DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-19 Communication and Information Flow in Hard-To- Reach Areas of Borno State, Nigeria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COVID-19 Communication and Information Flow in Hard-To- Reach Areas of Borno State, Nigeria COVID-19 communication and information flow in hard-to- reach areas of Borno state, Nigeria. Accessibility and Assessment Coverage2: June - July 2020 CONTEXT AND INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS The continuation of conflict in Northeast Nigeria has created a complex • Findings suggest that information on COVID-19 has reached humanitarian crisis, rendering sections of Borno state as hard-to-reach H2R areas in Borno state to various extents. People from H2R (H2R) for humanitarian actors. Previous assessments illustrate how the settlements in Bama seemed to have received less information conflict continues to have severe consequences for people in H2R areas. (general information and COVID-19 specific information) In addition, the insecure situation, compounded by the general lack of compared to other assessed LGAs. In addition, across assessed access to basic services and infrastructure, leaves people living in H2R LGAs, women had reportedly less access to information than areas highly vulnerable to (the impact of) COVID-19. men. Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, communication on • Of the information received about COVID-19, the majority of KIs prevention, symptoms, and when to seek medical care is critical to reduce mentioned people in the settlements knew about the consequences transmission and mortality rates. Yet, particularly in H2R areas in Borno of the virus (primarily death). However, with a reported need state, access to means and sources of information is likely to be severely for information about prevention and treatment, these findings limited. Although assessments conducted by REACH have indicated an might highlight an information gap, indicating that COVID-19 increase in COVID-19 related knowledge among people living in H2R specific information does not consistently reach H2R areas. areas, findings also show that options to communicate with people in H2R areas are incredibly limited, preventing the circulation of COVID-19 • Radio was a commonly reported source of information 2 information. To strengthen the evidence base on how information that also seemed to be generally trusted by people in H2R (particularly related to COVID-19) is accessed, understood, and used settlements. However, several KIs reported that radios were by people living in Borno’s H2R areas, REACH conducted a qualitative prohibited in their settlements, raising concerns about adequate assessment on communication and information sharing from June to July access to information for people in those settlements. Although 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic. radios were reported to be generally trusted, a considerable number of KIs reported that people did not trust COVID-19 This brief is divided into two sections. The first section describe the types specific information they received, regardless of whether the of information (general and COVID-19 specific) reportedly received by information was received via the radio or through other sources people living in H2R settlements as well as information needs, trust and of information. sources of information. Following from this, the second section focuses on how people in H2R settlements reportedly used COVID-19 specific • Besides a reported need for more COVID-19 specific information, particularly how they may have changed their behaviour on information, most KIs mentioned a general need for more the basis of the information they received. information, especially about how to safely leave the H2R settlements and how to access food and other basic services. The findings presented in this brief are derived from 30 in-depth interviews with key informants (KIs) from H2R settlements in Adabam, • Overall, many KIs described the context in which people live Bama, Damboa, and Gwoza local government areas (LGAs). Findings to be more pressing than the COVID-19 pandemic, which might are indicative only of the lived experiences of people in these settlements. indicate that practicing preventive measures is not always a high For additional information on the sampling strategy and methodology, priority for people in settlements facing resources stress. please refer to the Terms of Reference and the dedicated “Methodology note” on page 5. • Findings indicated that when people did receive COVID-19 Map 1: Areas assessed specific information, many of them adapted their behaviour to some extent, trying to protect themselves from getting infected. Niger Abadam Chad Mobbar Kukawa Guzamala Gubio ”They said there is a disease that is killing people, Monguno Nganzai Marte Nigerians, (it) is killing them” Yobe Borno Magumeri Ngala “... (it) is killing them all, you will just die. There is no Jere Mafa Kala/Balge Dikwa Maiduguri male, female, children, adult, old and young, it kills Kaga Konduga Bama all... and there is no cure.“ Gwoza Damboa Cameroon Quote by Female KI from Gwoza (between 18 and 35 years old) Chibok Biu describing the information people in H2R settlements had received Askira/Uba Kwaya Kusar about COVID-19. Hawul Gombe Bayo Shani Adamawa State boundary Unassessed LGA's Assessed LGA's For more information on this brief, please contact Informing [email protected] more effective REACH humanitarian action COVID-19 communication and information flow in hard-to- reach areas of Borno state, Nigeria. June - July 2020 1 INFORMATION FLOW AND NEEDS The majority of KIs (18) described that people in the H2R settlements had received information about the consequences of COVID-19 and 17 KIs 1.1 INFORMATION RECEIVED reported that people were commonly aware that death was a potential consequence (see quote above). Information about COVID-19 related All KIs (30) across all LGAs mentioned that people in the H2R settlements consequences were mostly described by KIs from Gwoza and Bama (14). received some kind of information. Overall, the KIs mentioned 10 different kinds of information, which primarily included information related to Some KIs (14) also mentioned that people in the settlements had received conditions outside the settlements, serving as possible pull or push information about COVID-19 prevention. It was primarily KIs from factors for leaving the settlements. In this regard, the majority of the Damboa and Abadam that mentioned that people in their settlements KIs (mentioned by 21 KIs) reported that people in H2R settlements had had received information about COVID-19 prevention, which included received information about services provided in camps and garrison information about isolation of sick people, covering of eyes and mouth towns. Around half of KIs (16) mentioned that people had received (9) and frequent hand-washing (11). A few KIs (3) from Abadam further information on how to leave the H2R settlements, including risks and mentioned that people in the H2R settlements had heard that they should benefits associated with leaving. Benefits included an assurance that wear masks and gloves. None of the KIs from Bama reported that people people could leave the settlement without getting harmed (6), whereas had received information about symptoms, whereas information about risks included information that people leaving the settlements would be symptoms was mentioned by at least one KI from all other LGAs (9). killed, imprisoned or separated from their family members (10). Some The information reportedly received about symptoms included fever (5), KIs (5), most of whom reported on H2R settlements in Gwoza, mentioned coughing (6) and cold related symptoms such as sneezing (4). that people in H2R settlements had received information about both risks and benefits of leaving the settlement. This contrast could indicate 1.2 INFORMATION NEEDS a difference in the information received within the settlements but could In addition to the information received by people living in H2R areas, KIs also illustrate the uncertainty and shifting context in H2R settlements in were asked about people’s information needs. Similar to the reported Gwoza impacting the information shared about leaving the settlements. information reportedly received by people in H2R areas, the information needs mentioned by most KIs included information about how to leave Interestingly, 19 KIs also mentioned that people in the H2R settlement the settlement (18) and information about humanitarian assistance (13). had received information about a new infectious disease in the garrison Compared to Adabam and Damboa, a relatively high number of KIs in towns, and although not every KI was able to name the disease, it seemed Gwoza (7) and Bama (8) reported information needs related to how to clear to be COVID-19 (see quote below). leave the H2R settlements, which might indicate a strained situation and perceived difficulties migrating from H2R settlements in these specific LGAs. “Yes, the information... a disease... it’s name is… me too I don’t know... it started in china, it is just killing Potentially reflecting people’s concerns and the ongoing conflict, some people…that too, was explained to us.” KIs (9) reported people’s biggest information need to be information Female KI, between 18 and 35 years old, Gwoza about peace. In addition, a few KIs (7) also mentioned that people in the settlements had a desire to get information about the condition of relatives Almost half (12) of the KIs across all LGAs mentioned that different in garrison towns and other settlements. population groups had different level of access to information. As illustrated in the quote below, this primarily included women not having When KIs were asked directly if
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sambisa Final Draftnh
    Total Aerial Count of Elephants and other Wildlife Species in Sambisa Game Reserve in Borno State, Nigeria By P. Omondi1, R. Mayienda2, Mamza, J.S.3, M.S. Massalatchi4 All correspondences E-mail: [email protected] JULY 2006 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 OBJECTIVES OF THE SURVEY .................................................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREA..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 SOIL................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 FLORA & FAUNA .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monguno Bama Gwoza
    DTM Flash Report Windstorm and rainfall damages to IDP sites Nigeria IOM DTM Rapid Assessment Monguno, Bama and Gwoza LGAs (Local Government Areas) 24 June 2021 SUMMARY PP PPPP 200 Households 671 Individuals 3 sites 130 Damaged shelters 11 Damaged toilets 8 Damaged shower points With the onset of the rainy season in Nigeria’s conflict-affected Kukawa Guzamala northeastern state of Borno, varying degrees of damages are expected to GGSS 431 Camp Gubio ± infrastructures (self-made and constructed) in camps and camp-like settings. Usually, heavy rainfalls are accompanied by strong winds Nganzai Monguno causing serious damage to shelters of IDPs. Marte Between 17 and 23 June 2021, IOM’s DTM programme carried out Ngala assessments to ascertain the level of damage sustained in camps and Magumeri camp-like settings due to heavy windstorms and rainfall. Overall, 2 Kala/Balge Mafa Jere camps and 1 collective settlement in the LGAs Monguno, Bama and Dikwa Gwoza LGAs were assessed. The worst-hit of the camps assessed was Maiduguri Goverment Girls Secondary School (GGSS) camp in Monguno LGA where a heavy rainfall damaged 33 shelters, affecting an estimated 431 GSSSS camp individuals. Konduga 225 Bama In total, 130 shelters were damaged by storms, leaving a total of 200 households without shelter. Additionally, a total of 11 toilets and 8 Gwoza showers were damaged by storms. There was no casualty as a result of 20 Housing XXX Affected population Damboa 15 Camp the storms. Per Location LGA Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China 0 5 10 20 30 40 Affected LGAs (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Miles Community, Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community The maps in this report are for illustra�on purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Through Nigeria's Six-Year
    “When We Can’t See the Enemy, Civilians Become the Enemy” Living Through Nigeria’s Six-Year Insurgency About the Report This report explores the experiences of civilians and armed actors living through the conflict in northeastern Nigeria. The ultimate goal is to better understand the gaps in protection from all sides, how civilians perceive security actors, and what communities expect from those who are supposed to protect them from harm. With this understanding, we analyze the structural impediments to protecting civilians, and propose practical—and locally informed—solutions to improve civilian protection and response to the harm caused by all armed actors in this conflict. About Center for Civilians in Conflict Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) works to improve protection for civil- ians caught in conflicts around the world. We call on and advise international organizations, governments, militaries, and armed non-state actors to adopt and implement policies to prevent civilian harm. When civilians are harmed we advocate the provision of amends and post-harm assistance. We bring the voices of civilians themselves to those making decisions affecting their lives. The organization was founded as Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a courageous humanitarian killed by a suicide bomber in 2005 while advocating for Iraqi families. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] www.civiliansinconflict.org © 2015 Center for Civilians in Conflict “When We Can’t See the Enemy, Civilians Become the Enemy” Living Through Nigeria’s Six-Year Insurgency This report was authored by Kyle Dietrich, Senior Program Manager for Africa and Peacekeeping at CIVIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Adamawa and Borno - COVID-19 Risk Related Indicators
    Adamawa and Borno - COVID-19 Risk Related Indicators Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria August 2020 Introduction Methodology The continuation of conflict in Northeast Nigeria has created a Using its Area of Knowledge (AoK) method, on settlement-wide circumstances in H2R areas. Results presented in this factsheet, unless complex humanitarian crisis, rendering sections of Borno and REACH monitors the situation in H2R areas Responses from KIs reporting on the same otherwise specified, represent the proportion of Adamawa states as hard to reach (H2R) for humanitarian actors. remotely through monthly multisector interviews in settlement are then aggregated to the settlement settlements assessed within a LGA. Findings Previous assessments illustrate how the conflict continues to accessible Local Government Area (LGA) capitals. level. The most common response provided by are only reported on LGAs where at least 5% of have severe consequences for people in H2R areas. People REACH interviews key informants (KIs) who 1) the greatest number of KIs is reported for each populated settlements and at least 5 settlements living in H2R areas, who are already facing severe and extreme are recently arrived internally displaced persons settlement. When no most common response in the respective LGA have been assessed. The humanitarian needs, are also vulnerable to the spread of (IDPs) who have left a H2R settlement in the last 3 could be identified, the response is considered as findings presented are indicative of broader trends COVID-19, especially due to the lack of health care services months, or 2) have been in contact with someone ‘no consensus’. While included in the calculations, in assessed settlements in August 2020, and are and information sources.
    [Show full text]
  • How Boko Haram Became the Islamic State's West Africa
    HOW BOKO HARAM BECAME THE ISLAMIC STATE’S WEST AFRICA PROVINCE J. Peter Pham ven before it burst into the headlines with its brazen April 2014 abduction of nearly three hundred schoolgirls from the town of Chibok in Nigeria’s northeast- Eern Borno State, sparking an unprecedented amount of social media communica- tion in the process, the Nigerian militant group Boko Haram had already distinguished itself as one of the fastest evolving of its kind, undergoing several major transformations in just over half a decade. In a very short period of time, the group went from being a small militant band focused on localized concerns and using relatively low levels of violence to a significant terrorist organization with a clearer jihadist ideology to a major insurgency seizing and holding large swathes of territory that was dubbed “the most deadly terrorist group in the world” by the Institute for Economics and Peace, based on the sheer number of deaths it caused in 2014.1 More recently, Boko Haram underwent another evolution with its early 2015 pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State and its subsequent rebranding as the “Islamic State West Africa Province” (ISWAP). The ideological, rhetorical, and operational choices made by Boko shifted consider- ably in each of these iterations, as did its tactics. Indeed the nexus between these three elements—ideology, rhetoric, and operations—is the key to correctly interpreting Boko Haram’s strategic objectives at each stage in its evolution, and to eventually countering its pursuit of these goals. Boko Haram 1.0 The emergence of the militant group that would become known as Boko Haram cannot be understood without reference to the social, religious, economic, and political milieu of J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwoza 1917 987 4239 Bama 2143 1026 5250 Mobbar 1212 411
    IDPs DATA S.O.E STATES BORNO, YOBE AND ADAMAWA FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, 2014 TOTAL - 129,624 77,077 37,870 244,070 5,376 249,446 3,161,887 Number of IDPs living Number of Number Of Number of Number of with host IDPs in Total Number Total Affected STATE LGA Affected Children Women Men families Camps of IDPs Population Date of ocuranceNature of Disaster Borno GWOZA 1917 1335 987 4239 4,239 276,568 11/01/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 2143 2081 1026 5250 5,250 270,119 13/01/2014 INSURGENCY MOBBAR 1212 727 411 2350 2,809 5,159 116,631 24/01/2014 INSURGENCY JERE 891 606 367 1864 1,864 209 24/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 97 88 24 209 209 233,200 26/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 118 113 38 269 567 836 836 26/01/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 330 287 131 748 748 748 22/01/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 1206 592 313 2111 2,111 157,322 02/02/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 1511 1007 603 3121 3,121 3,121 05/02/2014 INSURGENCY GWOZA 1723 1215 805 3743 3,743 3,743 13/02/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 2343 2099 1036 5478 5,478 5,478 14/02/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 65 67 30 162 162 162 14/02/2014 INSURGENCY GWOZA 4403 2423 1309 8135 8,135 8,135 19/02/2014 INSURGENCY BAMA 2398 1804 911 5113 5,113 5,113 20/02/2014 INSURGENCY MMC 2289 1802 900 4991 4,991 4,991 01/03/2014 INSURGENCY KAGA 1201 582 303 2086 2,086 89,996 01/03/2014 INSURGENCY MAFA 2015 913 568 3496 3,496 3,496 02/03/2014 INSURGENCY KONDUGA 1428 838 513 2779 2,779 2,779 03/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 2437 2055 1500 5992 5,992 5,992 04/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 170 133 57 360 360 360 05/03/2014 INSURGENCY DAMBOA 406 343 211 960 960 960 06/03/2014
    [Show full text]
  • FEWS NET Special Report: a Famine Likely Occurred in Bama LGA and May Be Ongoing in Inaccessible Areas of Borno State
    December 13, 2016 A Famine likely occurred in Bama LGA and may be ongoing in inaccessible areas of Borno State This report summarizes an IPC-compatible analysis of Local Government Areas (LGAs) and select IDP concentrations in Borno State, Nigeria. The conclusions of this report have been endorsed by the IPC’s Emergency Review Committee. This analysis follows a July 2016 multi-agency alert, which warned of Famine, and builds off of the October 2016 Cadre Harmonisé analysis, which concluded that additional, more detailed analysis of Borno was needed given the elevated risk of Famine. KEY MESSAGES A Famine likely occurred in Bama and Banki towns during 2016, and in surrounding rural areas where conditions are likely to have been similar, or worse. Although this conclusion cannot be fully verified, a preponderance of the available evidence, including a representative mortality survey, suggests that Famine (IPC Phase 5) occurred in Bama LGA during 2016, when the vast majority of the LGA’s remaining population was concentrated in Bama Town and Banki Town. Analysis indicates that at least 2,000 Famine-related deaths may have occurred in Bama LGA between January and September, many of them young children. Famine may have also occurred in other parts of Borno State that were inaccessible during 2016, but not enough data is available to make this determination. While assistance has improved conditions in accessible areas of Borno State, a Famine may be ongoing in inaccessible areas where conditions could be similar to those observed in Bama LGA earlier this year. Significant assistance in Bama Town (since July) and in Banki Town (since August/September) has contributed to a reduction in mortality and the prevalence of acute malnutrition, though these improvements are tenuous and depend on the continued delivery of assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Update to the IMB Nigeria
    Progress in Polio Eradication Initiative in Nigeria: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies 16th Independent Monitoring Board Meeting 1 November 2017 London 0 Outline 1. Epidemiology 2. Challenges and Mitigation strategies SIAs Surveillance Routine Immunization 3. Summary and way forward 1 Epidemiology 2 Polio Viruses in Nigeria, 2015-2017 Past 24 months Past 12 months 3 Nigeria has gone 13 months without Wild Polio Virus and 11 months without cVDPV2 13 months without WPV 11 months – cVDPV2 4 Challenges and Mitigation strategies 5 SIAs 6 Before the onset of the Wild Polio Virus Outbreak in July 2016, there were several unreached settlements in Borno Borno Accessibility Status by Ward, March 2016 # of Wards in % Partially LGAs % Fully Accessible % Inaccessible LGA Accessible Abadam 10 0% 0% 100% Askira-Uba 13 100% 0% 0% Bama 14 14% 0% 86% Bayo 10 100% 0% 0% Biu 11 91% 9% 0% Chibok 11 100% 0% 0% Damboa 10 20% 0% 80% Dikwa 10 10% 0% 90% Gubio 10 50% 10% 40% Guzamala 10 0% 0% 100% Gwoza 13 8% 8% 85% Hawul 12 83% 17% 0% Jere 12 50% 50% 0% Kaga 15 0% 7% 93% Kala-Balge 10 0% 0% 100% Konduga 11 0% 64% 36% Kukawa 10 20% 0% 80% Kwaya Kusar 10 100% 0% 0% Mafa 12 8% 0% 92% Magumeri 13 100% 0% 0% Maiduguri 15 100% 0% 0% Marte 13 0% 0% 100% Mobbar 10 0% 0% 100% Monguno 12 8% 0% 92% Ngala 11 0% 0% 100% Nganzai 12 17% 0% 83% Shani 11 100% 0% 0% State 311 41% 6% 53% 7 Source: Borno EOC Data team analysis Four Strategies were deployed to expand polio vaccination reach and increase population immunity in Borno state SIAs RES2 RIC4 Special interventions 12
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE Progress on Key Activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy
    AID WORKERS ARE #NOTATARGET NORTH-EAST NIGERIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE Progress on key activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy JANUARY 2020 EDITION (covering 1 November - 31 December 2019) NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 North-East Nigeria Humanitarian Situation Update, January 2020 Edition - Update on key activities from the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy. Reporting period: 1 November - 31 December 2019 Publication date: 14 February 2020 The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to coordinate the global emergency response to save lives and protect people in humanitarian crises. We advocate for effective and principled humanitarian action by all, for all. OCHA produces these reports in collaboration with humanitarian partners. This report covers mainly activities that are part of the 2019-2021 Humanitarian Response Strategy (HRP) for Borno, Adamawa and Yobe states in north-east Nigeria. Please note that humanitarian partners monitor their activities through dozens of key performance indicators (KPIs) in addition to those presented here. The KPIs tracked in this report were selected for their significance out of the overall 2019 HRS monitoring framework. For more information, please visit unocha.org/nigeria and reliefweb.int/country/nga. To sign up for our mailing list: bit.ly/NigeriaUpdates. Contacts: Edem Wosornu Peter Ekayu Head of Office, OCHA Nigeria, Abuja Deputy Head of Office, OCHA Nigeria, Maiduguri [email protected] [email protected] +2349037810140 +2349037810095 2 NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 ACCESS BY INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN ORGANISATIONS 3 NORTH-EAST NIGERIA: HUMANITARIAN SITUATION UPDATE | 1 November - 31 December 2019 OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW In the months of November and December, rising insecurity to locations along the Maiduguri – Monguno and Maiduguri – Damaturu road continued to impede the delivery of life-saving aid.
    [Show full text]
  • ETT Report No.107
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria DTM Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL (ETT) DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up-to-date information on sudden displacement and other population movements ETT Report: No. 107 | 18 - 24 February 2019 Movements New Arrival Screening by Nutri�on Partners Abadam Arrivals: Children (6-59 months) Niger Lake Chad 1,505 individuals screened for malnutri�on 23 Kukawa 199 Mobbar MUAC category of screened children Departures: Guzamala 101 individuals Green: 174 Yellow: 19 Red: 6 Gubio Monguno Within the period of 18 - 24 February 2019, a total of 1,606 movements were Nganzai recorded, including 1,505 arrivals and 101 departures. Arrivals were recorded at Marte Ngala loca�ons in Askira/Uba, Bama, Chibok, Damboa, Gwoza, Jere, Konduga, Magumeri Maiduguri 283 Maiduguri, Mobbar and Ngala Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno state and 36 9 Jere Mafa loca�ons in Demsa, Fufore, Maiha and Numan LGAs of Adamawa state. Dikwa Kala/Balge Departures were recorded at Askira/Uba LGA of Borno state and Demsa, Fufore, Borno Konduga Maiha and Numan LGAs of Adamawa state. Kaga ETT assessments iden�fied the following movement triggers: ongoing conflict 564 Bama 76 (53%), voluntary reloca�on (27%), poor living condi�ons (8%), fear of a�acks (8%), improved security (3%), and military opera�ons (1%) Gwoza 23 Damboa 39 Number of individuals by movement triggers Cameroon Chibok 7 Biu Madagali Conflict 856 Askira/Uba Michika Voluntary reloca�on 439 Kwaya Kusar 19 Bayo Hawul 308 Mubi North Fear of a�ack 128
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021
    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 206 8.7 2.9 308,000 12.8 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Estimated Number of Estimated Estimated Projected Acutely Population People in Need in Number of IDPs Number of Food-Insecure w of Nigeria Northeast Nigeria in Nigeria Nigerian Refugees Population for 2021 in West Africa Lean Season UN – December 2020 UN – February 2021 UNHCR – February 2021 UNHCR – April 2021 CH – March 2021 Major OAG attacks on population centers in northeastern Nigeria—including Borno State’s Damasak town and Yobe State’s Geidam town—have displaced hundreds of thousands of people since late March. Intercommunal violence and OCG activity continue to drive displacement and exacerbate needs in northwest Nigeria. Approximately 12.8 million people will require emergency food assistance during the June-to-August lean season, representing a significant deterioration of food security in Nigeria compared with 2020. 1 TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA $230,973,400 For the Nigeria Response in FY 2021 State/PRM2 $13,500,000 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 7 Total $244,473,400 1 USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 U.S. Department of State Bureau for Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 1 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Violence Drives Displacement and Constrains Access in the Northeast Organized armed group (OAG) attacks in Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe states have displaced more than 200,000 people since March and continue to exacerbate humanitarian needs and limit relief efforts, according to the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Factsheet *Response Analysis from January - June 2019 5W Data Collection June 2019
    Monthly Factsheet *Response analysis from January - June 2019 5W data collection June 2019 Abadam Yusufari Yunusari Machina Mobbar Kukawa Lake Chad Nguru Karasuwa Guzamala Bade Bursari Geidam Gubio Bade Monguno Nganzai Jakusko 721,268 Marte Tarmua Ngala Magumeri Mafa Kala/Balge Yobe Jere Fune Dikwa Nangere Damaturu Borno Maiduguri Potiskum 145 Kaga Konduga Bama PICTURE Fika Gujba Gwoza Damboa 111,445 Gulani Chibok Biu Madagali Askira/Uba Kwaya Michika Kusar Hawul Mubi Bayo Hong North Beneficiaries Shani Gombi Mubi South 224,266 Maiha Photo Credit: Kolawole Girls Makeshift/ selfmade shelters, Shuwari 5 camp, Maiduguri, Borno. Adewale (OCHA) 36,138 Guyuk Song Shelleng 11,098 Lamurde 183,505 Girei Boys 29,822 Numan Demsa Yola 2019 Response Highlights Yola South North Mayo-Belwa Shelter Interventions 22,612 households have received emergency shelter solutions while 4,385 167,244 Fufore Women 25,194 households received reinforced/transitional shelter solutions. 5,140 Non-food Item interventions Jada DMS/CCCM Activities 23,346 households reached through improved, basic and complimentary NFI Men 134,102 20,010 Lake Chad Ganye kits. Inaccessible Areas 23,249 Elderly Shelter NFI Beneficiaries 76,031 eligible individuals biometrically registered since January 2019. 5,566 Adamawa Toungo CCCM Beneficiaries ESNFI & CCCM activity 1,500 households reached through Cash/Voucher for Shelter support. No Activity June 2019 Summary - Arrival Movements 1,305 CCCM Shelter/NFI 1,149 10,153 3,753 Arrivals Departures 897 869 737 730 *graph shows only arrivals of more
    [Show full text]