DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Note: Development That Should Have Been Assessed As Part of the Cumulative Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Note: Development That Should Have Been Assessed As Part of the Cumulative Assessment th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Joint Note: Development that should have been assessed as part of the cumulative assessment Statement on behalf of: LB Hillingdon, Slough BC, South Bucks DC and Bucks CC. 1. Project 1: Western Rail Link to Heathrow th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Highways England Comment 1.1 The Western Rail Link to Heathrow proposal it not yet either a committed project nor is it the subject of a live application. Its details and effects are not yet known. 1.2 The proposal was announced on 5 February 2014 following consideration of four options by Network Rail. At the time the assessment for the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway scheme (the "Scheme") was undertaken, the proposal was at “early stages of development” following its inclusion in the Route Utilisation Strategies published in March 2010. As such, it was not at a sufficiently developed stage to be included in the cumulative assessment for the Scheme and did not come within the guidelines set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (“DMRB”) for those committed, reasonably foreseeable developments that should be included in an assessment. It is understood that an application may be brought forward in due course. Any application for the construction of the Western Rail Link will be required to take the M4 Scheme into account when assessing the effect of its proposals, rather than the reverse. 1.3 Network Rail submitted a Scoping Report (Environmental Impact Assessment – Scoping Report, Western Rail Link to Heathrow, Jacobs, April 2015) to the Planning Inspectorate in April 2015 that set the principles of the proposed approach to the construction of the relocated depot. Chapter 18 of the Scoping Report covers the subject of cumulative assessment. Table 18.2 provides a summary of the major infrastructure projects and developments considered within the cumulative assessment together with the decision taken on whether to include the project or not. An extract from Table 18.2 is provided below, from which it can be seen that it is proposed to include the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway scheme within the assessment for the Western Rail Link but to exclude Heathrow Airport third runway, HS2 Heathrow spur and Heathrow Express depot. th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Table 18.2 Major infrastructure projects and other developments near to the Western Rail Link to Heathrow (abstract) 1.4 The Scoping Opinion for the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, published by the Planning Inspectorate in June 2015, also provides the following in relation to proposed access, construction, operation and maintenance: Proposed access “All access points under consideration for construction, operational and maintenance phases of the proposed development should be detailed in the ES. The ES should detail the environmental impacts of each option considered, including a worse-case scenario. The ES should also describe the th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 anticipated type, nature and extent of any other works necessary to construct the accesses (e.g. demolition works, road widening, footpath/pipeline diversions and vegetation clearance).” “Table 1-A of the Scoping Report confirms that Hollow Hill Lane would be permanently closed as a result of the proposed development. The ES should consider fully the impacts associated with the loss of this route as well as any opportunities to maintain an enhanced, diverted access. The applicant’s attention is drawn to South Bucks and Buckinghamshire County Council’s (BCC) comments in this respect. The applicant should continue to engage with Highways England and the local highways authorities regarding the effects of potential construction haulage and access routes. South Bucks comments regarding closure of the M4 motorway bridge at Old Slade lane should be noted as should Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) comments regarding weight restrictions through Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury.” Construction “The number of full time equivalent construction jobs expected to be generated by the proposed development is not included in the Scoping Report. The Secretary of State requests that this figure, along with an explanation of how it has been calculated, is provided in the ES. Details of construction working hours, including any unsocial hours of working anticipated, should also be provided. The size and precise details of construction compounds and material/plant storage areas are not clarified in the Scoping Report. Whilst it is appreciated that this information may not be available at this stage in the evolution of the proposed development, applicants are reminded that this information will be required and should be included within the ES. The Secretary of State considers that information on construction including: phasing of programme; construction methods and activities associated with each phase; ……..siting of construction compounds (including on and off site);………. and number, movements and parking of construction vehicles (both HGVs and staff) should be clearly indicated in the ES. Operation and maintenance “Information on the operation and maintenance of the proposed development should be included in the ES and should cover but not be limited to th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 such matters as: the number of full/part-time jobs; the operational hours and if appropriate, shift patterns; the number and types of vehicle movements generated during the operational stage. The applicant should confirm whether the line is proposed to be used by operational rail freight and assess this accordingly. From the foregoing Scoping Opinion it can be seen that the project remains at an early stage of development and until the supporting information is published it is not possible to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the Western Rail Link. 1.5 It is therefore considered that no additional assessment is required by the Scheme to take in to account the proposed Western Rail Link to Heathrow proposals, as it is too early in the scheme’s development for such an assessment to be proportionate. Moreover, as confirmed in the extracts above from the Western Rail Link Scoping Report, the assessment carried out by the Western Rail Link will take the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway Scheme within the scope of their assessment. th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 2. Project 2: HS2 th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Highways England Comment 2.1 The implementation of HS2 is dependent on the HS2 Bill receiving Royal Assent and, without such approval, it cannot be regarded as committed, although the policy of the Government is that it will be delivered. Nevertheless, Highways England has carried out a review of published documentation in respect of the construction and operation of HS2 and in particular, the sections of the scheme that pass through the jurisdictions of the four local authorities who have produced this joint statement. 2.2 The published documentation that has been reviewed includes the Community Forum Area Reports (HS2 London – West Midlands Environmental Statement, Volume 2, Community Forum Area Reports, November 2013). The impacts arising from the construction and operation of HS2 in the Colne Valley are summarised within Area Report CFA7. The outcome of the review of interactions with the Scheme is summarised below. th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Operational Impacts – Colne Valley 2.3 The potential impacts arising from the operation of HS2 within the Colne Valley area are summarised in paragraphs 12.5.3 and 4 of Area Report CFA7 as follows: “The operational traffic and transport impacts within this area will arise from the realignment of PRoW. Occasional traffic may access areas of the Proposed Scheme for maintenance purposes. However, these infrequent vehicle movements will be very low and will not have a significant effect.” 2.4 Given this assessment, Highways England does not consider that it is necessary for the Scheme to take account of HS2 once the HS2 has been completed and is in operation because HS2 traffic will be so limited. Construction Impacts – Colne Valley 2.5 The potential impacts arising from the construction of HS2 within the Colne Valley area are summarised in paragraph 12.4.2 of Area Report CFA7 as follows: “The Proposed Scheme is forecast to result in changes in daily traffic flows due to works and construction vehicles accessing worksites and also temporary road closures and diversions.” Map TR-053-051, reproduced below, illustrates the designated routes for construction traffic in the Colne Valley, together with the locations of local impacts. th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 2.6 The changes in traffic flows during construction of this section of HS2 have been assessed and reported in paragraph 12.4.13 of Area Report CFA7 as leading to significant increases in delays to vehicle users and congestion at the following junctions: A412 Denham Way with Chalfont Lane (minor adverse effect); A412 North Orbital Road with Woodlands Road (minor adverse effect); A412 North Orbital Road with Chalfont Road (minor adverse effect); A412 Denham Way with A404 North Orbital Road (minor adverse effect); A412 North Orbital Road with Denham Green Lane (major adverse effect); Harvil Road with Woodstock Drive (minor adverse effect); B467 Swakeleys Road with Harvil Road (moderate adverse effect); and A40 Western Avenue with B467 Swakeleys Road (moderate adverse effect). 2.7 Highways England notes that the routes subject to construction traffic impacts from HS2 within the Colne Valley are all north of the A413 / A40 corridor, with the exception of a section of the A355 near Beaconsfield. None of these routes overlap with the construction traffic routes identified for the Scheme. 2.8 A more detailed consideration of these impacts is provided in a Transport Assessment (HS2 London – West Midlands Environmental Statement, Volume 5 Technical Appendices, Transport Assessment (TR-001-000), Part 6: Country Assessment, Traffic and Transport, November 2013).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-Route Effects
    HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square July 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 X56 E [email protected] SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 www.gov.uk/hs2 HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects July 2015 SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 Copyright © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2015, except where otherwise stated. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full via the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre.
    [Show full text]
  • VALP Modelling
    VALP Modelling BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report TN02 | 2 30/05/19 BCC NE B ucks Loc al Plan T ests -Tec hnical Report BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report VALP Modelling Project No: BRJ10150 Document Title: NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Document No.: TN02 Revision: 2 Date: 30/05/19 Client Name: BCC Client No: BCC Project Manager: Mily Parveen Author: Catherine Hill File Name: M:\Transport Modelling\BRJ10150 VALP Model Runs\Technical Work\Reports\Countywide modelling report\Countywide Modelling Report- VALP 290519.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited NONE www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 28/02/19 Draft CH TW MP 1 09/04/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP 2 30/05/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP TN02 1 NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Scope of study ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Volume 2 (Appendices) (Part 3)
    PINEWOOD STUDIOS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND FIVE POINTS ROUNDABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 2 (APPENDICES) (PART 3) DOCUMENT NUMBER February 2013 Eiii ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT APPENDIX 13.1 Economic context A1.1 Introduction 1. This socio-economic baseline has been established through the analysis of the change over time of a range of applicable socio-economic indicators. The change over time within each area of impact has been compared. 2. Ward-level, Beaconsfield Constituency, Local Authority and LEP data are not available for every indicator group. A1.2 Economic output and productivity 3. In 2009 Buckinghamshire generated some £10,945 million of GVA, representing 6.1% of the GVA generated across the South East of England. Between 2005 and 2009, GVA in Buckinghamshire increased by 7.1%, although this was below the UK national rate of 12.5% over the same period. Figure 1 shows the change in GVA per head. Figure 1: Change in GVA per head (1999-2009) (current basic prices) 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 GVA perGVA head (£) 17,000 15,000 13,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 UK Buckinghamshire Source: ONS headline GVA per head by NUTS3 area A1.3 Population 4. Figure 2 shows the indexed change in total population over the 2001-2010 period. During this period, the total population of the PSA increased by 8.0%, compared with increases of 9.0% for South Bucks, 4.0% for the LEP area and 5.3% for the UK as a whole. A comparable trend of total population increase is observed over the 2007-2010 period, during which the total population of the PSA increased by 3.8%, compared with increases of 3.7% for South Bucks, 1.9% for the LEP area and 2.1% for the UK as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils
    Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 – Green Belt Preferred Options LC-330 Document Control Box Client Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Sustainability Appraisal of the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan Report Title (Regulation 18) Green Belt Preferred Options Status Final Filename LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS Date September 2017 Author DS Reviewed JE Approved ND Cover Photo: Looking East across option ‘National Epilepsy Centre, Chalfont St Peter’ © Lepus Consulting for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks SA Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS.docx Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 About the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2014-2036 ............................................... 4 1.4 The Regulation 18 Consultation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Session
    PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Monday 25 January 2016 (Evening) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Sir Henry Bellingham Sir Peter Bottomley Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Mr David Crausby Mr Mark Hendrick _____________ IN ATTENDANCE Mr James Strachan QC, Counsel, Department for Transport Mr Edward Briggs Mr Alan Masters WITN ESSES Mr Bob Birch Mr Andrew Pibworth Mr Simon Clarke Mr Michael Gallagher Mr Humphrey Tizard Mr Br ia n Cab le Mr Robin Allen Mr Tim Smart, International Director for High Speed Rail, CH2M Hill _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page The Association of the Residents of the Drive (Harefield Place) et al Submissions by Mr Masters 3 Evidence of Mr Birch 8 Mr Smart, examined by Mr Strachan 13 Mr Smart, cross-examined by Mr Masters 19 Further evidence from Mr Birch 27 Further submissions by Mr Masters 28 Evidence of Mr Pibworth 29 Evidence of Mr Clarke 34 Evidence of Mr Gallagher 35 Further submissions by Mr Masters 37 Response from Mr Strachan 38 Closing submissions by Mr Masters 41 Ickenham Residents’ As soc ia tio n Submissions by Mr Tizard 42 Response from Mr Strachan 51 Closing submissions by Mr Tizard 54 Mr Br ia n Cab le Submissions by Mr Cable 55 Response from Mr Strachan 59 The London Wildlife Trust Submissions by Mr Frith 64 Response from Mr Strachan 68 Denham Water Ski Club Submissions by Mr Briggs and Mr Allen 71 Response from Mr Strachan 77 2 (At 18.40) The Association of the Residents of the Drive (Harefield Place) et al 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Denham Parish Neighbourhood Plan Pre-Submission
    DENHAM PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2020 – 2036 SUBMISSION PLAN Denham Golf Club Station Published by Denham Parish Council for Pre-Submission consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended). OCTOBER 2020 A Guide to Reading this Plan Of necessity, this Neighbourhood Plan is a detailed technical document. The purpose of this page is to explain the structure and help you find your way around the plan. 1. Introduction & Background This section explains the background to this Neighbourhood Plan and how you can take part in and respond to the consultation. 2. The Neighbourhood Area This section details many of the features of the designated area. 3. Planning Policy Context This rather technical section relates this Plan to the National Planning Policy Framework and the planning policies of Buckinghamshire Council. 4. Community Views on Planning Issues This section explains the community involvement that has taken place. 5. Vision, Objectives & Land Use Policies This is the key section. Firstly, it provides a statement on the Neighbourhood Plan Vision and Objectives. It then details Policies which are proposed to address the issues outlined in the Foreword and in Section 4. These Policies are listed opposite. There are Policy Maps at the back of the plan and additional information in the Appendices to which the policies cross reference. 6. Implementation This section explains how the Plan will be implemented and future development guided and managed. It suggests projects which might be supported by the Community Infrastructure Levy which the Parish Council will have some influence over. Finally, it deals with a number of issues which although relevant are outside the scope of a Neighbourhood Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Professional
    February 2018 ciht.org.uk transportation professional Former colleagues reflect on Orbital interchange scheme bridge building bus patronage warm mix asphalt managing traffic Is Boris Johnson’s New study to Sustainability set Belgian city cuts Channel crossing explore reasons to be promoted out the cars plan a good idea? for declining use with specification from central area p4 p7 p20 p24 Visit CIHT’s official jobs website:cihtjobs.com @CIHTUK #CIHTconf CIHT Annual Conference 2018 Highways: Change, innovation and the future Thursday 8 March Park Plaza Victoria London SW1V 1EQ A DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE CONFERENCE The conference will explore how the Highways sector is changing and how innovation will drive continuous change Live presentations Interviews with infl uential industry leaders Informative break-out sessions Build your knowledge and skills, network with peers and contribute to your CPD Leading speakers and panel members addressing the conference include: ■ Roy Brannen, chief executive, Transport Scotland, who is the subject of the conference’s main interview and will off er a global perspective of the sector ■ Elliot Shaw, executive director of strategy and planning, Highways England, who will explain its approach to the next investment period on the strategic road network ■ Dave Wright, executive director for highways at Kier will share his experience from the company’s perspective as a leading Gold Corporate Partner ■ Dana Skelley OBE, director of strategy and operational excellence at Skanska Civil Engineering will draw on her experience
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire Council
    Buckinghamshire Council www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk Report to South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee Application Number: PL/19/4159/FA Proposal: Erection of crematorium, dining hall and widening of access road with associated landscape and biodiversity enhancements. Site Location: The Lea, Western Avenue, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4NA Applicant: Anoopam Mission Case Officer: Laura Peplow Ward affected: Denham Parish Town Council: Denham Parish Council Valid date: 2 December 2019 Determination date: 6 March 2020 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Committee delegate the application to the Director of Planning and Environment to: GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions set out in this report and any others which he considers appropriate and to: a) The satisfactory completion of a Section 106 Agreement to secure the requirements as set out in this report. b) There being no new substantive, material planning matters being raised following statutory publicity for the development proposed being a potential ‘Departure from the Development Plan’ c) Resolving that the application be forwarded to the Secretary of State in accordance with the provision of the Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009. Or REFUSE planning permission if a satisfactory S106 Agreement cannot be completed, for such reasons relating to the Countryside Management Service and Public Rights of Way as the Director of Planning and Environment considers appropriate. 1.0 Summary & Recommendation/ Reason for Planning Committee Consideration 1.1 The application proposes the construction of a crematorium and dining hall within the grounds of the existing Anoopam Mission Temple site. 1.2 The site is within the Green Belt and construction of the proposed development would constitute inappropriate development and would also result in a loss of openness and encroachment into the Green Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeches Local Area Forum
    Buckinghamshire County Council Visit www.buckscc.gov.uk/democracy for councillor information and email alerts for local meetings Beeches Local Area Forum Title: Update report from Transport for Buckinghamshire Date: 6 March 2013 Author: Sean Rooney Contact officer: Si Khan Transport Localities Team Leader (South) 01494 475320 Electoral divisions affected: Burnham Beeches Taplow, Dorney and Lent Rise Stoke Poges & Farnham Common Summary 1. From 2010 this standard report will be issued to each Local Area Forum (LAF) / Local Community Partnership (LCP) from Transport for Buckinghamshire. 2. It will aim to provide a comprehensive update on current and relevant Transportation issues which are tailored to each individual LAF / LCP. 3. Standard topics to be covered will be: - Dates of when Local Community Gangs will visit parishes - Major issues likely to affect parishes within the LAF / LCP - Update on ongoing local issues - Policy Development - Any other information 4. In addition, it will cover any emerging issues which could or will affect Local Area Forum / Local Community Partnership areas. Area Maintenance Routine Maintenance At present, the peaks and troughs in the numbers of potholes, have been absorbed by the works teams, whilst keeping other patching, white lining, gully emptying crews etc, on normal duties. The workforce is to be supplemented on 27th February by the introduction of a Velocity Patcher. This self contained unit, is specifically for potholing, minor patching and sealing of road surfaces and will initially be used on the rural roads. If you have any queries, please contact you local area technician in the first instance. Any urgent works should be reported via the Contact Centre on: 0845 230 2882 or through our website at: http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/transport/ea_report_problem.page A full list of when work will be taking place is available on: http://www.transportforbucks.net/Roadworks-Centre.aspx Winter Maintenance The recent cold snap passed without significant disruption to the network.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Sth December 1981
    15620 THE LONDON GAZETTE, STH DECEMBER 1981 Particulars of the proposals are contained in the Wages HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Council's Notice D (182), copies of which may be obtained on application to the Secretary of the Wages Council The Folkestone-Honiton Trunk Road (Ferndown Bypass, at the address given below. The Wages Council will con- Side Roads) Order 198 sider any written representation with respect to the pro- The Secretary of State for Transport hereby gives notice posals if made within 21 days from 8th December 1981. that he proposes, in relation to the new trunk road which Any such representation should bear the writer's address he proposes to construct as a bypass to Ferndown in the and signature and be sent to the Secretary, Boot and Shoe county of Dorset, to make under sections 14 and 125 of Repairing Wages Council (Great Britain), 12 St. James's the Highways Act 1980 an Order authorising him: Square, London SW1Y 4LL. It is desirable that persons (a) to improve, raise, lower or otherwise alter highways, making objections should state the precise nature of their (b) to stop up highways, objections and quote the number of the Wages Council's (c) to construct new highways, Notice of Proposals D (182). (a) to stop up private means of access to premises, and (e) to provide new means of access to premises, Yvonne M. Simmons, Secretary all at Ferndown aforesaid, and providing for the transfer 7th December 1981. (SSI) of each of the said new highways to the County Council of Dorset as from the date on which he notifies the Council that the new highways have been completed and are open for through traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Assessment
    HIGH SPEED RAIL(LONDON WEST- MIDLANDS) | SES3 and AP4 ES SES3 AP4 and HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST | Volume 5 | Technical appendices | Transport Assessment | Transport appendices 5 | Technical Volume MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square Revised version issued 30 October 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 E [email protected] Z70 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 AP4 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 SES3 and AP4 ES – VOLUME 5 www.gov.uk/hs2 AP4 SS&Pur A4P-1.indd 37 30/10/2015 15:49:36 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON - WEST MIDLANDS) Supplementary Environmental Statement 3 and Additional Provision 4 Environmental Statement Volume 5 | Technical appendices Transport Assessment (TR-001-000) NOTE: this document was updated on 30th October 2015 to correct specific traffic data relating to CFAs 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The corrected text is highlighted in yellow. These corrections do not affect the outcome of the traffic assessments. October 2015 SES3 and AP4 ES 3.5.1.10.1 www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • London to West Midlands) Bill
    1737 IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2013-2014 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON TO WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Against - On Merits - Praying to be heard by counsel, &c. TO THE HONOURABLE THE COMMONS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED. THE HUMBLE PETITION of Julian Williams SHEWETH as follows:- 1. A Bill (hereinafter referred to as "the Bill") has been introduced and is now pending in your honourable House intituled "A Bill to make provision for a railway between Euston in London and a junction with the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre in Staffordshire, with a spur from Old Oak Common in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a junction with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link at York Way in the London Borough of Islington and a spur from Water Orton in WanA/ickshire to Curzon Street in Binningham; and for connected purposes." 2. The Bill is presented by Mr Secretary McLoughlin, supported by The Prime Minister, The Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Theresa May, Secretary Vince Cable, Secretary lain Duncan Smith, Secretary Eric Pickles, Secretary Owen Paterson, Secretary Edward Davey, and Mr Robert Goodwill. 3. Clauses 1 to 36 set out the Bill's objectives in relation to the construction and operation of the railway mentioned in paragraph 1 above. They include provision for the construction of works, highways and road traffic matters, the compulsory acquisition of land and other provisions relating to the use of land, planning permission, heritage issues, trees and noise. They include clauses which would disapply and modify various enactments relating to special categories of land including burial grounds, consecrated land, commons and open spaces, and other matters, including overhead lines, water, building regulations and party walls, street works and the use of lorries.
    [Show full text]