Highland Park Ford Plant: Documentation and Redevelopment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highland Park Ford Plant: Documentation and Redevelopment Highland Park Ilene R. Tyler Ford Plant: Documentation and Redevelopment Historic documentation is guiding strategies to preserve an important automotive site. Fig. 1. Highland Park Ford Plant, The Highland Park Ford Plant is located along Woodward Highland Park, Michigan, aerial view, April 25, 1927, illustrating Avenue in the Michigan community of Highland Park, the plant during its period of significance, 1910-1927, with its northwest of Detroit. Designed by noted industrial architect Albert Kahn, full build-out along Woodward the Highland Park Ford Plant, birthplace of the moving assembly line, was the Avenue. From the collections of scene of numerous inno vations in automotive mass production between 1910 The Henry Ford, Accession 1660, and 1926. The buildings are notable for their use of reinforced concrete and Box 130, image ID P-833-48953. brick, roofs that are either flat with monitors or saw-tooth, and other distinctive architectural features that are characteristic of Kahn’s industrial work. The Woodward Avenue Action Association (WA3) is an umbrella organization encompassing 11 local governments along the Woodward Avenue corridor from Detroit to Pontiac, Michigan. Formed in 1995 as a nonprofit corporation, the mission of WA3 is “to enhance and improve the visual, economic, functional and historic significance of the 27-mile Woodward Avenue Corridor through public, private, local and regional partnerships.”1 Documenting the vast, 100- acre urban landscape of the historic Highland Park Ford Plant was funded by the State Historic Preservation Office and the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. Quinn Evans Architects was hired in 2012 as consultants to lead the research, assessment, and documentation process.2 36 HIGHLAND PARK FORD PLANT The scope of the project included pro- Fig. 2. Panoramic view, c. ducing three guiding documents: a 1920s. In the 1920s Building cultural resource management plan OO (foreground) housed Ford’s offices and salesrooms, (CRMP) for the entire site, a historic a showpiece fronting on structures report (HSR) for three struc- Woodward Avenue. From the tures, and documents for a new local collections of The Henry Ford, historic district. Boundaries would in- Accession 833, Box 24, image corporate the previously designated Na- ID P.833.47603. tional Historic Landmark district. Each document had a defined purpose, but Fig. 3. Building AA, fourth the comprehensive study allowed for floor, Henry Ford Trade School overlapping efforts and shared research. students, 1922. This is the This paper describes how these docu- only photograph found of the ments were conceived and how they are interior of Building AA, fourth being used to guide redevelopment that floor. Machine shops and the three-story craneway were will protect the historic automotive site on the lower floors. From the and at the same time encourage compat- collections of The Henry Ford, ible new uses that will contribute to the Accession 1660, Box 167, local economy. image ID P.833.32685. Developmental History Fig. 4. West elevations of Buildings OO and AA, Dec. A well-researched history of the High- 10, 2014, viewed from across land Park site, the Ford Motor Com- Woodward Avenue. Boarded- pany, and Henry Ford himself was up windows indicate where essential for all of the documents but original windows were especially for the cultural resource man- removed. Both buildings are agement plan and historic structures vacant. Photograph by the author. report. The most complete primary sources were found in collections at the Bentley Historical Library at the Univer- sity of Michigan and at the Benson Ford Research Center in Dearborn, Michi- gan. Drawings and photographs in The story of the Highland Park Ford Highland Park offered a larger land area those collections confirmed how the site Plant actually begins elsewhere, first for development, proximity to railroad developed over time and when buildings near Dearborn, where Henry Ford was lines, and lower taxes than Detroit. In were added, thus documenting the pe- born in 1863, then later in downtown 1907 Ford purchased 60 acres there, riods of change. From this information, Detroit, where the Ford Motor Com- including a racetrack at the southwest the team compiled a history that ex- pany was founded in 1903. From the corner, which he intended to use as a plained both the evolution of the plant beginning Ford saw that his company’s test track for new cars. In 1918 Ford site and its importance to the history of future lay in producing inexpensive, purchased an additional 40 acres to the Highland Park. Much has been written durable vehicles that would appeal to north, along the railroad right-of-way. about Henry Ford and his Motor Com- a wide range of customers. He quickly This combined property provided room pany, enabling the team to recreate the outgrew his rented quarters on Mack for growth and was near major road- timeline of events and the sequence of Avenue in Detroit and in 1905 moved ways (Fig. 1). However, the one missing building construction. This information operations into his first purpose-built component of the transportation infra- was also summarized in the 1977 Na- factory, a plant at the corner of Piquette structure —access to water for shipping tional Historic Landmark nomination.3 and Beaubien streets. This second loca- finished vehicles and receiving raw ma- Well after the primary research was tion is where, in 1908, Ford and his en- terials — eventually caused the undoing completed, the original construction gineers designed and began assembling of the Highland Park site. Even while drawings for Buildings OO, NN, and the Model T. Within a year Ford was construction of Highland Park was un- AA were found in the archives at Albert again looking for more space. He found derway and production of the Model T Kahn Associates.4 it in Highland Park. was expanding every year, Ford had his eye on a site on the River Rouge near 37 APT BULLETIN JOURNAL OF PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY / 46:2-3 2015 Dearborn. Construction of the Rouge the site and the interiors of the buildings on paper and using iPad applications), Plant buildings began as early as 1917, require prearranged entrance through notations on reference floor plans but production did not begin there for secured checkpoints during specific and (copies of 1940s tenant plans, not the another ten years. A new vehicle, the limited hours. The plant is still a manu- original construction drawings), and Model A, was introduced in 1927 at the facturing site, and its owners have very a laser scan of the exterior envelope new plant; at the same time, production real concerns about security and safety. of the three buildings, plus an interior of the Model T was terminated, and the Most workers and all visitors, includ- scan of the three-story craneway in prominence of the Highland Park plant ing our team members, are logged in Building AA. Midwestern Consulting, ended. at the historic Manchester Street gate Inc., an engineering firm, captured the before being allowed to proceed into the laser-scan data using a Leica HDS 6000 Although Highland Park never pro- site. Fieldwork was scheduled during a with a high resolution of approximately duced another automobile after 1927, three-day period in October 2012, dur- 20 to 40 million data points per setup. the Ford Motor Company did not ing which time no inclement weather The initial plan was to perform scans abandon the site. The enormous facili- was anticipated. every 60 feet along the perimeter and ties were utilized to manufacture Ford approximately 40 feet away from the trucks and tractors, as well as Ford The former plant site is still used for in- building. A few additional scan setups automotive trim. Buildings constructed dustrial purposes, although with a low were added to acquire information that from 1919 to 1926 were used for the level of active use. It was important that was partially or fully obstructed by the company’s administrative offices and the team’s presence not impede ongoing scanner’s line of sight. The fieldwork automobile sales, machine shops, and work activities or movement of materi- included more than 50 scans taken in education (Figs. 2 and 3). These build- als. Some buildings did not require or one full day. Back in their office, Mid- ings remain today in the northwest merit inspection for documentation; western Consulting registered the scan corner of the site, abandoned and van- other buildings still owned by Ford setups, processing them to tie individual dalized but retaining their character- were opened only for a visual observa- scan worlds together into one compre- defining features (Fig. 4). They are re- tion, and the team was escorted quickly hensive point cloud. The engineers then ferred to as Buildings OO, NN, and AA, through them without being allowed to removed unnecessary scan data, such as all of which complemented the original collect any building data. Ownership neighboring street traffic, trees obstruct- Administrative Building O, Executive of two buildings included in the HSR ing the building, and pedestrians, and Garage N, and Assembly Plant A, which has been transferred to WA3; the rest unified the project point cloud, which were demolished in 1960. of the site remains in a complicated mix was then delivered to Quinn Evans of ownership and use and as a result Since the 1960s the Highland Park fa- Architects for use with Leica Cyclone received only a cursory overview inspec- cilities have been on the decline, and Cloudworx software. tion adequate for producing the cultural several of the remaining historic build- resource management plan. After the Interior spaces, like the suites of offices ings were demolished. At the same time study was completed, National Equity in Building OO, are impossible to scan recognition of the site’s historic signifi- Corporation, which had owned Build- with any efficiency, but the large open cance was growing.
Recommended publications
  • Michigan's Historic Preservation Plan
    Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Governor Rick Snyder Kevin Elsenheimer, Executive Director, Michigan State Housing Development Authority Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Written by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Michigan State Historic Preservation Office with assistance from Alan Levy and Kristine Kidorf Goaltrac, Inc. For more information on Michigan’s historic preservation programs visit michigan.gov/SHPo. The National Park Service (NPS), U. S. Department of the Interior, requires each State Historic Preservation Office to develop and publish a statewide historic preservation plan every five years. (Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual, Chapter 6, Section G) As required by NPS, Michigan’s Five-Year Historic Preservation Plan was developed with public input. The contents do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. The activity that is the subject of this project has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. However, the contents and opinions herein do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products herein constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilita- tion Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan
    2020–2025 MICHIGAN Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Working together, we can use the next five years to redefine the role of historic preservation in the state to ensure it remains relevant to Michigan’s future. State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by 300 North Washington Square Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Lansing, Michigan 48913 Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, Martha MacFarlane-Faes, Lansing, Michigan Deputy State Historic August 2020 Preservation Officer Mark Burton, CEO, With assistance from Michigan Economic Peter Dams, Dams & Associates, Development Corporation Plainwell, Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, This report has been financed entirely State of Michigan with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 Cover photo: Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse, Alpena County. Photo: Bryan Lijewski Michigan State Historic Preservation Office 2 Preservation Plan 2020–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Preservation Plan 2020-2025
    Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025 [COVER PHOTO] 1 State Historic Preservation Office Michigan Economic Development Corporation 300 N. Washington Square Lansing, Michigan 48913 Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Jeff Mason, CEO, Michigan Economic Development Corporation Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, State of Michigan Prepared by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner Michigan State Historic Preservation Office Lansing, Michigan December 2019 With assistance from Peter Dams, Dams & Associates This report has been financed entirely with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 2 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………… Vision………………………………………………………………………… Goal Summary Page…………………………………………………………. Working Together – Stories of Success 2014-2019 …………………………… A Look to the Future: Challenges and Opportunities……………………….…. Goals and Objectives……………………………………………………………. Goal 1: Targeted Preservation Education……………………………………... Goal2: Expand Preservation Funding Opportunities………………………… Goal 3: Increase Diversity in Historic Preservation…………………………. Goal 4: Build Stronger Partnerships………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan National Historic Landmarks
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS PROGRAM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LISTING OF NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS BY STATE MICHIGAN (42) SS BADGER (Car Ferry) ...................................................................................................................... 01/20/16 LUDINGTON, MASON COUNTY, MICHIGAN BAY VIEW ............................................................................................................................................. 12/23/87 BAY VIEW, EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN CALUMET HISTORIC DISTRICT ......................................................................................................... 03/28/89 CALUMET, HOUGHTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN CITY OF MILWAUKEE (Great Lakes Car Ferry) .................................................................................. 12/14/90 ELBERTA, BENZIE COUNTY, MICHIGAN COLUMBIA (Excursion Steamer) ......................................................................................................... 07/06/92 ECORSE, WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN CRANBROOK ....................................................................................................................................... 06/29/89 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN THE DETROIT INDUSTRY MURALS, DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ............................................ 04/22/14 DETROIT, WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN DOW, ALDEN, HOUSE AND STUDIO .................................................................................................06/29/89 MIDLAND, MIDLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN DOW, HERBERT H., HOUSE .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Birmingham Historic District Commission Meeting
    AGENDA BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MEETING MUNICIPAL BUILDING-COMMISSION ROOM-151 MARTIN STREET WEDNESDAY – February 5th, 2020 *********** 7:00 PM*********** 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the HDC Minutes of January 15th, 2019 3) Courtesy Review 4) Historic Design Review 5) Sign Review 6) Study Session 7) Miscellaneous Business and Communication A. Pre-Application Discussions B. Staff Reports 1. Administrative Sign Approvals 2. Administrative Approvals 3. Draft Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2025 4. January Demolitions 8) Adjournment Notice: Individuals requiring accommodations, such as interpreter services for effective participation in this meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (248) 530-1880 at least on day in advance of the public meeting. Las personas que requieren alojamiento, tales como servicios de interpretación, la participación efectiva en esta reunión deben ponerse en contacto con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al (248) 530- 1880 por lo menos el día antes de la reunión pública. (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2020 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the Historic District Commission (“HDC”) held Wednesday, January 15, 2020. Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1) ROLLCALL Present: Chairman John Henke; Vice-Chairman Keith Deyer; Board Members, Gigi Debbrecht, Natalia Dukas, Patricia Lang (arrived 7:15 p.m.); Student Representative Klea Ahmet Absent: Board Members Doug Burley, Michael Willoughby; Alternate Member Kevin Filthaut Administration: Nicholas Dupuis, City Planner Laura Eichenhorn, Transcriptionist 01-01-20 2) Approval Of Minutes Motion by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT-Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project
    This page left intentionally blank. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Application for Section 106 Review SHPO Use Only IN Received Date / / Log In Date / / OUT Response Date / / Log Out Date / / Sent Date / / Submit one copy for each project for which review is requested. This application is required. Please type. Applications must be complete for review to begin. Incomplete applications will be sent back to the applicant without comment. Send only the information and attachments requested on this application. Materials submitted for review cannot be returned. Due to limited resources we are unable to accept this application electronically. I. GENERAL INFORMATION THIS IS A NEW SUBMITTAL THIS IS MORE INFORMATION RELATING TO ER# 08-462 a. Project Name: Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project - Phased Sec. 106 Submittal; see Attachment A. b. Project Address (if available): Generally Woodward Avenue from Downtown Detroit to Michigan State Fairgrounds/8 Mile Road. c. Municipal Unit: Detroit and Highland Park County: Wayne d. Federal Agency, Contact Name and Mailing Address (If you do not know the federal agency involved in your project please contact the party requiring you to apply for Section 106 review, not the SHPO, for this information.): Tricia Harr, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, E43-105, Washington, DC, 20590; 202-366-0486 or [email protected] e. State Agency (if applicable), Contact Name and Mailing Address: Matt Webb, Project Manager, Michigan Department of Transportation, Van Wagoner Building, 425 West Ottawa Street, Lansing, MI, 48909 f. Consultant or Applicant Contact Information (if applicable) including mailing address: Tim Roseboom, Project Manager, Detroit Department of Transportation, 1301 East Warren, Detroit, MI, 48207; 313-833-1196 or [email protected] II.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT-Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project FEIS Archeological
    Table of Contents ABSTRACT 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 No Build Alternative .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Locally Preferred Alternative ................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.3 Park and Ride Lot .................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.4 Traction Power Substations ................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.5 Construction Staging Areas ................................................................................... 2-3 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Research Goals ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Background Research ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 National Historic Landmarks and Historic Districts .............................................. 3-1 3.2.2 Archaeological Sites .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT-DTOGS Development of Alternatives
    9. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES This section presents the methodology and a summary of the results of the third and final level of evaluation to facilitate the identification of an LPA for the DTOGS project. This section will cite data that is located several appendices to this report because of the volume of details the technical analysis required. Table 9-1 on the following page presents the refined evaluation criteria used in this analysis, which are based on the DTOGS project’s goals and objectives. This third level of analysis also adds a new goal: FTA New Starts Benchmarks. The key performance indicator associated with this goal is the cost effectiveness index (CEI), defined as the cost per new rider. Section 9.2 presents the detailed definition of this additional performance indicator. Following is an outline of Section 9: Evaluation of Alternatives to facilitate review of this section, along with a list of appendices produced for each analysis. Generally, this report presents the methodology first, then a summary of the results next. Section 9.1 Transportation and Mobility - Appendices: (H) Operating Plan; (I) Ridership Forecast Methodology and Results; (J) BRT and LRT Design Guidelines; (K) BRT and LRT Concept Plans and Typical Sections; and (L) Capital Cost Methodology and Results Section 9.2 FTA New Starts Benchmarks - Appendix: (M) Cost Effectiveness Index Calculations – Methodology and Results Section 9.3 Economic Opportunity and Investment - Appendix: (G) Land Use and Economic Impacts of the Gratiot, Michigan, and Woodward
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project FEIS Chapters 4, 5
    4.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 4.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 4.1 Introduction This chapter describes the environmental resources present in the Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit (LRT) study area and the potential environmental impacts, both positive and negative, that would occur with the No Build Alternative and with construction and operation of the Project Build Alternatives A1, B2, B3, and A4 (the Preferred Alternative). Aerial maps and diagrams of the alternatives are provided in Appendix D. Detailed data and information are provided in technical reports, as referenced in this chapter. Environmental resources and analyses presented in this chapter are as follows: • Air Quality • Parklands • Hazardous Materials • Visual and Aesthetics • Historic Resources • Utilities • Archaeological Resources • Energy • Noise • Construction Impacts • Vibration • Roadways and Level of Service • Environmental Justice • Stormwater Management • Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy • Natural Resources • Neighborhood Character • Indirect and Cumulative Effects • Community Facilities and Services Existing conditions are described for 2009 or 2010, when the data were collected for each of the environmental resource categories. Analysis years for potential construction- and operations- related impacts are 2012 and 2030, respectively. The discussion of each environmental resource is organized, as appropriate, by legal and regulatory context, methodology, existing conditions, long-term (operations-phase) effects, short-term (construction-phase) effects, and mitigation. 4.2 Air Quality 4.2.1 Legal and Regulatory Context Air quality is a term used to describe the amount of air pollution to which the public is exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT-Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project FEIS Section 106
    This page left intentionally blank. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Application for Section 106 Review SHPO Use Only IN Received Date / / Log In Date / / OUT Response Date / / Log Out Date / / Sent Date / / Submit one copy for each project for which review is requested. This application is required. Please type. Applications must be complete for review to begin. Incomplete applications will be sent back to the applicant without comment. Send only the information and attachments requested on this application. Materials submitted for review cannot be returned. Due to limited resources we are unable to accept this application electronically. I. GENERAL INFORMATION THIS IS A NEW SUBMITTAL THIS IS MORE INFORMATION RELATING TO ER# 08-462 a. Project Name: Woodward Avenue Light Rail Transit Project - Phased Sec. 106 Submittal; see Attachment A. b. Project Address (if available): Generally Woodward Avenue from Downtown Detroit to Michigan State Fairgrounds/8 Mile Road. c. Municipal Unit: Detroit and Highland Park County: Wayne d. Federal Agency, Contact Name and Mailing Address (If you do not know the federal agency involved in your project please contact the party requiring you to apply for Section 106 review, not the SHPO, for this information.): Tricia Harr, AICP, Environmental Protection Specialist, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, E43-105, Washington, DC, 20590; 202-366-0486 or [email protected] e. State Agency (if applicable), Contact Name and Mailing Address: N/A f. Consultant or Applicant Contact Information (if applicable) including mailing address: Tim Roseboom, Project Manager, Detroit Department of Transportation, 1301 East Warren, Detroit, MI, 48207; 313-833-1196 or [email protected] II.
    [Show full text]
  • [Re] PRESENTING DETROIT the Woodward Avenue Tour
    [re] PRESENTING DETROIT__ The Woodward Avenue Tour A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture in the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning by Natasha Reising Bachelor of Science in Architecture University of Cincinnati, 2009 Committee Chairs: Michael McInturf Aarati Kanekar I__ABSTRACT Jerry Herron predicts “Detroit, once a symbol of American competitive vitality, is now a symbol of the first urban domino to fall.” The buildings reveal this uniquely volatile urban narrative via architectural methods such as program, construction technique, and form in contrast between the neighborhoods. Instead of disintegrating into a ruin, Detroit’s collective memory of place will drive the reconstruction of Woodward Avenue as a cultural landmark, defining the city as a tourist hub. Architectural climax defines the narrative of the city, from the industrial building phase, through the infrastructural surge, and to this proposed tourism phase. By divorcing historic form from the lost original use and context, a new story can be inserted within the now malleable framework open for redesign to morph passive artifacts into active monuments (at varying scales). The collective memory is revealed and exaggerated along Woodward Avenue, the central spine of the city both physically (in plan and section) and culturally. The methodology of temporal collage combines this collective memory with progression of change and future projection to design architectural interjections along the Woodward Avenue Tour at thresholds between distinct experiential segments of the 27-mile artery.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of Former School Property & Fire Pump House 15900 Woodward Avenue Highland Park, Michi
    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT OF FORMER SCHOOL PROPERTY & FIRE PUMP HOUSE 15900 WOODWARD AVENUE HIGHLAND PARK, MICHIGAN CARDNO ATC PROJECT NO. N019721501 MAY 5, 2015 Prepared by: Prepared for: Cardno ATC City of Highland Park 46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Attn: Mr. Steve Schiller Novi, Michigan 48377 131 Pilgrim Street Phone: (248) 669-5140 Highland Park, Michigan 48203 Fax: (248) 669-5147 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Former School Property and Fire Pump House 15900 Woodward Avenue Highland Park, Michigan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Phase I ESA Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Identified Data Gaps ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Identified Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ................................................................... 6 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Detail Scope of Services ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Significant Assumption .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]