DOCSLIB.ORG

Auckland Airport's Long Term Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Auckland International Airport Limited Topic 045: Airport Submitter number: 5294 Primary evidence IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF GREGORY JOHN OSBORNE FOR AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN RELATION TO TOPIC 045 AIRPORT (PLANNING) 26 MARCH 2014 A A Arthur-Young / S J Glenn Phone +64 9 367 8000 Fax +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 8 DX CX10085 Auckland i Auckland International Airport Limited Topic 045: Airport Submitter number: 5294 Primary evidence CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 1 1. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .................................................... 4 2. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE ............................................................................ 5 3. OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED UNITARY PLAN CHANGES ...................... 6 Auckland Airport's Long Term Planning ............................................. 6 Implementation through the Unitary Plan ........................................... 7 Proposed Unitary Plan Framework .................................................... 9 Regional Policy Statement .............................................................. 10 4. AIRPORT ZONE AND AIRPORT APPROACH PATH OVERLAY ........... 11 5. AUCKLAND AIRPORT PRECINCT ........................................................ 12 Outstanding matters ........................................................................ 13 6. AUCKLAND AIRPORT'S DESIGNATIONS ............................................. 17 Designation 1100 ............................................................................ 18 7. AIRCRAFT NOISE OVERLAY ................................................................ 20 Reverse Sensitivity Effects .............................................................. 20 NZS 6805:1992 ............................................................................... 21 The Aircraft Noise Overlay in the Unitary Plan ................................. 23 MANA .............................................................................................. 23 HANA .............................................................................................. 24 Changes to Aircraft Noise Areas in AIAL Submission ...................... 27 HANA .............................................................................................. 27 MANA .............................................................................................. 27 Section 32 Assessment Of Aircraft Noise Overlay Provisions .......... 29 8. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 31 ANNEXURE 1 ............................................................................................... 33 ANNEXURE 2 ............................................................................................... 34 ANNEXURE 3 ............................................................................................... 35 ANNEXURE 4 ............................................................................................... 36 ANNEXURE 5 ............................................................................................... 37 ANNEXURE 6 ............................................................................................... 38 ANNEXURE 7 ............................................................................................... 39 ANNEXURE 8 ............................................................................................... 40 ANNEXURE 9 ............................................................................................... 41 ANNEXURE 10 ............................................................................................. 42 ANNEXURE 11 ............................................................................................. 43 2801108 1 Auckland International Airport Limited Topic 045: Airport Submitter number: 5294 Primary evidence EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. The relevant planning framework in the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Unitary Plan") governing Auckland International Airport Limited ("AIAL") is comprised of the underlying Airport zone, Auckland Airport Precinct, the Aircraft Noise Overlay, and AIAL's designations. The relevant provisions have mostly been agreed with Auckland Council and most other submitters prior to and during mediation, and I support the provisions as attached to my evidence. B. The consistent key themes of the Unitary Plan Regional Policy Statement ("RPS") objectives and policies in the context of Auckland Airport are: (a) The need to recognise and enable the economic and social wellbeing benefits of Auckland Airport and its related business functions that connect New Zealand (as an exporting nation and a tourist destination) with the world and Auckland (as the Gateway to New Zealand) with the rest of New Zealand; (b) The need to make provision for the future growth of the Airport as well as its existing capacity by protecting existing and planned future infrastructure from reverse sensitivity effects; and (c) The need to manage land use surrounding the airport and the aircraft operations of the airport to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects of aircraft noise on the amenity of people and communities. In my view, the versions of the objectives, policies and rules of the Auckland Airport Precinct and the Aircraft Noise Overlay which are appended to my evidence give effect to these proposed RPS objectives and policies. 2801108 2 Auckland International Airport Limited Topic 045: Airport Submitter number: 5294 Primary evidence C. AIAL has recently undertaken its latest master-planning exercise, which sets the direction for growth and development of the Airport over the next 30 years. That was a comprehensive process involving a number of internationally recognised consultants. The primary outcome from that exercise is the need to increase the operational length of the proposed northern runway to meet the predicted needs of passengers and freight. D. In order to reflect predicted future levels of aircraft noise from aircraft operations using the northern runway, AIAL sought to expand the aircraft noise areas for land use planning purposes through its submission on Unitary Plan. E. In the usual case, the changes sought to the aircraft noise areas would be undertaken at the same time as any necessary alterations to the conditions attaching to the designations are made. However, in 2013, when the Council required AIAL to provide notice of any modifications to its designations, AIAL had not yet completed the requisite modelling to make those changes to its designation. F. After the Unitary Plan was notified and before primary submissions closed, the necessary aircraft noise modelling and other work had been completed, which enabled AIAL to lodge its submission seeking changes to the aircraft noise areas. In my view, it would have been irresponsible for AIAL to remain silent on the implications of its comprehensive master-planning exercise through the Unitary Plan when major decisions on future urban growth are being made. G. Analysis of the residential areas affected by the changes has confirmed that they are relatively small and only a small number of residential properties have development potential beyond the density controls proposed within the Aircraft Noise Overlay provisions. H. In relation to the objectives, policies and rules relating to the Auckland Airport Precinct, I consider that there are some amendments required to enable the continued growth and development of Auckland Airport by recognising the need for some "bespoke" objectives, policies and rules relating to natural resources and specific parking requirements. 2801108 3 Auckland International Airport Limited Topic 045: Airport Submitter number: 5294 Primary evidence The detailed reasons for these amendments are explained in the evidence of Mr Seyb, Mr McKenzie and Mr Collier. I. I support the amendment to Objective 6 of the Auckland Airport Precinct Objectives and policies to introduce reference to spiritual as well as cultural values and the amendment to Policy 15 highlighting the need for development within the Mangere Gateway sub-precinct to recognise and provide for the relationship of mana whenua with their ancestral lands, water, sites, and waahi tapu and other Taonga. J. I also consider that provision should be made in the Auckland Airport Precinct rules for development control infringements rather than relying on the generic provisions in Rule G2.3. In addition, there are some further minor amendments required to the Auckland Airport Precinct rules to correct minor anomalies I have identified in the mediation record, as detailed in my evidence. K. I support the agreed amendments to the Designations as recorded in the mediation record including those to address the concerns expressed in the Te Ākitai Waiohua Waka Taua Trust's submissions and in pre-mediation meetings with regard to Designation 1100. I also support the refinements sought by Te Ākitai post-mediation regarding their request for two mana whenua representatives on the Aircraft Noise Community Consultative Group. These amendments and refinements are included in the version of Designation 1100 attached as Annexure 7. L In my opinion, amendments are required to the Unitary Plan provisions in order to ensure Auckland Airport is able to continue supporting the social
Recommended publications
  • AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017

    AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017

    AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017 ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 2 FOREWORD 3 PART A: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN GUIDE 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 IMPORTANCE OF AIRPORTS 7 3 PURPOSE OF AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING 9 4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 13 5 BASIC PLANNING PROCESS 15 6 REGULATORY AND POLICY CONTEXT 20 7 CRITICAL AIRPORT PLANNING PARAMETERS 27 8 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT 46 9 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN 50 10 CONCLUSION 56 PART B: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TEMPLATE 57 1 INTRODUCTION 58 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 59 C O N T E S 3 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 64 AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE New Zealand Airports Association | February 2017 ABOUT THE NZ AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION The New Zealand Airports Association (NZ Airports) is the national industry voice for airports in New Zealand. It is a not-for-profit organisation whose members operate 37 airports that span the country and enable the essential air transport links between each region of New Zealand and between New Zealand and the world. NZ Airports purpose is to: Facilitate co-operation, mutual assistance, information exchange and educational opportunities for Members Promote and advise Members on legislation, regulation and associated matters Provide timely information and analysis of all New Zealand and relevant international aviation developments and issues Provide a forum for discussion and decision on matters affecting the ownership and operation of airports and the aviation industry Disseminate advice in relation to the operation and maintenance of airport facilities Act as an advocate for airports and safe efficient aviation. Airport members1 range in size from a few thousand to 17 million passengers per year.
  • Legal Submissions for Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (Further Submitter 31054) Dated: 6 August 2020

    Legal Submissions for Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (Further Submitter 31054) Dated: 6 August 2020

    Before the Queenstown Lakes District Council In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan Hearing Stream 18 (Rural Visitor Zone) Legal Submissions for Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (Further Submitter 31054) Dated: 6 August 2020 Counsel | Rebecca Wolt | Barrister Email | [email protected] Phone | +64 21 244 2950 1 Introduction 1. These legal submissions are filed on behalf of Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (QAC) in respect of its further submission on the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan (PDP) addressing an original submission (OS31021) by Corbridge Estates Limited Partnership (Corbridge) to rezone approximately 322 ha of land located at 707 Wanaka-Luggate Highway Limited from Rural Zone to Rural Visitor Zone (RVA). 2. The Corbridge land is proximate to Wanaka Airport (Airport), under the Airport’s main flight path, and partly within the Airport’s Operative Outer Control Boundary (OCB). 3. QAC is responsible for the management and planning of Wanaka Airport pursuant to a long-term lease by Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC). 4. QAC opposes the Corbridge submission for reverse sensitivity and amenity reasons and seeks retention of the land’s Rural zoning. Legal Framework 5. Ms Scott for QLDC has addressed the statutory framework within which decisions on submissions and further submissions must be made.1 Ms Scott’s submissions are generally accepted as correct and adopted here. 6. The issue of jurisdictional scope arises for the Corbridge submission, and Ms Scott’s submissions on that2 will be addressed and elaborated upon shortly. QAC 7. QAC was incorporated in 1988 and is responsible for operating Queenstown Airport.
  • Orders Made to Identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) Reduced Heights Necessary to Meet 1997 OLS By

    Orders Made to Identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) Reduced Heights Necessary to Meet 1997 OLS By

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. A \ \~ 12009 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) and an application for enforcement orders under Section 316 of the Act BETWEEN ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED (ENV-2009-AKL-304) Applicant GEOFFREY WAYNE FISCHER Respondent Hearing: At Rotorua on 1ih, 18th September 2009 Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner PA Catchpole Enviromnent Commissioner CE Manning Appearances: Mr V Rive and Mr L U Hinchey for Rotorua Regional Airport Limited Mr G W Fischer for himself Date ofDecision: 9th November 2009 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Orders as sought refused. B: Orders made to identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) reduced heights necessary to meet 1997 OLS by: [a] identifying current RL of top of both trees; 2 [b] identifying RL for ground level and 1997 OLS level for both trees; [cl identifying height of trees to remain and to be removed to comply with 1997 OLS. C: The Airport Company or its authorized agents who have received a copy of this decision may enter the site to undertake survey, measurements, and mark the two trees with the 1997 OLS level. Such access is to occur at reasonable times on notice to the owner and tenant. D: If agreement cannot be reached within 1 week of each tree being marked the court will convene a teleconference to discuss final or further orders or directions. E: Leave and costs are reserved. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction [1] Rotorua Regional Airport Limited (the Airport Company) seeks enforcement orders against Mr G W Fischer, directing him to trim trees on his property at 628 Te Ngae Road, Rotorua.
  • Jetstar Brings More Visitors to Queenstown for Christmas

    Jetstar Brings More Visitors to Queenstown for Christmas

    Dec 23, 2011 16:46 +08 Jetstar Brings More Visitors to Queenstown for Christmas Crew of the first Jetstar flight on the Wellington to Queenstown route celebrate. • First flights from Wellington and Sydney to Queenstown almost sold-out • Growing New Zealand tourism through competition and low fares • Jetstar’s on time performance for Queenstown 88 per cent Hundreds of friends, family members and holidaymakers arrived in Queenstown today on Jetstar’s inaugural flights from Wellington and Sydney, just in time for Christmas and New Year. All but a handful of the 180 seats on flight JQ293 from Wellington were filled, with the A320 aircraft touching down in Queenstown mid-morning. Meanwhile, more than 170 passengers winged their way across the Tasman from Sydney on flight JQ223 to arrive in Queenstown mid-afternoon. Jetstar Australia & NZ CEO, David Hall, joined Queenstown Airport CEO, Steve Sanderson, and Destination Queenstown CEO, Tony Everitt, in welcoming passengers. “We’re pleased to be bringing friends and families together for Christmas, and more visitors to Queenstown,” Mr Hall said. “In addition to our new Sydney and Wellington flights, we’ve introduced an extra weekly Melbourne service and two extra weekly flights to Auckland. “In total, these services have the potential to bring an additional 180,000 additional travellers into the region each year,” said Mr Hall said. “Our low fares, which are at least 30 per cent lower than our competitor’s, mean travellers have more money to spend once they arrive.” Mr Sanderson said: “Today’s inaugural flights represent another significant inbound tourism injection for Queenstown.
  • Marginfuel Market Monitor

    Marginfuel Market Monitor

    New Zealand Rental Vehicle Market Insights Report December 2018 2nd Edition Issued 24th January 2019 www.marginfuel.com INTRODUCTION We are pleased to present MarginFuel’s 2nd edition of the “New Zealand Rental Vehicle Market Insights Report”. The report summarises the Average Market Rate# (average rate) of the New Zealand Rental Car Market, with a focus on the most popular Vehicle Categories^ from New Zealand’s three major airports*, being Auckland, Christchurch and Queenstown Airports. The report is split into three sections. • Section 1 - December 2018 Analysis; overall the average rate increased Year on Year (YoY), with Direct Sales channels showing the largest increase. • Section 2 - Year to Date (YTD) Analysis from September to December 2018; as is the typical seasonal trend, the average rate bottomed out in September 2018, and began to climb into the high season. Average rates in December 2018, for all three locations, were up +11% to +22% YoY. • Section 3 - Forward Market Analysis from January to April 2019; average rates are trending upwards YoY from February to April 2019, however, there is still a flat spot in demand in late January 2019 (compared to late January 2018). Please do not hesitate to get in contact to discuss the Report, or your pricing requirements. Thanks, The MarginFuel Team Notes: ^ Underlying car type (make & model) data was mapped to commonly used car categories, being SUV, Intermediate, Compact and Economy, using the internationally recognised SIPP code mapping table * All three (3) airport locations include
  • Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Annual Report for Financial Year Ended 30 June 2020

    Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Annual Report for Financial Year Ended 30 June 2020

    Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Annual Report for Financial Year Ended 30 June 2020 Contents Directory ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Annual Report ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Income Statement ................................................................................................................................ 13 Statement of Comprehensive Income ..................................................................................................... 14 Statement of Financial Position .............................................................................................................. 15 Statement of Changes in Equity ............................................................................................................. 16 Cash Flow Statement ............................................................................................................................. 17 Notes to the Financial Statements .......................................................................................................... 18 Statement of Service Performance ......................................................................................................... 44 Independent Auditor’s Report ...............................................................................................................
  • Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013

    Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013

    Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013 Purpose A preliminary report to understand the level of risk the Port of Tauranga (POT) and Rotorua Airport present to the Bay of Plenty kiwifruit industry with the intent of determining if the current level of protection is adequate. Background Biosecurity in New Zealand consists of a multi –layer system that begins offshore with pre-border activities, incorporates the border and continues post-border into New Zealand where it becomes a joint effort between central government, regional councils, industry, community groups, and all New Zealanders, (a paper describing this system in more detail can be found on the KVH website www.kvh.org.nz/kiwifruit_biosecurity_risks). This paper will review a single layer, border interventions at ports of entry. Any port of entry has the potential to bring unwanted pests and diseases into New Zealand that could be detrimental to the kiwifruit industry, however, given the high concentration of the kiwifruit industry in the Bay of Plenty, this report has focused on the ports of entry in the immediate proximity to this region, which are the Port of Tauranga and the Rotorua Airport. The Port of Tauranga is New Zealand’s second largest port by container volume, and a major stop on the cruise ship circuit. Rotorua Airport is an International Airport receiving two trans-Tasman flights a week. Imports into POT, cruise ships, and passenger traffic through Rotorua Airport are all potential pathways for risk items to enter New Zealand and each will be reviewed to provide an overview of operations, potential risks that each present and how these risks are being mitigated.
  • Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited

    Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited

    Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Interim Report for the Six Month Period Ended 31 December 2019 Contents Chair and Chief Executive’s Report ............................................................................................. 2 Directors’ Responsibility Statement ............................................................................................ 5 Income Statement .................................................................................................................... 6 Statement of Comprehensive Income ......................................................................................... 7 Statement of Changes in Equity ................................................................................................. 8 Statement of Financial Position .................................................................................................. 9 Cash Flow Statement .............................................................................................................. 10 Notes to the Financial Statements ............................................................................................ 11 QUEENSTOWN AIRPORT CORPORATION LIMITED | 1 Chair and Chief Executive’s Report We are pleased to present Queenstown Airport Corporation’s (QAC) interim report for the six-month period to 31 December 2019. Over the period we have made solid progress in key areas of focus, including terminal upgrades, new customer product offerings, technology enhancements, sustainability and business resilience.
  • Case Study: New Zealand

    Case Study: New Zealand

    Case Study: New Zealand Background Because of its geographic location, its dependence on tourism, and the absence of a comprehensive rail network, New Zealand has developed a large international and national airports network over the years. Until 1966, almost all New Zealand important airports were developed by the State and remained under the central Government ownership and management. There are three main international airports. First, Auckland Airport is the busiest and the main international airport. It is the only airport serving the Auckland metropolitan area, which gathers a third of the country’s total population. Second, Wellington International Airport is also a major domestic hub serving mainly business and government. International flights at Wellington Airport are principally from/to Australia. Third, Christchurch International Airport is the major international airport in the South Island, where it acts as the main hub and attracts a significant share of New Zealand’s international tourist traffic. There are other international airports in New Zealand, such as Dunedin, Hamilton, Queenstown, and Palmerston North, which also get flights from other countries (mainly Australia). Other commercial airports serve domestic and regional traffic. Commercialization/privatization: Airports The commercialization of New Zealand’s airports started early. First, the 1961 Joint Airport Scheme established the principles that resulted in both central and local governments jointly owning and operating airport facilities. The objective of this policy was both to benefit from the expertise of local governments on regional economic needs and opportunities, and to make local government directly invest in airport infrastructure. In 1974, 24 airports throughout New Zealand were under a joint venture ownership.
  • Regional Brand Toolkit

    Regional Brand Toolkit

    New Zealand New / 2019 The stories of VERSION 3.0 VERSION Regional Brand Toolkit VERSION 3.0 / 2019 Regional Brand Toolkit The stories of New Zealand Welcome to the third edition of the Regional Brand Toolkit At Air New Zealand I’m pleased to share with you the revised version our core purpose of the Regional Brand Toolkit featuring a number of updates to regions which have undergone a is to supercharge brand refresh, or which have made substantial New Zealand’s success changes to their brand proposition, positioning or right across our great direction over the last year. country – socially, environmentally and We play a key role in stimulating visitor demand, growing visitation to New Zealand year-round economically. This is and encouraging visitors to travel throughout the about making a positive country. It’s therefore important we communicate AIR NEW ZEALAND impact, creating each region’s brand consistently across all our sustainable growth communications channels. and contributing This toolkit has proven to be a valuable tool for to the success of – Air New Zealand’s marketing teams, providing TOOLKIT BRAND REGIONAL New Zealand’s goals. inspiring content and imagery which we use to highlight all the regions which make our beautiful country exceptional. We’re committed to showcasing the diversity of our regions and helping to share each region’s unique story. And we believe we’re well placed to do this through our international schedule timed to connect visitors onto our network of 20 domestic destinations. Thank you to the Regional Tourism Organisations for the content you have provided and for the ongoing work you’re doing to develop strong and distinctive brands for your regions.
  • TERRACE AIRSIDE AIRPORT + COVID-19 So Much More Than Just Your Read About How Rotorua Airport Average Airport Café-Style Turned a Difficult Situation Into Some- Food

    TERRACE AIRSIDE AIRPORT + COVID-19 So Much More Than Just Your Read About How Rotorua Airport Average Airport Café-Style Turned a Difficult Situation Into Some- Food

    R OTORUA AIRPORT LIMITED NEWSLETTER I SPRING 2020 | ISSUE 02 TERRACE AIRSIDE AIRPORT + COVID-19 So much more than just your Read about how Rotorua Airport average airport café-style turned a difficult situation into some- food. Be WOW’d by Terrace thing pretty special as an essential Airside’s offerings. service for the BOP Community. HAERE MAI | ROTORUA AIRPORT | SPRING 2020 | PAGE 1 During a strategy meeting in July we took a short break to head to Mokoia Island to learn about its history and cultural significance. Quick ride out to Mokoia Leaning about the history and significance of Mokoia Mokoia thermal pools Rotorua Airport team with guide Jason Tamaki Keep up-to-date with what’s happening at Rotorua Airport... [email protected] www.facebook.com/RotoruaAirport/ Phone 07 345 8800 State Highway 30, Rotorua, New Zealand www.linkedin.com/company/rotorua-airport Open Hours 5.30am - 9.15pm. Seven days a week HAERE MAI | ROTORUA AIRPORT | SPRING 2020 | PAGE 2 Kia ora and welcome to the second edition of our airport newsletter, Haere Mai. MARK GIBB, CHIEF EXECUTIVE We launched our first newsletter earlier this year and have received really positive feedback from our community. We very much hope you enjoy Issue 02 of Haere Mai. 2020 has been a very challenging year for all of us. Back in February we were looking towards a record 12 months for passenger movements. By April the impacts of COVID-19 were becoming clear and our schedules had effectively shut down Dawn blessing of new terminal in May domestic travel for anyone other than essential workers.
  • R/17/5/11122

    R/17/5/11122

    R/17/5/11122 Quality Assurance Statement: Quality Assurance Statement Version 2 December 2017 Southland District Status Draft Council Project Manager: 15 Forth Street Prepared by: AMP Trudy Saunders, Contracts Administrator Invercargill 9840 Author Telephone 0800 Reviewed by: Evan Pearce, Airport Manager 732 732 Approved for issue Council (27 February 2018) Fax: 0800 732 329 by: Te Anau Airport Manapouri AMP 2018-2048 Page i R/17/5/11122 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Purpose of this Plan ................................................................................................ 5 2. Activity Description ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 What We Do ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Why We Do It .......................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Objectives of the Te Anau Manapouri Airport Activity ............................................ 6 2.4 Overview of Management ....................................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Service Delivery Review ............................................................................