DOCSLIB.ORG

Adamawa and Borno - Food Security and Livelihoods (FSL) Assessment of Hard-To-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria July 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adamawa and Borno - Food Security and Livelihoods (FSL) Assessment of Hard-To-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria July 2020 Adamawa and Borno - Food Security and Livelihoods (FSL) Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria July 2020 Overview The continuation of conflict in Northeast Nigeria has in accessible Local Government Area (LGA) capitals the same settlement are then aggregated to the The findings presented are indicative of broader created a complex humanitarian crisis, rendering with key informants (KIs) who either (1) are newly settlement level. The most common response trends in assessed settlements in July 2020, and sections of Borno state as hard to reach. To address arrived internally displaced persons (IDPs) who have provided by the greatest number of KIs is reported for are not statistically generalisable. information gaps facing the humanitarian response left a hard-to-reach settlement in the last 3 months each settlement. When no most common response Due to precautions related to the COVID-19 in Northeast Nigeria and inform humanitarian actors or (2) KIs who have had contact with someone living could be identified, the response is considered as ‘no outbreak, data was collected remotely through on the demographics of households in hard-to-reach or having been in a hard-to-reach settlement in the consensus’. While included in the calculations, the phone based interviews with assistance from local areas of Northeast Nigeria, as well as to identify their last month (traders, migrants, family members, etc.)1 percentage of settlements for which no consensus stakeholders. Data collection took place from June needs, access to services and movement intentions, was reached is not displayed in the results below. If not stated otherwise, the recall period for each 1st to June 30th. REACH has been conducting a monthly assessment question is set to one month prior to the last Results presented in this factsheet, unless otherwise of hard-to-reach areas in Northeast Nigeria since Assessment Coverage information the KI has had from the hard-to-reach specified, represent the proportion of settlements November 2018. area. Selected KIs are purposively sampled and assessed within an LGA. Findings are only reported 626 Key informants interviewed Using its Area of Knowledge (AoK) methodology, are interviewed on settlement-wide circumstances on LGAs where at least 5% of populated settlements 348 Settlements assessed REACH remotely monitors the situation in hard-to- in hard-to-reach areas, rather than their individual and at least 5 settlements in the respective LGA 22 LGAs assessed reach areas through monthly multi-sector interviews experiences. Responses from KIs reporting on have been assessed. 10 LGAs with sufficient coverage2 Assessment coverage Access to livelihoods Access to markets Proportion of settlements assessed: Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported that Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported that most people have access to their usual livelihood activity: people have access to a functional market within walking distance: LGA boundary LGA boundary 0% 0% Niger Abadam 1 - 20% 1 - 20% 21 - 40% Abadam 21 - 40% 41 - 60% 41 - 60% Chad Kukawa 61 - 80% 61 - 80% 81 - 100% Kukawa 81 - 100% Guzamala Assessed Settlement Guzamala Assessed Settlement Monguno Nganzai Monguno Marte Nganzai Yobe Marte Borno Ngala Ngala Mafa Kala/Balge Jere Dikwa Mafa Kala/Balge Jere Dikwa Konduga Bama Konduga Bama Cameroon State boundary Gwoza LGA boundary Damboa Gwoza Under 5% or less Damboa than 5 settlements Chibok Madagali 5 - 10% Chibok Madagali Askira/Uba 11 - 20% Michika Adamawa Gombe 21 - 50% Askira/Uba Michika 51 - 100% km km AssessedChad Settlement 0 25 50 100 0 25 50 100 1 Where possible, only KIs that have arrived very recently (0-3 weeks prior to data collection) were interviewed. 2 The most recent version of the VTS dataset (released in February 2019 on vts.eocng.org) has been used as the reference for settlement names and locations, and adjusted for deserted villages (OCHA 2020). For more information on this factsheet please contact: Informing REACH more effective [email protected] REACH humanitarian action Adamawa and Borno - Food Security and Livelihoods (FSL) Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria July 2020 Access to food and livelihoods Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported that Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported that people eat wild foods that are not part of their usual diet: that most people eat on average one meal per day or less: most people have less land available for cultivation compared to the same time in the previous year: LGA boundary LGA boundary LGA boundary 0% 0% 0% 1 - 20% 1 - 20% 1 - 20% Abadam Abadam Abadam 21 - 40% 21 - 40% 21 - 40% 41 - 60% 41 - 60% 41 - 60% 61 - 80% 61 - 80% 61 - 80% Kukawa Kukawa Kukawa 81 - 100% 81 - 100% 81 - 100% Guzamala Guzamala Guzamala Assessed Settlement Assessed Settlement Assessed Settlement Monguno Monguno Monguno Nganzai Nganzai Nganzai Marte Marte Marte Ngala Ngala Ngala Mafa Kala/Balge Mafa Kala/Balge Mafa Kala/Balge Jere Dikwa Jere Dikwa Jere Dikwa Konduga Konduga Konduga Bama Bama Bama Gwoza Gwoza Gwoza Damboa Damboa Damboa Chibok Chibok Chibok Madagali Madagali Madagali Askira/Uba Askira/Uba Askira/Uba Michika Michika Michika km km km 0 25 50 100 0 25 50 100 0 25 50 100 Most commonly reported main sources of food, by % of Proportion of assessed settlements where it was reported Livelihoods activities practiced in the settlement, by % of assessed settlements: that at least one community member planted and harvested assessed settlements: in the previous rainy season, per assessed LGA: For more information on this factsheet please contact: Informing REACH more effective [email protected] REACH humanitarian action.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adamawa and Borno - COVID-19 Risk Related Indicators
    Adamawa and Borno - COVID-19 Risk Related Indicators Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in Northeast Nigeria August 2020 Introduction Methodology The continuation of conflict in Northeast Nigeria has created a Using its Area of Knowledge (AoK) method, on settlement-wide circumstances in H2R areas. Results presented in this factsheet, unless complex humanitarian crisis, rendering sections of Borno and REACH monitors the situation in H2R areas Responses from KIs reporting on the same otherwise specified, represent the proportion of Adamawa states as hard to reach (H2R) for humanitarian actors. remotely through monthly multisector interviews in settlement are then aggregated to the settlement settlements assessed within a LGA. Findings Previous assessments illustrate how the conflict continues to accessible Local Government Area (LGA) capitals. level. The most common response provided by are only reported on LGAs where at least 5% of have severe consequences for people in H2R areas. People REACH interviews key informants (KIs) who 1) the greatest number of KIs is reported for each populated settlements and at least 5 settlements living in H2R areas, who are already facing severe and extreme are recently arrived internally displaced persons settlement. When no most common response in the respective LGA have been assessed. The humanitarian needs, are also vulnerable to the spread of (IDPs) who have left a H2R settlement in the last 3 could be identified, the response is considered as findings presented are indicative of broader trends COVID-19, especially due to the lack of health care services months, or 2) have been in contact with someone ‘no consensus’. While included in the calculations, in assessed settlements in August 2020, and are and information sources.
    [Show full text]
  • How Boko Haram Became the Islamic State's West Africa
    HOW BOKO HARAM BECAME THE ISLAMIC STATE’S WEST AFRICA PROVINCE J. Peter Pham ven before it burst into the headlines with its brazen April 2014 abduction of nearly three hundred schoolgirls from the town of Chibok in Nigeria’s northeast- Eern Borno State, sparking an unprecedented amount of social media communica- tion in the process, the Nigerian militant group Boko Haram had already distinguished itself as one of the fastest evolving of its kind, undergoing several major transformations in just over half a decade. In a very short period of time, the group went from being a small militant band focused on localized concerns and using relatively low levels of violence to a significant terrorist organization with a clearer jihadist ideology to a major insurgency seizing and holding large swathes of territory that was dubbed “the most deadly terrorist group in the world” by the Institute for Economics and Peace, based on the sheer number of deaths it caused in 2014.1 More recently, Boko Haram underwent another evolution with its early 2015 pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State and its subsequent rebranding as the “Islamic State West Africa Province” (ISWAP). The ideological, rhetorical, and operational choices made by Boko shifted consider- ably in each of these iterations, as did its tactics. Indeed the nexus between these three elements—ideology, rhetoric, and operations—is the key to correctly interpreting Boko Haram’s strategic objectives at each stage in its evolution, and to eventually countering its pursuit of these goals. Boko Haram 1.0 The emergence of the militant group that would become known as Boko Haram cannot be understood without reference to the social, religious, economic, and political milieu of J.
    [Show full text]
  • FEWS NET Special Report: a Famine Likely Occurred in Bama LGA and May Be Ongoing in Inaccessible Areas of Borno State
    December 13, 2016 A Famine likely occurred in Bama LGA and may be ongoing in inaccessible areas of Borno State This report summarizes an IPC-compatible analysis of Local Government Areas (LGAs) and select IDP concentrations in Borno State, Nigeria. The conclusions of this report have been endorsed by the IPC’s Emergency Review Committee. This analysis follows a July 2016 multi-agency alert, which warned of Famine, and builds off of the October 2016 Cadre Harmonisé analysis, which concluded that additional, more detailed analysis of Borno was needed given the elevated risk of Famine. KEY MESSAGES A Famine likely occurred in Bama and Banki towns during 2016, and in surrounding rural areas where conditions are likely to have been similar, or worse. Although this conclusion cannot be fully verified, a preponderance of the available evidence, including a representative mortality survey, suggests that Famine (IPC Phase 5) occurred in Bama LGA during 2016, when the vast majority of the LGA’s remaining population was concentrated in Bama Town and Banki Town. Analysis indicates that at least 2,000 Famine-related deaths may have occurred in Bama LGA between January and September, many of them young children. Famine may have also occurred in other parts of Borno State that were inaccessible during 2016, but not enough data is available to make this determination. While assistance has improved conditions in accessible areas of Borno State, a Famine may be ongoing in inaccessible areas where conditions could be similar to those observed in Bama LGA earlier this year. Significant assistance in Bama Town (since July) and in Banki Town (since August/September) has contributed to a reduction in mortality and the prevalence of acute malnutrition, though these improvements are tenuous and depend on the continued delivery of assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Update to the IMB Nigeria
    Progress in Polio Eradication Initiative in Nigeria: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies 16th Independent Monitoring Board Meeting 1 November 2017 London 0 Outline 1. Epidemiology 2. Challenges and Mitigation strategies SIAs Surveillance Routine Immunization 3. Summary and way forward 1 Epidemiology 2 Polio Viruses in Nigeria, 2015-2017 Past 24 months Past 12 months 3 Nigeria has gone 13 months without Wild Polio Virus and 11 months without cVDPV2 13 months without WPV 11 months – cVDPV2 4 Challenges and Mitigation strategies 5 SIAs 6 Before the onset of the Wild Polio Virus Outbreak in July 2016, there were several unreached settlements in Borno Borno Accessibility Status by Ward, March 2016 # of Wards in % Partially LGAs % Fully Accessible % Inaccessible LGA Accessible Abadam 10 0% 0% 100% Askira-Uba 13 100% 0% 0% Bama 14 14% 0% 86% Bayo 10 100% 0% 0% Biu 11 91% 9% 0% Chibok 11 100% 0% 0% Damboa 10 20% 0% 80% Dikwa 10 10% 0% 90% Gubio 10 50% 10% 40% Guzamala 10 0% 0% 100% Gwoza 13 8% 8% 85% Hawul 12 83% 17% 0% Jere 12 50% 50% 0% Kaga 15 0% 7% 93% Kala-Balge 10 0% 0% 100% Konduga 11 0% 64% 36% Kukawa 10 20% 0% 80% Kwaya Kusar 10 100% 0% 0% Mafa 12 8% 0% 92% Magumeri 13 100% 0% 0% Maiduguri 15 100% 0% 0% Marte 13 0% 0% 100% Mobbar 10 0% 0% 100% Monguno 12 8% 0% 92% Ngala 11 0% 0% 100% Nganzai 12 17% 0% 83% Shani 11 100% 0% 0% State 311 41% 6% 53% 7 Source: Borno EOC Data team analysis Four Strategies were deployed to expand polio vaccination reach and increase population immunity in Borno state SIAs RES2 RIC4 Special interventions 12
    [Show full text]
  • ETT Report No.107
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX - Nigeria DTM Nigeria EMERGENCY TRACKING TOOL (ETT) DTM Emergency Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up-to-date information on sudden displacement and other population movements ETT Report: No. 107 | 18 - 24 February 2019 Movements New Arrival Screening by Nutri�on Partners Abadam Arrivals: Children (6-59 months) Niger Lake Chad 1,505 individuals screened for malnutri�on 23 Kukawa 199 Mobbar MUAC category of screened children Departures: Guzamala 101 individuals Green: 174 Yellow: 19 Red: 6 Gubio Monguno Within the period of 18 - 24 February 2019, a total of 1,606 movements were Nganzai recorded, including 1,505 arrivals and 101 departures. Arrivals were recorded at Marte Ngala loca�ons in Askira/Uba, Bama, Chibok, Damboa, Gwoza, Jere, Konduga, Magumeri Maiduguri 283 Maiduguri, Mobbar and Ngala Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno state and 36 9 Jere Mafa loca�ons in Demsa, Fufore, Maiha and Numan LGAs of Adamawa state. Dikwa Kala/Balge Departures were recorded at Askira/Uba LGA of Borno state and Demsa, Fufore, Borno Konduga Maiha and Numan LGAs of Adamawa state. Kaga ETT assessments iden�fied the following movement triggers: ongoing conflict 564 Bama 76 (53%), voluntary reloca�on (27%), poor living condi�ons (8%), fear of a�acks (8%), improved security (3%), and military opera�ons (1%) Gwoza 23 Damboa 39 Number of individuals by movement triggers Cameroon Chibok 7 Biu Madagali Conflict 856 Askira/Uba Michika Voluntary reloca�on 439 Kwaya Kusar 19 Bayo Hawul 308 Mubi North Fear of a�ack 128
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021
    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Nigeria – Complex Emergency JUNE 7, 2021 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 206 8.7 2.9 308,000 12.8 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Estimated Number of Estimated Estimated Projected Acutely Population People in Need in Number of IDPs Number of Food-Insecure w of Nigeria Northeast Nigeria in Nigeria Nigerian Refugees Population for 2021 in West Africa Lean Season UN – December 2020 UN – February 2021 UNHCR – February 2021 UNHCR – April 2021 CH – March 2021 Major OAG attacks on population centers in northeastern Nigeria—including Borno State’s Damasak town and Yobe State’s Geidam town—have displaced hundreds of thousands of people since late March. Intercommunal violence and OCG activity continue to drive displacement and exacerbate needs in northwest Nigeria. Approximately 12.8 million people will require emergency food assistance during the June-to-August lean season, representing a significant deterioration of food security in Nigeria compared with 2020. 1 TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA $230,973,400 For the Nigeria Response in FY 2021 State/PRM2 $13,500,000 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 7 Total $244,473,400 1 USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 U.S. Department of State Bureau for Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 1 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Violence Drives Displacement and Constrains Access in the Northeast Organized armed group (OAG) attacks in Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe states have displaced more than 200,000 people since March and continue to exacerbate humanitarian needs and limit relief efforts, according to the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement Plan
    PROCUREMENT PLAN (Textual Part) Project information: Country: Nigeria Public Disclosure Authorized Project Name: Multi-Sectoral Crisis Recovery Project for North East Nigeria (MCRP) P- Number: P157891 Project Implementation Agency: MCRP PCU (Federal and States) Date of the Procurement Plan: Updated -December 22, 2017. Period covered by this Procurement Plan: From 01/12/2018 – 30/06/2019. Public Disclosure Authorized Preamble In accordance with paragraph 5.9 of the “World Bank Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers” (July 2016) (“Procurement Regulations”) the Bank’s Systematic Tracking and Exchanges in Procurement (STEP) system will be used to prepare, clear and update Procurement Plans and conduct all procurement transactions for the Project. This textual part along with the Procurement Plan tables in STEP constitute the Procurement Plan for the Project. The following conditions apply to all procurement activities in the Procurement Plan. The other elements of the Procurement Plan as required under paragraph 4.4 of the Procurement Regulations are set forth in STEP. Public Disclosure Authorized The Bank’s Standard Procurement Documents: shall be used for all contracts subject to international competitive procurement and those contracts as specified in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP. National Procurement Arrangements: In accordance with paragraph 5.3 of the Procurement Regulations, when approaching the national market (as specified in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP), the country’s own procurement procedures may be used. When the Borrower uses its own national open competitive procurement arrangements as set forth in the FGN Public Procurement Act 2007; such arrangements shall be subject to paragraph 5.4 of the Procurement Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th Meeting 6-7 May 2014
    Independent Monitoring Board GPEI 10th Meeting 6-7 May 2014 Nigeria Presentation 1 Outline of Presentation • WPV Epidemiology • Innovations and What we are Doing Differently • Quality Outcome Data • Threats to the Programme • Priorities for the next 3 months Steep Reduction of Polio Cases YTD As at April 25, 2014 Nigeria has:- 2013 • 2 confirmed WPV1 in 1 State compared to 14 cases in 7 States for the same period in 2013. o Date of onset of latest case is March 24, 2014 W1 (n=25) • There have been no confirmed W3 (n=0) # Infected States: 6 WPV3 since November 2012. 2014 • 1 confirmed circulating vaccine derived poliovirus (cVDPV2) in 1 State just as same period in 2013. W1 (n=2) W3 (n=0) # Infected State: 1 Total WPV Reduction from 2008 to Date 140 120 100 80 60 In 2014, we have recorded 2 cases Jan 40 to April. We have 3 cases never been so close. from Jan- 67% Reduction 20 April 2010 0 WPV1 WPV3 Jan- Apr: Wild Polio Virus: Infected LGAs 2012-14 2012 34% Reduction in Cases 2013 WPV Cases (n=38) WPV Cases (n=25) # Infected LGAs = 18 # Infected LGAs = 27 92% Reduction in Cases 2014 Taurani 1 case Gaya 1 case 92% reduction in number of LGAs from 2013 to 2014 and 34% reduction in 2012 to 2013 WPV Cases (n=2) # Infected LGAs = 2 Declining active WPV genetic clusters, Nigeria, 2011 - 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 WPV1 genetic clusters Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 L1 L2 N1 N2 N5 N6 N7 N8 WPV3 genetic clusters Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 F4 F5 F6 F7 There has been a 86% decline in circulating genetic clusters from 2012 to early 2014 and a 50% decline from circulating genetic clusters from 2013 to early 2014 2014 PV1 Serotype Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea WEAF-B1 (circulating clusters).
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Terror Bit by Bit by Aaron Brantly FEATURE ARTICLE 1 Financing Terror Bit by Bit by Aaron Brantly
    OCTOBER 2014 . VOL 7 . ISSUE 10 Contents Financing Terror Bit by Bit By Aaron Brantly FEATURE ARTICLE 1 Financing Terror Bit by Bit By Aaron Brantly REPORTS 5 Boko Haram: Recruitment, Financing, and Arms Trafficking in the Lake Chad Region By Jacob Zenn 10 Boko Haram’s Regional Cross-Border Activities By Scott Menner 15 The Motivations of Syrian Islamist Fighters By Vera Mironova, Loubna Mrie and Sam Whitt 17 Syrian and Iraqi Jihads Prompt Increased Recruitment and Activism in Southeast Asia By James Brandon 20 CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts errorism is highly dependent activities.1 While these tools have on cash flows for the purchase gained in popularity, in recent years of everything from munitions their expansion into various terrorist and supplies to domains and organizations has been slow and Tpamphlets. Traditionally, one of the deliberate and has not matched pace more challenging aspects of organizing with transnational criminal uses of these international terrorist activities is same technologies. rooted in financial transactions. The About the CTC Sentinel transfer of money around the world For the purposes of this article, the term The Combating Terrorism Center is an has, in the last decade, fundamentally “terrorist organization” does not include independent educational and research changed the way terrorist organizations the hacktivist community, which has institution based in the Department of Social raise money to support their activities. already demonstrated widespread Sciences at the United States Military Academy, Digital currencies like e-gold, Bitcoin, utilization of these technologies. Here, West Point. The CTC Sentinel harnesses Peercoin, and Dodgecoin provide the term is limited to “international the Center’s global network of scholars and complex yet efficient mechanisms for terrorism” as outlined in 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH-EAST NIGERIA UPDATE January – June 2019
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION (IOM) NORTH-EAST NIGERIA UPDATE January – June 2019 689,000 individuals 136 sites covered 405,500 individuals 60,000 individuals 150,000 individuals 63,863 individuals assisted by IOM in with camp reached with provided with safe assisted with Shelter/ biometrically northeast Nigeria management Mental Health and drinking water Non-Food Items (NFI) registered support, reaching Psychosocial Support assistance 637,930 individuals (MHPSS) activities Relocation from Teachers Village Camp to Stadium Camp, Maiduguri (©IOM 2019) Since the beginning of 2015, north-east Nigeria has witnessed an increase in violence perpetrated by Non-State Armed Groups (NSAGs), causing a major humanitarian crisis. The intensification of attacks has resulted in prolonged insecurity, exacerbating the plight of vulnerable civilians and triggered waves of forced displacement as well as violation of human rights. The crisis remains one of the most severe in the world with 7.1 million individuals in need of humanitarian assistance. 1.8 million people are internally displaced (Humanitarian Response Plan for Nigeria 2019- 2021). IOM provides lifesaving Shelter, Non-Food Items (NFI), Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM), Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WaSH), Livelihood and Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) assistance to crisis-affected populations in north-east Nigeria. The IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a key tool to the emergency response in producing information on the location and composition of the crisis affected population and is endorsed as the key source of data pertaining to the identification and the tracking of trends and patterns of mobility. IOM is also responsible for management of 9 humanitarian hubs on behalf of partners responding to the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadre Harmonize Result for Identification of Risk Areas and Vulnerable Populations in Fifteen (15) Northern States and the Feder
    Cadre Harmonize Result for Identification of Risk Areas and Vulnerable Populations in Fifteen (15) Northern States and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) of Nigeria Results of the Analysis of Current (October to December, 2020) and Projected Prepared: 05/11/2020 Nigeria (June to August 2021) The main results for zones/LGAs affected by food The Cadre Harmonize (CH) is the framework for the consensual analysis of acute food and and nutrition insecurity in the 15 states of nutrition insecurity in the Sahel and West Africa region. The CH process is coordinated by CILSS Adamawa, Bauchi, Benue, Borno, Gombe, and jointly managed by ECOWAS and UEMOA within the Sahel and West African sub-region. Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Niger, The analysis considered the standard food and nutrition security outcome indicators, namely, food Plateau, Taraba, Sokoto, Yobe and the FCT consumption, livelihood change, nutritional status, and mortality. The impact of several indicated that 146 Zones/LGAs in the fifteen (15) contributing factors such as hazards and vulnerabilities, food availability, food access, food states and the FCT are classified under the utilization including water and stability was assessed on these outcomes variables. The results minimal phase of food and nutrition insecurity in indicate that about 10 million (9.8 %) people of the analysed population require urgent assistance the current period. During the projected period, 58 in the current period (October to December 2020). During the projected period (June to August LGAs in Adamawa, Borno, Yobe, and Sokoto 2021), these figures are expected to increase to 13.8 (12.9%) million people unless resilience States will be either in the crisis or emergency driven interventions and humanitarian assistance in conflict affected LGAs is sustained.
    [Show full text]
  • Borno Code O8 Lga Abadam Code: 01 Name of Registration Area Name of Reg
    INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) STATE BORNO CODE O8 LGA ABADAM CODE: 01 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE S/N CODE (RA) CENTRE (RACC) (RAC) 1 AREGE 01 AREGE PRY SCHOOL AREGE PRY SCHOOL 2 BANOWA 02 BANOWA PRY SCHOOL BANOWA PRY SCHOOL 3 FOFUWA 03 FOFUWA PRY SCHOOL FOFUWA PRY SCHOOL 4 JABBULLAM 04 JAB PRY SCHOOL JAB PRY SCHOOL 5 KUDOKURGU 05 G.S.S MAL FATORI G.S.S MAL FATORI 6 KESSA'A 06 DORO PRY SCHOOL DORO PRY SCHOOL 7 MALLAM KAUNURI 07 AFUNORI PRY SCHOOL AFUNORI PRY SCHOOL 8 YAU 08 YAU PRY SCHOOL YAU PRY SCHOOL 9 YAWA KURA 09 ABADAM PRY SCHOOL ABADAM PRY SCHOOL 10 YITUWA 10 YITUWA PRY SCHOOL YITUWA PRY SCHOOL TOTAL LGA ASKIRA/UBA CODE: 02 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG. AREA COLLATION NAME OF REG. AREA CENTRE S/N CODE (RA) CENTRE (RACC) (RAC) 1 ASKIRA EAST 01 ASKIRA CENTRAL PRY SCH ASKIRA CENTRAL PRY SCH 2 CHUL/RUMIRGO 02 RUMIRGO PRY SCHOOL RUMIRGO PRY SCHOOL 3 DILLE/HUYIM 03 DILLE PRY SCHOOL DILLE PRY SCHOOL 4 HUSARA/TAMPUL 04 HUSARA PRY SCHOOL HUSARA PRY SCHOOL 5 KOPA/MULTHAFU 05 KOPA PRY SCHOOOL KOPA PRY SCHOOOL 6 LASSA 06 U.P.E PRY SCHOOL U.P.E PRY SCHOOL 7 MUSSA 07 MUSSA PRY SCHOOL MUSSA PRY SCHOOL 8 NGOHI 08 NGOHI PRY SCHOOL NGOHI PRY SCHOOL 9 NGULDE 09 NGULDE CENTRAL PRY SCH NGULDE CENTRAL PRY SCH 10 UBA 10 UBA MARGHI PRY SCHOOL UBA MARGHI PRY SCHOOL 11 UDA/UVU 11 UVU PRY SCHOOL UVU PRY SCHOOL 12 WAMDEO/GIWI 12 WALAFA PRY SCHOOL WALAFA PRY SCHOOL 13 ZADAWA/HAUSARI 13 LOW COST PRY SCHOOL LOW COST PRY SCHOOL TOTAL LGA BAMA CODE: 03 NAME OF REGISTRATION AREA NAME OF REG.
    [Show full text]