Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Câmpina Municipality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Câmpina Municipality 1 CÂMPINA CÂMPINA CITY HALL LOCAL AGENDA 21 – Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Câmpina Municipality CÂMPINA 2004 2 MUNICIPALITY UNDP Project ROM 98/012, 0033238 Copyright © 2004 Câmpina City Hall, Romania Str. Marasesti no.18, Campina Tel. 0244/336134 Fax: 0244/371458 E-mail: [email protected] © 2004 National Centre for Sustainable Development 15 Alexandru Philippide St., Sector 2, Bucharest Tel: +4021 201 14 10 Fax: +4021 201 14 02 E-Mail: [email protected] All opinions expressed in this document belong to the authors and do not necessarily represent NCSD views. This document was produced with the financial support of the United Nations Development Programme and Campina Mayoralty. Technical expertise was provided by the National Centre for Sustainable Development – Bucharest, Romania. 3 CÂMPINA Local Steering Committee Gheorghe TUDOR – Mayor of Campina Municipality, President Horia TISEANU – Vice Mayor of Campina Mircea ŞERBAN – Inspector for European Integration Florin DRAGOMIRESCU – Director, Campina Municipal Hospital Nicolae RADU – Lt. Col. – Campina Training Centre for Improvement of Transmissions Liviu ŞOLDAN – General Director - The Public Company for Communal Administration in Campina Nicolae BUCUR – General Executive Director – “Steaua Română” Refinery, Campina Dan-Grigore IONESCU – Director, Agency for Regional Development “3 Sud Muntenia”, Prahova branch Mihai VASILIU – General Director - Central Smelter “Orion” Campina Mihai TUDORACHE – President of “Silva” Tourism Club Florin CONSTANTINESCU – General Director “Floricon Salub Campina” Local Agenda 21 Office, Câmpina: Marian Nistor Anca Grigorescu Consultancy from the National Centre for Sustainable Development – NCSD: Călin Georgescu – Project manager George Romanca – Local coordinator for Arad, Bolintin Vale, Mediaş, Sibiu, Sighişoara, Târgovişte cities Radu Vădineanu – Local coordinator for Câmpina, Piteşti, Fălticeni, Târgu Jiu, Vatra Dornei cities Tania Mihu – Local coordinator for Slatina and Zimnicea cities Dan Apostol – Editorial, cultural, scientific consultant Carmen Năstase – Financial coordinator Bianca Bacinschi – Communication Adrian Voinea – IT Specialist 4 MUNICIPALITY Working Groups: Working Group No. 1 - Economic Development and Investment MARINACHE Mircea – Expert in Regional Development, The Agency for Regional Development “3 Sud Muntenia”, Prahova branch; Coordinator TEODORESCU Luana – Director of Department for Promotion and European Integration, Prahova Chamber of Commerce and Industry PREDA Mihaela – Chief of Control Department, Campina Mayoralty NISTOR Marian – Local officer, LA 21 Campina Working Group No. 2 - Social: ROTARU Emilia – Medical Care Director, Municipal Hospital Campina - Coordinator PREDESCU Florin – Zamolxes Foundation DUMITRU Adina – Head of Social Protection Office MURARIU Ciprian – Mutual Association Amus Lt. Col. RADU Nicolae – Campina Training Centre for Improvement of Transmissions Working Group No. 3 - Environmental protection and territorial planning: STAICU Claudia – coordinator, Campina Mayoralty, Control Department LUNGU Iulian – Administrative Director, “Steaua Romana” Refinery POPOVICI Aura – Head of Department of Environmental Protection, Public Company for Communal Administration IORDACHE Valentin – Foundation for Special Operation at Derricks GRIGORESCU Anca – Local officer, LA 21 Campina Working Group No. 4 - Education, Culture and Sports: CIOBOTARU Ciprian – Coordinator, Campina Mayoralty TUDORACHE Andrei – Professor, General School B.P.Haşdeu BRICIU Petra – Chief Librarian, Municipal Library 5 CÂMPINA CONTENTS Foreword by the United Nations II.2.2. Protection of the Environment and Development Programme Resident Resources......................................................... 35 Representative in Romania.......................7 II.2.3. Economical development and investment.......... 36 II.2.4. Health................................................................. 36 Foreword by the the Mayor of Campina II.2.5. Public Order ....................................................... 36 Municipality .................................................9 II.2.6 Education ............................................................ 37 I. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT II.2.7. Culture ............................................................... 37 STRATEGY................................................11 II.2.8 Sport and Leisure................................................ 38 EVALUATION OF THE SOCIAL AND III. LOCAL ACTION PLAN..................................39 ECONOMIC SYSTEM.......................................11 III.1. GENERAL REMARKS ........................................ 39 I.1. PRESENTATION....................................................11 I.1.1. Historical references............................................11 III.2. GENERAL OBJECTIVES.................................... 39 I.1.2. Geographical Location.........................................11 III.3. MEASURES FOR THE STRENGTHENING I.1.3. Relief ...................................................................12 OF INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY ..................... 39 I.2. NATURAL CAPITAL..............................................12 III.4. FINANCIAL PROJECTION 2001-2006 ............... 41 I.2.1. Quality of the environment...................................12 IV. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND I.3. ANTHROPOGENIC CAPITAL ...............................16 IDENTIFIED PROJECTS ..........................43 I.3.1. The economy Câmpina Municipality....................16 IV.1. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND I.3.2. Economic dynamics in Campina municipality ......20 TERRITORIAL PLANNING .............................. 43 I.3.3. Technical and town infrastructure........................24 IV.2. ECONOMY .......................................................... 44 I.4. SOCIAL CAPITAL..................................................25 IV.3. HEALTH AND SOCIAL PROTECTION .............. 45 I.4.1. Population............................................................25 IV.4. EDUCATION ....................................................... 47 I.4.2. Interethnic relations .............................................25 IV.5. CULTURE............................................................ 49 I.4.3. Health ..................................................................26 I.4.4. Civil society..........................................................27 V. PRIORITY PROJECTS ...................................51 I.4.5. Mass-media .........................................................28 V.1. PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FRAME I.4.6. Public safety ........................................................28 WORK OF THE LA 21 PROCESS FOR I.4.7. Social security......................................................28 THE PERIOD 2004 – 2014............................... 51 I.4.8. Work force in Campina municipality.....................30 V.1.1. Rehabilitation of the Boulevard Culturii Park I.4.9. Education.............................................................30 – landscaping of the area.................................. 51 I.4.10. Culture ...............................................................32 V.1.2. Reintegration in the environment of the old I.4.11. Sports and leisure..............................................34 landfill of Campina Municipality......................... 52 V.1.3. Sorting and treatment of solid waste.................. 53 II. OBJECTIVES...................................................35 V.1.4. Modernisation of the Wastewater Treatment II.1. GENERAL OBJECTIVES .....................................35 Plant.................................................................. 53 II.2. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES ......................................35 V.1.5. Rehabilitation of the drinking water transport and distribution systems .................... 54 II.2.1 Development of basic infrastructure ....................35 6 MUNICIPALITY 7 CÂMPINA Foreword by the United Nations Development Programme Resident Representative in Romania Local Agenda 21 (LA21) was developed and adopted This has been aI unique participatory process, at the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 as stimulating the energy of citizens, businesses, a vehicle for promoting sustainable development. Ten academics, NGOs, and local authorities. They all rose years later, in Johannesburg in 2002, the second to the challenge and their collective efforts have summit promoted LA21 as the principal instrument for produced this document. This report grew out of local use in achieving the well-being of the world’s needs and ideas and is a tribute to their efforts, energy population. Aimed at local administration, LA21 and enthusiasm. Whether by giving information, promotes, through public participation, a delicate offering technical assistance or through their balance between economic growth, social equity, and participation, the whole community has made an environmental protection. enormous contribution to its success. The concept of sustainable development calls for a The result is a coherent strategy with a concrete constant re-evaluation of the relationship between action and implementation plan. Both offer a concrete man and nature, and solidarity between generations, certification that the project can meet the needs of the as the only viable option for long-term development. community and represent an important contribution to sustainable development in Romania. I congratulate and thank all those who have contributed to its The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Recommended publications
  • Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Faculty of Letters and Sciences Department of Philology
    International Language Testing Association Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Faculty of Letters and Sciences Department of Philology Report on ILTA Workshop Promoting European Assessment Standards in Romania Ploiesti, October 18-19, 2013 1. Workshop organization Organized under the auspices of the International Language Testing Association (ILTA), the Workshop entitled Promoting European Assessment Standards in Romania aimed to fill in the gap between intended official policies, actual policies and current practices (policy in use) in the field of foreign languages, by assisting teachers with understanding and applying relevant descriptors from the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in order to enhance the quality of test development and examination procedures. The 3,000 US dollar grant generously awarded by the International Language Testing Association (ILTA) contributed to ensuring the good organization of the two-day workshop for a group of 33 participants coming from 4 different Romanian counties (Prahova, Dambovita, Buzau, Brasov), as well as the travel costs, accommodation, and honorarium of the invited keynote speaker and Workshop leader, dr. Jana Bérešová, Head of the English Language and Literature Department, Trnava University, Slovakia. The Workshop homepage http://iltaworkshopro2013.wordpress.com/ provides information with regard to the Workshop program, facilitators and participants, ILTA Workshop Ro Gmail community, useful resources, follow-up events, and a few photos to remind us of the two wonderful and fruitful days that we spent learning from one another. The language of the Workshop was English, but among the participants there were also a few academics interested in using European descriptors of performance when assessing students’ competences in French, German, and Romanian as a foreign language.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium Regions Programme Booklet a Europe That Matters!
    A EUROPE THAT MATTERS! REPRESENTING LOCAL ACTORS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: PERCEPTIONS OF EU POLICY OBJECTIVES AND REGIONAL INFLUENCE Brendan Bartels, Solène David, Anastasia Donica, Alexis Gourdain, Diego Grippa, Daniele Ietri, Juuso Järviniemi, Théo Prestavoine A EUROPE THAT MATTERS! REPRESENTING LOCAL ACTORS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: PERCEPTIONS OF EU POLICY OBJECTIVES AND REGIONAL INFLUENCE Brendan Bartels, Solène David, Anastasia Donica, Alexis Gourdain, Diego Grippa, Daniele Ietri, Juuso Järviniemi, Théo Prestavoine CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. METHODOLOGY 8 3. ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN TOPICS BY THEME 10 4. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 18 5. CONCLUSION 20 REFERENCES 22 INTERVIEWS 24 ANNEX I 27 ANNEX II 34 NOTES 42 Please cite as: Bartels, B., David, S., Donica, A., Gourdain, A., Grippa, D., Ietri, D., Järvin- iemi, J., Prestavoine, T., A Europe that Matters! Representing Local Actors in the Euro- pean Union: Perceptions of EU Policy Objectives and Regional Influence. 89 Initiative. 1.INTRODUCTION Does the European project struggle to present itself in a mea- ningful way to local communities, especially when they are far from metropolitan areas and centers of decision making? The divide between urban and non-urban areas seems to be signi- ficantly divisive in this respect. While in recent years efforts to reach out to local communities have multiplied and “periphe- ral” or “inner” areas have got more attention, much remains unknown about local communities’ perceptions, understanding and implementation of EU policies at the local level. Additional- ly, it is not clear to what extent local communities far from the main centers of decision making are able to represent themsel- ves and their policy priorities to higher levels of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Ploiești /10 Administration, with EU Funding
    1 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the Table of Contents Executive Directors of the World Bank, the European Union, or the Government of Romania. Executive Summary /1 The TRACE diagnostic is part of work done under the Romania Regional Development Program – a Reimbursable Advisory Background /4 Service activity, undertaken by the World Bank at the request National Legislation Regarding Energy /4 of the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Background Ploiești /10 Administration, with EU funding. The report was written by a team comprised of Manuela Mot, Ranjan Bose, Sebastian Sustainable Ploiești /14 Burduja, and Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu. Cristina Zirimis has Public Transport /14 provided logistical and administrative support throughout the Private Transport /19 process. The team would like to thank the colleagues at the Municipal Buildings /22 Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration Street lighting /23 (particularly Ionuţ Trincă and Bogdan Ţigău), as well as the Power Sector /25 colleagues in the Ploiești City Hall and the Prahova County Water and Waste Water/26 Council, who supported the team throughout. Solid waste /29 District Heating /33 TRACE (Tool for Rapid Assessment of City Energy) was developed by ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Energy Efficiency Recommendations /37 Program), a unit of the World Bank, and is available for Energy Efficiency Strategy and Action Plan /38 download and free use at: http://esmap.org/TRACE District Heating /39 Urban Transport /41 Municipal Buildings /48 Street Lighting/49 Annexes /51 1 Executive Summary performed in the district heating sector, there are still obsolete heating pipes that generate water leaks and heat losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Economy in Prahova County
    SOCIAL ECONOMY IN PRAHOVA COUNTY Cristina TOMESCU* Abstract: This article presents the results of a study conducted in Prahova County on the social economy, focusing on employment of the disfavoured groups such as the Roma, the people near retirement age, the young graduates and the people with disabilities. The programs developed by the local institutions aim to support the inclusion of the unemployed on the labour market through programs run by the employment agency and by providing financial support during the period of unemployment. A viable solution to solve the problems of social integration of the disfavoured groups by work might be the development of social economy forms at the local level, the local organisations playing a key role. Keywords: social economy, disfavoured group, unemployment, social inclusion, European funds. Economic and social profile of the county Characteristics of the entrepreneurial economic sector Prahova County is located in the central part of Romania; it has surface of 4.716 kmp and a population of 872.900 inhabitants and a density of 184, 9 inhabitants/kmp. It contains 100 localities: two towns, 12 cities and 86 communes; the rate of urbanization is 52, 4%. The administrative residence of the county is Ploiesti, with a population of 252.715 inhabitants, on the 9th place in Romania as number of inhabitants. It is located on the South part of the Carpathians; the main resources are: oil, natural gases, coal, salt, calcareous stone, used in industry. * She is researcher at the Institute for Research on Quality of Life, email: crisdobos@ yahoo.com Journal of Community Positive Practices 1-2/2010 62 According to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Prahova, the evolution of the county’s economy is favored by the natural resources-oil and mountain tourism potential.
    [Show full text]
  • 92 Recreational Activities in Romanian Mountain Tourism
    Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport / SCIENCE, MOVEMENT AND HEALTH Vol. XVIII, ISSUE 1, 2018 Romania The journal is indexed in: Ebsco, SPORTDiscus, INDEX COPERNICUS JOURNAL MASTER LIST, DOAJ DIRECTORY OF OPEN ACCES JOURNALS, Caby, Gale Cengage Learning, Cabell’s Directories Science, Movement and Health, Vol. XVIII, ISSUE 1, 2018 January 2018, 18 (1): 92-96 Original article RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN ROMANIAN MOUNTAIN TOURISM YILMAZ Monica Denise1, TEODOR Dragos Florin2 Abstract Aim. Romania is a country with a very varied and diverse tourism potential and a landscape consists of 27.91% mountains of total country area, with altitudes between 600 – 2500 m, an average height of 840 m and 10% of the country’s territory above 1500 m (Cernaianu et al, 2017). In Romania the winter sports tourism are focused on the skiing activity and ski resorts. There are some 27 licensed ski areas in Romania with around 80 authorized ski slopes, and a variety of ski lifts, gondolas, chair lifts, skid lifts and cable cars with a capacity of over 35,000 persons an hour serving these areas (Romania National Tourism Master Plan 2007 – 2026). There is heavy demand at weekends during the winter when snow conditions are favorable. Sport event tourism is a huge and growing global industry with important economic implications for both the sport, the event and the impact of travel and tourism related benefits on host destinations (Candrea et al, 2010). The most popular winter touristic destinations in Romania are: Poiana Brasov, Predeal, Sinaia. Previous quantitative marketing research outlined that 45% of tourists are entirely satisfied with the quality of the accommodation units in Braşov city and 37.9% of tourists feel the same way about Poiana Braşov (Candrea et al, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategia De Dezvoltare Locală a Oraşului Băicoi Județul Prahova În Orizontul Anului - 2027
    STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE LOCALĂ A ORAŞULUI BĂICOI JUDEȚUL PRAHOVA ÎN ORIZONTUL ANULUI - 2027 Strategia de dezvoltare durabilă a oraşului Băicoi, jud. Prahova 1 ROMANIA JUDETUL PRAHOVA ORASUL BĂICOI STR. UNIRII, NR.21 COD : 105200 TEL: 0244.260830/0244.260816 FAX: 0244.260987 WEB: www.primariabaicoi.ro BĂICOI -2027 Model al dezvoltării durabile, Strategia de dezvoltare locală a oraşului Băicoi, jud. Prahova 2020-2027 Strategia de dezvoltare durabilă a oraşului Băicoi, jud. Prahova 2 Cuprins Cadrul conceptual…………………………………………………………….………………....6 Reglementări asupra Strategiei de Dezvoltare Locală…………………………….…………….8 Elaborarea strategiei de dezvoltare locală a oraşului Băicoi……………………………………11 Cadrul strategic ce stă la baza strategiei de dezvoltare locală……………………………….….13 Context global și european privind dezvoltarea durabilă……………………...….…….13 Context național pentru dezvoltare durabilă……………………………………...….….17 Context regional de dezvoltare durabilă…………………………………………..…….26 Context județean de dezvoltare durabilă………………………………….....……….….26 Surse de finanțare disponibile…………...……………………………………………….….…..27 Prezentarea generală a oraşului Băicoi………………………………………………………….33 1. Localizare...……………………………………………………………………………….…..35 2. Resursele naturale…..………………………………………………………………………...37 2.1 Clima………………………………...………………………………………..……..38 2.2 Hidrografia…………...……………………………………………………..……….39 2.3 Aerul…………………………………………………………………………………40 2.4 Apa…………………………………………………………………………………..41 3. Istoria oraşului Băicoi…………………………………………………………………….…..41 4. Populația…………..……………………………………………………..................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Settlements in Prahova County. Gis Analysis of Toponymy
    STUDIA UBB GEOGRAPHIA, LVIII, 2, 2013, pp. 111 ‐ 120 (RECOMMENDED CITATION) SETTLEMENTS IN PRAHOVA COUNTY. GIS ANALYSIS OF TOPONYMY IONUȚ TUDOSE1 ABSTRACT. ‐ Settlements in Prahova County. GIS analysis of Toponymy. This paper proposes a method of using GIS tools in spatial analysis of the oikonyms in Prahova County, in order to identify specific links between names and geographical or historical characteristics of the area. In the present paper two types of analysis were performed. The first one was made on oikonyms sorted by suffixes, yielding results of their frequency in the territory. The second one was made on oikonyms composed with word "Valley", establishing the link between their distribution on one side and the character of the valley for studied settlements, on the other side. The results show that territorial analysis of oikonyms can clarify spatial aspects, needed for the affirmation of national, historical and social identity. Keywords: settlements, Prahova, analysis, GIS, toponymy, oikonyms 1. INTRODUCTION Toponymy (from gr. Τόπος, place + ὄνομα, name) is the science that deals with the research of place names. "Oikonym" is a term proposed by Ion Conea for human settlement name, from the Greek oicos = home + onyma = name (Palamariu, 2002). A GIS is an informational system that allows the capture (the introduction), storage, integration, manipulation, processing and visualization of data that have spatial reference (Imbroane, 2012, p. 33). The link between toponymy, as a science and research object, and GIS, as a tool and research method, is quite fragile in Romanian geography. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify the relationship between space and oikonyms with specific morphological structure using GIS analysis tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Highlights Romania’S Location Advantages
    Romania Economic Highlights Romania’s location advantages Ucraina M o S ia o l r m d e B a s i o str g ita v a n U P r u t Si r e t M u er s lt O D u na r e A r g e s D Ploiesti u na r e Se Marea Neagra r bia Duna re Bulgaria Romania is located in the South East of Central Europe, being crossed by three important pan- European corridors: no.4 (links Europe from West to East), no.9 (from North to South) and no.7 (inland water transportation on the Danube River); Located at the crossroads of three major markets: the European Union, the Community of Independent States and the Middle East. Extensive maritime and river navigation facilities such as: 1/3 of the Danube river length; over 200 km of the Black Sea shore; largest and deepest port at the Black Sea – Constanta Harbor which is Europe's South-Eastern entry port; the only maritime and river port on the Black Sea, excellent interface between Europe and Asia – for international operators. Romania at a glance Population : 19,240,758 inhabitants (estimations June 2017) of which 88.6% of Romanian ethnic origin Density: 84 inhabitants per sq.km (2017 estimates) Administrative division: 41 counties and Bucharest municipality (with a county status), 320 towns, 2.861 communes Capital city: Bucharest (approx. 1,677,985 inhabitants) Ucraina M o S ia o l r m d e B a s i o str g ita v a n U P r u t Si r e t M u er s lt O D u na r e A r g e s D Ploiesti u na r e Se Marea Neagra r bia Duna re Bulgaria Workforce: 4,8 mil.
    [Show full text]
  • Razing of Romania's Past.Pdf
    REPORT Ttf F1 *t 'A. Í M A onp DlNU C GlURESCU THE RAZING OF ROMANIA'S PAST The Razing of Romania's Past was sponsored by the Kress Foundation European Preservation Program of the World Monuments Fund; it was published by USACOMOS. The World Monuments Fund is a U.S. nonprofit organization based in New York City whose purpose is to preserve the cultural heritage of mankind through administration of field restora­ tion programs, technical studies, advocacy and public education worldwide. World Monuments Fund, 174 East 80th Street, New York, N.Y. 10021. (212) 517-9367. The Samuel H. Kress Foundation is a U.S. private foundation based in New York City which concentrates its resources on the support of education and training in art history, advanced training in conservation and historic preservation in Western Europe. The Samuel H. Kress Foundation, 174 East 80th Street, N.Y. 10021. (212) 861-4993. The United States Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (USACOMOS) is one of 60 national committees of ICOMOS forming a worldwide alliance for the study and conservation of historic buildings, districts and sites. It is an international, nongovernmental institution which serves as the focus of international cultural resources ex­ change in the United States. US/ICOMOS, 1600 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20006. (202) 842-1866. The text and materials assembled by Dinu C. Giurescu reflect the views of the author as sup­ ported by his independent research. Book design by DR Pollard and Associates, Inc. Jacket design by John T. Engeman. Printed by J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Assistance in Civil and Industrial Engineering Works
    SURVEY ENGINEERING SERVICES SURVEY ASSISTANCE IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING WORKS INTERNATIONAL PARTNER BÜRO SRL was established on 23 March 2007 and specializes in Geodesy, Surveying Engineering, 3D Laser Scanning, UAV Photogrammetry, GIS and BIM. International Partner Buro SRL is an innovative, serious company, offering a wide range of topographic and geodetic services, encompassing a large and varied market. We are one of the most representative companies of 3D laser scanning and surveying services in Romania. The focus is always on quality, which to us is the sum of many factors such as: Professional training of engineers employed at International Partner Buro SRL through training courses on new technologies, solutions and specialized software appeared on the market, and deployed in our company. Punctuality is what we are when the deadline arrives. Always trying to improve the efficiency of the methods used for works to be executed in a project. This is seen by lower costs for our customers. Accuracy refers to the survey tools that we use in the projects in which we participate, and their keeping in the correct parameters. We always perform regular laboratory checks on the instruments. I participate with employees of the management team at international exhibitions and INTERGEO in order to obtain innovative information that I could apply to projects we have in progress and those we will have in the future. We also have our own methods of research and testing, that have resulted in improved accuracies and lower execution time for different types of work. International Partner Buro SRL is a friendly, customer-oriented company, that adds quality to all the projects in which it is involved.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTON ALIN CV Științific* Ploiești, Jud. Prahova 36 Ani Anton Alin Pl
    Investeşte în oameni ! FONDUL SOCIAL EUROPEAN Programul Operaţional Sectorial Dezvoltarea Resurselor Umane 2007 – 2013 Axa prioritară nr. 1„Educaţia şi formarea profesională în sprijinul creşterii economice şi dezvoltării societăţii bazate pe cunoaştere” Domeniul major de intervenţie 1.5„Programe doctorale şi post-doctorale în sprijinul cercetării” Titlu: „MINERVA – Cooperare pentru cariera de elită în cercetarea doctorală şi post-doctorală” Contract: POSDRU 159/1.5/S/137832 ANTON ALIN CV științific* Ploiești, jud. Prahova 1 36 ani [email protected] 2 Titlu teză doctorat TÂRGŞORUL MEDIEVAL (sec. XIV-XVII) Listă publicații . Paveleţ, Eugen, Anton, Alin, Date privind aşezarea getică de la Bărcăneşti, jud. Prahova, în Mousaios, Buzău, 2010, p.89-122. Andrei Măgureanu, Bogdan Ciupercă, Alin Anton, Consideratins on Târgşoru Vechi fort, Survey in Archaeology, often a neglected science, Giurgiu, 2012, p.165-186 . Andrei Măgureanu, Bogdan Ciupercă, Alin Anton, The presence of Rome in Barbaricum: Archaeological evidence of the Interactions between Romans and „Barbarians” in 3 the Târgşoru Vechi Area, XXII International Limes Congress, Conference Book, Ruse, 2012, p.41 . Bogdan Ciupercă, Alin Anton, Roman Imports in Barbaricum. Sicrita archaeological site – Prahova County, 28th Congress of the Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores. From Broken Pottery To Lost Identity in Roman Times, Conference Book, Catania, 2012, p.57-58 . A. Măgureanu, B. Ciupercă, A. Anton, Medieval Heritage from Tărgșoru Vechi. An archaeological overview of 50 years ao research, Caiete ARA, 2013, IV, p. 91-106. A. Măgureanu, A. Anton, B. Ciupercă, One brick-multiple 1 discussions, Caiete ARA, 2014, V, p. 127-134. Vlad Andrei Lăzărescu, Bogdan Ciupercă, Alin Anton, “The Post-Černjachovian horizon in Wallachia revisited.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Disease Outbreaks in Commercial Broiler Farms in Romania PAFF Committee, 3-4 May 2016 Bruxelles Location of the Outbreaks
    National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority of Romania Information on two Newcastle disease outbreaks in commercial broiler farms in Romania PAFF Committee, 3-4 May 2016 Bruxelles Location of the outbreaks • Location of the two outbreaks: Prahova County • Outbreak in Gornet locality • Date of confirmation: 09.04.2016 • Longitude: 26.080181 • Latitude: 45.110460 •outbreak in Măgurele locality •Date of confirmation: 13.04.2016 • Longitude: 26.066434 • Latitude: 45.108841 Primary outbreak: Gornet locality Outbreak holding: 70000 chickens, aged from 9 to 32 days old. Three shelters, each one with two compartments. The infected compartment was that from the shelter no. 2, compartment A. In the infected compartment were kept 13314 chickens. First signs of disease: on 07.04.2016, until the date of confirmation, 975 chicken died. Suspicion: notified by phone by the County Veterinary Authority (SVFSD), on 8-th of April; restriction on poultry movement established, measures according with the provisions of the Council Directive 92/66/EEC. Confirmation: 12 samples were analyzed at the National Reference Laboratory by RT-PCR and anathomo-pathologically, and reacted positive on 9.04.2016. Immunization, epidemiological investigation primary outbreak: Gornet locality • The farmer has two more other commercial holdings, of the same capacity; one of them, in Magurele, was also infected as a secondary outbreak. • The poultry have been immunized three times: on 07.03.2016, on 17.03.2016, the last one on 03.04.2016 with a live, attenuated vaccine. • Even the farmer declared that the flock was vaccinated, the antibodies tittered in the laboratory on 18 samples were found at a low level.
    [Show full text]