DOCSLIB.ORG

48Th Annual Conference of the Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, 1750-1850

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
48Th Annual Conference of the Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, 1750-1850 48th Annual Conference of the Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, 1750-1850 22-24 February 2018 Hilton Philadelphia at Penn’s Landing 201 South Christopher Columbus Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19106 Consortium of the Revolutionary Era, 1750-1850 22-24 February 2018 West Chester University of Pennsylvania, Host Thursday 22 February 2018 Registration: 3:00-6:00 pm (Foyer of Ballroom A) Welcome Reception: 5:30-7:00 pm (Foyer of Ballroom A) Opening Keynote Address: 7:00 pm (Ballroom A) Simon Bainbridge (Lancaster University) “‘The Governor who must be wise and good’? Ideas of Leadership in the British Literature of the Revolutionary Era” Friday 23 February 2018 Session 1 8:30-10:15 (5 panels) 1A “Exile, Identity, and the Mediterranean” Chair: Selena Anders (University of Notre Dame School of Architecture in Rome) Konstantina Zanou (Columbia University) “Becoming an exile: Mario Pieri and the Greek Revolution from the Italian shores” Glauco Schettini (Fordham University) “Revolution across the Sea: Italy, the Mediterranean, and the ‘Republic of Mankind’, 1796–1799” David Laven (University of Nottingham) “The Idea of the Venetian Mediterranean and Mediterranean Venice in the post-Napoleonic Era” Commenter: Ralph Kingston (Auburn University) 1B “Imperial Ambitions and Strategies: France and Britain 1790-1815” Chair: Xavier Marechaux, SUNY-Oldwestbury Dzavid Dzanic (Austin Peay State University) “Corsairs, French Empire, and International Law in Tunisia, 1789- 1815” Christopher T. Golding (Temple University) “The ‘Smallspot in the Ocean’: British Imperial-Maritime Strategy, 1793-1815” Commenter: Stephen Hague (Rowan University) 1C “Producing and Defining Identities in Colonial and Revolutionary North America, Part I” Chair: Rosamond Hooper-Hamersley (Montclair State University) J. Patrick Mullins (Marquette University) “‘The unlicked Cub of Forty-One’: Refighting the English Civil War in Colonial New England’s Public Memory” Abby Chandler (University of Massachusetts Lowell) “’Let us unanimously lay aside foreign Superfluities’: Textiles, Subjecthood and Politics in the pre-Revolutionary British Empire” Commenter: Peter C. Messer (Mississippi State University) 1D “Loyalty and Conflict: German Monarchy in an Uncertain Europe, 1715-1763” Chair: David Ellis (Augustana College) William P. Tatum, III (Duchess County (NY) Historian) “‘His Majesty’s pleasure was Signifyd as follows’: George I’s Impact on the British Military Justice System” Alexander Burns (West Virginia University) “‘We could not serve anywhere better than under the King’: Common Soldiers and Frederick II of Prussia” Rita Krueger (Temple University) "Monarchs and Mercenaries: The Trencks in the Age of Revolution" Commenter: Sam Mustafa (Ramapo College) 1E “Operations in Napoleonic Warfare” Chair: Jordan Hayworth (USAF Air Command & Staff College) Phillip Cuccia (US Army War College) "River Crossings and Pursuit: the Bassano Campaign from Rovereto to San Georgio, September 1796" Mark Gerges (US Army Command & General Staff College) "Wellington and Crossing the Douro in 1813: Maneuver in Inhospitable Terrain" Michael Leggiere (University of North Texas) "Blücher and the Crossing of the Elbe at Wartenburg in 1813: The Challenges of Attacking an Unassailable Position" Commenter: Jonathan Abel (US Army Command & General Staff College) Break 10:15-10:30 Session 2 10:30-12:15 (6 panels) 2A Roundtable: “‘Declarations of Rights’: Inequalities Born in Ages of Democratic Revolutions” Chair: Laurel Ulrich (Harvard University) Jack Censer (George Mason University) Janet Polasky (University of New Hampshire) Marcela Echeverri (Yale University) Jennifer Rittenhouse (George Mason University) Commenter: Audience 2B “Franco-American Diplomacy and Exchange in the Age of Revolution” Chair: Lloyd Kramer (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill) Presenter A: Elizabeth Cross (Florida State University) “Navigating Neutrality: Edmond Genêt and the Ordeal of the Compagnie des Indes in Philadelphia, 1793-1794” Presenter B: Manuel Covo (University of California–Santa Barbara) “Why Did France Want Louisiana Back (1795-1800)?” Presenter C: Rafe Blaufarb (Florida State University) “The French Revolution and America’s Manifest Destiny” Commenter: Pernille Røge (University of Pittsburgh) 2C “European Responses to the Continental System: Shock, Resilience and Civil Adjustment: A Panel in Remembrance and Honor of Geoffrey Ellis” Chair: Katherine B. Aaslestad (West Virginia University) Hilde Greefs (University of Antwerp) “Resilience or Disruption? The Maritime Trade Community in Antwerp, 1795-1817” Johan Joor (Huygens Institute) “A Tale of Two Cities: Rotterdam and Amsterdam during a Time of Turmoil and Crises Urban Resilience and Consequences of the Napoleonic Continental Blockade, 1806-1813” Michael Rowe (King’s College London) “The End of Napoleon’s Continental System and the Beginnings of Political Mobilization in Restoration Europe, 1814 to 1820” Commenter: Alex Grab (University of Maine) 2D “Emigrants and Authority in the Age of Revolutions” Chair: Gabriella Angeloni (University of South Carolina) Patrick Harris (Rutgers University) “‘Les Vrais Émigrés’: Policing Exile in the Revolutionary Caribbean” Mary Ashburn Miller (Reed College) “Reintegrating the Emigrant: Surveillance and the Napoleonic State” Sydney Watts (University of Richmond) “French Emigration across the English Channel, 1791-1804: Policing the Resettlement on the Franco-British Island of Jersey” Erik Braeden Lewis (Florida State University) “Citoyenne or Émigrée? The Countess du Barry in London, 1791- 93” Commenter: Don Sutherland (University of Maryland) 2E “Producing and Defining Identities on the North American Frontier, Part II” Chair: Vivian Bruce Conger (Ithaca College) Elizabeth Kiszonas (University of Arkansas) “Westward Empire: George Berkeley in Revolutionary America” Jay Donis (Lehigh University) “Dual Identities: The Growth of Nationalism and Provincialism in Revolutionary Kentucky” Chad R. Holmes (West Virginia University) “Regulating Opportunity and Failure: Antebellum Sheriff Sales in the Ohio River Valley, 1830-1850” Commenter: Billy Smith (Montana State University) 2F Pedagogical Roundtable: “Leading the Revolution in Historical Pedagogy: Using Role Playing Games from Reacting to the Past to Teach the Revolutionary Era.” Chair: James Scythes (West Chester University) Eleanor H. McConnell (Frostburg State University) Mary K. Robinson (Lourdes University) Commenter: Audience Friday Lunch (12:30-2:15) Ballroom A Luncheon Address: Erica Armstrong Dunbar (Rutgers University), “The Founding of a Nation Through the Eyes of the Enslaved” Session 3 2:30-4:15 (6 panels) 3A “Transnational Race and Slavery in the Revolutionary Era” Chair: Bill Olejniczak (College of Charleston) Jeffery Stanley (Dalton State College) “Remaking a Slave Society: The Concordats of 1791 and the Free People of Color’s Challenge to White Supremacy” Jeremy Popkin (University of Kentucky) “Jacobin, Journalist, Abolitionist: The Strange Story of Milscent Créole” Erika Denise Edwards (University of North Carolina-Charlotte) “A Birth of a Nation: Free Womb Acts in the Americas during the Age of Revolution” Anne Kerth (Princeton University) “‘Of the First in Importance’: Enslaved Artisans on the Antebellum Plantation” Commenter: John Garrigus (University of Texas-Arlington) 3B “Recent Trends in Art and Architecture of the Napoleonic Era & Beyond: Paris-Rome” Chair: John Lambertson, Washington and Jefferson College Selena Anders (University of Notre Dame School of Architecture in Rome) “From Paris to Rome: Giuseppe Valadier and Urban Planning under Napoleon” Dorothy Johnson (University of Iowa) “Jacques-David, Napoleon and the Problematics of Embodiment” Simone Zurawski (DePaul University) “On the Revival of National History Painting in the Restoration: The ‘Heroic’ Saint Vincent de Paul in Iconographie, 1817 to 1824” David O’Brien (University of Illinois) “Summation & Overview of Trends in Napoleonic Art & Architecture … Future Directions” Commenter: Audience 3C “Petitionary Practices and Protest in the Age of Revolution: Ruptures and Continuities” Part I Chair: Fara Dabhoiwala (Princeton University) Philip Baltuskonis (University of Mississippi) “‘These indisputable precepts of the Rights of Man’: Revolutionary Wives and Their Petitions in Late Colonial New Granada” Joris Oddens (Leiden University) “The Petitioning Industry: Petitions for Jobs, Delegated Writing, and Patronage in the Batavian Republic” David Zaret (Indiana University–Bloomington) “The Duke’s Agents and the 1831 Anti-Reform Petitions from Northumberland” Commenter: Janet Polasky (University of New Hampshire) 3D “Officers and Soldiering in North America: Observations and Experiences Leading and Supplying the Revolutionary Army in America” Chair: Colin J. Williams (US Army Center of Military History) Rachel Engl (Lehigh University) “Creating A League of Gentleman: The Culture of the Continental Army Officer Corps” Cody Nager (The Graduate Center, CUNY) “‘The Manners of the Good Republicans’: French Officers’ Changing Impressions of the United States after the Battle of Yorktown” Steve Gimber (West Chester University) “‘Heads out, hoops off, casks open, and flour wasting’: The Struggle to Supply the Continental Army with Wheat and Flour” Commenter: Leo J. Daugherty III (Senior Command Historian, US Army Cadet Command and Fort Knox) 3E “The German Way of War: Military Theory and Practice during the Russian Campaign of 1812” Chair: John H. Gill, National Defense University Vanya Eftimova Bellinger
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Treaty of Lunéville J. David Markham When Napoleon Became
    The Treaty of Lunéville J. David Markham When Napoleon became First Consul in 1799, his first order of business was to defend France against the so-called Second Coalition. This coalition was made up of a number of smaller countries led by Austria, Russia and Britain. The Austrians had armies in Germany and in Piedmont, Italy. Napoleon sent General Jean Moreau to Germany while he, Napoleon, marched through Switzerland to Milan and then further south, toward Alessandria. As Napoleon, as First Consul, was not technically able to lead an army, the French were technically under the command of General Louis Alexandre Berthier. There, on 14 June 1800, the French defeated the Austrian army led by General Michael von Melas. This victory, coupled with Moreau’s success in Germany, lead to a general peace negotiation resulting in the Treaty of Lunéville (named after the town in France where the treaty was signed by Count Ludwig von Cobenzl for Austria and Joseph Bonaparte for Austria. The treaty secured France’s borders on the left bank of the Rhine River and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. France ceded territory and fortresses on the right bank, and various republics were guaranteed their independence. This translation is taken from the website of the Fondation Napoléon and can be found at the following URL: https://www.napoleon.org/en/history-of-the- two-empires/articles/treaty-of-luneville/. I am deeply grateful for the permission granted to use it by Dr. Peter Hicks of the Fondation. That French organization does an outstanding job of promoting Napoleonic history throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre Riel, the Marquis De Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte's Spanish Policy, 1802-05 Michael W
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Fear and Domination: Pierre Riel, the Marquis de Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte's Spanish Policy, 1802-05 Michael W. Jones Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Fear and Domination: Pierre Riel, the Marquis de Beurnonville at the Spanish Court and Napoleon Bonaparte’s Spanish Policy, 1802-05 By Michael W. Jones A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester 2005 Copyright 2004 Michael W. Jones All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approved the dissertation of Michael W. Jones defended on 28 April 2004. ________________________________ Donald D. Horward Professor Directing Dissertation ________________________________ Outside Committee Member Patrick O’Sullivan ________________________________ Jonathan Grant Committee Member ________________________________ James Jones Committee Member ________________________________ Paul Halpern Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my father Leonard William Jones and my mother Vianne Ruffino Jones. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Earning a Ph.D. has been the most difficult task of my life. It is an endeavor, which involved numerous professors, students, colleagues, friends and family. When I started at Florida State University in August 1994, I had no comprehension of how difficult it would be for everyone involved. Because of the help and kindness of these dear friends and family, I have finally accomplished my dream.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Enlightenment As a Catalyst for Beneficial Change in the Region
    UNA REVOLUCION, NI MAS NI MENOS: THE ROLE OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT IN THE SUPREME JUNTAS IN QUITO, 1765-1822 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Beau James Brammer, B.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Master’s Examination Committee: Kenneth Andrien, Adviser Stephanie Smith Alan Gallay Copyright by Beau James Brammer 2010 Abstract This thesis examines the role the European Enlightenment played in the political sphere during the late colonial era in the Audiencia of Quito. Until the eighteenth century, Creole elites controlled the local economic and governmental sectors. With the ascension of the Bourbon dynasty in 1700, however, these elites of Iberian descent began to lose their power as new European ideas, emerging from the Enlightenment, led to a process of consolidating and centralizing power into the hands of Peninsular Spanish officials. Known as the Bourbon Reforms, these measures led to Creole disillusionment, as they began losing power at the local level. Beginning in the 1770s and 1780s, however, Enlightenment ideas of “nationalism” and “rationality” arrived in the Andean capital, making their way to the disgruntled Creoles. As the situation deteriorated, elites began to incorporate these new concepts into their rhetoric, presenting a possible response to the Reforms. When Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808, the Creoles expelled the Spanish government in Quito, creating an autonomous movement, the Junta of 1809, using these Enlightenment principles as their justification. I argue, however, that while these ‘modern’ principles gave the Creoles an outlet for their grievances, it is their inability to find a common ground on how their government should interpret these new ideas which ultimately lead to the Junta’s failure.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Learn from the Stephen Girard Collection – by Elizabeth Laurent – Former Director of Historic Resources, Girard College
    Click Here to Return to Home Page and Main Menu Real and Rare: What We Learn from the Stephen Girard Collection – By Elizabeth Laurent – Former Director of Historic Resources, Girard College A joy of my job is The Archives holds Stephen Girard’s Papers, a collection sharing the Stephen available on microfilm to researchers at the Philadelphia’s Girard Collection with American Philosophical Society. The Girard Papers current Girard College include over 800 boxes of “loose” papers of incoming students. Sometimes, correspondence; receipts; lists; construction, garden and the students, seeing ship records; and architectural I’m so much older than drawings. We have three they, figure I must have thousand of Girard’s bound been alive in the 1800’s volumes, including year-by- and ask, “Mrs. Laurent, year receipt books, copies of his did you know Stephen outgoing correspondence, ship Portrait of Stephen Girard Girard?” By Bass Otis, 1832 log books, maps, bank records This is a funny but reasonable question. They rightly and his personal library. wonder how I know anything about Stephen Girard. At our museum in The glory of the Stephen Founder’s Hall on the Girard Collection is how Girard College campus, its authentic and varied we preserve thousands objects give us a sense of of objects from Girard’s the man. The artifacts Philadelphia townhouse: reflect their owner, being a Founder’s Hall on the Girard College his furniture, silver, Girard’s bound volumes personal collection of items sculpture, paintings, prints both plain and fancy. and porcelain. The collection also includes everyday items, It is rare for a man’s artifacts and archives to remain together like his clothing, darned socks and toupee; and household long after his death.
    [Show full text]
  • From an Engraving in the Historical Society of Pennsylvania of The
    From an engraving in The Historical Society of Pennsylvania of the original painted from life at Bordentown, New Jersey, by Goubaud, an artist from Brussels, in January, 1831. 208 Joseph Bonaparte JOSEPH BONAPARTE as recorded in the Private Journal of Nicholas Biddle With an Introduction and Notes By EDWARD BIDDLE Joseph Bonaparte, eldest brother of the Emperor Napoleon (Bonaparte), arrived in this country in Au- gust, 1815—landing in New York on the twenty-eighth of the month—the passage from Bordeaux having con- sumed thirty-four days. It was not without risk of capture that Joseph suc- ceeded in reaching the soil of this country. Two En- glish war-vessels had overhauled the ship after leaving Bordeaux, but appeared satisfied with the passports that had been secured before sailing. Joseph's was in the name of Surviglieri, anticipating by analogy the one of Survilliers later adopted in this country. Joseph and his small suite lingered a few days in New York before setting out for Washington, D. C, passing through Philadelphia and Baltimore en route; the object of this journey being a proposed call on President Madison. For political reasons and for fear of embarrassing the Administration, Madison declined to receive Joseph—so that being apprized of this deci- sion after leaving Baltimore, he did not continue his journey to the Capitol. On the journey back he passed through Lancaster, Pennsylvania, being entertained there by a Mr. Slaymaker. He reached Philadelphia on the eighteenth of September, 1815. Napoleon had advised him to take up his residence in this country somewhere between Philadelphia and New York, so that news from the Old World could readily reach him.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE from THE FRICK COLLECTION 1 EAST 70TH STREET • NEW YORK • NEW YORK 10021 • TELEPHONE (212) 288-0700 • FAX (212) 628-4417 Goya’s Last Works First Exhibition in North America to Focus on Final Period of Goya’s Working Life February 22, 2006, through May 14, 2006 Goya’s luminous 1824 portrait of a woman known as María Martínez de Puga has always held a special place in the artist’s oeuvre as one of his most direct and candid works, radical in its simplicity. Acquired by Henry Clay Frick in 1914, the painting is the inspiration for the upcoming special exhibition, Goya’s Last Works, the first in the United States to concentrate exclusively on the final phase of the artist’s long career, primarily on the period of his voluntary exile in Bordeaux from 1824 to 1828. The exhibition will present over fifty objects including paintings, miniatures on ivory, lithographs, and drawings borrowed from public and private European and American collections. These works reveal the vitality and irrepressible creativity of an artist who, at age seventy-eight, in frail health and long deaf, pulled up roots in Madrid, his home for the preceding half century, and started over in France. Portrait of a Lady (María Martínez de Puga?), His final works have little in common with those of his contemporaries in France and 1824, Oil on canvas, 31 1/2 x 23 in. (80 x 58.4 cm), The Frick Collection, New York, Photography by Richard di Liberto in Spain and had almost no impact on the generations that immediately followed; in fact, they remained little known until the early twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Bonaparte and the Crown Jewels
    Joseph Bonaparte and the Crown Jewels José Flaugier created a portrait of Joseph Bonaparte, circa 1809. It is depicted in this image. As Napoleon Bonaparte's older brother, Joseph (1768-1844) was the King of Spain between 1808-1813. He was also the King of Naples between 1806-1808. Born in Corsica, like his famous brother, he died in Florence when he was 76 years old. In the meantime ... after Napoleon's second exile ... Joseph sailed to America. With him, allegedly, were some of Spain's crown jewels which he sold to raise funds for his new life. Joseph left the rest of his fortune safely buried in Switzerland, at least for a time, until he sent his trusted secretary to retrieve it all. The former king lived a life of luxury in New Jersey. He called his estate "Point Breeze." His two surviving daughters - Zenaïde and Charlotte - spent time with him there. Accumulating one of America's finest art collections, Joseph remained in the States until 1832. Moving to London, he returned to America once more for a brief visit. Never allowed to return to France, Joseph was given permission to visit his family in Italy. He traveled there, circa 1840. He had not seen his wife -Marie-Julie Bonaparte - for twenty-five years. He remained with his wife for the rest of his life and died, in her arms, on the 28th of July, 1844. Julie died eight months later. Click on the image for a better view. Credits: Image online, courtesy Wikimedia Commons. PD See Alignments to State and Common Core standards for this story online at: http://www.awesomestories.com/asset/AcademicAlignment/Joseph-Bonaparte-and-the-Crown-Jewels See Learning Tasks for this story online at: http://www.awesomestories.com/asset/AcademicActivities/Joseph-Bonaparte-and-the-Crown-Jewels Media Stream Joseph Bonaparte and the Crown Jewels View this asset at: http://www.awesomestories.com/asset/view/.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertine Erudition: José Marchena's Fragmentum Petronii and The
    LIBERTINE ERUDITION: JOSÉ Marchena’s FRAGMENTUM PETRONII AND THE POWER OF False 1 Joaquín Álvarez Barrientos In his book Questions de littérature légale, Charles Nodier sets out a cat- egorisation or typology of forgeries, one of which he labels “la supposi- tion des passages,” or supposititious passages. These supposed passages, if contexts and paratexts prove suitably convincing, have many features which make them credible. For the most part this can be explained by the fact that forgers play on the desire of the scientific community to possess originals as well as new works by well-known writers, and also specifically because, in addition to the supposed discovery, there is a known author whose reputation and oeuvre have to be completed. The need to fill in gaps led to the invention of supposed letters by the authors of the texts edited, which were published as appendices to their complete works in order to round out their image and complete the list of their writings. It also led to a filling-in of gaps in already known but incomplete texts. José Marchena (1768–1821) and the Practice of Falsification This is precisely what was carried out by José Marchena, a Spanish literary figure who was born in Utrera in the province of Seville on 18 Novem- ber 1768 and who died in Madrid on 31 January 1821. He studied Latin and Humanities in Madrid and Salamanca; in the latter university he met other important figures of the period such as Juan Meléndez Valdés, a Francophile like himself, and Ramón Salas, a cultural radical with liberal ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures
    ISSN 2414-8385 (Online) European Journal of September-December 2017 ISSN 2414-8377 (Print Multidisciplinary Studies Volume 2, Issue 7 Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures Zakia Sultana Assist. Prof., School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Sciences (UITS), Baridhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh Abstract Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. After the fall of Napoleon, not only was the Napoleonic Code retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • 43Rd Annual La Fête Francaise FRENCH FESTIVAL • CAPE VINCENT, NY SATURDAY and SUNDAY, JULY 9 and 10, 2011 SATURDAY, JULY 9TH 11:00 Am Official Opening Reviewing Mr
    22001111 CCaappee VViinncceenntt •• NNeeww YYoorrkk FFFrrreeennnccchhh FFFeeessstttiiivvvaaalll 444333rrrddd AAAnnnnnnuuuaaalll BIENVENUE SATURDAY & S UNDAY • J ULY 9 & 10, 2011 Wolfe Island, Ont. /Cape Vincent, NY Ph 613-385-2402 – or – 315-783-0638 8:00am – 7:30 pm daily May 1 – to - Oct. 23 Only International Car/Passenger Ferry on the St. Lawrence River hornesferry.com ROTARY CLUB OF CLAYTON Frank Sinatra Tribute Concert: July 15 Benefiting Rotary Club of Clayton Scholarships Clayton Opera House-7:00 p.m. Advance Tickets $20/$25 Day of Event Box Office: 315.686.2200 Annual Gun and Sportsman's Show: August 20-21 Benefiting scholarships and service projects Clayton's Recreation Park Arena Saturday 8:30-5:00; Sunday 9:00-4:00 Admission $5/day; $4 for military with ID, under 12 free 2 EARLY FRENCH HISTORY Early records of the exploration of the French in North America tell us that they were in the area of Cape Vincent as early as 1615. This area was also occupied by the indians and used as their hunting grounds for many years. In 1655 the French mis - sionary priests Father Chaumonoit, Father Dablon and Father Simon LeMoyne came among the Onondaga Indians to establish missions and homes. James LeRay de Chaumont acquired gres stayed on and many of their descen - many thousands of acres of land in North - dants still live in the area. Reminders of our ern New York in the late 1790’s and early French history include many family names, 1800’s. Cape Vincent was named after his homes, personal belongings, letters and son, Vincent LeRay.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, And
    CY332/Baehr&Richter-FM 0 521 825636 October 15, 2003 8:21 Dictatorship in History and Theory bonapartism, caesarism, and totalitarianism This book is unusual in bringing together the work of historians and political theo- rists under one cover to consider the subject of nineteenth- and twentieth-century dictatorships. A distinguished group of authors examine the complex relationship among nineteenth-century democracy, nationalism, and authoritarianism, paying special attention to the careers of Napoleon I and III and of Bismarck. An important contribution of the book is consideration not only of the momentous episodes of coup d’etat,´ revolution, and imperial foundation that the Napoleonic era heralded, but also the contested political language with which these events were described and assessed. Political thinkers were faced with a battery of new terms – “Bonapartism,” “Caesarism,” and “Imperialism” among them – with which to make sense of their era. In addition to documenting the political history of a revolutionary age, the book examines a series of thinkers – Tocqueville, Marx, Max Weber, Antonio Gramsci, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt – who articulated and helped to reshape our sense of the political. Peter Baehr is Associate Professor of Political Sociology at Lingnan University. His books include Founders, Classics, Canons (2002) and Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World (1998). He is the editor of The Portable Hannah Arendt (2000) and co-editor, with Gordon Wells, of The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings (2002) and Max Weber (1995). Melvin Richter is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the City University of New York, Graduate Center, and Hunter College.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet Affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Whittaker, Kelly Diane, "Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 1437. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE: THE MALET AFFAIR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History by Kelly Diane Whittaker B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 December, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter One General Malet: A Biography . 8 Two Hopes and Disappointments in Napoleonic France . 46 Three General Malet’s Final Attempt, 22 October 1812 . 73 Conclusion . 95 Notes . .100 Bibliography . .112 Vita . 115 ii ABSTRACT The French Revolution ushered in a period of political unrest in France which appeared never-ending, even when a seemingly stable government rose to power. After a series of failed Republican governments, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control on 18 Brumaire VIII, promising to uphold the revolutionary ideals that had permeated the nation.
    [Show full text]