January 2002 Airport Statistics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

January 2002 Airport Statistics DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC FEBRUARY 2009 FEBRUARY YEAR TO DATE % OF % OF % GRAND % GRAND INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL INCR./ INCR./ TOTAL 2009 2008 DECR. DECR. 2009 2009 2008 DECR. DECR. 2009 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 35,103 36,257 (1,154) -3.2% 75.3% 72,997 73,864 (867) -1.2% 75.2% Air Taxi 11,261 12,760 (1,499) -11.7% 24.2% 23,484 25,982 (2,498) -9.6% 24.2% Military 14 14 0 0.0% 0.0% 37 19 18 94.7% 0.0% General Aviation 224 379 (155) -40.9% 0.5% 550 792 (242) -30.6% 0.6% TOTAL 46,602 49,410 (2,808) -5.7% 100.0% 97,068 100,657 (3,589) -3.6% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) Internationals (3) In 84,024 92,295 (8,271) -9.0% 169,054 191,902 (22,848) -11.9% Out 82,809 91,211 (8,402) -9.2% 166,898 183,981 (17,083) -9.3% TOTAL 166,833 183,506 (16,673) -9.1% 4.7% 335,952 375,883 (39,931) -10.6% 4.7% Majors (4) In 1,382,020 1,479,355 (97,335) -6.6% 2,815,774 2,906,096 (90,322) -3.1% Out 1,385,818 1,475,108 (89,290) -6.1% 2,849,746 2,951,610 (101,864) -3.5% TOTAL 2,767,838 2,954,463 (186,625) -6.3% 78.6% 5,665,520 5,857,706 (192,186) -3.3% 78.8% Nationals (5) In 20,572 23,953 (3,381) -14.1% 43,604 46,486 (2,882) -6.2% Out 19,999 22,748 (2,749) -12.1% 43,885 45,449 (1,564) -3.4% TOTAL 40,571 46,701 (6,130) -13.1% 1.2% 87,489 91,935 (4,446) -4.8% 1.2% Regionals (6) In 273,142 325,302 (52,160) -16.0% 552,481 636,473 (83,992) -13.2% Out 272,347 322,813 (50,466) -15.6% 548,331 630,583 (82,252) -13.0% TOTAL 545,489 648,115 (102,626) -15.8% 15.5% 1,100,812 1,267,056 (166,244) -13.1% 15.3% Supplementals (7) In 547 778 (231) -29.7% 814 1,266 (452) -35.7% Out 340 799 (459) -57.4% 710 1,344 (634) -47.2% TOTAL 887 1,577 (690) -43.8% 0.0% 1,524 2,610 (1,086) -41.6% 0.0% GRAND TOTAL PASSENGERS 3,521,618 3,834,362 (312,744) -8.2% 100.0% 7,191,297 7,595,190 (403,893) -5.3% 100.0% CARGO BY TYPE (LBS) (8) AIR MAIL In 1,055,168 1,173,998 (118,830) -10.1% 2,299,662 2,463,798 (164,136) -6.7% Out 805,477 1,830,392 (1,024,915) -56.0% 1,745,676 2,493,695 (748,019) -30.0% TOTAL 1,860,645 3,004,390 (1,143,745) -38.1% 5.2% 4,045,338 4,957,493 (912,155) -18.4% 5.3% FREIGHT & EXPRESS In 18,131,896 23,867,699 (5,735,803) -24.0% 38,491,832 49,061,924 (10,570,092) -21.5% Out 15,733,310 18,547,712 (2,814,402) -15.2% 33,243,631 39,140,625 (5,896,994) -15.1% TOTAL 33,865,206 42,415,411 (8,550,205) -20.2% 94.8% 71,735,463 88,202,549 (16,467,086) -18.7% 94.7% CARGO BY CARRIER CARGO 28,369,887 37,123,553 (8,753,666) -23.6% 79.4% 60,244,002 76,835,102 (16,591,100) -21.6% 79.5% PASSENGER 7,355,964 8,296,248 (940,284) -11.3% 20.6% 15,536,799 16,324,940 (788,141) -4.8% 20.5% GRAND TOTAL 35,725,851 45,419,801 (9,693,950) -21.3% 100.0% 75,780,801 93,160,042 (17,379,241) -18.7% 100.0% CARGO (1) An aircraft operation is either a landing or takeoff or contact with the control tower (as reported by FAA). (2) Revenue and non revenue passengers as reported by the individual airlines. (3) AeroMexico, Air Canada, Air Wisconsin Int'l, Allegiant Air Int'l, American Trans Air Int'l, British Airways, Champion Int'l, Frontier Int'l, Horizon/F9X Int'l, Lufthansa, Mexicana, (3) Miami Air Int'l, Republic Airline/F9X Int'l, Ryan Int'l Airlines Int'l, Shuttle America/UAX Int'l, SkyWest/UAX Int'l, Ted Int'l, and United Int'l.. (4) Alaska, America West, American, Continental, Delta, Frontier, Northwest, Southwest, Ted, United, and US Airways. Note: Frontier was re-classified to Major effective January 26, 2007. (5) Air Wisconsin/UAX, Air Tran, American Trans Air, Frontier, Jet Blue, Midwest Express, and Spirit. (6) Air Midwest/Mesa, ASA/Delta Connection, Big Sky Airlines, Chautauqua/AA Connection, Chautauqua/CO Express, Chautauqua/UAX, Comair/Delta Connection, (6) Continental Express, ExpressJet/CO Express, ExpressJet/DLX, GoJet/UAX, Great Lakes, Horizon, Horizon/Frontier JetExpress, Mesa/America West Express, Mesa/UAX, (6) Mesa/US Air Express, Mesaba Airlines, Pinnacle Northwest Airlines, Republic/Frontier Express, Shuttle America/UAX,Southern Skyways, (6) SkyWest/DLX, SkyWest/UAX, Trans States/AA, and Trans States/UAX. (7) Allegiant Air, Casino, Champion Air, Hooters Air (dba Pace), Kalitta Air, Miami, Ryan Int'l Airlines, and Sun Country. (8) For Detail see Attached Cargo Report. DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL PASSENGERS BY AIRLINE FEBRUARY 2009 FEBRUARY 2009 vs. 2008 YEAR TO DATE % % INCREASE/ INCR./ MKT SHARE MKT SHARE INCREASE/ INCR./ AIRLINE (1) 2009 2008 DECREASE DECR. 2009 2009 2008 2008 DECREASE DECR. AIR CANADA 11,530 15,207 (3,677) -24.2% 24,194 0.34% 29,367 0.39% (5,173) -17.6% AERO MEXICO 4,786 0 4,786 100.0% 7,272 0.10% 0 0.00% 7,272 100.0% AIR TRAN 21,075 21,842 (767) -3.5% 44,876 0.62% 40,258 0.53% 4,618 11.5% ALASKA 27,226 35,204 (7,978) -22.7% 55,993 0.78% 69,872 0.92% (13,879) -19.9% ALLEGIANT AIR 195 491 (296) -60.3% 486 0.01% 741 0.01% (255) -34.4% AMERICAN 100,549 129,903 (29,354) -22.6% 222,017 3.09% 267,238 3.52% (45,221) -16.9% AMERICAN TRANS AIR 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 130 0.00% (130) -100.0% AMERICAN TRANS AIR INT'L 0 231 (231) -100.0% 0 0.00% 461 0.01% (461) -100.0% BIG SKY AIRLINES 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 352 0.00% (352) -100.0% BRITISH AIRWAYS 12,200 13,714 (1,514) -11.0% 25,639 0.36% 27,642 0.36% (2,003) -7.2% CASINO 355 404 (49) -12.1% 355 0.00% 404 0.01% (49) -12.1% CHAMPION AIR INT'L 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 2,002 0.03% (2,002) -100.0% COMAIR/DELTA CONNECTION 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 335 0.00% (335) -100.0% CONTINENTAL 72,082 81,094 (9,012) -11.1% 149,824 2.08% 167,764 2.21% (17,940) -10.7% DELTA 88,085 87,697 388 0.4% 190,385 2.65% 173,394 2.28% 16,991 9.8% EXPRESS JET/CONTINENTAL EXPRESS 100 2,810 (2,710) -96.4% 150 0.00% 4,702 0.06% (4,552) -96.8% EXPRESS JET/DELTA CNX 0 7,619 (7,619) -100.0% 0 0.00% 16,367 0.22% (16,367) -100.0% FRONTIER AIRLINES 699,052 774,102 (75,050) -9.7% 1,423,136 19.79% 1,532,374 20.18% (109,238) -7.1% FRONTIER (INT'L) 39,532 45,760 (6,228) -13.6% 80,202 1.12% 97,658 1.29% (17,456) -17.9% GO JET/UAX 13,421 15,659 (2,238) -14.3% 28,678 0.40% 27,295 0.36% 1,383 5.1% GREAT LAKES 29,816 43,394 (13,578) -31.3% 62,300 0.87% 85,498 1.13% (23,198) -27.1% HORIZON 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 461 0.01% (461) -100.0% JET BLUE 13,906 17,139 (3,233) -18.9% 30,174 0.42% 35,929 0.47% (5,755) -16.0% LUFTHANSA 13,469 24,658 (11,189) -45.4% 30,527 0.42% 50,881 0.67% (20,354) -40.0% LYNX AVIATION 69,093 63,940 5,153 8.1% 134,580 1.87% 119,545 1.57% 15,035 12.6% MESA/UAX 61,827 56,361 5,466 9.7% 115,287 1.60% 113,989 1.50% 1,298 1.1% MESA/US AIR EXPRESS 976 6,616 (5,640) -85.2% 2,021 0.03% 13,474 0.18% (11,453) -85.0% MESABA AIRLINES 9,173 0 9,173 100.0% 16,141 0.22% 0 0.00% 16,141 100.0% MESABA/DELTA CONNECTION 2,705 0 2,705 100.0% 2,705 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,705 100.0% MEXICANA 5,401 6,315 (914) -14.5% 11,696 0.16% 13,415 0.18% (1,719) -12.8% MIAMI AIRLINES 0 0 0 0.0% 209 0.00% 45 0.00% 164 364.4% MIAMI AIRLINES INT'L 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 48 0.00% (48) -100.0% MIDWEST EXPRESS 5,590 7,720 (2,130) -27.6% 12,439 0.17% 15,618 0.21% (3,179) -20.4% NORTHWEST 58,664 81,643 (22,979) -28.1% 126,009 1.75% 168,305 2.22% (42,296) -25.1% PINNACLE NORTHWEST AIRLINES 0 0 0 0.0% 1,096 0.02% 0 0.00% 1,096 100.0% REPUBLIC AIRLINE/FRONTIER EXPRESS 0 74,515 (74,515) -100.0% 0 0.00% 132,422 1.74% (132,422) -100.0% REPUBLIC AIRLINE/F9X INT'L 0 1,700 (1,700) -100.0% 0 0.00% 5,133 0.07% (5,133) -100.0% SHUTTLE AMERICA/UAX 39,244 25,980 13,264 51.1% 82,199 1.14% 56,425 0.74% 25,774 45.7% SHUTTLE AMERICA/UAX (INT'L) 12,567 7,828 4,739 60.5% 25,374 0.35% 11,082 0.15% 14,292 129.0% SKYWEST/DELTA CONNECTION 15,281 18,442 (3,161) -17.1% 35,500 0.49% 36,316 0.48% (816) -2.2% SKYWEST/UAX 294,695 315,258 (20,563) -6.5% 603,050 8.39% 625,949 8.24% (22,899) -3.7% SKYWEST/UAX INT'L 19,894 15,951 3,943 24.7% 37,330 0.52% 34,357 0.45% 2,973 8.7% SOUTHWEST 465,993 252,168 213,825 84.8% 927,767 12.90% 502,088 6.61% 425,679 84.8% SUN COUNTRY 337 682 (345) -50.6% 474 0.01% 1,420 0.02% (946) -66.6% TED 0 280,883 (280,883) -100.0% 0 0.00% 558,435 7.35% (558,435) -100.0% TED INT'L 0 17,718 (17,718) -100.0% 0 0.00% 34,088 0.45% (34,088) -100.0% TRANS STATES/AA 0 4,689 (4,689) -100.0% 0 0.00% 9,325 0.12% (9,325) -100.0% TRANS STATES/UAX 9,158 12,832 (3,674) -28.6% 17,105 0.24% 24,601 0.32% (7,496) -30.5% UNITED 1,183,427 1,164,367 19,060 1.6% 2,415,095 33.58% 2,279,882 30.02% 135,213 5.9% UNITED INT'L 47,454 34,424 13,030 37.9% 93,718 1.30% 69,749 0.92% 23,969 34.4% US AIRWAYS 72,760 67,402 5,358 7.9% 155,294 2.16% 138,354 1.82% 16,940 12.2% TOTALS 3,521,618 3,834,362 (312,744) -8.2% 7,191,297 100.00% 7,595,190 100.00% (403,893) -5.3% DEPLANED PASSENGERS 1,760,305 1,921,683 (161,378) -8.4% 3,581,727 3,782,223 (200,496) -5.3% ENPLANED PASSENGERS 1,761,313 1,912,679 (151,366) -7.9% 3,609,570 3,812,967 (203,397) -5.3% TOTAL PASSENGERS 3,521,618 3,834,362 (312,744) -8.2% 7,191,297 7,595,190 (403,893) -5.3% (1) Passenger totals represent revenue and nonrevenue passengers as reported by the individual airlines.
Recommended publications
  • APR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Apr-09 Apr-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 2,417 2,177 11.0% 10,631 10,861 -2.1% American/American Connection 14,126 14,749 -4.2% 55,394 60,259 -8.1% Continental/Cont Express (a) 5,808 5,165 12.4% 22,544 23,049 -2.2% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,222 8,620 -16.2% 27,007 37,838 -28.6% ExpressJet Airlines 0 5,275 N/A 0 21,647 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,888 2,874 N/A 23,531 2,874 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 120 N/A 0 4,793 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,882 6,920 -43.9% 12,864 22,030 -41.6% US Airways (d) 6,301 6,570 -4.1% 25,665 29,462 -12.9% United/United Express (e) 23,359 25,845 -9.6% 89,499 97,355 -8.1% Total 70,003 78,315 -10.6% 267,135 310,168 -13.9% Charters Other Charters 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total enplaned passengers 70,123 78,315 -10.5% 267,544 310,732 -13.9% Total deplaned passengers 71,061 79,522 -10.6% 263,922 306,475 -13.9% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • MAR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Mar-09 Mar-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 3,436 3,735 -8.0% 8,214 8,684 -5.4% American/American Connection 15,900 15,873 0.2% 41,268 45,510 -9.3% Continental/Cont Express (a) 6,084 6,159 -1.2% 16,736 17,884 -6.4% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,041 10,498 -32.9% 19,785 29,218 -32.3% ExpressJet Airlines 0 6,444 N/A 0 16,372 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,492 0 N/A 16,643 0 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 2,046 N/A 0 4,673 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,983 6,773 -41.2% 8,982 15,110 -40.6% US Airways (d) 7,001 7,294 -4.0% 19,364 22,892 -15.4% United/United Express (e) 24,980 26,201 -4.7% 66,140 71,510 -7.5% Total 74,917 85,023 -11.9% 197,132 231,853 -15.0% Charters Other Charters 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total enplaned passengers 75,067 85,211 -11.9% 197,421 232,417 -15.1% Total deplaned passengers 72,030 82,129 -12.3% 192,861 226,953 -15.0% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Air Transportation
    University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Journal of Air Transportation About the Journal Editorial Board Panel of Reviewers Volumes Submission Guidelines Author Index Order Form Sorenson Best Paper Award Journal of Air Transportation VOLUME 8, NUMBER 2--2003 University of Nebraska at Omaha 6001 Dodge Street ISSN: 1544-6980 Omaha, NE 68182 Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 (402) 554-3424 University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute About the Journal of Air Transportation THE JOURNAL Development The Journal of Air Transportation (JAT) mission is to provide the global community Scope immediate key resource information in all Dissemination areas of air transportation. Our goal is to be recognized as the preeminent scholarly Organizations journal in the aeronautical aspects of transportation. As an international and Editors interdisciplinary journal, the JAT provides a forum for peer-reviewed articles in all areas Personnel of aviation and space transportation research, policy, theory, case study, practice, and issues. While maintaining a broad scope, a key focal point of the journal is in the area of aviation administration and policy. ISSN: 1544-6980 Exit Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 Return University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Development The JAT was conceptualized to fulfill an international void of scholarly publications in this area as identified by the primary organizers. It is envisioned that aviation leaders will utilize the JAT as a key decision-making tool. Scholarly rigor and standards will be uncompromised with regular evaluation by the Editorial Board and Panel of Reviewers. Return ISSN: 1544-6980 Exit Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Scope The JAT will accept manuscripts on all topics that relate to air transportation, both technical and non-technical.
    [Show full text]
  • Saab 340 the VERSATILE TURBOPROP Saab 340 > the Versatile TURBOPROP
    SAAB 340 THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP 2 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP ”WE ARE A NICHE MARKET operator...THE SAAB 340 IS A WORKHORSE AIRCRAFT AND very RELIABLE.” GEORG POMMER ROBIN HOOD Aviation CEO THE FLEXIBLE PERFORMER To safeguard against today’s rapidly changing environment and improve profitability, successful airlines must choose an aircraft that minimizes risk and is adaptable to an ever-changing market environment. In addition, passengers demand comfort and service similar to that offered by major carriers. The Saab 340 is a favorite among airline passengers due to its flexibility, comfort and reliable performance. With about half the operating costs of a regional jet, the Saab 340 can offer service in a variety of markets, large or small. RELIABILITY IN A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS The cost-effective Saab 340 consistently generates profits for a wide range of regional air transport services. With the right blend of technologies, the Saab 340 combines high productivity with dependability. THE “FACTS” @ 4Q – 2009 • 25-year track record • best selling 30-seat turboprop • more than 410 operational aircraft found on six continents and in 30 countries • over 13 million hours flown and an estimated 250 million passengers • consistent 99% dispatch reliability • award winning customer support services 3 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP THE BIG AIRLINE CHOICE 4 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP WORLD’S LARGEST 340BPLUS OPERATOR ”...OUR OVERALL OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE A SEAMLESS The red, white and blue Delta livery is replacing Northwest colors service PRODUCT TO OUR on all aircraft and airport signage as the newly merged airline is passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry
    Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kerria Measkhan Tan, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Economics The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Matthew Lewis, Advisor James Peck Huanxing Yang c Copyright by Kerria Measkhan Tan 2012 Abstract In my first dissertation essay, \Incumbent Response to Entry by Low-Cost Carri- ers in the U.S. Airline Industry," I analyze the price response of incumbents to entry by low-cost carriers in the U.S. airline industry. Previous theoretical papers suggest that airlines might respond to entry by lowering prices to compete harder for existing customers or they might increase prices to exploit their brand-loyal customers. This paper tests which effect is more prominent in the airline industry. I find that when one of four low-cost carriers enters a particular route, legacy carrier incumbents respond differently than low-cost carrier incumbents to new low-cost carrier entry. Legacy carriers decrease their mean airfare, 10th percentile airfare, and 90th percentile air- fare before and after entry by a low-cost carrier. However, low-cost carriers do not significantly alter their pricing strategy. The differing incumbent responses can be attributed to the finding that low-cost carrier entrants tend to match the price set by rival low-cost carriers in the quarter of entry and tend to enter with a lower price than that of legacy carrier incumbents. The results also suggest that entry does not affect price dispersion by incumbent carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers
    Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 11,518 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 0 AERO CALIFORNIA 1 AERODYNAMICS, INC. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 0 AEROMEXICO 1 AEROPOSTAL ALAS DE VENEZUEL 3 AEROSVIT UKRANIAN AIRLINES 0 AIR ATLANTA EUROPE 16 AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC 0 AIR CANADA 248 AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 AIR CHINA 1 AIR COMET S.A. 0 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS 0 AIR FRANCE 30 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 1 AIR JAPAN, CO 0 AIR LUXOR 0 AIR NEW ZEALAND 3 AIR PACIFIC, LTD. 0 AIR TAHITI NUI 1 AIR TRANSAT 17 AIR WISCONSIN 132 AIR-INDIA 4 AIRTRAN 87 ALASKA AIRLINES 215 ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIA 10 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO. 0 ALLEGIANT 5 ALOHA AIRLINES 7 AMERICA WEST 536 AMERICAN AIRLINES 2061 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 171 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 3 ATA 94 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES 191 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 27 AVIACSA AIRLINES 3 AVIATION CONCEPTS 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDING LIMITED 5 BOSTON-MAINE AIRWAYS 8 BRITANNIA AIRWAYS LTD. 147 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 165 BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD 16 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS 1 CASINO EXPRESS 1 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD 8 CHAMPION AIR 7 CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC 67 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD 3 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 0 COMAIR 301 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACI 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA (COPA) 3 CONDOR FLUGDIENST 0 CONTINENTAL 398 CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA 3 CZECH AIRLINES 2 DELTA AIR LINES 1326 EGYPTAIR 0 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 66 EMIRATES AIRLINE 4 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 0 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES 11 FALCON AIR EXPRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2 Jeffrey A
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Flightlines Newsletter Department of Aviation Spring 1994 Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2 Jeffrey A. Johnson St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/avia_news Part of the Other Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Jeffrey A., "Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2" (1994). Flightlines Newsletter. 1. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/avia_news/1 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Aviation at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Flightlines Newsletter by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vol. 2 #2 St. Cloud State University Aviation Department HH216 720 S 4th Ave St. Cloud, MN 56301-4498 http:/www.stcloud.msus.edu/aviation Spring 1994 CAA SITE VISIT address changes should contact the Aviation faculty. The Council on Aviation Accreditation (CAA) Site v isit Team chaired by Dr. Tom Connolly, Embry Riddle B727 PROCEDURES COURSE Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, visited the The B727 Procedures course was taught for the first time SCSU Aviation program May 1-3, 1994. Additional team during Spring 1994. The course concentrates on the use of members were Dr. Tim Brady, Central Missouri State SMAC (Standard Maneuvers and Configurations), SOPA University, and Mr. Roland Desjardins, Vice President of (Standard Operating Procedures-Amplified) and flows, using Commercial Operations, American Airlines. Mr. Gary mock-up panels which were provided by Northwest Kiteley, CAA Executive Director, accompanied the Site Visit Aerospace Training Corporation (NATCO).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information Accounting and Reporting Directive
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION No. 304 A Issue Date: 02-01-12 Effective Date: 1-1-2012 Part: 241 Section: 04 AIR CARRIER GROUPINGS This revised 2012 Accounting and Reporting Directive is to show the merger of ExpressJet Airlines and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, along with updates the reporting groups for filing the Form 41 report during calendar year 2012. From our review, we updated the carrier groupings as follows: AIR CARRIER NEW REPORTING GROUP Kalitta Air LLC Group III Gulf & Caribbean Cargo Group I - $20 million to $100 million Kalitta Charters II Group I - $20 million to $100 million Tradewinds Airlines Group I - $20 million to $100 million Carriers are grouped according to the operating revenue boundaries contained in Section 04 of Part 241. The current reporting levels are: Group III Over $1 billion Group II Over $100 million to $1 billion Group I $100 million and under Subgroups: Group I - $20 million to $100 million Group I - Under $20 million Changes in the reporting groups will become effective January 1, 2012. Any questions regarding the groupings should be directed to [email protected]. Anne Y. Suissa Director Airline Information Attachment ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 OF 3 GROUP III AIR CARRIERS - 18 CARRIER Air Tran Alaska Airlines American Airlines American Eagle Astar * Atlas Air Delta Air Lines Federal Express Frontier Airlines Hawaiian Airlines Jet Blue Kalitta Air LLC SkyWest Southwest Airlines United Airlines (merger with Continental effective 1/1/2012) UPS USAirways World Airways * * Reporting in Group III by waiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Airline Service Differ Significantly for Smaller Communities, but Limited Data on Ancillary Fees Hinders Further Analysis
    Changes in Airline Service Differ Significantly for Smaller Communities, but Limited Data on Ancillary Fees Hinders Further Analysis Report No. EC2020036 May 27, 2020 Changes in Airline Service Differ Significantly for Smaller Communities, but Limited Data on Ancillary Fees Hinders Further Analysis Self-initiated Office of the Secretary | EC2020036 | May 27, 2020 What We Looked At In 2013 and 2014, reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) documented a disproportionate decline in commercial air service to smaller communities. Since that time, there have been concerns that small- and medium-sized communities continue to have limited access to the National Airspace System. The lack of a recent analysis, as well as major changes in the industry, prompted our office to update the GAO and MIT reports. Accordingly, our objective for this self-initiated audit was to detail recent trends in the aviation industry, particularly as they relate to small- and medium-sized communities. What We Found Compared to larger metropolitan areas, smaller communities have experienced disparate effects from several recent aviation industry trends. For example, departures declined in larger communities by roughly 12 percent and in smaller communities by about 34 percent. Connectivity—the ability to connect to and move throughout the national air system—declined by 16 percent in smaller communities, double the rate in larger communities; however, data limitations hindered our analysis of delays and cancellations. Similarly, competitive conditions improved in larger communities, but grew worse in smaller communities, where the cost to fly was also greater. Finally, we found that some airlines have dramatically increased their revenues from booking charges and other ancillary fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook
    Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook Small Community Air Service Development empowering pacific northwest communities Northwest Regional Air Service Initiative Handbook These materials are sponsored by Oregon Department of Aviation Washington Department of Transportation – Aviation Oregon Airport Management Association Washington Airport Management Association US Department of Transportation © Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2006 Table of contents Section 1 Section 4 An overview of the Northwest Regional Airline types and their potential for air Air Service Initiative (NWRASI) service development Introduction . 1 Legacy airlines . 11 Background . 1 Low-cost airlines . 12 NWRASI goals . 2 Select airlines . 13 NWRASI plan . 2 Regional airlines . 13 Phase I . Small Community Air Service Other airlines . 14 Development Tool Kit . 2 Summary of main points . 14 Phase II . Small Community Air Service Market Analysis . 3 Section 5 Phase III . Oregon–Washington Small The importance of airline partnerships Community Air Service Strategies . 3 Marketing Agreements . 15 Summary of main points . 3 Codeshares and their role . 15 Interline Agreements . 16 Section 2 Contract and at-risk agreements . 16 Air service contributions to economy and lifestyle Summary of main points . 17 Contribution to the overall economy . 5 Contribution to local businesses . 6 Section 6 Contribution to quality of life . 6 Kinds of aircraft and their fit with small communities Summary of main points . 6 Aircraft economics . 19 Matching aircraft to markets . 20 Section 3 Jet versus turboprop orders and replacements . 20 e v i Industry status and impact on air service t Regional airline fleet trends . 21 a i An industry struggling financially . 7 t i Service providers and aircraft . 21 n I The 9-11 hangover .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Meeting Attendees
    Appendix C: Meeting Attendees Fifth Federal Aviation Administration Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection 19 - 20 June 1991 The Work Environment in Aviation Maintenance MEETING ATTENDEES Lt. Francis X. Amsler, USAF ASD/SDCE WPAFB, OH 45433 (513) 255-5015 Brad Baker, Technical Training Director, Mesaba Airlines, 7501 26th Avenue, South Minneapolis, MN 55450 1-800-777-6013 Bonnie Bennett, Honeywell Systems and Research Center, 3660 Technology Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55418 (612) 782-7381 Georgette Buch, Ph.D., Transport Canada Aviation (AARE), Place de Ville Tower C Ottowa, Ontario Canada K1A0N8 (613) 990-1049 Robert Bureau, AirBus Industry, Aerofomation Avenue Pierre LaTaecoere 31700 Blagnac, FRANCE Richard J. Campbell, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Room Number 578, New York University, New York, NY 10003 (212) 998-7811 Michael A. Campion, Ph.D., Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 (317) 494-5909 David Cann, FAA Flight Standards, District Office 19, One Thorn Run Center, 1187 Thorn Run Road, Coraopolis, PA 15108 (412) 644-5450 Jag Chawla, Maintenance Programs & Reliability, British Airways Engineering Viscount House Annex (E87), P. O. Box 10 - Heathrow Airport, Hounslow-Middlesex TW6 21A London, ENGLAND 081-562- 5183 Raymond Chelberg, Director, Airworthiness/Chief Engineer, Mail Stop C8800, Northwest Airlines, 5101 Northwest Drive, St. Paul, MN 55111-3034 (612) 726-2954 Diane G. Christensen, BioTechnology, Inc., 405 N. Washington Street, Suite 203, Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 534-8200 Robert Clinkscales, Flagship Airlines, 5700 NW 36th Street, Bldg. 1040, Miami, FL 33122 (305) 526- 1973 John Cox, Airline Pilots' Association, Thorn Run Extension, Pittsburgh, PA 15231 Roy L.
    [Show full text]