DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecoregions of New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ecoregions of New Mexico 20 Colorado Plateaus 20b Shale Deserts and Sedimentary Basins 22 20c Semiarid Benchlands and Canyonlands iver 20 R r 26 Mancos e 21 UTAH v i 20d Arid Canyonlands 21d 21 21j R COLORADO 20 26f a 21d t 21e 21g 21j on er 20b a 22b rr Riv l 21a a OKLAHOM r 21h 21d P 21j im 20d e 22a C 21 Southern Rockies a iv 20c Navajo 21g Dry 26f 26 L R Reservoir 21f 21d 21h 21c 21b 21e Raton 21a Alpine Zone 21b 21b as Capulin m Aztec 21f 21b 21a Shiprock Farmington ni Tierra 21g 21j 21f Volcano NM 21b Crystalline Subalpine Forests S A 21f Heron an Jua Amarilla n Res. 21b 21h 26h 21c Crystalline Mid-Elevation Forests Morgan River 21f 21d A Lake 21f 21g 25c El Vado 21e 21c 21a 21b 21d Foothill Woodlands and Shrublands 21f Reservoir 21b 26h 21h 21d 26l 21j 22f 21c 21a 21e Sedimentary Subalpine Forests e 21f 21c R d C 21d 21c Clayton i n o 21b h a 21e 21c 21f Sedimentary Mid-Elevation Forests r a 21b C 25e c 21f G 21f C o a 21c Taos n 21g Volcanic Subalpine Forests h 21e a a 21f R d m i 22n a i v o 21g a 21h Volcanic Mid-Elevation Forests CHU e 22i i n r R 21h 21f S 25b 21c N 21h 25 21j Grassland Parks 21f R 23 SKA Abiquiu T sh 21b i a 22h M v in W 21b e De-Na-Z Reservoir r O 21e MTNS T 23e IS R 21e C 21h 22 Arizona/New Mexico Plateau 21b21f E Chaco Culture NHP D 25c 21e 21e 22g E 21f 22a San Luis Shrublands and Hills 21c R 21g G 23c Ch N 21a Mora 22b San Luis Alluvial Flats and Wetlands aco A 26h W 21g S ash IDE 21g 21b 21e 22f Taos Plateau 21h 21g 21j 25e Los Alamos Mora River 22g Rio Grande Floodplain AL DIV 21c 21g 21a 26m 22h North Central New Mexico Valleys and Mesas Bandelier NM 21e Mosquero 21b 22i San Juan/Chaco Tablelands and Mesas Cochiti Santa 21f JEMEZ MTNS Reservoir 21c 21c 21d Fe Las Vegas 22j Semiarid Tablelands Gallup CONTINENT 25b Conchas 22k Lava Malpais J 22h Reservoir em 21d 22 23e NS e C 22l Plains of San Agustin z o n R c iv h e a r Ute 22m Albuquerque Basin r s ive 26 Bluewater R Reservoir ver 23c Reservoir Ri 22n Near-Rockies Valleys and Mesas ZUN 23c MATEO MT Bernalillo 23f SANDIA MTNS adian I MTNS 23d Can SAN 23g 23f 26h Tucumcari 23 Arizona/New Mexico Mountains 22g 23f ver Ri Grants P 26n 23a Chihuahuan Desert Slopes ni eco Zu Albuquerque s R Santa Rosa 23b Madrean Lower Montane Woodlands io San Jose Lake 26d ES 23e CARPMENT 23c Montane Conifer Forests ARIZONA 22m 23f Santa Rosa 22k K 23d Arizona/New Mexico Subalpine Forests 23e R ROC 22j iv CAP e 23e Conifer Woodlands and Savannas El Malpais 23e Los Lunas r NM 23c R Estancia 23f Rocky Mountain Conifer Forests i o P ANO MTNS 23g Rocky Mountain Subalpine Forests u 26p e r 22m c 26p 25i o Lake MANZ Sumner L 24 Chihuahuan Deserts 26h 26h 26p L Clovis 24a Chihuahuan Basins and Playas Fort Sumner 24b Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands A 23c 24c Low Mountains and Bajadas 23c N 25j 23e 26h 23e 24d Chihuahuan Montane Woodlands 23f 24f Rio Grande Floodplain O Portales 26h 26o 24g Gypsiferous Dunes 22l Socorro 24h Lava Malpais 23c 23d 24b 23c 23c SAN MA SAN FRANCISCO MTNS 23 23d 23e 25 High Plains PLAINS OF SAN23c AGUSTIN 23f E TEXAS 25b Rolling Sand Plains TEO M 24b Reserve 24d 25c Moderate Relief Plains 23d 23c S TNS 23f 23d Carrizozo 25e Canadian/Cimarron High Plains 23e 23c 24a 23f 23c 23f 23g T 25j 25i Llano Estacado r 23e e v 25j Shinnery Sands i 24b A 25k R 24h Bitter 23d 23e 25 E Lake 25k Arid Llano Estacado G M C N Roswell O A 23a G R Elephant 23g R O 23d 24h io M H 23c o do A L Butte n E 26 Southwestern Tablelands L O Reservoir S N K Two Rivers C o MTNS SACRAMENTO MT an c C Reservoir 26d Semiarid Canadian Breaks S Fr cis A D an A 24d 26q L L JORNADA DEL MUERTO E 25i B 26f Mesa de Maya/Black Mesa R T O O 23c 24c u Felix l a Rio 26h Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands and Savannas o r Truth Or Consequences i 24d R o s Caballo 23c 23d Reservoir a 24a 26l Upper Canadian Plateau S P 25k 24d A 26m Canadian Canyons 23b M 24g e N 23c c Lovington im 23f NS o b s 26n Conchas/Pecos Plains 24a 23b r r 25j e e s Artesia 24c A v E i R Alamogordo N R S i i 26o Central New Mexico Plains R o C v R D e A i r R Silver Pen~ v R White asco e E P Hobbs 26p Pluvial Lake Basins r M S 24 City Sands NM E Gila R N io T 26q Southern New Mexico Dissected Plains 24c M 24a 23c T Y N E G Brantley Reservoir CONTIN 24b r S L 24d L an Lake Avalon 79 Madrean Archipelago de A V 25j 24c 24b 24c GUADALUPE MTNS 79a Apachian Valleys and Low Hills 24c O Carlsbad 24c Lordsburg ENT 24c R 24b 79b Lower Madrean Woodlands G A 24b Salt N 23a 79c Madrean Pine-Oak and Mixed Conifer Forests AL 24d A Lake Deming M S 24b Las Cruces T O N R r DIVID k ive 79 S R c a 24a A l 79b L 24a B 24c U Carlsbad 24f T CITING THIS MAP: Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., E 23a Caverns NP 24d 24h McGraw, M.M., Jacobi, G.Z., Canavan, C.M., 24c 24b 24c Red Bluff Schrader, T.S., Mercer, D., Hill, R., and Moran, B.C., 24c 24b TEXAS 23 Reservoir 79b 79b 24c 2006, Ecoregions of New Mexico (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and 24c El Paso MEXICO photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological 15 10 5 0 30 60 mi 79b 79c Level III ecoregion Ciudad Juarez MTNS Survey (map scale 1:1,400,000). ANIMAS VALLEY 79c S MTNS 79b Level IV ecoregion 30 20 10 0 60 120 km CILLO 79b 79a County boundary Ecoregion maps, publications, GIS files, and contact ANIMA Albers equal area projection State boundary 24 Pecos PELON 79b Standard parallels 33˚ N and 36˚ N information are available at 79a International boundary 79b 79b Continental divide www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions.htm..
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico

    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico

    GEOLOGY AND GROUND - WATER RESOURCES OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, NEW MEXICO GROUND-WATER REPORT 2 Geology and Ground-Water Resources of San Miguel County, New Mexico BY R. L. GRIGGS AND G. E. HENDRICKSON Prepared in cooperation with The United States Bureau of Reclamation New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources and the New Mexico State Engineer NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES SOCORRO 1951 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX-OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ...................... Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ............................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Thomas M. Cramer, President ...................................................... Carlsbad Holm 0. Bursum, Jr., Secretary-Treasurer ........................................ Socorro Frank C. DiLuzio ..................................................................... Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz .................................................................................... Hobbs Cooper Shapley ............................................................................... Deming Contents Page ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 9 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 11 Location, area, and accessibility 11 Previous investigations
  • F.3 References for Appendix F

    F.3 References for Appendix F

    F-1 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F-2 F-3 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F.1 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE ECOREGIONS Ecoregions delineate areas that have a general similarity in their ecosystems and in the types, qualities, and quantities of their environmental resources. They are based on unique combinations of geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology (EPA 2004). Ecoregions are defined as areas having relative homogeneity in their ecological systems and their components. Factors associated with spatial differences in the quality and quantity of ecosystem components (including soils, vegetation, climate, geology, and physiography) are relatively homogeneous within an ecoregion. A number of individuals and organizations have characterized North America on the basis of ecoregions (e.g., Omernik 1987; CEC 1997; Bailey 1997). The intent of such ecoregion classifications has been to provide a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. The ecoregion discussions presented in this programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) follow the Level III ecoregion classification based on Omernik (1987) and refined through collaborations among U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional offices, state resource management agencies, and other federal agencies (EPA 2004). The following sections provide brief descriptions of each of the Level III ecoregions that have been identified for the 11 western states in which potential wind energy development may occur on BLM-administered lands.
  • Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain

    Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain

    92° 91° 90° 89° 88° Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Cape Girardeau 73cc 72 io Ri Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and Literature Cited: PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Shannen S. Chapman (Dynamac Corporation), Oh ver environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map Barbara A. Kleiss (USACE, ERDC -Waterways Experiment Station), James M. ILLINOIS assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary supplement): Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, Omernik, (USEPA, retired), Thomas L. Foti (Arkansas Natural Heritage p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. 71 the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Commission), and Elizabeth O. Murray (Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Planning Team). 37° environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999).
  • Chapter Two Characterization of the IWJV Landscape Principal Author: Patrick Donnelly

    Chapter Two Characterization of the IWJV Landscape Principal Author: Patrick Donnelly

    Chapter Two Characterization of the IWJV Landscape Principal Author: Patrick Donnelly Photo by Patrick Donnelly Inside this Chapter Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2.2 Ecological Setting ................................................................................................................ 2.3 • Northwestern Forested Mountains Ecological Region (162.2 million acres) ......................... 2.3 • North American Deserts Ecological Region (278.9 million acres) ........................................ 2.4 • Temperate Sierras Ecological Region (19.9 million acres) .................................................. 2.7 Defining an Ecological Framework ....................................................................................... 2.9 • Global/Intercontinental Scale (Level I Ecoregions) ............................................................. 2.9 • National/Sub-continental Scale (Level II Ecoregions) ....................................................... 2.10 • Regional Scale (Level III Ecoregions) .............................................................................. 2.12 • Local Scale (Level IV Ecoregions) ................................................................................... 2.14 Conservation Estate & Landownership Patterns ................................................................ 2.15 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................
  • Ecoregions of Texas

    Ecoregions of Texas

    Ecoregions of Texas 23 Arizona/New Mexico Mountains 26 Southwestern Tablelands 30 Edwards Plateau 23a Chihuahuan Desert Slopes 26a Canadian/Cimarron Breaks 30a Edwards Plateau Woodland 23b Montane Woodlands 26b Flat Tablelands and Valleys 30b Llano Uplift 24 Chihuahuan Deserts 26c Caprock Canyons, Badlands, and Breaks 30c Balcones Canyonlands 24a Chihuahuan Basins and Playas 26d Semiarid Canadian Breaks 30d Semiarid Edwards Plateau 24b Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands 27 Central Great Plains 31 Southern Texas Plains 24c Low Mountains and Bajadas 27h Red Prairie 31a Northern Nueces Alluvial Plains 24d Chihuahuan Montane Woodlands 27i Broken Red Plains 31b Semiarid Edwards Bajada 24e Stockton Plateau 27j Limestone Plains 31c Texas-Tamaulipan Thornscrub 25 High Plains 29 Cross Timbers 31d Rio Grande Floodplain and Terraces 25b Rolling Sand Plains 29b Eastern Cross Timbers 25e Canadian/Cimarron High Plains 29c Western Cross Timbers 25i Llano Estacado 29d Grand Prairie 25j Shinnery Sands 29e Limestone Cut Plain 25k Arid Llano Estacado 29f Carbonate Cross Timbers 25b 26a 26a 25b 25e Level III ecoregion 26d 300 60 120 mi Level IV ecoregion 26a Amarillo 27h 60 0 120 240 km County boundary 26c State boundary Albers equal area projection 27h 25i 26b 25j 27h 35g 35g 26b Wichita 29b 35a 35c Lubbock 26c Falls 33d 27i 29d Sherman 35a 25j Denton 33d 35c 32a 33f 35b 25j 26b Dallas 33f 35a 35b 27h 29f Fort 35b Worth 33a 26b Abilene 32c Tyler 29b 24c 29c 35b 23a Midland 26c 30d 35a El Paso 24a 23b Odessa 35b 24a 24b 25k 27j 33f Nacogdoches 24d Waco Pecos 25j
  • Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico

    Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico

    Report of Investigations No. 201 Stratigraphic Analysis of the Upper Devonian Woodford Formation, Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico John B. Comer* *Current address Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 47405 1991 Bureau of Economic Geology • W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-7508 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................5 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................................5 Age and Correlation ........................................................................................................6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................6 Western Outcrop Belt ......................................................................................................6 Central Texas ...................................................................................................................7 Northeastern Oklahoma
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History

    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History

    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
  • East Central Plains (Post Oak Savanna)

    East Central Plains (Post Oak Savanna)

    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN East Central Texas Plains (Post Oak Savanna) ECOREGION HANDBOOK August 2012 Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2012. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2012 – 2016: East Central Texas Plains Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 13 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 13 ISSUES ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 CONSERVATION ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 28 ECOREGION HANDBOOK FIGURES Figure 1. ECPL Ecoregion with County Boundaries ......................................................................................
  • Burned the Crucifixes and Other Religious Objects That Had Been Scattered in and Around the Pueblo. Otermin's Army Repeated This

    Burned the Crucifixes and Other Religious Objects That Had Been Scattered in and Around the Pueblo. Otermin's Army Repeated This

    burned the crucifixes and other religious objects not successful in reestablishing Spanish rule of that had been scattered in and around the the Pueblos, the interviews and explorations pueblo. Otermin's army repeated this ritual at Otermin and Mendoza conducted give the most Alamillo and Sevilleta. A short distance from complete picture of the effects of the revolt Sevilleta the army found deep pits where the among the pueblos. The Spanish presidio at El Indians had cached corn and protected it with a Paso sent two more punitive expeditions to New shrine of herbs. feathers and a clay vessel Mexico in 1688 and 1689 but it was not until the modeled with a human face and the body of a toad term of Governor Don Diego de Vargas (1690-1696) (Hackett and Shelby 1942:I:cxxix). On the march that New Mexico was reclaimed by Spain. from Socorro to Isleta. the army passed through the burned remains of four estancias. The The Aftermath of the Revolt estancia of Las Barrancas, located 23 leagues beyond Senecu and ten leagues downstream from Documentation of the 12-year period following the Isleta, was the only estancia that had not been Pueblo Revolt is scarce but speculation and greatly vandalized and burned (Hackett and Shelby conjecture abound. The more dramatic recon­ 1942:cxxx). structions of life among the Pueblos after the revolt show the Pueblos having destroyed every Otermin staged a surprise attack, taking Isleta vestige of Hispanic culture, including household Pueblo on December 6, 1681. About 500 Isleta and and religious objects, domesticated animals and Piro Indians were living in the village at the cereal crops.
  • Contents • Abbreviations • International Education Codes • Us Education Codes • Canadian Education Codes July 1, 2021

    Contents • Abbreviations • International Education Codes • Us Education Codes • Canadian Education Codes July 1, 2021

    CONTENTS • ABBREVIATIONS • INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION CODES • US EDUCATION CODES • CANADIAN EDUCATION CODES JULY 1, 2021 ABBREVIATIONS FOR ABBREVIATIONS FOR ABBREVIATIONS FOR STATES, TERRITORIES STATES, TERRITORIES STATES, TERRITORIES AND CANADIAN AND CANADIAN AND CANADIAN PROVINCES PROVINCES PROVINCES AL ALABAMA OH OHIO AK ALASKA OK OKLAHOMA CANADA AS AMERICAN SAMOA OR OREGON AB ALBERTA AZ ARIZONA PA PENNSYLVANIA BC BRITISH COLUMBIA AR ARKANSAS PR PUERTO RICO MB MANITOBA CA CALIFORNIA RI RHODE ISLAND NB NEW BRUNSWICK CO COLORADO SC SOUTH CAROLINA NF NEWFOUNDLAND CT CONNECTICUT SD SOUTH DAKOTA NT NORTHWEST TERRITORIES DE DELAWARE TN TENNESSEE NS NOVA SCOTIA DC DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TX TEXAS NU NUNAVUT FL FLORIDA UT UTAH ON ONTARIO GA GEORGIA VT VERMONT PE PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND GU GUAM VI US Virgin Islands QC QUEBEC HI HAWAII VA VIRGINIA SK SASKATCHEWAN ID IDAHO WA WASHINGTON YT YUKON TERRITORY IL ILLINOIS WV WEST VIRGINIA IN INDIANA WI WISCONSIN IA IOWA WY WYOMING KS KANSAS KY KENTUCKY LA LOUISIANA ME MAINE MD MARYLAND MA MASSACHUSETTS MI MICHIGAN MN MINNESOTA MS MISSISSIPPI MO MISSOURI MT MONTANA NE NEBRASKA NV NEVADA NH NEW HAMPSHIRE NJ NEW JERSEY NM NEW MEXICO NY NEW YORK NC NORTH CAROLINA ND NORTH DAKOTA MP NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS JULY 1, 2021 INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION CODES International Education RN/PN International Education RN/PN AFGHANISTAN AF99F00000 CHILE CL99F00000 ALAND ISLANDS AX99F00000 CHINA CN99F00000 ALBANIA AL99F00000 CHRISTMAS ISLAND CX99F00000 ALGERIA DZ99F00000 COCOS (KEELING) ISLANDS CC99F00000 ANDORRA AD99F00000 COLOMBIA
  • City of Portales Review of Water Supply Options

    City of Portales Review of Water Supply Options

    CITY OF PORTALES REVIEW OF WATER SUPPLY OPTIONS Prepared for City of Portales Prepared by Charles R. Wilson, Consultant, LLC Santa Fe, New Mexico November 2013 Executive Summary This report presents an overview of optional sources of municipal water supply to supplement Portales’ current supply from the Blackwater Wellfield. Consideration has been given to obtaining supplemental supplies from shallow groundwater, deep groundwater, and surface water from Ute Reservoir. In addition, the report reviews alternatives for reducing water demands including wastewater recycling as well as other water conservation measures. Shallow Groundwater. Shallow groundwater from the Ogallala Aquifer in the vicinity of Portales does not provide a sustainable supply for municipal use. It has become limited in quantity and the City’s Blackwater Wellfield may be unable to support the current rate of use within 10 to 15 years. In the longer term, shallow groundwater can only be considered as a low yield, emergency water source. However, the aquifer could be used to store excess water when available from other sources, such as Ute Reservoir. Deep Groundwater. Deep groundwater from below the Ogallala Aquifer is not a promising water supply alternative for east-central New Mexico. Any water that could be available from this source would be expensive to access, of low quality, and likely also of low quantity. Further, deep groundwater would not be a renewable source of supply. nPursuit of deep groundwater in the Roosevelt – Curry County area would be costly, have a high probability of failure, and is not recommended at this time. Ute Reservoir. A surface water supply from Ute Reservoir on the Canadian River is the only available alternative that would provide Portales with a demonstrated, renewable water supply in sufficient quantity for municipal use.
  • Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge, Final Comprehensive Conservation

    Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge, Final Comprehensive Conservation

    Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 2000 Prepared For: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 134 Union Blvd., Suite 350 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Prepared by: Research Management Consultants, Inc. 1746 Cole Blvd., Suite 300 Golden, Colorado 80401 Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000 3 Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Approval U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 4 Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan - September 2000 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 7 Vision .............................................................................................................. 10 Introduction Regional Setting ........................................................................................ 11 Refuge Purpose Statements .................................................................... 12 Planning Perspectives and Considerations Purpose of and Need for the Plan ........................................................... 15 Planning Process ....................................................................................... 16 Planning Perspectives ............................................................................... 17 Expected Planning Outcomes .................................................................. 17 The Ecosystem Approach to Management ...........................................