DOCSLIB.ORG

Barberton Nature Reserve: Phase 3, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Barberton Nature Reserve: Phase 3, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa Barberton Nature Reserve: Phase 3, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa Integrated Management Plan: 2012-2017 Facilitated and edited by Craig Gebhardt and Dereck Milburn V&L Landscape Architects Citation Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency (MTPA), 2012. Integrated Management Plan: Barberton Nature Reserve: Phase 3: Mountainlands, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa . MTPA, Nelspruit). TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ I DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... III ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................... VI ABBREVIATIONS USED FOR STATUTES (ACTS) ........................................................................................................ VII LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................. VII 1 VISION, MISSION, MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND CONSERVATION TARGETS .................................................. 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 VISION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PHASE 3: SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................... 1 1.4 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 2 1.5 DEFINING RESERVE BOUNDARIES, DISCREPANCY BETWEEN FENCELINES AND PROCLAIMED PROTECTED AREA .................................................................................................................................. 4 2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 HISTORY OF UTILISATION ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.5 HYDROLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.6 PEDOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.7 ARCHAEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.8 CLIMATE ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.9 WEATHER DATA RECORDINGS ............................................................................................................... 9 2.10 FLORA .................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.10.1 Vegetation types/veldtypes ......................................................................................................... 10 2.10.2 Plant communities ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.10.3 Plant species list ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.11 FAUNA ................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.11.1 Mammal list ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.11.2 Game ............................................................................................................................................ 12 2.11.3 Predators and Scavengers............................................................................................................ 13 2.11.4 Red Data/priority game species ................................................................................................... 13 2.11.5 Small mammals ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.11.6 Birds/Avifauna ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.11.7 Reptiles ......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.11.8 Amphibians .................................................................................................................................. 14 2.11.9 Fish and other Aquatic fauna ....................................................................................................... 14 2.11.10 Invertebrates ................................................................................................................................ 14 3 POLICY FRAMEWORK & GUIDING PRINCIPLES: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 14 3.1 FINANCIAL & HUMAN RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Management of Financial Resources ........................................................................................... 14 3.1.2 Management of Human Resources ............................................................................................. 15 3.2 SAFETY AND SECURITY ......................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT .................................................................................. 16 3.3.1 Fire Management ........................................................................................................................ 17 i 3.3.2 Alien and Invasive Species ............................................................................................................ 18 3.3.3 Catchment Management ............................................................................................................. 19 3.3.4 Soil Erosion and Control ............................................................................................................... 19 3.3.5 Wildlife Management .................................................................................................................. 20 3.3.6 Vegetation Management ............................................................................................................. 21 3.3.7 Control over Illegal Activities and Use of Natural Resources ....................................................... 21 3.3.8 Land Expansion and Incorporation .............................................................................................. 22 3.4 CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 22 3.5 VIEWSHED PROTECTION ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.6 BUFFER AREAS ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4 POLICY FRAMEWORK & GUIDING PRINCIPLES: UTILISATION MANAGEMENT .................................................... 25 4.1 COMMERCIALISATION ......................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 TOURISM MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Marketing .................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2 Linkages with other tourism initiatives ........................................................................................ 27 4.2.3 Tourism Support Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 27 4.2.4 Operational Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 28 4.2.5 Environmental Management ....................................................................................................... 28 4.2.6 Tourism Monitoring ..................................................................................................................... 29 4.3 NATURAL RESOURCE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Improving the Assessment and Implementation of the Reserve
    Towards improving the assessment and implementation of the Reserve: Real-time assessment and implementation of the Ecological Reserve Final report WRC project K8/881/2 March 2011 Sharon Pollard1 Stephen Mallory2 Edward Riddell3 Tendai Sawunyama2 1 Association for Water & Rural Development (AWARD) 2 Water for Africa (IWR Water Resources) 3 University of KwaZulu-Natal Water Research Commission Executive Summary When the Olifants River in north-east South Africa ceased flowing in 2005, widespread calls were made for an integrated focus on all of the easterly-flowing rivers of the lowveld of South Africa. These are the Luvuvhu, Letaba, Olifants, Sabie-Sand, Crocodile and Komati Rivers in Water Management Areas 2,4 and 5. Most of these rivers appeared to be deteriorating in terms of water quantity and quality despite the 1998 National Water Act (NWA). As most of the rivers flow through Kruger National Park (KNP) and all of them form part of international systems the implications of their degradation were profound and of international significance (Pollard and du Toit 2010). The aims of this study were to assess the state of compliance with the Ecological Reserve (ER) – as a benchmark for sustainability - in these rivers and some of their tributaries. It also explored the problems associated with an assessment of compliance. In short these include the lack of planning and integration of ER determination methods with operations and the difficulties associated with real-time predictions of ER requirements. These factors severely constrain planning, monitoring and the management action to mitigate non-compliance. In South Africa, the ER is defined as a function of the natural flow which, because the natural flow in a system is not known at any point in time, is creating problems with real-time implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Distribution of Freshwater Mollusca and Chemistry of the Natural Waters in Thesouth-Eastern Transvaal and Ad
    Bull. Org. mond. Sante' 1964, 30, 389-400 Bull. Wld Hith Org. | Observations on the Distribution of Freshwater Mollusca and Chemistry of the Natural Waters in the South-eastern Transvaal and Adjacent Northern Swaziland* C. H. J. SCHUTTE I & G. H. FRANK' An extensive survey of the molluscan fauna and of the chemistry of the freshwaters of the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld has revealed no simple correlation between the two. The watersfall into fourfairly distinct andgeographically associatedgroups chiefly characterized by their calcium and magnesium content. The frequency of the two intermediate hosts of bilharziasis was found to be roughly proportional to the hardness of the water but as the latter, in this area, is associated with altitude and this again with temperature and stream gradient it is thought highly probable that the distribution of these snails is the result of the interaction of a complex offactors. None of the individual chemical constituents in any of the waters examined is regarded as outside the tolerance range of these snails. It is also concluded that under natural conditions this area would have had few waterbodies suitable for colonization by these snails but that the expansion of irrigation schemes has created ideal conditions for their rapid establishment throughout the area. Primarily, the survey reported here was intended DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA as an attempt, not so much to correlate the presence The area (Fig. 1) is bordered by the Drakensberg of snails and the chemical composition of the waters escarpment in the west, the Lebombo range in the in which they occur, as to compile general ecological east, by the Sabie river in the north and the Komati data essential to further research work on the and Black Umbuluzi rivers in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecostatus of the Crocodile River Catchment, Inkomati River System
    33FRECOSTATUS OF THE CROCODILE RIVER CATCHMENT, INKOMATI RIVER SYSTEM Submitted to: INKOMATI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY Compiled by: MPUMALANGA TOURISM AND PARKS AGENCY Scientific Services: Aquatic & Herpetology Contributors: CJ Kleynhans (DWA); C Thirion (DWA); F Roux (MTPA); A Hoffmann (MTPA); H Marais (MTPA); G Diedericks (Environmental Biomonitoring); Editors: Francois Roux and Marcus Selepe Date: December 2013 Eco-status of the Crocodile River Catchments, Incomati River System Acknowledgements Technical contributions: • Dr Neels Kleynhans (RQS - DWA) • Christa Thirion (RQS - DWA) • Dr Andrew Deacon (SANParks) • Hendrik Sithole (SANParks) • Gerhard Diedericks (Environmental Biomonitoring) • Dr John Simaika (University of Stellenbosch) • MTPA Scientific Services Biomonitoring Team o Francois Roux o Andre Hoffmann o Hannes Marais o Ronell Niemand o Richard Similane o Heather Aspeling o Petrus Mapopha List of Abbreviations DWA - RQS = Department Water Affairs - Resource Quality Services FRAI = Fish Response Assessment Index GPS = Global Positioning System m a.s.l. = metres above sea level KNP = Kruger National Park MIRAI = Macro-invertebrate Response Assessment Index PES = Present Ecological State RHP = River Health Programme SASS5 = South African Scoring System, Version 5 SQ = Subquatenary SQR = Subquatenary River September 2013 2 Eco-status of the Crocodile River Catchments, Incomati River System 1. INTRODUCTION The ICMA appointed the MTPA as service provider to conduct biomonitoring within the Crocodile River catchment on the 2012/2013 budget to determine the Present Ecostatus of this river system. Biomonitoring in the Crocodile River was conducted during 2012/2013, with the last formal biomonitoring on the Crocodile River last being conducted during 1998 (Hill et.al. (WRC report no.850/2/01)). During the 2012/13 survey fifty-seven sites were sampled in the Crocodile River and its tributaries, including the Elands River, Houtbosloop, Lunsklip, Alex’s se loop, Noord Kaap, Suid Kaap and Queens Rivers (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 HIA for the Farm Boerlands, Barberton
    SPECIALIST REPORT PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL / HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE CLEARANCE OF VEGETATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF MACADAMIA FARMING ON PORTION 3 OF THE FARM BOERLANDS 631JT, BARBERTON CITY OF MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE REPORT COMPILED FOR CORE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Ms. ANNE-MARI WHITE Cell: 0608781591 / e-mail: [email protected] MAY 2020 ADANSONIA HERITAGE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGISTS C. VAN WYK ROWE E-MAIL: [email protected] Tel: 0828719553 / Fax: 0867151639 P.O. BOX 75, PILGRIM'S REST, 1290 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) regarding archaeological and other cultural heritage resources was conducted on the footprint for the proposed agricultural development on portion 3 of the farm BOERLANDS 631JT, Barberton. The study area is located approximately 15 km west of the town of Barberton, on the R38 provincial route. Topographical images of 1968 and 1984 indicate the footprint of the proposed site (maps 1:50 000, 2530 DD). This area falls under the jurisdictions of the Ehlanzeni District Municipality, and City of Mbombela local municipality, Mpumalanga Province. The National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 (1999), (NHRA), protects all heritage resources, which are classified as national estate. The NHRA stipulates that any person who intends to undertake a development, is subjected to the provisions of the Act. The applicant, MS TECK FARMING (Pty) Ltd in co-operation with CORE Environmental Services, is proposing the development of agricultural fields (macadamia) on 19.5ha of vegetation. The proposed study area is covered with invasive vegetation which restricted visibility. The specialist biodiversity report of AFRIKA ENVIRO & BIOLOGY, is of the opinion that the dominance by alien invasive vegetation on the study area is an indicator that the land was cultivated or afforested in the distant past.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibiya BK 25493728.Pdf
    Geo-environmental and physical risk associated with the derelict and ownerless gold mines from Transvaal- Drakensberg and Barberton Greenstone Belt Gold Fields, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa Bonginkosi Knowlege Sibiya orcid.org 0000-0002-5547-9974 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science in Environmental Sciences at the North-West University Supervisor: Dr DM van Tonder Co-supervisor: Prof TC Davies Graduation July 2019 25493728 DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is my own original work and that I have not submitted in previously in its entirety or in part to any other university or intuition. Signature: Date: ii OPSOMMING Histories het myne ‘n slegte reputasie gehad vir die aanspreek van omgewings- en veiligheidskwessies tydens en na mynbou aktiwiteit. Myngebiede is gesluit sonder dat daar enige aksie onderneem is om die gebied te herstel met gevolg dat groot oop putte, ongeseëlde skagte gevul met water, verspreide besoedeling, en verlate slikdamme. Die huidige navorsing het deel gevorm van die groter nasionale projek wat gefokus het op die beoordeling van omgewings- en fisiese risiko's wat verband hou met verlate en eienaarlose myne van alle kommoditeite. Goudmyne van twee geologiese eenhede naamlik; die Barberton Greenstone Belt en die Transvaalse Drakensberg Gold Field is gekies vir die studie as 'n streeksbenadering in risiko-gradering van verlate myne uit hierdie goudvelde vir rehabilitasie prioritisering. Die primêre doel van hierdie studie was om die potensiële omgewings, openbare veiligheids, en gesondheids gevare wat deur die verlate en eienaarlose myne van die Barberton Greenstone Belt en die Transvaalse Drakensberg-goudveld gelei het, te identifiseer en te vergelyk.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Impacts on the Aquatic Ecosystems of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Scientific African 6 (2019) e00195 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientific African journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sciaf Pollution impacts on the aquatic ecosystems of the Kruger National Park, South Africa ∗ Eddie S. Riddell a,b, , Danny Govender a,c, Judith Botha a, Hendrik Sithole a, Robin M. Petersen a, Purvance Shikwambana a a South African National Parks, Kruger National Park, Skukuza, South Africa b Centre for Water Resources Research, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa c Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The Kruger National Park (KNP) is a savanna ecosystem situated in the middle reaches of Received 17 January 2019 five large, dynamic and biologically diverse transboundary river systems. The KNP has been Revised 20 August 2019 at the forefront of applied river ecosystems research for over 30 years. Meanwhile each of Accepted 9 October 2019 its rivers has a unique set of challenges from both a river flow and water quality manage- ment perspective. These have often arisen from anthropogenic changes in the catchments Keywords: of the park. The resultant challenges give rise to an array of effects that bear upon the Rivers parks’ ability to maintain the viability of aquatic ecosystems in a large and bio-diverse Diffuse pollution landscape. Crocodiles This paper sets the scene through a synopsis of the investments made by the KNP to Sediments improve river management practices and the present status-quo of these aquatic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Rivers Report Obtainable From
    State of the Rivers Report Obtainable from: Water Research Commission PO Box 824 PRETORIA 0001 ISBN: 1 86845 689 7 Printed in the Republic of South Africa Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. r State of the Rivers Report Crocodile, Sahie-Stznd & Olifants River Systems A report of the River Health Programme http://www.csir.co.za/rhp/ WRC Report No, IT 147/01 March 2001 Participating Organisations ami Programmes Department ofWater Affairs and forestry Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Water Research Commission CSIR Etivironmentek Mpumatanga Parks Hoard Krtiger \ational Park Working for Water Programme (Atpitma/anga) Biomonitoring Serrices Steering Group Steve Mitchell Henk van Vliet Rudi Pretorius Alison I low man Joban de Beer Editorial Team Anna Balhince Liesl Hill Dirk Roux Mike Silherhauer Wilma Strydom Technical Contributions Andrew Deacon Gerhard Diedericks Joban Fngelbrecht Neels K/eynhaus Anton Linstrb'm Tony Poulter Francois Roux Christa Thirion Photographs Allan Batcl.wtor Andrew Deacon Anuelise (,'erher Neels Kleynhans Liesl Hill Johann Mey Dirk Roux loretta Steyn Wilma Strydom F.rnita van Wyk Design Loretta Steyn Graphic Design Studio Contents The Hirer Health Programme 7 A new Witter Act for South Africa 2 An Overview of the Study Area 4 River Indicators and Indices 6 Indices in this Report 8 The Crocodile River System Ecoregions and River Characteristics . 10 Present Ecological State 12 Drirers <>t Eco/miii/i/ Ch/un'i' 14 Desired Ecological State 16 The Sabie-Sand River System Ecoregions and River Characteristics .
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Resources, Rural Livelihoods Working Paper 12
    Rural Resources, Rural livelihoods Working Paper 12 Implementation of South Africa’s National Water Act. Catchment Management Agencies: Interests, Access and Efficiency. Inkomati Basin Pilot Study Philip Woodhouse IDPM, University of Manchester, UK Rashid Hassan Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Pretoria, South Africa April 1999 Originally prepared for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa, and DFID – Southern Africa (Department for International Development, UK) 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Existing Water Use 3.1 General Characteristics of the Inkomati Basin WMA 3.2 Existing and Projected Water Use 3.3 Projected Water Supply in Relation to Demand 4. Assessment of Economic Efficiency of Water Use 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Direct Economic Benefits – DEB 4.3 Indirect and Total Economic Benefits 4.4 Conclusions and Limitation s of the Economic Efficiency Analysis 4.5 Risk Issues in Alternative Production Systems 4.6 Current water tariffs and efficiency allocation instruments in the Inkomati basin 5. Existing institutions governing access to water 5.1 Water Legislation 5.2 The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 5.3 Irrigation Boards 5.4 Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture 5.5 Sabie River Working Group 6. Changes under the National Water Act 7. Implementing Catchment Management Agencies 7.1 Introduction 7.2 The Consultative Process: Water Catchment Forums 7.3 Water Quality Management 7.4 Representation Issues 7.5 Development Strategies and Trade-offs References Tables Maps 2 Implementation of the National Water Act Catchment Management Agencies: Interests, Access and Efficiency Inkomati Basin Pilot Study 1. Executive Summary South Africa’s National Water Act of 1998 radically changed the rules governing access to water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of South Africa, 2012 Study (Wr2012)
    8"5&33&4063$&40'4065)"'3*$" 456%: 83 7PMVNF6TFShT(VJEF ",#BJMFZ871JUNBO 77 WATER RESOURCES OF SOUTH AFRICA, 2012 STUDY (WR2012) WR2012 Study User’s Guide Report to the Water Research Commission by AK Bailey and WV Pitman Royal HaskoningDHV (Pty) Ltd WRC Report No. TT 684/16 August 2016 Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled Water Resources of South Africa, 2012 (WR2012) (WRC Project No. K5/2143/1). This report forms part of a series of nine reports. The reports are: 1. WR2012 Executive Summary (WRC Report No. TT 683/16) 2. WR2012 User Guide (WRC Report No. TT 684/16 – this report) 3. WR2012 Book of Maps (WRC Report No. TT 685/16) 4. WR2012 Calibration Accuracy (WRC Report No TT 686/16t) 5. WR2012 SAMI Groundwater module: Verification Studies, Default Parameters and Calibration Guide (WRC Report No. TT 687/16) 6. WR2012 SALMOD: Salinity Modelling of the Upper Vaal, Middle Vaal and Lower Vaal sub-Water Management Areas (new Vaal Water Management Area) (WRC Report No. TT 688/16) 7. WRSM/Pitman User Manual (WRC Report No. TT 689/16) 8. WRSM/Pitman Theory Manual (WRC Report No. TT 690/16) 9. WRSM/Pitman Programmer’s Code Manual WRC Report No. TT 691/16) DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF THE PESTICIDE AND METAL LEVELS PRESENT IN POPULATIONS OF THE LARGER INDIGENOUS FISH SPECIES OF SELECTED SOUTH AFRICAN RIVERS by RGM Heath* and M Claassen Division of Water, Environment and Forestry Technology, C S I R WRC Report No 428/1/99 ISBN No 186845 5807 WRC Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi TERMS OF REFERENCE xlix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS li 1. INTRODUCTION i 1.1 Water in South Africa 1 1.2 Use and Fate of Pesticides in the Environment 2 1.3 Fate of Metals in the Environment 4 1.4 Biological Monitoring 5 1.5 Fish as Biological Monitors 8 1.6 Why Was This Study Undertaken? 10 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREAS 11 2.1 The Letaba River 11 2.2 The Sabie River 18 2.3 The Crocodile River 19 2.4 The Luvuvhu River 21 2.5 The Olifants River 25 2.6 The Berg River 28 3. MATERIAL AND METHODS 32 3.1 Water Quality 32 3.2 Fish Sample Collection, Preservation and Detection of Metals and Pesticides .... 32 3.3 Prediction of Pesticide Usage 39 3.4 Human Health Risk Assessment 40 3.5 Statistics 43 4. RESULTS 44 4.1 Water Quality 44 4.1.1 Temperature 44 4.1.2 Conductivity 44 4.1.3 pH . ' 45 4.1.4 Dissolved oxygen 45 4.1.5 Nutrients (ortho-phosphate, nitrite, nitrate) 45 4.1.6 Sulphate 45 4.1.7 Chloride 45 4.1.8 Metals 46 Pesticide and Metals in Fish WRC Repon Page 4.2 Fish Species Caught 46 4.3 Fish Biology (Length, Weight, Age, Gonadotrophic Index and Bioconcen- tration Factor) 51 4.3.1 Regression of standard length and weight 51 4.3.2 Bioconcentration factors (BCF) 53 4.4 Stomach Content Analysis 54 4.5
    [Show full text]
  • February 2018
    A PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF TWO TENTED CAMPS AT SONGIMVELO NATURE RESERVE, EERSTEHOEK, ON THE FARMS LAAGGENOEG 158IT & ONVERWACHT 733IT MPUMALANGA PROVINCE REPORT COMPILED FOR UMSINSI ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Ms. RIA WILKEN P.O. Box 8163, SONPARK NELSPRUIT, 1206 Tel: 082 3386 934 / Fax: 086 6304 313 / e-mail: [email protected] FEBRUARY 2018 ADANSONIA HERITAGE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGISTS C. VAN WYK ROWE E-MAIL: [email protected] Tel: 0828719553 / Fax: 0867151639 P.O. BOX 75, PILGRIM'S REST, 1290 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment (AIA & HIA) was conducted on the Songimvelo Nature Reserve for two new Tented camp developments. Songimvelo is situated on several farms (Josefsdal, Mendon, Noisy, Schoonoord, Goedehoop, Sedan, Vooruitsicht and Duurstede), but the Tented Camp developments are proposed on the farms Laaggenoeg 158IT and Onverwacht 733IT. Songimvelo is approximately 32 km from the town of Badplaas. The Nature Reserve borders YORK’s Taurus Plantation to the north, Swaziland directly to the east and Tjakastad in the west. The study area is situated on topographical maps 1:50 000, 2530DD (NELSHOOGTE), & 2630BB (LOCHIEL), which are in the Mpumalanga Province. This area falls within the Badplaas region under the jurisdictions of the Gert Sibande District Municipality, and Albert Luthuli Local Municipality. The National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 (1999)(NHRA), protects all heritage resources, which are classified as national estate. The NHRA stipulates that any person who intends to undertake a development, is subjected to the provisions of the Act. The aims of this study were to do a surface investigation for possible graves, archaeological and / or historical remains on the two locations which were identified for Tented Camp developments, and to recommend mitigation measures if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Flood Frequency Analaysis in Southern Africa
    Master Thesis, Department of Geosciences Regional Flood Frequency Analaysis in Southern Africa Alem Tadesse Haile 1200 T3H007 /s) 3 1000 800 600 400 Quantile Flood (m Flood Quantile 200 Observed Regional curve (LN3) 0 1 10 100 Return Period , T (years) Regional Flood Frequency Analaysis in Southern Africa Alem Tadesse Haile Master Thesis in Geosciences Discipline: Hydrology Department of Geosciences Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 1. September 2011 © Alem Tadesse Haile, 2011 Supervisors: Lars Gottschalk (UiO) and Lena M. Tallaksen (UiO) This work is published digitally through DUO – Digitale Utgivelser ved UiO http://www.duo.uio.no It is also catalogued in BIBSYS (http://www.bibsys.no/english) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover photo: the photograph of Mzimvubu River at Ku-Makuhola gauging site (T3H007): from http://www.dwaf.gov.za/Hydrology/CGI-BIN/HIS/CGIHis.exe/Photo?Station=T3H007 (Retrieved, 28/08/2011) and the lower graph indicates the distribution of the AMS of the river (from1972-2008). Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Prof. Lars Gottschalk and Prof. Lena M. Tallaksen for their consistent supervision, crucial advices, invaluable suggestions and unreserved cooperation throughout the project work and the preparation of the thesis. Their support and encouragement from the beginning up to the completion of this study is kindly appreciated. I also express my deep gratitude and appreciation to Prof. Chong-Yu Xu, for his kind supports in data collections and communications during the project work.
    [Show full text]