High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-Route Effects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-Route Effects HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square July 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 X56 E [email protected] SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 www.gov.uk/hs2 HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects July 2015 SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 Copyright © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2015, except where otherwise stated. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full via the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre. SES and AP2 ES Volume 4 – Off-route effects Contents Structure of the Supplementary Environmental Statement and the Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement 1 1 Introduction 3 1.2 Terminology used to describe the scheme 3 1.3 Purpose of this report 4 1.4 Structure of this report 5 2 Proposed Heathrow Express depot, Langley (AP2-000-001) 7 2.1 Reason for the revision to the scheme 7 2.2 Overview of the area 7 2.3 Description of the AP2 revised scheme 14 2.4 Alternatives 17 2.5 Construction of the AP2 revised scheme 19 2.6 Construction waste and material resources 29 2.7 System testing and commissioning 30 2.8 Construction programme 31 2.9 Operation of the AP2 revised scheme 33 2.10 Operational waste and material resources 33 2.11 Scope of the environmental assessment 33 2.12 Agriculture, forestry and soils 33 2.13 Air quality 37 2.14 Community 41 2.15 Cultural heritage 44 2.16 Ecology 51 2.17 Land quality 58 2.18 Landscape and visual assessment 74 2.19 Socio-economics 86 2.20 Sound, noise and vibration 90 2.21 Traffic and transport 98 2.22 Water resources and flood risk assessment 106 3 Modifications to the West Coast Main Line between Lichfield and Colwich 119 3.1 Summary of amendments 119 3.2 Assessment of amendments 119 i SES and AP2 ES Volume 4 – Off-route effects 3.3 Summary of new or different likely residual significant effects 125 4 References 126 List of figures Figure 1: Locations of off-route stations and depots included in the main ES and SES and AP2 ES 6 Figure 2: Area context map 11 Figure 3: Schematic of construction compounds for civil engineering works 27 Figure 4: Schematic of construction compounds for railway installation works 28 Figure 5: Construction programme 32 Figure 6: Business sector composition in Slough, South Buckinghamshire and the South East 86 Figure 7: Employment by industrial sector in Slough, South Buckinghamshire and the South East 87 List of tables Table 1: Estimated construction, demolition and excavation waste quantities 29 Table 2: Protected and/or notable species 54 Table 3: Summary of receptors for land quality effects 63 Table 4: Summary of baseline CSM for sites which may pose a contaminative risk for the proposed HEx depot scheme 66 Table 5: Summary of temporary (construction) effects 68 Table 6: Summary of permanent (construction) effects 71 Table 7: Train flows and speeds 92 Table 8: New or different significant direct adverse effects on residential communities. 95 Table 9: Surface water features potentially affected by the revised scheme 108 Table 10: Summary of geology and hydrogeology in the study area 109 Table 11: Summary of amendments to the WCML modifications between Lichfield and Colwich 119 Table 12: Assessment of construction noise at individual properties (outside of residential community areas) 121 ii SES and AP2 ES Volume 4 – Off-route effects Structure of the Supplementary Environmental Statement and the Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement The Supplementary Environmental Statement (SES) and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement (AP2 ES) comprises: • non-technical summary (NTS). This provides a summary in non-technical language of the SES (Part 1) and AP2 ES (Part 2) and of any likely significant environmental effects, both beneficial and adverse, which are new or different to those reported in the High Speed Two (HS2) Phase One Environmental Statement (ES) submitted to Parliament in November 2013 in support of the hybrid Bill (‘the Bill’) for Phase One of HS2 (hereafter referred to as ‘the main ES’) and, where relevant, the AP ES submitted in September 2014 (hereafter referred to as ‘the AP1 ES’); • Volume 1: introduction to the SES and AP2 ES. This introduces the supplementary environmental information included within the SES and amendments which have resulted in the need to amend the Bill within the AP2 ES. It also explains any changes to the scope, methodology, assumptions and limitations required for the environmental impact assessment; • Volume 2: community forum area (CFA) reports and map books. These describe the supplementary environmental information included within the SES (Part 1), amendments within the AP2 ES (Part 2) and any new or different likely significant environmental effects arising from these changes in each CFA compared to those reported in the main ES and, where relevant, the AP1 ES. The main local alternatives that have been considered are described, where relevant; • Volume 3: route-wide effects. This describes new or different likely significant route-wide effects arising from the supplementary environmental information and design changes included within the SES (Part 1) and amendments within the AP2 ES (Part 2) compared to those reported in the main ES and, where relevant, the AP1 ES; • Volume 4: off-route effects. This describes new or different likely significant off- route effects arising from the amendments within the AP2 ES, such as the relocation of the Heathrow Express (HEx) depot to Langley in Slough, compared to those reported in the main ES and, where relevant, the AP1 ES; • Volume 5: appendices and map books. This contains supporting environmental information and associated maps; and 1 SES and AP2 ES Volume 4 – Off-route effects • glossary of terms and list of abbreviations. This contains any new or different terms and abbreviations used throughout the SES and the AP2 ES compared to those included in the main ES and the AP1 ES. 2 SES and AP2 ES Volume 4 – Off-route effects 1 Introduction 1.1.1 The hybrid Bill for High Speed Rail between London and the West Midlands (‘the Bill’) was submitted to Parliament together with an Environmental Statement (ES) in November 2013 (‘the main ES’). If enacted by Parliament, the Bill will provide the powers to construct, operate and maintain Phase One of High Speed Two (HS2). This phase of HS2 will provide a new north-south railway between London, Birmingham and the West Midlands. Phase Two of HS2 will comprise new lines between the West Midlands, Leeds and Manchester, completing what is known as the ‘Y network’. Phase Two is not the subject of this document. 1.1.2 Since the deposit of the Bill for Phase One of HS2, a number of amendments to the scheme were identified as a result of further discussions with landowners and occupiers (including through the Parliamentary petitioning process), design refinements, and the requirements of utility undertakers. These amendments were assessed and any new or different likely significant environmental effects were reported in the Additional Provision Environmental Statement (‘the AP1 ES’), published in September 2014. The AP1 ES was deposited in Parliament at the same time as the Bill amendments. 1.1.3 None of the amendments in AP1 related to off-route areas and therefore off-route effects were scoped out of that assessment. There was no Volume 4 included within the AP1 ES. 1.1.4 Since deposit of AP1 in September 2014, the need for further design changes and amendments has arisen following on-going discussions with petitioners, key stakeholders, and as a result of design refinements. New environmental information has also become available. Any new or different significant environmental effects that are likely to result from these proposed changes, new environmental information and amendments are reported in the Supplementary Environmental Statement (SES) and the Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement (‘the AP2 ES’). The SES reports on further environmental information, changes to the scheme assumptions and changes relating the existing Bill powers and limits, whereas the AP2 ES reports on the likely significant environmental effects of the latest additional provisions to the Bill. The SES and the AP2 ES are therefore separate environmental statements, but have been produced as combined volumes. 1.1.5 Both the SES and the AP2 ES provide an update to the main ES and AP1 ES, they should be read in conjunction with them. 1.1.6 None of the SES design changes are likely to generate new or different significant off- route environmental effects, and therefore are scoped out of this assessment.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 25 Route Window W2 Canal Way
    Chapter 25 Route window W2 Canal Way Transport for London PORTOBELLO JUNCTION lies adjacent to the Eurostar North Pole depot. To the northeast, beyond the Paddington Branch of 25 Route window W2 the Grand Union Canal are situated commercial uses and gas works. To the north of the canal lies Canal Way the expanse of open space of St Mary’s and Kensal Green cemeteries. 25.6 Access to sites within railway land is from Canal Way, Barlby Road, St. Ervans Road, Elkstone Road and Great Western Road (by bus depot). The permanent works 25.7 All works will take place within the existing railway corridor, with materials taken to and from Transport the works by rail. for London Worksite assessment 25.8 No significant traffic or transport impacts have been identified that are associated with the works in this route window. Mitigation and temporary impacts 25.9 There are no significant traffic and transport impacts to report, so no mitigation is required. Mitigation and permanent impacts Introduction 25.10 There are no significant permanent impacts to report, so no mitigation is required. 25.1 The four tracks in the Great Western Main Line corridor currently increase to six at Ladbroke Grove (in Route Window W1). In order to provide space for a reversing facility at Westbourne Park this four-six track widening location will need to be moved eastwards to Subway Junction, east of Westbourne Park. The remaining two (northern) tracks between Ladbroke Grove and Westbourne Park will be used by Crossrail for movement of empty stock between Old Oak Common depot and the Westbourne Park train reversing facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Note: Development That Should Have Been Assessed As Part of the Cumulative Assessment
    th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Joint Note: Development that should have been assessed as part of the cumulative assessment Statement on behalf of: LB Hillingdon, Slough BC, South Bucks DC and Bucks CC. 1. Project 1: Western Rail Link to Heathrow th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Highways England Comment 1.1 The Western Rail Link to Heathrow proposal it not yet either a committed project nor is it the subject of a live application. Its details and effects are not yet known. 1.2 The proposal was announced on 5 February 2014 following consideration of four options by Network Rail. At the time the assessment for the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway scheme (the "Scheme") was undertaken, the proposal was at “early stages of development” following its inclusion in the Route Utilisation Strategies published in March 2010. As such, it was not at a sufficiently developed stage to be included in the cumulative assessment for the Scheme and did not come within the guidelines set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (“DMRB”) for those committed, reasonably foreseeable developments that should be included in an assessment. It is understood that an application may be brought forward in due course. Any application for the construction of the Western Rail Link will be required to take the M4 Scheme into account when assessing the effect of its proposals, rather than the reverse. 1.3 Network Rail submitted a Scoping Report (Environmental Impact Assessment – Scoping Report, Western Rail Link to Heathrow, Jacobs, April 2015) to the Planning Inspectorate in April 2015 that set the principles of the proposed approach to the construction of the relocated depot.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands)
    IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2013-14 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) P E T I T I O N Against the Bill – Praying to be heard by counsel, &c. __________ TO THE HONOURABLE THE COMMONS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED. THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA SHEWETH as follows: 1. A Bill (hereinafter called “the Bill”) has been introduced into and is now pending in your honourable House intituled “A Bill to Make provision for a railway between Euston in London and a junction with the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre in Staffordshire, with a spur from Old Oak Common in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a junction with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link at York Way in the London Borough of Islington and a spur from Water Orton in Warwickshire to Curzon Street in Birmingham; and for connected purposes”. 2. The Bill is presented by Mr Secretary McLoughlin, supported by the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Theresa May, Secretary 1 Vince Cable, Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, Secretary Eric Pickles, Secretary Owen Paterson, Secretary Edward Davey, and Mr Robert Goodwill. 3. Clauses 1 to 36 set out the Bill’s objectives in relation to the construction and operation of the railway mentioned in paragraph 1 above. They include provision for the construction of works, highways and road traffic matters, the compulsory acquisition of land and other provisions relating to the use of land, planning permission, heritage issues, trees and noise.
    [Show full text]
  • VALP Modelling
    VALP Modelling BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report TN02 | 2 30/05/19 BCC NE B ucks Loc al Plan T ests -Tec hnical Report BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report VALP Modelling Project No: BRJ10150 Document Title: NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Document No.: TN02 Revision: 2 Date: 30/05/19 Client Name: BCC Client No: BCC Project Manager: Mily Parveen Author: Catherine Hill File Name: M:\Transport Modelling\BRJ10150 VALP Model Runs\Technical Work\Reports\Countywide modelling report\Countywide Modelling Report- VALP 290519.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited NONE www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 28/02/19 Draft CH TW MP 1 09/04/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP 2 30/05/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP TN02 1 NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Scope of study ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Cuttings Meridian Cuttings
    MeridianMeridian CuttingsCuttings Issue No. 004 Spring 2013 The newsletter of the North & East and South London branches of The Inland Waterways Association Campaigning for the conservation, use, maintenance, restoration and development of the Inland Waterways - 1 - elcome to the Spring edition of Meridian Cuttings - although Spring seems as far away as when I was writing the last editorial in December. In preparation for our trip from Audlem, in Cheshire, to Canalway Cavalcade at WLittle Venice (see page 12) Alan and I had our boat, Tickety Boo, de winterised in mid March. Having spent two weekends attempting some paint patching in howling winds and blizzards we’re very much hoping the weather improves soon. We’re very excited about our trip and, at the last count, we’ll be amongst 148 other boats assembling for the 30th year of Cavalcade. Why not put in a couple of hours helping - there are lots of interesting things to do - give Libby a ring and she’ll give you some details. In preparation for the better weather waterside there are towpath walks you can join - take a look at the programme on page 8, and lots of opportunities to help smarten up a waterway near you - see Alison Smedley’s message on page 16, the C&RT Taskforce Diary on page 18, and the Wandle Community River Cleanups programme on page 22. There are lots of other snippets for you - some views of Deptford you may not have seen on page 15, Ian Shacklock’s concerns about the threat to Holborn Studios under the Eagle Wharf Regeneration scheme on page 9 and an update on the judgement against British Waterways (C&RT) also on page 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Union Canal Cruise from Iver | UK Canal Boating
    UK Canal Boating Telephone : 01395 443545 UK Canal Boating Email : [email protected] Escape with a canal boating holiday! Booking Office : PO Box 57, Budleigh Salterton. Devon. EX9 7ZN. England. Grand Union Canal cruise from Iver Cruise this route from : Iver View the latest version of this pdf Grand-Union-Canal-cruise-from-Iver-Cruising-Route.html Cruising Days : 15.00 to 15.00 Cruising Time : 67.00 Total Distance : 108.00 Number of Locks : 138 Number of Tunnels : 0 Number of Aqueducts : 0 A leisurely cruise along the Grand Union Canal from Buckinghamshire through Hertfordshire to Bedfordshire in this 2 weeks cruising route passing through some delightful towns like Hemel Hempstead which is a well planned new town with excellent shops built around a charming old town with attractive streets. Also Berkhamsted is a market town with buildings of all periods. There are also the ruins of a Norman castle where William 1 received the offer of the English crown in 1066. Berkhamsted lies on the western edge of Hertfordshire, bordering the Chiltern Hills. Together with the adjoining village of Northchurch it is separated from other towns and villages by lovely countryside, all of it in the Metropolitan Green Belt and much of it classified as being an area of outstanding natural beauty. Leighton Buzzard is a picturesque market town with 17 and 18th century half timbered houses in the streets acround the Market Cross which has stood for over 600 years in the centre of the town. There is a steam railway in the town , and Whipsnade Zoo is a short taxi ride away, its a sprawling, 600-acre home to more than 2500 animals, with tours, & adventure play areas Milton Keynes has a lot to offer , it is one of the major shopping areas around this area, and is great for the more adventurous where you can toboggan on real snow, and where you can go indoor sky-diving.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • R.B.K.C. Corporate Templates
    HS2 Growth Task Force – The Challenge Response from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham The local authorities welcome HS2 Limited’s revised delivery role to make High Speed 2 an engine for growth. They are pleased to be able to provide the following response that identifies specific opportunities for the development of land at and around the proposed Old Oak Common HS2 / Crossrail station, and demonstrates how these opportunities can be realised to maximise local economic growth. The authorities would also like to draw attention to how the design and development of Old Oak Common station can best support regional development, how parts of this development can be delivered in advance of HS2, and highlight an opportunity to achieve a capital return on the North Pole Depot which is owned by the Department for Transport. This response identifies the opportunity for 92,000 jobs and 22,500 new homes. However, without the outlined changes to current HS2 proposals half the new homes and a quarter of the new jobs will not be created and redevelopment of Kensal Canalside Opportunity Area will be effectively sterilised. Connecting markets, businesses and people Question 1: Do cities have visions and strategic plans to maximise growth from HS2? 1.1 In central west London an Opportunity Area Planning Framework for Old Oak Common is being produced by LB Hammersmith & Fulham (LBHF), LB Brent and LB Ealing in partnership with the Mayor of London and Transport for London (TfL). This envisages the area becoming London’s next Canary Wharf scale development.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement Officer Map
    - Enforcement Officer Map SCALE Key 0 10 20 Mls 1. Northwest Waterways 2. Northeast Waterways 3. Manchester & Pennine Waterways Key Enforcement Contact Details 4. East Midlands Waterways Officer 5. North Wales & Borders Waterways 07766992939 A Mike Fletcher 01942 405758 6. Central Shires Waterways [email protected] 7. South Wales & Severn Waterways 07920283688 B Claire Mara 03030 404040 8. West Midlands Waterways [email protected] 9. South East Waterways 07880138637 10. Kennet & Avon Waterways C Victoria Cluer 03030 404040 [email protected] 11. London Waterways 07827843583 D Jamie Redfern 03030 404040 [email protected] Managed by Canal & River Trust 07887626862 E Stuart Garner 01636 675717 [email protected] N A M E Canal & River Trust Offices 07710175412 F Steve Cropper 03030 404040 [email protected] Waterway Boundaries 07879884828 G Dave Tomkinson 01782 215597 Valid On 14th May 2015 [email protected] © Crown copyright and database rights, 2015, Ordnance Survey 100030994 07879694870 H Angela Barnett 03030 404040 [email protected] Newcastle 07803885578 Carlisle I Jim Smith 03030 404040 [email protected] 07771379377 Durham J Annette Vaughan 03030 404040 [email protected] 07710175242 Middlesbrough K Elizabeth Sollars 03030 404040 [email protected] TEES NAVIGATION 07747460693 AND BARRAGE L George Dickinson 01908 681276 1 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Volume 2 (Appendices) (Part 3)
    PINEWOOD STUDIOS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND FIVE POINTS ROUNDABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 2 (APPENDICES) (PART 3) DOCUMENT NUMBER February 2013 Eiii ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT APPENDIX 13.1 Economic context A1.1 Introduction 1. This socio-economic baseline has been established through the analysis of the change over time of a range of applicable socio-economic indicators. The change over time within each area of impact has been compared. 2. Ward-level, Beaconsfield Constituency, Local Authority and LEP data are not available for every indicator group. A1.2 Economic output and productivity 3. In 2009 Buckinghamshire generated some £10,945 million of GVA, representing 6.1% of the GVA generated across the South East of England. Between 2005 and 2009, GVA in Buckinghamshire increased by 7.1%, although this was below the UK national rate of 12.5% over the same period. Figure 1 shows the change in GVA per head. Figure 1: Change in GVA per head (1999-2009) (current basic prices) 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 GVA perGVA head (£) 17,000 15,000 13,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 UK Buckinghamshire Source: ONS headline GVA per head by NUTS3 area A1.3 Population 4. Figure 2 shows the indexed change in total population over the 2001-2010 period. During this period, the total population of the PSA increased by 8.0%, compared with increases of 9.0% for South Bucks, 4.0% for the LEP area and 5.3% for the UK as a whole. A comparable trend of total population increase is observed over the 2007-2010 period, during which the total population of the PSA increased by 3.8%, compared with increases of 3.7% for South Bucks, 1.9% for the LEP area and 2.1% for the UK as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurostar and More
    PUBLISHED BY Upper Canada RaHway Society DECEMBER 1995 P.O. Box 122, Station A NUMBER SSI Toronto, Ontario M5W IA2 ISSN I 193-7971 Features this month Research and Reviews Transcontinental EUROSTARAND MORE 4 RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY 12 THE RAPIDO 15 •f The first part of Bob Sandusky's trip to • Courtaulds' equipment in Cornwall •f CN's plans for garbage in containers France and Great Britain. THE PANORAMA 17 New restaurant in Mont-Royal station OTTAWA TRANSITWAY EXTENSION 9 •f West Coast Express special trains •f A few eastern ramblings • The newest leg, opened in September Avalanche on BCR Tumbler Sub. •f Rail removals in Port Hope THE TRAIN SPOTTERS CP'S NEW GE LOCOMOTIVES ON TEST . 10 ... 19 ••• Photos at Rigaud by Michel Belhumeur. 4 Notes on weather arrd fire -f Tour of the West A word of explanation Renewals for 1996 meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. at the Toronto As I write this note, it is early February, quite With the last issues of Rail and Transit, most Hydro offices, 14 Carlton Street, just east of some time after the date on which I would members will have received renewal forms for College subway station. have preferred to be completing the December 1996. The dues are unchanged from 1995, The following meeting will be on March issue of Rail and Transit. $29.00 for addresses in Canada, $27.00 (U.S.) 15. After the business of the annual general The circumstances which led to this mis• or $35.00 (Canadian) for addresses in the U.S.
    [Show full text]