actual progeny, but something no less pregnant with future action: the forms of a culture’s historical imagination. The variations seem limitless, and yet how is it we are able to determine any given work of literature is clearly identifiable as Russian? Why could Flaubert’s Emma Bovary in some sense not be imagin- ed by the great realist who created Anna Karenina? How is Dostoevsky’s 1 Originally appeared 2 See Chapter 4 in Part 1 as part 1 of the essay/chapter of the present volume with its “Russian Literature,” in Cambridge discussion of how genes and Companion to Modern Russian “memes” work together to create Culture, ed. Nicholas Rzhevsky an individual’s and a culture’s (Cambridge: Cambridge University views of itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Chaadaev: Between the Love of Fatherland and the Love of Truth
    PETER CHAADAEV: BETWEEN THE LOVE OF FATHERLAND AND THE LOVE OF TRUTH BOOK OF ABSTRACTS International Conference Krakow Meetings 2016 June 5–8, 2016 Benedictine Abbey in Tyniec, Krakow, Poland ORGANIZERS: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow Instituto de Filosofia Edith Stein in Granada International Center for the Study of the Christian Orient in Granada HONORARY PATRONAGE: Council of European Bishops’ Conferences INVITED SPEAKERS: Andrzej Walicki (Warsaw) Bernard Marchadier (Paris) Fr. Georgy Orekhanov (Moscow) Regula Zwahlen (Fribourg) ACADEMIC BOARD: Teresa Obolevitch (Krakow) Artur Mrówczyński-Van Allen (Granada) Paweł Rojek (Krakow) CONFERENCE SECRETARY: Olga Tabatadze (Granada) Gennadii Aliaiev Poltava Yuri Kondratuk National Technical University, Ukraine THE TRUTH OF PATRIOTISM OR THE PATRIOTISM OF THE TRUTH What does it make the inner tension of the title question? It is obvious—at least for rational thinking—that the truth is a predicate that describes the universal, as the patriotism is the one that describes the individual or group. There is only one truth, but there are many pa- triotisms. Within this coordinate system, we should rather talk about the patriotism of the truth: as the universal bears greater value than individual, so, first, one should be a patriot of the truth, and only thereafter a patriot of a group (the group is not necessarily a people, a nation, or a state). The patriotism of the truth is the true patriotism, as it comprises in itself or replaces itself (or subordinates under itself) the patriotism of a group as it is com- monly understood. Thus, we can read and interpret the famous words of Peter Chaadaev that the love of the truth is much more beautiful than the love of the Fatherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Berdyaev's Dialectics of Freedom
    Open Theology 2019; 5: 299–308 Existential and Phenomenological Conceptions of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology Raul-Ovidiu Bodea* Nikolai Berdyaev’s Dialectics of Freedom: In Search for Spiritual Freedom https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0023 Received May 10, 2019; accepted June 21, 2019 Abstract: In Berdyaev’s notion of freedom the borders between theology and philosophy seem to fall down. The same existential concern for spiritual freedom is at the heart of both theology and philosophy. From the point of view of existential philosophy as Berdyaev understands it, only a theologically informed account of freedom, could do justice to the concept of freedom. But a freedom determined by God is not what Berdyaev had in mind as representing authentic freedom. It was necessary for him to reinterpret Jakob Boehme’s concept of Ungrund to arrive at a notion of uncreated freedom that both God and man share. But the articulation of this freedom, and an account of it within our fallen world could only be done as a philosophical pursuit. To arrive at the authentic understanding of spiritual freedom, that is theologically informed, Berdyaev believes that a philosophical rejection of erroneous views of freedom should take place. The articulation of the notion of freedom that does justice to the complexity of the existential situation of both God and man is not for Berdyaev a purpose in itself. The purpose is the arrival at a non-objectified knowledge of freedom that would inform a theologically committed existential attitude. Keywords:
    [Show full text]
  • Interlocutor 2019 KSIAZKA.Indb
    DOI: 10.37240/TI.2018/9.2.2 REVOLUTION AS THE SLEEP OF REASON: THE TOTAL REDUCTION OF IDEAS BY VLADIMIR KANTOR In his article, the author poses the question, one of the most important for understanding the catastrophes of the twentieth century: how and why the sun of mind rolled over the world (as expressed by A. Koestler). The rejection of reason meant the rejection of the Christian pathos of life. Since the end of the nineteenth century, God, light and mind were not in favor across Europe. The light of reason was addressed to all people, but the elect who assimilated it were few. And then the whole history of mankind, we see with what incredible eff ort these chosen mobs pull to the light. In the twentieth century. there was a so-called ‘uprising of the masses’, accompanied by the destruction of Christianity and the elite, carriers of the mind. But this fall in ideas began with the Russian revolution of 1917. In an era when the world of Russia and the West broke, when after two monstrous wars everything was lost, when Auschwitz and Kolyma (where atrocities were happening that are possible only in horrible dreams) erased all the centuries-old attempts of humanism, when the monsters born from sleep of reason seemed to defeat the world forever, there was still a gap. As the Russian philosopher Fyodor Stepun wrote, Christianity called upon all of us, young and old, healthy and sick, rich in talents and poor in spirit, to such a great transfi guration of the world, before which the wildest dreams of a revolutionary reorganization of human life fall apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Outside Russia”: Transnational Mobility, Objects Of
    “RUSSIA OUTSIDE RUSSIA”: TRANSNATIONAL MOBILITY, OBJECTS OF MIGRATION, AND DISCOURSES ON THE LOCUS OF CULTURE AMONGST EDUCATED RUSSIAN MIGRANTS IN PARIS, BERLIN, AND NEW YORK by Gregory Gan A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Anthropology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) February 2019 © Gregory Gan, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: “Russia outside Russia”: Transnational Mobility, Objects of Migration, and Discourses on the Locus of Culture amongst Educated Russian Migrants in Paris, Berlin, and New York submitted by Gregory Gan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology Examining Committee: Dr. Alexia Bloch Supervisor Dr. Leslie Robertson Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Patrick Moore Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Nicola Levell University Examiner Dr. Katherine Bowers University Examiner Prof. Michael Lambek External Examiner ii Abstract This dissertation examines transnational Russian migration between Moscow, Berlin, Paris, and New York. In conversation with forty-five first- and second-generation Russian intellectuals who relocated from Russia and the former Soviet Union, the researcher investigates transnational Russian identity through ethnographic, auto-ethnographic, and visual anthropology methods. Educated migrants from Russia who shared with the researcher a comparable epistemic universe and experiential perspective, and who were themselves experts on migration, discuss what it means to belong to global transnational diasporas, how they position themselves in historical contexts of migration, and what they hope to contribute to modern intellectual migrant narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Berdyaev's Personalism
    International Journal of Orthodox Theology 6:3 (2015) 63 urn:nbn:de:0276-2015-3054 Richard A. Hughes Nikolai Berdyaev’s Personalism Abstract The author portrays Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev as a pioneer in Eastern Orthodox theology with his ideas of freedom and personality. After his deportation from the Soviet Union in 1922, Berdyaev expounded persona- lism in opposition to Western individualism and Marxist collecti- vism. Personality exists in the image and likeness of God, and it culminates in deification. He drew upon the Sobornost’ tradition of Russia and interpreted personality as a communion of love in contrast to reflective self-consciousness of the Augustinian tradition of Western theology. Keywords Richard A. Hughes M. B. Rich Professor of Meonic freedom, personality, Religion at Lycoming Sobornost´, Incarnation, deification College, PA, USA 64 Richard A. Hughes 1 Introduction The aim of this essay is to expound the personalism in the philosophy of Nikolai Berdyaev (1874−1948) and to assess its significance within the context of Orthodox theology. He was a Christian philosopher who considered himself to be a loyal son of the Russian Orthodox Church. In 1894 Berdyaev became a Marxist, and he was active in clandestine revolutionary groups. He believed that Marxism was the only means to overcome the evil of capitalism.1 On 11/12 March 1898 the police rounded up clandestine groups and arrested Berdyaev; he was sentenced to three years exile in Vologda. While in exile, he realized the limitations of Marxism and moved toward
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom from Violence and Lies Essays on Russian Poetry and Music by Simon Karlinsky
    Freedom From Violence and lies essays on russian Poetry and music by simon Karlinsky simon Karlinsky, early 1970s Photograph by Joseph Zimbrolt Ars Rossica Series Editor — David M. Bethea (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Freedom From Violence and lies essays on russian Poetry and music by simon Karlinsky edited by robert P. Hughes, Thomas a. Koster, richard Taruskin Boston 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book as available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-158-6 On the cover: Heinrich Campendonk (1889–1957), Bayerische Landschaft mit Fuhrwerk (ca. 1918). Oil on panel. In Simon Karlinsky’s collection, 1946–2009. © 2012 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013. 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Utopia and Its Negative
    Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century by Matthew Benjamin Cole Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Gillespie, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tom Spragens, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Ruth Grant ___________________________ Malachi Hacohen Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v ABSTRACT Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century by Matthew Benjamin Cole Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Gillespie, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Tom Spragens, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Ruth Grant ___________________________ Malachi Hacohen An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 i v Copyright by Matthew Cole 2017 Abstract My dissertation offers an interpretation of twentieth century political thought which emphasizes the influence of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Drawing examples from philosophy, literature, and social science, I show how negative visions of future society have played an important critical function in our contemporary understanding of freedom, power,
    [Show full text]
  • The Slynx 41 2.1
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Russian Literature 43 Phantoms of a Future Past A Study of Contemporary Russian Anti-Utopian Novels Mattias Ågren ©Mattias Ågren and Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis 2014 Front cover photography: Jack Mikrut, Sochi 2014 Opening Ceremony Courtesy of the Swedish Olympic Committee. ISSN 0346-8496 (Stockholm Studies in Russian Literature) ISBN printed version 978-91-981947-3-9 ISBN electronic version 978-91-981947-2-2 Printed in Sweden by US-AB, Stockholm 2014 Distributor: Stockholm University Library Contents Acknowledgments vii A Note on Transliteration and Translation ix 1. AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY 1 1.1. The Aim of the Thesis 3 1.2. Utopia and Anti-utopia 7 1.3. The Importance of Generic Tradition 8 1.4. Reaction against Utopia: A Confusion of Terminology 11 1.5. Is Utopia Really Dead? 14 1.6. Towards ‘Specialized’ Utopias 17 1.7. Multiple Metanarratives 21 1.8. The Poetics of the Anti-utopian Novel 25 1.8.1. Temporal and Spatial Displacements 26 1.8.2. Metanarratives Manifested through Rituals 31 1.8.3. Between Complicity and Freedom – The Protagonist 34 1.8.4. A Dialogue with Metanarratives 36 2. ANTIUTOPIA ON THE THRESHOLD: TATYANA TOLSTAYA’S THE SLYNX 41 2.1. The Deconstruction of a City-State 47 2.2. Time as a Vicious Circle 53 2.3. The Hero as a Fool 56 2.4. Newspeak or Oldspeak 58 2.5. The Absence of Utopia 59 3. THE RISE OF COMMERCIAL METANARRATIVES: VIKTOR PELEVIN’S GENERATION ‘P’ 67 3.1. The Chronotope of the Computer Game – Digital Displacement 74 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Jozef Matula Svetlana Panich Łukasz Malczak Lesław Sławiński
    © Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie, 2013 ul. Kopernika 26 • 31-501 Kraków Recenzenci Jozef Matula Polacky University Olomouc (Czech Republic) Svetlana Panich The Alexander Solzhenitsyn Memorial House of the Russian Abroad (Moscow, Russia) Wydanie książki sfinansowano po części ze środków na działalność statutową Wydziału Filozoficznego Akademii Ignatianum w Krakowie Redakcja językowa Łukasz Malczak Projekt okładki i stron tytułowych Lesław Sławiński – PHOTODESIGN WYDAWNICTWO WAM ul. Kopernika 26 • 31-501 Kraków tel. 12 62 93 200 • faks 12 42 95 003 e-mail: [email protected] www.wydawnictwowam.pl DZIAŁ HANDLOWY tel. 12 62 93 254-255 • faks 12 62 93 496 e-mail: [email protected] KSIęGARNIA WYSYŁKOWA tel. 12 62 93 260, 12 62 93 446-447 • faks 12 62 93 261 e.wydawnictwowam.pl Drukarnia Wydawnictwa WAM • ul. Kopernika 26 • 31-501 Kraków Contents FOREWORD ............................................................9 PATRISTIC INSPIRATIONS IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE ALEKSEY KAMENSKIKH The Image of the Second Rome through the Prism of the Third ....................13 JANNA VOSKRESSENSKAIA The “Other” Person. The Reception of Russian Neo-Patristics in J. Zizioulas’ Theology . 23 JUSTYNA KROCZAK Saint Theophan the Recluse’s oeuvre and reception of his thought in Poland . .37 RUSSIAN WRITERS IN THE WEST OLGA Khvostova Varngagen von Ense’s reception of Pushkin’s thought and Russia ..................57 SERGEI A. KIbAL’NIK On Dostoyevsky’s Anti-Rationalism, its European Philosophical Parallels and its Followers . 73 Ilya Levyash Semantics of the European Discourse of Dostoyevsky – Nietzsche . .93 MARINA Savel’EVA Dostoyevsky and Thomas Mann on the “Twilight of the German Spirit”............109 JóZEF bREMER Romano Guardini’s interpretation of figures in Fyodor M.
    [Show full text]