Hyperatlas 3.0 Model Reports Annex to Deliverable 3 // December 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TOOLS & MAPS ACTIVITY // DRAFT HyperAtlas 3.0 Model Reports Annex to Deliverable 3 // December 2020 This Tools & Maps activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinions of members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Coordination Stephanie Kirchmayr-Novak Authors Stephanie Kirchmayr-Novak, Roland Gaugitsch, Joanne Tordy, Chien-Hui Hsiung, ÖIR GmbH (Austria), Sergio Muñoz Gómez, Rubén Navarro, Laurentia Technologies (Spain) Advisory group ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen Information on ESPON and its projects can be found at www.espon.eu. The website provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. © ESPON, 2020 Layout and graphic design by BGRAPHIC, Denmark Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] TOOLS & MAPS ACTIVITY // HyperAtlas 3.0 Model Reports Annex to Deliverable 3 // December 2020 Disclaimer This document is a draft report. The information contained herein is subject to change and does not commit the ESPON EGTC and the countries participating in the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The final version of the report will be published as soon as approved. TOOLS & MAPS ACTIVITY // HyperAtlas 3.0 Table of contents Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Preface: Intention of the Model report ............................................................................. 8 2 Storyline A – Regional authority....................................................................................... 9 2.1 Context ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Task description .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Use of HyperAtlas 3.0 ............................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Indicators useful for this task and availability of these indicators in the HyperAtlas3.0 ............. 10 2.3.2 Final settings in the HyperAtlas................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Interpretation of the results ....................................................................................................... 10 2.4.1 Share of forest area and population of working age in Europe ................................................. 10 2.5 Summary on findings ................................................................................................................ 13 2.6 Limitations of the HyperAtlas – additional analysis useful for answering the task ..................... 14 3 Storyline B ........................................................................................................................ 15 4 Storyline C – national player/macro-region ................................................................... 16 4.1 Context ..................................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Task description ........................................................................................................................ 16 4.3 Use of HyperAtlas 3.0 ............................................................................................................... 16 4.3.1 Indicators useful for this task and availability of these indicators in the HyperAtlas3.0 ............. 16 4.3.2 Final settings in the HyperAtlas................................................................................................. 17 4.3.3 Methods and maps of the HyperAtlas useful to solve this task ................................................. 17 4.4 Interpretation of the results ....................................................................................................... 18 4.4.1 Map: Ratio –Areas with population at risk of poverty and social exclusion ............................... 18 4.4.2 Map: Deviation to national average – Areas with population at risk of poverty and social exclusion ................................................................................................................................... 19 4.4.3 Map: Ratio – economic performance ........................................................................................ 20 4.4.4 Map: Deviation to macro-region’s average – economic performance ....................................... 21 4.4.5 Map: Deviation to national average – economic performance .................................................. 22 4.4.6 Map: Synthesis (deviation) – economic performance ............................................................... 23 4.4.7 Lorenz curve on economic performance ................................................................................... 24 4.5 Summary on findings – Answers to the research questions ..................................................... 24 4.6 Limitations of the HyperAtlas – additional analysis useful for answering the task ..................... 26 ESPON // espon.eu 5 TOOLS & MAPS ACTIVITY // HyperAtlas 3.0 List of figures List of figures Figure 2.1: Groundwater wetness percentile (June 2020) ............................................................................ 9 Figure 2.2: Regional scope and selected indicators.................................................................................... 10 Figure 2.3: Share of forest area on total area ............................................................................................. 11 Figure 2.4: Share of population of working age........................................................................................... 11 Figure 2.5: Deviation to EU 27+5, Share of forest area on total area ........................................................ 11 Figure 2.6: Deviation to EU27+5, Share of population of working age ........................................................ 11 Figure 2.7: Deviation to the national average, Share of forest area on total area ....................................... 12 Figure 2.8: Deviation to the national average, Share of population of working age .................................... 12 Figure 2.9: Deviation to the neighbouring regions, Share of forest area ..................................................... 12 Figure 2.10: Deviation to the neighbouring regions, Share of population of working age ........................... 12 Figure 2.11: Regions performing over average regarding all three spatial contexts (share of forest area) ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 2.12: Regions performing under average regarding all three spatial contexts (share of population of working age) ................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4.1: Regional scope and selected indicators.................................................................................... 17 Figure 4.2: Ratio – people at risk. (2014) .................................................................................................... 18 Figure 4.3: Ratio – People at risk (2017) .................................................................................................... 18 Figure 4.4: Deviation to the national average – people at risk (2014) ......................................................... 19 Figure 4.5: Deviation to national average – people at risk, zoom at AT (2014) ........................................... 19 Figure 4.6: Deviation to the national average – people at risk (2017) ......................................................... 19 Figure 4.7: Deviation to national average – people at risk, zoom at AT (2017) ........................................... 19 Figure 4.8: GDP/cap (PPS) (2010) ............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4.9: GDP/cap (PPS) (2017) ............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4.10: Deviation to the macro region’ average –GDP/cap (PPS) (2010) ........................................... 21 Figure 4.11: Deviation to the macro region’ average –GDP/cap (PPS), zoom at AT (2010) ....................... 21 Figure 4.12: Deviation to the macro region’ average –GDP/cap (PPS) (2017) ........................................... 21 Figure 4.13: Deviation to the macro region’ average –GDP/cap (PPS), zoom at AT (2017) ....................... 21 Figure 4.14: Deviation to the national average –GDP/cap (PPS) (2010) .................................................... 22 Figure 4.15: Deviation to national average –GDP/cap (PPS), zoom at AT (2010) .....................................