Spatial and Temporal Variability in Dune Field: Pea Island, North Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatial and Temporal Variability in Dune Field: Pea Island, North Carolina COASTAL OBSERVATIONS: Spatial and temporal variability in dune field: Pea Island, North Carolina By Elizabeth J. Sciaudone1, Liliana Velasquez-Montoya1, Elizabeth A. Smyre2, and Margery F. Overton1 1) North Carolina State University Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 [email protected] 2) Dewberry 2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 410, Raleigh, NC 27607 ea Island is an approximately 13-mile stretch of primarily undeveloped barrier Pisland along the North Carolina Outer Banks, extending from Oregon Inlet south to the town of Rodanthe (Figure 1). While named as an “island,” this region now exists as the northern tip of Hatteras Island, with the shoreline adjacent to the inlet stabilized by a terminal groin built in 1989-1991. It is home to the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge, es- tablished in 1938. The Cape Hatteras National Seashore, established in 1953, is co-located within the refuge boundaries on Pea Island and extends further north and south along the Outer Banks. There is limited infrastructure on Pea Island, consisting of a visitor’s center and other facilities associated with the wildlife refuge, as well as the coastal highway NC 12. NC 12 is the only north-south roadway connecting the Outer Banks with mainland North Carolina; it serves as the only terrestrial evacuation route for the 4,300 residents of Hat- teras Island and all visitors to the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and local communities. According to the Outer Banks Visitors Bureau (2016), the Seashore had a total of 2,266,579 visitors during the year 2014. As part of the long-range planning to main- tain a transportation corridor connecting the northern Outer Banks (including Nags Head, Kitty Hawk, and Duck) with Hatteras Island (including the communities of Rodanthe, Buxton, and Hatteras Village), the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC- DOT) has been conducting a comprehensive monitoring study of Pea Island since 2011 (e.g. Overton 2015). This study is based on Figure 1. Location map of Pea Island. Reference transects are shown at 1-mile intervals along the coastal monitoring program study area. The intensive data collection and analysis, with location of the NOAA station ORIN7, Oregon Inlet Marina is shown for aerial photography taken six times a year, and reference. The Oregon Inlet waverider buoy is located approximately 10 digital photogrammetry processing to produce miles offshore east of Mile 1. The white line indicates the NC 12 highway digital terrain models four times a year. These location along Pea Island. data are examined to assess the condition of Shore & Beach Vol. 84, No. 2 Spring 2016 Page 49 the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act was passed. This act amended the 1966 act to ensure that the NWRS is managed as a national system of related lands, waters, and interests for the protection and conservation of our nation’s wildlife resources. The 1997 act established a formal process to determine “compatible use” of a wildlife refuge, and whether or not a proposed use would be allowed. Essentially a “wildlife first” policy is maintained with specified pri- Figure 2. Construction of brush fencing., Photo courtesy National Park ority public uses for wildlife-dependent Service, Cape Hatteras National Seashore Collection (with permission). recreation (e.g. observation and pho- tography, environmental education and the barrier island’s dunes, back-barrier 1984; Dolan et al. 1973). Repair of bar- interpretation, etc.; see the Comprehen- channels, shoreline position, and other rier dunes by the National Park Service sive Conservation Plan for the Pea Island morphologic factors affecting the vulner- also occurred after the Ash Wednesday National Wildlife Refuge (U.S. Dept. ability of the coastal highway. storm of 1962, at locations on Bodie, of the Interior 2006)). Any proposed Pea, and Hatteras Islands (USACE 1965). use or activity such as road relocation, This coastal observation was prepared beach nourishment, or dune construction using data from the NCDOT NC 12 During the 1970s there was a shift in must undergo an evaluation known as a Coastal Monitoring Program, and illus- National Park Service policy, detailed in Compatibility Determination, which also trates the spatial and temporal variability Behn and Clark (1976). This coincided requires public notice and comment. Pas- in the dune field along Pea Island over the with the publication of works by Dolan sage of this act required that any NCDOT 2014 study year. (1972) and Dolan et al. (1973) positing activities outside of the existing NC 12 that the dunes created a barrier to sand HISTORICAL CONTEXT easement within the refuge would need transport and island migration and that Before the 1930s, Pea Island was a to obtain a Compatibility Determination the original state of the island did not wide, flat beach regularly overwashed by ensuring that those activities represented support such features. Behn and Clark waves, with inlets opening and closing a compatible use of the wildlife refuge. (1976) describe how, while the National with storms (Birkemeier et al. 1984). That Since passage of the act, all routine Park Service did not make a public an- changed during the early 1930s, when an road maintenance, including minor road nouncement that they were no longer extensive public works project was initi- relocations, have occurred within the maintaining the barrier dunes, this was ated in order to create a continuous line existing 100-ft easement. Major storm in fact the official policy. of vegetated, protective foredunes from repairs have been allowed outside of the the Virginia state line to Ocracoke Inlet as The coastal highway that is now NC easement through Special Use Permits. described in Weatherwax (1937), Dolan 12 along Pea Island was first paved in RECENT CONDITIONS et al. (1972), Birkemeier et al. (1984), the 1950s (FHWA, NCDOT 2010). (2011-2014) and others. This project was backed by Historically, as the NCDOT worked to In general, barrier dunes first con- the federal government through various maintain a transportation corridor along structed in the 1930s and sporadically agencies including the Works Progress Pea Island, when erosion threatened maintained thereafter have been degraded Administration, and by 1937 was under the road, the preferred alternative was over the intervening years by storms and charge of the National Park Service to relocate the road landward, away long-term erosion. In late August 2011, the (Weatherwax 1937). The effort included from the active shoreline. As a part of island was impacted by Hurricane Irene, construction of brush sand fencing and the cleanup of the prior location of the and two breaches formed, one just south planting of vegetation (Figure 2). Mul- road and easement, dune restoration and of Mile 6 and one in northern Rodanthe tiple levels of sand fencing were often planting of vegetation were often done to (approx. Mile 11.5), eliminating the dune placed to increase the dune height. The re-establish the beach-dune system. This field in those locations (Figure 1). constructed dune heights varied from 10 strategy continued through the mid-1990s to 26 feet, and the dune base widths were when road relocation projects allowed The breach near Mile 6 occurred approximately 80-330 feet (Birkemeier et for restoration of dunes along the former where multiple historic inlets known as al. 1984). Once the dunes were built to highway easement. New Inlet have opened and closed (see the desired height and width, the vegeta- Birkemeier et al. 1984; Clinch et al. However, in 1997 regulatory changes tion was planted, primarily beach grasses 2012). This breach existed as a tidal inlet caused a shift in the management strategy and shrubs (Weatherwax 1937). from 2011 until 2013 and was known for the coastal highway. The National as the Pea Island Breach (Velasquez- The initial construction was fortified Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) was Montoya et al. 2015); the opening of by the National Park Service along the created in 1966 with passage of the Na- this ephemeral inlet destroyed part of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore later in tional Wildlife Refuge System Adminis- NC 12 highway, which was closed for a the 1950s using bulldozing, brush sand tration Act. The NWRS includes the Pea month — requiring residents and visitors fencing, and plantings (Birkemeier et al. Island National Wildlife Refuge. In 1997, to access Hatteras Island via ferry — until Page 50 Shore & Beach Vol. 84, No. 2 Spring 2016 Figure 3. Lines show a 0.5-mile running average of maximum elevation at each transect displayed from north to south along the study area for each topographic data set. Elevations at the centerline of NC 12 are plotted in with hollow triangles for comparison. Background colors correspond to the locations described in Table 1. Modified from Overton (2015). Table 1. Alongshore dune characteristics at Pea Island, North Carolina. Average dune Average horizontal crest elevation distance of dune in 2014 crest from edge of Location Local name Description (ft NAVD88) pavement in 2014 (ft) Miles 0-2 Canal Zone NC 12 is immediately adjacent to dunes; 20 194 dune sand is highly mobile via wind and water transport Miles 2-4 Northernmost NC 12 is immediately adjacent to dunes; 14 90 Freshwater overwash observed during Sandy; dunes Pond have minimal vegetation. Miles 4-6 Old NC 12 was relocated landward from 20 236 Sandbag original alignment in this area in 1996; Area some remnant dunes that were constructed at that time still exist. Mile 6 Pea Island Temporary metal bridge in place at breach; 12 322 Breach dunes removed over most of this section, frequent overwash and flow through breach during storms. Mile 7-10 Stable Zone Wider island, NC 12 located at substantial 28 741 distance from active beach; historical constructed dunes still in place over most of the area; dunes highly vegetated.
Recommended publications
  • Advocacy Coalitions, Bonner Bridge, and the Future of Nc 12 on North Carolina’S Outer Banks
    SHIFTING SANDS AND SHIFTING STRATEGIES: ADVOCACY COALITIONS, BONNER BRIDGE, AND THE FUTURE OF NC 12 ON NORTH CAROLINA’S OUTER BANKS by Deanna F. Swain May 2017 Director of Dissertation: Dr. Burrell Montz Major Department: Coastal Resources Management Coastal management decisions are complicated. They involve an array of competing concerns, including environmental, social, economic, recreational, and property interests, and are inherently political. These decisions become even more difficult when interested groups use their political and economic leverage to influence the policy debate. The Bonner Bridge replacement project on North Carolina’s Outer Banks is an example of how this blend of politics, science, and competing interests can result in extraordinary complexity. This research project uses a qualitative case study of the Bonner Bridge replacement to explore how a bridge project became more about priorities and values than science and technical feasibility and how interested parties, acting through informal coalitions, strategically worked to shape the policy debate. In the process, we see how the replacement of a single aging bridge required 25 years of planning, four environmental impact statements, an environmental assessment, federal and state lawsuits, and a negotiated settlement before a single piling was put into place. Drawing on the policy process literature, this project applies aspects of the Advocacy Coalition and Narrative Policy Frameworks to a qualitative content analysis of the bridge project over a 25 year period (1990-2015). The analysis tracks the emergence and evolution of two distinct coalitions and compares their use of general and narrative strategies to influence the bridge debate. The project addresses an under-explored area in the Advocacy Coalition Framework literature by focusing on how coalitions act strategically to exploit an internal shock within the policy subsystem and contributes to the literature by exploring the intersection of the two frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Capt Marty's Outer Banks Fishing Guide
    2008 TIDE CHART & FISHING REGULATIONS OUTEROUTER BANKSBANKS FFISHINGISHING GUIDEGUIDE Presented by your friends: Cover Photo Credit © Jenny Lippincott Regardless of the mood you’re trying to create in your home, you’ll find the perfect colors at Ace. From clean crisp whites to rich robust deep tones, you’re certain to find just the right Colors for Your Life. Colors for Your Life ™ Your Personality.Your Style.Your Color. casual modern timeless STOP IN AND SEE US! Manteo • Elizabeth City • Avon Corolla • Nags Head • Kitty Hawk WELCOME TO OUR SECOND ANNUAL FISHING GUIDE Welcome to the Outer Banks first vacation guide totally devoted to fishing! The idea of this guide has been kicking around in my head for a few years now. Capt. Marty and I have talked about it off and on too and we both saw the need for this type of publication. Our great staff at Max Radio of the Carolinas got busy putting the word out about the possibility of this guide and the response was overwhelming. It seems many others saw the need for such a guide and all agreed that Capt. Marty was the perfect man for the job. This is one guide that is great for both vacationers and locals. So many people come to the Outer Banks to fish. But many others are drawn to fishing after they get here and see how much fun everyone is having. Whether you fish the surf, the sound, from the pier, in-shore, near-shore or off-shore, I hope you find the Capt. Marty’s Fishing guide useful and enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge Refuge Facts ■ Endangered and threatened ■ Established: April 12, 1938. species include loggerhead sea turtles and piping plovers. Both ■ Size: Originally: 5,915 acres species nest on the refuge. (land), 25,700 acres (Proclamation Boundary Waters). Currently: Financial Impacts 4,655 acres. ■ Administered by Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. Pea ■ Administered by Alligator River Island has no assigned staff or National Wildlife Refuge. budget. photo: USFWS photo: ■ Located on the north end of ■ One employee reports for duty Hatteras Island, a coastal barrier to Pea Island National Wildlife island and part of a chain of islands Refuge on a daily basis. known as the Outer Banks. ■ Numerous volunteers devote ■ Approximately 13 miles long (north approximately 25,000 hours each to south) and ranges from a quarter year to Pea Island. mile to one mile wide (from east to west). ■ 2.7 million visitors annually. ■ Location: 10 miles south of Nags ■ Known as a “Birder’s Paradise”; Head, NC on NC Highway 12. birders are among the most photo: USFWS photo: affluent eco-tourists. Other visitors ■ The Comprehensive Conservation include paddlers, fishermen, and Plan for Pea Island National photographers. Wildlife Refuge was completed July 17, 2006. Refuge Goals ■ Protect, maintain, and enhance Natural History healthy and viable populations ■ Area was historically used for of indigenous migratory birds, market waterfowl hunting, hunt wildlife, fish, and plants including clubs, commercial fishing, farming, federal and state threatened and and livestock operations. photo: USFWS photo: endangered species. ■ Refuge is comprised of ocean ■ Restore, maintain, and enhance the beach, dunes, upland, fresh and health and biodiversity of barrier brackish water ponds, salt flats, and island upland and wetland habitats salt marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Years of Sand Bypassed from Oregon Inlet to Pea Island)
    0058423 Impacts of Dredging and Inlet Bypassing on the Inter-tidal Ecology of Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge (12 Years of Sand Bypassed from Oregon Inlet to Pea Island) Dennis Stewart US Fish and Wildlife Service and Robert Dolan University of Virginia 1 0058424 2 0058425 3 0058426 4 0058427 5 0058428 6 0058429 • Cape Hatteras National Seashore • Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge • National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 • Compatibility Determination 7 0058430 Fundamental Questions • Anticipated physical impacts to beach? • What are the ecological implications? • Compatible with mission and purpose? 8 0058431 9 0058432 Table 1. Statistical Summary Location Sand Size S.D. Heavy Minerals Percent Fine Sand (In mm) (Dark Minerals) (‹0.25mm) Pea Island Swash zone 0.57mm 1.3 2.5% 32% Oregon Inlet 0.26mm 2.4 11% 50% Spit Ocean Bar 0.45mm 3.3 6% 33% Oregon Inlet 0.22mm 2.0 10% 60% Channel 10 0058433 11 0058434 Significant Impacts • 1. Burial (>4cm without wave runup) • 2. Finer grains & high % heavy mineral • Degree of impact correlated with: – Frequency – Volume –Placement Trend in mean grain size from 1990-2002, mid swash zone, Pea Island, NC. 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 R = 0.68 2 0.4 R = 0.46 0.3 0.2 Average mean grain size (mm) size meanAverage grain 0.1 0 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Dredge Disposal Data 3 1200000 Hopper Dredge 1000000 Pipeline Dredge 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 Volume of sand deposited y Volume deposited sand of 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 12 0058435 Trend in heavy mineral content of the Mid-Swash Zone 1992-2002 18.00 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 R = 0.81 8.00 R2 = 0.65 6.00 Mineral Abundance (%) 4.00 2.00 0.00 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Dredge Disposal Data ) 3 1200000 Hopper Dredge 1000000 Pipeline Dredge 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Volume of sand deposited (y Trend of decline in Emerita counts taken from 1990-2002 along Pea Island, NC.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Inlet Opened in 1846 As Water Rushed from the Sound to the Ocean
    Oregon Inlet opened in 1846, when a big hurricane along the Outer Banks caused water to rush from the sound to the ocean. Since that time, the inlet has migrated steadily south at a rate of around 100 feet per year. A good measure of the inlet’s journey is the Bodie Island Lighthouse, which once stood at the margin of the inlet but is now 3 miles away. In 1962, the Bonner Bridge replaced the ferry that shuttled people and cars across Oregon Inlet. Construction of the bridge, with its high fixed-span, instantly stopped the long history if inlet migration. But sand continued to pour into the inlet from the north, the driving force behind the inlet’s southerly migration, creating ever-expanding navigation and dredging problems. After 40 years, the Bonner Bridge is rapidly deteriorating and two possible replacement alternatives are being evaluated: A bridge immediately parallel to the current bridge and a 17 mile-long bridge that would extend into Pamlico Sound, run along the backside of Pea Island and connect to Hatters Island at Rodanthe. The initial cost of constructing the Pamlico Sound Bridge is much higher than that of the Parallel Bridge. But the overall long-term costs of a Parallel Bridge greatly exceed those of the Pamlico Sound Bridge. This is because the Parallel Bridge requires the continued protection and maintenance of State Highway 12 on Pea Island. Over time, as the shoreline erodes back in response to a rising sea level, the cost of stabilizing Pea Island will become higher. Construction impacts to wetlands and sea grass beds are essentially the same for each bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Wings-News from the Coastal North Carolina National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service News from the Coastal North Carolina National February 2020 Wildlife Refuges Complex Volume XXIII Alligator River, Pea Island, Pocosin Lakes, No. 1 Roanoke River, Mackay Island, Currituck, Mattamuskeet, Swanquarter and Cedar Island Saying Goodbye to Miss Cindy At her retirement party The refuge bought a tram in August 2019, friends during Cindy’s tenure. She and co-workers of Visitor developed a tram tour for Alligator Services Specialist Cindy River that has been offered Heffley, celebrated her 20 weekly during the summer and years of service with the monthly during U.S. Fish and Wildlife the rest of the year. The refuge Service, 11 of those years also built the Gateway Visitor on the refuges in North Center and Cindy developed Carolina. a preschool program that she conducted every Friday and other programs for visiting children. Both the tram tour and visitor center programs USFWS not only educated, but attracted new audiences to the refuges. Cindy was an excellent trainer, mentor, and supervisor to the interns that work on the refuge every summer. She Inside this Issue: organized the tours and programs that they led and monitored their progress as Pea Island Refuge Biology Notes ............2 they became proficient. Volunteer Neal Moore ................................2 She’s always been willing to assist all of the refuges in the area as they developed Bio Intern Elizabeth Piña .........................2 their own programs. Her dedication USFWS and enthusiasm towards her work has Education/Red Wolf Interns .....................3 Cindy arrived at a momentous time in inspired everyone with whom she worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Article to Where Is the Lost Colony?
    Challenges to living by the sea A supplement to the serial story, Where is The Lost Colony? written by Sandy Semans, editor, Outer Banks Sentinel The thin ribbon of sand that forms the chain of islands known as the Outer Banks is bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and on the west by the sounds. The shapes of the islands and the inlets that run between them continue to be altered by hurricanes, nor’easters and other weather events. Inlets that often proved to be moving targets created access to the ocean and the sounds. Inlets were formed and then later filled with sand and disappeared. Maps of the coastline show many places named “New Inlet,” although currently there is no inlet there. The one exception has been Ocracoke Inlet between Ocracoke and Portsmouth islands. Marine geologists estimate that the existing inlet — with some minor changes — has been in place for at least 2500 years. During the English exploration of the 1500’s, most likely the ships came through this inlet, making it a long sail to Roanoke Island. At that time, there was a small shallow inlet between Hatteras and Ocracoke islands, but the shallow inlet probably was avoided for fear of going aground. By the early 1700s, this inlet had filled in, and the two became just one long island. But in 1846, a hurricane created two major inlets. One, now called Oregon Inlet, sliced through the sand, leaving today’s Pea Island to the south and Bodie Island to the north. And a second inlet, now known as Hatteras Inlet, once again separated Hatteras Island from Ocracoke Island.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Overviw of the Beaufort Inlet Cape Lookout Area of North
    by June 21, 1982 You can stand on Cape Point at Hatteras on a stormy day and watch two oceans come together in an awesome display of savage fury; for there at the Point the northbound Gulf Stream and the cold currents coming down from the Arctic run head- on into each other, tossing their spumy spray a hundred feet or better into the air and dropping sand and shells and sea life at the point of impact. Thus is formed the dreaded Diamond Shoals, its fang-like shifting sand bars pushing seaward to snare the unwary mariner. Seafaring men call it the Graveyard of the Atlantic. Actually, the Graveyard extends along the whole of the North Carolina coast, northward past Chicamacomico, Bodie Island, and Nags Head to Currituck Beach, and southward in gently curving arcs to the points of Cape Lookout and Cape Fear. The bareribbed skeletons of countless ships are buried there; some covered only by water, with a lone spar or funnel or rusting winch showing above the surface; others burrowed deep in the sands, their final resting place known only to the men who went down with them. From the days of the earliest New World explorations, mariners have known the Graveyard of the Atlantic, have held it in understandable awe, yet have persisted in risking their vessels and their lives in its treacherous waters. Actually, they had no choice in the matter, for a combination of currents, winds, geography, and economics have conspired to force many of them to sail along the North Carolina coast if they wanted to sail at all!¹ Thus begins David Stick’s Graveyard of the Atlantic (1952), a thoroughly researched, comprehensive, and finely-crafted history of shipwrecks along the entire coast of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • 136-89.182. North Carolina Turnpike Authority. (A) Creation. – There Is Created a Body Politic and Corporate to Be Known As the "North Carolina Turnpike Authority"
    Article 6H. Public Toll Roads and Bridges. Part 1. Turnpike Authority and Bridges. § 136-89.180. Legislative findings. The General Assembly finds that the existing State road system is becoming increasingly congested and overburdened with traffic in many areas of the State; that the sharp surge of vehicle miles traveled is overwhelming the State's ability to build and pay for adequate road improvements; and that an adequate answer to this challenge will require the State to be innovative and utilize several new approaches to transportation improvements in North Carolina. Toll funding of highway and bridge construction is feasible in North Carolina and can contribute to addressing the critical transportation needs of the State. A toll program can speed the implementation of needed transportation improvements by funding some projects with tolls. (2002-133, s. 1.) § 136-89.181. Definitions. The following definitions apply to this Article: (1) Department. – The North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2) Turnpike Authority. – The public agency created by this Article. (3) Authority Board. – The governing board of the Turnpike Authority. (4) Turnpike project. – Either of the following: a. A road, bridge, or tunnel project planned, or planned and constructed, in accordance with the provisions of this Article. b. A segment of the State highway system the Authority Board converts to a tolled highway pursuant to the authorization in G.S. 136-89.187. (5) Turnpike system. – All Turnpike projects. (2002-133, s. 1; 2008-225, s. 3.) § 136-89.182. North Carolina Turnpike Authority. (a) Creation. – There is created a body politic and corporate to be known as the "North Carolina Turnpike Authority".
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Fear Sail & Power Squadron
    Cape Fear Sail & Power Squadron We are America’s Boating Club® NORTH CAROLINA OCEAN INLETS Listed in order of location north to south Oregon Inlet Outer Banks. Northern-most ocean inlet in NC. Located at the north end of New Topsail Inlet Near ICW Mile 270. As of July Hatteras Island. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. 7, ’20, the inlet was routinely passable by medium Federally maintained.* See Corps of Engineers and small vessels at higher states of the tide. survey1 However, buoys were removed in 2017 due to shoaling, so the channel is currently unmarked. See Hatteras Inlet Outer Banks. Located between Corps of Engineers survey Hatteras and Ocracoke Islands. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. Once inside the inlet itself, the Little Topsail Inlet Located ½ N.M. SW of New passage of a lengthy inshore channel is required to Topsail Inlet. Not normally passable and does not access the harbor or navigable portions of Pamlico currently connect to navigable channels inshore. Sound. Rich Inlet Located between Topsail and Figure 8 Ocracoke Inlet Outer Banks. Located at S end Islands near ICW Mile 275. of Ocracoke Is. Provides access to Pamlico Sound. Once inside the inlet itself, the passage of a shifting Mason Inlet Located between Figure 8 Island and inshore channel named Teaches Hole is required to Wrightsville Beach island near ICW Mile 280. access the harbor or navigable portions of Pamlico Dredged in 2019 but not buoyed as of July 31, ’20. Sound. Buoyed & lighted as of June 29, ’19. See Corps of Engineers surveys1 (for the inlet) and (for Masonboro Inlet Located between Wrightsville Teaches Hole).
    [Show full text]
  • Long Bridge-Cost Effective 2
    Bonner Bridge Replacement Long Bridge is More Cost Effective Background For two decades, North Carolina and the people of Dare County have struggled with the need to repair or replace the Bonner Bridge and maintain NC-12 to provide a safer, more reliable hurricane evacuation route. Bonner Bridge has reached the end of its life and short-term repairs are becoming prohibitively expensive. NC-12 is built on one of the most rapidly eroding shorelines in the United States and up to $1 million a year or more is needed to clear the road after storm overwash. Due to the dynamic nature of this barrier island system, the ocean will continue to claim more of the island, and storms will continue to create overwashes, making NC-12 impassable. A long-term, cost-effective solution is needed to provide reliable transportation. Cost Analysis Clearly Points to Long Bridge There are two solutions for fixing this problem: Bonner Bridge Cost Analysis 1) Replace the Bonner Bridge with a parallel bridge and then continue to fix NC-12 as $1,200 needed (“short bridge alternative”); or 2) Build $1,000 a 17-mile bridge over Pamlico Sound, bypassing s r a l Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge and letting l $800 o d the island return to its natural state (“long f o $600 s bridge alternative”). n o i l l i $400 The short bridge alternative would require M replacing Bonner Bridge at an estimated $191 $200 million. However, due to frequent overwashes $0 on NC-12 and erosion, extensive maintenance Short Bridge Short Bridge Long Bridge would be required to keep the road open to alternative, NCDOT alternative, NCDOT alternative traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County 1790-1958
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Historic and Architectural Resources of Currituck County, 1790-1958 Section __E___ Page __1 =================================================================================== Introduction “When Nature came to design the topography of eastern North Carolina,” wrote North Carolina historian Charles Christopher Crittenden in 1936, “she almost persuaded herself to create a great maritime center.”1 The interplay between water and land in Currituck is key to understanding the history and evolution of the county. Although one of the oldest in the state of North Carolina, the county has also been one of the most overlooked. Piecing together the history of the county is difficult. Many of the records pertaining to the early history of Currituck have been lost or destroyed. A courthouse fire in 1842, for example, destroyed a substantial body of records, including marriage records. As a consequence, much of the county’s past lives on as oral history; written accounts tend to be either personal reminiscences or a recounting of events that have been passed orally through the different generations of a family. The history of the county remains to be written. A Geographical Overview of the County The most northeasterly of the one hundred North Carolina counties, Currituck is a peninsula: the land is long and narrow, low and even. The county consists of a mainland 1 Charles Christoper Crittenden, The Commerce of North Carolina 1763-1789. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1936, p. 8. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No.
    [Show full text]