DOCSLIB.ORG

James Irving of Ironshore and His Descendants 1713-1918

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Irving of Ironshore and His Descendants 1713-1918 James Irving the Elder. /5' JAMES IRVING OF IRONSHORE AND HIS DESCENDANTS 1713-1918 JAMES IRVING OF IRONSHORE AND HIS DESCENDANTS 1713-1918 By Sir T^milius Irving, Knight Bachelor, King's Counsel, Canada; &c., &c. Edited by L. Homfray Irving. Printed by College Press Limited Toronto, Canada 19 18 /, I' \ AT THE DESIRE OF THE LATE SIR /EMILIUS IRVING, ONE HUNDRED COPIES OF THIS BOOK HAVE BEEN PRINTED FOR DISTRIBUTION AMONG THE DESCENDANTS OF JAMES IRVING, OF IRONSHORE, JAMAICA, AND HIS WIFE ELIZABETH MOTTE, OF WHICH THIS COPY IS NO. ILLUSTRATIONS James Irving the Elder Facing Title-page {From the painting in possession of Gugy M. Irving) James Irving the Elder 10 {From the miniature in possession of Mrs. Louis Sutherland) Elizabeth Motte 22 {Ditto) Jacob ^Emilius Irving the First 32 {From the painting by Gilbert Stuart in possession of Gugy yE. Irving) Jacob ^milius Irving^-Memorial Tablet, St. James' Church, Liverpool 44 {From a photograph by Mowll & Morrison, Liverpool) Ironshore Sugar Works, 1893 54 {From a photograph by J. Shore, Montego Bay, Jamaica) Hannah Margaret Irving—Memorial Tablet, St. John's Church, Stamford 64 (Designed and made by Patterson & Heward, Toronto) Memorial Tablet, St. John's Church, Stamford 67 {Designed and made by Patterson &f Reward, Toronto) CoRBETT House, Cumberland Street, Charleston, S.C 76 {From pen and ink drawing in possession of Mrs. Mmilius Jarvis) Memorial Tablet, Church of Ascension, Hamilton. ..80 {Designed and made by Patterson df Heward, Toronto) Jacob ^milius Irving the Second, 1816 88 {From the miniature in possession of Gugy M. Irving) BoNSHAW, Canada, 1840-1913 98 {From a photograph by Oscar Freemantle, Toronto) Catherine Diana Homfray, 1820 100 {From the pastel in possession of L. Homfray Irving) Sir ^milius Irving, 1908 112 {From a photograph by Inglis, Toronto) Gugy ^Emilius Irving, 1916 122 {From a photograph by J. Kennedy, Toronto) Sir Jeremiah Homfray, 1820 134 {From the pastel in possession of L. Homfray Irving) INTRODUCTION With a view to the writing of a History of James Irving and his descendants my father, Sir ^milius Irving, must have prepared and committed to paper, prior to the early Seventies, considerable amount of material dealing with his relatives and to have ceased further work thereon in 1881. I judge that, by his recording the deaths of his cousin John Beaufin the Second, at Cheltenham in 1876 and that of his uncle John Beaufain the First at West Bergen in 1881 as no later dates appear after the above two. Other duties in a, busy life compelled him to postpone its termination for many years, until old age prevented the com- pletion of further family recoUect'ons, or even the revision of the notes which he had prepared. It was in May, 1913, that he transferred the work over to me and at his request I under- took to carry it to a finality. Upon this occasion when he was already confined to bed, he instructed me to "go ahead and print," adding whatever seemed necessary, and that a copy was to be given to each descendant of James and Elizabeth Irving, that he himself would write an Introduction and select a suitable Title for the book. Would that he had, but his long illness followed by his death in November of that year, prevented his ever again putting his hand to paper. Sir iCmilius' death, prior to the book's completion, neces- sitated the consent of my sisters and brothers being obtained before the necessary expenses could be entailed for its publica- tion; their co-operation in meeting our late father's wishes was most readily given. Whether it was intended by him or not to have printed the History, as the manuscript stood at the time of its transfer to me, cannot now be ascertained, but, presumably, his instruc- tions permitted the inclusion, for instance, of his own life as well as those of others omitted by him; believing that I was justified in so doing, considerable fresh matter has been intro- duced as it is assumed that James Irving's descendants would naturally take an interest in finding out exactly "Where they come in" and "Who was So-and-so." As examples of additions the cases of ".Emilia Irving, 1751-1809," and "Elizabeth Irving, 1747-1808," are submitted; in the former, my father's narrative ends with the fifth paragraph and in the latter with the second. The sketches of the chief actors and important epochs in this History remain untouched by any other hand, with one exception—they are James the Elder; James the Second, the Third and the Fourth; John Beaufin the First and the Second; Hannah Margaret Corbett and her many trials; Jacob ^Cmilius the First and his two children, Thomas Corbett and Elizabeth Margaret; John Beaufain the First; Canada, 1834; the Graves at Stamford, and Ironshore and Hartfield, the latter being the one exception. The foregoing are specified for more reasons than one, but I do not wish to have my errors placed upon my father's shoulders, and at the same time may it be added that the footnotes are mine, with but two exceptions which are indicated by my father's initials. To the best of my ability I have endeavoured to carry out his wishes of securing further information relating to the Mottes, Harlestons and other Carolina connections, and in this respect have been much assisted by Miss Webber, Secretary of the South Carolina Historical Society—that Society's Magazine being a mine of wealth. A number of the early marriages, births and deaths have been taken from the former sources as well as from the printed Register of St. Philip's Church, Charles- ton. The long and stormy voyage of AfTra Harleston in the "Caroline," lasting from August, 1669, to April, 1670, is fully described in the Shaftesbury Papers which are to be found in the Public Record Office, London. Other sources of informa- tion have been Sir Jere Homfray's Memoranda Book, 1796- 1832; Jacob ^milius the Second, 1821-1850; my father's diaries and correspondence, 1843-1913; letters to Hannah Margaret Corbett as well as those of the family generally; and the letter books of Jacob ^Emilius the First from 1795 to 1816, dealing chiefly with Ironshore and Hartfield; all of the foregoing being in my possession, and are available for further family enquiries. There remain several points yet to be cleared up: (a) James Irving's career prior to his appearance in the Bermudas, ^milius Jarvis during his visit to Russia in 1915 endeavoured to secure this information but without success; the British Embassy's papers of those times having been transferred to the PubHc Record Office, and; the present War rendering further searches impossible, the subject ended there. Gugy iEmilius Irving the Second, during his visit to Scotland in 1914, was good enough to undertake searches in connection with James' medical career, and reported that neither in the Catalogue of the Graduates in Arts, Divinity and Law of Edinburgh University, as published by the Bannatyne Club, nor in the Charter and Regulations of the College of Physicians from 1681 (published at Edinburgh in 1789) does the name of James Irving appear. There were, however, other places and means in those days of becoming a professional man—one by apprenticeship to a physician. (b) The antecedents of the Motte family, before John Abraham Motte's arrival in South Carolina, and the why and wherefore of his migration from Europe to the Barbadoes. A search amongst the publications of the Huguenot Society failed to bring anything to light chiefly because one did not know whether the name then was De la Motte or not. In August of this year a book of interest to the family has been published under the title, "The Dwelling Houses of Charleston, South Carolina," which contains numerous references to the Motte family and others mentioned in these pages, with illustrations of Jacob Motte's residence for "many years before 1762"; I think this illustration also appeared in Harper's Magazine, October, 1915. I mention this as the latter may be accessible to the many, whilst the book is a limited edition. (c) The origin of the Harleston family; a family of this name, and resident in the district from which Affra Harleston came, is constantly met with in the Publications of The Harleian Society and in the Sloan MS. No less interesting would be the solution of the origin of the name, "Affra"; whether it has any con- nection with Micah, chapter 1, verse 10, and Jeremiah, chapter 6, verse 26? Besides the authorities quoted in the text, I owe thanks to many members of James* descendants, for help and information dealing with their immediate relations; also to Mr. Tugwell for solving the difficulties connected with the illustrations, the export from Great Britain of the desired paper having been prohibited, and to the College Press Limited, for the careful and friendly interest shown in the typographical execution and appearance of the volume. The work, with its many shortcomings, now goes forth as a memento of my late father, and I cannot do better than date its birth as being of the same day as that of my eldest brother, the present proprietor of Ironshore and Hartfield. L. HOMFRAY IRVING. 372 Huron Street, Toronto, Canada. 2nd October, 1917 JAMES IRVING OF IRONSHORE AND HIS DESCENDANTS JAMES IRVING a younger son of a Border Laird* in the County of Dumfries, who went into the world to seek his fortune, first to Russia, then to Bermuda, afterwards to South Carolina and eventually to Jamaica where he lived many years, brought up a large family, acquired property and an honourable position.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L'histoire D'yamachiche # 7 (Août 2012)
    L’histoire d’Yamachiche La famille Gugy Cette famille fut très importante pour notre municipalité et la région entière. Le 17 novembre 1980, le conseil municipal désigne une rue du nom de Conrad-Gugy. Conrad, né à La Haye au Pays-Bas vers 1734, fut jeune lieutenant de la 60e infanterie du Royal American au côté de Wolfe lors de la bataille des Plaines d'Abraham, le 13 septembre 1759. Il fut secrétaire particulier, confident et conseiller du gouverneur Frederick Haldimand du district de Trois-Rivières en 1763 et parlait aussi bien le français que l'anglais. L'année suivante, il laisse son poste pour acquérir les seigneuries de Grosbois Ouest et de Grandpré. Une première seigneurie canadienne passait à un homme entièrement dédié à l'Angleterre et ce sera celle d'Yamachiche. Conrad développa le « Domaine » qui comprenait le manoir en 1764 et le moulin à farine en 1772 qui étaient situés sur les terres de Monsieur Jacques Bergeron entre l’autoroute 40 et le 320 Gérin-Lajoie. Le Chemin du Roi passait directement sur son « Domaine ». De plus, plusieurs secteurs se développèrent : Grosbois Ouest; Petites-Terres; Village des Caron; Village de la Mission et la route de la Chicane. Il acheta trois autres seigneuries en 1771 : Dumontier, Frédérick (secteur des Forges) et Rivière-du-Loup (partie de St-Léon-le-Grand). C’est à St-Léon-le-Grand qu’il découvrit en 1783, une source d’eau minérale salée en grande quantité et en garde l’exploitation, mais cède la terre qui contient la dite source à Louis et François Paillé, d’oùnaîtra en 1849 l’histoire de « La Saline ».
    [Show full text]
  • Officers of the British Forces in Canada During the War of 1812-15
    J Suxjnp ep-eu'BQ UT aqq. jo sjaoijjo II JC-B.IJUIOH 'i SUTAJI n Auvuan oiNOHOi do 13>IDOd SIH1 lAIOUd SdHS HO SQdVD 3AOIAI3d ION 00 3SV31d r? 9 VlJVf .Si Canadian Military Institute OFFICERS OF THE British Forces in Canada DURING THE WAR OF 1812=15 BY HOMFRAY IRVING, Honorary librarian. WETLAND TRIBUNE PRINT. 1908 ~* u u Gin co F>. Year Nineteen Hundred and Entered According to Act of Parliament, in the in the Office of the Minister of Agriculture. Eight, by L. Homfray Irving, INTRODUCTION " A which takes no in the noble " people pride achievements of remote ancestors will never "achieve anything worthy to be remembered "with pride by remote descendants." Macaulay's History of England. The accompanying lists of officers, who served during the war of 1812-15, are compiled from the records of the grants of land made in Upper Canada to officers, non-commissioned officers and men who had served in "the first flank Companies, the Provincial Artillery, the Incorporated Regiment, the Corps of Artillery Drivers, the Provincial Dragoons, the Marine and General Staff of the Army,"* and in Lower Canada, to "the officers and men of the Embodied Militia, discharged troops and others."** All those who participated in the Prince Regent's Bounty, as these land grants were called, are indicated by a star in front of their respective names. The names of those who received land grants as above have been supplemented by names from pay lists, appointments and promotions as published in Militia Orders, returns, petitions and correspondence in the office of the Archivist and Keeper of the Records, Arthur G.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Xxiv
    CHAPTER XXIV. Crown lands management Waste lands in seigniories Government officials Army bills redeemed Banking Political situation, 1816 The two Papineaus Sessions of 1817-1819 Death of George III., 1820 A speech of Louis-Joseph Papineau. To portion out the lands amongst the militia, General Drummond, the administrator of the province (1815), was constrained to have recourse to the officials of a department in which enormous abuses existed. The lands were divided up between favourites. So much territory had been given away that Drummond informed the minister that there was no more room on the River St. Francis for the establishment of the immigrants and the discharged soldiers. Every one had pounced down upon that immense pasture ground. From 1793 to 1811, over three million acres had been granted to a couple of hundred privileged applicants. Some of them secured as much as sixty to eighty thousand acres as, for example, Governor Milnes, who took nearly seventy thousand as his share. These people had no intention of ever improving the land by clearing it of the forest. As it cost them nothing, they purposed leaving the same in a wild state until such time as the development of the neigh- bourhood by colonization would increase the value of the whole. Another vexatious land question arose out of the vast domains granted by the King of France to the so-called seigneurs which were intended, by the letter and spirit of the grants themselves, to be given to the settlers whenever they wished for them. Large tracts of these still remained unoc- cupied and the seigneurs had often expressed the desire to get them as their own property in free and common socage, whilst the country people main- tained that they were to be kept en seigneurie according to the intention of the sovereign who first granted them.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1832 Montreal Cholera Epidemic: a Study in State Formation
    The 1832 Montreal Cholera Epidemic: A Study in State Formation by Walter Sendzik Department of History McGill University, Montreal A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial filfilment of the degree of Masters in History September 1997 @Walter Sendzik, 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington OttawaON K1AON4 Ottawa ON KI A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libraq of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distnbute or sell reproduire, prêter, distn'buer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/fih, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fomat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propiété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fhm it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pemiission. autorisation. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. The Montreal Board of Health ..........................................................................................-.............................................. 8 - 23 1, Histories of Boards of HeaIth II. Legislation II[][. Members of the Montreal Board of Health IV Social Regulation V. Enforcement VI. Finances of the Board of Health 2. Medicalization of Government .......................................................................................................................................... 24 - 35 1, The Medical Profession II.
    [Show full text]
  • National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 "The Foundation of British Strength": National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ARTS AND SCIENCES “The Foundation of British Strength:” National Identity and the British Common Soldier By Steven Schwamenfeld A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Steven Schwamenfeld defended on Dec. 5, 2006. ___________________ Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Dissertation _____________ Patrick O’Sullivan Outside Committee Member _________________ Michael Cresswell Committee Member ________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member Approved: ___________________ Neil Jumonville, Chair History Department The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv Abstract v Introduction 1 I. “Thou likes the Smell of Poother” 13 II. “Our Poor Fellows” 42 III. “Hardened to my Lot” 63 IV. “…to Conciliate the Inhabitants” 92 V. Redcoats and Hessians 112 VI. The Jewel in the Crown of Thorns 135 VII. Soldiers, Settlers, Slaves and Savages 156 VIII. Conclusion 185 Appendix 193 Bibliography 199 Biographical Sketch 209 iii LIST OF
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Xxii
    CHAPTER XXII. Debates in the assembly, 1808-1810 Talk of war Preparations for defence, 1808 Sir James Craig and his surroundings Trade, navigation, finance Trouble with the assembly Le Canadien suppressed, 1810 Elections Sir James recalled, 1811. A song composed in Quebec alluded to the Milnes-Ryland-Sewell anti- Canadian party as pretty fair tyrants, but quite a small battalion to meet ' ' ' ' the Americans and the chorus ran : They will rely on our arms. These lines are a perfect picture of the time. The House opened 28th February, 1807. Subjects of debate: War in Europe; state of affairs with the American Republic; the Jews in the contested elections circulation of wood and assembly ; ; monetary ; inspection the elected members of the lumber ; judges legislative assembly ; importation of works taxes on notarial land and liquor ; public ; deeds, surveyors copies from public archives; pilotage; Three Rivers hospital. The assembly took into consideration the expediency of having an authorized agent, resident in Great Britain, for the purpose of attending to the interests of the province, when occasion should require, and deter- mined that it would be highly advantageous to have such an one legally authorized and resident there. No other action was taken on this subject. An effort was made in 1807 towards obtaining an allowance for defray- ing the expenses of the members of the assembly who resided at a distance from Quebec, but the subject was postponed. "That the Canadians at this time were loyal to Great Britain, and out of all sympathy with the course of events in France, is shown by their enthusiastic celebration of Nelson's victory at Trafalgar."* "From the beginning of the war comparatively large amounts were contributed by Canadians of all creeds and classes towards the funds neces- sary for its prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Canadian Sources Related to Southern Revolutionary War
    Research Project for Southern Revolutionary War National Parks National Parks Service Solicitation Number: 500010388 GUIDE TO CANADIAN SOURCES RELATED TO SOUTHERN REVOLUTIONARY WAR NATIONAL PARKS by Donald E. Graves Ensign Heritage Consulting PO Box 282 Carleton Place, Ontario Canada, K7C 3P4 in conjunction with REEP INC. PO Box 2524 Leesburg, VA 20177 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND GUIDE TO CONTENTS OF STUDY 1A: Object of Study 1 1B: Summary of Survey of Relevant Primary Sources in Canada 1 1C: Expanding the Scope of the Study 3 1D: Criteria for the Inclusion of Material 3 1E: Special Interest Groups (1): The Southern Loyalists 4 1F: Special Interest Groups (2): Native Americans 7 1G: Special Interest Groups (3): African-American Loyalists 7 1H: Special Interest Groups (4): Women Loyalists 8 1I: Military Units that Fought in the South 9 1J: A Guide to the Component Parts of this Study 9 PART 2: SURVEY OF ARCHIVAL SOURCES IN CANADA Introduction 11 Ontario Queen's University Archives, Kingston 11 University of Western Ontario, London 11 National Archives of Canada, Ottawa 11 National Library of Canada, Ottawa 27 Archives of Ontario, Toronto 28 Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library 29 Quebec Archives Nationales de Quebec, Montreal 30 McCord Museum / McGill University Archives, Montreal 30 Archives de l'Universite de Montreal 30 New Brunswick 32 Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, Fredericton 32 Harriet Irving Memorial Library, Fredericton 32 University of New Brunswick Archives, Fredericton 32 New Brunswick Museum Archives,
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Loyalists in the American Revolution a Sketch
    CCHA Study Sessions, 48(1981), 91-99 Catholic Loyalists in the American Revolution A Sketch The following sketch was delivered b y F r . J. S. McGivern, s. j. , Ar- chivist of the Archdiocese of Toronto. It concerns those loyalists who professed the Roman Catholic religion and whose story has never been fully told. This sketch treats of “some rather minor but not unimportant points,” as Father McGivern put it. Editor. In this paper it is intended to treat – 1. The condition of Catholics in the various states; 2. The passing of “The Intolerable Acts” with special reference to the “ Quebec Act”; 3. A brief indication of the reaction to this last Act; 4. Some examination of loyalism among the Catholics, and finally; 5. The story, so often told, of a particular group of Highland Scots, Catholic loyalists. Our modern historians, undeniably, lack a required statistical foundation for reaching a solid understanding of the United Empire Loyalists in the Revolution. Because of this lack of knowledge we commonly resort to general population percentages and so a strong reliance on round figures and easily remembered proportions. First we should indicate the estimated numbers in the rebellious Colonies. I am in no position to verify these figures. I shall take them from the latest volumes of the Encyclopedia Britan n ica. According to this source there were in the colonies a population of over 4,500,000 (four and a half million). Of these the overwhelming number were non-Catholic. In fact only some 25,000 were Catholics. The majority of these seem to have been in New York, Pennsylvania and Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen. Nathanael Greene's Moves to Force the British Into The
    ` The Journal of the Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution ` Vol. 12, No. 1.1 January 23, 2015 Gen. Nathanael Greene’s Moves to Force the British into the Charlestown Area, to Capture Dorchester, Johns Island and to Protect the Jacksonborough Assembly November 1781 - February 1782 Charles B. Baxley © 2015 Fall 1781 – South Carolina The British Southern strategy was unraveling. Lt. Gen. Charles, Lord Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, Virginia in October 1781. The British army of occupation in North and South Carolina and Georgia could hold selected posts and travel en masse at will, but could not control the countryside where rebel militias and state troops patrolled. Their southern strongholds were within 35 miles of their supply ports: Charlestown, Savannah and Wilmington, NC. In South Carolina the British withdrew from their advanced bases at Camden, Ninety Six, Augusta, and Georgetown, and only held posts arcing around Charlestown in the aftermath of the bloody battle at Eutaw Springs in September. Defending Charlestown, the British had major forward posts at Fair Lawn Barony (in modern Moncks Corner) at the head of navigation of the west branch of the Cooper River; at the colonial town of Dorchester at the head of navigation on the Ashley River; at the Wappataw Meeting House on the headwaters of the Wando River; and at Stono Ferry to control mainland access across the Stono River to Johns Maj. Gen. Nathanael Greene, 1783 Island. The parishes north of Charlestown were contested portrait by Charles Willson Peale, ground. British cavalry rode at will to the south side of the Independence National Historical Santee River and as far upstream as Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • Olunteer Corps Were Formed in Ireland from Early in the 18Th Century As
    olunteer corps were formed in Ireland from early in the 18th century as local defence forces attached to the militia, formed in 1715 due to the threat of Stuart invasion. There is no precise information on the composition or organisation of these bodies, but what appears to have happened, at least in some areas, was that at a general muster when the commissioner of array had enrolled sufficient numbers into the militia, they organised their troops of horse and companies of foot into regiments. The units not regimented were known as independent companies or independent troops. The Independents were probably allowed as concessions to local feeling, recognising that men often served better under officers with whom they were Silver medals of Thomas Smyth's Limerick Union, 1776. personally acquainted, a link which could Limerick Museum. be lost in a regiment. There was an ethos of voluntary service about an independent assembly, much like the Irish Parliament, company which was lacking in a regular elected by the colonists. As with Ireland, militia unit. However, there was no the English parliament claimed supreme question of independent companies being power over the colonies and when, in raised outside of the militia framework. 37,000 men, increasing to about 50,000 as 1763, parliament began to impose taxes on Their officers were appointed by the usual a result of the French threat at Bantry at the American colonists, they objected, militia commission, and there was even a the end of 1796. Continued alarms and claiming that an English subject should feeling that it might be treasonable to widespread discontent saw the force grow not be taxed without consultation and raise a company without waiting for official to about 75,000 in September 1797, and be representation, and eventually in 1775 authorisation'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montreal Almanack, Or, Lower Canada Register for 1830
    # t> .v%^o^ ^ m. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) '^ 1.0 !f:il^IIIIIM i^M 2.2 |4o III 2.0 I.I 1.8 1.25 1.4 i^ • 6" — V <^ /a ^M, ^^ ''' Photographic 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 Sciences (716) 872-4503 Corporation CIHM/ICMH CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Collection de Series. microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques The C( Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques Technical and to the The Institute has attempted to obtain the best L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire original copy available for filming. Features of this qu'il lui a 6*^ possible de se procurer. Les dMails copy which may be bibliographically unique, de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du Their which may alter any of the images in the point de vue bibliograph^que, qu' peuvent modifier reproduction, or which may significantly change une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une possil of thf the usual method of filming, are checked below. modification dans la mdthode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. filmin Coloured covers/ Coloured pages/ I I Orlgir Couverture de couleur Pages de couleur begin the la I Covers damaged/ Pages damaged/ I I I sion, Pages endommagdes Couverture endommagde other first t Covers restored and/or laminated/ I Pages restored and/orand/oi laminated/ sion. I restaurde et/ou pellicul6e Pages restaur^es et/ou pelliculdes D Couverture or illu Cover title missing/ I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/foxe< I I I Le titre de couverture manque Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqudes Coloured maps/ Pages detached/ Thel( I I D Cartes gdographiques en couleur Pages ddtachdes shall TINU whici Coloured ink (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Outline
    Southern Campaigns, Revolutionary War Phase II: Research in Great Britain _________________________ Southern Campaigns of the Revolutionary War Phase II: Research in Great Britain Final Report for National Park Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by Evans-Hatch & Associates 510 Duane Street, Astoria, Oregon (503) 325-1313 / [email protected] August 2003 1 ________________________________ Evans-Hatch & Associates Final Report, August 2003 Southern Campaigns, Revolutionary War Phase II: Research in Great Britain _________________________ CONTENTS PART 1: Narrative Report Introduction Objective Methods Observations and Findings Resources Investigated General Findings Suggestions for Future Activities Collections in Scotland Additional Work in the United Kingdom and North America PART 2: Regiments List: British and Loyalist PART 3: Bibliography Printed Primary Sources Guides and Finding Aids Books and Journal Articles PART 4: List of Repositories Contacted PART 5: Archive Document Record Index Summaries of Record Content Inventory of Records PART 6: Appendices A: Correspondence with Repositories Sample Letters from Evans-Hatch & NPS Director Jerry Belson Responses from Repositories B: The National Archives (Public Record Office) Finding Aids: Leaflets Ordering Copies (Microform and Other Forms) C. Archive Document Record Form D: Copies of Selected Research Material (in separate notebook) PART 7: Electronic Report Electronic Final Report (MS WORD) Inventory (MS ACCESS database) 2 ________________________________ Evans-Hatch
    [Show full text]