DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstract Public-Use Internship with Pea Island

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstract Public-Use Internship with Pea Island ABSTRACT PUBLIC-USE INTERNSHIP WITH PEA ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE OUTER BANKS, NORTH CAROLINA By Jennifer Eileen Weiskittle My internship with Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge primarily focused on public-use activities. I presented and developed educational programs, lead tours, staffed special events, provided nature interpretation, and assisted with visitor center operations. In addition to public-use activities, I performed building, public-use area, and hurricane maintenance duties. I also participated in the turtle volunteer program, a black bear population study, and brown pelican banding. This internship has given me the opportunity to contribute to conservation efforts while expanding my interpretation skills and my love for the environment. PUBLIC-USE INTERNSHIP WITH PEA ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE OUTER BANKS, NORTH CAROLINA An Internship Report Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Science Institute of Environmental Sciences By Jennifer Eileen Weiskittle Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2004 Advisor______________________________ Dr. Hays Cummins Reader_______________________________ Dr. Adolph Greenberg Reader_______________________________ Dr. Gene Willeke CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... V LIST OF PLATES ........................................................................................................................ VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................................................................................................VII Chapter I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 II. IMPACT OF THE INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES..................... 2 III. THE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM..................................................... 4 IV. PINWR AND ARNWR..................................................................................................... 5 PINWR History.......................................................................................................... 5 Location ............................................................................................. 5 Establishment..................................................................................... 6 Colonization....................................................................................... 9 ARNWR History...................................................................................................... 11 Location ........................................................................................... 11 Establishment................................................................................... 12 Colonization..................................................................................... 13 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 13 Management Tools................................................................................................... 14 Structure................................................................................................................... 16 V. INTERNSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................... 17 Roles ........................................................................................................................ 17 Primary Role .................................................................................... 17 Secondary Role ................................................................................ 17 Full Time Public Use Duties.................................................................................... 17 Education Programs......................................................................... 17 “Turtle Talk”........................................................................... 18 “Raptor Rapture” .................................................................... 20 “Sound Side Discovery” ......................................................... 21 Public Canoe Trips.................................................................. 23 ii Roving Interpretation....................................................................... 25 Visitor Center................................................................................... 26 Administrative/Office Work ............................................................ 28 New Program Development.................................................... 28 Current Program Redevelopment ........................................... 28 Writing, Research, and Databases .......................................... 29 Native Plant Garden......................................................................... 30 Media Coverage............................................................................... 30 Press Tour ............................................................................... 30 UNC-TV ................................................................................. 31 Intern Training ................................................................................. 31 Special Public Use Events ....................................................................................... 32 Engelhard Seafood Festival ............................................................. 32 North Carolina State Fair................................................................. 32 Wings Over Water ........................................................................... 33 Tidewater Council Camporall.......................................................... 34 Other Festivals ................................................................................. 37 Maintenance Duties ................................................................................................. 37 Buildings.......................................................................................... 37 Public Use Areas.............................................................................. 38 Rainy Days....................................................................................... 39 Hurricane Isabel............................................................................... 39 Biological Duties ..................................................................................................... 41 Sea Turtle Volunteer Program ......................................................... 41 Black Bear Population Study........................................................... 42 Brown Pelican Banding ................................................................... 43 VI. ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................... 45 Structure................................................................................................................... 45 Training.................................................................................................................... 45 Public Use ........................................................................................ 45 Maintenance..................................................................................... 46 iii Biology............................................................................................. 46 Communication........................................................................................................ 46 Between Program Areas .................................................................. 46 Between Supervisors and Interns..................................................... 47 Staff meetings .......................................................................................................... 47 Programming............................................................................................................ 48 Program Times................................................................................. 48 Program Variety............................................................................... 48 Outreach........................................................................................... 49 Evaluations....................................................................................... 49 VII. OVERALL EVALUATION OF INTERNSHIP .......................................................... 50 VIII. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 52 IX. REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 53 X. APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 54 APPENDIX A. ARNWR STAFF SHEET 2003...................................................... 55 APPENDIX B. PINWR PROGRAM SCHEDULE................................................ 56 APPENDIX C. MOSQUITO HAWK PROGRAM................................................. 57 APPENDIX D. WILDIFE OBSERVATION PROGRAM ..................................... 83 APPENDIX E. WINGS OVER WATER PRESS RELEASES .............................. 87 APPENDIX F. WINGS OVER WATER THANK YOU LETTER........................ 93 APPENIDX G. KIOSK PANEL.............................................................................. 94 APPENDIX H. NATIVE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cape Fear Sail & Power Squadron
    Cape Fear Sail & Power Squadron We are America’s Boating Club® NORTH CAROLINA OCEAN INLETS Listed in order of location north to south Oregon Inlet Outer Banks. Northern-most ocean inlet in NC. Located at the north end of New Topsail Inlet Near ICW Mile 270. As of July Hatteras Island. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. 7, ’20, the inlet was routinely passable by medium Federally maintained.* See Corps of Engineers and small vessels at higher states of the tide. survey1 However, buoys were removed in 2017 due to shoaling, so the channel is currently unmarked. See Hatteras Inlet Outer Banks. Located between Corps of Engineers survey Hatteras and Ocracoke Islands. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. Once inside the inlet itself, the Little Topsail Inlet Located ½ N.M. SW of New passage of a lengthy inshore channel is required to Topsail Inlet. Not normally passable and does not access the harbor or navigable portions of Pamlico currently connect to navigable channels inshore. Sound. Rich Inlet Located between Topsail and Figure 8 Ocracoke Inlet Outer Banks. Located at S end Islands near ICW Mile 275. of Ocracoke Is. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. Once inside the inlet itself, the passage of a shifting Mason Inlet Located between Figure 8 Island and inshore channel named Teaches Hole is required to Wrightsville Beach island near ICW Mile 280. access the harbor or navigable portions of Pamlico Dredged in 2019 but not buoyed as of July 31, ’20. Sound. Buoyed & lighted as of June 29, ’19. See Corps of Engineers surveys1 (for the inlet) and (for Masonboro Inlet Located between Wrightsville Teaches Hole).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County 1790-1958
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County, 1790-1958 Section __E___ Page __1 =================================================================================== Introduction “When Nature came to design the topography of eastern North Carolina,” wrote North Carolina historian Charles Christopher Crittenden in 1936, “she almost persuaded herself to create a great maritime center.”1 The interplay between water and land in Currituck is key to understanding the history and evolution of the county. Although one of the oldest in the state of North Carolina, the county has also been one of the most overlooked. Piecing together the history of the county is difficult. Many of the records pertaining to the early history of Currituck have been lost or destroyed. A courthouse fire in 1842, for example, destroyed a substantial body of records, including marriage records. As a consequence, much of the county’s past lives on as oral history; written accounts tend to be either personal reminiscences or a recounting of events that have been passed orally through the different generations of a family. The history of the county remains to be written. A Geographical Overview of the County The most northeasterly of the one hundred North Carolina counties, Currituck is a peninsula: the land is long and narrow, low and even. The county consists of a mainland 1 Charles Christoper Crittenden, The Commerce of North Carolina 1763-1789. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1936, p. 8. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Outer Banks: Land Use, Management, and Meaning in the Creation of an American Place
    ABSTRACT LEE, GABRIEL FRANCIS. Constructing the Outer Banks: Land Use, Management, and Meaning in the Creation of an American Place. (Under the direction of Matthew Morse Booker.) This thesis is an environmental history of the North Carolina Outer Banks that combines cultural history, political economy, and conservation science and policy to explain the entanglement of constructions, uses, and claims over the land that created by the late 20th century a complex, contested, and national place. It is in many ways a synthesis of the multiple disparate stories that have been told about the Outer Banks—narratives of triumph or of decline, vast potential or strict limitations—and how those stories led to certain relationships with the landscape. At the center of this history is a declension narrative that conservation managers developed in the early 20th century. Arguing that the landscape that they saw, one of vast sand-swept and barren stretches of island with occasional forests, had formerly been largely covered in trees, conservationists proposed a large-scale reclamation project to reforest the barrier coast and to establish a regulated and sustainable timber industry. That historical argument aligned with an assumption among scientists that barrier islands were fundamentally stable landscapes, that building dunes along the shore to generate new forests would also prevent beach erosion. When that restoration project, first proposed in 1907, was realized under the New Deal in the 1930s, it was followed by the establishment of the first National Seashore Park at Cape Hatteras in 1953, consisting of the outermost islands in the barrier chain. The idea of stability and dune maintenance continued to frame all landscape management and development policies throughout the first two decades after the Park’s creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare County Survey Charts and Graphs
    Dare County Comprehensive TTTransportationTransportation Plan Survey Results March 2012 Question 1 What is your primary mode of transportation? (Select ononlyly one.) Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Drive yourself in a motor vehicle 84.5% 1662 Ride with others in a private motor vehicle 9.7% 190 Scooter 0.4% 8 Walk 1.8% 36 Bicycle 3.6% 70 Take a cab or taxi service 0.2% 3 Dare County Transportation Service 2.2% 43 Other. (Please specify): 0.2% 4 answered question 1967 skipped question 252525 What is your primary mode of transportation? (Select only one.) Other. (Please specify): 0.2% Dare County Transportation Service 2.2% Take a cab or taxi service 0.2% Bicycle 3.6% Walk 1.8% Scooter 0.4% Ride with others in a private motor… 9.7% Drive yourself in a motor vehicle 84.5% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2 Question 2 How important are the following transportation goals to you? Very Not Response Answer Options Important Rating Average Important Important Count Service to the elderly and 962 776 184 1.60 1922 disabled Alternative public transportation 627 811 449 1.91 1887 services Increased bicycle routes 822 666 403 1.78 1891 Evacuation routes 1095 648 150 1.50 1893 Economic growth 858 758 234 1.66 1850 Community preservation 1094 706 110 1.48 1910 Increased pedestrian routes 901 722 259 1.66 1882 Reduced traffic congestion 1054 690 168 1.54 1912 Reduced travel time 745 731 385 1.81 1861 Maintain ferry service 944 712 239 1.63 1895 answered 1979 question skipped question 131313 How important are the following transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Variability in Dune Field: Pea Island, North Carolina
    COASTAL OBSERVATIONS: Spatial and temporal variability in dune field: Pea Island, North Carolina By Elizabeth J. Sciaudone1, Liliana Velasquez-Montoya1, Elizabeth A. Smyre2, and Margery F. Overton1 1) North Carolina State University Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 [email protected] 2) Dewberry 2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 410, Raleigh, NC 27607 ea Island is an approximately 13-mile stretch of primarily undeveloped barrier Pisland along the North Carolina Outer Banks, extending from Oregon Inlet south to the town of Rodanthe (Figure 1). While named as an “island,” this region now exists as the northern tip of Hatteras Island, with the shoreline adjacent to the inlet stabilized by a terminal groin built in 1989-1991. It is home to the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge, es- tablished in 1938. The Cape Hatteras National Seashore, established in 1953, is co-located within the refuge boundaries on Pea Island and extends further north and south along the Outer Banks. There is limited infrastructure on Pea Island, consisting of a visitor’s center and other facilities associated with the wildlife refuge, as well as the coastal highway NC 12. NC 12 is the only north-south roadway connecting the Outer Banks with mainland North Carolina; it serves as the only terrestrial evacuation route for the 4,300 residents of Hat- teras Island and all visitors to the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and local communities. According to the Outer Banks Visitors Bureau (2016), the Seashore had a total of 2,266,579 visitors during the year 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of NC Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth-Century
    Queen Anne’s Revenge Shipwreck Project RESEARCH REPORT AND BULLETIN SERIES QAR-R-08-01 An Overview of North Carolina Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth Century Vessel Losses at Beaufort Inlet Richard W. Lawrence NC Underwater Archaeology Branch June 2008 Underwater Archaeology Branch Office of State Archaeology Department of Cultural Resources State of North Carolina Introduction In the most elementary terms, the number of shipwrecks in any given body of water or stretch of coastline can be attributed to the interaction of two factors: the frequency of vessel traffic, and the presence of navigational hazards. For example, the same number of ships involved in coastal trade off the North Carolina coast travel past Cape Hatteras, Cape Lookout, and Cape Fear. Due to the environmental conditions discussed below, however, five times as many vessels have been lost at Cape Hatteras and along the northern Outer Banks than in the vicinity of the other two capes. In considering the North Carolina coast, geomorphology, ocean currents, storm patterns, and trade routes all bear discussion as to their influence on shipping and the occurrence of shipwrecks. Geomorphology A 175-mile long chain of barrier islands known as the Outer Banks forms the northern coastline of North Carolina. From the Virginia border, the Outer Banks run in a southeasterly direction until reaching Cape Hatteras, where the shoreline turns to the southwest until reaching Cape Lookout. Figure 1 Map of Coastal North Carolina (Google 2005) QAR-R-08-01 Lawrence 2 The eastward projection of the Outer Banks creates a vast estuary of sounds (Currituck, Albemarle, Roanoke, Croatan, Pamlico, and Core) fed by river systems (Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse) and numerous coastal creeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Carolina University Students Help Analyze Irene's Damage On
    Western Carolina University Students Help Analyze Irene’s Damage on NC Outer Banks Students and faculty from the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines (PSDS) at Western Carolina University got to see firsthand the damage Hurricane Irene left on North Carolina’s Outerbanks the weekend of Aug. 26. The program is a research center on campus that takes a worldwide and scientific view of developed shorelines. To analyze the damage of Hurricane Irene, the PSDS took aerial photographs both before and after the storm. “The comparison of post-storm imagery to pre-storm baseline data allows for quantification of storm-induced changes,” said Andy Coburn, Associate Director of the Study of Developed Shorelines. Because of safety procedures, PSDS visits impacted locations as soon as possible after the storm has departed. “Safety is our primary concern,” Coburn said. Irene had weakened to a tropical storm prior to landfall, and damages were supposed to be petty, yet Coburn was “surprised to see the magnitude and extent of impacts.” Irene flooded and damaged two sections on Highway 21 along the coastline of the Outer Banks and roads were damaged on Pea and Ocracoke Island. There was also significant flooding in the area. PSDS Director Dr. Rob Young flew over the affected areas following the storm and reported the following details on damages: 1) In general the storm did little damage to ocean front property along the northern Outer Banks. Some dune scarping is visible, but storm surge was less than expected. Even so, Hurricane Irene has opened a new inlet just south of the freshwater ponds on Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge on Hatteras Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Study Report
    ALTERNATIVES STUDY REPORT for NC 12 – Pea Island Long-Term Improvements Bonner Bridge Replacement Project Phase IIa Federal‐Aid No. BRNHF‐0012(56) NCDOT Project Definition: 32635 TIP Project No. B‐2500A Dare County, North Carolina Federal Highway Administration North Carolina Department of Transportation February 10, 2017 Table of Contents STUDY PURPOSE AND PROCESS ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Process ........................................................................................................................ 4 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Alternative Development ....................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Conceptual Bridge on New Location Alternative Alignments ............. 6 2.1.2 Bridge on New Location Alternative Alignments Selected for Preliminary Design and Assessment ................................. 10 2.1.3 Bridge within Existing NC 12 Easement Alternative............................ 10 2.1.4 Connectors to Oregon Inlet ...................................................................... 10 2.2 Description of Phase IIa Study Alternatives .................................................... 13 2.2.1 Bridge within Existing NC 12 Alternative .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 1B: Inventory of Habitat Modifications To
    APPENDIX 1B: INVENTORY OF HABITAT MODIFICATIONS TO TIDAL INLETS IN THE COASTAL MIGRATION AND WINTERING RANGE OF THE PIPING PLOVER (Charadrius melodus)1 Tracy Monegan Rice Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. April 2012 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS’s) 5-Year Review for the piping plover (Charadrius melodus) recommends developing a state-by-state atlas for wintering and migration habitat for the overlapping coastal migration and wintering ranges of the federally listed (endangered) Great Lakes, (threatened) Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains piping plover populations (USFWS 2009). The atlas should include data on the abundance, distribution, and condition of currently existing habitat. This assessment addresses this recommendation by providing this data for one habitat type – sandy, tidal inlets within the migration and wintering range of the southeastern continental United States (U.S.). Inlets are a highly valuable habitat for piping plovers and other shorebirds and waterbirds for foraging, loafing, and roosting and have been documented to be preferentially used over other habitat types during the wintering period (Harrington 2008, Lott et al. 2009, Maddock et al. 2009). While some information is available for the number of inlets stabilized with jetties, revetments, and other hard structures, these data have not been combined with other information that is available for navigational dredging, inlet relocations, shoal mining, and artificial opening and closing of inlets. Altogether this information can provide an assessment of the cumulative impacts of habitat modifications at tidal inlets for piping plovers and other shorebirds and waterbirds. This assessment does not, however, include habitat disturbances at tidal inlets such as off-road vehicle (ORV) usage, pet and human disturbance, or disturbance to dunes or vegetation on inlet shoulders.
    [Show full text]
  • Currituck County Survey, 2010
    Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County 1790 - 1958 Meg Malvasi 2010 NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County, 1790-1958 Section __E___ Page 1 ===================================================================== Introduction “When Nature came to design the topography of eastern North Carolina,” wrote North Carolina historian Charles Christopher Crittenden in 1936, “she almost persuaded herself to create a great maritime center.”1 The interplay between water and land in Currituck is key to understanding the history and evolution of the county. Although one of the oldest in the state of North Carolina, the county has also been one of the most overlooked. Piecing together the history of the county is difficult. Many of the records pertaining to the early history of Currituck have been lost or destroyed. A courthouse fire in 1842, for example, destroyed a substantial body of records, including marriage records. As a consequence, much of the county’s past lives on as oral history; written accounts tend to be either personal reminiscences or a recounting of events that have been passed orally through the different generations of a family. The history of the county remains to be written. A Geographical Overview of the County The most northeasterly of the one hundred North Carolina counties, Currituck is a peninsula: the land is long and narrow, low and even. The county consists of a mainland portion and an offshore strand. This survey was confined to the mainland area and the islands in Currituck Sound, sometimes referred to as the Tidewater; the area of the county known as the Outer Banks was surveyed separately in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avon-Buxton Site 1
    The Avon-Buxton site 1 Figure 2-1 is a 1998 aerial photograph of the Avon-Buxton segment of the Outer Banks showing the location of the Sea-View site. Figure 2-2A is a 1992 oblique aerial view and figure 2-2B is a 1999 aerial photograph of the Avon-Buxton site on Hatteras Island. These figures demonstrate how narrow the Avon-to-Buxton coastal segment is. It is a classic overwash barrier island that is basically sediment poor (relatively small quantity of available sand) and has the highest wave energy along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Consequently, the beach tends to be narrow and steep with coarse gravelly sand sediment (see table 2-LQWKHOHVVRQ³0DNLQJ DFURVVLVODQGWRSRJUDSKLFSURILOH´ In addition, the Avon-Buxton area has extremely high ocean shoreline erosion rates that regularly threaten N.C. Highway 12 and other ocean-front properties, including the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse. Beginning in the late 1930s, and particularly since the 1962 coastal storm, reconstruction and maintenance of ever higher and increasing numbers of temporary barrier-dune ridges have been built to protect N.C. Highway 12. This practice has significantly changed the physical processes and responses along this barrier island segment. Figure 2-2. 7KH%X[WRQ,QOHWVLWHLVRQHRIWKHVHULHVRI1&+Z\'27³KRW VSRWV´ZKHUHWKHFRDVWDOKLJKZD\LVLQVHULRXVMHRSDUG\Panel A: A 1992 oblique aerial photograph shows the 1992 location, as well as two former locations of N.C. Hwy. 12 and the double barrier-dune ridges along the ocean beach built to protect the highway. The most seaward ridge has been severely eroded, and the small portion that remains is steeply scarped.
    [Show full text]
  • Pea Island Life Saving Station on the Outer Banks
    Pea Island Life-Saving Station Rodanthe, North Carolina Coast Guard Station #177 Historic Resource Study Cultural Resources Cape Hatteras National Seashore Pea Island Life-Saving Station Rodanthe, North Carolina Coast Guard Station #177 Historic Resource Study 2008 Written By: Douglas Stover Historian National Park Service Cape Hatteras National Seashore Contents Foreword................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter One: Introduction History of Life-Saving Station on the Outer Banks ..................... 1 Chapter Two: History of the Pea Island Life Saving Station on the Outer Banks................... 6 Chapter Three: Rescues, Wrecks and Assist of the Pea Island Life-Saving Stations on the Outer Banks................................................................................................................. 19 Chapter Four: Architectural History of the Pea Island Life-Saving Stations ........................ 38 Appendix: Collection of Letter of Pea Island Life-Saving Station (1880-1911)................... 50 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 83 i ii Foreward I am pleased to make available this history of the Pea Island Life-Saving Station, Rodanthe, North Carolina. The research was undertaken to help Cape Hatteras National Seashore, Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge and the Town of Manteo interpret the histories of Pea Island Life-Saving Station on the Outer Banks of North Carolina. With the help of many sources and research material from the National Archives, Cape Hatteras National Seashore Museum Resource Center, location of the original material of Keeper Richard Etheridge, Pea Island LSS. My thanks to the efforts of Eugene Austin, and Carole Scott-Sciotto of The East Carolina Pathway to Freedom Coalition that made the effort to save the original cookhouse of the Pea Island Life Saving Station and relocated it to the Town of Manteo at Collins Park.
    [Show full text]