Dreadnought Florida Beats World's Navies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1 -
Alternative Naval Force Structure
Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills UnmannedCentric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org -
1933-11-16 [P A-4]
__ Union Is not only willing but anxious to Washington to represent the hos- to spend in the United States, if proper pitals and already has been in confer- credit arrangements can be made. Ac- ence with the Consumers' Advisory McLean have Funeral Riles for Admiral RUSSIA 10 SPEND cording to reliable estimates, which HOSPITAL MILK Board over the possibility of obtaining LUMBER CODE WINS come to the attention of the Moscow relief for the hospitals through the WHICH HE DIED. l?SHr .'V £/ SERVICES HELD ABOARD SHIP ON there is In the United | amendment of the milk codes government, already States a surplus of nearly 40,000,000 adopted. He hopes also to have clauses pounds of butter and an equally large inserted In pending marketing agree- surplus of lard. American farm and ments excluding hospitals and other meat Interest, it is said, would part I charitable organizations from the effect with these products at an exceedingly of the codes. moderate price. Possibility that many free wards for Those Af- Litvinoff Consults Farm The critical shortage of fats In the j Protests Are Taken Up With babies and charity maternity hospitals Even Adversely Soviet Union is rivaled by an equal; might be forced to close was foreseen if not greater shortage in textiles. by the N. R. A. Consumers’ Board. It Leaders on Prices and While are conducted Consumers’ Council of was fected by Program See Need negotiations being explained that such Institutions for 1.000,000 bales of cotton. It is esti- operate under extremely close budgets Needs in Homeland. -
The Moore Family1 the First Moore We Are Sure About Was John Moore G9
Chapter 1 The Moore Family1 The first Moore we are sure about was John Moore G9. (See Charts 3) His father almost certainly was William Moore G10, who received a patent for 300 acres on a branch of the Nansemond River in Virginia on the 6 of December 1652. The records of the Isle of Wight show that in 1667, William Smelley patented land on the western branch of the Nansemond River adjoining John Moore. In 1668. Thomas Cullen also is listed as patented 400 acres adjoining John Moore in the Upper Parish of Nansemond Co. The property being referred to must certainly be the same as that patented by William Moore in 1652. The fact that John Moore owned property on the Nansemond River makes the likelihood very high that William was John’s father. I believe it is also significant that a William Moore (More) was a member of the Virginia Company of London.2 He is one of the signers of the May 23,1609 Second Charter. Many of those members sailed to Virginia to become planters; some, however, were only investors. There is no evidence that William Moore of London ever came to America. Nothing is really known about either William Moore of London or the one who patented land in 1652 beyond what is described above. It is plausible that the William Moore who was a member of the Virginia Company of London was father to William Moore (G10) who patented land in 1652. Members bought shares hoping to earn profits but also possibly land. -
Congressional Record- Senate.- .243
1907c CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATE.- .243 Also, petition of Jerome E. Morse, for Dick-Capron pay bill By Mr. THOMAS of North Carolina: Paper to accompany, to the Committee on Naval Affairs. bill for relief af Annie B. Berry, widow of Richard Berry-to Also, petition of Robert Stewart, for bill to equalize and fix the Committee on Invalid Pensions. pay of Army and Navy-to the Committee on Naval Affairs. By Mr.-TIRRELL: Paper to accompany bill for relief of Eli Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of George Milton S. Dunklee-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. Frye-to the Committee on rnvalid Pensions. By Mr. WANGER: Resolution of the Board of Trade of the Also, petition of Junior Order United American Mechanics, city of Chicago, against Federal uniform inspection of grain favoring restriction of immigration-to the Committee on Immi to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. gration and Naturalization. By Mr. WASHBURN : Paper to accompany bill for relief of By Mr. LIVINGSTON: Paper to accompany bill for relief o~ Mary E. Cook, Edw. M. Frissell, Joseph W. Preston, and Calvin heirs of David L. Duffey-to the Committee on War Claims. E. Breed-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. Also, papers to accompany bills for relief or Samuel E. Brat Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of John A. Taft-to ton and Elizabeth Smith-to the Committee on War Claims. the Committee on Invalid Pensions. By Mr. 1\lcKIN!\TEY: Petition of Illinois Pharmaceutical Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of Charles S. -
STAR TREK - SCOUT / DESTROYER If Printed 17 Inches Tall (From Black-Outlined Edge to Black-Outlined Edge) the Scale of These Drawings Is 1/350
STAR TREK - SCOUT / DESTROYER If printed 17 inches tall (from black-outlined edge to black-outlined edge) the scale of these drawings is 1/350. LAYOUT: PORT PROFILE PAGE 1 of 2 0 5 10 15 20 COPYRIGHT 2020 - PARAMOUNT DRAWN BY: Jim Botaitis METERS 28 feet - to match the interior 24 feet - as stated by Captain Kirk 21 feet - to match the exterior 5' 10" human 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 STANDARD SHUTTLECRAFT CARGO SHUTTLECRAFT 5 FEET 6 1/100 scale, if this page is printed at a height of 17 inches 7 SEPARATION PLANE 8 SEE NOTE "A" 9 10 11 12 13 14 SEE NOTE "F" SPACE SHUTTLE (Shown here for size reference) BACKGROUND HISTORY NOTES GENERAL NOTES Are the wide steps in Engineering considered to be "stairs"? Are the steps on the Bridge considered to be "stairs"? This project is an extrapolation of the U.S.S. ENTERPRISE drawings developed earlier this year. Those drawings were governed by If you are familiar with my ENTERPRISE plans, I started at the edge of the primary hull (see image below), where the height of 2 decks, Stairs do not appear in any episodes, but that does not mean they do not exist in Starfleet ships. Therefore: 3 criteria: (1) The 11-foot (3.3-meter) studio model, (2) The Writer's Guide, and (3) The 79 episodes. There are no such criteria to the thickness of 1 floor, and the thickness of 2 hulls have to fit in this part of the saucer. -
US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-War Classes
US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-war Classes MARK STILLE ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 210 US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 Pre-war Classes MARK STILLE ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 NAVAL STRATEGY AND THE ROLE OF THE HEAVY CRUISER 4 USN HEAVY CRUISER DESIGN AND THE NAVAL TREATIES 6 USN HEAVY CRUISER WEAPONS 8 USN HEAVY CRUISER RADAR 10 PENSACOLA CLASS 11 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service NORTHAMPTON CLASS 17 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service PORTLAND CLASS 25 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service NEW ORLEANS CLASS 30 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service WICHITA CLASS 42 t Design and Construction t Armament t Service Modifications t Wartime Service ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US HEAVY CRUISERS 1941–45 PRE-WAR CLASSES INTRODUCTION In the interwar period, the United States Navy (USN) built 18 large cruisers. These came to be known as “heavy cruisers” because of their size and later because of their armament. All of these ships were built under limitations resulting from a series of naval treaties, and thus they were also known as “treaty cruisers.” These ships gave valuable service during World War II and saw action in all the major battles in the Pacific. A separate volume will cover the heavy cruisers built during and after the war that saw service not only in 1941–45, but also later in the Korean and Vietnam conflicts. -
Kingsmill's Cruisers: the Cruiser Tradition in the Early Royal Canadian Navy
Kingsmill's Cruisers: The Cruiser Tradition in the Early Royal Canadian Navy. Kenneth P. Hansen1 Une étude des publications concernant les croiseurs de la structure de la force navale canadienne révèle un malentendu profond et répandu au sujet des rôles et des caractéristiques des nombreux types de croiseurs qu 'on a utilisés ou qu 'on a considérés comme étant utilisables au Canada. Le plan original concernant la flotte de la MRC en 1910 prévoyait centaines caractéristiques au niveau des croiseurs qu 'on peut maintenant considérer clairement, après une période intermédiaire importante, comme étant un sextant dans les frégates actuelles utilisées par la marine canadienne. Loin d'être un concept non pertinent d'une ère révolue, les caractéristiques essentielles des croiseurs de patrouille sont toutes aussi pertinentes aujourd'hui qu'elles l'étaient en 1910. Ces caractéristiques sont l'endurance, l'aptitude à la mer, les installations de commandement et de contrôle, et les emménagements utilisés en mer par le commandant et par son personnel. The RCN's ambition to acquire a "big ship navy" has resulted in charges of "institutional schizophrenia" by Canada's academic community.2 Recent scholarly research by Canadian naval officers also suggests that the post World War Two RCN was over reaching by trying to expand beyond a destroyer-based organization.3 A dichotomy is purported to exist between the need for high numbers of small escort vessels to fight recurrent anti-submarine wars in the North Atlantic and the professional navy's desire for a balanced force structure 1 The views presented in this paper are attributable solely of the author and are not to be construed in any way as declarations of policy by the Government of Canada, the Department of National Defence or the Canadian Forces, the Canadian Forces College, or any member of the Canadian Forces other than the author. -
USN Ship Designations
USN Ship Designations By Guy Derdall and Tony DiGiulian Updated 17 September 2010 Nomenclature History Warships in the United States Navy were first designated and numbered in system originating in 1895. Under this system, ships were designated as "Battleship X", "Cruiser X", "Destroyer X", "Torpedo Boat X" and so forth where X was the series hull number as authorized by the US Congress. These designations were usually abbreviated as "B-1", "C-1", "D-1", "TB-1," etc. This system became cumbersome by 1920, as many new ship types had been developed during World War I that needed new categories assigned, especially in the Auxiliary ship area. On 17 July 1920, Acting Secretary of the Navy Robert E. Coontz approved a standardized system of alpha-numeric symbols to identify ship types such that all ships were now designated with a two letter code and a hull number, with the first letter being the ship type and the second letter being the sub-type. For example, the destroyer tender USS Melville, first commissioned as "Destroyer Tender No. 2" in 1915, was now re-designated as "AD-2" with the "A" standing for Auxiliary, the "D" for Destroyer (Tender) and the "2" meaning the second ship in that series. Ship types that did not have a subclassification simply repeated the first letter. So, Battleships became "BB-X" and Destroyers became "DD-X" with X being the same number as previously assigned. Ships that changed classifications were given new hull numbers within their new designation series. The designation "USS" standing for "United States Ship" was adopted in 1907. -
Hughes and Wilson Strength
- I T- !! I! ; I. THE WASHINGTON TIMES? SATURDAY' --NOVEMBER: gMOtt.'- -' and their big black Velvet hats were playedt before a Washington audlenee, America of lecture br wwrlflrijr i trimmed each With one. groat silver rose. '"! Klve the program. , perti, faculty members and tuWnUr MONTGOMERY All the attendants wore silver slippers BABY CHRISTENED The proceeds of the entertainment wilt MISS RUTH HULL TO ITEMS OF INTEREST to be given. Trip to nearbr n(1neiv MISS and hosiery. go to swell the Washington Scholarship Ins plant will bemad. man bridegroom's Fund. Mrs. Nponan Is chairman The best was the John arrange- brother, Lieut. John MacDonald of the commute In charge of Paper PMIeepliy. ) Thompson, and the ushers were. Lieut. ments. , oh . "Phlloeophr a Chapman C. "Todd, Lieut. H. J. Wil- MBASSY v - - IN Related to Boctoioi PEC0IV1ES THE BRIDE son, Lieut. A. von 8. PI6kard, station- AT GERMAN E An Interesting audience witnessed tne WED BALDWIN SMITH AND ABOUT TOWN will be the subject of a paper to be) ed on the U. 8. 8. New York, and performance of the Washington Square read br Prof. William M. Coleman kt Lieut, l. n Ard. v. S'W.. oil cIum-mat- Players last night at the Bniasco" Thea- a meeting; of the Society for FhlloaopM of the brldcgroiTm at Annapolis, ter, Including Victor Kauffmnnn, Mr. oai inquiry, at the rumio MDrary traa class of 1)13: Richard Dnna Skinner, and Mrs, Beale R. Howard, Miss Na- afternoon at 4:46 'o'clock. Montgomery talie Magruder.'Rear and Mrs. Warwick and Outerbitdga God- Admiral ft, Montgomery, brothers of the bride, and Countess Von Bernstorff Richardson Clover nnd Miss Eudora Engagement of Army Officer's News and Gossip of Washing- Pcnnsylranlans to Meat. -
Operation: Prometheus V
FICTION OPERATION: PROMETHEUS V. 1.0 OPERATION: PROMETHEUS BY CHARLES LEWIS - 1 - Captain Naismith of the TUS Arishikage, an older Terran Union scout cruiser, was pondering the message board in his lap, when his executive officer entered the bridge. “You wanted to see me, Sir?” “Yes, Jim. New orders.” He handed the XO the message board. “Come with me. Mr. Krishnu, you have the conn.” The captain got up to leave. “I have the conn, aye, Sir,” replied the navigator. About halfway to the captain’s quarters, the XO let out a shrill low whistle, but managed to hold his tongue until they were in private. “Are they making this stuff up? They’ve got to be nuts!” “What’s so crazy about it, Jim? Seems like a good plan to me.” So absorbed was he in his reading that Jim Somerville didn’t catch the sardonic tone in his captain’s voice. “What’s so crazy about it, Sir? Well, where do I begin? We’re supposed to ID a suitable target for an ambush shortly after it has transitioned from EDT into the system. Fine, easy enough. Then, they’re going to send a Carthage class cruiser with fighter escort to distract it. And finally, they’re going to stick some poor Marines into some experimental death traps they’re calling “breaching pods” to fly over, maneuvering at drone speeds mind you, cut into the target’s hull and capture it intact. The whole thing is insane!” Captain Naismith had allowed himself the luxury of a grin while his XO ranted. -
Star Fleet Battles
STAR FLEET BATTLES R11.0 THE LYRAN STAR EMPIRE MODULE R3 (AND MOD M) MODULE C1 R11.44 LYRAN COMMANDO WAR CRUISER (CWG) R11.1 LYRAN BACKGROUND R11.R1 LYRAN “+” FLEET REFITS MODULE R3 R11.R2 LYRAN “p” FLEET REFITS R11.45 LYRAN LIGHT CARRIER TRANSPORT (LTV) R11.R3 LYRAN MECH-LINKS R11.46 LYRAN MILITARY POLICE (MP) R11.R4 LYRAN UIM REFITS R11.R5 LYRAN POWER PACK MODULE R5 R11.R6 LYRAN ESG CAPACITOR R11.47 LYRAN CAVE LION BATTLESHIP (BB) R11.2 LYRAN LION DREADNOUGHT (DN) R11.48 LYRAN SIBERIAN LION HEAVY CARRIER (CVA) R11.3 LYRAN WILDCAT BATTLECRUISER (BC) R11.49 LYRAN SIBERIAN HELLCAT (BCV) R11.4 LYRAN TIGER HEAVY CRUISER (CA) R11.50 LYRAN FIRECAT BATTLE CONTROL SHIP (BCS) R11.5 LYRAN PANTHER LIGHT CRUISER (CL) R11.51 LYRAN JAVA TIGER HEAVY COMMAND CRUISER (CCH) R11.6 LYRAN LEOPARD DESTROYER (DD) R11.52 LYRAN KING JAGUAR NEW HEAVY CRUISER (NCA) R11.7 LYRAN CHEETAH FRIGATE (FF) R11.53 LYRAN MOUNTAIN LION (DND) R11.8 LYRAN MINSWEEPER (MS) R11.54 LYRAN SPACE CONTROL PALLET (Pal-SCS) R11.9 LYRAN OCELOT SCOUT (SC) MODULE R6 (AND MOD M) R11.55 LYRAN COMMANDO DESTROYER (DDG) MODULE K R11.10 LYRAN PF TENDER (PFT) MODULE R6 R11.56 LYRAN RUNNING TIGER FAST CRUISER (CF) MODULE C1 R11.57 LYRAN ALLEYCAT-V MOBILE CARRIER (DWV) R11.11 LYRAN CHEETAH-E ESCORT FRIGATE (FFE) R11.58 LYRAN CHEETAH-R FAST CARRIER RESUPPLY FRIGATE R11.11A LYRAN CHEETAH-A AEGIS FRIGATE (FFA) (FCR) R11.12 LYRAN SIBERIAN TIGER CARRIER (CV) R11.59 LYRAN TOP-ALLEYCAT HEAVY WAR DESTROYER (HDW) R11.13 LYRAN JAGUAR WAR CRUISER (CW) R11.60 LYRAN ABYSSINIAN POLICE FLAGSHIP (FLG) R11.14 LYRAN