DOCSLIB.ORG

Integration of Testing Methodologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TESTNET A Network of excellence Integration of Testing Methodologies Participation and Expectations of Airbus Deutschland H.J. Tews Airbus Deutschland GmbH Test Methods and Means Kreetslag10 D21129 Hamburg, Germany 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 1 Ownership of the Airbus (SAS) EADS (N.V.) BAE SYSTEMS 80% 20% Airbus SAS Airbus Airbus Airbus Airbus France Deutschland España UK Airbus is a company under French law (SAS). 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 2 Development of Aerospace Industry in Europe bis 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Breguet Dassault Aviation Marcel Dassault Air Fouga Morane-Saulnier Quest-Aviation Sud-Aviation Aerospatiale Nord-Aviation Arsenal AEA EADS MTU München Weser-Flug Focke-Wulf Heinkel VFW MTU MBB München HFB DASA Messerschmitt Bölkow Fairchild -Dornier Junkers Dornier CASA HASA Britisch Aircraft Corp Hawker Siddeley BAe BAe Systems Dynamics Marconi Electronic Scottish Aviation 50 years of restructuring efforts have led to a consolidation within the European Aerospace industry. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 3 Airbus in Europe Meaulte Broughton • Cockpit-Structure • Wing • Shells, small part • Major part mach. Hamburg machining u Engineering Filton • FAL A319/A321 St. Nazaire u Engineering • Fuselage sections • Fuselage section • Wing assemblies • Mat.-,equip. –comp. • Metal components Bremen u Engineering Nantes • Wing equipment • Center wing box • Metal components • Mach. of maj. comp. Nordenham Toulouse • Fuselage shells u Engineering • Large sheets • FAL WB/LR,A320 • Pylons Stade • VTP Getafe • Composites u Engineering Varel • HTP • Machining parts • Composites • Tooling Illescas Laupheim • Composites • Interior comp. • Air duct Cadiz/Puerto Real • HTP-Structure The Airbus is mainly engineered and produced in Germany, France, England and Spain. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 4 History of Airbus Deutschland GmbH 1930 Weser Focke Wulf Heinkel Hamburger Junkers Messer- Bölkow Flugzeugbau Flugzeug- Flugzeugwerke Flugzeugbau AG schmitt GmbH 1940 GmbH bau AG GmbH GmbH AG 1950 1960 VFW GmbH Messerschmitt Bölkow GmbH 1970 MBB GmbH* 1980 MBB GmbH MBB GmbH Deutsche Airbus GmbH DaimlerDaimler-Benz-Benz AerospaceAerospace AirbusAirbus 1990 *Transport Aircraft GmbH GmbH Division becomes a DaimlerChryslerDaimlerChryslerAerospaceAerospace partner in the Airbus GmbHAirbus GmbH Airbus Program 2000 EADS Airbus GmbH Airbus Deutschland GmbH Airbus Deutschland GmbH: A long tradition in aircraft design and manufacturing. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 5 Research and Technology Multidisciplinary Concept Structural Mechanics/Production § New-technology fuselage § Flexible aircraft § Advanced assembly concepts § Improved concepts thru theapplication of advanced IP tools Passenger systems § Electronic flight control §Cabin communications §Intelligent actuator § Aerodynamics §Cabin systems §Power-by-wire actuator § Reduction of aerodynamic drag §Air and water supply systems §Technology § Laminar vertical tail §Insulation systems §Software technology § High-lift configuration In order to remain competitive on the world market, Airbus Deutschland GmbH continually invests in future technologies. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 6 Test of A/C Systems New Avionic Standards & Technologies New IT Standards & Technologies New Quality Standards & Regulations Next Generation Aircraft Cabin Systems New Test Practises New Aircraft Cabin System Technologies Extended Cabin Systems Functionalities New Test Strategies New Integrated Modular Avionic Concept New Test Methods & Means New Test Facilities Extended System and Test RequirementsTttt Technological Objectives § More efficient and comprehensive test processes § Tests of all integrated cabin systems functionalities before first power-on § Similar test architecture for all types of tests § Tracing of test results to basic system functional requirements § Reduction of program risks and support ‚First Time Right‘ 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 7 Test of A/C Systems New Test Strategies acc. SAE ARP 4754 and Airbus Directives / Procedures § Execution of multi-system & system integration tests to verify aircraft cabin syste ms before assembly of first aircraft § Application of validated simulation models to perform computer -aided tests and to simulate the complete system environment § Achievement of adaptable test resources with standardised interfaces to prevent technological obsolescence § Implementation of a continuous computer-aided tool chain from the system design process to the systems test process and therefore from top A/C functional requirements to A/C certification 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 8 Expectations of Airbus Deutschland Exchange of information and ideas with other Industries and Universities in a network of excellence about § Validation & Verification Philosophy, § Validation & Verification Strategies, § Validation & Verification Concepts § Validation & Verification Methods and Means for highly integrated and safety critical systems Use of synergies between Aerospace, Universities and other Industries regarding testing of embedded software and of fault tolerant and safety critical systems 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 9 Thank You for your attention Airbus Deutschland GmbH 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 10 V-Diagram and V&V Process Enhanced Development Process A/C-Functional Certification Plan Certification Management A/C-Certification Requirements Means of Compliance Validation Management Route Proving Validation Plan System TLAR FTR Flight Tests Ground Tests TLSRD Test Requirements GTR Validation Phase FRD Test Strategies SITR System Integration Test Technologies Tests SRD Multi -System Tests SDD System Tests PTS QTR ATR Equipment Qualification Tests PTS Equipment Tests System/Equipment Development Verification Phase Production Vendor Responsibility TLAR Top Level Aircraft Requirements ATR Acceptance Test Requirements TLSRD Top Level System Requirements Document QTR Qualification Test Requirements FRD Functional Requirement Document SITR System Integration Requirements SRD System Requirements Document GTR Ground Test Requirements SDD System Description Document FTR Flight Test Requirements PTS Purchaser Technical Specification acc. SAE ARP 4754 and Airbus Directives 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 11 Airbus Workshares Vertical stabilizer Fin Section 31 Aft Tailcone Aft fuselage Section 18 Section 19.1 System capability for all Wing Airbus programs: Section 20 Aft centrefuselage Section 16/17 Centrefuselage Engine pylon Section 15 § Fuselage (fwd and aft), Section 41 Fwd centre fuselage systems Section 13/14 Fwd Tailcone Section 19 § Wing center box SA Fwd nose fuselage § Vertical tail Section 11/12 Horizontal Tailplane HTP § Interior furnishing Section 10 Section 35 § Wing equipping WB and LR Components manufactured by partner and incorporated into § Final assembly the particular section by (A318, A319, A321) Centrewing box another Section 21 Engine Main landing gear door Section 32 AIRBUS-Fr AIRBUS-Esp IAE or CFMI AIRBUS-De Belairbus Goodrich AIRBUS-UK Core competences in the Airbus system established in the past 30 years 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 12 Technology Topics of the Aeronautical Research Program Concept Aerodynamics Dynamics of Flexible Aircraft Multidisiplinary concept Vertical Tail Large flexible structures Laminarization Load reduction (flight demonstration) Systems Passenger Systems Flight Control High Lift Configuration In-service flexibility Commonality (software) Flight performance Comfort Weight Environmental compatibility Comfort (noise) Safety Types of Design/Production Reduction of Wing New-Technology Fuselage Aerodynamic Drag Production concept Production costs, times Flight performance Weight Weight Laminarization Life Welded structures Engine interference The participation of Airbus Deutschland in international aeronautical research program promotes highly advanced technologies. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 13 Ownership of EADS Sogepa French Lagardère Public DaimlerChrysler SEPI (French Private State) Institution French Pooling Company 30,81% 30,29 %* 5,53 % 30,29 %** Holding: Dutch Company (B.V.) EADS European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company Dutch Company (N.V.) * plus 2.75% DaimlerChrysler excess shares will be sold later ** plus 0.33% - French state The EADS company is listed on the stock exchange. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 14 Restructuring of the Aerospace Industry § Restructuring in USA § Shares in worldwide revenue of until 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 aerospace industry Lockheed Others Martin 12% Europe Northrop 33% Grumman USA 55% Boeing Raytheon More than half of the revenue of the aerospace industry worldwide is realized by the four US companies. 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 15 Test of A/C Systems Test Engine Real-Time Temporary Data Base Simulation Computer Aided Human Test Test Models Test Generation Machine Interface Data Management Data Analysis Assistant (on-line/off-line ) Data Base Interface Test Archive Systems Test Test Engine Inter Systems Requirements Preparation Test Results Data Base Configuration Data Base Data Base Data Base Data Base Uniform Test System Architecture suitable for System, Multi-Systems and Systems Integration Tests 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 16 TESTNET A Network of excellence Integration of Testing Methodologies Participation and Expectations of Airbus Deutschland H.J. Tews Airbus Deutschland GmbH Test Methods and Means Kreetslag10 D21129 Hamburg, Germany 24.09.2002 TESTNET_kick_off 1 Ownership of the Airbus (SAS) EADS (N.V.) BAE SYSTEMS 80% 20% Airbus SAS Airbus Airbus Airbus Airbus France Deutschland España UK Airbus is a
Recommended publications
  • IEG Final Report Version 8

    IEG Final Report Version 8

    Towards a European Strategic Aviation Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation Infrastructure Report of the Independent Expert Group Final Report - April 2013 0 Towards a European Strategic Aviation RDT&E Infrastructure Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Contact: Dietrich Knoerzer – Stanley Tang European Commission Directorate-General for Research & Innovation Directorate H – Transport RTD-H.3 – Aeronautics B-1049 Brussels [email protected] [email protected] 0 Towards a European Strategic Aviation RDT&E Infrastructure Preface Tasked by the European Commission and ACARE Member States Group in September 2012, a group of independent experts (IEG) has produced the following report on a European Strategic Aviation Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Infrastructure (RDT&E) and has submitted it in February 2013. The mandate provided very limited time for the group to deliberate and did not allow the complete perimeter to be addressed in the necessary depth. The IEG therefore decided to make sure it covered areas where short-term advice actions were potentially needed and where its own expertise could contribute. Nevertheless the IEG was also able to review the entire spectrum of aviation RDT&E infrastructure (identifying several additional areas as potential "strategic RDT&E capabilities", ranging from aero-engine testing and ATM, E-infrastructures and large scale demonstrators to production technology capabilities) and to recommend further work on these and other topics that it considered necessary to provide a complete and in depth review in the longer term.
  • L'arsenal De L'aéronautique

    L'arsenal De L'aéronautique

    L’impressionnant bimoteur prototype VG 10-02 en cours de montage durant l’hiver 1944-1945. L’Arsenal de l’aéronautique Ce devait être une société laboratoire, un modèle. Ce ne fut qu’un constructeur de plus, mais ses ingénieurs avec l’assistance des Centre d’essais mirent au point toutes les techniques modernes. 1 Capable d’enterrer les meilleures idées et les projets les plus utiles, le corbillard de la mort est un vé- hicule commandé par trois forts leviers : la bêtise, la mollesse et la fainéantise. On repère le premier à son inscription : « je ne sais pas », le second porte la mention : « je ne veux pas », le troisième : « ce n’est pas à moi de la faire ». Gérard Hartmann, 33 ans d’expérience professionnelle. 2 Une société modèle Dans les années trente, les députés (qui votent les budgets) et les dirigeants militaires français réalisent que par suite de manque de concentration et de partage des compétences, l’industrie aéronautique nationale a pris du re- tard par rapport aux grandes nations étrangè- res, Allemagne, Italie, Russie, Etats-Unis, Grande-Bretagne. C’est pourquoi ils décident de doter la France des structures adéquates. Avant même l’arrivée au pouvoir du Front po- pulaire, le rapporteur du budget de l’Air, le député socialiste Pierre Renaudel (1871-1935) défend l’idée d’une « société d’étude et de construction aéronautique modèle » (d’Etat). Ce sera L’Arsenal de l’aéronautique. La Grande soufflerie de Chalais-Meudon, inaugurée en 1934. Le Centre d’Essais des Moteurs et des Hélices de l’aviation militaire française passe sous le contrôle du ministère de l’Air.
  • 19710017233.Pdf

    19710017233.Pdf

    PREVIOUS BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN THIS SERIES NASA SP-7037 Scptemher 1970 Jan. itug. 1970 W'ASA SP-7037 (01) Januar~197 I Scpt. Uec. 1970 NASA SP-7037 (02) AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A Special Bibliography Supplement 2 A selection of annotated references to unclas- sified reports and journal articles that were introduced into the NASA scientific and tech- nical information system and announced in January 1971 in Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports (STAR) International Aerospace Abstracts (IAAI. Scieirtijic atrd Techirical Iirjomratioir 0jfic-e OFFICE OF INDUSTRY AFFAIRS AND TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION 1971 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION This document is available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 221 51 for $3.00. INTRODUCTION Under the terms of an interagency agreement with the Federal Aviation Admin- istration this publication has been prepared by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the joint use of both agencies and the scientific and technical community concerned with the field of aeronautical engineering. This supplement to Aeroiiautical Eiigiiieeriiig-A Special Bibliographj. (NASA SP-7037) lists 394 reports, journal articles, and other documents originally announced in January 197 1 in Scieiitific aiid Technical Aerospace Reports (STAR)or in Iiiteriiatioiial Aerospace Abstracts (IAAI. For previous bibliographies in this series, see inside of front cover. The coverage includes documents on the engineering and theoretical aspects of design, construction, evaluation, testing, operation, and performance of aircraft (includ- ing aircraft engines) and associated components, equipment, and systems. It also in- cludes research and development in aerodynamics, aeronautics, and ground support equipment for aeronautical vehicles. Each entry in the bibliography consists of a standard bibliographic citation accom- panied by an abstract.
  • Confédérafion Générale Du Travail CFTC

    Confédérafion Générale Du Travail CFTC

    CGT : Confédération générale du travail 1895 : Congrès constitutif de la confédération générale du travail CGT à Limoges du 23 au 28 septembre. Les principaux piliers en sont la fédération du livre et celle des cheminots, mais de nombreux métiers rejoindront la CGT par la suite. CFTC : Confédération française des travailleurs chrétiens 1919 : Les dirigeants du syndicat des employés du commerce et de l’industrie sont à l'initiative de la fondation de la CFTC les 1er et 2 novembre 1919, regroupant 321 syndicats et se réclamant de l’encyclique Rerum Novarum. Son objectif est de contrer la toute-puissance de la CGT dans le milieu ouvrier. CFE-CGC : Confédération française de l'encadrement - Confédération générale des cadres 1944 : La CGC a été créée le 15 octobre 1944. Catégorielle, la CGC a élargi son champ en devenant CFE-CGC en 1981, s'ouvrant aux techniciens, agents de maîtrise, ... CGT-FO : Force Ouvrière 1948 : Le 12 avril 1948 a lieu le congrès constitutif de Force Ouvrière. La décision de scission d’une branche de la CGT pour la création du syndicat Force Ouvrière a été précipité en septembre 1947 lors de la prise d’opposition de la CGT au plan Marshall (plan américain pour aider la reconstruction de l'Europe après la Seconde Guerre mondiale). CFDT : Confédération française démocratique du travail 1964 : Après la Libération, une minorité de gauche, regroupée dans la tendance « reconstruction », anime un débat interne en faveur de la « déconfessionalisation » de la CFTC. La rupture se produit en 1964 : le congrès extraordinaire des 6 et 7 novembre transforme la CFTC en CFDT.
  • Air Freight Transport a Strategic Modelling Approach on a Global Scale

    Air Freight Transport a Strategic Modelling Approach on a Global Scale

    Air freight transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale GEORGIOS TZIMOURTOS Master Thesis May 2015 Air freight Transport A strategic modelling approach on a global scale By Georgios Tzimourtos Student number: 4185269 E-mail: [email protected] in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics at the Delft University of Technology, Thesis committee: Prof.dr.ir. L.A. Tavasszy – TLO/TPM Dr. Ron van Duin (J.H.R.) – TLO/TPM Dr. Milan Janic – CiTG Dr. B.F. (Bruno) Santos – ATO/L&R An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Cover photo credits: Deutsche Lufthansa AG Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Problem statement ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Research question and objectives ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope of this research ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Approach and research methods ........................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Thesis structure ..................................................................................................................................
  • Type Rating of an Aircraft, Compare the Aircraft Model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation Column Below

    Type Rating of an Aircraft, Compare the Aircraft Model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation Column Below

    FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 19 06/28/2021 FIGURE 5-88, PILOT CERTIFICATE AIRCRAFT TYPE DESIGNATIONS – AIRPLANE NOTE: 1. As of November 2015 the FAA has begun removing marketing names from the Civil Model Designation column. When determining the appropriate type rating of an aircraft, compare the aircraft model from Block 2 of the Airworthiness Certificate to the Civil Model Designation column below. The column titled Current Type Rating Designation will show the appropriate type rating for this aircraft. EQUIVALENT CURRENT TYPE TYPE CERTIFICATE CIVIL MODEL PRIOR MODEL MILITARY RATING HOLDER DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 328 Support Services GmbH Dornier 328-100 C-146A DO-328 Dornier 328-300 None D328JET Aero Commander Division (See Israel Aircraft Industries None Ltd.) Aérospatiale, France SN 601 Corvette None SN-601 Aérospatiale/Aeritalia, France (See ATR – GIE Avions de None Transport Régional) Airbus A340-200 Series: None A-340 Models: A340-211, -212, -213 A340-300 Series: Models: A340-311, -312, -313 A340-500 Series: Models: A340-541 A340-600 Series: Models: A340-642 Airbus Canada Limited BD-500-1A10 None BD500 Partnership BD-500-1A11 Airbus Defense and Space S.A. Model: C-212-CB, C-212-CC, None CA-212 C-212-CD, C-212-CE, C-212-CF, C-212-DF, C-212-DE Model CN-235, CN-235 CN-235 Series C-295 CN-235-100, CN-235-200, CN-235-300, C-295 Airbus SAS A300, Model B2-1A None A-300 A300, Model B2-1C A300, Model B4-2C A300, Model B2K-3C A300, Model B4-103 A300, Model B2-203 A300, Model B4-203 A300, Model B4-601
  • Airbus/EADS Sign a Titanium Supply Agreement With

    Airbus/EADS Sign a Titanium Supply Agreement With

    GDM 17/2009R 20th April 2009 Airbus/EADS sign a Titanium supply agreement with VSMPO-AVISMA, integrated structure of the Russian Technologies State Corporation Airbus/EADS and VSMPO-AVISMA boost their long-term relationship Airbus, the world’s leading aircraft manufacturer, its parent company EADS, a global leader in aerospace, defence and related services and the Russian Technologies State Corporation’s integrated structure VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation, the Russian Titanium manufacturer, have signed the biggest and longest-term contract in the history of Airbus/EADS cooperation with Russian industry. The agreement was signed today in Moscow by Sergey Chemezov, General Director of the Russian Technologies State Corporation and Tom Enders, President and CEO of Airbus in the presence of Vladimir Putin, Russian Prime-Minister, Walter Jürgen Schmid, German Ambassador to Russia, Jean de Gliniasty, French Ambassador to Russia and Juan Antonio March Pujol, Spanish Ambassador to Russia. The agreement covers the supply of Titanium to Airbus and other EADS Divisions until 2020. The scope of the contract includes the supply of Titanium and covers die forging parts for all existing Airbus aircraft, including new programmes such as the A350XWB. VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation may also machine Titanium products in order to develop a vertically integrated Titanium supply chain, starting from raw materials to finished products. The contract comes as a confirmation of the framework agreement signed in July 2008 at Farnborough Airshow. The new agreement further boosts the relationship between the companies, which dates back to the early 1990s. It also enlarges Airbus’ cooperation with the Russian aviation industry, which currently includes production of components for Airbus at Russian plants, passenger to freighter aircraft conversions (P2F) and joint Research & Technology (R&T) projects.
  • SACAA Type Rating & License Endorsement List 06 May 2021

    SACAA Type Rating & License Endorsement List 06 May 2021

    SACAA Type Rating & License Endorsement List 06 May 2021 Conversion License SP / SP- Manufacturer Aircraft model name Variants Remarks training Endorsement HPA / MP D F Aerospatiale MS 760 Paris S760 ― SP HPA SN601 Corvette SN601 ― MP SE 210 Aerospatiale / Sud Aviation SE 10B3 X SE210/10B3/11/12 X MP SE 11 SE 12 Aerospatiale / Nord Aviation Nordatlas 2501 ND25 ― MP Aerospatiale / Nord Aviation C160 P Transall ND16 ― MP 260 A Nord Aerospatiale / Nord Aviation X ND26 ― MP 262 A‐B‐C Nord Aero Spaceline 377 SGTF Super Guppy SuperGuppy ― MP A300 ‐B1 ‐B2 series Airbus ‐B4 series X A300 X MP ‐C4‐200 series ‐F4‐200 series Airbus A300 ‐FFCC A300FFCC ― MP A310 ‐ 200 series ‐ 300 series Airbus A300 - B4 600 series X A310/300‐600 X MP ‐ C4 600 series ‐ F4 600 series Airbus A300 ‐ 600ST (Beluga) A300‐600ST ― MP A318 ‐ 100 series A319 ‐ 100 series A320 ‐ 100 series Airbus X A320 X MP ‐ 200 series A321 ‐ 100 series ‐ 200 series A330 ‐ 300 series ‐ 200 series X Airbus X A330/350 X MP ‐ 200 F A350 ‐ 900 series A340 ‐ 200 series ‐ 300 series Airbus X A340 X MP ‐ 500 series ‐ 600 series Airbus A380 ‐ 800 series A380 ― MP Airbus A400M A400M ― MP ALENIA AERMACCHI C27J C27J ― MP An‐26 Antonov X AN26 X MP An‐26B Nomad ‐22B Asta GAF X AstaMET X SP As per SACAR 61.09.1(4)(b)(iv) ‐24A ATR 42 (not PEC equipped) X ‐ 42‐200 / ‐300 / ‐320 ATR 42 (PEC equipped) ‐ 42‐400/500 ATR 72 (not PEC equipped) ‐ 72‐101 /102/201/202/211/212 X ATR ATR 72 (PEC equipped) X ATR42/72 X MP PEC = Propeller Electronic Control ‐ 72‐101/102/201/202 (with mod 4371) ‐ 72‐211/212 (with mod
  • Sncac/Nord Nc.701 & Nc.702 Martinet

    Sncac/Nord Nc.701 & Nc.702 Martinet

    Last updated 10 March 2021 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SNCAC/NORD NC.701 & NC.702 MARTINET ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SNCAC: Societe Nationale de Constructions Aeronautiques du Centre, Bourges, France Includes Siebel Si 204 and Aero C-3 Excludes Siebel Si 204s with civil registrations during WWII and early post-war years. 1 NC.700 F-BAIP SNCAC: prototype French production, ff .45 Ministere de l’Air, Paris-Le Bourget 19.10.45/47 struck-off Register 14.1.47 _________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 NC.701 F-BAJY Ministere de l’Air, Paris-Le Bourget 24.2.45 Martinet I (to Armee de l’Air as 4) _________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 NC.701 F-BAOF reg. (to Armee de l’Air as 7) _________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 NC.701 F-BAOG reg. (to Armee de l’Air as 8) _________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 NC.701 F-BAOH reg. (to Armee de l’Air as 9) _________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 NC.701 F-BAOI reg. (to Armee de
  • Airbus/EADS Sign a Titanium Supply Agreement with VSMPO-AVISMA, Integrated Structure of ‘Russian Technologies’

    Airbus/EADS Sign a Titanium Supply Agreement with VSMPO-AVISMA, Integrated Structure of ‘Russian Technologies’

    GDM 17/2009R 20th April 2009 Airbus/EADS sign a Titanium supply agreement with VSMPO-AVISMA, integrated structure of ‘Russian technologies’. Airbus/EADS and VSMPO-AVISMA boost their long-term relationship Airbus, the world’s leading aircraft manufacturer, its parent company EADS, a global leader in aerospace, defence and related services and The Russian Technologies State Corporation integrated structure VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation, the Russian Titanium manufacturer, have signed the biggest and longest-term contract in the history of Airbus/EADS cooperation with Russian industry. The agreement was signed today in Moscow by Sergey Chemezov, General Director of ‘Russian Technologies’ state corporation and Tom Enders, President and CEO of Airbus in the presence of Vladimir Putin, Russian Prime-Minister, Walter Jürgen Schmid, German Ambassador to Russia, Jean de Gliniasty, French Ambassador to Russia and Juan Antonio March Pujol, Spanish Ambassador to Russia. The agreement covers the supply of Titanium to Airbus and other EADS Divisions until 2020. The scope of the contract includes the supply of Titanium and covers die forging parts for all existing Airbus aircraft, including new programmes such as the A350XWB. VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation may also machine Titanium products in order to develop a vertically integrated Titanium supply chain, starting from raw materials to finished products. The contract comes as a confirmation of the framework agreement signed in July 2008 at Farnborough Airshow. The new agreement further boosts the relationship between the companies, which dates back to the early 1990s. It also enlarges Airbus’ cooperation with the Russian aviation industry, which currently includes production of components for Airbus at Russian plants, passenger to freighter aircraft conversions (P2F) and joint Research & Technology (R&T) projects.
  • La Formation Tome 1

    La Formation Tome 1

    COMAERO Un demi-siècle d’aéronautique en France La formation Tome 1 1 LE COMITÉ POUR L’HISTOIRE DE L’AÉRONAUTIQUE Au cours de la période 1945-1995, l'aéronautique française a vécu une aventure passionnante. Réduite à peu de choses au lendemain de la deuxième guerre mondiale, il lui fallait se reconstruire. C'est ce qu'elle a fait avec brio. Qu'il s'agisse des avions militaires, des avions civils, des hélicoptères, des missiles, des moteurs, des équipements, l'aéronautique française s'est retrouvée, en quelques décennies, à l'égal des meilleures. Elle est ainsi devenue capable de satisfaire, au niveau mondial, la plupart des besoins des utilisateurs civils et militaires. Cette réussite est due à des facteurs techniques, industriels, financiers et politiques. Elle est due, notamment, à une collaboration très étroite entre les futurs utilisateurs, les services techniques officiels, les organismes de formation et de recherche, les centres d'essais et les industriels, fournisseurs et clients étant mus par un même désir de renaissance et de réussite. C'est cette histoire que la collection d'ouvrages COMAERO veut retracer. Les rédacteurs de cette collection, membres du comité pour l'histoire de l'aéronautique (COMAERO), ont été ingénieurs d'études ou ingénieurs d'essais, puis directeurs de programme ou chefs de service, au cours de carrières particulièrement fécondes à la DGA et dans l’industrie. Au sein du comité COMAERO, ils ont effectué un travail de mémoire collectif, en faisant largement appel aux principaux acteurs des services étatiques et de l'industrie. Leur travail constitue un témoignage de l'œuvre accomplie en un demi-siècle qui a été profondément marqué par les progrès des techniques aérospatiales, intimement associés à ceux de l'électronique et de l'informatique.
  • EASA Type Rating and Licence Endorsement List Flight Crew – All Aircraft Excluding Helicopters 05 August 2021

    EASA Type Rating and Licence Endorsement List Flight Crew – All Aircraft Excluding Helicopters 05 August 2021

    EASA type rating and licence endorsement list flight crew – all aircraft excluding helicopters 05 August 2021 The EASA type rating and licence endorsement lists constitute the class and type of aircraft categorisations in accordance with FCL.010 (category of aircraft, class of aeroplane, and type of aircraft) and FCL.700 of Annex I (Part-FCL) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011, as well as in accordance with GM1 FCL.700. Furthermore, the lists provide aircraft-specific references relevant to flight crew qualifications and air operations. Additional information concerning these lists is provided in the associated explanatory notes. Manufacturer Aircraft Licence Variants Complex SP / OE GM / Remarks model / name endorsement SP HPA / OEB / MP OSD FC available All All powered sailplanes having TMG X ― SP Class rating TMG manufacturers an integrally mounted, non- Aircraft within the class retractable engine and a non- rating touring motor glider retractable propeller, capable (TMG) are not listed of taking off and climbing individually in this table, under its own power. unless specific provisions have been established. All Single-engine piston (land) SEP (land) X ― SP Class rating SEP (land) manufacturers Single-engine piston (land) Aircraft within the class with variable pitch propellers rating SEP (land) are not (VP) listed individually in this table, unless specific Single-engine piston (land) provisions have been with retractable undercarriage established. (RU) Single-engine piston (land) with turbo- / super-charged engines (T) Single-engine piston (land) with cabin pressurisation (P) Single-engine piston (land) with tail wheels (TW) Single-engine piston (land) with electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) Single-engine piston (land) with single lever power control (SLPC) All Single-engine turbo-prop SET X ― SP Class rating SET manufacturers engines All aircraft within the class rating SET are listed individually in this table and require EASA classification.