DOCSLIB.ORG

$2.4 Billion Capital Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
$2.4 Billion Capital Plan NORFOLK SOUTHERN’S 2015 With track and facilities across 20,000 miles and 22 states, NS operates a capital intensive business. In 2015, we plan $2.4 BILLION to invest a record $2.4 billion to ensure our rail system is in top condition to serve customers and communities. This map Rouses Point outlines some of the major projects to add capacity, enhance CAPITAL PLAN service, and support business growth. Ayer GROWING INTERMODAL INVESTING FOR IMPROVING MIDWEST BRIDGES & CRESCENT CORRIDOR CUSTOMER GROWTH & CHICAGO GATEWAYS Albany NS plans to rebuild or repair 96 bridges, FLORIDA DELAWARE ILLINOIS trestles, culverts, and spans, including: Buffalo 8 Binghamton 1 Jacksonville: Expand 1 Porter: Upgrade signals, 1 Chicago Area ALABAMA intermodal facility extend sidings ❏ Chicago-to-Butler, IND.: Detroit 1 Boligee: Replace trestle. Crossover projects. Multi-year project. 4 New York/ GEORGIA LOUISIANA Chicago 1 7 Cleveland ❏ CREATE Projects: 4 6 Northern New Jersey 2 Atlanta: Expand Austell intermodal 2 New Orleans: Upgrade GEORGIA Des Moines Elkhart Harrisburg Track and signal improvements 6 4 3 5 facility Chalmette line Toledo Bellevue 1 6 7 11 2 Blanton: Replace trestle. 12 Pittsburgh Philadelphia/ along Western Avenue. 2 9 10 10 Macon: Replace trestle over Rocky Ft. Wayne Southern New Jersey NORTH CAROLINA GEORGIA ❏ Expansions and improvements at 3 Kankakee 1 Peoria 3 Charlotte: Intermodal 3 Atlanta: Inman Yard improvements 3 intermodal terminals: Calumet, Creek. 5 Columbus facility improvements 4 Doraville: Construct Thoroughbred 47th St., and 63rd St. Add tracks ILLINOIS Decatur Washington, D.C. 9 Bulk Transfer Facility and parking spots. 4 Chicago: Rehabilitate 12 railroad 7 9 Manassas NEW JERSEY ❏ Yard improvements: Expand Indianapolis Charleston 13 4 Newark: Install automated gate KENTUCKY bridges at 51st St. intermodal facility Cincinnati Richmond Colehour Yard and build 8 Litchfield system at Croxton intermodal facility 5 Georgetown: Expand yard entrance. Multi-year project. 13 connecting track to CN 6 Roanoke 9 6 Louisville-to-Danville: INDIANA Kansas City 5 Lynchburg OHIO 2 Kankakee: Expand yard, construct 5 Louisville 12 Norfolk Signal improvements St. Louis Lexington 14 10 5 De Gonia: Replace trestle. 6 14 5 Columbus: Expand crossovers and upgrade sidings near Danville 6 East Chicago: Rehabilitate 8 Rickenbacker intermodal facility ILLINOIS Schneider, Ind., and Reddick, Ill. moveable bridge over Indiana Harbor Winston-Salem 7 Decatur: Yard improvements 11 PENNSYLVANIA INDIANA Canal. Raleigh 8 Litchfield: Build track connection 6 Harrisburg: Expand parking 3 Elkhart: Track extension and Knoxville MICHIGAN at intermodal facility INDIANA crossover installation around terminal 3 Charlotte 7 Monroe: Rebuild bridge over River (PPP with PA) 9 Roanoke: Yard improvements 4 Hammond-to-Porter: Seven Morehead City Raisin. Memphis Chattanooga 7 Rutherford: Expand projects as part of the Indiana PENNSYLVANIA intermodal facility Gateway, a PPP with FRA, Amtrak, NEW YORK Columbia 10 Derry: Construct coal load-out (PPP with PA and FHWA) and IND. 8 Portageville: Replace bridge over 4 11 Philadelphia: Construct crossover Genesee River. Multi-year project. 2 3 Atlanta VIRGINIA track at Abrams Yard; track changes OHIO (PPP with NY) Birmingham Charleston 8 Glade Springs: at West Falls 5 Bellevue: Complete Bellevue Yard Siding extension expansion project. Extend siding 1 3 12 Pittsburgh: Expand Conway Yard OHIO Macon (PPP with VA) at Shinrock, build crossovers at 9 Chillicothe: Replace double-track Savannah 9 Manassas-to-Lynchburg: VIRGINIA Vermilion, and upgrade signals and Dallas Meridian spans over Marietta Road. Increase track speeds 13 Richmond: Increase bridge complete track connection from Shreveport PENNSYLVANIA Brunswick (PPP with VA) clearances (PPP with VA) Bellevue to Sandusky District. 10 Pittsburgh: Replace bridge over 2 10 Montgomery: Tunnel clearances WEST VIRGINIA 6 Toledo: Terminal improvements Federal St. Multi-year project. 1 Jacksonville (PPP with VA) Mobile 14 War: Track improvements TENNESSEE New Orleans 2 11 Afton: Replace span on bridge over Ripley Island Road. Multi-year project. Titusville INVESTING $2.4 BILLION VIRGINIA 12 Chesapeake: Rehabilitate $1.27 BILLION $642 MILLION $484 MILLION moveable bridge over Elizabeth River. Norfolk Southern Railway and its Bridges FOR SAFETY, (PPP with Virginia) Railroad Operating Subsidiaries • RAIL, TIE, BALLAST • FREIGHT CARS • POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL Improvements to Midwest 13 Elkton: Replace spans over NS Trackage/Haulage Rights and Chicago Gateways & BRIDGE RENEWAL Hawksbill Creek. Norfolk Southern Joint Ventures Investing for Customer Growth LOCOMOTIVES TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES Miami GROWTH • • Crescent Corridor Growing Intermodal • INTRASTRUCTURE & The Crescent Corridor WEST VIRGINIA NS Station & FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS • OTHER PROJECTS Gateway City to Western Railroads PPP = Public-Private Partnership & SERVICE 14 Ingleside: Replace double-track spans on bridge over Rt. 112 and East © 2015 Norfolk Southern Corporation All Rights Reserved 10.0215.8482.1 River. Multi-year project..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rainready Calumet Corridor, IL Plan
    RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MARCH 2017 ©2017 CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS Purpose of the RainReady Plan 1 A Citizen’s Guide to a RainReady Robbins i The Problem 2 The Path Ahead 3 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS How to Use This Plan 4 COMMUNITY SNAPSHOT 1 INTRODUCTION 5 ROBBINS, IL AT A GLANCE 2 The Vision 5 Flooding Risks and Resilience Opportunities 3 THE PROBLEM 6 RAINREADY ROBBINS COMMUNITY SURVEY 8 CAUSES AND IMPACTS OF URBAN FLOODING 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS IN ROBBINS, IL Your Homes and Neighborhoods 10 THE PATH FORWARD 23 Your Business Districts and Shopping Centers 12 What Can We Do? 23 Your Industrial Centers and How to Approach Financing Transportation Corridors 14 RainReady Communities 26 Your Open Space and Natural Areas 16 Community Assets 18 PARTNERS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 29 Steering Committees 30 COMMUNITY PRIORITIES 20 Technical Advisory Committee 33 Non-TAC Advisors 33 RAINREADY ACTION PLAN 22 THE PLANNING PROCESS 34 Purpose of the RainReady Plan 34 RAINREADY ROBBINS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Planning and Outreach Approach 36 Goal 1: Reorient 24 Goal 2: Repair 28 REGIONAL CONTEXT 42 Goal 3: Retrofit 31 RAINREADY: REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT SUMMARY 50 RAINREADY SOLUTIONS GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 55 A RainReady Future is Possible! 55 RAINREADY GOALS 56 The Three R’s: Reorient, Repair, Retrofit 56 THE THREE R’S 61 GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 62 Goal 1: Reorient 64 Goal 2: Repair 66 Goal 3: Retrofit 67 RAINREADY CALUMET CORRIDOR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of the RainReady Plan From more intense storms and chronic urban flooding to economic constraints and aging infrastructure, communities across the nation must find ways to thrive in the midst of shocks and stresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois
    Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4126 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY INDIANA Characterization of Fill Deposits in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois By ROBERT T. KAY, THEODORE K. GREEMAN, RICHARD R DUWELIUS, ROBIN B. KING, and JOHN E. NAZIMEK, U.S. Geological Survey, and DAVID M. PETROVSKI, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4126 Prepared In cooperation with the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY De Kalb, Illinois Indianapolis, Indiana 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names in this report is for identification or location purposes only, and does not constitute endorsement of products by the U.S. Geological Survey, nor impute responsibility for any present or potential effects on the natural resources. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 221 N. Broadway Branch of Information Services Urbana, IL61801 Box 25286 (217)344-0037 Denver, CO 80225-0286 District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 5957 Lakeside Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46278-1996 CONTENTS Abstract..................................................................^ 1 Introduction....................................................._
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Rail B
    FREIGHT RAIL B Pennsylvania has 57 freight railroads covering 5127 miles across the state, ranking it 4th largest rail network by mileage in the U.S. By 2035, 246 million tons of freight is expected to pass through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, an increase of 22 percent over 2007 levels. Pennsylvania’s railroad freight demand continues to exceed current infrastructure. Railroad traffic is steadily returning to near- World War II levels, before highways were built to facilitate widespread movement of goods by truck. Rail projects that could be undertaken to address the Commonwealth’s infrastructure needs total more than $280 million. Annual state-of-good-repair track and bridge expenditures for all railroad classes within the Commonwealth are projected to be approximately $560 million. Class I railroads which are the largest railroad companies are poised to cover their own financial needs, while smaller railroads are not affluent enough and some need assistance to continue service to rural areas of the state. BACKGROUND A number of benefits result from using rail freight to move goods throughout the U.S. particularly on longer routes: congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, enhancement of transportation safety, reduction of truck traffic on highways, and economic development. Railroads also remain the safest and most cost efficient mode for transporting hazardous materials, coal, industrial raw materials, and large quantities of goods. Since the mid-1800s, rail transportation has been the centerpiece of industrial production and energy movement. Specifically, in light of the events of September 11, 2001 and from a national security point of view, railroads are one of the best ways to produce a more secure system for transportation of dangerous or hazardous products.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 5
    Reuben Wells Locomotive The Reuben Wells Locomotive is a fifty-six ton engine named after the Jeffersonville, Indiana, mechanic who designed it in 1868. This was no ordinary locomotive. It was designed to carry train cars up the steepest rail incline in the country at that time—in Madison, Indi- ana. Before the invention of the Reuben Wells, trains had to rely on horses or a cog system to pull them uphill. The cog system fitted a wheel to the center of the train for traction on steep inclines. You can now see the Reuben Wells at the Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. You can also take rides on historic trains that depart from French Lick and Connersville, Indiana. 114 | Hoosiers and the American Story 2033-12 Hoosiers American Story.indd 114 8/29/14 10:59 AM 5 The Age of Industry Comes to Indiana [The] new kind of young men in business downtown . had one supreme theory: that the perfect beauty and happiness of cities and of human life was to be brought about by more factories. — Booth Tarkington, The Magnificent Ambersons (1918) Life changed rapidly for Hoosiers in the decades New kinds of manufacturing also powered growth. after the Civil War. Old ways withered in the new age Before the Civil War most families made their own of industry. As factories sprang up, hopes rose that food, clothing, soap, and shoes. Blacksmith shops and economic growth would make a better life than that small factories produced a few special items, such as known by the pioneer generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L
    MS 711 RG 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION / AMTRAK : JAMES L. LARSON OPERATIONS AND PLANNING FILES 1971-2003, bulk 1976-2003. 16.5 linear ft. Original order has been maintained. The James L. Larson files are arranged in the following series: 1. REPORTS 2. CHRONOLOGICAL FILES 3. LAWSUITS PROVENANCE Gift of Mrs. Mary Larson (387-2090), 2011. HISTORICAL INFORMATION James Llewellyn Larson was born on March 27, 1935 in Madison, Wisconsin to Ruth (Thurber) and LeRoy Larson. While attending high school, Mr. Larson spent many hours at the Chicago and North Western Railway Company's interlocking tower in Madison, Wisconsin where he learned telegraphy. He went to work for the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad in 1952 as an agent, telegrapher, and tower operator. In 1953, Mr. Larson began working for the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company as a telegrapher, then as a wire changer. During his 20-year tenure with C&NW, he worked in the Operating Department, was a Train Dispatcher from 1957 to 1959, and then spent eight years as an Assistant Trainmaster and a Trainmaster. He was a System Rules Examiner from 1966 to 1968, an Assistant Division Superintendent from 1968 to 1969, Assistant Superintendent -Transportation from 1969 to 1972, where he managed Operations Center in Chicago. From 1972 to 1973, he was an Assistant Division Master of Transportation on the Twin Cities Division. Mr. Larson was recruited by Amtrak in 1973. During his 25-year tenure with Amtrak he served as Manager of Station Operations, Director of Personnel, Assistant Vice President of Administrative Staff, and Assistant Vice President of Contracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Context
    1. Preface This plan serves as the update to Chapter 12, the transportation plan element, of the 2003 Cumberland County Comprehensive Plan. Background information and specific statistics on the modes of transportation in the county can be found in Chapter 11 of the comprehensive plan and in the Harrisburg Area Transportation Study (HATS) Long Range Transportation Plan1. 2. Introduction Cumberland County is home to a variety of transportation resources ranging from interstate highways to sidewalks in local neighborhoods. The transportation infrastructure found in the county supports the national, state and local economies and the high quality of life in our communities, alike. The value of our transportation system warrants the county’s involvement in its planning, design, construction and maintenance. Cumberland County’s transportation planning authority emanates from Article III of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act 247 of 1968. The MPC requires county comprehensive plans to include a plan for the “movement of people and goods” that includes all modes of transportation. Under this planning authorization the county’s actual role in planning and implementing improvements for all modes of transportation must be carefully managed. This plan identifies the salient transportation issues and needs facing the county and recommends a series of county-based strategies and action steps aimed at addressing the identified needs and issues. 3. Highways and Bridges Issues and Needs Cumberland County has an extensively developed highway network that provides for local, regional, and national transportation. All roads in the county are owned and maintained by municipalities, the state, or the federal government. The rich hydrologic resources of Cumberland County are spanned by 438 bridges that are over 20’ in length2.
    [Show full text]
  • HATS Regional Freight Plan Update Followed the Following Primary Tasks
    Harrisburg Area TransportaƟ on Study REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN Thursday, June 29, 2017 September 2017 This page intentionally left blank Harrisburg Area Transportation Study Regional Freight Plan Prepared for: Harrisburg Area Transportation Study 112 Market Street, 2nd Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 234‐2639 www.tcrpc‐pa.org/hats/ By: Michael Baker International, Inc. 4431 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 213‐2900 September 22, 2017 The preparation of this publication was financed in part through the United States Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. 4 Harrisburg Area Transportation Study Regional Freight Plan Message from the MPO Chairman Dear reader – Whether you are a municipal official, major shipper/receiver, or freight carrier, we all share a common objective: to keep our regional freight infrastructure operating at peak condition. We all recognize that having good freight infrastructure is a vital part of maintaining our economy. The Greater Harrisburg area has historically served as a freight hub – that distinction has only grown, even as our economic base has transitioned from one of manufacturing to one of transportation and logistics. The Harrisburg Area Transportation Study continues to work with PennDOT and its many partners in investing in our freight transportation system. This includes notable, high‐profile projects such as the widening of Interstate 81 between PA 581 and PA 114, and improvements to Interstate 83 in Dauphin County. More are on the way. The formal update of the regional freight plan over the past year has provided us with an opportunity to take a closer look at the freight concerns our region faces.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service
    ! ! ! ! ! ! EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Quad Cities-Chicago ! ! ! ! ! ! #$%&'$%(!)*+! ,-.-!/$'01%! 233435'05!647%!#$%34(%05!8!95'5%!'0(!:;<<=5%$!#'$50%$3>4&3!?:%05$'@A! ! B-!#-!C;DD<'0! #$4074&'@!EDD47%$!8!,4(F%35!:;$$4(;$3! ! )-!G-!C4@@H@;<! 9%04;$!I4$%75;$!J!95'5%!#'$50%$3>4&3! ! ! 2<5$'1! :>47'K;L!M@@40;43! N'0='$*!OL!PQQR! ! " ! ! EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Quad Cities-Chicago Table of Contents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`B%V%0=%!/;$%7'35!9=<<'$*!8!2@@!B;=5%3! "^! ! 6- 9=<<'$*!;D!a%*!W=<H%$3!8!#$;&;3%(!:>47'K;`b='(!:454%3! "^J"U! ! 6M- ,;H4@4c'54;0!:;353!?;0%J54<%!%d&%03%A! "U! ! 255'7><%05+!27$;0*<3! "O! ! ! P ! EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Quad Cities-Chicago I.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Strategies for Improving Rail Energy Efficiency
    U.S. Department of Transportation Best Practices and Strategies for Federal Railroad Improving Rail Energy Efficiency Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-14/02 Final Report January 2014 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Calumet and Calumet River Area
    Illinois Coastal Management Program 2011 This Issue Paper contains opinions that may or may not be the policy of the IDNR. Illinois Coastal Management Program Issue Paper Lake Calumet and Calumet River Area A. General Description The Lake Calumet and Calumet River area is highly urbanized. The economy was once completely dominated by manufacturing, particularly the steel industry. The large production mills are now gone, totally demolished and sitting idle as ―brownfields.‖ However, some steel-related and other heavy industries remain in the area. They transfer coal, lime, slag and other products to and from the Local and Indiana mills. Large industrial structures still line the 8-mile length of the Calumet River, from its mouth on Lake Michigan to Lake Calumet. Historic, beautifully designed steel bridges cross over the river at several points. Working class neighborhoods surround the lake and the river. They include South Chicago, South Deering, East Side, Pullman, and Hegewisch. Together these five neighborhoods hold nearly 100,000 people. Other nearby neighborhoods include West Pullman, Roseland, Calumet Park and Riverdale. The Calumet area contains very important natural areas. Remnant prairie and wetland systems exist throughout the area on public and private lands. Some are recognized statewide for their high levels of native plant and animal species. Many are recognized by the state as Illinois Natural Area Inventory Sites. This unique mixture of industrial and natural lands gives the Calumet region a remarkable landscape. It is a landscape of extremes, of remarkably valuable habitats amidst vast fields of industry. It offers enormous potential for community revitalization in a post-industrial era.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan
    Draft Final PENNSYLVANIA COMPREHENSIVE FREIGHT MOVEMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: June 3, 2015 PA On Track Freight Planning: A Multi-state and Multi-modal Approach Supply chains and freight flows vary by commodity, industry, supply and demand, and origins and destinations and are rarely limited to a single jurisdiction. Transportation freight plans are best approached by a multi-faceted perspective of trade lanes, key commodities, or key industries in the U.S. and neighboring trade partners, such as Latin America and Canada, rather than simply from a state’s geography. PennDOT, for example, is a critical component of the freight movement system in the I- 95 Corridor – a region of 16 States (from Maine to Florida) generating 41% of the Nation’s Gross Domestic Product and representing 40% of the Nation’s population. Within this essential region are: • 41 Ports, and Coastal Shipping Lanes in the Atlantic, and the Intercostal and Inland Waterways • 106+ Airports • 907,000 miles of Highway • 30,495 miles of Freight Railroad Track, with 1,111 heavy-rail directional route miles (70% of the national total) As international markets continue to emerge for imports and exports, and with expansions of the Panama and Suez Canals, the port-airport-rail-highway system in the I- 95 Corridor will remain one of the most critical components of the United States’ freight network. Comprehensive freight planning must address the systems within individual political jurisdictions or state boundaries while recognizing the multi-state economic corridor that comprises the trip of a particular mode. Assistance for addressing the growing needs of the industry will come from the USDOT national freight strategic plan guidance, with its national freight framework built upon multistate corridors.
    [Show full text]