Supporting Document for Background Context And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Document for Background Context And NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED SUPPORTING DOCUMENT FOR BACKGROUND CONTEXT AND INFORMATION ONLY: Hinkley Point C Development Site Environmental Statement – Volume 2 (October 2011) Chapter 19 – Marine Ecology (Appendices to Chapter 19 can be found on the Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station page of the National Infrastructure Planning Website: infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/projects/south- west/Hinkley-point-c-new-nuclear-power-station) NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited Registered in England and Wales. Registered No. 6937084 Registered Office: 90 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4EZ Template No. NNB-308-REP-000723 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Development Hinkley Point C Consent Order Application Environmental Statement Doc Ref 4.3 October 2011 Environmental Statement - Volume 2 Hinkley Point C Development Site NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited Registered in England and Wales. Registered No. 6937084 Registered Office: 90 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4EZ Template No. NNB-308-REP-000723 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED CHAPTER 19: MARINE ECOLOGY NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED CONTENTS 19. MARINE ECOLOGY........................................................................................................7 19.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................7 19.2 Legislation and Policy....................................................................................................10 19.3 Methodology..................................................................................................................18 19.4 Baseline Environment....................................................................................................31 19.5 Scope of Assessment....................................................................................................71 19.6 Assessment of Impacts .................................................................................................75 19.7 Cumulative Assessment ..............................................................................................146 19.8 Management Controls and Mitigation Measures .........................................................148 19.9 Residual Impacts.........................................................................................................158 19.10 Proposed Monitoring Measures...................................................................................163 19.11 Summary of Impacts....................................................................................................168 19.12 Conclusions.................................................................................................................175 References...............................................................................................................................176 TABLES Table 19.1: Marine Ecology - Sources of Potential Interactions with Defined Project Activities for a Range of Key Receptors .................................................................................8 Table 19.2: Summary of Consultation Meetings Undertaken to Determine Scope and Nature of Marine Ecological Assessment and Survey Work .............................................10 Table 19.3: BEEMS Scientific Advisory Reports bearing on Methodology and Approach........20 Table 19.4: Feeder Reports Utilised in Preparing the Hinkley Point Marine Ecology Synthesis20 Table 19.5: Criteria used to Determine Sensitivity and Value for Marine Ecology....................25 Table 19.6: Criteria for Determining Magnitude for Effects on Marine Ecology........................26 Table 19.7: Total Estimated Areas (in km2) of Mean Annual Temperature Uplift due to Thermal Plumes from Different Power Station Intake/Outfall Configurations and Operational Regimes (from Ref. 19.59).................................................................28 Table 19.8: Estimated Areas (in km2) of Intertidal Habitat Impacted by Mean Annual Temperature Uplift Due to Thermal Plumes from Different Power Station Operational Regimes, Utilising Offshore Hinkley Point C Discharge Location (from Ref. 19.59).............................................................................................................30 Table 19.9: Key Features of the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel Relevant to the Marine Ecology of Hinkley Point (after Ref. 19.17)............................................................32 Table 19.10: Commonly Encountered Bird Species Recorded as Feeding in Bridgwater Bay, ordered by dominance (from Ref. 19.51)...............................................................46 Table 19.11: Potential Prey of Regularly Occurring Bird Species in the Bridgwater Bay Intertidal Area (table adapted from Ref. 19.114) ...................................................47 Volume 2 Hinkley Point C − Chapter 19 Marine Ecology | October 2011 1 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Table 19.12: Dietary Constituents of Birds Utilising Stert Flats during 2010 and early 2011, as Identified from Microscopic and Molecular Analyses of Bird Faeces (Ref. 19.54).50 Table 19.13: Migratory Movements of Diadromous Species found within the Severn Estuary, showing Important Months and Directions of Movement.......................................58 Table 19.14: Catch of Fish by 2m Beam Trawl (tows standardised to 1000m2) (Ref. 19.33) .....62 Table 19.15: Species Caught during the Intertidal Fish Survey..................................................63 Table 19.16: Average Annual (between 2004 and 2008) Weights (kg) and Values (£) of Fish Landings by ICES Statistical Rectangle ................................................................66 Table 19.17: Allowable and Utilised Effort for the Principal Salmon Net Fisheries in 2007 ........68 Table 19.18: Summary of Salmon Net Catches Numbers Landed, 1999-2006..........................68 Table 19.19: Provisional Net and Rod Salmon Catches (including released fish) by Region for the 2007 Season ...................................................................................................69 Table 19.20: The Number of Days of Porpoise Recordings at the BEEMS Acoustic Recording Stations around Hinkley Point (from Ref. 19.57) during Initial Survey Period of 77 Days ......................................................................................................................71 Table 19.21: Vessel Sound Frequencies and Source Levels.....................................................95 Table 19.22: Hearing Frequency Range for Fish Species of Conservation Importance in the Area around Hinkley Point (Ref. 19.164)...............................................................96 Table 19.23: Key Operational Impacts and Receptors.............................................................102 Table 19.24: Calculated Thermal Plume Areas at the Bed, for Particular Excess Temperatures104 Table 19.25: Incidence of Hourly Intervals of Occlusion of Estuarine Cross Sectional Area >25% from Annual Analysis (Ref.19.59)..............................................................107 Table 19.26: Predicted Total Annual Impingement (numbers of fish as, EAV, and total number of shrimp) of Key Species at HPC and HPB for Selected Species for an Abstraction Rate of 125m3.s-1 via HPB-type Intake Structures, Without Mitigation (Data from Ref. 19.43).........................................................................................121 Table 19.27: Equivalent Adult Value (EAV) of Predicted Annual Fish Impingement at Hinkley Point C Power Station at Maximum Cooling Water Demand of 125m3.s-1, Without Mitigation.............................................................................................................123 Table 19.28: Population Estimates of Lamprey (Mean ± s.d.) (Ref. 19.212)............................134 Table 19.29: Smallest Sizes of Various Fish Species Excluded by a 5mm Screen Mesh (Ref. 19.238) .......................................................................................................136 Table 19.30: Crangon Crangon: Annual Impingement and Entrainment Impact of HPC Options Compared with HPB............................................................................................141 Table 19.31: Survival rates of entrained fish and crustacean from EMU cooling water passage simulation experiments (Ref. 19.225)..................................................................142 Table 19.32: Presence (+) of Fish Eggs and Larvae Detected in Ichthyoplankton Surveys off Hinkley Point in 2008 and 2009...........................................................................143 Table 19.33: Predicted Entrainment of Fish Eggs and Larvae between February and June 2010 at Hinkley Point C (based on the Ref. 19.34) in relation to the abundance in the Trevose spawning area .................................................................................144 2 Volume 2 Hinkley Point C − Chapter 19 Marine Ecology | October 2011 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Table 19.34: Analysis of the HPB Impingement Catch showing % of Fish that would Remain Vulnerable to Capture with the Reduced Intake Velocities Modelled for the EA’s LVSE Design and the Proposed HPC Intake Design ..........................................154 Table 19.35: Assumed Proportional Effects of Intake System Mitigations (Mitigation Factors) 157 Table 19.36: Predicted
Recommended publications
  • Download a Copy
    Cover image: Courtesey of EDF Energy — www.edfenergy.com/energy CONTENTS... 1 AT A GLANCE... 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 4 BENEFITS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 5 WHAT THE PUBLIC THINK... 6 HOW NUCLEAR CREATES ENERGY... 7 HOW A REACTOR WORKS... 8 THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE... 9 MANAGING WASTE... 10 RADIATION EXPLAINED... 12 NUCLEAR AROUND THE WORLD... 14 UK NUCLEAR SITES... 16 NUCLEAR NEW BUILD... 17 NEW BUILD IN NUMBERS... 18 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE... 19 DECOMMISSIONING... 20 CAREERS IN NUCLEAR... 21 FUTHER INFORMATION... AT A GLANCE... Nuclear is a major part of our energy mix. Today it accounts for 21% of electricity generated in the UK and has been providing secure low carbon electricity for over 60 years. Low carbon energy, including There are 15 nuclear power and renewables, nuclear power account for almost 51% of the reactors operating UK’s generation electricity mix across eight sites in the UK In 2016 nuclear energy avoided 22.7 million metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in the UK BEIS,Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2018 That’s equivalent to taking around a third of all cars in the UK off the road Civil nuclear contributes over £6 billion to the jobs in the UK civil nuclear sector UK economy as much as aerospace manufacturing 12,159 Women in civil nuclear 1,981 People on apprenticeships Three quarters of the public 914 believe nuclear should be part People on graduate schemes of the clean energy mix Jobs Map figures generated from participating NIA members 1 This simple timeline charts some of the key people, events and legislation A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY..
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • Gbh Xmas Menu A4 06 1
    Hinkley Point News from EDF Energy July 2009 Site Nomination Update EDF Energy recently nominated to Government an area of land adjacent to the existing Hinkley Point nuclear power stations for the development of new nuclear power. The aerial plan shows the full extent of the land that has been nominated. Not all of this land will be required for the development of new nuclear power, and not all of it will necessarily be needed during the construction process. Nominated Land Area Detailed feasibility and design work is currently underway to determine the precise location of the power station and associated buildings. This work will also determine the exact boundaries of the land needed for the construction period. Land used temporarily during the construction process will be restored afterwards. EDF Energy has also nominated sites for Area of land nominated by EDF Energy for new nuclear build new nuclear build in Dungeness (Kent), Hartlepool (Teesside), Heysham Further details of our nomination of development can be obtained from (Lancashire) and Sizewell (Suffolk). land for new nuclear power www.nuclearpowersiting.decc.gov.uk . Next Steps After reviewing the nominations and received and the draft NPS will be EDF Energy is committed to consultation initial comments on new nuclear build, amended as appropriate and the list of and keeping local people informed at all the Government will produce a draft sites will be finalised. stages through the development Nuclear National Policy Statement process. (NPS), which will include a list of Once they have undertaken their own potential sites. There will be public public consultation, developers of sites For an outline timeline for future consultation on this in Autumn 2009 confirmed to be strategically suitable in consultation on the development of new and it will be scrutinised by Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Regarding Future of Hartlepool Power Station November 2017
    Position regarding future of Hartlepool Power Station November 2017 This position statement has been prepared based on information available on EDF Energy’s website, NuLeAF (Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum) website and information provided from officers within Hartlepool Borough Council. Background The nuclear power station in Hartlepool is managed by EDF Energy; it is capable of supplying energy to over 2 million homes in the UK. The power station started energy generation in 1983 and the estimated end of generation date is 2024. The current site employs approximately 530 people full time and a further 200 full time contract partners. Many of the nuclear power stations currently in operation across the UK are coming to the end of their operational lifespan and nuclear investment plan is underway. Whilst the current end of generation dates of these sites are not set in stone, there is probably little scope for any significant further extension of the operating lifetime of the power stations. EDF Energy is currently developing three new nuclear power stations (Hinkley Point C, Sizewell C and Bradwell B). More will be required in the future to replace aging power stations. Decommissioning In relation to decommissioning of the site, EDF gave the following overview of the three key phases at a recent NuLeAF meeting has drawn up decommissioning plans which divide into three phases: 1. Pre-closure transition and defueling (the defueling period is likely to take 3-4 years). 2. Site surveillance and Care & Maintenance 3. Reactor decommissioning and final site clearance. From start to finish this covers a period of approximately 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • STROUD and ELECTRICITY by Roger Hennessey
    Supplement to the Histelec News No. S67b December 2017 With the successful Weekend in the Cotswold organised by David Peacock, member Roger Hennessey sent his interesting electricity research of the area, for the benefit of members who joined the weekend away. It has been decided to give it further coverage. STROUD AND ELECTRICITY by Roger Hennessey The relationship between the Stroud area and electricity is a long one, summarised perhaps in the short phrase, 'From rear-guard to vanguard'. Although early developments seemed promising, Stroud took a long time to receive public supplies of electric power, even by the UK's notorious standards in the field. For example, the first English scientist to verify Benjamin Franklin's theory that lightning and electricity were the same was the Stroud-born John Canton, FRS (1718-72). In Victorian times one of the earliest enthusiasts for public electricity was a local textile magnate, Alfred Apperly, who installed electricity in his mansion (Rodborough Court) in the late 1880s. The story of electric power for the people of Stroud was, however, very different. Some of the district's many textile mills generated their own power, but repeated attempts to set up an undertaking for public supply ran into difficulties. As early as 1888 'A Ratepayer' was reported in the press suggesting the establishment of electricity undertaking for the town; soon afterwards the House-to-House Electric Supply Co supported the idea and applied for a Provisional Order [PO], but the initiative fizzled out. Another proposal in 1900 was opposed by the local Urban District Council which claimed that it was considering a PO itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Subtransmission South West 2018
    Strategic Investment Options Shaping Subtransmission South West – July 2018 Strategic Investment Options: Shaping Subtransmission Version Control Issue Date 1 26/07/2016 2 18/07/2018 Contact Details Email [email protected] Postal Network Strategy Team Western Power Distribution Feeder Road Bristol BS2 0TB Disclaimer Neither WPD, nor any person acting on its behalf, makes any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the use of any information, method or process disclosed in this document or that such use may not infringe the rights of any third party or assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damage resulting in any way from the use of, any information, apparatus, method or process disclosed in the document. © Western Power Distribution 2018 Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the Network Strategy and Innovation Manager, who can be contacted at the addresses given above. 2 South West – July 2018 Contents 1 – Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 – Objective of this Report ................................................................................................................ 7 3 – Background ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EDF ENERGY HOLDINGS LIMITED Registered Number 06930266
    EDF ENERGY HOLDINGS LIMITED Registered Number 06930266 ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER 2019 CONTENTS Page: 2 NigViZ\^X gZedgi 26 ?^gZXidghy gZedgi 28 ?^gZXidghy gZhedch^W^a^i^Zh hiViZbZci 29 DcYZeZcYZci <jY^idgyh gZedgi id i]Z HZbWZgh d[ @?A @cZg\n CdaY^c\h G^b^iZY 32 >dchda^YViZY ^cXdbZ hiViZbZci 33 >dchda^YViZY hiViZbZci d[ XdbegZ]Zch^kZ ^cXdbZ 34 >dchda^YViZY WVaVcXZ h]ZZi 36 >dchda^YViZY XVh] [adl hiViZbZci 37 >dchda^YViZY hiViZbZci d[ X]Vc\Zh ^c Zfj^in 38 IdiZh id i]Z Xdchda^YViZY [^cVcX^Va hiViZbZcih 109 >dbeVcn WVaVcXZ h]ZZi 110 >dbeVcn hiViZbZci d[ X]Vc\Zh ^c Zfj^in 111 IdiZh id i]Z >dbeVcn [^cVcX^Va hiViZbZcih Directors EZVc+=ZgcVgY Gqkn N^bdcZ Mdhh^ >da^c HVii]Zlh MdWZgi BjnaZg >]g^hide]Z >VgkVa K^ZggZ OdYdgdk SVk^Zg B^ggZ QZgdc^fjZ GVXdjg SVk^Zg PghVi >ZYg^X GZlVcYdlh`^ Nnak^Z EZ]Vccd Company Secretary Bj^Yd NVci^ &id 1/hi HVgX] 0./7'* EdZ Ndjid &[gdb /hi <eg^a 0./7' Auditor ?Zad^iiZ GGK C^aa CdjhZ / G^iiaZ IZl NigZZi GdcYdc Pc^iZY F^c\Ydb @>2< 1OM Registered Office 7. R]^i[^ZaY NigZZi GdcYdc @c\aVcY R/O 2@U / STRATEGIC REPORT Principal activities O]Z eg^cX^eVa VXi^k^i^Zh d[ @?A @cZg\n CdaY^c\h G^b^iZY &i]Z v>dbeVcnw' VcY hjWh^Y^Vg^Zh &id\Zi]Zg i]Z vBgdjew dg v@?A @cZg\nw'/ Yjg^c\ i]Z nZVg Xdci^cjZY id WZ i]Z egdk^h^dc VcY hjeean d[ ZaZXig^X^in VcY \Vh id XdbbZgX^Va* gZh^YZci^Va VcY ^cYjhig^Va XjhidbZgh* VcY i]Z \ZcZgVi^dc d[ ZaZXig^X^in i]gdj\] V edgi[da^d d[ \ZcZgVi^dc VhhZih ^cXajY^c\ cjXaZVg* XdVa* \Vh VcY gZcZlVWaZ \ZcZgVi^dc, O]Z Bgdje ^h Vahd ^ckdakZY ^c i]Z XdchigjXi^dc d[ cjXaZVg cZl Wj^aY VhhZih,
    [Show full text]
  • Onr Corporate Plan 2017/18 En Route to 2020
    ONR CORPORATE PLAN 2017/18 EN ROUTE TO 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Corporate Plan 2017/18 Financial year 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraphs 23 and 25(3) of Schedule 7 to the Energy Act 2013 July 2017 © ONR copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as ONR copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474145695 Web ISBN 9781474145701 ID P002881793 06/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK for Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office CONTENTS 1. Foreword .........................................................................................................1 2. About this plan ..............................................................................................3 3. Our Operating Environment .........................................................................9 4. Our Strategic Themes and Key Activities ....................................................15 Influencing improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Name Surname
    OFGEM FINANCIAL INFORMATION REPORTING YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2010 Under the Ofgem issued “Energy Supply Probe – Proposed Retail Market Remedies”, changes to generators and suppliers licences were made requiring licence holders to publish financial information to aid comparability of suppliers and generators. This “Segmental Reporting” satisfies Standard Licence Condition 19A of the Gas and Electricity Supply Licences and Standard Licence Condition 16B of the Electricity Generation Licence. EDF Energy (UK) Ltd and its subsidiaries (“EDF Energy”) operate through 3 operational business units supported by corporate services. These are “Energy Sourcing and Customer Supply”, ”Nuclear Generation”, “Nuclear New Build” and “Corporate Steering Functions and Company Shared Services & Integration”. The principal activities of these business units and support services are: Energy Sourcing and Customer Supply (ESCS): the provision and supply of electricity and gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers, the provision of services relating to energy, including purchasing of fuel for power generation and the generation of electricity; Nuclear Generation (NG): the generation of electricity through its fleet of nuclear power stations and Nuclear New Build (NNB): the development and construction of new nuclear power plants in the United Kingdom Corporate Steering Functions and Company Shared Services and Integration (CSF/CSSI): the provision of support services including HR, Finance, Property and IT, and the development of greater integration and synergies across the company where possible. The results of NNB are excluded from the scope of the Ofgem requirements hence NNB indirect and direct costs are not included in the analysis below. No consolidated statutory accounts have been prepared which include all UK operations of the EDF Energy group of companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nnb Generation Company Ltd
    NNB GENERATION COMPANY LTD COMPANY DOCUMENT HINKLEY POINT C MANAGEMENT PROSPECTUS © 2011 Published in the United Kingdom by NNB Generation Company Limited (NNB GenCo), 90 Whitfield Street - London, W1T 4EZ. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder NNB GenCo, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Requests for copies of this document should be referred to Head of Business Architecture, NNB Generation Company Limited (NNB GenCo), 90 Whitfield Street - London, W1T 4EZ. The electronic copy is the current issue and printing renders this document uncontrolled. Controlled copy-holders will continue to receive updates as usual. NNB GenCo – Company Document NNB-OSL-REP-000054 Management Prospectus THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 2 of 58 NNB GenCo – Company Document NNB-OSL-REP-000054 Management Prospectus THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 3 of 58 NNB GenCo – Company Document NNB-OSL-REP-000054 Management Prospectus MANAGING DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT This Management Prospectus for Hinkley Point C is written at a time of exciting developments in Nuclear Power in the UK. NNB Generation Company Limited was set up in 2009 to carry out the safe design, construction and operation of four EPR in the UK. While the EPR design is new to the UK, it is based on tried, tested and proven technology through over 30 years of safe and successful operation of similar designs in France.
    [Show full text]
  • A Powerhouse for the West July 2019
    Great Western Powerhouse March 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 3 Waterhouse Square Elliot House 138 Holborn 151 Deansgate London EC1N 2SW Manchester M3 3WD 020 3868 3085 0161 393 4364 Designed by Bristol City Council, Bristol Design July 19 BD11976 Great Western Powerhouse March 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 THE UK POLICY CONTEXT 8 DEVOLUTION AND THE EMERGING REGIONAL DIMENSION TO UK ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY 10 INTERNATIONAL MODELS OF CROSS-BORDER COLLABORATION 15 GREAT WESTERN POWERHOUSE GEOGRAPHY 18 ECONOMIC STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES 30 WHAT THE GREAT WESTERN POWERHOUSE SHOULD BE AIMING TO ACHIEVE 44 c 1 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 A Powerhouse for the West July 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The economic map of Britain is being reshaped by devolution and the • The Northern Powerhouse and the Midlands The economic geography emergence of regional powerhouses that can drive inclusive growth at scale, Engine have established themselves as formidable regional groupings driving economic The inner core of the region is the cross-border through regional collaboration But, there is a missing piece of the jigsaw in rebalancing and promoting trade and economic relationship between the two metro regions the West of Britain along the M4 from Swindon across the Welsh Border to investment through the internationalisation of of the West of England Region (including Bristol and Swansea, and the intersecting M5 axis, through Bristol, north to Tewkesbury their regions These powerhouses have been
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    DRAFT ISSUES REPORT A joint project by the Environment Agency and the Severn Estuary Strategy November 1996 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 103433 ASIANTAETH YR AMGTLCHEDD CYMRU E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y w a l e s GWASANAETH LLYFRGELL A GWYBODAETH CENEDLAETHOL NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE PR1F SWYDDFA/MAIN OFFICE Ty Cambria/Cambria House 29 Heol Casnew ydd/29 Newport Road Caerdydd/Cardiff CF24 OTP ENVIRONMENT a g e n c y WELSH REGION CATALOGUE ACCESSION CODE_AO_L: CLASS N O . ______________ M151 Lydney Newport^ n Caldicot Tusker jMonks Ditcl Rock T h o rn b u ry Porion Wjefsh Llantwit Grounds v Major Cardiff M id dle Denny Dinas„ Grounds Athan ^0*2. A von mouth Portishead Clevedo S cully Island Lanaford Grounds t i n # Holm Bristol Steep Hotm Weston-super-Mare KEY Minehead Boundary Built up area Burnham-on-Sea Major River Canal Motorway W illiton A Road Railway Sandbank Bridgwater Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1 2. Overview ........... .......................... ........................ ............................................. 7 3 Planning and management in the estuary. ..................................................... 25 4. Urban development, infrastructure & transport.................................................... 43 5. Agriculture and rural land use ............................................................................. 53 6. Coastal defence ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]