DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource Name (Heading 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource Name (Heading 1) Forest Plan Amendments for Motorized Access Management within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones Kootenai, Lolo, and Idaho Panhandle National Forests (Montana and Idaho) Summary of Public Comments Received on Draft Supplemental EIS November 2011 Forest Service Enterprise Unit 1602 Ontario St. Sandpoint, ID 83864 208-265-6621 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Summary of Public Comments on the DSEIS for Motorized Access Management Within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recover Zones Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Content Analysis Process ................................................................................................................ 2 List of Commenters ......................................................................................................................... 2 Public Concern Statements (PCs), Response to PCs, and All Public Comments Associated with each PC ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Best Available Science .................................................................................................................. 39 Fire ................................................................................................................................................ 43 Fish ................................................................................................................................................ 46 Forest Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 49 Management Indicator Species...................................................................................................... 53 NEPA............................................................................................................................................. 53 Plants ............................................................................................................................................. 62 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................ 65 Recreation ...................................................................................................................................... 69 Roads ............................................................................................................................................. 82 Social Economic ............................................................................................................................ 92 Soils ............................................................................................................................................... 97 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species ............................................................................ 98 Timber ......................................................................................................................................... 158 Watershed .................................................................................................................................... 160 Outside of Scope ......................................................................................................................... 162 Vote ............................................................................................................................................. 165 Appendix A – Content Analysis Process ..................................................................................... 167 Appendix B – Coding Structure .................................................................................................. 169 Appendix C - Demographics ....................................................................................................... 172 Appendix D – List of Preparers ................................................................................................... 174 Introduction The Idaho Panhandle, Kootenai, and Lolo National forests released the “Motorized Access Management within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones” Draft Supplemental EIS in the Federal Register on May 8, 2009 to begin the official comment period, which ended on June 22, 2009. The Forests received a total of 86 comment letters from Tribes, individuals, organizations, agencies, business owners, and elected officials and were received by U.S. Post Office or email. All of the comment letters were analyzed using a process called content analysis, which was completed by a third-party contractor (see detailed process in the project record). In addition to the reports that were produced from the content analysis process, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) members read all of the comment letters. Of the 86 comment letters that contained unique and substantially different comments, there were 857 comments that were coded, analyzed, addressed, and entered into an Access database. The 857 comments were then associated with Public Concern statements (PCs) and the IDT then developed responses to each of the PCs. There were 167 PCs and they begin on page 7. 1 Summary of Public Comments on the DSEIS for Motorized Access Management Within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recover Zones Content Analysis Process The Forest Service followed a systematic process of carefully logging-in, numbering, reading, coding and summarizing all viewpoints and concerns that were submitted. The comments that were most helpful were those that were unique, substantially different, and were specifically related to the analysis disclosed in the DSEIS. In addition to capturing unique and substantially different comments, this report attempts to reflect the emotion and strength of public sentiment in order to represent the public’s values and concerns as fairly as possible. When an individual raised multiple concerns within the same letter, each unique comment was numbered and tracked separately. Each comment was assigned a unique tracking number and coded by subject or topic (see Appendices for the detailed content analysis process and for the coding structure). Once the unique and substantially different comments were coded, concerns raised by different commenters on the same subject and with the same intent and issue were grouped and summarized into public concern statements that capture the essence of those like-concerns. In this way, multiple comments may be addressed by one response. In some cases, more nuanced or complex concerns may be answered through multiple responses to multiple concern statements, or they may have a single response dedicated to just that specific commenter. It is important to keep in mind that even though the public concern statements attempt to capture the full range of public issues and concerns, they should be reviewed with the understanding that there is no limitation on who submits comments. Therefore, the comments received do not necessarily represent the sentiments of the public as a whole. This report attempts to provide fair representation of the wide range of views submitted. Every comment has the same value, whether expressed by many, or by one respondent. Analyzing comments is not a vote-counting process. The Forest Service response to the public comments, which in some cases resulted in changes to the DEIS, was not determined by majority opinion but rather by the substance of the comments. The content analysis process ensured that every comment was read, analyzed, and considered. List of Commenters Each public concern statement is accompanied by a response that was developed by subject matter experts. In addition, each PC and response is accompanied by all of the public comments associated with each PC. The public comments provide commenter’s specific perspectives and rationale regarding that concern. For each public comment, it indicates the letter number after the comment, enabling the reader to track and review the original comment letters, if desired (see the column Letter No. in Table 1). The primary purpose is to provide a topical review of voluminous comments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—House H1808
    H1808 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE April 12, 1999 RESIGNATION AS MEMBER OF into our most serious secret weapons Foreign assistance used under the COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS programs, is described as almost total. microcredit program is loaned and paid The SPEAKER laid before the House Mr. Speaker, nuclear warhead tech- back with interest and is recycled and the following resignation as a member nology might be hard for most to con- used for new loans, thus reaching an ceive, but the fact that China could of the Committee on Small Business: even greater percentage of the world's conceivably have the power to kill as poor. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, many as seven million Americans with HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Microcredit is empowerment. It is a Washington, DC, March 25, 1999. one missile is something that I think tool which builds upon the human spir- Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, everyone can visualize. it. It is the U.S. helping others to help Speaker, House of Representatives, This Chinese espionage has gone on themselves. Microcredit is action in Washington, DC. far too long. I urge the Security Coun- support of our humanitarian instincts DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Last week I was ap- cil to release the Cox report because and objectives. pointed to the Committee on Government this administration needs to stand up I support this program, and when the Reform. As a result of this appointment, I and take responsibility for release of bill comes to the floor, H.R. 1143, I ask hereby resign as a member of the Committee this Top Secret technology, and the that my colleagues give their strong on Small Business.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Southern Otay Mountain and Western Otay Mountain Wilderness Study Areas, San Diego County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1711-E AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Tom Fry (Acting) Director, Bureau of Land Management on H.R
    STATEMENT OF TOM FRY (ACTING) DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ON H.R. 15 OTAY MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS ACT OF 1999 BEFORE THE HOUSE RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDS February 4, 1999 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to testify on H.R. 15, the Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of 1999. I want to commend the bill's sponsor, Congressman Brian Bilbray (R-CA) for introducing this legislation which recognizes the unique nature of the area by protecting its many outstanding and precious natural resources for generations to come. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) strongly supports H.R. 15. We also recognize and appreciate the Subcommittee's work last Congress which amended H.R. 3950, the Otay Mountain Wilderness bill, also introduced by Mr. Bilbray. Our only objection to H.R. 3950 was the Section 6(b) language on Border Enforcement, Drug Interdiction, and Wildland Fire Protection. The amended Section 6(b) language, which appears in H.R. 15, was requested by the Administration and is in keeping with the mandate and intent of the 1964 Wilderness Act. We thank Congressman Bilbray and the Subcommittee Members for addressing our unusual and important access needs in the area. I also want to comment briefly on Secretary Babbitt's recent tour of Otay Mountain. While there, the Secretary met with many individuals and local officials committed to preserving the special resources of this area. He was very impressed, encouraged, persuaded and enlightened by the diverse group he traveled with including Representative Bob Filner, San Diego County representatives, the staffs to Senators Feinstein and Boxer, staff to Congressman Brian Bilbray, the San Diego Association of Governments, the California Biodiversity Council, the Sierra Club, the Endangered Habitat League, The Wilderness Society, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114Th Congress
    Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114th Congress Katie Hoover Analyst in Natural Resources Policy Kristina Alexander Legislative Attorney Sandra L. Johnson Information Research Specialist January 12, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41610 Wilderness: Legislation and Issues in the 114th Congress Summary The Wilderness Act of 1964 established the National Wilderness Preservation System and directed that only Congress can designate federal lands as part of the system. Free-standing bills to designate wilderness areas are typically introduced and considered in each Congress; such bills are not amendments to the Wilderness Act, but typically refer to the act for management guidance and sometimes include special provisions. Numerous wilderness bills were introduced in the 112th Congress, but it was the first Congress since 1966 that did not add to the wilderness system. The only wilderness law that was enacted in the 112th Congress reduced the size of a wilderness area. At the end of the 113th Congress, multiple wilderness designations and expansions were included in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2015 (NDAA) (P.L. 113-291, §§3060-3062, 3064-3066). The NDAA expanded or created wilderness in five states: Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Washington. Wilderness designation can be controversial. The designation generally prohibits commercial activities, motorized access, and human infrastructure from wilderness areas; however, there are several exceptions to this general rule. Advocates propose wilderness designations to preserve the generally undeveloped conditions of the areas. Opponents see such designations as preventing certain uses and potential economic development in rural areas where such opportunities are relatively limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations
    Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations For reader convenience, all wilderness evaluation documents are compiled here, including duplicate sections that are also found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D Inventoried Roadless Areas. Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas Proposed Wilderness by and Wilderness Evaluations Alternative Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Roadless areas refer to substantially natural landscapes without constructed and maintained roads. Some improvements and past activities are acceptable within roadless areas. Inventoried roadless areas are identified in a set of maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Volume 2, November 2000. These areas may contain important environmental values that warrant protection and are, as a general rule, managed to preserve their roadless characteristics. In the past, roadless areas were evaluated as potential additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Roadless areas have maintained their ecological and social values, and are important both locally and nationally. Recognition of the values of roadless areas is increasing as our population continues to grow and demand for outdoor recreation and other uses of the Forests rises. These unroaded and undeveloped areas provide the Forests with opportunities for potential wilderness, as well as non-motorized recreation, commodities and amenities. The original Forest Plans evaluated Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) data from the mid- 1980s and recommended wilderness designation for some areas. Most areas were left in a roadless, non- motorized use status. This revision of Forest Plans analyzes a new and more complete land inventory of inventoried roadless areas as well as other areas identified by the public during scoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 36 February 23, 2011 Pages 9939–10204
    Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 36 February 23, 2011 Pages 9939–10204 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:57 Feb 22, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7217 Sfmt 7217 E:\FR\FM\TITLEPG.XXX TITLEPG srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS NARA.EPS FR.EPS II Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Justification Bureau of Land Management FY2022
    The United States BUDGET Department of the Interior JUSTIFICATIONS and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2022 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NOTICE: These budget justifications are prepared for the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittees. Approval for release of the justifications prior to their printing in the public record of the Subcommittee hearings may be obtained through the Office of Budget of the Department of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper Bureau of Land Management 2022 Budget Justifications TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ I-1 II. Crosscutting Programs .................................................................................................................. II-1 III. Budget at a Glance ....................................................................................................................... III-1 IV. Collections .................................................................................................................................... IV-1 V. Management of Lands and Resources ......................................................................................... V-1 Appropriations Language ................................................................................................................ V-1 Appropriations Language Citations ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Agenda for August 26 WCB Board Meeting
    Gavin Newsom, Governor NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD Mailing Address: P.O. Box 944209 Sacramento, California 94244-2090 www.wcb.ca.gov (916) 445-8448 Fax (916) 323-0280 Final Meeting Agenda WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD August 26, 2020, 10:00 a.m. *Consistent with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, the public and Board members will participate in the meeting via Microsoft Teams Meeting or teleconference. Public comment will be accepted per the agenda. A recording will be posted after the meeting. Join Microsoft Teams Meeting +1 916-535-0984 Conference ID: 281 604 32# • If joining for iPhone or Android users, you will need to have Microsoft Teams Meeting App installed on your phone. Click the Teams Meeting link and join as guest. • If joining from a PC or Mac, you can either install or join in browser. Once you join, sign in as guest. • If joining from a CDFW device, you should be able to connect like any other Teams Meeting. You can also join just by phone though you will not be able to see the PowerPoint. *If you anticipate commenting during the Public Comment period or on a particular agenda item and would like to register your name ahead of time, please complete this Speaker Card (Word) and email to [email protected] prior to the day of the meeting. Wildlife Conservation Board Meeting, August 26, 2020 Final Meeting Agenda Summary .................................................................................. i 1. Roll Call ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Public Forum for Items not on this Agenda .................................................... 2 3.
    [Show full text]