DOCSLIB.ORG

American Revolution: the Indians' War of Independence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Revolution: the Indians' War of Independence American Revolution: The Indians’ War of Independence By Colin G. Calloway, The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, adapted b y Newsela staff on 11.04.16 Word Count 625 TOP: An oil painting titled "Herkimer at the Battle of Oriskany." Courtesy of Wikipedia. MIDDLE: King George III's Proclamation of 1763, (Gilder Lehrman Collection). BOTTOM: Map of Iroquois Six Nations. Photo: Courtesy of Wikipedia. The Declaration of Independence is one of the country's most important documents. It announced that the United States was its own nation. It also describes the part American Indians played in the American Revolution against Britain. The American Revolution was a war that took place from 1765 to 1783. The Americans fought to be free from British rule. The Declaration of Independence says Indians were on the wrong side of the fight for liberty. While the Americans fought for their rights and freedoms, the Native Americans fought against them alongside the British. This was the view of the nation's founding fathers, including Thomas Jefferson. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 1 Indians fought for independence, too In the late 1700s, most Indians did not want to take a side in the American Revolution. However, most of them eventually sided with the British. For the Indians, the Americans were more dangerous to their land and their way of life than the British. The American War of Independence was an Indian war for independence as well. By the early 1760s, the British declared that the Appalachian Mountains would divide British settlement from Indian land. This started a chain of events that led to a revolution and independence. Tribes were forced to choose sides When the Revolution broke out, Indian people knew their land was at stake. The British and the Americans competed for the support of the Indian tribes. Most tribes did not want to side with either the British or the Americans. This ended up not being possible for the Indians, though. One example is the Delaware Indian tribe. At first, the tribe did not want to support the British. In fact, the Delaware chief, White Eyes, led his people in making the Treaty of Fort Pitt in 1778. This was the first Indian treaty made by the new nation. The Delaware Indians and the Americans agreed to be on the same side. But American soldiers killed White Eyes, so the tribe instead joined sides with the British soldiers. Agreement to end war didn't include tribes In the East, the fighting between the British and the Americans ended in 1781, when the British surrendered to Washington's army. By April 1783, Britain recognized the independence of the United States at the Peace of Paris. This agreement gave British land to the United States. There were no American Indians at the Peace of Paris and Indians were not mentioned in its terms. The tribes were furious when they learned that the British had given away their lands. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 2 Americans justified attacks on tribal land, culture Although the founding fathers struggled with how to deal honorably with Indian people, taking Indian land was never in doubt. After the long war against Britain, the United States government had no money. Its only wealth was the land the British had given them at the Peace of Paris. This was Indian land. The government needed to sell the land to American settlers to raise money for the country's future. How could the Americans claim to deal honorably with Indian peoples at the same time as they built their nation on Indian land? The Declaration of Independence provided some justifications. It said that Indians had fought against American rights and freedoms, so they could not expect to share those rights and freedoms. The United States must and would take the Indians’ land. In return, the government would give these "savages" civilization, and that was honorable enough. For Native Americans, this was an attack on their lands and way of life. They fought back as well as they could. Meanwhile, they tried to preserve what they could of Indian life in a nation that was trying to destroy it. Colin G. Calloway is a professor of history at Dartmouth College. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 3 Quiz 1 Which sentence from the article is MOST important to include in its summary? (A) The Declaration of Independence is one of the country's most important documents. (B) The American Revolution was a war that took place from 1765 to 1783. (C) The Declaration of Independence says Indians were on the wrong side of the fight for liberty. (D) In fact, the Delaware chief, White Eyes, led his people in making the Treaty of Fort Pitt in 1778. 2 Which detail BEST reflects the Native Americans' difficulty in choosing between the British and Americans? (A) After the Revolutionary War, the United States needed money so it sold Native American land. (B) In 1783, the British recognized the United States as a country at the Peace of Paris, which did not include or mention Native Americans. (C) The Delaware Indian Tribe wanted to support the Americans, but after the Americans killed their leader they supported the British. (D) The Declaration of Independence said that Indians had fought against Americans, so they could not receive rights and freedoms. 3 What was the relationship between Native Americans and the British? (A) Native Americans always supported the British against the Americans because the British respected their rights. (B) Many Native Americans supported the British because they were more threatened by the Americans. (C) Many Native Americans opposed the British because the British did not include them at the Peace of Paris. (D) Native Americans always opposed the British because they gave away their land to the Americans in 1783. 4 What effect did the Peace of Paris have on the United States? (A) It gave the United States a great deal of British money. (B) It gave the United States British land in North America. (C) It recommended that the United States sell Indian land to settlers. (D) It caused the United States to compete for support from Native Americans. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 4 This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 5 Answer Key 1 Which sentence from the article is MOST important to include in its summary? (A) The Declaration of Independence is one of the country's most important documents. (B) The American Revolution was a war that took place from 1765 to 1783. (C) The Declaration of Independence says Indians were on the wrong side of the fight for liberty. (D) In fact, the Delaware chief, White Eyes, led his people in making the Treaty of Fort Pitt in 1778. 2 Which detail BEST reflects the Native Americans' difficulty in choosing between the British and Americans? (A) After the Revolutionary War, the United States needed money so it sold Native American land. (B) In 1783, the British recognized the United States as a country at the Peace of Paris, which did not include or mention Native Americans. (C) The Delaware Indian Tribe wanted to support the Americans, but after the Americans killed their leader they supported the British. (D) The Declaration of Independence said that Indians had fought against Americans, so they could not receive rights and freedoms. 3 What was the relationship between Native Americans and the British? (A) Native Americans always supported the British against the Americans because the British respected their rights. (B) Many Native Americans supported the British because they were more threatened by the Americans. (C) Many Native Americans opposed the British because the British did not include them at the Peace of Paris. (D) Native Americans always opposed the British because they gave away their land to the Americans in 1783. 4 What effect did the Peace of Paris have on the United States? (A) It gave the United States a great deal of British money. (B) It gave the United States British land in North America. (C) It recommended that the United States sell Indian land to settlers. (D) It caused the United States to compete for support from Native Americans. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 6 This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named 'American Revolution Museum at Yorktown'
    DISPATCH A Newsletter of the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation • Spring 2012 Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named ‘American Revolution Museum at Yorktown’ Along with a physical transforma- bonds, is estimated at $46 tion of the Yorktown Victory Center will million. Private donations come a new name – “American Revolu- to the Jamestown-Yorktown tion Museum at Yorktown” – adopted Foundation, Inc., will sup- May 10 by the Jamestown-Yorktown port elements of gallery Foundation Board of Trustees and and outdoor exhibits and endorsed by the Jamestown-Yorktown educational resources. Foundation, Inc., Board of Directors. “The new name high- Recommended by a board naming lights the core offering of study task force, the new name will the museum, American be implemented upon completion of Revolution history,” said the museum replacement, and in the Frank B. Atkinson, who meantime the Yorktown Victory Center chaired the naming study will continue in operation as a museum task force comprised of 11 The distinctive two-story main entrance of the American of the American Revolution. members of the Jamestown- Revolution Museum at Yorktown will serve as a focal point Construction is expected to start Yorktown Foundation for arriving visitors. in the second half of 2012 on the proj- and Jamestown-Yorktown name were identified, and research ect, which includes an 80,000-square- Foundation, Inc., boards, “and the in- was undertaken on names currently in foot structure that will encompass ex- clusion of the word ‘Yorktown’ provides use. Selected names were tested with panded exhibition galleries, classrooms a geographical anchor. We arrived Yorktown Victory Center visitors and and support functions, and reorganiza- at this choice through a methodical reviewed by a trademark attorney and tion of the 22-acre site.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – the Enlightenment and the American Revolution I. Philosophy in the Age of Reason (5-1) A
    Chapter 5 – The Enlightenment and the American Revolution I. Philosophy in the Age of Reason (5-1) A. Scientific Revolution Sparks the Enlightenment 1. Natural Law: Rules or discoveries made by reason B. Hobbes and Lock Have Conflicting Views 1. Hobbes Believes in Powerful Government a. Thomas Hobbes distrusts humans (cruel-greedy-selfish) and favors strong government to keep order b. Promotes social contract—gaining order by giving up freedoms to government c. Outlined his ideas in his work called Leviathan (1651) 2. Locke Advocates Natural Rights a. Philosopher John Locke believed people were good and had natural rights—right to life, liberty, and property b. In his Two Treatises of Government, Lock argued that government’s obligation is to protect people’s natural rights and not take advantage of their position in power C. The Philosophes 1. Philosophes: enlightenment thinkers that believed that the use of reason could lead to reforms of government, law, and society 2. Montesquieu Advances the Idea of Separation of Powers a. Montesquieu—had sharp criticism of absolute monarchy and admired Britain for dividing the government into three branches b. The Spirit of the Laws—outlined his belief in the separation of powers (legislative, executive, and judicial branches) to check each other to stop one branch from gaining too much power 3. Voltaire Defends Freedom of Thought a. Voltaire—most famous of the philosophe who published many works arguing for tolerance and reason—believed in the freedom of religions and speech b. He spoke out against the French government and Catholic Church— makes powerful enemies and is imprisoned twice for his views 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of the American Revolution
    Page 50 Chapter 12 By What Right Thomas Hobbes John Locke n their struggle for freedom, the colonists raised some age-old questions: By what right does government rule? When may men break the law? I "Obedience to government," a Tory minister told his congregation, "is every man's duty." But the Reverend Jonathan Boucher was forced to preach his sermon with loaded pistols lying across his pulpit, and he fled to England in September 1775. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that when people are governed "under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a Government." Both Boucher and Jefferson spoke to the question of whether citizens owe obedience to government. In an age when kings held near absolute power, people were told that their kings ruled by divine right. Disobedience to the king was therefore disobedience to God. During the seventeenth century, however, the English beheaded one King (King Charles I in 1649) and drove another (King James II in 1688) out of England. Philosophers quickly developed theories of government other than the divine right of kings to justify these actions. In order to understand the sources of society's authority, philosophers tried to imagine what people were like before they were restrained by government, rules, or law. This theoretical condition was called the state of nature. In his portrait of the natural state, Jonathan Boucher adopted the opinions of a well- known English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that humankind was basically evil and that the state of nature was therefore one of perpetual war and conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War and Revolution
    SungraphoThema VELS levels 1-3 Civil War and Revolution What can the study of civil war bring to our understanding of revolutions? Professor David Armitage, Harvard University The study of civil war has recently become academic Civil war has gradually become the most widespread, big business, especially among political scientists the most destructive, and now the most characteristic and economists. A surge of intellectual interest in form of organised human violence. Since 1820, an a major problem like this often has two sources: average of two to four per cent of all countries have the internal dynamics of academic disciplines experienced civil war at any given moment. This themselves, and external currents in the wider world striking average disguises the fact that some periods that scholars hope their findings might shape. The were even more acutely afflicted by internal warfare: ongoing ‘boom in the study of civil war,’ as it has for example, the middle decades of the nineteenth been called, has both these motives. Economists who century, the period of the US Civil War, the Taiping study underdevelopment, especially in Africa, have Rebellion and the Indian Mutiny, among other internal isolated civil war as one of its main causes. Students conflicts.2 The decades since 1975 have seen a similar of international relations who focused their attention spike in the incidence of internal warfare. Indeed, in on wars between states have turned to the study of the last thirty years, an average of at least ten per cent civil wars as they found their traditional subject of all countries at any one time have been suffering disappearing before their very eyes: since World War civil war: in 2006 (the last year for which complete II, the developed world has enjoyed a ‘Long Peace’ data are available), there were thirty-two civil wars in without interstate war, while between 1989 and 2006, progress around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • From the American Revolution Through the American Civil War"
    History 216-01: "From the American Revolution through the American Civil War" J.P. Whittenburg Fall 2009 Email: [email protected] Office: Young House (205 Griffin Avenue) Web Page: http://faculty.wm.edu/jpwhit Telephone: 757-221-7654 Office Hours: By Appointment Clearly, this isn't your typical class. For one thing, we meet all day on Fridays. For another, we will spend most of our class time "on-site" at museums, battlefields, or historic buildings. This class will concentrate on the period from the end of the American Revolution through the end of the American Civil War, but it is not at all a narrative that follows a neat timeline. I’ll make no attempt to touch on every important theme and we’ll depart from the chronological approach whenever targets of opportunities present themselves. I'll begin most classes with some sort of short background session—a clip from a movie, oral reports, or maybe something from the Internet. As soon as possible, though, we'll be into a van and on the road. Now, travel time can be tricky and I do hate to rush students when we are on-site. I'll shoot for getting people back in time for a reasonably early dinner—say 5:00. BUT there will be times when we'll get back later than that. There will also be one OPTIONAL overnight trip—to the Harper’s Ferry and the Civil War battlefields at Antietam and Gettysburg. If these admitted eccentricities are deeply troubling, I'd recommend dropping the course. No harm, no foul—and no hard feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Faulkner Murals: Depicting the Creation of a Nation
    DEPICTING the CREATION of a NATION The Story Behind the Murals About Our Founding Documents by LESTER S. GORELIC wo large oil-on-canvas murals (each about 14 feet by 37.5 feet) decorate the walls of the Rotunda of the National T Archives in Washington, D.C. The murals depict pivotal moments in American history represented by two founding doc­ uments: the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. In one mural, Thomas Jefferson of Virginia is depicted handing over his careful­ ly worded and carefully edited draft of the Declaration of Independence to John Hancock of Massachusetts. Many of the other Founding Fathers look on, some fully supportive, some apprehensive. In the other, James Madison of Virginia is depicted presenting his draft of the Constitution to fellow Virginian George Washington, president of the 1787 Constitutional Convention, and to other members of the Convention. Although these moments occurred in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia (Independence Hall)—not in the sylvan settings shown in the murals—the two price­ less documents are now in the National Archives Building in Washington, D.C., and have been seen by millions of visitors over the years. When the National Archives Building was built in the Jefferson’s placement at the front of the Committee of mid-1930s, however, these two founding documents were Five reflects his position as its head. Although Jefferson was in the custody of the Library of Congress and would not the primary author of the Declaration, his initial draft was be transferred to the Archives until 1952. Even so, the ar­ edited first by Adams and then by Franklin.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson and the Beginning of the American Revolution
    Jefferson and the beginning of the American Revolution Reading Level: Middle School From 1775 to 1783, American Patriots fought the British in the American Revolution. Thomas Jefferson never fought as a soldier. However, throughout the war, he used words and deeds to further the cause of independence. He was a delegate in the Virginia House of Delegates and the Second Continental Congress, governor of Virginia, author of the Declaration of Independence, and a spokesman for liberty. Background to the American Revolution When the war between France and England ended in 1763, Great Britain had won. At the time George III was king of Great Britain. He and his ministers (persons in charge of government departments) wanted to keep strict control over their colonies in America. By 1775, the thirteen colonies had a population of more than 2,700,000. Most people lived on This map by Carington small farms and exported agricultural products to England. They Bowles shows the imported manufactured goods such as cloth, hats and tools from boundaries of the American England. Each colony had its own governor and assembly. colonies in 1763 following The war had been expensive. The British Parliament placed new taxes the French and Indian Wars. on the colonies to help pay off the debts. The 1764 Sugar Act and 1767 Townshend Act placed taxes and duties (fees) on imported goods. Colonists refused to pay the taxes. They stated that since they had no representation in parliament, they had not voted for the taxes. However, even worse, Parliament passed the Quartering Act. This act said that British soldiers could be housed in any empty, public building.
    [Show full text]
  • Two European Influences on the American Revolution: Puritanism and John Locke
    DePaul Law Review Volume 25 Issue 4 Summer 1976 Article 2 Two European Influences on the American Revolution: Puritanism and John Locke L. Edward Allemand Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation L. E. Allemand, Two European Influences on the American Revolution: Puritanism and John Locke , 25 DePaul L. Rev. 805 (1976) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol25/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWO EUROPEAN INFLUENCES ON THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: PURITANISM AND JOHN LOCKE L. Edward Allemand* By suggesting the relationships which unify the American Revolutionary Period with the continuum of European philo- sophical, political, and religious thought, Professor Allemand has chosen a topic which "necessarily relates to the fields of law and jurisprudence." By limiting the scope of the Article to a discussion of Puritanism and the Enlightenment as represented by John Locke, the author has preserved for his readers a famil- iar background from which to relate his observations to the members of the legal community. In publishing this Article the Board of Editors salutes not only the Bicentennialof the Repub- lic, but also the scholarship of the DePaul University Depart- ment of Philosophy. INTRODUCTION The American Revolutionary Period represents an unusual moment in the history of Western culture. It remains a mystery how a small number of men and women were able to bring about a political change which was neither quite understood nor enthusiastically endorsed by the public at large.' Nevertheless, the change was a fait accompli, and it has stood as a 200 year old chapter in the search for liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Road to Revolution
    Road to Revolution 1760-1775 In 1607 The Virginia Company of London, an English trading company, planted the first permanent English settlement in North America at Jamestown. The successful establishment of this colony was no small achievement as the English had attempted to plant a colony in North America since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I in the l6th century. The Virginia Company operated under a royal charter, granted by King James I, which assured the original settlers they would have all liberties, franchises and immunities as if they had been “abiding and born within England.” By 1760, England and Scotland had united into the Kingdom of Great Britain and her settlements in North America had grown to thirteen thriving colonies with strong cultural, economic, and political ties to the mother country. Each colony enjoyed a certain amount of self- government. The ties which bound Great Britain and her American colonies were numerous. Wealthy men in the colonies, such as George Washington, used British trading companies as their agents to conduct business. Young men from prominent families, like Arthur Lee, went to Great Britain to finish their schooling. Colonial churches benefited from ministers who were educated in Great Britain. Many of the brightest men in the colonies, such as Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, James Otis of Massachusetts, and Peyton Randolph of Virginia, served the British government as appointed officials. What then caused these strong ties to unravel after 1760? What caused the American colonists to revolt against their mother country in 1775? Though not recognized by most people at the time, economic and political forces beginning in 1760 on both sides of the Atlantic would force Great Britain and her American colonies to reassess their long relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • American Revolution: Selections from Secondary School History Books of Other Nations
    DOCUMENT RESUBE zD 124 490 95 SO 009 240 AUTHOR Barendsen, Robert D., Comp.; And Others TITLE American Revolution: Selections from Secondary School History Books of Other Nations. INSTITUTION Office of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO (0E)76-19124 PUB DATE 76 NOTE 97p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock No. 017-080-01550-1, $2.25) EDES PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$4.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Colonial History (United States); Colonialism; *Comparative Analysis; Comparative Education; *Foreign Countries; Foreign Relations; Geography; *History Textbooks; International Education; Political Science; Religion; Revolution; *Revolutionary War (United States); Secondary Education; Social Studies; Textbook Bias; *Textbook Content; United States History ABSTRACT Selections from the recent history texts of 13 foreign countries are contained in this documentas an effort to gather the curricular perceptions of other countries about key events or periods in American history related to the U.S. Revolutionary War. American- -secon a ry Lea lier Ni, cottemporary source material not otherwise readily available for teaching about the American Revolution, especially during the period of the bicentennial celebration. The collection is useful to teachers interested in inquiry learning, a comparative approach to history,or international understanding. Each entry represents the treatment of the subject in the textbooks of-the country. Selectionsare from France, West Germany, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, Ghana, Egypt, Israel, Japan, People's Republic of China, India, Great Britan, and the U.S.S.R. Each selection is translated into English and id-atifies source and grade level it is written for. Compilers' interpretations of the selection are limited and factual errors are not corrected.
    [Show full text]
  • John Locke and the Declaration of Independence
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 15 Issue 1 Mental Injury Damages Symposium Article 19 1966 John Locke and the Declaration of Independence Kenneth D. Stern Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Legal History Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Kenneth D. Stern, John Locke and the Declaration of Independence, 15 Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 186 (1966) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John Locke and the Declarationof Independence Kenneth D. Stern* 1 N AN ARTICLE published in the Journal of the American Bar Association in 1949, Dean Clarence Manion, then Dean of the College of Law of the University of Notre Dame, stated, "It is misleading to attribute the philosophy of the Declaration (of of John Locke." In support of his Independence) to the writings 2 contention, he quoted Locke's Second Treatise of Government, wherein Locke, in Section 95, states that once men enter into a community or government for the serving of their mutual interests, "the majority have the right to conclude the rest." Dean Manion feels that Locke thereby implies that the rights of minority groups and even of individuals are thus subordinated to the dictates of the majority. Dean Manion then quoted a letter written by Jefferson to Francis W. Gilmer on June 7, 1816, in which Jefferson said: Our legislators are not sufficiently apprised .
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Things You Didn't Know About the 13 Colonies by Liana Mahoney
    Name : 13 Things You Didn't Know About the 13 Colonies by Liana Mahoney You probably already know the story of Maine (part of America's thirteen colonies. It's a story of perseverance, Massachusetts) New Hampshire danger, adventure, and luck. It is the story of Virginia, Massachusetts New York Rhode Island Connecticut Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania New Jersey Delaware Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, North Carolina, Maryland Virginia New Jersey, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. North Carolina South Carolina At !rst, these colonies followed the rules and laws of Georgia Atlantic Ocean England, but it wasn't long before they decided they wanted to govern themselves. As a result, in 1776, it became the story of the birth of a nation, when these original thirteen colonies fought for their independence and became the United States of America. What else is there to know? Here are thirteen lesser-known facts that you may not have known about the thirteen colonies. 1. There was a lost colony. In 1585, Sir Walter Raleigh began the !rst English settlement in North America on Roanoke Island, just o" the coast of what we now know as North Carolina. Living conditions here were so harsh that the colonists had no choice but to return to England just a year later. In 1587, Raleigh sent a second group of colonists, led by a man named John White. White left his family temporarily to sail back to England for more supplies. When he returned two years later, the colony had vanished! Everyone was gone. Carved into the bark of a tree was a single word: Croatoan.
    [Show full text]