DOCSLIB.ORG

Simulation Tools to Build Urban-Scale Energy Models: a Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simulation Tools to Build Urban-Scale Energy Models: a Review energies Review Simulation Tools to Build Urban-Scale Energy Models: A Review Alaia Sola *, Cristina Corchero, Jaume Salom and Manel Sanmarti IREC Catalonia Institute for Energy Research, 08930 Sant Adrià de Besòs, Spain; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-933-562-615 Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 16 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: The development of Urban-Scale Energy Modelling (USEM) at the district or city level is currently the goal of many research groups due to the increased interest in evaluating the impact of energy efficiency measures in city environments. Because USEM comprises a great variety of analysis areas, the simulation programs that are able to model urban-scale energy systems actually consist of an assemblage of different particular sub-models. In order to simulate each of the sub-models in USEM, one can choose to use either existing specific simulation engines or tailor-made models. Engines or tools for simulation of urban-scale energy systems have already been overviewed in previous existing literature, however the distinction and classification of tools according to their functionalities within each analysis area in USEM has not been clearly presented. Therefore, the present work aims at reviewing the existing tools while classifying them according to their capabilities. The ultimate goal of this classification is to expose the available resources for implementing new co-simulation approaches in USEM, which may reduce the modelling effort and increase reliability as a result of using established and validated simulation engines. Keywords: urban modelling; co-simulation; simulation engines; building stock energy demand 1. Introduction Cities have proved to be one of the largest energy consumer groups and emitters of greenhouse gases in the world [1]. Consequently, urban areas offer a large potential for energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gases mitigation. One of the key aspects to evolve towards a more sustainable city energy system is to develop integrated or multi-energy systems, where electricity, heating, cooling, and transport interact with each other at various levels. This new urban energy paradigm presents challenges and uncertainty of systems interaction. In order to assess the behavior of urban energy systems, the research field of multi-domain Urban-Scale Energy Modelling (USEM) has experienced a considerable progress in the recent years. USEM platforms are being developed and used as means of anticipating the resulting performance of different scenarios and/or finding the optimal scenario according to given criteria. In fact, USEM comprises a great variety of analysis areas, thus USEM platforms (i.e., simulation programs able to model urban-scale energy systems) actually represent an assemblage of different particular sub-models, as depicted in Figure1. A sub-model in this context is defined as a model developed specifically to reproduce the behavior of a sub-system within the urban context, aiming at estimating the performance of a simpler system compared to the more complex overall urban-scale energy system. Based on the previous statements, modelling tools are defined as either specific simulation engines or tailor-made models capable of simulating one part of the urban energy system (one or multiple sub-models). In contrast, heterogeneous USEM platforms are capable of simulating a broad urban energy system including different sub-models. It has been noticed by the authors that the distinction Energies 2018, 11, 3269; doi:10.3390/en11123269 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Energies 2018, 11, 3269 2 of 24 Energies 2018, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 23 between the existing modelling tools and the existing heterogeneous USEM platforms has been partly been partly omitted in existing reviews. However, it is believed that these two concepts must be omitted in existing reviews. However, it is believed that these two concepts must be differentiated. differentiated. Towards this end, the present review article aims at strictly focusing on the state-of- Towards this end, the present review article aims at strictly focusing on the state-of-the-art of the the-art of the relevant available simulation engines for each sub-model in USEM. relevant available simulation engines for each sub-model in USEM. Figure 1. Sub-models in Urban-Scale Energy Modelling platforms. Figure 1. Sub-models in Urban-Scale Energy Modelling platforms. Engines or tools for the simulation of urban-scale energy systems have already been overviewed in previousEngines existing or tools literature for the simulation [2,3]. However, of urban-scal the classificatione energy systems of the tools have by already their functionalitiesbeen overviewed for thein previous simulation existing of each literature sub-model [2,3]. (i.e., However, each basic the analysis classification area) that of the a complete tools by their USEM functionalities platform should for includethe simulation has not beenof each clearly sub-model presented. (i.e., Therefore, each basic the analysis present workarea) aims that ata reviewingcomplete theUSEM existing platform tools whileshould classifying include has them not according been clearly to their presented. capabilities Therefore, related tothe each present sub-model work inaims USEM. at reviewing The ultimate the goalexisting of thistools classification while classifying is to expose them theaccording available to resourcestheir capabilities for implementing related to each new co-simulationsub-model in approachesUSEM. The inultimate USEM, goal which of this may classification reduce the modelling is to expose effort the andavailable increase resources reliability for dueimplementing to the use ofnew established co-simulation simulation approaches engines in ableUSEM, to build which multi-domain may reduce USEM the modelling platforms. effort Several and modelling increase toolsreliability have due been to published the use toof dateestablished offering simula the capabilitiestion engines to simulate able to onebuild or multi-domain more of the multiple USEM sub-modelsplatforms. Several that an modelling USEM platform tools mayhave incorporate. been publish Ased an to example, date offering EnergyPlus the capabilities simulation to engine simulate [4] isone used or more as the of tool the for multiple the building sub-models stock energythat an demand USEM platform model in may broader incorporate. USEM platforms As an example, such as HUESEnergyPlus [5] and simulation Urban Modelling engine [4] Interface is used as (umi) the t [ool6]. for In fact,the building it has been stock found energy that demand existing model reviews in onbroader urban USEM energy platforms modelling such tend as to HUES focus [5] on theand tools Urban for Modelling the simulation Interface of the (umi) building [6]. In stock fact, energy it has demand,been found e.g., that in [existing7,8]. On reviews the contrary, on urban the presentenergy papermodelling intends tend to to provide focus on researchers the tools withfor the an overviewsimulation of of the the existing building tools stock for allenergy the analysis demand, areas. e.g., in [7,8]. On the contrary, the present paper intendsThe to paper provide is presented researchers as follows.with an Weoverview begin byof offeringthe existing a description tools for all of the our analysis review methodology areas. (SectionThe2 paper). Tools is presented for the simulation as follows. of We each begin of the by fiveoffering sub-models a description of an of USEM our review platform methodology are then reviewed(Section 2). in Tools turn. Toolsfor the for simulati urban meteorologyon of each of analysis the five are sub-models introduced inof Sectionan USEM3. The platform review are of toolsthen forreviewed building in energyturn. Tools systems for urban modelling meteorology is divided analysis in Sections are introduced4 and5, i.e., in tools Section for building3. The review energy of demandtools for andbuilding supply energy analysis, systems respectively. modelling Transportation is divided in energy Sections modelling 4 and 5, is i.e., reviewed tools for in Sectionbuilding6. Toolsenergy for demand energy and optimization supply analysis, modelling respectively. are discussed Transportation in Section 7energy. Conclusions modelling are is presented reviewed inin Section8 .6. Finally, Tools thefor selectionenergy optimization of tools and simulation modelling engines are discussed in this study in Section is also classified 7. Conclusions in different are Tablespresented which in Section indicate 8. the Finally, main the capabilities selection of of each tools tool and concerning simulation topics engines such in asthis the study analyses is also of theclassified environment, in different energy Tables demand, which indicate energy generation,the main capabilities energy distribution, of each tool and concerning optimization topics insuch an urban-scaleas the analyses energy of the system. environment, energy demand, energy generation, energy distribution, and optimization in an urban-scale energy system. 2. Review Methodology The subject area of Urban-Scale Energy Modelling encompasses numerous techniques and application domains. We therefore conducted a dedicated survey of the literature in order to identify Energies 2018, 11, 3269 3 of 24 2. Review Methodology The subject area of Urban-Scale Energy Modelling encompasses numerous techniques and application domains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Technical Implementation and Success Factors for a Global Solar and Wind Atlas Carsten Hoyer-Klick
    The Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy Carsten Hoyer-Klick Folie 1 CEM/IRENA Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy > Carsten Hoyer-Klick > IRENA End User Workshop Jan. 13th 2012, Abu Dhabi Getting Renewable Energy to Work Technology data and learning Available Resources Resource mapping Socio-economic Which and policy data Framework Economic + Political technologies Technical and are feasible? economical Potentials Setting the right the Setting How can RE Technology contribute to the deployment scenarios Best practices energy system? How to get them into the Strategies for market? Where to start? market development Legislation, incentives Political and financial Instruments RE-Markets Slide 2 CEM/IRENA Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy > Carsten Hoyer-Klick > IRENA End User Workshop Jan. 13th 2012, Abu Dhabi Project Development for Renewable Energy Systems Pre feasibility Resources Finding suitable (Atlas) sites with high The Atlas should Feasibility resolution maps few few data no no market Project developmentsupport the first steps and economic Engineering evaluations 1200 in potential assessment, ground 1000 satellite 800 Resources 600 W/m² Detailed 400 policy development200 0 13 14 15 16 17 18 day in march, 2001 (time series) and project pre feasibility, engineering with site Engineering specific data with high Construction temporal resolution as input to Commissioning simulation software data and servicesavailable Operation existing existing commerical market Slide 3 CEM/IRENA Global Atlas for Solar and Wind Energy > Carsten
    [Show full text]
  • The Nexus Solutions Tool (NEST): an Open Platform for Optimizing Multi-Scale Energy-Water-Land System Transformations
    https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-134 Preprint. Discussion started: 15 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. The Nexus Solutions Tool (NEST): An open platform for optimizing multi-scale energy-water-land system transformations Adriano Vinca1,2, Simon Parkinson1,2, Edward Byers1, Peter Burek1, Zarrar Khan3, Volker Krey1,4, Fabio A. Diuana5,1, Yaoping Wang1, Ansir Ilyas6, Alexandre C. Köberle7,5, Iain Staffell8, Stefan Pfenninger9, Abubakr Muhammad6, Andrew Rowe2, Roberto Schaeffer5, Narasimha D. Rao10,1, Yoshihide Wada1,11, Ned Djilali2, and Keywan Riahi1,12 1International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria 2Institute for Integrated Energy Systems, University of Victoria, Canada 3Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, United States 4Dept. of Energy & Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway 5Energy Planning Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 6Center for Water Informatics & Technology, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan 7Grantham Institute, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom 8Centre for Environmental Policy, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom 9 Dept. of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 10School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, United States 11Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 12Institute for Thermal Engineering, TU Graz, Austria Correspondence: Adriano Vinca ([email protected]) Abstract. The energy-water-land nexus represents a critical leverage future policies must draw upon to reduce trade-offs be- tween sustainable development objectives. Yet, existing long-term planning tools do not provide the scope or level of integration across the nexus to unravel important development constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities Overview
    U.S. Department of Energy The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities JUNE 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 DOE’s Motivation and Role .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 The DOE Approach ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Opportunities ............................................................................................................................................. 4 References ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The March 10, 2020 Council Packet May Be Viewed by Going to the Town of Frisco Website
    THE MARCH 10, 2020 COUNCIL PACKET MAY BE VIEWED BY GOING TO THE TOWN OF FRISCO WEBSITE. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FRISCO MARCH 10, 2020 5:00 PM Agenda Item #1: Excavation Code Amendment Discussion Agenda Item #2: Fuel Discussion Agenda Item #3: Remodel Design of Police Department Draft RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FRISCO MARCH 10, 2020 7:00PM STARTING TIMES INDICATED FOR AGENDA ITEMS ARE ESTIMATES ONLY AND MAY CHANGE Call to Order: Gary Wilkinson, Mayor Roll Call: Gary Wilkinson, Jessica Burley, Daniel Fallon, Rick Ihnken, Hunter Mortensen, Deborah Shaner, and Melissa Sherburne Public Comments: Citizens making comments during Public Comments or Public Hearings should state their names and addresses for the record, be topic-specific, and limit comments to no longer than three minutes. NO COUNCIL ACTION IS TAKEN ON PUBLIC COMMENTS. COUNCIL WILL TAKE ALL COMMENTS UNDER ADVISEMENT AND IF A COUNCIL RESPONSE IS APPROPRIATE THE INDIVIDUAL MAKING THE COMMENT WILL RECEIVE A FORMAL RESPONSE FROM THE TOWN AT A LATER DATE. Mayor and Council Comments: Staff Updates: Presentation: Frisco’s Finest Award – Jeff Berino Consent Agenda: • Minutes February 25, 2020 Meeting • Warrant List • Purchasing Cards New Business: Agenda Item #1: First Reading Ordinance 20-03, an Ordinance Amending Chapters 65 and 180 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town of Frisco, Concerning Building Construction and Housing Standards, and the Unified Development Code, Respectively,
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Energy Efficient Computing: a Study of Inexact General Purpose Processors for High-Performance and Big-Data Applications
    Opportunities for Energy Efficient Computing: A Study of Inexact General Purpose Processors for High-Performance and Big-data Applications Peter Düben Jeremy Schlachter AOPP, University of Oxford EPFL Oxford, United Kingdom Lausanne, Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] Parishkrati, Sreelatha Yenugula, John Augustine Christian Enz Indian Institute of Technology Madras EPFL India Lausanne, Switzerland [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] K. Palem T. N. Palmer Electrical Engineering and Computer Science AOPP, University of Oxford Rice University, Houston, USA Oxford, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—In this paper, we demonstrate that disproportionate hardware artifacts such as adders, multiplier or FFT engines gains are possible through a simple devise for injecting inexactness [22], [23], [20], [21]. For additional references on inexact or approximation into the hardware architecture of a computing hardware, architectures and related topics, please also see [1], system with a general purpose template including a complete [32], [12], [39], [35], [2]. More recently, this work has also memory hierarchy. The focus of the study is on energy savings been extended to evaluations of large-scale applications—in possible through this approach in the context of large and challenging applications. We choose two such from different ends of the context of our own group, climate modeling and weather the computing spectrum—the IGCM model for weather and climate prediction served as the driving example in which the floating modeling which embodies significant features of a high-performance point operations were rendered inexact [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Building Performance Analysis Considering Climate Change
    Building performance analysis considering climate change Yiyu Chen1, Karen Kensek1, Joon-Ho Choi1, Marc Schiler1 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA ABSTRACT: Climate change will significantly influence building performance in the future both through differences in energy consumption (perhaps drastically in certain climate zones) and by changing the thermal level of comfort that occupants experience. A building that meets the current energy consumption standard has the potential to become energy inefficient in the future, and well-meaning designers might be applying passive strategies for current conditions without understanding what impact their choices have under different climate change scenarios for their location. By analyzing a case study building’s thermal performance, specifically lifecycle energy use, for multiple climate change scenarios and in different climate zones, it is possible to inspect the resilience of passive design strategies over time. Varying the solar heat gain coefficient (SGHC) was the first strategy tested. To estimate the building’s future performance, three projected future climate conditions were created (for low, moderate, and severe climate change) in three climate zones for three different time periods (2020s, 2050s, and 2080s). The first step was to create new projected weather files. They were calculated from a world climate change weather file generation tool that was developed at the University of Southampton. Then the weather files were used in EnergyPlus to determine the energy consumption. Aggregated multiple runs provided lifecycle energy use for each of the three locations. Then the SHGC values were varied to determine which initial values provided the best long- term result. Although currently only SHGC was tested, this research provides a methodology for architects and engineers during the early stage of design that they can use to avoid the detrimental consequences that might be caused by climate change over the lifecycle of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Air Pollution Exposure Consequences Of" Distributed Electricity Generation
    Energy Development and Technology 005R "Quantifying the Air Pollution Exposure Consequences of" Distributed Electricity Generation Garvin A. Heath, Patrick W. Granvold, Abigail S. Hoats and William W. Nazaroff May 2005 Revised Version: November 2005 This paper is part of the University of California Energy Institute's (UCEI) Energy Policy and Economics Working Paper Series. UCEI is a multi-campus research unit of the University of California located on the Berkeley campus. UC Energy Institute 2547 Channing Way Berkeley, California 94720-5180 www.ucei.org This report was issued in order to disseminate results of and information about energy research at the University of California campuses. Any conclusions or opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Regents of the University of California, the University of California Energy Institute or the sponsors of the research. Readers with further interest in or questions about the subject matter of the report are encouraged to contact the authors directly. QUANTIFYING THE AIR POLLUTION EXPOSURE CONSEQUENCES OF DISTRIBUTED ELECTRICITY GENERATION Final Report Grant No. 07427 Prepared for the University of California Energy Institute Prepared by Garvin A. Heath, Patrick W. Granvold, Abigail S. Hoats and William W Nazaroff Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-1710 Original version: May 2005 Revised version: November 2005 Note Concerning Revision Subsequent to the original version of this report being made publicly available, the authors discovered an error in the model inputs of population density. While none of the qualitative results and conclusions were affected by this error, the absolute value of intake fractions and intake-to-generation ratio were overestimated by a constant factor of 2.59 (representing the conversion from square kilometers to square miles).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Systems Modeling for Twenty-First Century Energy Challenges
    Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges Stefan Pfenninger1,* Adam Hawkes2 James Keirstead1 8 January 2014 (author version of accepted paper) * Corresponding author: [email protected]. 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London 2 Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London Published version: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, pp. 74-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 Abstract Energy systems models are important methods used to generate a range of insight and analysis on the supply and demand of energy. Developed over the second half of the twentieth century, they are now seeing increased relevance in the face of stringent climate policy, energy security and economic development concerns, and increasing challenges due to the changing nature of the twenty-first century energy system. In this paper, we look particularly at models relevant to national and international energy policy, grouping them into four categories: energy systems optimization models, energy systems simulation models, power systems and electricity market models, and qualitative and mixed-methods scenarios. We examine four challenges they face and the efforts being taken to address them: (1) resolving time and space, (2) balancing uncertainty and transparency, (3) addressing the growing complexity of the energy system, and (4) integrating human behavior and social risks and opportunities. In discussing these challenges, we present possible avenues for future research and make recommendations to ensure the continued relevance for energy systems models as important sources of information for policy-making. Keywords: energy systems modeling; energy policy 1 Introduction Hamming (1962) argued that the purpose of computing is insight, not numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy and Efficiency Modeling Analysis Partnership REMI Regional Economic Models Inc
    Technical Report Renewable Energy and Efficiency NREL/TP-6A2-45656 Modeling Analysis Partnership (REMAP): September 2009 An Analysis of How Different Energy Models Addressed a Common High Renewable Energy Penetration Scenario in 2025 Nate Blair, Thomas Jenkin, James Milford, Walter Short, Patrick Sullivan National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Evans, Elliot Lieberman Environmental Protection Agency Gary Goldstein, Evelyn Wright International Resources Group Kamala R. Jayaraman, Boddu Venkatesh ICF International Gary Kleiman Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management Christopher Namovicz, Bob Smith Energy Information Administration Karen Palmer Resources for the Future Ryan Wiser Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Frances Wood OnLocation Technical Report Renewable Energy and Efficiency NREL/TP-6A2-45656 Modeling Analysis Partnership (REMAP): September 2009 An Analysis of How Different Energy Models Addressed a Common High Renewable Energy Penetration Scenario in 2025 Nate Blair, Thomas Jenkin, James Milford, Walter Short, Patrick Sullivan National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Evans, Elliot Lieberman Environmental Protection Agency Gary Goldstein, Evelyn Wright International Resources Group Kamala R. Jayaraman, Boddu Venkatesh ICF International Gary Kleiman Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management Christopher Namovicz, Bob Smith Energy Information Administration Karen Palmer Resources for the Future Ryan Wiser Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Frances Wood OnLocation Prepared under Task No. SAO1.1005 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Building Energy Modeling
    Innovations in Building Energy Modeling Research and Development Opportunities Report for Emerging Technologies November 2020 Innovations in Building Energy Modeling: Research and Development Opportunities Report Disclaimer This work was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, its contractors or subcontractors. ii Innovations in Building Energy Modeling: Research and Development Opportunities Report Acknowledgments Prepared by Amir Roth, Ph.D. Special thanks to the following individuals and groups. Robert Zogg and Emily Cross of Guidehouse (then Navigant Consulting) conducted the interviews, organized the stakeholder workshops, and wrote the first DRAFT BEM Roadmap. Janet Reyna of NREL (then an ORISE Fellow at BTO) provided extensive feedback on the initial DRAFT BEM Roadmap and helped create the organization for the subsequent DRAFT BEM Research and Development Opportunities (RDO) document.
    [Show full text]
  • UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws
    UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws United Nations Environment Programme, Pace University Law School Energy and Climate Center UNEP United Nations Environment Programme i Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UN Environment) September 2016 UNEP Guide for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Laws – English ISBN No: 978-92-807-3609-0 Job No: DEL/2045/NA Reproduction This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational and non profit pur- poses without special permission from the copyright holder, provided that acknowledgement of the source is made. UN Environment Programme will appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this material as a source. No use of this publication can be made for the resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without the prior permission in writing of UN Environment Programme. Application for such permission with a statement of purpose of the reproduction should be addressed to the Communications Division, of the UN Environment Programme, P.O BOX 30552, Nairobi 00100 Kenya. The use of information from this document for publicity of advertising is not permitted. Disclaimer The contents and views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the UN Environment Programme or its member states. The designations employed and the presentation of materials in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environ- ment concerning the legal status of any country, territory or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooling Energy Implications of Occupant Factor in Buildings Under Climate Change
    sustainability Article Cooling Energy Implications of Occupant Factor in Buildings under Climate Change Ji Hyun Lim and Geun Young Yun * ID Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi-do 17104, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-201-3859 Received: 24 October 2017; Accepted: 6 November 2017; Published: 7 November 2017 Abstract: Occupant factor is a critical element in the overall energy consumption of buildings. This study aims to reveal how occupant factors influence the energy consumption of example buildings in Seoul, Tokyo, and Hong Kong under climate change projections, and to prioritize factors with energy saving potential for buildings in consideration of future climate change. The study finds that the cooling degree-hours base of 23.3 ◦C in the three cities sharply increases with future climate change by analyzing future hourly weather data produced herein. Simulations are made with EnergyPlus Runtime Language (Erl) for modeling occupant behavior. The simulation results reveal that a dynamic thermostat control based on an adaptive comfort model is an effective method to reduce cooling energy consumption under future climate change, reducing cooling energy consumption by up to 18% in some instances. In particular, we reveal that a combined application of the adaptive comfort control, nighttime ventilation, and the use of occupancy-based lighting and equipment result in reducing cooling energy consumption by 28%. The outcomes of this study are potentially useful in providing cost-effective solutions to adapt buildings for future climate change with simple modifications to occupant behavior. Also, the roles of renewable energy are briefly discussed.
    [Show full text]