DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Assessment of the Crocodile River, Mpumalanga

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Risk Assessment of the Crocodile River, Mpumalanga Flood Risk Assessment of the Crocodile River, Mpumalanga By: Siyasanga Sauka Student No: 0504584n Supervisor: Prof. Jasper Knight A dissertation submitted to the School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2016 Student No: 0504584n DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Science at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other university. ___________________________________ Signed by: Miss S. Sauka (0504584n) i Student No: 0504584n ABSTRACT The Crocodile River East in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa, has seen three major floods in a twenty-four-month period, specifically January 2011, January 2012 and January 2013. The damage included the loss of life, damage and/or loss of public or private properties, agricultural land loss, and damage to biodiversity and river geomorphology. The purpose of this study was to understand the consequences and risks to livelihoods and river basin systems due to flooding of the river. The study focused on a segment of the Crocodile River East, between Riverside and Tekwane. The study used historic hydro-climatic data for the Crocodile River to determine the critical threshold for past flood events and to predict the extent of future flood events. Hydrological modelling coupled with the HEC-RAS hydraulic model enabled the simulation of these future flood events. The use of orthophotos and digital elevation models (DEMs) allowed for a spatial representation of the areas affected during the flood events. Flood hazard maps and flood risk maps were then developed for the identified flood events within a Geographical Information System (GIS). The maps enabled the identification of high risk and flood prone areas along this segment of the Crocodile River Basin. The results showed that when discharge reaches 241.75 m3/s, both locations (Riverside and Tekwane) are at risk to flooding. This is therefore the threshold for which the two locations are likely to be flooded. This study provides a methodology to determine the spatial extent of past and modelled future river flood events. As such, outcomes of this study may aid in the understanding of flood hazard extent and flood prone areas, and may thus help catchment management authorities and institutions in flood reconstruction and flood risk management. The employed methodology can aid effective spatial planning, and can also be extended at the basin scale through integration with the existent flood warning system to gain an estimate of flood extent and flood risk. ii Student No: 0504584n ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank Prof. Jasper Knight for his valuable support and constantly guiding me throughout this research. In particular, I would like to thank him for providing critical and valuable comments and advice that informed this research. In spite of my relocation, he was accommodative and extremely adaptable, for which I will forever be grateful for. His help has been indispensable and I cannot imagine how I would have achieved this research without his guidance, patience and support. I would like to thank the NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Centre User Services and the Customer Services Department at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) for their assistance with obtaining Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) for my research. Your assistant with the various packages and with navigating the USGS website was indispensable. And lastly, I would also like to thank the Department of Water Sanitation (DWS) for making hydrological and meteorological data available on their website, without which this study would have been impossible. iii Student No: 0504584n CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. III LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................ VII LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... IX 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem Statement ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Research Question, Aims and Objectives .............................................................. 5 1.2.1 Research Question.......................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Research Aims ................................................................................................ 5 1.2.3 Research Objectives ....................................................................................... 6 1.3 Research Methodology ........................................................................................... 6 1.4 Structure of Dissertation .......................................................................................... 8 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................. 10 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Flood Typology ...................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Flood Prone Areas ........................................................................................ 12 2.2.2 Flood Frequency ........................................................................................... 12 2.3 Causes of Floods .................................................................................................. 13 2.3.1 Weather Systems .......................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Land-Use and River Basin Characteristics ................................................... 15 2.4 Flood Risk ............................................................................................................. 18 2.4.1 Flood Risk Framework .................................................................................. 18 2.4.2 Flood Risk Assessment ................................................................................. 24 2.5 Flood Distribution and Flood Mapping .................................................................. 26 2.5.1 Hydrological Modelling .................................................................................. 27 2.5.2 Hydraulic Modelling ....................................................................................... 32 2.5.3 Geographical Information Systems ............................................................... 37 2.5.4 Flood Hazard Mapping .................................................................................. 39 2.6 Floods under Changing Climate Futures .............................................................. 41 2.6.1 Southern Africa .............................................................................................. 42 2.6.2 South Africa ................................................................................................... 44 2.6.3 Mpumalanga Province .................................................................................. 46 2.6.4 Limitations and Uncertainties of Future Climate Projections ........................ 48 2.7 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 49 3. STUDY AREA ............................................................................................ 50 3.1 General Description of Study Area........................................................................ 50 3.2 Physical Properties of the Study Area .................................................................. 52 3.2.1 Topography ................................................................................................... 52 3.2.2 Geology ......................................................................................................... 54 iv Student No: 0504584n 3.2.3 Soil Typology ................................................................................................. 55 3.2.4 Ecology .......................................................................................................... 56 3.2.5 Land Cover and Land Use Typology............................................................. 56 3.2.6 Settlement Patterns ....................................................................................... 57 3.3 Climatological Properties of the Study Area ......................................................... 58 3.3.1 Rainfall .......................................................................................................... 58 3.3.2 Temperature .................................................................................................. 60 3.4 Hydrological Properties of the Study Area ............................................................ 61 3.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 62 4. DATA ACQUISITION, ANALYSIS AND METHODOLOGY .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Improving the Assessment and Implementation of the Reserve
    Towards improving the assessment and implementation of the Reserve: Real-time assessment and implementation of the Ecological Reserve Final report WRC project K8/881/2 March 2011 Sharon Pollard1 Stephen Mallory2 Edward Riddell3 Tendai Sawunyama2 1 Association for Water & Rural Development (AWARD) 2 Water for Africa (IWR Water Resources) 3 University of KwaZulu-Natal Water Research Commission Executive Summary When the Olifants River in north-east South Africa ceased flowing in 2005, widespread calls were made for an integrated focus on all of the easterly-flowing rivers of the lowveld of South Africa. These are the Luvuvhu, Letaba, Olifants, Sabie-Sand, Crocodile and Komati Rivers in Water Management Areas 2,4 and 5. Most of these rivers appeared to be deteriorating in terms of water quantity and quality despite the 1998 National Water Act (NWA). As most of the rivers flow through Kruger National Park (KNP) and all of them form part of international systems the implications of their degradation were profound and of international significance (Pollard and du Toit 2010). The aims of this study were to assess the state of compliance with the Ecological Reserve (ER) – as a benchmark for sustainability - in these rivers and some of their tributaries. It also explored the problems associated with an assessment of compliance. In short these include the lack of planning and integration of ER determination methods with operations and the difficulties associated with real-time predictions of ER requirements. These factors severely constrain planning, monitoring and the management action to mitigate non-compliance. In South Africa, the ER is defined as a function of the natural flow which, because the natural flow in a system is not known at any point in time, is creating problems with real-time implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Fishes in the Elands River, Mpumalanga, South Africa: Past, Present and Future
    Page 1 of 8 Original Research Conservation of fishes in the Elands River, Mpumalanga, South Africa: Past, present and future Authors: In an isolated reach, between two large natural waterfalls in the Elands River in Mpumalanga, 1,2 Gordon C. O’Brien populations of a critically endangered Kneria sp., the endangered Chiloglanis bifurcus and a Nico J. Smit1 genetically unique population of Labeobarbus polylepis occur. The aim of this article was to Victor Wepener1 evaluate past efforts to conserve these fishes, describe the current status and propose future Affiliations: conservation and management actions. The population status assessments were based on a 1Unit for Environmental series of fish community composition and population structure evaluations from surveys Sciences and Management, undertaken at 22 sites during seven surveys from 2002 to 2006. Although water-use activities North-West University, South Africa have continued to increase in the area, impacts have been offset by conservation efforts initiated almost 30 years ago. The existing C. bifurcus population appears to be stable, which 2Department of Zoology, is reflected in the downgrading of the conservation status of the species from critically University of Johannesburg, endangered to endangered. The abundance of the kneriid population appears to be increasing South Africa and spreading to other tributaries in the study area. The abundance of L. polylepis appears to Correspondence to: be increasing but has still not reached historical levels. Gordon O’Brien Conservation implications: Continued conservation efforts are required to protect these Email: fishes. This case study presented a rare example of how the impacts associated with the use of [email protected] aquatic resources in South Africa can successfully be offset by conservation efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme 25 Year Publication
    WWF-MONDI WETLANDS PROGRammE B A quarter century of C wetlandconservation 1 Dragonflies are indicators of healthy wetlands. © PETER ChaDwiCK What’s in a name? Over the course of its 25-year journey, the now WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme has changed its name three times. 1991–2000: 2013–present: Rennies Wetland Project WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme The programme was named after the Rennies In late 2013, the management and implementation Group – the primary funder at the start – and was of the programme was transferred from WESSA managed and implemented by Ezemvelo KZN to WWF-SA. It formed an integral part of the new Wildlife (then the Natal Parks Board) from 1991 to global partnership between WWF and Mondi 1995, with WESSA taking over in 1996. and was formally renamed the WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme. 2001–2012: WWF and Mondi acknowledge and thank all the Mondi Wetlands Programme previous funders and conservation management The programme’s name changed in 2001 when agencies for their roles and contributions in Mondi became the primary funder. WESSA was initiating, shaping and growing the success of still the lead management agency, with strategic the programme. support from WWF-SA in guiding the programme and expanding its global reach. In this publication, the programme is referred to by its current name, i.e. the WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme (WWF-MWP). 2 Foreword 12 Supporting the wise use of communal wetlands 36 Message from Morné du Plessis CEO: WWF-SA 4 13 Growing young wetland and environmental professionals through Message from Ron
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Anthropogenic Impacts Affecting the Elands River, Mpumalanga
    A study into the anthropogenic impacts affecting the Elands River, Mpumalanga. BY MARTIN FERREIRA DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MAGISTER SCIENTIAE IN AQUATIC HEALTH IN THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROF. JHJ VAN VUREN CO – SUPERVISOR: PROF. V WEPENE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Met dank en lof aan my Almagtige Skepper en Hemelse Vader, want “ ’n mens kan sy voornemens hê, maar die laaste word daaroor kom van die Here af ” (Spreuke 16:1) I would like to thank and acknowledge with appreciation the following people and institutions: My parents and my sisters, for their continuous love and support, especially my farther who has given me every opportunity to better myself. My supervisors Professor Van Vuuren and Professor Wepener for their leadership and support. A special thank you to prof Vic whose door is always open for all students, no matter how small the problem. Gordon O’Brien for his leadership and giving me this opportunity. The WRC and the University of Johannesburg for providing funding and equipment to complete the study. I would also like to thank my Paper Mill study team: Wynand, Cameron, Irene and Riaan. You started out as my colleges and ended up being great friends. Oom Giel and Tannie Louisa for everything they have done for me, and making it possible for me to complete my studies. A final thank you to Maryke Coetzee for loving me, supporting me and putting up with me despite myself. - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENT List of Tables 7 List of Figures 10 Summary 17 Opsomming
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Distribution of Freshwater Mollusca and Chemistry of the Natural Waters in Thesouth-Eastern Transvaal and Ad
    Bull. Org. mond. Sante' 1964, 30, 389-400 Bull. Wld Hith Org. | Observations on the Distribution of Freshwater Mollusca and Chemistry of the Natural Waters in the South-eastern Transvaal and Adjacent Northern Swaziland* C. H. J. SCHUTTE I & G. H. FRANK' An extensive survey of the molluscan fauna and of the chemistry of the freshwaters of the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld has revealed no simple correlation between the two. The watersfall into fourfairly distinct andgeographically associatedgroups chiefly characterized by their calcium and magnesium content. The frequency of the two intermediate hosts of bilharziasis was found to be roughly proportional to the hardness of the water but as the latter, in this area, is associated with altitude and this again with temperature and stream gradient it is thought highly probable that the distribution of these snails is the result of the interaction of a complex offactors. None of the individual chemical constituents in any of the waters examined is regarded as outside the tolerance range of these snails. It is also concluded that under natural conditions this area would have had few waterbodies suitable for colonization by these snails but that the expansion of irrigation schemes has created ideal conditions for their rapid establishment throughout the area. Primarily, the survey reported here was intended DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA as an attempt, not so much to correlate the presence The area (Fig. 1) is bordered by the Drakensberg of snails and the chemical composition of the waters escarpment in the west, the Lebombo range in the in which they occur, as to compile general ecological east, by the Sabie river in the north and the Komati data essential to further research work on the and Black Umbuluzi rivers in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecostatus of the Crocodile River Catchment, Inkomati River System
    33FRECOSTATUS OF THE CROCODILE RIVER CATCHMENT, INKOMATI RIVER SYSTEM Submitted to: INKOMATI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY Compiled by: MPUMALANGA TOURISM AND PARKS AGENCY Scientific Services: Aquatic & Herpetology Contributors: CJ Kleynhans (DWA); C Thirion (DWA); F Roux (MTPA); A Hoffmann (MTPA); H Marais (MTPA); G Diedericks (Environmental Biomonitoring); Editors: Francois Roux and Marcus Selepe Date: December 2013 Eco-status of the Crocodile River Catchments, Incomati River System Acknowledgements Technical contributions: • Dr Neels Kleynhans (RQS - DWA) • Christa Thirion (RQS - DWA) • Dr Andrew Deacon (SANParks) • Hendrik Sithole (SANParks) • Gerhard Diedericks (Environmental Biomonitoring) • Dr John Simaika (University of Stellenbosch) • MTPA Scientific Services Biomonitoring Team o Francois Roux o Andre Hoffmann o Hannes Marais o Ronell Niemand o Richard Similane o Heather Aspeling o Petrus Mapopha List of Abbreviations DWA - RQS = Department Water Affairs - Resource Quality Services FRAI = Fish Response Assessment Index GPS = Global Positioning System m a.s.l. = metres above sea level KNP = Kruger National Park MIRAI = Macro-invertebrate Response Assessment Index PES = Present Ecological State RHP = River Health Programme SASS5 = South African Scoring System, Version 5 SQ = Subquatenary SQR = Subquatenary River September 2013 2 Eco-status of the Crocodile River Catchments, Incomati River System 1. INTRODUCTION The ICMA appointed the MTPA as service provider to conduct biomonitoring within the Crocodile River catchment on the 2012/2013 budget to determine the Present Ecostatus of this river system. Biomonitoring in the Crocodile River was conducted during 2012/2013, with the last formal biomonitoring on the Crocodile River last being conducted during 1998 (Hill et.al. (WRC report no.850/2/01)). During the 2012/13 survey fifty-seven sites were sampled in the Crocodile River and its tributaries, including the Elands River, Houtbosloop, Lunsklip, Alex’s se loop, Noord Kaap, Suid Kaap and Queens Rivers (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 HIA for the Farm Boerlands, Barberton
    SPECIALIST REPORT PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL / HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE CLEARANCE OF VEGETATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF MACADAMIA FARMING ON PORTION 3 OF THE FARM BOERLANDS 631JT, BARBERTON CITY OF MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE REPORT COMPILED FOR CORE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Ms. ANNE-MARI WHITE Cell: 0608781591 / e-mail: [email protected] MAY 2020 ADANSONIA HERITAGE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGISTS C. VAN WYK ROWE E-MAIL: [email protected] Tel: 0828719553 / Fax: 0867151639 P.O. BOX 75, PILGRIM'S REST, 1290 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) regarding archaeological and other cultural heritage resources was conducted on the footprint for the proposed agricultural development on portion 3 of the farm BOERLANDS 631JT, Barberton. The study area is located approximately 15 km west of the town of Barberton, on the R38 provincial route. Topographical images of 1968 and 1984 indicate the footprint of the proposed site (maps 1:50 000, 2530 DD). This area falls under the jurisdictions of the Ehlanzeni District Municipality, and City of Mbombela local municipality, Mpumalanga Province. The National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 (1999), (NHRA), protects all heritage resources, which are classified as national estate. The NHRA stipulates that any person who intends to undertake a development, is subjected to the provisions of the Act. The applicant, MS TECK FARMING (Pty) Ltd in co-operation with CORE Environmental Services, is proposing the development of agricultural fields (macadamia) on 19.5ha of vegetation. The proposed study area is covered with invasive vegetation which restricted visibility. The specialist biodiversity report of AFRIKA ENVIRO & BIOLOGY, is of the opinion that the dominance by alien invasive vegetation on the study area is an indicator that the land was cultivated or afforested in the distant past.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends
    A Newsletter for Manzi’s Water Wise Club Members May 2016 Rivers of South Africa Hi Friends, This month we are exploring our rivers. We may take them for granted but they offer us great services. Rivers provide a home and food to a variety of animals. You will find lots of plants, insects, birds, freshwater animals and land animals near and in a river. You can say rivers are rich with different kinds of living things. These living things play different roles such as cleaning the river and providing food in the river for other animals. Rivers carry water and nutrients and they play an important part in the water cycle. We use rivers for water supply which we use for drinking, in our homes, watering in farms, making products in factories and generating electricity. Sailing, taking goods from one place to another and water sports such as swimming, skiing and fishing happens in most rivers. Have you ever wondered where rivers begin and end? Well friends, rivers begin high in the mountains or hills, or where a natural spring releases water from underground. They usually end by flowing into the ocean, sea or lake. The place where the river enters the ocean, sea or lake is called the mouth of the river. Usually there are lots of different living things there. Some rivers form tributaries of other rivers. A tributary is a stream or river that feeds into a larger stream or river. South Africa has the following major rivers: . Orange River (Lesotho, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Limpopo River (Limpopo Province), Vaal River (Mpumalanga, Gauteng, Free State & Northern Cape Provinces), Thukela River reprinted with permission withreprinted (Kwa-Zulu Natal Province), Olifants River – (Mpumalanga & Limpopo Provinces), Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibiya BK 25493728.Pdf
    Geo-environmental and physical risk associated with the derelict and ownerless gold mines from Transvaal- Drakensberg and Barberton Greenstone Belt Gold Fields, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa Bonginkosi Knowlege Sibiya orcid.org 0000-0002-5547-9974 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science in Environmental Sciences at the North-West University Supervisor: Dr DM van Tonder Co-supervisor: Prof TC Davies Graduation July 2019 25493728 DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is my own original work and that I have not submitted in previously in its entirety or in part to any other university or intuition. Signature: Date: ii OPSOMMING Histories het myne ‘n slegte reputasie gehad vir die aanspreek van omgewings- en veiligheidskwessies tydens en na mynbou aktiwiteit. Myngebiede is gesluit sonder dat daar enige aksie onderneem is om die gebied te herstel met gevolg dat groot oop putte, ongeseëlde skagte gevul met water, verspreide besoedeling, en verlate slikdamme. Die huidige navorsing het deel gevorm van die groter nasionale projek wat gefokus het op die beoordeling van omgewings- en fisiese risiko's wat verband hou met verlate en eienaarlose myne van alle kommoditeite. Goudmyne van twee geologiese eenhede naamlik; die Barberton Greenstone Belt en die Transvaalse Drakensberg Gold Field is gekies vir die studie as 'n streeksbenadering in risiko-gradering van verlate myne uit hierdie goudvelde vir rehabilitasie prioritisering. Die primêre doel van hierdie studie was om die potensiële omgewings, openbare veiligheids, en gesondheids gevare wat deur die verlate en eienaarlose myne van die Barberton Greenstone Belt en die Transvaalse Drakensberg-goudveld gelei het, te identifiseer en te vergelyk.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Impacts on the Aquatic Ecosystems of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
    Scientific African 6 (2019) e00195 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientific African journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sciaf Pollution impacts on the aquatic ecosystems of the Kruger National Park, South Africa ∗ Eddie S. Riddell a,b, , Danny Govender a,c, Judith Botha a, Hendrik Sithole a, Robin M. Petersen a, Purvance Shikwambana a a South African National Parks, Kruger National Park, Skukuza, South Africa b Centre for Water Resources Research, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa c Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The Kruger National Park (KNP) is a savanna ecosystem situated in the middle reaches of Received 17 January 2019 five large, dynamic and biologically diverse transboundary river systems. The KNP has been Revised 20 August 2019 at the forefront of applied river ecosystems research for over 30 years. Meanwhile each of Accepted 9 October 2019 its rivers has a unique set of challenges from both a river flow and water quality manage- ment perspective. These have often arisen from anthropogenic changes in the catchments Keywords: of the park. The resultant challenges give rise to an array of effects that bear upon the Rivers parks’ ability to maintain the viability of aquatic ecosystems in a large and bio-diverse Diffuse pollution landscape. Crocodiles This paper sets the scene through a synopsis of the investments made by the KNP to Sediments improve river management practices and the present status-quo of these aquatic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Rivers Report Obtainable From
    State of the Rivers Report Obtainable from: Water Research Commission PO Box 824 PRETORIA 0001 ISBN: 1 86845 689 7 Printed in the Republic of South Africa Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. r State of the Rivers Report Crocodile, Sahie-Stznd & Olifants River Systems A report of the River Health Programme http://www.csir.co.za/rhp/ WRC Report No, IT 147/01 March 2001 Participating Organisations ami Programmes Department ofWater Affairs and forestry Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Water Research Commission CSIR Etivironmentek Mpumatanga Parks Hoard Krtiger \ational Park Working for Water Programme (Atpitma/anga) Biomonitoring Serrices Steering Group Steve Mitchell Henk van Vliet Rudi Pretorius Alison I low man Joban de Beer Editorial Team Anna Balhince Liesl Hill Dirk Roux Mike Silherhauer Wilma Strydom Technical Contributions Andrew Deacon Gerhard Diedericks Joban Fngelbrecht Neels K/eynhaus Anton Linstrb'm Tony Poulter Francois Roux Christa Thirion Photographs Allan Batcl.wtor Andrew Deacon Anuelise (,'erher Neels Kleynhans Liesl Hill Johann Mey Dirk Roux loretta Steyn Wilma Strydom F.rnita van Wyk Design Loretta Steyn Graphic Design Studio Contents The Hirer Health Programme 7 A new Witter Act for South Africa 2 An Overview of the Study Area 4 River Indicators and Indices 6 Indices in this Report 8 The Crocodile River System Ecoregions and River Characteristics . 10 Present Ecological State 12 Drirers <>t Eco/miii/i/ Ch/un'i' 14 Desired Ecological State 16 The Sabie-Sand River System Ecoregions and River Characteristics .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of Flag Boshielo Dam, Olifants River, South Africa: Historical Trends and the Impact of Drought
    Water quality of Flag Boshielo Dam, Olifants River, South Africa: Historical trends and the impact of drought J Dabrowski1,2*, PJ Oberholster1,3 and JM Dabrowski2 1Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, P/Bag X04, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa 2CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, PO Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa 3CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, PO Box 320, Stellenbosch, 7599, South Africa ABSTRACT Increasing demands for water, discharge of effluents, and variable rainfall have a negative impact on water quality in the Olifants River. Crocodile and fish mortalities attributed to pansteatitis, in Loskop Dam and downstream in the Kruger National Park (KNP), have highlighted the serious effects these impacts are having on aquatic ecosystems. Flag Boshielo Dam is a reservoir on the Olifants River, located between Loskop Dam and the KNP. It has the largest crocodile population outside of the KNP, and pansteatitis has not been reported in fish or crocodiles to date. This study evaluated comparative water quality parameters concurrent to a similar study undertaken at Loskop Dam to establish possible environmental drivers of pansteatitis. Long-term monitoring data collected by the Department of Water Affairs were analysed for trends using a Seasonal-Kendall trend test. Short-term monitoring showed that water quality in Flag Boshielo Dam was of a good standard for ecosystem health. Concentrations of dissolved Cu, Se, V and Zn were always below instrument detection limits, and Al, Fe and Mn were mostly within guideline levels for ecosystem health. A severe drought occurred between November 2002 and December 2005.
    [Show full text]