Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations School of Religion Summer 2003 An Analysis of the Arguments for the Dating of the Fourth Gospel David A. Croteau Liberty University,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Croteau, David A., "An Analysis of the Arguments for the Dating of the Fourth Gospel" (2003). Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 118. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/118 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Religion at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. 46 Faith & Mission Faith & Mission 20/3 (Summer 2003) 47-80 47 39Ibid., 97. An Analysis of the Arguments for the 411Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuch (Cambridge: University Press, 1991), 246. Dating of the Fourth Gospel 4lIbid., 252 . .12Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, trans. E. F. Payne, in Larrimore, 264. 43Ibid., 268. I I David A. Croteau F= ,:= Ph.D. Student in Biblical Studies (New Testament) Southeastem Baptist Theological Seminary Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 1= b:: Introduction here are various arguments for the date of composition of the Fourth Gospel. Forty-one lines of argument will be discussed below. The date of Tthe Fourth Gospel will have significance for how one views the purpose statement, the occasion for writing, the author, and the location of origin (provi dence). At times one's interpretation may be influenced by how one decides on a date and vice-versa.