This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from the King’S Research Portal At
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Surname Analysis, Distant Reading, and Migrant Experience: The Irish in London, 1801-1820. Crymble, Adam Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 08. Oct. 2021 Surname Analysis, Distant Reading, and Migrant Experience: The Irish in London, 1801-1820. By ADAM CRYMBLE Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Departments of History & Digital Humanities, School of Arts and Humanities. King’s College London, University of London July 2014. Supervisors Professor Ian McBride, Department of History, King’s College London Professor Willard McCarty, Department of Digital Humanities, King’s College London Abstract After English internal migrants, the Irish were the largest group to relocate to London in the early nineteenth century. This thesis explores the experiences of the Irish communities in London at this oft-overlooked point in the Irish diaspora’s past. The work is split into two parts. The first of these parts focuses on understanding who the Irish were and what it meant to be ‘Irish’ in the early nineteenth century. It also explores what cues contemporaries used to identify the Irish in London during these two decades, and how those cues were different from those that can be used by historians. The goal of this first section is to determine the best way for historians to identify Irish individuals in sets of historical records. This would make it possible to do comparative analyses of the Irish and non- Irish in the city. Ultimately this can be achieved through three processes: nominal record linkage (finding archival evidence of an individual’s Irish connection), keyword searching for Irish geographical terms, and a surname analysis. The surname analysis was based upon a study of 278,000 records from the census of 1841, and validated against thousands of records from 1778-1805, to determine the most reliable surnames. This surname analysis resulted in the creation of a tool (Appendix I), which I argue can be used by historians to identify probable Irish individuals when no other evidence is available. This digital humanities tool was then tested through a series of historical case studies to determine its value for historians. The case studies involved an examination of Irish defendants in the Old Bailey Proceedings, which highlights how the local population reacted to the Irish when interpersonal conflicts occurred. The Proceedings contain abridged transcripts of the trials of all 25,000 defendants tried for felonies in London during this period. Using the census analysis, I was able to identify 1,700 ‘probable Irish’ defendants. I then conducted data mining and quantitative analyses that identified differences in the conflict resolution strategies used by the locals when dealing with the Irish and the non-Irish respectively. i The evidence suggests that locals were more suspicious when dealing with the Irish, and quicker to turn to the legal system when things went wrong. However, it would seem that as a group, the Irish gave cause for concern. An Irish underclass was certainly heavily involved in crime; but more importantly, Irish seasonal migration led to a dramatic increase in the city’s Irish population each summer and autumn. Poor planning by government ministers also meant that mass demobilisation of Irish soldiers and sailors after the wars with the French had a similar effect (particularly in 1802), unintentionally swelling the size of the Irish population in the capital. These impermanent migrants failed to adhere to the social expectations the locals had of their neighbours, thus breeding resentment. For Londoners, the transitory nature of these individuals upended traditional conflict resolution strategies. I conclude that surname analysis can provide useful proxy evidence for historians upon which hypotheses can be generated, and theories can be tested. It is best suited to large textual corpora, and should always be supported by close reading, when possible. ii Dedication For Angela. Who dropped everything to move to the other side of the world, just because I asked. And for anyone who has ever been brave enough to find out what it was like to live somewhere else. Acknowledgements It would seem that these dissertations do not write themselves. Neither are they the product of one person alone. I would like to acknowledge some of the people, institutions, and ideas that helped me get through this project and that helped shape it along the way. Firstly, thanks to my family. In particular my wife, who agreed to move across the Atlantic so I could pursue this PhD. I hope she has not regretted it. To my parents who have always been supportive and who were kind enough to read drafts of my chapters and offer comments. To my Oma and my Aunt Rita who helped me pay the bills as an underfunded international student. And to my wife’s family who too have been endlessly supportive. Secondly, to my supervisors, Professor Ian McBride and Professor Willard McCarty at King’s College London. To Professors Andrew Prescott and Arthur Burns for guiding my research through the upgrade process. Also to Professor Tim Hitchcock, who has offered endless advice and encouragement with no expectation of any personal gain. To Susan Gane for her generous advice on soldiers and demobilisation. To the attendees of the Britain in the Long Eighteenth Century and Digital History seminars at the Institute of Historical Research, which have been an invaluable home where I have found many friends, including but not limited to Janice Turner and Louise Falcini. iii Thank you to everyone who invited me to speak at their events, and everyone who consequently provided advice and feedback at those events. Thank you in particular to the team of the Old Bailey Online, to Peter King, Edmund Cannon, and Jeremy Boulton, all of whom shared data and/or pre-publication prints of their work, which have formed the basis of the analysis in some of my chapters. I would also like to thank those organisations that directly funded aspects of my research: King’s College London Continuation Scholarship (2012) Social Media Knowledge Exchange Scholarship (2012) Software Sustainability Institute Fellowship (2012) British Academy / Leverhulme Small Research Grant (2012) The Irish Embassy (2012) Gale Dissertation Research Fellowship in 19-Century Media (2011) Digital Humanities Observatory, Trinity College Dublin (2011) And those who hired me to write prose, write code, or teach students, and thus indirectly funded my work: Institute of Historical Research (2014) Department of History, King’s College London (2011-2014) The Network in Canadian History & Environment (2010-2013) University Affairs Magazine (2010-2013) Department of History, University of Western Ontario (2010-2013) The National Library of Wales (2013) University of Sheffield (2011) Department of Digital Humanities, King’s College London (2011) Thanks to you all. iv Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. i Dedication.......................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables....................................................................................................................................... x List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... xi INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 PART 1: THE NUANCE OF IRISHNESS AND A NEW TOOL FOR HISTORIANS . 21 1. HISTORICAL IRISHNESS ............................................................................................