This Mission Report Is a Summary of Findings. Participating Agencies Have All Produced Individual Reports That Contain More Details Than This Consolidated Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Mission Report Is a Summary of Findings. Participating Agencies Have All Produced Individual Reports That Contain More Details Than This Consolidated Report Mission Report Inter-Agency Mission to Zintan Detention Centre – 3 June 2019 Note: This mission report is a summary of findings. Participating agencies have all produced individual reports that contain more details than this consolidated report. 1. Background Based on recent reports from humanitarian partners on the extremely poor living conditions, an ad hoc HCT meeting was convened on 27 May 2019 to specifically discuss the situation in Zintan detention centre. At the meeting, MSF from a recent visit reported on the overcrowded situation in the hangar where male Eritrean nationals are placed with poor ventilation, access to poor water & sanitation facilities and inadequate food. It was reported people that are suffering from TB or other illnesses are relocated to Gharyan detention centre which is close to Zintan detention centre. After a thorough discussion, a number of action points were identified and decided by the HCT, which included the commission to OCHA to urgently organize an inter-agency fact-finding mission to Zintan DC, under the control of MoI/Dep of Illegal Migration- which is located in a bit remote mountainous area 180 km south Tripoli. 2. Mission Objectives To verify and assess the situation first hand in Zintan detention centre and report back to HC/HCT on the findings and recommendations. On the day of visit, UNHCR transferred 96 refugees to the GDF based on standard vulnerability criteria (including nearly all women). 3. Participation Kasper Engborg (OCHA), Matthew Brook (UNHCR), Olfa Bakouch (IOM), Sufyan Al Ashheb (WFP), Mohamed Husayn (UNICEF), Osama Sharif (WHO) and Hassan Rezaei (HRS) 4. Meeting with Zintan DC Management Upon arrival at Zintan DC, the delegation met with Mr. Nasser En-Nakou'a, Head of DCs branches in Daher Al Jabel/Western Mountain Region. The meeting was also attended by a staff colleague from IMC. According to Mr. Nasser En-Nakou'a, the total number of people detained at the facility is currently 750, including 8 children, 57 females and 685 males. The delegation was informed that the hangar is currently holding 432 male Eritreans, including 132 under the age of 18. The rest were held at other three wards, of which one was specifically for TB cases. According to Mr. Nasser En-Nakou'a, the situation deteriorated as the result of September 2018 conflict in Tripoli. This conflict worsened the existing dire conditions and due to insecurity, 118 migrants were forced to be relocated from the centers in Tripoli and Al-Zawia to Zintan DC. The issue of TB was discussed; IMC said they suspected that more than 80% of migrants have TB. The majority of those migrants were before in Bani Waleed, Subrata and Al Kufra. IMC explained that 19 cases have been confirmed. Further tests will be conducted after Eid. According to the statistics of the DC management, there have been 22 cases of death; 18 males 3 females and one 1 child in the DC. Some of them passed away after been transferred to Gharyan Hospital. According to the Physician (IMC) working at the DC and following up the migrant’s health, infectious diseases especially from TB (60 cases died) among certain nationalities caused deaths. IMC very recently refers the patients to NCDC branch at Yefreen hospital, nearby Zintan, for TB diagnosis and collecting the medication for the TB diagnosed cases. Mr. Nasser En-Nakou'a reported on the difficulties in handling the deceased, incl. burial of corpses as Zintan and Yafren hospitals do no longer have the capacity to deal with these. Also, the local community has refused to bury the bodies of non-Muslims in the cemetery of Muslim people. The most prevalent cause of death was TB. Sick migrants are transferred to Gharyan DC where most of them die. Mr. Nasser En-Nakou'a mentioned that food is a concern from the view of the management and requested assistance. IOM and UNHCR clarified that food provision is the responsibility of the DCIM and the Government and that the UN do not have the capacity to feed the migrants/refugees unless there is an emergency situation for few days. UNHCR clarified the process of selection for resettlement, while IOM clarified the process of the VHR and insisted on the voluntary decision of the migrant to return home. UNHCR also took the opportunity of the meeting to brief on the relocation of detainees to GDF on the same day, and on the intention to return after Eid to conduct a more comprehensive screening for eligibility. UNHCR also said that the interventions made do not make the UN responsible for detention, it was stressed that this is a decision of the Government of Libya. As such, the UN resolve the problems that are associated with long-term detention, this is rather the responsibility of the Government of Libya. Humanitarian partners can provide some limited immediate humanitarian assistance, as well as seeking solutions for certain refugees and migrants, but not more than that. 5. Observations and findings General observations Zintan DC consists of four wards of which the hangar accommodating the male Eritreans is situated approximately 1.5 km away from the other three wards, where female detainees, male Somalis and some 20 TB patients are held and separated from each other. With the exception of ward for the TB patients, the delegation was able to visit the other three wards without any problems. Conditions are obviously extremely bad, particularly in the hanger with the 400+ Eritrean males. The other two wards were better off, although still not acceptable. An apparent discrimination is that while the female and male Somali wards allow for detainees to walk out in the open air, this is not the case for the Eritreans held in the hangar, who are confined to the inside at all times. It was reported by the Eritreans that the electricity had been cut now for 16 days, which was later learned from the DC management that this was because of misuse that had enabled individual detainees to communicate with smugglers/traffickers. There are trafficking networks active in the region and they try to get contact with the detainees with promises. While mentioning a specific name of a famous human trafficker in Sabrata, one detainees said that some detainees are also victimized by such networks several times. 2 The delegation was informed of disappearances, and a list of some 23 people allegedly disappeared was given to the delegation by the Eritreans. The specific desperate situation of the Eritreans who have suffered at the hands of smugglers and have shuttled around between Tripoli-based DCs like QBG/Ain Zara, also Sabratha, Gharyan – many now two years in various detention centres. This is considered one reason for the high level of desperation, along with poor conditions, diseases, lack of solutions and not least the traumatization caused by their experiences from attempts to cross the Mediterranean Sea and return to Libya, some of them might even had lost relatives. Food The delegation received conflicting messages on the number of meals provided per day. According to DC management, three meals per day were provided whereas according to the detainees respectively one (Eritreans) and two (Somalis) meals were provided. In the Somali ward, the delegation was able to see the food provided, which consisted of approximately 200-300 gr of macaroni with light tomato sauce. This corresponded to what was told by the Eritreans in the hangar as well. From what was seen, the food clearly lacked the necessary nutritious ingredients. The delegation was further told that MSF provide supplementary food when visiting the DC. When asked into by UNICEF, on the distribution of energy biscuits, which was supposed to be delivered two weeks ago to the DC management from UNICEF, it was reported by the Eritreans that these were not received. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene The general sanitation conditions are very poor. In the hangar, the few pit latrines (with no privacy) were supplemented by buckets in which people had use for same purpose. Garbage was piled up against the wall next to the ‘toilets”. Consequently, the hangar had a persistent smell and flies everywhere. Although the hangar had handwashing facilities, no water came out at the day of visit. The delegation was informed that water is only available for a short time twice a day. Water is supplied by truck, and one entered the compound on the day of visit. In the two other wards that the delegation visited, the conditions were slightly better although still not acceptable. Toilets and handwashing facilities were located outside the dormitories, but in the night (when locked up, which the delegation was told by the detainees happened around 4pm), access to toilets and water was through the use of buckets brought inside. The two wards for the male detainees in the detention centre are contaminated with diseases and germs as a result of using the same room where they sleep as toilets Health When entering the hangar, the delegation noticed overcrowding and a persistent coughing among many of the detainees. Combined with poor hygiene and sanitation, the conditions pose serious health risks. The detainees at large complained about lack of access to medical assistance, both IMC and IOM on the ground reported nearly daily coverage of the detention centre supplemented by MSF recently. During a conversation, detainees reported that they had received no feedback related to 3 22 other detainees (17 Eritrean, 3 Somalis and 2 Gambian) who were sick and transferred to either Gharyan DC or a hospital. They claimed that the doctors are not providing them with information. Therefore, they do not want to ask for any kind of health care assistance, added to the perception that from Gharyan, nobody returns to Zintan DC.
Recommended publications
  • Libyan Municipal Council Research 1
    Libyan Municipal Council Research 1. Detailed Methodology 2. Participation 3. Awareness 4. Knowledge 5. Communication 6. Service Delivery 7. Legitimacy 8. Drivers of Legitimacy 9. Focus Group Recommendations 10. Demographics Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research by Altai Consulting. This research is intended to support the development and evaluation of IRI and USAID/OTI Libya Transition Initiative programming with municipal councils. The research consisted of quantitative and qualitative components, conducted by IRI and USAID/OTI Libya Transition Initiative respectively. • Data was collected April 14 to May 24, 2016, and was conducted over the phone from Altai’s call center using computer-assisted telephone technology. • The sample was 2,671 Libyans aged 18 and over. • Quantitative: Libyans from the 22 administrative districts were interviewed on a 45-question questionnaire on municipal councils. In addition, 13 municipalities were oversampled to provide a more focused analysis on municipalities targeted by programming. Oversampled municipalities include: Tripoli Center (224), Souq al Jumaa (229), Tajoura (232), Abu Salim (232), Misrata (157), Sabratha (153), Benghazi (150), Bayda (101), Sabha (152), Ubari (102), Weddan (101), Gharyan (100) and Shahat (103). • The sample was post-weighted in order to ensure that each district corresponds to the latest population pyramid available on Libya (US Census Bureau Data, updated 2016) in order for the sample to be nationally representative. • Qualitative: 18 focus groups were conducted with 5-10 people of mixed employment status and level of education in Tripoli Center (men and women), Souq al Jumaa (men and women), Tajoura (men), Abu Salim (men), Misrata (men and women), Sabratha (men and women), Benghazi (men and women), Bayda (men), Sabha (men and women), Ubari (men), and Shahat (men).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosof Ibderi Was Mayor of Gharyan in Northwest Libya Until Militias Led by Khalifa Haftar Attacked and Seized the City Last Month
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 05/13/2019 8:03:17 PM "DISSEMINATED BY MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC, A REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT, ON BEHALF OF LIBYA'S GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL ACCORD. MORE INFORMATION IS ON FILE WITH THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON, DC". From: Adam Smith Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:50 PM Cc: Adam Smith <[email protected]> Subject: Eyewitness to the crisis in Libya Yosof Ibderi was mayor of Gharyan in northwest Libya until militias led by Khalifa Haftar attacked and seized the city last month. Mayor Gharyan, who was displaced to Tripoli, today released the following statement regarding the humanitarian crisis in the city of 200,000 under control of Haftar: “The humanitarian situation is dire. Most of the residents are trapped in Gharyan and have no place to go. There are no ways of bringing food items, cooking gas, or basic necessities into the town. Haftar’s militia’s created check points and instituted extreme security measures, including confiscating and searching phones, enacting strict curfews.There is no freedom of expression, assembly or movement. Even during the times of Qaddafi it wasn't this bad. Residents live in constant fear, and at some have been killed or are missing. The occupiers are thugs, militias with very disturbing tribal vigilante inclinations. The few residents of Gharyan who were initially supportive of Haftar are now 180 degrees against him after they saw the type of brutality his forces unleashed." For background, Haftar is the militia leader President Trump several weeks phoned to the surprise of much of the international community and apparently the State Department.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Conveyor Belt : Trends in Human Trafficking and Smuggling in Post-Revolution Libya
    The Human Conveyor Belt : trends in human trafficking and smuggling in post-revolution Libya March 2017 A NETWORK TO COUNTER NETWORKS The Human Conveyor Belt : trends in human trafficking and smuggling in post-revolution Libya Mark Micallef March 2017 Cover image: © Robert Young Pelton © 2017 Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Global Initiative. Please direct inquiries to: The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime WMO Building, 2nd Floor 7bis, Avenue de la Paix CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland www.GlobalInitiative.net Acknowledgments This report was authored by Mark Micallef for the Global Initiative, edited by Tuesday Reitano and Laura Adal. Graphics and layout were prepared by Sharon Wilson at Emerge Creative. Editorial support was provided by Iris Oustinoff. Both the monitoring and the fieldwork supporting this document would not have been possible without a group of Libyan collaborators who we cannot name for their security, but to whom we would like to offer the most profound thanks. The author is also thankful for comments and feedback from MENA researcher Jalal Harchaoui. The research for this report was carried out in collaboration with Migrant Report and made possible with funding provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway, and benefitted from synergies with projects undertaken by the Global Initiative in partnership with the Institute for Security Studies and the Hanns Seidel Foundation, the United Nations University, and the UK Department for International Development. About the Author Mark Micallef is an investigative journalist and researcher specialised on human smuggling and trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings Doha Center - Stanford University Project on Arab Transitions
    CENTER ON DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT & THE RULE OF LAW STANFORD UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER - STANFORD UNIVERSITY PROJECT ON ARAB TRANSITIONS PAPER SERIES Number 4, March 2014 PERSONNEL CHANGE OR PERSONAL CHANGE? RETHINKING LIBYA’S POLITICAL ISOLATION LAW ROMAN DAVID AND HOUDA MZIOUDET PROGRAM ON ARAB REFORM AND DEMOCRACY, CDDRL B ROOKINGS The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high- quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s) and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its scholars. Copyright © 2014 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha T A B LE OF C ON T EN T S I. Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 III. The Political Isolation Law and its Alternatives ...............................................................4 IV. Assessing the PIL and its Reconciliatory Alternatives ....................................................7 Establishment of a Trustworthy Government ..........................................................,..7
    [Show full text]
  • Fragile Stability and Future Opportunities in Libya's Sirte
    Issue 2019/21 December 2019 The City in the Middle: Fragile Stability and Future Opportunities in Libya’s Sirte Omar Al-Hawari1 Since 4 April, Libya has been witnessing its third civil conflict in eight years. The conflict was sparked when the General Command of the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF),2 a diverse coalition headquartered in eastern Libya, launched a military operation to wrest control of the capital from actors loosely affiliated to the internationally- recognised Government of National Accord (GNA).3 While fighting has continued in and around Tripoli, with neither side able to gain a decisive victory, there have been concerns that the conflict over the capital could precipitate violence in other areas across the country. The coastal city of Sirte4 appeared particularly exposed, with its proximity to forces allied to the two main warring camps indicating it could become a new frontline. In addition to its strategic location in the centre of Libya’s northern coast, Sirte has a particular symbolism in Libya’s recent history. Having been the stronghold of the Qadhadhfa tribe and of the Jamahiriyya regime between 1969 and 2011, it then 1. Omar Al-Hawari is a communications engineer and researcher from the Sirte region. He has been cooperating with the Middle East Directions Programme since 2018. This paper was written as part of Middle East Directions’ Libya Initiative, which includes a project mentoring junior Libyan analysts. This paper was origi- nally written in Arabic. BRIEF 2. The LAAF is an alliance of armed military and civilian groups led by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBYA: Libya Administrative Map
    LIBYA: Libya Administrative Map AL JIFARAH TRIPOLI AL JABAL AN NUQAT Az Zawiyah AL MARJ AL AKHDAR Abu Kammash AL KHAMS Ra's Ajdir !( !( !( AL MARQAB ⛡ Al Baydah Zaltan Mediterranean Sea !( Zuwarah Tripoli Ra's al Hamamah !( Tripoli !( !(!( !( ⛡ !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( Al Bayda !( Al Athrun Riqdalin !( !( ⛡!(!( !( ⛜!( !(!( Azzawiya \ Susah !( Al Assah!( !( Janzur !( !( !( !( !( Mansur!(ah!( !( !( !( ⛡ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Darnah Al Jumayl !( !( Zawiyat al `Urqub !( !( Suq ad Dawawidah !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( ⛡!( !( Al Fatih !( !( A⛜l Abraq !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ⛡Derna !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( Qasr Khiyar !(!(!( Al Khums !(!( QabilatS alimah !( Qaryat Sidi Shahir ad Din !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Ahqaf a!(l Jabhiya!(h ⛜ !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( Suq al Khamis !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( Martubah!( Suq as Sab!( t !(!(!( !( !( Al Uwayliyah ash Sha!( rqiyah!( Qasr Libiya !(Zawiyat Umm Hufayn !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Al Aquriyah Khadra' !( !( !( Umm ar Rizam Al Watyah!( !( !( !( !( Al Bumbah North Air Base TUNISIA !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( Okba Ibn Nafa Air Base !( !( Ki`am !(!( ⛜ Asbi`ah !( !(!( !( !( !( !( Misratah Al!( Mabni Qabilat al Kawarighiliyah !( !( ⛜ !( !( !( Marawah !( !( AlH uwayjat !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( Tansulukh!( !( !( ⛡!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(M!(!( isurata !( !( QaryatB uR uwayyah !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( At Tamimi!( !( Mintaqat ad Daghdughi !( Bamba Bi'r al Ghanam Bu Ghaylan !(!( !( Qaryat ar Rus !( Al M!( arj !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( Zawiyat al `Izziyat!(
    [Show full text]
  • Report Libya: Security Situation
    Report Libya: Security Situation 19 December 2014 DISCLAIMER This report is written by country analysts from Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. It covers topics that are relevant for status determination of Libyan and non- Libyan citizens whose asylum claims are based on the situation in Libya. The target audience is case workers/officers within the decision-making authorities handling asylum claims as well as policy makers in the four countries. The report is based on carefully selected and referenced sources of information. To the extent possible and unless otherwise stated, all information presented, except for undisputed or obvious facts, has been cross-checked. While the information contained in this report has been researched, evaluated and analysed with utmost care, this document does not claim to be exhaustive, neither is it conclusive as to the determination or merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The research for this report was finalised in November 2014 and any event or development that has taken place after this date is not included in the report. Report Libya: Security Situation 19 December 2014 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. Political Context ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Politics by Other Means: Conflicting Interests in Libya's Security Sector
    20 Politics by Other Means Conflicting Interests in Libya’s Security Sector by Wolfram Lacher and Peter Cole A Working Paper of the Small Arms Survey/Security Assessment in North Africa project, with support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2014 Published in October 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Matthew Johnson Copy-edited by Tania Inowlocki Proofread by Stephanie Huitson Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Frank Benno Junghanns Printed in France by GPS ISBN 978-2-940548-07-1 2 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 20 Lacher and Cole Politics by Other Means 3 The Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and current contributions from the Govern- ments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Uprising and Post-Qadhafi Tribal Clashes, Displacement in a Fragmenting Libya
    30 March 2015 LIBYA Uprising and post-Qadhafi tribal clashes, displacement in a fragmenting Libya The political instability and crimes against humanity that accompanied and followed the uprising which overthrew President Muammar Qadhafi in October 2011 drove tens of thou- sands into displacement. Those perceived to have supported Qadhafi or to have benefited from privileges he dispensed through tribal patronage networks were attacked in retalia- tion. They were often driven out of their cities, unable to return. Some 60,000 IDPs who had fled during the uprising were still living in pro- tracted displacement by February 2015. Civilians walk along Tripoli Street in Misrata. Photo: UNHCR/ H. Caux / June 2011 Following the failure of political processes, Libya’s situation became increasingly anarchic, culminating in the collapse of a fragile central authority and the emergence of two rival centres of power in mid-2014. Against this backdrop, and ensuing infight- ing among myriads of militias, violence increased. There was more than a six-fold rise in the number of IDPs, reaching at least 400,000 by December 2014, some eight per cent of the population. Precise figures are not available given lack of access and on-going pervasive chaos. IDPs’ basic needs for shelter, food and medical services remain grossly unmet. Their physical security has been seriously threatened by indiscriminate shelling, attacks on IDP camps and sieges that have pre- vented them from seeking security. The situation of tens of thousands of displaced migrants who remain trapped in Libya and are particularly vulnerable is a cause for serious concern. State collapse and fragmentation of Libya’s essentially tribal society have hampered an effective national response to displacement and coordination of policies to address IDPs’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Migrant Detention in Libya: Understanding the Players and the Business Models Arezo Malakooti DISCLAIMER
    APRIL 2019 The Political Economy of Migrant Detention in Libya: Understanding the players and the business models Arezo Malakooti DISCLAIMER This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared, researched and written by Arezo Malakooti. Fieldwork was conducted by Arezo Malakooti, Naji Abou-Khalil, Jerome Veyret, Chiara Fall and Jessica Gerkin. Support was provided by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime’s local network in Libya. The report also draws on the in-house expertise of Global Initiative Director and Deputy Director, Mark Shaw and Tuesday Reitano, and Senior Fellow Mark Micallef. The report was peer reviewed by experts from the Clingendael Institute: Fransje Molenaar, Floor el Kamouni-Janssen and Mariska van Beijnum. We are also indebted to the various migrants and key informants who graciously shared their stories and experiences with us. The research for this report was supported by funding under the North of Africa window of the EU Emer- gency Trust Fund for Africa. However, the contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Global Initiative and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union (EU). The photograph on the front cover was taken by the author in a migrant ghetto in Agadez, Niger. Please do not hesitate to contact the author: [email protected] ABOUT THE PROJECT ‘Monitoring the Political Economy of Human Smuggling in Libya and the Greater Sahara’ is a project funded under the North Africa window of the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: State Collapse Triggers Mass Displacement
    30 March 2015 LIBYA State collapse triggers mass displacement The political instability and crimes against humanity that accompanied and followed the uprising which overthrew President Muammar Qadhafi in October 2011 drove tens of thou- sands into displacement. Those perceived to have supported Qadhafi or to have benefited from privileges he dispensed through tribal patronage networks were attacked in retalia- tion. They were often driven out of their cities, unable to return. Some 60,000 IDPs who had fled during the uprising were still living in pro- tracted displacement by February 2015. Civilians walk along Tripoli Street in Misrata. Photo: UNHCR/ H. Caux / June 2011 Following the failure of political processes, Libya’s situation became increasingly anarchic, culminating in the collapse of a fragile central authority and the emergence of two rival centres of power in mid-2014. Against this backdrop, and ensuing infight- ing among myriads of militias, violence increased. There was more than a six-fold rise in the number of IDPs, reaching at least 400,000 by December 2014, some eight per cent of the population. Precise figures are not available given lack of access and on-going pervasive chaos. IDPs’ basic needs for shelter, food and medical services remain grossly unmet. Their physical security has been seriously threatened by indiscriminate shelling, attacks on IDP camps and sieges that have pre- vented them from seeking security. The situation of tens of thousands of displaced migrants who remain trapped in Libya and are particularly vulnerable is a cause for serious concern. State collapse and fragmentation of Libya’s essentially tribal society have hampered an effective national response to displacement and coordination of policies to address IDPs’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya Humanitarian Update April
    LIBYA Situation Report Last updated: 29 Apr 2020 Highlights: Civilians continue to bear the brunt of ongoing fighting. Between January and March 2020, at least 64 civilians have been killed and 67 others injured. One year on, Tripoli remains affected by conflict. Around 200,000 people have been displaced since conflict reignited in April 2019. Displacement continues to increase due to insecurity and hinders people's ability to return home - 374,000 remain displaced across Libya. As of 28 April 2020, there are 61 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Libya, including two COVID-related deaths. Explosive ordinance disposal teams working in Tawergha (Rabie Jawashi/3F) KEY FIGURES FUNDING (2020) CONTACTS $114.9M $13M Kasper Engborg 0.9M 0.3M Deputy Head of Office Required Received People in need People targeted [email protected] 11% Jennifer Bose Ratka 374k 654k Public Information Officer Progress People displaced Migrants and [email protected] in Libya refugees in Libya 138k FTS: https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/931/summary People reached Situation update Despite calls for a truce, conflict continues throughout Libya, impacting civilians and civilian infrastructure. Between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2020, the UN Support Mission to Libya (UNSMIL) has documented at least 131 civilian casualties (64 deaths and 67 injuries). This figure represents an overall increase in civilian casualties of 45 per cent compared to the previous three months. Heavy shelling and fighting has caused further displacement, destroyed people’s homes and damaged critical civilian infrastructure. In the last month, this includes new displacements from Abusliem and surrounding areas, as well as from neighbourhoods surrounding Tarhuna.
    [Show full text]