LGBTQ Safe Relationships Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LGBTQ Safe Relationships Handbook LGBTQ Safe Relationships Handbook A Resource Guide for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and the people who support them Second Edition - 2008 835 North Street Boulder, CO 80304 24-Hour Crisis and Information Line: 303-444-2424 Outreach Center: 303-449-8623 Tri-City Office: 303-673-9000 www.safehousealliance.org Table of Contents Acknowledgements Chapter Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Defining the Issue 8 This project was funded in part by a grant from The Open Door Fund, serving the LGBT communities of Boulder County. 3. You Have Options 16 SPAN would also like to thank the staff at the Gay Lesbian Bisexual 4. Legal System: Pros and Cons 20 Transgender Resource Center at CU-Boulder, Colorado Anti-Violence Program, MESA, and Boulder Pride for their assistance and review. 5. For Youth 24 We are additionally grateful for the input of many individuals in the community who generously donated their time and expertise to this revision. 6. For Trans Survivors 26 7. Being An Ally 28 8. Information for Service Providers 34 9. SPAN Services 40 10. Resources, Readings and Referrals 44 Many barriers make it diffi cult for LGBTQ survivors of intimate partner violence to !"#$%&'()*%+'$ access help and safety, and to make choices that are best for them. These include: - fear of retribution by the abusive partner - fear of losing community ties Intimate partner violence. Dating abuse. Domestic violence. When someone you - increased isolation love and trust abuses you, you can experience a range of emotions – from anger - feelings of responsibility for, guilt and shame about the violence to hurt, bewilderment to fear. It can begin with heated words, coercion, a push or - lack of familiarity with available resources a slap. Quite often, this behavior escalates and can become a pattern of abusive - fear of being ‘outed’ behaviors. The isolation or shame you may feel, as well as a hostile political climate - lack of civil rights or being in partnerships that are legally toward LGBTQ people, may keep you from realizing that abuse in relationships recognized and protected occurs in every part of our community, to LGBTQ people of every race, ethnicity, class, age, ability or disability, education level, and religion. In addition to these barriers, LGBTQ survivors must also overcome obstacles created by transphobia, homophobia, and heterosexism. Concerns about police While LGBTQ domestic violence is becoming the focus of increasing research response (or lack of response), lack of accessible and affordable housing, social attention, it has thus far not been examined with anything near the thoroughness violence or the threat of violence, restrictive immigration policies, culturally afforded to heterosexual domestic violence. As a result, estimates of the incompetent counseling and support services, and scorn or disapproval from prevalence of LGBTQ domestic violence remain highly speculative and there is a friends or family all make reaching out diffi cult. complete lack of scientifi c research on domestic violence among transgender and intersex individuals. Although research is limited, studies suggest that the incident The common thread is a gender identity and/or sexual orientation considered rate of violence in same-gender and gender-variant relationships is approximately different from the dominant culture in which heterosexual relationships are the same as in heterosexual relationships, affecting about 25-35% of all couples, considered the ‘norm’ (‘heteronormative’). This difference from the norm depending on the defi nition of domestic violence used1. creates the shared experience of homophobic oppression and the consequences of heterosexist privilege. Since relationship violence happens within the context of The purpose of this Handbook is to de-mystify the dynamics of abusive social oppression of members of LGBTQ communities, our work to support and 2 relationships based on gender identity. It is a resource guide for anyone who advocate for safe relationships is both individual and community-based . identifi es as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and/or ‘gender variant,’ as well as for those who support, love and work with members of the LGBTQ Explanation of Terms communities. While not an exhaustive resource, the Handbook offers education about abuse within relationships, and highlights resources for victims, survivors, LGBTQ: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer. At this point in time, abusers, and those wishing to provide the best possible support to LGBTQ people this abbreviation includes many who identify outside of heterosexual impacted by violence. relationships. However, there is no single “LGBTQ Community.” Individuals who identify in this constellation have very unique experiences, and may If you are in an abusive relationship, this Handbook is a resource guide for you. not share other identities, such as race, class, culture, language, spirituality You are not alone, and will hopefully fi nd some concrete resources and support or ethnicity. In fact, most LGBTQ people have multiple identities making within these pages. This Handbook will not try to convince you to stay or leave, or it impossible to isolate the experience simply as “lesbian” or “queer,” for imply that there is a ‘right’ answer. It is simply a source of information about safety, example. education and resources. Heterosexism: an assumption that the only correct or ‘normal’ way to be is If you are an abuser and would like support in changing your abusive behaviors, heterosexual; systemic oppression based on heterosexuality. you have choices. You may fi nd that the information within this Handbook offers you a better understanding of your behaviors, and gives you the freedom to explore Homophobia: overt acts of discrimination and/or violence based on fear, alternatives. You also deserve support, and will fi nd resources in this guide. hatred, or aversion to LGBTQ people, and to people who appear to blur or violate traditional gender roles. If you are a friend or family member, victims who need support are most likely Sexual Orientation: the affectional or loving attraction to another person. to turn to you. You may be a service provider, advocate, peace offi cer, lawyer or It can range from same-sex attraction only at one end of the continuum to therapist who works with an LGBTQ survivor of relationship violence. You are opposite-sex attraction only at the other end. all important people along the journey of safety, and you can play a pivotal role in supporting victims in making decisions that are best for them. Transgender: a gender identity, not a sexual orientation. Transgender (or ! " trans) has become an umbrella term for those who identify with a gender different from the stereotype assigned to the biology they were born with, or in some way transgress the limiting gender boundaries of the majority culture. Trans people may be lesbian, gay, bisexual, heterosexual or other identity. Transphobia: a fear or aversion to transgender people, or those who do not fi t into societal gender norms. Expression of transphobia ranges from personal discomfort, to outright violence, to systematic institutional discrimination against those perceived to violate gender norms. Queer: a word that was once and, in some places continues to be, used as an insult. However, many have reclaimed it and use the term as an umbrella for all lesbian, gay, bi and trans people as well as others who do not identify with LGBT but experience homophobia and related oppressions because of sexual orientation, reproductive anatomy, and/or gender expression. This Handbook attempts to use non-gendered language, such as the singular “they” instead of “s/he.” We will also use “LGBTQ” and “queer” interchangeably, as well as “victim” and “survivor.” Language is an evolving tool. Advocates should take note that terms are changing all the time, and the best way to be certain is to ask the individuals in question how they wish to identify. Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence (SPAN) is a human rights organization committed to ending violence against women, youth and children through support, advocacy, education and community organizing. The First Edition of this Handbook was published in 2002, and through the continued and generous support of the Open Door Fund, we are able to provide this Second Edition with updated and expanded resources. In writing the updates, however, we discovered that new information, stronger community collaborations, and more relevant and community-specifi c resources addressing violence in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender relationships are emerging quickly, so our hope is that all individuals can use this Handbook as a starting place for information, and can contact SPAN or other anti-violence programs for services, resources, additional information, and referrals that best meet your own unique needs. This edition can also be downloaded for free from our website: www. safehousealliance.org. Sources for this Section: 1. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, www.ncavp.org 2. Mary Allen and Ann Turner, Abuse in Later Life in LGBT Communities. # $ Power and Control ,"-.!"$+$/"%0."#11). The Power and Control Wheel highlights a few of the ways in which abuse can occur in a relationship3. While no relationship or person is perfect, and many people may recognize one or two of their own behaviors on this Wheel, what makes it ‘abusive’ is a pattern of behaviors: are these behaviors repetitive? Consistent? If you are experiencing any form of abuse, you are not alone. You can call the Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) FACTS SPAN Crisis and Information Line at 303-444-2424, 24 hours a day, for confi dential support. IPV is as much a problem in same-gender and gender-variant relationships as in heterosexual relationships. Studies indicate that 30% of LGBTQ relationships struggle with intimate partner violence1. ( )"'*%" &' + # $% >%&%"%?%&7@ , The National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP) reported 3,534 cases # $$ " A.&B%&7@)3 + of abuse in gay, lesbian, and bisexual relationships in 2006. Demographically, ! C('"%&7 85B-%2'()*+,-.
Recommended publications
  • View / Open Final Thesis-Schukis H
    AFTERLIVES (Gender)queer Photographic Self-Representation and Reenactment by HYACINTH SCHUKIS A CREATIVE THESIS Presented to the Department of Art and the Robert D. Clark Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Fine Arts June 2020 An Abstract of the Thesis of Hyacinth Schukis (f.k.a. Allison Grace Schukis) for the degree of Bachelor of Fine Arts with a concentration in Photography in the Department of Art to be taken June 2020 Title: Afterlives: (Gender)queer Photographic Self-Representation and Reenactment Approved: Colleen Choquette-Raphael Primary Thesis Advisor This thesis consists of a suite of photographic self-portraits and a critical introduction to the history of queer photographic self-representation through performative reenactment. The critical introduction theorizes that queer self- representation has a vested interest in history and its reenactment, whether as a disguise, or as a tool for political messaging and affirmations of existence. The creative component of the thesis is a series of large-scale color photographic self-portraits which reenact classic images from the history of “Western” art, with a marked interest in Catholic martyrdom and images previously used in queer artwork. As a whole, the photographs function as a series of identity-based historical reenactments, illustrated through performative use of the artist’s body and studio space. The photographs were intended for an exhibition that has been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The thesis documents their current state, and discusses their symbolism and development. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor and mentor Colleen Choquette-Raphael for her generosity throughout my undergraduate education.
    [Show full text]
  • University LGBT Centers and the Professional Roles Attached to Such Spaces Are Roughly
    INTRODUCTION University LGBT Centers and the professional roles attached to such spaces are roughly 45-years old. Cultural and political evolution has been tremendous in that time and yet researchers have yielded a relatively small field of literature focusing on university LGBT centers. As a scholar-activist practitioner struggling daily to engage in a critically conscious life and professional role, I launched an interrogation of the foundational theorizing of university LGBT centers. In this article, I critically examine the discursive framing, theorization, and practice of LGBT campus centers as represented in the only three texts specifically written about center development and practice. These three texts are considered by center directors/coordinators, per my conversations with colleagues and search of the literature, to be the canon in terms of how centers have been conceptualized and implemented. The purpose of this work was three-fold. Through a queer feminist lens focused through interlocking systems of oppression and the use of critical discourse analysis (CDA) 1, I first examined the methodological frameworks through which the canonical literature on centers has been produced. The second purpose was to identify if and/or how identity and multicultural frameworks reaffirmed whiteness as a norm for LGBT center directors. Finally, I critically discussed and raised questions as to how to interrupt and resist heteronormativity and homonormativity in the theoretical framing of center purpose and practice. Hired to develop and direct the University of Washington’s first lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT2) campus center in 2004, I had the rare opportunity to set and implement with the collaboration of queerly minded students, faculty, and staff, a critically theorized and reflexive space.
    [Show full text]
  • Homophobia and Transphobia Illumination Project Curriculum
    Homophobia and Transphobia Illumination Project Curriculum Andrew S. Forshee, Ph.D., Early Education & Family Studies Portland Community College Portland, Oregon INTRODUCTION Homophobia and transphobia are complicated topics that touch on core identity issues. Most people tend to conflate sexual orientation with gender identity, thus confusing two social distinctions. Understanding the differences between these concepts provides an opportunity to build personal knowledge, enhance skills in allyship, and effect positive social change. GROUND RULES (10­15 minutes) Materials: chart paper, markers, tape. Due to the nature of the topic area, it is essential to develop ground rules for each student to follow. Ask students to offer some rules for participation in the post­performance workshop (i.e., what would help them participate to their fullest). Attempt to obtain a group consensus before adopting them as the official “social contract” of the group. Useful guidelines include the following (Bonner Curriculum, 2009; Hardiman, Jackson, & Griffin, 2007): Respect each viewpoint, opinion, and experience. Use “I” statements – avoid speaking in generalities. The conversations in the class are confidential (do not share information outside of class). Set own boundaries for sharing. Share air time. Listen respectfully. No blaming or scapegoating. Focus on own learning. Reference to PCC Student Rights and Responsibilities: http://www.pcc.edu/about/policy/student­rights/student­rights.pdf DEFINING THE CONCEPTS (see Appendix A for specific exercise) An active “toolkit” of terminology helps support the ongoing dialogue, questioning, and understanding about issues of homophobia and transphobia. Clear definitions also provide a context and platform for discussion. Homophobia: a psychological term originally developed by Weinberg (1973) to define an irrational hatred, anxiety, and or fear of homosexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1994 Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men Suzanne B. Goldberg Columbia Law School, [email protected] Bea Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Suzanne B. Goldberg & Bea Hanson, Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men, 28 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 417 (1994). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1104 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men by Suzanne B. Goldberg and Bea Hanson* I. Introduction cies across the country. According to the New York City Police Department Bias Incident Investigations Unit, aggot! Dyke! Pervert! Homo!" Just words? Or more bias-motivated homicides of gay men in New York rhetoric that illuminates and fuels hatred of les­ City have occurred in the last three years than of all other Fbians and gay men? How often are these words groups combined. supplemented by the use of a bat, golf clubs, a hammer, Anyone can be the target of an antigay or antilesbian a knife, a gun? Studies indicate that lesbians and gay men bias attack regardless of sexual orientation. Bias is based experience criminal victimization at rates significantly on the perpetrator's perception that the victim belongs to higher than other individuals and are the most frequent the targeted hate group.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT AMOLA, OLUWAKEMI. the Effects of Internalized Homophobia on HIV Risk Behaviors Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men
    ABSTRACT AMOLA, OLUWAKEMI. The Effects of Internalized Homophobia on HIV Risk Behaviors among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. (Under the direction of Dr. Marc Grimmett). Background: African Americans, compared to other racial groups in the United States, have the highest HIV prevalence, the highest incidence of HIV/AIDS, the highest HIV mortality, and the greatest number of years of potential life lost. Although all segments of Black communities have been significantly impacted by this epidemic, Black men who have sex with men have disproportionately experienced the negative consequences. Internalized homophobia is a contributing factor to HIV infection and transmission in Black men who have sex with men. It is imperative to assess internalized homophobia in Black men who have sex with men in order to analyze the effects of internalized homophobia on HIV risk behaviors in order to adequately inform counseling interventions. Methods: A quantitative approach was utilized to study the effects of internalized homophobia on mental health and HIV risk behaviors in a sample of Black MSM. The variables of interest were explored with a Web-based survey design. A convenience sample of 202 Black men, who reported sex with a male in the prior 12 months, were recruited via the Internet. Participants ranged in age from eighteen to sixty-five. Results: The results revealed a direct relationship between age and religiosity and internalized homophobia and no significant relationship between relationship status and internalized homophobia. Participants who were HIV positive or were unaware of their status scored significantly higher on internalized homophobia than those who were HIV negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemonic Masculinity and Transphobia Marilyn Chung Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2017 Hegemonic Masculinity and Transphobia Marilyn Chung Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Chung, Marilyn, "Hegemonic Masculinity and Transphobia" (2017). Theses. 2089. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2089 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY AND TRANSPHOBIA by Marilyn Chung B.S., University of California, Davis, 2014 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree Department of Psychology in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2017 THESIS APPROVAL HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY & TRANSPHOBIA By MARILYN CHUNG A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the field of Psychology Approved by: Tawanda M. Greer-Medley, PhD, Chair Kathleen Chwalisz Rigney, PhD Kristen M. Barber, PhD Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale 1/17/2017 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MARILYN CHUNG, for the MASTERS OF ARTS degree in PSYCHOLOGY, presented on January 17, 2017 at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY AND TRANSPHOBIA MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Tawanda Greer-Medley Transphobia research has focused on predictors and correlations of prejudice toward transgender people. Consistently, male participants have higher transphobic attitudes compared to female participants in various studies. Further, males are overrepresented in crimes against transgender people.
    [Show full text]
  • And the Celebration of Queer Youth at One US
    “Misfits” and the Celebration of Queer Youth at one U.S. High School: Implications for Students, Educators, and Communities Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nathan N. Taylor, M.A., M.Ed. College of Education and Human Ecology The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Binaya Subedi, Advisor Dr. Cynthia Tyson Dr. Mollie Blackburn ii Copyright by Nathan Neil Taylor 2012 iii Abstract This dissertation produces a reading of one U.S. high school’s approach to create an educational environment for its students that is inclusive and free of domination. This qualitative study, supported by queer theory and intersectionality, explores the pedagogical practices and school policies that the school uses to inform its model of inclusion. The study expands on the projects of queer theory and intersectionality by focusing on homonormativity, an appendage of heteronormativity, and the complication of identity categories and their usefulness in an educational setting. Specifically, I sought to investigate how the school’s model of inclusion promotes an inclusive, safe space for its students. How the school’s strategies of policing, resistance, and queering occur within this model of inclusion. And, how this model of inclusion acquiesce to and contests existing systems of oppression. The research occurred in a small charter school located in an urban, Midwestern city. My research suggests that the high school adopted policies and practices that build on the students’ identities and challenges the normative and material gaze of the larger society.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race the Opportunity Agenda
    Opinion Research & Media Content Analysis Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race The Opportunity Agenda Acknowledgments This research was conducted by Loren Siegel (Executive Summary, What Americans Think about LGBT People, Rights and Issues: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Public Opinion, and Coverage of LGBT Issues in African American Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); Elena Shore, Editor/Latino Media Monitor of New America Media (Coverage of LGBT Issues in Latino Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); and Cheryl Contee, Austen Levihn- Coon, Kelly Rand, Adriana Dakin, and Catherine Saddlemire of Fission Strategy (Online Discourse about LGBT Issues in African American and Latino Communities: An Analysis of Web 2.0 Content). Loren Siegel acted as Editor-at-Large of the report, with assistance from staff of The Opportunity Agenda. Christopher Moore designed the report. The Opportunity Agenda’s research on the intersection of LGBT rights and racial justice is funded by the Arcus Foundation. The statements made and views expressed are those of The Opportunity Agenda. Special thanks to those who contributed to this project, including Sharda Sekaran, Shareeza Bhola, Rashad Robinson, Kenyon Farrow, Juan Battle, Sharon Lettman, Donna Payne, and Urvashi Vaid. About The Opportunity Agenda The Opportunity Agenda was founded in 2004 with the mission of building the national will to expand opportunity in America. Focused on moving hearts, minds, and policy over time, the organization works with social justice groups, leaders, and movements to advance solutions that expand opportunity for everyone. Through active partnerships, The Opportunity Agenda synthesizes and translates research on barriers to opportunity and corresponding solutions; uses communications and media to understand and influence public opinion; and identifies and advocates for policies that improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions to Challenge Heterosexism and Homophobia on Campus
    Actions to Challenge Heterosexism and Homophobia on Campus Educate Yourself Read gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender literature and history Read newspapers or journals that feature LGBT news/issues Go through a whole day imagining yourself to be a LGBT person Attend LGBT films, worships, seminars, cultural events, or hear speakers Attend a meeting of a group such as PFLAG (Parents, Family, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) Listen to and learn from LGBT people Model Non-heterosexist or Non-homophobic Behavior and Attitudes Take pride in your same-sex relationship Use inclusive language like partner or date rather than boyfriend/girlfriend or husband/wife Make friends with and get close to LGBT people Don’t assume that being gay, lesbian, or bisexual, and transgender people don’t have, like, or want children Keep information you have about others’ sexual orientations/identity confidential Use the same standards for same sex affection in public that you use for opposite sex affection Create an Inclusive Culture and a Welcoming Environment Assume that some people in your residence hall, classes, groups, and/or campus community are LGBT Assume that closeted LGBT people in your residence hall, classes, groups, and/or campus community are wondering how safe the environment is for them; provide safety by making it clear you accept and support all people Put up bulletin board displays that include same sex couples or references to LGBT lives and people Post fliers announcing events of interest of LGBT people; remember there is a heterosexual assumption, so actively advertise that LGBT people are welcome (especially at parties and dances) Find out about and share resources and information on gay-affirmative service providers, events, bookstores, bars, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming an Ally
    Michigan Resources: Biphobia, Transphobia Equality Michigan, (313) 537-7000 & Heterosexism 1-866-962-1147, equalitymi.org Becoming Transgender Michigan, (517) 420-1544 • Interacting with a bisexual or transgender www.transgendermichigan.org person and thinking only of their sexuality, rather than seeing them as a whole, complex person. Other Resources: an Ally Parents and Friends of Lesbians & Gays • Changing your seat at a meeting or event because an LBGTIQ person is sitting next to you. (PFLAG), (202) 467-8180, www.pflag.org Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education • Assuming the gender of a person based on A Guide for Service Providers gender stereotypes or the sex they were born. Network (GLSEN), www.glsen.org & Community Members • Assuming that a person is heterosexual. Information provided by the Lesbian, to Help Make Domestic Bisexual, Gay, Transgender, Intersex, Queer, • Not confronting a joke for fear of being identified as an LBGTIQ person. Questioning (LBGTIQ) & Allies Task Force & Sexual Violence Mission & Goals: Services More • Being careful about the kind of clothing you • Enhance and increase access to advocacy and services for LBGTIQ wear or your mannerisms so that you don’t have individuals who are survivors of domestic and sexual violence. Welcoming to Lesbian, a “certain look.” • Help develop more supportive and inclusive working environments for LBGTIQ service providers. Bisexual, Gay, Transgender, • Assuming that if an LBGTIQ person shows • Provide education to member agencies and the public on issues friendliness towards you, she or he is making a related to heterosexism, homophobia, biphobia and transphobia as Intersex, Queer & sexual advance. they relate to the unique dynamics of LBGTIQ domestic and sexual violence.
    [Show full text]
  • RNAO- Respecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    Position Statement: Respecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity The Registered Nurses’ Association of Discrimination Threatens Health Ontario (RNAO) is committed to Through Violence and Social speaking out against discrimination and Exclusion social exclusion based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The health of LGBTTTIQQ people is compromised by direct assaults such as Ontario is home to between 400,000 and hate crimes, physical violence, and 1.25 million people who self-identify as verbal assaults as well as chronic stress lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, caused by stigmatization. transgender, Two-Spirit, intersex, queer, or questioning (LGBTTTIQQ). Making Discrimination Threatens Access to up five to ten per cent of Ontario’s Health Care population, those who are members of sexual or gender minority communities LGBTTTIQQ clients too often routinely experience threats to their experience barriers to inclusive and health and well-being because of their appropriate care because of practices by sexual orientation and/or gender identity. health care institutions and health professionals that are heterosexist and Sexual orientation refers to how we discriminatory. think of ourselves in terms of emotional, romantic, or sexual attraction to people Discrimination Threatens Quality of the same gender (gay, lesbian), the Work Environments other gender (heterosexual), or either gender (bisexual). Gender identity is Practice environments for LGBTTTIQQ one’s internal and psychological sense of nurses and other health-care oneself as female, male, both, or neither. professionals can be difficult due to heterosexism and discrimination from Discrimination against LGBTTTIQQ colleagues and clients. people may take the form of homophobia, biphobia, or transphobia. RNAO recommendations Heterosexism is the assumption that include: everyone is, or should be, heterosexual.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender History / by Susan Stryker
    u.s. $12.95 gay/Lesbian studies Craving a smart and Comprehensive approaCh to transgender history historiCaL and Current topiCs in feminism? SEAL Studies Seal Studies helps you hone your analytical skills, susan stryker get informed, and have fun while you’re at it! transgender history HERE’S WHAT YOU’LL GET: • COVERAGE OF THE TOPIC IN ENGAGING AND AccESSIBLE LANGUAGE • PhOTOS, ILLUSTRATIONS, AND SIDEBARS • READERS’ gUIDES THAT PROMOTE CRITICAL ANALYSIS • EXTENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES TO POINT YOU TO ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Transgender History covers American transgender history from the mid-twentieth century to today. From the transsexual and transvestite communities in the years following World War II to trans radicalism and social change in the ’60s and ’70s to the gender issues witnessed throughout the ’90s and ’00s, this introductory text will give you a foundation for understanding the developments, changes, strides, and setbacks of trans studies and the trans community in the United States. “A lively introduction to transgender history and activism in the U.S. Highly readable and highly recommended.” SUSAN —joanne meyerowitz, professor of history and american studies, yale University, and author of How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality In The United States “A powerful combination of lucid prose and theoretical sophistication . Readers STRYKER who have no or little knowledge of transgender issues will come away with the foundation they need, while those already in the field will find much to think about.” —paisley cUrrah, political
    [Show full text]