DOCSLIB.ORG

ENVIRONMENT B·O·P Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ENVIRONMENT B·O·P Bay of Plenty Regional Council ENVIRONMENT B·O·P Bay of Plenty Regional Council Bay of Plenty Regional Airports Requirements Final Report 17 December 2002 McGregor & Company PO Box 37 703 Parnell, Auckland, New Zealand Tel: +64-9-523 1998 Fax: +64-9-523 1999 Email: [email protected] Contents SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................................................I 1. BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 THE SITUATION ...........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 OBJECT OF THE STUDY...............................................................................................................................2 1.3 CONDUCT OF THE STUDY...........................................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Methodology......................................................................................................................................2 1.3.2 Study Team........................................................................................................................................3 1.3.3 Consultation......................................................................................................................................3 1.4 RISKS CONCEPTS.........................................................................................................................................4 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .....................................................................................................................5 2. THE AIR TRANSPORT SYSTEM .........................................................................................................6 2.1 IMPORTANCE OF AIR TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................6 2.2 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION......................................................................................7 2.3 POST YEAR 2001.........................................................................................................................................8 2.4 ANATOMY OF THE AIR TRANSPORT SYSTEM..........................................................................................8 2.5 ECONOMIC REGULATION.........................................................................................................................10 2.6 SAFETY REGULATION...............................................................................................................................12 2.7 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION .............................................................................................................13 2.8 BAY OF PLENTY AIR TRANSPORT...........................................................................................................13 2.8.1 Aircraft Movements....................................................................................................................... 13 2.8.2 Air Transport Passengers ............................................................................................................ 15 2.8.3 Air Cargo........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.9 ISSUES.........................................................................................................................................................17 2.10 CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................................................................18 3. AIRPORT OPERATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 MANAGEMENT OF AIRPORTS..................................................................................................................20 3.2 CORPORATE OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................................21 3.3 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE......................................................................................................................22 3.4 AIRPORT PLANNING..................................................................................................................................23 3.5 AN AERODROME OR AN AIRPORT...........................................................................................................24 3.6 CENTRAL NORTH ISLAND AIRPORTS.....................................................................................................26 3.7 ECONOMIC IMPACT ...................................................................................................................................27 3.7.1 Economic Impact of an Aerodrome ............................................................................................ 27 3.7.2 Regional Economic Impact.......................................................................................................... 28 3.8 AIRPORT CAPACITY..................................................................................................................................30 3.9 ISSUES.........................................................................................................................................................32 3.10 CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................................................................32 4. TAURANGA AIRPORT.......................................................................................................................... 33 4.1 AIRPORT OWNERSHIP ...............................................................................................................................33 4.2 AIRPORT LAND..........................................................................................................................................33 4.3 AIRPORT MANAGEMENT..........................................................................................................................33 4.4 CORPORATE OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................................34 4.5 CAPABILITY...............................................................................................................................................34 4.6 AERODROME RESTRICTIONS...................................................................................................................35 4.7 AIRPORT OPERATIONS.............................................................................................................................36 4.7.1 Air Transport.................................................................................................................................. 36 4.7.2 General Aviation............................................................................................................................ 38 4.8 AIRPORT CAPACITY..................................................................................................................................40 4.9 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE......................................................................................................................42 4.10 FUTURE AVIATION REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................43 4.10.1 High Growth Forecast................................................................................................................... 44 4.10.2 Medium Growth Forecast ............................................................................................................. 45 4.10.3 Low Growth Forecast .................................................................................................................... 47 4.11 DISTRICT LAND CAPACITY...............................................................................................................49 4.11.1 Residential........................................................................................................................................ 49 4.11.2 Business Land.................................................................................................................................. 50 4.12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................................................................51 4.13 ISSUES..................................................................................................................................................51 4.14 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................................54 5. ROTORUA AIRPORT............................................................................................................................. 55 5.1 AIRPORT OWNERSHIP ...............................................................................................................................55 5.2 AIRPORT LAND..........................................................................................................................................55 5.3 AIRPORT MANAGEMENT..........................................................................................................................55
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017
    AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017 ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 2 FOREWORD 3 PART A: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN GUIDE 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 IMPORTANCE OF AIRPORTS 7 3 PURPOSE OF AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING 9 4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 13 5 BASIC PLANNING PROCESS 15 6 REGULATORY AND POLICY CONTEXT 20 7 CRITICAL AIRPORT PLANNING PARAMETERS 27 8 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT 46 9 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN 50 10 CONCLUSION 56 PART B: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TEMPLATE 57 1 INTRODUCTION 58 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 59 C O N T E S 3 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 64 AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE New Zealand Airports Association | February 2017 ABOUT THE NZ AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION The New Zealand Airports Association (NZ Airports) is the national industry voice for airports in New Zealand. It is a not-for-profit organisation whose members operate 37 airports that span the country and enable the essential air transport links between each region of New Zealand and between New Zealand and the world. NZ Airports purpose is to: Facilitate co-operation, mutual assistance, information exchange and educational opportunities for Members Promote and advise Members on legislation, regulation and associated matters Provide timely information and analysis of all New Zealand and relevant international aviation developments and issues Provide a forum for discussion and decision on matters affecting the ownership and operation of airports and the aviation industry Disseminate advice in relation to the operation and maintenance of airport facilities Act as an advocate for airports and safe efficient aviation. Airport members1 range in size from a few thousand to 17 million passengers per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorological Society of New Zealand (Inc.)
    Meteorological Society of New Zealand Newsletter #143 Summer 2015/2016- Page 1 ISSN 0111-1736 Meteorological Society Of New Zealand (Inc.) NEWSLETTER 143 Summer 2015/2016 Meteorological Society of New Zealand Newsletter #143 Summer 2015/2016- Page 2 Meteorological Society Of New Zealand (Inc.) NEWSLETTER 143 SUMMER 2015/2016 PO Box 6523, Marion Square, Wellington 6141, New Zealand Please forward contributions to Bob McDavitt, [email protected] CONTENTS Page Presidential foreword 3 Conference 2015 4 AGM Minutes and reports 5-11 Spring: NIWA review 12-13 Notable events 13-20 Christchurch, Ben Tichborne 20 Pick of the clips 21-51 Your Committee President Daniel Kingston Immediate Past President Sam Dean Secretary Katrina Richards Treasurer Andrew Tait Circulation Manager Sylvia Nichol Auckland VP Nava Fedaeff Hamilton VP Tim Gunn Wellington VP James Renwick Christchurch VP Adrian MacDonald Dunedin VP Daniel Kingston Journal Editor Jennifer Salmond Newsletter Editor Bob McDavitt Website Liaison Stefanie Kremser General Committee Mike Revell Michael Martens Charles Pearson Views and endorsements expressed in this newsletter are those of the contributors and advertisers, and not necessarily those of the Meteorological Society of New Zealand. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the Society. Meteorological Society of New Zealand Newsletter #143 Summer 2015/2016- Page 3 WELCOME TO 2016 Kia ora koutou I would like to take this opportunity to wish you all a Happy New Year – I hope 2016 is successful and enjoyable for you all. From a meteorological and climatological perspective there is cer- tainly plenty of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders Made to Identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) Reduced Heights Necessary to Meet 1997 OLS By
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. A \ \~ 12009 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) and an application for enforcement orders under Section 316 of the Act BETWEEN ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED (ENV-2009-AKL-304) Applicant GEOFFREY WAYNE FISCHER Respondent Hearing: At Rotorua on 1ih, 18th September 2009 Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner PA Catchpole Enviromnent Commissioner CE Manning Appearances: Mr V Rive and Mr L U Hinchey for Rotorua Regional Airport Limited Mr G W Fischer for himself Date ofDecision: 9th November 2009 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Orders as sought refused. B: Orders made to identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) reduced heights necessary to meet 1997 OLS by: [a] identifying current RL of top of both trees; 2 [b] identifying RL for ground level and 1997 OLS level for both trees; [cl identifying height of trees to remain and to be removed to comply with 1997 OLS. C: The Airport Company or its authorized agents who have received a copy of this decision may enter the site to undertake survey, measurements, and mark the two trees with the 1997 OLS level. Such access is to occur at reasonable times on notice to the owner and tenant. D: If agreement cannot be reached within 1 week of each tree being marked the court will convene a teleconference to discuss final or further orders or directions. E: Leave and costs are reserved. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction [1] Rotorua Regional Airport Limited (the Airport Company) seeks enforcement orders against Mr G W Fischer, directing him to trim trees on his property at 628 Te Ngae Road, Rotorua.
    [Show full text]
  • Findings of the EPA National Investigation Into Firefighting Foams Containing PFOS
    Findings of the EPA national investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS 4 APRIL 2019 Contents Executive Summary 5 Background 9 PFOS: International and New Zealand regulation 11 Strategy for the investigation 12 Resources 12 Scope of our role 12 Identifying where to investigate 14 Definition of the ‘use’ of foam 15 Definition of compliance 15 Our compliance approach 16 Enforcement actions available to us 16 Carrying out the investigation 18 Collection of evidence 18 Sites where the PFOS in firefighting foam was discovered 18 Observations 19 Compliance and enforcement 21 Outcome 22 Next steps 24 Compliance and enforcement 24 Review of regulatory tools 24 On prosecution 25 Conclusions 25 Appendix 1 Public interest and communications 27 Appendix 2 Sites included in the investigation 29 3 Investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS | April 2019 4 Investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS | April 2019 Executive Summary In December 2017, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) began a national investigation into whether certain firefighting foams were present at airports and other locations in New Zealand. The foams under investigation contain a banned chemical, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS). This report describes the outcome of this initiative. PFOS foams were restricted in New Zealand in 2006 when they were excluded from the Firefighting Chemicals Group Standard1, meaning PFOS-containing foams could no longer be imported into New Zealand, or be manufactured here. In 2011, an international decision that had recognised PFOS as a persistent organic pollutant2 was written into New Zealand domestic law3. This meant, in addition to the 2006 restriction, any existing products containing PFOS could no longer be used in New Zealand, and strict controls were set to manage their storage and disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013
    Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013 Purpose A preliminary report to understand the level of risk the Port of Tauranga (POT) and Rotorua Airport present to the Bay of Plenty kiwifruit industry with the intent of determining if the current level of protection is adequate. Background Biosecurity in New Zealand consists of a multi –layer system that begins offshore with pre-border activities, incorporates the border and continues post-border into New Zealand where it becomes a joint effort between central government, regional councils, industry, community groups, and all New Zealanders, (a paper describing this system in more detail can be found on the KVH website www.kvh.org.nz/kiwifruit_biosecurity_risks). This paper will review a single layer, border interventions at ports of entry. Any port of entry has the potential to bring unwanted pests and diseases into New Zealand that could be detrimental to the kiwifruit industry, however, given the high concentration of the kiwifruit industry in the Bay of Plenty, this report has focused on the ports of entry in the immediate proximity to this region, which are the Port of Tauranga and the Rotorua Airport. The Port of Tauranga is New Zealand’s second largest port by container volume, and a major stop on the cruise ship circuit. Rotorua Airport is an International Airport receiving two trans-Tasman flights a week. Imports into POT, cruise ships, and passenger traffic through Rotorua Airport are all potential pathways for risk items to enter New Zealand and each will be reviewed to provide an overview of operations, potential risks that each present and how these risks are being mitigated.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette Climatological Table
    _, ...._____ "'- ·-~·~- -- ·., ·-· No. 35 rt::: 7; :-: : ~/·~:D I 801 j' .;.,·1 ..C J t,;~: ';,,,,.·}'\. f:. r, r107,.}V,,.,.) 1' i t i I SUPPLEMENT TO 'IHE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, 17 MARCH 1983 Published by Authority WELLINGTON: MONDAY, 21 MARCH 1983 CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE FOR JANUARY 1983 802 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 35 NEW ZEALAND MEIBOROLOGICAL SERVICE CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE-Summary of the Records of Temperature, Rainfall, and Sunshine for January 1983 Air Temperature in Degrees Celsius Rainfall in Millimetres He,tt Means of Absolute Maximum and Maximum Bright Station Station Mean Differ- Minimum No. Differ- Fall Sun- Above of A ence Total of encc shine M.S.L. and From Fall Rain From B Normal Date Date Days Normal Amount Date J!n. mum I ~-. I . --,. l=I. Metres C C C .C C C mm mm mm Hrs CapeReinga 191 21.6 14.7 18.2 +0.0 25.4 11 12.9 1 45 9 -16 21 19 Kaitaia Airport 80 22.9 13.5 18.2 -1.0 26.1 12 10.5 28 36 15 -43 11 12 274 Aupouri Forest 69 22.5 15.0 18.8 -0.6 26.5 12 10.6 1 32 9 -29 9 12 Kaitaia 8 23.2 12.2 17.7 26.0 12 8.7 27 30 7 12 12 Kerikeri M A F 79 24.6 12.2 18.4 30.2 11 9.6 2 18 9 9 12 Kerikeri Downs 79 24.8 12.6 18.7 30.2 11 10.4 3 20 7 9 12 Kerikeri Aerodrome 150 24.6 12.0 18.3 31.2 11 9.6 2 14 4 13 12 Umawera 9 .
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Productivity Commission on the Draft Report on Better Urban Planning
    SUBMISSION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION ON THE DRAFT REPORT ON BETTER URBAN PLANNING 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The New Zealand Airports Association ("NZ Airports") welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Productivity Commission's Draft Report on Better Urban Planning ("Draft Report"). 1.2 NZ Airports has submitted on the Resource Legislation Amendment Bill ("RLAB") and presented to the Select Committee on the RLAB, and has also submitted on the Proposed National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity ("NPS-UDC"). Our members have also been closely involved in extensive plan review processes in Auckland and Christchurch. Such participation is costly and time consuming - but necessary, given the important role the planning framework plays in our operations. 1.3 As discussed in our previous submissions, it is fundamental to the development of productive urban centres that residential and business growth does not hinder the effective current or future operation of New Zealand's airports. 1.4 In our view, the Draft Report does not adequately acknowledge the importance of significant infrastructure like airports in the context of urban planning and the need to effectively manage reverse sensitivity effects on such infrastructure. This is reflected in some of the Commission's recommendations which seek to limit notification and appeal rights and introduce the ability to amend zoning without using the Schedule 1 process in the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA"). NZ Airports has major concerns with such recommendations as they stand to significantly curtail the ability of infrastructure providers to be involved in planning processes and have their key concerns, such as reverse sensitivity effects, taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order 7340.2A Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.2A CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2A, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. July 29, 2010. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Changes, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. Y[fa\.Uj-Koef p^/2, Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: k/^///V/<+///0 Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 7/29/10 JO 7340.2A CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 4/8/10 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 7/29/10 1−1−1 . 8/27/09 1−1−1 . 7/29/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 4/8/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 7/29/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−23 .
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: New Zealand
    Case Study: New Zealand Background Because of its geographic location, its dependence on tourism, and the absence of a comprehensive rail network, New Zealand has developed a large international and national airports network over the years. Until 1966, almost all New Zealand important airports were developed by the State and remained under the central Government ownership and management. There are three main international airports. First, Auckland Airport is the busiest and the main international airport. It is the only airport serving the Auckland metropolitan area, which gathers a third of the country’s total population. Second, Wellington International Airport is also a major domestic hub serving mainly business and government. International flights at Wellington Airport are principally from/to Australia. Third, Christchurch International Airport is the major international airport in the South Island, where it acts as the main hub and attracts a significant share of New Zealand’s international tourist traffic. There are other international airports in New Zealand, such as Dunedin, Hamilton, Queenstown, and Palmerston North, which also get flights from other countries (mainly Australia). Other commercial airports serve domestic and regional traffic. Commercialization/privatization: Airports The commercialization of New Zealand’s airports started early. First, the 1961 Joint Airport Scheme established the principles that resulted in both central and local governments jointly owning and operating airport facilities. The objective of this policy was both to benefit from the expertise of local governments on regional economic needs and opportunities, and to make local government directly invest in airport infrastructure. In 1974, 24 airports throughout New Zealand were under a joint venture ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Brand Toolkit
    New Zealand New / 2019 The stories of VERSION 3.0 VERSION Regional Brand Toolkit VERSION 3.0 / 2019 Regional Brand Toolkit The stories of New Zealand Welcome to the third edition of the Regional Brand Toolkit At Air New Zealand I’m pleased to share with you the revised version our core purpose of the Regional Brand Toolkit featuring a number of updates to regions which have undergone a is to supercharge brand refresh, or which have made substantial New Zealand’s success changes to their brand proposition, positioning or right across our great direction over the last year. country – socially, environmentally and We play a key role in stimulating visitor demand, growing visitation to New Zealand year-round economically. This is and encouraging visitors to travel throughout the about making a positive country. It’s therefore important we communicate AIR NEW ZEALAND impact, creating each region’s brand consistently across all our sustainable growth communications channels. and contributing This toolkit has proven to be a valuable tool for to the success of – Air New Zealand’s marketing teams, providing TOOLKIT BRAND REGIONAL New Zealand’s goals. inspiring content and imagery which we use to highlight all the regions which make our beautiful country exceptional. We’re committed to showcasing the diversity of our regions and helping to share each region’s unique story. And we believe we’re well placed to do this through our international schedule timed to connect visitors onto our network of 20 domestic destinations. Thank you to the Regional Tourism Organisations for the content you have provided and for the ongoing work you’re doing to develop strong and distinctive brands for your regions.
    [Show full text]
  • British Aerospace Bae J31 Jetstream Sorting: Serial Nr
    British Aerospace BAe J31 Jetstream Sorting: Serial Nr. 29.08.2021 Ser.Nr. Type F/F Status Immatr. Operator Last Operator in service Engines Owner Rem. @airlinefleet.info M/Y until 601 BAe.J3102 1982 broken up G-WMCC none Maersk Air UK 08-1996 GA TPE331-10 Air Commuter ntu 602 BAe.J3101 1982 broken up N422MX none Eastern Metro Express 01-1998 GA TPE331-10 Mall Airways ntu 603 BAe.J3103 1982 broken up N603JS none Gold Aviation 01-2001 GA TPE331-10 broken up by 08-2005 604 BAe.J3101 1982 perm_wfu N78019 none Personal Airliner 05-2011 GA TPE331-10 to be broken up 605 BAe.J3102 1982 in service N408PP Corporate 06-2013 GA TPE331-10 Phil Pate 606 BAe.J3102 1982 perm_wfu LN-FAV none Coast Air 02-2007 GA TPE331-10 Royal Norwegian Air Force as instr. airframe 607 BAe.J3102 1983 perm_wfu N607BA none Professional Aviation Group 04-2008 GA TPE331-10 to be broken up 608 BAe.J3101 1983 broken up N608JX none Native American Air Serv. 03-1999 GA TPE331-10 broken up 03-2005 609 BAe.J3102 1983 broken up N609BA none Professional Aviation Group 05-2013 GA TPE331-10 610 BAe.J3103 1983 broken up G-JXTA none Jetstream Executive Travel 02-2011 GA TPE331-10 broken up 2016 611 BAe.J3101 1983 broken up N419MX none Eastern Metro Express 01-1991 GA TPE331-10 broken up 12-1997 612 BAe.J3102 1983 stored OM-NKD none SK Air 00-1999 GA TPE331-10 613 BAe.J3101 1983 in service N904EH Corporate 02-2019 GA TPE331-10 Aerostar 1 Inc.
    [Show full text]