Flora Graeca on the European Continent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flora Graeca on the European Continent Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 71(Suppl. 2):109-122. 2019 109 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl. 2).2019-09 Flora Graeca on the European continent H.W. Lack Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany [email protected] ABSTRACT. Flora Graeca is a work in ten folio volumes, published in London between 1806 and 1840. It is based on the botanical collections made by John Sibthorp during his travels in what is now Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Turkey and the pictorial documentation of the plants produced by Ferdinand Bauer. The text was written by James Edward Smith, Robert Brown and John Lindley. Flora Graeca was printed in a tiny edition with the result that many botanists considered it to be non-existent or as only a manuscript. This paper deals with the few copies of Flora Graeca kept today in libraries on the European continent and their historical backgrounds – three in Paris, one in Vienna and Darmstadt respectively, all apparently subscription copies, while the copies in St. Petersburg and Copenhagen were previously owned by Fredrick North, 5th Earl of Guildford, and John Platt. The botanical affiliations of the previous owners, among them Franz I, Emperor of Austria, and Ludwig I, Grand Duke of Hesse, are explained. The libraries on the European continent that have copies of the so-called Bohn reissue of Flora Graeca are listed. Particular attention is given to the Belgrade copy, a hybrid consisting of printed title matter with some of the landscapes copied by hand and the 966 engravings, whereas all text pages, indices and appendices have been written on a type writer. Keywords. Copenhagen copy, Darmstadt copy, Flora Graeca, history of plant taxonomy, Paris copies, St. Petersburg copy, Vienna copy. Introduction When David Mabberley and I met for the first time in August 1983 in Berlin, which was then still infamous for its wall, one of our topics of conversation was the natural history illustrator Ferdinand Bauer (1760–1826). Among many other works, he had produced the 966 watercolours depicting plants which were later published as coloured copper engravings in the exceedingly rare Flora Graeca. Several more meetings followed in Oxford, Kew and elsewhere and many letters were exchanged, which were then still on paper, resulting, after many problems and delays, in the monograph The Flora Graeca Story: Sibthorp, Bauer and Hawkins in the Levant, published by Oxford University Press in 1998 (Lack & Mabberley, 1999). Over the following years an exhibition on this subject was organised in the Bodleian Library in Oxford (Lack, 1999), and further studies appeared on this subject (e.g. Harris, 2007) culminating in four more books — two dealing with the life and work of Ferdinand (Mabberley, 1999, 2017), one with the life and work of his elder brother Franz (1758–1840) (Lack, 2008), and one more comprehensive account of the lives and works of the Bauer brothers, i.e. Joseph 110 Gard. Bull. Singapore 71 (Suppl. 2) 2019 (1756–1831), Franz and Ferdinand, setting them and their numerous productions into the context of their time (Lack, 2016). What was written in these publications on the Flora Graeca project was almost exclusively based on the archival material conserved in Oxford and the copies of the Flora Graeca kept in England. This paper does not paraphrase these earlier findings, nor does it add to them, but it analyses the very few copies of this work kept on the European continent and their varied historical backgrounds. Among these, the copies conserved in Vienna and Copenhagen were of particular importance for the history of the botanical exploration of what is now Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Turkey — regions which in the late eighteenth century by and large belonged to the Ottoman Empire. The following brief outline is mainly based on The Flora Graeca Story (see above). Flora Graeca Flora Graeca is a work in ten folio volumes, published in London between 1806 and 1840 in a total of twenty instalments. Each volume contains title matter (i.e. title page and frontispiece), text and one hundred coloured copper engravings (with the exception of the last volume which has only 66), with indices, appendices, etc. also placed in the final volume. Contrary to our modern concept of a Flora, Flora Graeca does not deal in a comprehensive way with the plant life of the study area, but only with a selection of it — c. 1000 plant species, all observed in the field by John Sibthorp (1758–1796), third Sherardian Professor of botany at Oxford University, in the years 1786–1787 and 1794–1795, including those recorded as pencil drawings by Ferdinand Bauer in 1786–1787. Working in Oxford, Bauer produced a pictorial documentation for the project between 1788 and 1794, including seven frontispieces which served as the basis for the production of the copper engravings (Lack, 1997). Sibthorp, meanwhile, had made no progress with the text for his intended Flora. In his carefully worded, though very unconventional will, Sibthorp left lands in Sutton manor in the county of Oxford to his alma mater Oxford University for the endowment of a chair — but under the condition that the proceeds were first used for a precursor, the Prodromus Florae Graecae, and then for the Flora Graeca, to be published based on the collected materials. Considering the very substantial sums involved, Oxford University accepted the arrangement, but had to wait for 44 years until money was eventually available for the chair. Two facts were of decisive importance for Flora Graeca: firstly, Sibthorp’s stipulation that the work was ‘to consist of ten Folio Volumes each Volume to consist of one Hundred Plates … & I do request of my Executors to find out & nominate some Person well skilled in Botany & Natural History for that Purpose & under whose direction the Plates may be engraved & coloured from the Drawings & MS Notes’ and, secondly, by Sibthorp’s careful choice of his co-executors — John Hawkins (1761–1841), his former travel companion who was to become the organiser of the foundation, Thomas Platt (d. 1842), a prominent solicitor, who would act as administrator of the foundation, and John Wenman (1745– 1796), Regius Professor of Civil Law at Oxford University. Flora Graeca on the European continent 111 The co-executors clearly subscribed to the rigid adherence to Sibthorp’s will and the highest quality of the end product, which meant searching for a competent botanist who they found firstly in James Edward Smith (1759–1828), after his death to be followed briefly by Robert Brown (1773–1858), and finally John Lindley (1799– 1865). The latter’s contribution to Flora Graeca has been admirably analysed by Stearn (1999). In addition, the co-executors had to look for a qualified company capable of engraving the 966 copper plates (plus those for the frontispieces), to produce the prints and have them coloured — an immense labour. They recruited James Sowerby (1757– 1822), later followed by other members of his family to do this job (Henderson, 2015). Last but not least, printers for the text had to be found. All this ensured the particularly high profile of literally every aspect of theFlora Graeca. However, no attempt is made here to analyse again what has already been written on the exceedingly high quality of text and illustrations. However, there was a major financial problem: the proceeds from the Sutton manor were rather too small for Sibthorp’s gigantic project, so that Flora Graeca could only be offered on the basis of a subscription, i.e. money from the subscribers had to be added to the funds from the estate to make the production of the great work possible. Right from the beginning the subscription cost was extravagant, which quite naturally reduced the number of potential buyers to the inner circle of the very rich. The lists of subscribers Two lists of subscribers have survived — one for the fifth fascicle with the following names: ‘[1] Sir J. Banks, [2] Lord Visc. Milton, [3] Col. Sibthorp, [4] J. Hawkins, Esq., [5] Platt, Esq. [6] A. B. Lambert, Esq., [7] Earl Spencer, [8] G. Hibbert, Esq. [9] Earl of Dartmouth, [10] Marquis of Stafford, [11] Prof. Martyn, [12] Mis Sherbrooke, [13] Earl of Bridgewater, [14] Sir M. Cholmeley, [15] Rev. J. Brie, [16] Lord Guildford, [17] Marquess of Bath, [18] Radcliffe Library, [19–21] M. Artaria 3 copies, [22] Sir J. E. Smith?, [23–29] foreign purchasers, [30] Trin. Coll. Library, [31] All Souls, [32] Univ. Cambridge’, and a second list entitled ‘Messrs Payne and Foss’s distribution of the twenty-five perfect copies of the Flora graeca. Folio. — 1. Earl FitzWilliam. — 2. J. Hawkins Esq.re. — 3. Thomas Platt Esq.re. — 4. Earl Spencer. — 5. Geo: Hibbert Esq.re. — 6. Earl of Dartmouth. — 7. Marquis of Bath. — 8. Duke of Sutherland. — 9. Mr. Sowerby. — 10. Rev.d T. Bell. — 11. Mr. Bohn, Henrietta street. — 12–14. Messr. Artaria & Fontain, Manheim, 3 copies. — 15. Messr. Deighton, Cambridge for the University Library. — 16. H. Holland Esq.re. — 17.–19. Mr. Parker, Oxford for Radcliffe Bodleian and Botanical Libraries. — 20. Mr. Rich. Red Lion square. — 21.– 25. Horticultural soc.–Linnean soc.–British museum, London–The Bodleian Library, and the Botanic garden, Oxford (5 copies). Delessert France Grand Duke’ (Lack & Mabberley, 1999). From the second list, only the following subscribers are relevant in our context: Messr. Artaria & Fontain, Mannheim (3 copies), [Benjamin] Delessert, Grand Duke, i.e. Ludwig I, Grand Duke of Hesse and by Rhine, and Thomas Platt and, from the first list, Lord Guildford. 112 Gard. Bull. Singapore 71 (Suppl. 2) 2019 The tiny number of copies produced resulted in a simple fact, very appropriately worded by the great bibliographer Georg August Pritzel (1814–1874) ‘Das Werk [die Flora Graeca] ist von vielen Botanikern als gar nicht existent oder als Manuskript betrachtet worden’ [The work [the Flora Graeca] was regarded by many botanists as non-existent or as a manuscript] (Pritzel, 1847a).
Recommended publications
  • A Biographical Index of British and Irish Botanists
    L Biographical Index of British and Irish Botanists. TTTEN & BOULGER, A BIOaEAPHICAL INDEX OF BKITISH AND IRISH BOTANISTS. BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF BRITISH AND IRISH BOTANISTS COMPILED BY JAMES BEITTEN, F.L.S. SENIOR ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, BBITISH MUSEUM AKD G. S. BOULGEE, E.L. S., F. G. S. PROFESSOR OF BOTANY, CITY OF LONDON COLLEGE LONDON WEST, NEWMAN & CO 54 HATTON GARDEN 1893 LONDON PRINTED BY WEST, NEWMAN AND HATTON GAEDEN PEEFACE. A FEW words of explanation as to the object and scope of this Index may fitly appear as an introduction to the work. It is intended mainly as a guide to further information, and not as a bibliography or biography. We have been liberal in including all who have in any way contributed to the literature of Botany, who have made scientific collections of plants, or have otherwise assisted directly in the progress of Botany, exclusive of pure Horticulture. We have not, as a rule, included those who were merely patrons of workers, or those known only as contributing small details to a local Flora. Where known, the name is followed by the years of birth and death, which, when uncertain, are marked with a ? or c. [circa) ; or merely approximate dates of "flourishing" are given. Then follows the place and day of bu'th and death, and the place of burial ; a brief indication of social position or occupation, espe- cially in the cases of artisan botanists and of professional collectors; chief university degrees, or other titles or offices held, and dates of election to the Linnean and Eoyal Societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No
    Newsletter No. 167 June 2016 Price: $5.00 AUSTRALASIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Darren Crayn Daniel Murphy Australian Tropical Herbarium (ATH) Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria James Cook University, Cairns Campus Birdwood Avenue PO Box 6811, Cairns Qld 4870 Melbourne, Vic. 3004 Australia Australia Tel: (+61)/(0)7 4232 1859 Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 9252 2377 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Leon Perrie John Clarkson Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 467, Wellington 6011 PO Box 975, Atherton Qld 4883 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+64)/(0) 4 381 7261 Tel: (+61)/(0) 7 4091 8170 Email: [email protected] Mobile: (+61)/(0) 437 732 487 Councillor Email: [email protected] Jennifer Tate Councillor Institute of Fundamental Sciences Mike Bayly Massey University School of Botany Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010 New Zealand Australia Tel: (+64)/(0) 6 356- 099 ext. 84718 Tel: (+61)/(0) 3 8344 5055 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other constitutional bodies Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Affiliate Society David Glenny Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Sarah Matthews Heidi Meudt Advisory Standing Committees Joanne Birch Financial Katharina Schulte Patrick Brownsey Murray Henwood David Cantrill Chair: Dan Murphy, Vice President Bob Hill Grant application closing dates Ad hoc adviser to Committee: Bruce Evans Hansjörg Eichler Research
    [Show full text]
  • Global Affinities: the Natural Method and Anomalous Plants in the Nineteenth Century Lorelai Kury
    HoST - Journal of History of Science and Technology Vol. 15, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 39-70 10.2478/host-2021-0003 SPECIAL ISSUE GLOBAL FLORA: MASTERING EXOTIC PLANTS (EIGHTEENTH—NINETEENTH CENTURIES) Global Affinities: The Natural Method and Anomalous Plants in the Nineteenth Century Lorelai Kury Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Brazil [email protected] Sara Albuquerque IHC-Nova FCSH, Pólo Universidade de Évora, Portugal [email protected] Abstract: Approaching from an analysis of the work of Robert Brown (1773-1858) and Friedrich Welwitsch (1806-1872) on Rafflesiaand Welwitschia, this article explores how the “natural method” became a tool for understanding extra-European flora in the nineteenth century. As botanists worked to detect “hidden affinities” between plants that would enable them to identify the so-called natural families to which even anomalous species belonged, they relied on comparison as their basic methodological procedure, making it essential for them to have access to collections. In their scientific writings, professional botanists tended to steer clear of any emphasis on plant exoticism. While botany engaged in dialogue with various types of approaches, the field essentially normalized the exotic. The article’s exploration of the hermetic style of scientific texts and the way botanists incorporated illustrators’ work sheds light on the complexity of the spaces where natural history was done, in a context where plants were circulating from around the globe. Keywords: Rafflesia; Welwitschia; Robert Brown; natural method; exoticism © 2021 Lorelai Kury, Sara Albuquerque. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Options for the Risk Management of Bushfires in the Blue Mountains A
    A FIERY DEBATE—PUTTING ANGER ON THE BACKBURNER "Snow and sleet are falling on two bushfires burning in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney." ABC Radio news, 15 November 2006. Spoken without a trace of irony, the words of the newsreader encapsulate the extraordinary, and sometimes perversely unpredictable, nature of life in this landscape forged by fire. The Grose Valley holds a special place in the hearts of Australia’s conservationists, being the site of the first great victory for the movement in Australia in 1931-32—but it would not be as we know and love it if it were not occasionally shrouded in smoke rather than mist. However, coming after a long period of drought and amidst dire warnings that Australia is facing an even hotter and drier future, the most recent fire in the Grose Valley has reignited an increasingly heated debate over fire management practices, both within the local community and further afield. (As a result of these concerns, the Blue Mountains World Heritage Institute hosted a forum on the Grose Valley fire in February, the outcomes of which are discussed on page 3.) So with bushfires predicted to increase in both frequency and intensity, how do we protect people and property whilst preserving the biological integrity of the World Heritage Area? How well do we understand the ecological responses to fire? Are we managing fire risk in the most appropriate way for both the community and the environment? The Blue Mountains Conservation Society has organised a meeting to examine these issues—come and hear five experts in fire management and ecology give their views, with the opportunity for questions and discussion afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 27 NO. 1 PP 54366200018 FEBRUARY 2003 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT Bodo Jensen COMMITTEE Thelma Bridle Peter McCauley Malcolm Guy David Pettifor EDITOR: TREASURER David Hirst Iris Freeman 14 Beaverdale Avenue Windsor Gardens SA 5087 Telephone 8261 7998 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Illustration and Photography: a Southern Hemisphere Perspective
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2017, 30, 291–325 LAS Johnson Review https://doi.org/10.1071/SB16059 Botanical illustration and photography: a southern hemisphere perspective Ellen J. Hickman A,C, Colin J. Yates B and Stephen D. Hopper A ACentre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management and School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Albany, WA 6330, Australia. BScience Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. To examine claims that the role of botanical art in systematic botany is diminishing because of advances in photography, this review considers relevant literature and includes a quantitative analysis of trends in modern journals, monographs and floras. Our focus is on southern hemisphere systematic botany because, relative to the northern hemisphere, this is poorly represented in modern reviews of botanical art and photography. An analysis of all digitally available papers in Nuytsia, the Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Garden, Muelleria, Telopea, Austrobaileya and Systematic Botany established that, although photographic illustrations have increased since 2000, botanical illustrations have not always diminished. The cause of these trends is unknown, but it is likely to be due to several factors, including sourcing funding for production of botanical illustration, editorial preference for the use of illustrations or photographs, author preference for either illustrations or photographs, and moving to online publication, with no charges for colour reproduction. Moreover, the inclusion of botanical artists as co-authors in some scientific publications signals an ongoing and important role. Botanical illustration brings sharp focus and meticulous attention to detail regarding form and structure of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Collection of FLORA GRAECA Sibthorpiana : FROM
    SIBBALDIA: 171 The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, No. 10 LIVING COLLECTION OF FLORA GRAECA SIBTHORPIANA: FROM THE FOLIOS OF THE MONUMENTAL EDITION TO THE BEDS OF A BOTANIC GARDEN IN GREECE Sophia Rhizopoulou1, Alexander Lykos2, Pinelopi Delipetrou3 & Irene Vallianatou4 ABstrAct The results of a survey of vascular plants illustrated in the 19th-century publication Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana (FGS) and grown in Diomedes Botanic Garden (DBG) in Athens metropolitan area in Greece reveal a total number of 274 taxa belonging to 67 families, using the Raunkiaer system of categorising plants by life form (Raunkiaer, 1934). Therophytes dominate with 36 per cent, while hemicryptophytes, chamephytes and geophytes follow with 16 per cent, 14 per cent and 14 per cent respectively. In terms of life cycle, 60 per cent are perennials, 36 per cent annuals and 4 per cent other growth forms adapted to environmental disturbance. Although anthropo- genic pressures and environmental stresses have caused loss of habitat and resulted in profound landscape transformation in the eastern Mediterranean, DBG contributes to the maintenance of approximately one-third of the plants collected in territories of the Levant in 1787. This living collection constitutes an important testimony to the scientific value, heritage and plant diversity described in FGS. Statistics are provided comparing the plants collected and illustrated for FGS and those now growing in DBG. IntroDuctIon Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana (Sibthorp and Smith, 1806–1840) is considered by many to be the most splendid and expensive flora ever produced and was printed in ten folio volumes between 1806 and 1840 (Stearn, 1967; Lack & Mabberley, 1999; Harris, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections to Phytotaxa 222: Some Nomenclatural Adjustments and Typifications for Almond Species in the Genus Prunus Sensu Lato (Rosaceae)
    Phytotaxa 234 (1): 098–099 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Correspondence ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.234.1.9 Corrections to Phytotaxa 222: Some nomenclatural adjustments and typifications for almond species in the genus Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae) SASHA W. EISENMAN Temple University, Department of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, 201 Dixon Hall, 580 Meetinghouse Road, Ambler, PA 19002 USA; email: [email protected] Following the publication of Some nomenclatural adjustments and typifications for almond species in the genus Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae) (Eisenman 2015), two necessary corrections were brought to my attention. Correction 1 Prunus graeca (Lindl. in Sibthorp & Lindley 1840: 71) Eisenman (2015: 189) is an illegitimate, later homonym of Prunus graeca Desfontaines ex Steudel (1840: 331) and, therefore requires a replacement name. Prunus lindleyi Eisenman, nom. nov. Basionym:—Amygdalus graeca Lindl. in Sibthorp & Lindley (1840: 71). Blocking name: Prunus graeca Desf. ex Steud. (1840: 331). Neotype (designated by Eisenman 2015):—Without locality, s.d., s.coll., s.n. [“Amygdalus incana. J. Sibthorp, M.D. Flora Graeca. t477. Prodromus Fl. Graecae Vol I p. 337 n 1136”]. Herbarium Webbianum, ex Herb. Desfontaines”] (OXF! [digital image]) Note:—The species Amygdalus incana Pallas (1784: 13) was originally included in Flora Graeca Prodromus (Vol.1:337–338 [Sibthorp & Smith 1809]; species 1136), and the later Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana (Vol 5:61–62 [Sibthorp & Smith 1825]; Tabula 477). The entries for A. incana in these works reference Pallas’ Flora Rossica, as well as Willdenow’s Species Plantarum (vol.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNTIA a Journal of Botanical History
    HUNTIA A Journal of botanical History VolUme 14 NUmber 1 2009 Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation Carnegie mellon University Pittsburgh The Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation, a research division of Carnegie mellon University, specializes in the history of botany and all aspects of plant science and serves the international scientific community through research and documentation. To this end, the Institute acquires and maintains authoritative collections of books, plant images, manuscripts, portraits and data files, and provides publications and other modes of information service. The Institute meets the reference needs of botanists, biologists, historians, conservationists, librarians, bibliographers and the public at large, especially those concerned with any aspect of the North American flora. Huntia publishes articles on all aspects of the history of botany, including exploration, art, literature, biography, iconography and bibliography. The journal is published irregularly in one or more numbers per volume of approximately 200 pages by the Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation. external contributions to Huntia are welcomed. Page charges have been eliminated. All manuscripts are subject to external peer review. before submitting manuscripts for consideration, please review the “Guidelines for Contributors” on our Web site. Direct editorial correspondence to the editor. Send books for announcement or review to the book reviews and Announcements editor. The subscription rate is $60.00 per volume. Send orders for subscriptions and back issues to the Institute. Hunt Institute Associates may elect to receive Huntia as a benefit of membership; contact the Institute for more information. Hunt Institute for botanical Documentation Carnegie mellon University 5th Floor, Hunt library 4909 Frew Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Telephone: 412-268-2434 email: [email protected] Web site: http://huntbot.andrew.cmu.edu/ HIbD/Publications/HI-Pubs/Pub-Huntia.shtml editor and layout Scarlett T.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots to Seeds Exhibition Large Print Captions
    LARGE PRINT CAPTIONS ROOTS TO SEEDS 400 YEARS OF OXFORD BOTANY PLEASE RETURN AFTER USE Curator’s audio guide Listen to Professor Stephen Harris explore highlights from the exhibition. To access the audio guide, use your mobile device to log in to ‘Weston-Public-WiFi’. Once connected, you can scan the QR code in each case, or go to visit.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/rootsaudio To listen to the exhibition introduction scan this QR code You are welcome to use your device with or without headphones. Plants are essential to all aspects of our lives. They feed, clothe and shelter us, and provide us with drugs, medicine and the oxygen we need to survive. Moreover, they have key roles in resolving current global problems such as food security, environmental change and sustainable development. This summer marks the anniversary of the foundation of the Oxford Botanic Garden, in 1621, and offers an opportunity to reflect on four centuries of botanical research and teaching in the University. Botany in Oxford, as we will see in this exhibition, has not enjoyed steady growth. Activity has been patchy; long periods of relative torpor, punctuated by bursts of intensely productive activity. The professors and researchers who have worked in Oxford have contributed to startling advances in our knowledge of plants, but they also found themselves held back by circumstance – their own, the societies in which they lived, or by the culture of the University. The roots of Oxford botany are in its collections of specimens and books, which remain central to modern teaching and research.
    [Show full text]
  • British Contribution to the Exploration of the Cyprus Flora
    British contribution to the exploration of the Cyprus flora Seminar contribution to the module "Terrestrial Ecosystems" (2101-230) Institute of Botany (210a) · University of Hohenheim · Stuttgart presented by Tim Götz on January 15, 2019 Structure British science Early accounts of Cypriot flora Meikle‘s Flora of Cyprus Viney and the North Cyprus Herbarium 03.02 2 British science Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge The Royal Society was founded in 1660 at the Gresham College in London. It’s mission has been to recognise, promote, and support excellence in science and to encourage the development and use of science for the benefit of humanity. Illustration of the Gresham College in London [1]. 03.03 3 British science The British Empire: The Empire covered a massive territory encompassing a wide diversity of landscapes and ecosystems. Many British scientists spent their lives exploring all of these different regions. Cyprus was included from 1878 to 1960. The British Empire at maximum extent in 1921 [2]. 03.04 4 British science Cyprus botanically relevant for the following reasons: As an island Cyprus is geographically isolated. Cyprus is located within the Mediterranean climate zone. Cyprus contains multiple Altitudinal zones. These factors make the flora of Cyprus especially unique within the British Empire. Satellite image of Cyprus [3]. 03.05 5 Early accounts of the Cypriot flora John Sibthorp J. Sibthorp was born in Oxford in 1758, where he studied for his bachelor‘s degree at Lincoln College. Quite early on his career he showed great interest in plants and by the ripe age of 25 he was granted professorship, the Sherardian Chair of Botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Plant Systematics
    Oxford Plant Systematics With news from Oxford University Herbaria (OXF and FHO), Department of Plant Sciences, Oxford OPS 15 May 2008 Details from watercolours and sketches made by Ferdinand Bauer for Sibthorp and Smith’s Flora Graeca . Ophrys tenthredinifera (top) and Hypericum olympicum (bottom). Foreword Contents This year OPS once again reflects the breadth of systematic activity being carried out within the Department of Plant Sciences. Foreword From a Darwin project in Bolivia, student reports covering plants in Argentina, Robert Scotland …………………………………………………………. 2 Bolivia, Peru, Brazil, a published book on the history of Flora Graeca , and a short News items ..................................................................................................... 2 piece covering Rosemary and Serena's visit to Gotland in Sweden following in the New Darwin Project in Bolivia footsteps of Linnaeus. In addition, Mike John Wood ……………………………………………………………… 3 Hopkins provides an interesting insight into databasing Brazilian herbaria, which Publications 2007 …………………………………………………………. 4 includes using a simple and inexpensive system in conjunction with BRAHMS 6 to collect specimen data from the herbaria in Student reports Oxford that can be utilized in Brazil. Denis Systematics of Amicia (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) and plant Filer also provides a useful update on recent diversification and endemism in Andean seasonally dry tropical developments in BRAHMS. I hope you forests enjoy reading OPS 15. Tiina Sarkinen ………………………………………….….…………… 4 Robert Scotland Ecological setting and the evolution of Neotropical plants: origins and University Reader in Systematic Botany diversification of the Cerrado flora Marcelo Simon …………………………………….……….…………... 5 News items Sibthorp, Bauer and the Flora Graeca Stephen A. Harris ………………………………………….…………… 7 We are pleased to report that Rosemary Flora Graeca online Wise , Departmental Botanical Artist, has not yet retired and is still illustrating plants Roger Mills …………………………………………………..………….
    [Show full text]