Notice Concerning Copyright Restrictions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pioneers of Modern Geography: Translations Pertaining to German Geographers of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Robert C
Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier GreyPlace 1990 Pioneers of Modern Geography: Translations Pertaining to German Geographers of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Robert C. West Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/grey Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Human Geography Commons Recommended Citation West, Robert C. (1990). Pioneers of Modern Geography: Translations Pertaining to German Geographers of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Baton Rouge: Department of Geography & Anthropology, Louisiana State University. Geoscience and Man, Volume 28. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in GreyPlace by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pioneers of Modern Geography Translations Pertaining to German Geographers of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Translated and Edited by Robert C. West GEOSCIENCE AND MAN-VOLUME 28-1990 LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY s 62 P5213 iiiiiiiii 10438105 DATE DUE GEOSCIENCE AND MAN Volume 28 PIONEERS OF MODERN GEOGRAPHY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 https://archive.org/details/pioneersofmodern28west GEOSCIENCE & MAN SYMPOSIA, MONOGRAPHS, AND COLLECTIONS OF PAPERS IN GEOGRAPHY, ANTHROPOLOGY AND GEOLOGY PUBLISHED BY GEOSCIENCE PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ANTHROPOLOGY LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY VOLUME 28 PIONEERS OF MODERN GEOGRAPHY TRANSLATIONS PERTAINING TO GERMAN GEOGRAPHERS OF THE LATE NINETEENTH AND EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURIES Translated and Edited by Robert C. West BATON ROUGE 1990 Property of the LfhraTy Wilfrid Laurier University The Geoscience and Man series is published and distributed by Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography & Anthropology, Louisiana State University. -
Aip Guatemala Enr 5.3-1 19 Aug 16 Aim Guatemala Aip Amdt 5/16
AIP GUATEMALA ENR 5.3-1 19 AUG 16 ENR 5.3 OTRAS ACTIVIDADES DE ÍNDOLE PELIGROSA Límites Medidas Autoridad Límites Observaciones Verticales Aconsejables Aconsejables Laterales Elevación y Número (Advertencia) (Advertencia) 1 2 3 4 5 Al Oeste de Guatemala Estrato volcán compuesto, activo con Altura señales de bordes de caldera anular y VOLCÁN TACANÁ 4,092 metros sobre el nivel pequeños domos encima, con esporádicas 15 07 54N del mar y 2,300 de altura erupciones freáticas y emisión fumarólica Con actividad fumarólica no INSIVUMEH 092 06 30W relativa en 1855, 1878, 1903, 1949, 1950, mayo explosiva. 1986 que dio origen a un pequeño cráter Departamento de San Marcos Número 1401-13 a 3,600 metros en el flanco noreste del volcán. VOLCÁN TAJUMULCO Altura 15 02 33N 4,220 metros sobre el nivel Estrato volcán compuesto, elevado sobre 091 54 14W del mar, con una altura altas mesetas con actividad fumarólica y INSIVUMEH relativa de 1,200 metros. explosiones en 1821 y 1863. Departamento de San Marcos Número 1401-02 Estrato volcán compuesto, se estima que ha tenido actividad durante los últimos Altura 30,000 años, con reposos de cientos de VOLCÁN SANTA MARÍA 3,772 metros sobre el nivel años, la última gran erupción se efectuó 14 45 23N del mar, altura relativa de en 1902, de tipo pliniano, la ceniza 91 33 06W 1,500 metros. transportada al oeste noroeste a una INSIVUMEH altura de 28 kilómetros, extendiéndose Departamento de Quetzaltenango Número 1401-03 1,500 kilómetros llegando a territorio Mexicano hasta la ciudad de Huaxaca. -
Pacific Offshore Record of Plinian Arc Volcanism in Central America: 2
Article Geochemistry 3 Volume 9, Number 2 Geophysics 8 February 2008 Q02S02, doi:10.1029/2007GC001791 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Pacific offshore record of plinian arc volcanism in Central America: 2. Tephra volumes and erupted masses S. Kutterolf SFB574 at Kiel University/IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany ([email protected]) A. Freundt SFB574 at Kiel University/IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany W. Pere´z SFB574 at Kiel University/IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany [1] Sediment gravity cores collected from the Pacific seafloor offshore Central America contain numerous distal ash layers from plinian-type eruptions at the Central American Volcanic Arc dating back to more than 200 ka. In part 1 of this contribution we have correlated many of those ash layers between cores and with 26 tephras on land. The marine ash layers cover areas of up to 106 km2 in the Pacific Ocean and represent a major fraction (60–90%) of the erupted tephra volumes because the Pacific coast lies within a few tens of kilometers downwind from the volcanic arc. Combining our own mapping efforts on land and published mapping results with our marine data yields erupted volumes of all major tephras along the arc that range from 1 to 420 km3. Recalculated to erupted magma mass, the widespread tephras account for 65% of the total magma output at the arc. -
USGS Open-File Report 2009-1133, V. 1.2, Table 3
Table 3. (following pages). Spreadsheet of volcanoes of the world with eruption type assignments for each volcano. [Columns are as follows: A, Catalog of Active Volcanoes of the World (CAVW) volcano identification number; E, volcano name; F, country in which the volcano resides; H, volcano latitude; I, position north or south of the equator (N, north, S, south); K, volcano longitude; L, position east or west of the Greenwich Meridian (E, east, W, west); M, volcano elevation in meters above mean sea level; N, volcano type as defined in the Smithsonian database (Siebert and Simkin, 2002-9); P, eruption type for eruption source parameter assignment, as described in this document. An Excel spreadsheet of this table accompanies this document.] Volcanoes of the World with ESP, v 1.2.xls AE FHIKLMNP 1 NUMBER NAME LOCATION LATITUDE NS LONGITUDE EW ELEV TYPE ERUPTION TYPE 2 0100-01- West Eifel Volc Field Germany 50.17 N 6.85 E 600 Maars S0 3 0100-02- Chaîne des Puys France 45.775 N 2.97 E 1464 Cinder cones M0 4 0100-03- Olot Volc Field Spain 42.17 N 2.53 E 893 Pyroclastic cones M0 5 0100-04- Calatrava Volc Field Spain 38.87 N 4.02 W 1117 Pyroclastic cones M0 6 0101-001 Larderello Italy 43.25 N 10.87 E 500 Explosion craters S0 7 0101-003 Vulsini Italy 42.60 N 11.93 E 800 Caldera S0 8 0101-004 Alban Hills Italy 41.73 N 12.70 E 949 Caldera S0 9 0101-01= Campi Flegrei Italy 40.827 N 14.139 E 458 Caldera S0 10 0101-02= Vesuvius Italy 40.821 N 14.426 E 1281 Somma volcano S2 11 0101-03= Ischia Italy 40.73 N 13.897 E 789 Complex volcano S0 12 0101-041 -
Mapping Environmental Services in Highland Guatemala Public Disclosure Authorized
PES Learning Paper 2007-4 Mapping Environmental Services in Highland Guatemala Public Disclosure Authorized Stefano Pagiola, Wei Zhang, and Ale Colom Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Latin America and Caribbean Sustainable Development Department World Bank Washington DC, USA Abstract This paper uses data from Guatemala to map areas that are important for the provision of indirect ecosystem services—services whose benefits are enjoyed at some distance from the ecosystem that provides them, such as watershed services (enjoyed downstream) or biodiversity conservation (enjoyed globally). These services are usually externalities from the perspective of land users, and so tend to be under-provided. Mapping the areas that supply such services links the supply and demand of ecosystem services in a spatially explicit way, allows the identification and prioritization of areas of conservation interest. Authors Stefano Pagiola is senior environmental economist and Wei Zhang is consultant in the Environment Department, World Bank. Ale Colom is an independent consultant. Keywords Environmental services, mapping, watershed, biodiversity, Guatemala Acknowledgements Work on this paper was financed in part by a grant from the Norwegian Trust Fund for Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development. The opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ own and do not necessarily represent those of the World Bank Group or the Government of Norway. Cover photo Volcán del Fuego, Guatemala (Stefano Pagiola). PES Learning Papers PES Learning Papers draw on the World Bank’s extensive experience in supporting programs of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). They are part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world. -
Volcanism and Geochemistry in Central America: Progress and Problems M
Volcanism and Geochemistry in Central America: Progress and Problems M. J. Carr1, M.D. Feigenson1, L. C. Patino2 and J.A. Walker3 1Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University 2Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University 3Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois University Most Central American volcanoes occur in an impressive volcanic front that trends parallel to the strike of the subducting Cocos Plate. The volcanic front is a chain, made of right-stepping, linear segments, 100 to 300 Km in length. Volcanoes cluster into centers, whose spacing is random but averages about 27 Km. These closely spaced, easily accessible volcanic centers allow mapping of geochemical variations along the volcanic front. Abundant back-arc volcanism in southeast Guatemala and central Honduras allow two cross-arc transects. Several element and isotope ratios (e.g. Ba/La, U/Th, B/La, 10Be/9Be, 87Sr/86Sr) that are thought to signal subducted marine sediments or altered MORB consistently define a chevron pattern along the arc, with its maximum in Nicaragua. Ba/La, a particularly sensitive signal, is 130 at the maximum in Nicaragua but decreases out on the limbs to 40 in Guatemala and 20 in Costa Rica, which is just above the nominal mantle value of 15. This high amplitude regional variation, roughly symmetrical about Nicaragua, contrasts with the near constancy, or small gradient, in several plate tectonic parameters such as convergence rate, age of the subducting Cocos Plate, and thickness and type of subducted sediment. The large geochemical changes over relatively short distances make Central America an important margin for seeking the tectonic causes of geochemical variations; the regional variation has both a high amplitude and structure, including flat areas and gradients. -
G U a T E M A
!( !h!(!(o !h h !!( !(oh !( !( ! ! oo (! ! ! ! ! o ! ! Buenos 90°0'0"W Xculculche Concepción El Súchil Aires ! Concepción ! ! El Torno de San ! San !( la Bola Antonio Chiuchanha ! Estevan ! Cacao ! !( Orange ! Reforma ! h ! Agua Walko ! ! San Santa ! !( Dolores San ! Las Antonio Isabel Blanca ORANGE ! ! Lazaro h Cruces de la Sabana Buenavista ! WALK ! ! !( !( o San !( !( August !Prudencio SAN !( ! !( !h Corozalito PEDRO ! o o San ! San ! !( San Francisco SAN PEDRO Felipe !( Balancan!( Filipe CAYE TABASCO o ! !( Paixban DOS ! CAULKER !( Water Emiliano Zapata LAGo UNAS Canal Bank CAYEo Bank ! ! CHAPEL Dos o Lagunas PHILIP S.W. GOLDSON INTL. PALENQUE !( ! ! BELIZE CITY Salto de Agua o Palenque (!o MUNICIPAL !( (!o!( Tenosique !(o Belize City h !( !( Cocquericot ! ! Gracia de ! BELIZE CITY TENOSIQUE ! Rockville Dios ! Uaxactún ! ! San ! Recreo Yaloch ! Pedro Progreso Paso ! ! ! Caballos Spanish ! .! El Naranjo ! Lookout Teakettle Belmopan ! Piedras Negras Bank Lacandón ! o DANGRIGA !( Stann Creek Town ! Belize Guana La Providencia (!o Church !( Bank MUNDO ! Mexico MAYA INTL. o (! o MANATEE !( LA LIBERTAD o !( SILVER CREEK La Florida BIG o !( ! ! CREEK PLACENCIA Santa El Ceibal Peten ! o Marta Dolores !( ! !( ! Pico Las de Oro ! o Casemero Rosas Las ! La Unión ! !( POPTUN Palma !( ! Margaritas ! !( !( Pueblo Viejo Comitan ! !( Jalacte SAN ANTONIO !(o Chimay ! Caribbean COPALAR ! o La Cumbre PUNTA Ocean !( ! Chinajá Temax GORDA ! ! RUBELSAo NTO Guatemala o Yalpemech La Unión Ulutelac PLAYA ! ! ! ! GRANDE Xuctzul Tuilá San !( Subajasum ! San -
“Los Volcanes En Áreas Protegidas”, Dirigido a Estudiantes Del Instituto Nacional De Educación Básica INEB, De Guazacapán, Santa Rosa
Luis Ernesto Velásquez Contreras Módulo pedagógico “Los Volcanes en Áreas Protegidas”, dirigido a estudiantes del Instituto Nacional de Educación Básica INEB, de Guazacapán, Santa Rosa Asesor: Lic. Guillermo Arnoldo Gaytán Monterroso Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala FACULTAD DE HUMANIDADES DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDAGOGÍA Guatemala, mayo de 2011. Este informe fue presentado por el autor como trabajo de Ejercicio Profesional Supervisado EPS, como requisito previo a optar al grado de Licenciado en Pedagogía y Administración Educativa. Guatemala, mayo 2011 ÍNDICE PÁGINA CONTENIDO Introducción i CAPÍTULO I 1 DIAGNÓSTICO 1 1.1. Datos generales de la institución patrocinante 1 1.1.1. Nombre de la institución 1 1.1.2. Tipo de institución 1 1.1.3. Ubicación geográfica 1 1.1.4. Visión 1 1.1.5. Misión 1 1.1.6. Políticas 1 1.1.7. Objetivos 2 1.1.8. Metas 2 1.1.9. Estructura organizacional 3 1.1.10. Recursos humanos, materiales, financieros 4 1.2. Procedimientos, técnicas utilizados 4 1.3. Lista de carencias 4 1.4. Cuadro de análisis de problema 5 1.5. Datos generales de la institución beneficiada 7 1.5.1. Nombre de la Institución 7 1.5.2. Tipo de Institución 7 1.5.3. Ubicación geográfica 7 1.5.4. Visión 7 1.5.5. Misión 7 1.5.6. Políticas 7 1.5.7. Objetivos 7 1.5.8. Metas 7 1.5.9. Estructura Organizacional 8 1.5.10. Recursos humanos, materiales, financieros 8 1.6. Lista de carencias 8 1.7. Cuadro de análisis de problemas 9 1.8. -
Estimaciones De La Población Total Por Municipio. Período 2008-2020
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA Guatemala: Estimaciones de la Población total por municipio. Período 2008-2020. (al 30 de junio) PERIODO Departamento y Municipio 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 REPUBLICA 13,677,815 14,017,057 14,361,666 14,713,763 15,073,375 15,438,384 15,806,675 16,176,133 16,548,168 16,924,190 17,302,084 17,679,735 18,055,025 Guatemala 2,994,047 3,049,601 3,103,685 3,156,284 3,207,587 3,257,616 3,306,397 3,353,951 3,400,264 3,445,320 3,489,142 3,531,754 3,573,179 Guatemala 980,160 984,655 988,150 990,750 992,541 993,552 993,815 994,078 994,341 994,604 994,867 995,130 995,393 Santa Catarina Pinula 80,781 82,976 85,290 87,589 89,876 92,150 94,410 96,656 98,885 101,096 103,288 105,459 107,610 San José Pinula 63,448 65,531 67,730 69,939 72,161 74,395 76,640 78,896 81,161 83,433 85,712 87,997 90,287 San José del Golfo 5,596 5,656 5,721 5,781 5,837 5,889 5,937 5,981 6,021 6,057 6,090 6,118 6,143 Palencia 55,858 56,922 58,046 59,139 60,202 61,237 62,242 63,218 64,164 65,079 65,963 66,817 67,639 Chinuautla 115,843 118,502 121,306 124,064 126,780 129,454 132,084 134,670 137,210 139,701 142,143 144,535 146,876 San Pedro Ayampuc 62,963 65,279 67,728 70,205 72,713 75,251 77,819 80,416 83,041 85,693 88,371 91,074 93,801 Mixco 462,753 469,224 474,421 479,238 483,705 487,830 491,619 495,079 498,211 501,017 503,504 505,679 507,549 San Pedro Sacatepéquez 38,261 39,136 40,059 40,967 41,860 42,740 43,605 44,455 45,291 46,109 46,912 47,698 48,467 San Juan Sacatepéquez 196,422 202,074 208,035 213,975 219,905 -
Geothermal Development in Central America: Opportunities and Difficulties
Presented at “Short Course on Surface Exploration for Geothermal Resources”, organized by UNU-GTP and LaGeo, in Ahuachapan and Santa Tecla, El Salvador, 17-30 October, 2009. GEOTHERMAL TRAINING PROGRAMME LaGeo S.A. de C.V. GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA: OPPORTUNITIES AND DIFFICULTIES Carlos Pullinger LaGeo S.A. de C.V. 15 Av. Sur, Col. Utila, Santa Tecla, EL SALVADOR [email protected] ABSTRACT Geothermal exploration in Central America began in the 1960’s and electricity generation from this resource, a decade later. Despite a potential capacity of 8 GW available with the present technology and 13 GW using enhanced technology, only a fraction has been developed. Three and a half decades after the initial production began in Ahuachapán, El Salvador; the total installed capacity from geothermal resources in Central America adds up to 530 MW, only about 5% of the total geothermal potential of the region. Clearly, several factors have contributed to the delay in the development of the geothermal resources in the region. Amongst these are political instability, regulatory, institutional, political, economic and financial barriers, which are common problems in the whole region. In order to revert this trend and accelerate the geothermal development in the future, the National Energy Authorities have to take clear actions to promote the development of known high enthalpy resources and invest in basic exploration of low-medium enthalpy resources, in order to fully take advantage of this indigenous source of energy that has several economic, social and environmental advantages over other renewable and non-renewable sources of energy. 1. INTRODUCTION Central America’s location along the tectonically active margin between the Cocos and Caribbean tectonic plates is the main reason for the existence of many high temperature geothermal areas. -
Geothermal Potential of the Cascade and Aleutian Arcs, with Ranking of Individual Volcanic Centers for Their Potential to Host Electricity-Grade Reservoirs
DE-EE0006725 ATLAS Geosciences Inc FY2016, Final Report, Phase I Final Research Performance Report Federal Agency and Organization: DOE EERE – Geothermal Technologies Program Recipient Organization: ATLAS Geosciences Inc DUNS Number: 078451191 Recipient Address: 3372 Skyline View Dr Reno, NV 89509 Award Number: DE-EE0006725 Project Title: Geothermal Potential of the Cascade and Aleutian Arcs, with Ranking of Individual Volcanic Centers for their Potential to Host Electricity-Grade Reservoirs Project Period: 10/1/14 – 10/31/15 Principal Investigator: Lisa Shevenell President [email protected] 775-240-7323 Report Submitted by: Lisa Shevenell Date of Report Submission: October 16, 2015 Reporting Period: September 1, 2014 through October 15, 2015 Report Frequency: Final Report Project Partners: Cumming Geoscience (William Cumming) – cost share partner GEODE (Glenn Melosh) – cost share partner University of Nevada, Reno (Nick Hinz) – cost share partner Western Washington University (Pete Stelling) – cost share partner DOE Project Team: DOE Contracting Officer – Laura Merrick DOE Project Officer – Eric Hass Project Monitor – Laura Garchar Signature_______________________________ Date____10/16/15_______________ *The Prime Recipient certifies that the information provided in this report is accurate and complete as of the date shown. Any errors or omissions discovered/identified at a later date will be duly reported to the funding agency. Page 1 of 152 DE-EE0006725 ATLAS Geosciences Inc FY2016, Final Report, Phase I Geothermal Potential of -
An Evaluation of the Geothermal Potential of the Tecuamburro Volcano Area of Guatemala
LA41906-MS \ OCT 0 9 1990 - - Los Ahmos National Laboratory IS operated by the University of California for the United States Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36 ir- An Evaluation of the Geothermal Potential of the Tecuamburro Volcano Area of Guatemala Los Alamos National Laboratory I Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 I iI DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. This work was supported by the US Agency for International Deueloprnent . An AfJmative ActionlEqual Opportunity Employer This report was.prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any.warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its us,e would not infringe privately owned rights.