DOCSLIB.ORG

The Boulton and Watt Archive and the Matthew Boulton Papers from Birmingham Central Library Part 13: Boulton & Watt Correspondence and Papers (MS 3147/3/286­404)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Boulton and Watt Archive and the Matthew Boulton Papers from Birmingham Central Library Part 13: Boulton & Watt Correspondence and Papers (MS 3147/3/286­404) INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: A DOCUMENTARY HISTORY Series One: The Boulton and Watt Archive and the Matthew Boulton Papers from Birmingham Central Library Part 13: Boulton & Watt Correspondence and Papers (MS 3147/3/286­404) DETAILED LISTING REEL 242 3/387 General Correspondence, C (103 items) 1. Letter. Jn. Bte. Cabanyes & Co. (Barcelona) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 1 Jan. 1792. Informing Boulton & Watt of the new organisation of the firm. Prices of brandies, wheat and cod. [This letter is written on the inside of a printed circular which details Cabanyes’ former partnership with the late Joseph Molins and his new business with John Artis.] 2. Letter. Andrew Jeremiah Cabrit (Birmingham) to James Watt (Harper’s Hill). 12 Jun. 1786. Docketed “About Fleming’s counterfeiting copying machines.” Does not know rates of exchange between Leipzig and London. Two visiting merchants from Warsaw are interested in the copying machine but are more taken with a portable version they saw in London, made by one Flemming. Details of Flemming’s press. 3. Letter. Felix Calvert & Co. per John Field (London) to James Watt [?] [Soho]. 19 Mar. 1787. Mr. Calvert does not trust the gudgeon Boulton & Watt sent. Where should they send it as it is of no use. 4. Letter. Felix Calvert & Co. per Capell Wall (London) to Boulton & Watt [Soho]. 19 Feb. 1789. Arrangements for payment. 5. Letter. Calverts Morrell & Cole (London) to Boulton & Watt [Soho]. 12 Jul. 1787. Docketed as John Calvert & Co. Can the engine materials be sent by land. 6. Letter (in French). Jean Cambiaso de Dgue. (Leghorn) to Boulton & Watt (London). 3 Oct. 1788. Has received a bill of exchange from John Motteux & Co. endorsed by Boulton & Watt in his favour. Sending various bills of exchange in return. [The total of the bills is marked “Entd. 281 p. J[ames] P[earson].”] 7. Letter (in French). Jean Cambiaso de Dgue. (Leghorn) to Boulton & Watt (London). 6 Oct. 1788. Sending further bills of exchange. [The total of the bills is marked “Entd. 281 p. J[ames] P[earson].” This letter was forwarded by John Motteux & Co.] On the same sheet: Transcript of Cambiaso’s previous letter of 3 Oct. 1788. 8. Letter (in French). Jean Cambiaso de Dgue. (Leghorn) to Boulton & Watt (London). 10 Oct. 1788. Sending further bills of exchange. [The total of the bills is marked “Entd. 283 p. J[ames] P[earson].”] On the same sheet: Transcript of Cambiaso’s previous letter of 6 Oct. 1788. 9. Letter (in French). Jean Cambiaso de Dgue. (Leghorn) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 5 Dec. 1788. Has received Boulton & Watt’s letter informing him of the receipt of all his bills repaying the bill Boulton & Watt sent him through John Motteux & Co. Hopes Boulton & Watt will use him again. 10. Letter. Hay Campbell (London) to James Watt [Soho]. 29 Apr. 1798. Has seen Mr. Benneuil’s agent – his presses seem different to James Watt’s. Has signed the Attorney General’s report saying that Benneuil can patent his invention at his own risk. This leaves Mr. Mcregor [?] free to follow his own practice. Introducing Thomas Black, the son of his gardener, who is seeking employment as a wheel wright or mill wright. 11. Letter. H. Campbell (Southwark) to Boulton & Watt (“Steam Engine Manufactory”). 11 Aug. 1792. Enquiring about the time and cost of getting one or more engines. 12. Letter. William Carr (Liverpool) to Boulton & Watt [Soho]. 4 Mar. 1790. Enquiring about the power, cost and coal consumption of Boulton & Watt’s 20 inch cylinder engine. 13. Letter. William Carr (Liverpool) to Boulton & Watt [Soho]. 10 Mar. 1790. Questions about the water supply for the engine. Wants it for carding, roving and spinning cotton. Details of his works. 14. Memorandum. Note on William Carr. Mar. 1790. Information from Hammond & Co. on the good character of Carr. By J. L. [James Lawson]. 15. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 8 Aug. 1788. Enquiring about 12, 16 and 20 horse engines for his weaving and spinning mill at Retford. Which parts can he get cast in the North. Sketch of the layout of the mill. 16. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt [Birmingham]. 9 Aug. 1788. Omitted to ask the dimensions of the beam. Can get good timber. Can they give him the dimensions of the shaft linking the engine to the mill work. 17. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 15 Aug. 1788. Notes what they say about the “engine intended for the distiller”. Wants to talk to a Boulton & Watt engineer and show him machinery in operation at Doncaster and the site at Retford. Requesting the price of copper for the boiler. Understands from John Rennie that their “patent grate for consuming the smoke” is fitted without extra expense. Requesting information on a Birmingham thermometer manufacturer. 18. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt [Birmingham]. 19 Aug. 1788. Will be at Retford earlier than he previously thought. Thoughts about the size of the engine he needs. Requesting an estimate of a 21½ horse engine. 19. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 15 Sep. 1788. Requesting an estimate of a 10 horse engine. Would have rather had one larger engine to power the whole mill when both halves were finished rather than two smaller engines. Questions about boilers. Boulton & Watt should allow people premium reductions if they buy engines more powerful than they initially need with the view of extending their works later. 20. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 30 Oct. 1788. Returning the agreement. Wants to be able to move the engine wherever he wants. Can Boulton & Watt enquire about an auction of spinning frames in Birmingham for him. Has not heard of cast iron nails. John Rennie is very busy – proposes Thomas Lowe of Nottingham as mill wright. What should the upright shaft be made of. What parts can he get cast at Chesterfield or Sheffield. 21. Letter. John Cartwright (Marnham) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 23 Dec. 1788. Docketed as 28 Dec. Docketed “Ordering 30 horse engine.” Is now devoting the Retford mill to wool spinning so needs a more powerful engine. Orders as powerful an engine as possible up to 30 horses, with the intention of ordering a second one. Various alterations to his machinery, engine house etc. 22. Letter. John Cartwright (Buxton) to Boulton & Watt [Birmingham]. 2 Nov. 1789. Requesting copies of the Soho Sick Club rules and Dr. Priestley’s tract on such clubs. His plans to introduce a sick club scheme for his workforce. 23. Letter. Richard Cartwright (Gainsborough) to James Watt (Harper’s Hill). 16 Sep. 1787. Mr. Morehouse’s engine is ready but the steam pipe has not arrived. Progress with ? [letter torn] & Howton’s engine – Thomas Baker has been with them. Howton wishes to alter his boiler and wants Cartwright to come to Hull. [This letter was passed to James Pearson.] 24. Letter. Kary & Co. (Genoa) to Matthew Boulton (Soho). — 1790. Docketed as Cary & Co. See under K for a further letter from Kary & Co. Want to establish steam­powered flour mills for the city. C. W. Toney recommends Boulton & Watt’s engines. Requesting details and costs. Also want rollers for rolling metal. 25a. Memorandum. Protest of John Stroker, Notary Public (Dublin) on Thomas Caulfield’s refusal to accept Boulton & Watt’s bill. 29 Feb. 1788. Docketed “Protest of bill on Thomas Caulfield a Member of the Irish Parliament.” Kept with (b) and (c) below. b. Bill of Exchange to Thomas Caulfield, Moy, Armagh. 14 Nov. 1787. Bill for payment by William Matthews, 14 Nov. 1787, endorsed by Matthews for payment to Nesbitt & Stewart. Nesbitt & Stewart submitted the bill to the Notary Public John Stroker. c. Memorandum. Staples & Caulfield’s account delivered to Matthew Boulton. 13 Feb. 1789. [In James Pearson’s hand.] 26. Memorandum. John Champion (Bristol) – Account of Mill. — Jul. 1790. In John Southern’s hand. 27. Letter. John Champion (Bristol) to Charles Lloyd (Birmingham). 15 Jul. 1790. Forwarded by Lloyd to James Watt . 28. Letter. John Champion (Bristol) to John Southern (Soho). 19 Nov. 1793. The sheet has been used for calculations by Southern. 29a. Letter. John Chapman (Newcastle) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 10 Aug. 1790. Price of coal and of shipping it to Nantes. b. Wrapper for the above letter. The wrapper has the account of shipping coal on the reverse. 30. Letter. John & Robert Chapman (Newcastle) to Boulton & Watt [Soho]. 2 Nov. 1791. Docketed “Coals for Nantes.” Price of coal and of shipping it to Nantes. 31. Letter. John & Robert Chapman (Newcastle) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 13 Jan. 1792. Have not been able to hire a ship for France at Boulton & Watt’s price because it is winter. 32. Letter. John & Robert Chapman (Newcastle) to Boulton & Watt (Birmingham). 16 Jan. 1792. Will put Boulton & Watt’s advert for engine smiths and smiths in the papers. What wages can they engage to give. Have arranged a ship to take coal to Nantes. [William Forman and James Watt have used the sheet for notes for their reply on the level of wages.] 33. Letter. William Chapman (Naas) to James Watt (Birmingham). 8 Nov. 1787. Discussion of techniques of canal lock construction – deficiency of British canal engineers. Is glad that Watt disuaded him from taking out a patent because the method, “Dubie’s Method”, had been described by Bellidor. Mr. Coakley has not replied. Sorry to hear that Thomas Williams has so much hold over them. 34. Letter. William Chapman (Naas) to James Watt (Birmingham). 25 Jul. 1788. Has not heard from Watt for a long time. Congratulating Matthew Boulton on the coinage contract.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lunar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18Th Century Great Britain
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2011 The unL ar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18th Century Great Britain Scott H. Zurawel Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Zurawel, Scott H., "The unL ar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in 18th Century Great Britain" (2011). Honors Theses. 1092. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/1092 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i THE LUNAR SOCIETY OF BIRMINGHAM AND THE PRACTICE OF SCIENCE IN 18TH CENTURY GREAT BRITAIN: A STUDY OF JOSPEH PRIESTLEY, JAMES WATT AND WILLIAM WITHERING By Scott Henry Zurawel ******* Submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE March, 2011 ii ABSTRACT Zurawel, Scott The Lunar Society of Birmingham and the Practice of Science in Eighteenth-Century Great Britain: A Study of Joseph Priestley, James Watt, and William Withering This thesis examines the scientific and technological advancements facilitated by members of the Lunar Society of Birmingham in eighteenth-century Britain. The study relies on a number of primary sources, which range from the regular correspondence of its members to their various published scientific works. The secondary sources used for this project range from comprehensive books about the society as a whole to sources concentrating on particular members.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10 Long Title.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15382-9 - Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity, 1750-1914 Christine MacLeod Index More information Index Acade´mie des Sciences 80, 122, 357 arms manufacturers 236–9 Adam, Robert 346 Armstrong, William, Baron Armstrong of Adams, John Couch 369 Cragside Aikin, John 43, 44, 71 arms manufacturer 220 Airy, Sir George 188, 360 as hero of industry 332 Albert, Prince 24, 216, 217, 231, 232, 260 concepts of invention 268, 269, 270 Alfred, King 24 entrepreneurial abilities of 328 Amalgamated Society of Engineers, knighted 237–8 Machinists, Millwrights, Smiths and monument to 237 Pattern Makers 286–7 opposition to patent system 250, 267–8 ancestor worship, see idolatry portrait of 230 Anderson’s Institution, Glasgow 113, 114, president of BAAS 355 288, 289 Punch’s ‘Lord Bomb’ 224–5 Arago, Franc¸ois 122, 148, 184 Ashton, T. S. 143 Eloge, to James Watt 122–3, 127 Athenaeum, The 99–101, 369 Arkwright, Sir Richard, Atkinson, T. L. 201 and scientific training 359 Atlantic telegraph cables 243, 245, 327 as national benefactor 282 Arthur, King 15 as workers’ hero 286 Askrill, Robert 213 commemorations of, 259 Associated Society of Locomotive Cromford mills, painting of 63 Engineers and Firemen 288 enterprise of 196, 327, 329 era of 144 Babbage, Charles 276, 353, 356–7, factory system 179 375, 383 in Erasmus Darwin’s poetry 67–8 Bacon, Sir Francis in Maria Edgeworth’s book 171 as discoverer 196 in Samuel Smiles’ books 255, 256 as genius 51, 53, 142 invention of textile machinery 174, 176 bust of 349 knighthood 65 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Soho Depicted: Prints, Drawings and Watercolours of Matthew Boulton, His Manufactory and Estate, 1760-1809
    SOHO DEPICTED: PRINTS, DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS OF MATTHEW BOULTON, HIS MANUFACTORY AND ESTATE, 1760-1809 by VALERIE ANN LOGGIE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis explores the ways in which the industrialist Matthew Boulton (1728-1809) used images of his manufactory and of himself to help develop what would now be considered a ‘brand’. The argument draws heavily on archival research into the commissioning process, authorship and reception of these depictions. Such information is rarely available when studying prints and allows consideration of these images in a new light but also contributes to a wider debate on British eighteenth-century print culture. The first chapter argues that Boulton used images to convey messages about the output of his businesses, to draw together a diverse range of products and associate them with one site. Chapter two explores the setting of the manufactory and the surrounding estate, outlining Boulton’s motivation for creating the parkland and considering the ways in which it was depicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicentenary Programme Celebrating the Life and Legacy of James Watt
    Bicentenary programme celebrating the life and legacy of James Watt 2019 marks the 200th anniversary of the death of the steam engineer James Watt (1736-1819), one of the most important historic figures connected with Birmingham and the Midlands. Born in Greenock in Scotland in 1736, Watt moved to Birmingham in 1774 to enter into a partnership with the metalware manufacturer Matthew Boulton. The Boulton & Watt steam engine was to become, quite literally, one of the drivers of the Industrial Revolution in Britain and around the world. Although best known for his steam engine work, Watt was a man of many other talents. At the start of his career he worked as both a mathematical instrument maker and a civil engineer. In 1780 he invented the first reliable document copier. He was also a talented chemist who was jointly responsible for proving that water is a compound rather than an element. He was a member of the famous Lunar Portrait of James Watt by Sir Thomas Lawrence, 1812 Society of Birmingham, along with other Photo by Birmingham Museums Trust leading thinkers such as Matthew Boulton, Erasmus Darwin, Joseph Priestley and The 2019 James Watt Bicentenary Josiah Wedgwood. commemorative programme is The Boulton & Watt steam engine business coordinated by the Lunar Society. was highly successful and Watt became a We are delighted to be able to offer wealthy man. In 1790 he built a new house, a wide-ranging programme of events Heathfield Hall in Handsworth (demolished and activities in partnership with a in 1927). host of other Birmingham organisations. Following his retirement in 1800 he continued to develop new inventions For more information about the in his workshop at Heathfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Boutlon and Francis Eginton's Mechanical
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository MATTHEW BOULTON AND FRANCIS EGINTON’S MECHANICAL PAINTINGS: PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION 1777 TO 1781 by BARBARA FOGARTY A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham June 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The mechanical paintings of Matthew Boulton and Francis Eginton have been the subject of few scholarly publications since their invention in the 1770s. Such interest as there has been has focussed on the unknown process, and the lack of scientific material analysis has resulted in several confusing theories of production. This thesis’s use of the Archives of Soho, containing Boulton’s business papers, has cast light on the production and consumption of mechanical paintings, while collaboration with the British Museum, and their new scientific evidence, have both supported and challenged the archival evidence. This thesis seeks to prove various propositions about authenticity, the role of class and taste in the selection of artists and subjects for mechanical painting reproduction, and the role played by the reproductive process’s ingenuity in marketing the finished product.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catechism of the Steam Engine by John Bourne</H1>
    A Catechism of the Steam Engine by John Bourne A Catechism of the Steam Engine by John Bourne Produced by Robert Connal and PG Distributed Proofreaders from images generously provided by the Digital & Multimedia Center, Michigan State University Libraries. A CATECHISM OF THE STEAM ENGINE IN ITS VARIOUS APPLICATIONS TO MINES, MILLS, STEAM NAVIGATION, RAILWAYS, AND AGRICULTURE. WITH PRACTICAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF ENGINES OF EVERY CLASS. BY page 1 / 559 JOHN BOURNE, C.E. _NEW AND REVISED EDITION._ [Transcriber's Note: Inconsistencies in chapter headings and numbering of paragraphs and illustrations have been retained in this edition.] PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION. For some years past a new edition of this work has been called for, but I was unwilling to allow a new edition to go forth with all the original faults of the work upon its head, and I have been too much engaged in the practical construction of steam ships and steam engines to find time for the thorough revision which I knew the work required. At length, however, I have sufficiently disengaged myself from these onerous pursuits to accomplish this necessary revision; and I now offer the work to the public, with the confidence that it will be found better deserving of the favorable acceptation and high praise it has already received. There are very few errors, either of fact or of inference, in the early editions, which I have had to correct; but there are many omissions which I have had to supply, and faults of arrangement and classification which I have had to rectify.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting and Labour Control at Boulton and Watt, C. 1775-1810
    This is a repository copy of Accounting and Labour Control at Boulton and Watt, c. 1775- 1810. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/11233/ Monograph: Toms, S. (2010) Accounting and Labour Control at Boulton and Watt, c. 1775-1810. Working Paper. Department of Management Studies, University of York Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 11233 Working Paper Toms, S (2010) Accounting and Labour Control at Boulton and Watt, c. 1775-1810 Working paper number 52. White Rose Research Online [email protected] University of York The York Management School Working Paper No. 52 ISSN Number: 1743-4041 March 2010 Accounting and Labour Control at Boulton and Watt, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Women, Developing Roles and Identitiesc.1760-1860Katrina Maitland-Brown MAA Thesis Submitted in Partia
    Fulfilling Roles: Midland Women, developing roles and identities C.1760-1860 Katrina Maitland-Brown MA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Katrina Maitland-Brown to be identified as the author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature……………………………. Date…………………………………. Abstract This thesis examines the lives of a group of Midland women in the period c. 1760- 1860. They were the wives, sisters, daughters and mothers of the middle-class entrepreneurial and professional men of the region. During this period the Midlands produced individuals who expanded production and commerce, often with little technical innovation, but with a shrewd sense of what was marketable. Men such as the Wedgwoods, Boultons and Kenricks built businesses, sponsored canals and highways, and invented, produced and sold an ever-expanding supply of goods world-wide. Yet while the lives of such men have been celebrated, the women of these families have often been overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Hog Chains and Mark Twains: a Study of Labor History, Archaeology, and Industrial Ethnography of the Steamboat Era of the Monongahela Valley 1811-1950
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2014 HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Copyright 2014 Marc Nicholas Henshaw Recommended Citation Henshaw, Marc Nicholas, "HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950", Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2014. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/790 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons HOG CHAINS AND MARK TWAINS: A STUDY OF LABOR HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND INDUSTRIAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE STEAMBOAT ERA OF THE MONONGAHELA VALLEY 1811-1950 By Marc Nicholas Henshaw A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Industrial Heritage and Archeology MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2014 This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Industrial Heritage and Archeology Department of Social Sciences Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Susan Martin Committee Member: Dr. Hugh Gorman Committee Member: Dr. Carol MacLennan Committee Member: Dr. John Nass Department Chair: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: SERIES ONE: the Boulton and Watt Archive, Parts 2 and 3
    INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: SERIES ONE: The Boulton and Watt Archive, Parts 2 and 3 Publisher's Note - Part - 3 Over 3500 drawings covering some 272 separate engines are brought together in this section devoted to original manuscript plans and diagrams. Watt’s original engine was a single-acting device for producing a reciprocating stroke. It had an efficiency four times that of the atmospheric engine and was used extensively for pumping water at reservoirs, by brine works, breweries, distilleries, and in the metal mines of Cornwall. To begin with it played a relatively small part in the coal industry. In the iron industry these early engines were used to raise water to turn the great wheels which operated the bellows, forge hammers, and rolling mills. Even at this first stage of development it had important effects on output. However, Watt was extremely keen to make improvements on his initial invention. His mind had long been busy with the idea of converting the to and fro action into a rotary movement, capable of turning machinery and this was made possible by a number of devices, including the 'sun-and-planet', a patent for which was taken out in 1781. In the following year came the double-acting, rotative engine, in 1784 the parallel motion engine, and in 1788, a device known as the 'governor', which gave the greater regularity and smoothness of working essential in a prime mover for the more delicate and intricate of industrial processes. The introduction of the rotative engine was a momentous event. By 1800 Boulton and Watt had built and put into operation over 500 engines, a large majority being of the 'sun and planet type'.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining a Royal Privilege in France for the Watt Engine, 1776-1786 Paul Naegel, Pierre Teissier
    Obtaining a Royal Privilege in France for the Watt Engine, 1776-1786 Paul Naegel, Pierre Teissier To cite this version: Paul Naegel, Pierre Teissier. Obtaining a Royal Privilege in France for the Watt Engine, 1776- 1786. The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology, 2013, 83, pp.96 - 118. 10.1179/1758120612Z.00000000021. hal-01591127 HAL Id: hal-01591127 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591127 Submitted on 20 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. int. j. for the history of eng. & tech., Vol. 83 No. 1, January 2013, 96–118 Obtaining a Royal Privilege in France for the Watt Engine (1776–1786) Paul Naegel and Pierre Teissier Centre François Viète, Université de Nantes, France Based on unpublished correspondence and legal acts, the article tells an unknown episode of Boulton and Watt’s entrepreneurial saga in eighteenth- century Europe. While the Watt engine had been patented in 1769 in Britain, the two associates sought to protect their invention across the Channel in the 1770s. They coordinated a pragmatic strategy to enrol native allies who helped them to obtain in 1778 an exclusive privilege from the King’s Council to exploit their engine but this had the express condition of its superiority being proven before experts of the Royal Academy of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Teacher’S Kit
    Industrial Heritage - The Textile Industry Education Teacher’s Kit Background There is archaeological evidence of textile production in Britain from the late-prehistoric period onwards. For many thousands of years wool was the staple textile product of Britain. The dominance of wool in the British textile industry changed rapidly during the eighteenth century with the development of mechanised silk production and then mechanised cotton production. By the mid-nineteenth century all four major branches of the textile industry (cotton, wool, flax, hemp and jute and silk) had been mechanised and the British landscape was dominated by over 10,000 mill buildings with their distinctive chimneys. Overseas competition led to a decline in the textile industry in the mid-twentieth century. Today woollen production is once again the dominant part of the sector together with artificial and man-made fibres, although output is much reduced from historic levels. Innovation Thomas Lombe’s silk mill, built in 1721, is regarded as the first factory-based textile mill in Britain. However, it was not until the handloom was developed following the introduction of John Kay’s flying shuttle in 1733 that other branches of the textile industry (notably cotton and wool) became increasingly mechanised. In the second half of the eighteenth century, a succession of major innovations including James Hargreaves’s spinning jenny (1764), Richard Arkwright’s water frame (1769), his carding engine (1775), and Samuel Crompton’s mule (1779), revolutionised the preparation and spinning of cotton and wool and led to the establishment of textile factories where several machines were housed under one roof.
    [Show full text]