Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 39 Number 2 Spring Article 2 April 2020 A Grotian Moment: Changes in the Legal Theory of Statehood Milena Sterio Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Milena Sterio, A Grotian Moment: Changes in the Legal Theory of Statehood, 39 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 209 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. A GROTIAN MOMENT: CHANGES IN THE LEGAL THEORY OF STATEHOOD MILENA STERIO* I. INTRODUCTION International law has undergone profound changes over the last decades. It has transformed itself from a set of rules governing inter-state relations, where states were the only actors, to a complex web of laws, treaties, regulations, resolutions and codes of conduct that govern a variety of state and non-state actors in their daily interactions.1 Scholars have thus written about globalization and the changes brought about through its potent forces.2 In the process of globalization, states have lost some attributes of sovereignty, and their bundle of sovereign rights has been meshed in with regional and global rules, which often supersede states' decision-making power. For example, states must consult international organizations and authorities before they decide to use force against other states, before they set applicable import and export trade tariffs, and before they determine that a minority group does not deserve any self-determination rights.