DOCSLIB.ORG

Budget Justification Bureau of Land Management FY2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Budget Justification Bureau of Land Management FY2022 The United States BUDGET Department of the Interior JUSTIFICATIONS and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2022 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NOTICE: These budget justifications are prepared for the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittees. Approval for release of the justifications prior to their printing in the public record of the Subcommittee hearings may be obtained through the Office of Budget of the Department of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper Bureau of Land Management 2022 Budget Justifications TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ I-1 II. Crosscutting Programs .................................................................................................................. II-1 III. Budget at a Glance ....................................................................................................................... III-1 IV. Collections .................................................................................................................................... IV-1 V. Management of Lands and Resources ......................................................................................... V-1 Appropriations Language ................................................................................................................ V-1 Appropriations Language Citations ................................................................................................. V-1 Authorizations .................................................................................................................................. V-3 Summary of Requirements ............................................................................................................ V-29 Justification of Fixed Costs and Internal Realignments................................................................. V-31 Activity: Land Resources ............................................................................................................... V-33 Subactivity: Rangeland Management ............................................................................... V-34 Subactivity: Public Domain Forest Management ............................................................. V-38 Subactivity: Cultural Resources Management .................................................................. V-41 Subactivity: Wild Horse & Burro Management ............................................................... V-44 Activity: Wildlife and Aquatic Habitat Management .................................................................... V-49 Subactivity: Aquatic Habitat Management ....................................................................... V-50 Subactivity: Wildlife Habitat Management ...................................................................... V-54 Activity: Recreation Management ................................................................................................. V-59 Subactivity: Wilderness Management .............................................................................. V-60 Subactivity: Recreation Resources Management .............................................................. V-63 Activity: Energy and Minerals Management ................................................................................. V-67 Subactivity: Oil and Gas Management ............................................................................. V-69 Subactivity: Coal Management ......................................................................................... V-76 Subactivity: Other Mineral Resources .............................................................................. V-79 Subactivity: Renewable Energy Management .................................................................. V-82 Activity: Realty and Ownership Management ............................................................................... V-85 Subactivity: Alaska Conveyance and Lands ..................................................................... V-86 Subactivity: Cadastral, Lands & Realty Management ...................................................... V-88 Activity: Communication Site Management ................................................................................. V-92 Activity: Resource Protection and Maintenance ............................................................................ V-94 Subactivity: Resource Management Planning .................................................................. V-95 Subactivity: Resource Protection and Law Enforcement ................................................. V-98 Subactivity: Abandoned Mine Lands & Hazardous Materials Management.................. V-100 Activity: Transportation and Facilities Maintenance ................................................................... V-103 Subactivity: Annual Maintenance & Operational Costs ................................................. V-104 Subactivity: Deferred Maintenance & Capital Improvements ........................................ V-106 Activity: National Conservation Lands ....................................................................................... V-111 Subactivity: Nat'l Monuments & Nat'l Conservation Areas ........................................... V-111 Activity: Workforce and Organizational Support ........................................................................ V-114 Subactivity: Administrative Support .............................................................................. V-117 Subactivity: Bureauwide Fixed Costs ............................................................................. V-119 Table of Contents Page-ii Bureau of Land Management 2022 Budget Justifications Subactivity: Information Technology Management ....................................................... V-121 Activity: Mining Law Administration ......................................................................................... V-123 VI. Land Acquisition .......................................................................................................................... VI-1 Appropriations Language ............................................................................................................... VI-1 Appropriations Language Citations and Authorizations ................................................................. VI-1 Summary of Requirements ............................................................................................................. VI-3 Activity: Land Acquisition ............................................................................................................. VI-5 Subactivity: Land Acquisition ........................................................................................... VI-7 Subactivity: Recreational Access ....................................................................................... VI-9 Subactivity: Emergencies, Hardships, and Inholdings .................................................... VI-10 Subactivity: Acquisition Management ............................................................................. VI-11 VII. Oregon and California Grant Lands ........................................................................................ VII-1 Appropriations Language ............................................................................................................. VII-1 Appropriations Language Citations and Authorization ................................................................ VII-2 Summary of Requirements ........................................................................................................... VII-6 Justification of Fixed Costs and Internal Realignments................................................................ VII-7 Appropriation Description ............................................................................................................ VII-8 Activity: Western Oregon Acquisition ....................................................................................... VII-16 Activity: Western Oregon Transportation and Facilities Maintenance....................................... VII-17 Subactivity: Annual Maintenance & Operations………………………………….......VII-17 Activity: Western Oregon Resources Management .................................................................... VII-19 Activity: Western Oregon Information and Data Systems ......................................................... VII-24 Activity: Western Oregon National Conservation Lands ........................................................... VII-25 VIII. Range Improvements ................................................................................................................ VIII-1 Appropriations Language ............................................................................................................ VIII-1 Appropriations Language Citations and Authorizations .............................................................. VIII-2 Summary of Requirements .......................................................................................................... VIII-4 Activity: Range Improvements .................................................................................................... VIII-5 IX. Service Charges, Deposits, and Forfeitures ............................................................................... IX-1 Appropriations Language ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—House H1808
    H1808 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE April 12, 1999 RESIGNATION AS MEMBER OF into our most serious secret weapons Foreign assistance used under the COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS programs, is described as almost total. microcredit program is loaned and paid The SPEAKER laid before the House Mr. Speaker, nuclear warhead tech- back with interest and is recycled and the following resignation as a member nology might be hard for most to con- used for new loans, thus reaching an ceive, but the fact that China could of the Committee on Small Business: even greater percentage of the world's conceivably have the power to kill as poor. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, many as seven million Americans with HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Microcredit is empowerment. It is a Washington, DC, March 25, 1999. one missile is something that I think tool which builds upon the human spir- Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, everyone can visualize. it. It is the U.S. helping others to help Speaker, House of Representatives, This Chinese espionage has gone on themselves. Microcredit is action in Washington, DC. far too long. I urge the Security Coun- support of our humanitarian instincts DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Last week I was ap- cil to release the Cox report because and objectives. pointed to the Committee on Government this administration needs to stand up I support this program, and when the Reform. As a result of this appointment, I and take responsibility for release of bill comes to the floor, H.R. 1143, I ask hereby resign as a member of the Committee this Top Secret technology, and the that my colleagues give their strong on Small Business.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1711-E AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Tom Fry (Acting) Director, Bureau of Land Management on H.R
    STATEMENT OF TOM FRY (ACTING) DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ON H.R. 15 OTAY MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS ACT OF 1999 BEFORE THE HOUSE RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDS February 4, 1999 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to testify on H.R. 15, the Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of 1999. I want to commend the bill's sponsor, Congressman Brian Bilbray (R-CA) for introducing this legislation which recognizes the unique nature of the area by protecting its many outstanding and precious natural resources for generations to come. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) strongly supports H.R. 15. We also recognize and appreciate the Subcommittee's work last Congress which amended H.R. 3950, the Otay Mountain Wilderness bill, also introduced by Mr. Bilbray. Our only objection to H.R. 3950 was the Section 6(b) language on Border Enforcement, Drug Interdiction, and Wildland Fire Protection. The amended Section 6(b) language, which appears in H.R. 15, was requested by the Administration and is in keeping with the mandate and intent of the 1964 Wilderness Act. We thank Congressman Bilbray and the Subcommittee Members for addressing our unusual and important access needs in the area. I also want to comment briefly on Secretary Babbitt's recent tour of Otay Mountain. While there, the Secretary met with many individuals and local officials committed to preserving the special resources of this area. He was very impressed, encouraged, persuaded and enlightened by the diverse group he traveled with including Representative Bob Filner, San Diego County representatives, the staffs to Senators Feinstein and Boxer, staff to Congressman Brian Bilbray, the San Diego Association of Governments, the California Biodiversity Council, the Sierra Club, the Endangered Habitat League, The Wilderness Society, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Meals: Animals, Nature, and the Myth of Consent A
    HAPPY MEALS: ANIMALS, NATURE, AND THE MYTH OF CONSENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MODERN THOUGHT AND LITERATURE AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Vasile Stanescu May 2014 © 2014 by Vasile Stanescu. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/ph312vx3092 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Shelley Fishkin, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ursula Heise, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Matthew Kohrman Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii iv Abstract In describing man as an “animal rationale,” Aristotle argued for a “myth of consent,” i.e. that slaves, barbarians, women, and animals have all “agreed” to be owned and controlled by Greek male citizens for their own “protection.” Therefore, there are two main themes in Aristotelian thought in the original definition of man, which became inscribed in later thinkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for the Study of Literature and Environment Ninth Biennial
    Association for the Study of Literature and Environment Ninth Biennial Conference Welcome to Bloomington! On behalf of Indiana University, I am pleased to welcome you to the Association for the Study of Literature and the Environment 2011 Conference. This important event brings together artists, teachers, writers, and scholars from around the world who share a deep interest in the environment, its meanings, representations, and interpretations in language and culture. It is a special pleasure for Indiana University to host this conference on our Bloomington campus because of our longstanding commitment to issues concerning the environment. That commitment dates back at least to our legendary 11th President Herman B Wells, who fiercely protected the beautiful green spaces on campus. This tradition contin- ues in the university’s careful stewardship of our campus’s natural resources and our firm commitment to the outstanding scholarship that will help us understand and appreciate our changing environment. Michael McRobbie President, Indiana University Thanks Many thanks to our hosts at Indiana University, especially: Michael A. McRobbie, President of Indiana University Karen Hanson, Provost of Indiana University Bloomington and Executive Vice President, Indiana University David Zaret, Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington Jean Robinson, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Steve Watt, Associate Dean of Arts and Sciences Jonathan Elmer, Chair, Department of English Scott Sanders, Distinguished
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900
    *DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT PERMISSION* “The Inalienable Rights of the Beasts”1: Organized Animal Protection and the Language of Rights in America, 1865-1900 Susan J. Pearson Assistant Professor, Department of History Northwestern University Telephone: 847-471-3744 1881 Sheridan Road Email: [email protected] Evanston, IL 60208 ABSTRACT Contemporary animal rights activists and legal scholars routinely charge that state animal protection statutes were enacted, not to serve the interests of animals, but rather to serve the interests of human beings in preventing immoral behavior. In this telling, laws preventing cruelty to animals are neither based on, nor do they establish, anything like rights for animals. Their raison d’etre, rather, is social control of human actions, and their function is to efficiently regulate the use of property in animals. The (critical) contemporary interpretation of the intent and function of animal cruelty laws is based on the accretion of actions – on court cases and current enforcement norms. This approach confuses the application and function of anticruelty laws with their intent and obscures the connections between the historical animal welfare movement and contemporary animal rights activism. By returning to the context in which most state anticruelty statutes were enacted – in the nineteenth century – and by considering the discourse of those activists who promoted the original legislation, my research reveals a more complicated story. Far from being concerned only with controlling the behavior of deviants, the nineteenth-century animal welfare activists who agitated for such laws situated them within a “lay discourse” of rights, borrowed from the successful abolitionist movement, that connected animal sentience, proved through portrayals of their suffering, to animal rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114Th Congress
    Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114th Congress Katie Hoover Analyst in Natural Resources Policy Kristina Alexander Legislative Attorney Sandra L. Johnson Information Research Specialist January 12, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41610 Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114th Congress Summary The Wilderness Act of 1964 established the National Wilderness Preservation System and directed that only Congress can designate federal lands as part of the system. Free-standing bills to designate wilderness areas are typically introduced and considered in each Congress; such bills are not amendments to the Wilderness Act, but typically refer to the act for management guidance and sometimes include special provisions. Numerous wilderness bills were introduced in the 112th Congress, but it was the first Congress since 1966 that did not add to the wilderness system. The only wilderness law that was enacted in the 112th Congress reduced the size of a wilderness area. At the end of the 113th Congress, multiple wilderness designations and expansions were included in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2015 (NDAA) (P.L. 113-291, §§3060-3062, 3064-3066). The NDAA expanded or created wilderness in five states: Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Washington. Wilderness designation can be controversial. The designation generally prohibits commercial activities, motorized access, and human infrastructure from wilderness areas; however, there are several exceptions to this general rule. Advocates propose wilderness designations to preserve the generally undeveloped conditions of the areas. Opponents see such designations as preventing certain uses and potential economic development in rural areas where such opportunities are relatively limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations
    Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations For reader convenience, all wilderness evaluation documents are compiled here, including duplicate sections that are also found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D Inventoried Roadless Areas. Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas Proposed Wilderness by and Wilderness Evaluations Alternative Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Roadless areas refer to substantially natural landscapes without constructed and maintained roads. Some improvements and past activities are acceptable within roadless areas. Inventoried roadless areas are identified in a set of maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Volume 2, November 2000. These areas may contain important environmental values that warrant protection and are, as a general rule, managed to preserve their roadless characteristics. In the past, roadless areas were evaluated as potential additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Roadless areas have maintained their ecological and social values, and are important both locally and nationally. Recognition of the values of roadless areas is increasing as our population continues to grow and demand for outdoor recreation and other uses of the Forests rises. These unroaded and undeveloped areas provide the Forests with opportunities for potential wilderness, as well as non-motorized recreation, commodities and amenities. The original Forest Plans evaluated Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) data from the mid- 1980s and recommended wilderness designation for some areas. Most areas were left in a roadless, non- motorized use status. This revision of Forest Plans analyzes a new and more complete land inventory of inventoried roadless areas as well as other areas identified by the public during scoping.
    [Show full text]
  • HLPE Report # 12
    HLPE REPORT 12 Nutrition and food systems A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition September 2017 HLPE High Level Panel of Experts HLPE Reports series #1 Price volatility and food security (2011) #2 Land tenure and international investments in agriculture (2011) #3 Food security and climate change (2012) #4 Social protection for food security (2012) #5 Biofuels and food security (2013) #6 Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security (2013) #7 Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition (2014) #8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems (2014) #9 Water for food security and nutrition (2015) #10 Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? (2016) #11 Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition (2017) #12 Nutrition and food systems (2017) All HLPE reports are available at www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe 2 HLPE Steering Committee members (September 2017) Patrick Caron (Chair) Carol Kalafatic (Vice-Chair) Amadou Allahoury Louise Fresco Eileen Kennedy Muhammad Azeem Khan Bernardo Kliksberg Fangquan Mei Sophia Murphy Mohammad Saeid Noori Naeini Michel Pimbert Juan Ángel Rivera Dommarco Magdalena Sepúlveda Martin Yemefack Rami Zurayk HLPE Project Team members Jessica Fanzo (Team Leader) Mandana Arabi Barbara Burlingame Lawrence Haddad Simon Kimenju Gregory Miller Fengying Nie Elisabetta Recine Lluís Serra-Majem Dipa Sinha Coordinator of the HLPE Nathanaël Pingault This report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE) has been approved by the HLPE Steering Committee. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Committee on World Food Security, of its members, participants, or of the Secretariat.
    [Show full text]